Professional Documents
Culture Documents
16 River Meandering
JM Hooke, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
r 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
9.16.1
9.16.2
9.16.3
9.16.3.1
9.16.3.1.1
9.16.3.1.2
9.16.3.1.3
9.16.3.2
9.16.3.2.1
9.16.4
9.16.4.1
9.16.4.2
9.16.4.3
9.16.4.3.1
9.16.4.3.2
9.16.4.3.3
9.16.4.4
9.16.4.5
9.16.5
9.16.5.1
9.16.5.2
9.16.5.3
9.16.6
9.16.6.1
9.16.7
References
Introduction
Research Phases and Topics
Approaches and Methods
Empirical Approaches
Field measurements and observations
Map and remote sensing evidence
Techniques of meander morphology and change analysis
Theoretical and Numerical Modeling Approaches
Experimental modeling
Empirical Evidence and Analysis
Morphology
Morphological Change
Meander Processes
Flow patterns and sediment movement
Bank erosion
Deposition and bar formation
Bedrock and Incised Meanders
Spatial Distribution and Controls on Characteristics
Theoretical and Conceptual Explanations
Fundamental Physical and Numerical Analyses
Conceptual Analyses
Experimental, Modeling and Numerical Analysis Results
Perspective and Synthesis
Future Research
Conclusions
260
262
264
264
264
265
265
265
267
268
268
269
272
272
275
275
276
276
277
277
279
280
281
282
282
283
Abstract
Various phases of progress and differing approaches to research on river meandering are identified. Since early quantification of equilibrium relations of meander morphology to discharge and sediment, research has been pursued empirically,
theoretically, and experimentally. The theoretical approaches have sought to provide fundamental explanations of meander
development and produced numerical simulations. Empirical work, using field, map, and air photo evidence, has demonstrated variations in meander morphology, and stability and the evolution of meanders over time to compound forms
and cut-offs; it has elucidated process mechanisms and interactions. Flume work has investigated the effects of particular
conditions. Research using these differing approaches is now converging.
9.16.1
Introduction
Meandering rivers are single channels with a sinuous planform comprising a series of loops, frequently depicted as
regular and simple in form and size, but in reality often having
some irregularity, asymmetry, and complexity (Figure 1). They
are differentiated from braided channel patterns, which have
multiple channels or multiple free bars within the course, and
straight channels, which have very low sinuosity, though this
lower limit of meandering is somewhat arbitrary. Thresholds
260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00241-4
River Meandering
261
(a)
(e)
(b)
(f)
(c)
(d)
(g)
Figure 1 Photographs illustrating the characteristics and variability of meander morphology, Images (a)(c) US National Fish and Wildlife
Service; Images (d)(k) Google Earth; Images (l)(n) J M Hooke.
262
River Meandering
(h)
(i)
(j)
(m)
(k)
(l)
(n)
Figure 1 Continued.
occurrence and behavior of river meandering in nature. Common features of river meanders are depicted in Figure 2.
9.16.2
Down valley
bank
ave
c
n
Co
Pool
263
Cross valley
River Meandering
Ch
P
ffle
Ri
Vegetation
Riffle
Point
Rc
F lo
eg
a lw
ute
ar
tb
oin
Rc
Radius of curvature
Tn
Vegetation
Vegetation
bar
Channel
width
Pool
Conc
ave bank
Figure 2 Common features of meanders. Redrawn with permission from Lagasse, P.F., Zevenbergen, L.W., Spitz, W.J., Thorne, C.R., 2004.
Methodology for predicting channel migration. NCHRP Web-Only Document 67 (Project 24-16). Report prepared for TRB (Transportation
Research Board of the National Academies of the US) http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w67.pdf
264
River Meandering
Coriolis force
Energy arguments (excess, minimization)
Bank erosion and sediment effect
Helical and secondary flows
Inherent property of turbulent flow
Interaction between flow and mobile channel
Bar theory
Bend theory.
9.16.3
A major division can be made into theoretical/modeling approaches and empirical approaches to river meandering. The
modeling approaches comprise numerical/analytical models
and the experimental (hardware) models. Empirical approaches entail field measurements and use of historical and
remote sensing data. Some empirical research has produced
inductive or kinematic models and some of these observed
relations have been used in other numerical simulations.
9.16.3.1
9.16.3.1.1
Empirical Approaches
Field measurements and observations
River Meandering
9.16.3.1.2
9.16.3.1.3
265
9.16.3.2
55
54
50
48
NW
SE
100 m
57
0 0.25 0.5
1 mile
53
(b)
Scale 1:55.000
0 0.25 0.5
45
49
2001
1984
1970
1907
1871
1840
1 mile
Scale 1:55.000
(c)
NW
0 0.25 0.5
Radnor
bridge
SE
1 mile
Scale 1:55.000
NW
(a)
Smoky hill river - parts of sheets 3 and 4, between Solomon and Salina
1840
1870
1910
1947
1968
1984
1 mile
Scale 1:55.000
Holly
bank
Swettenham
bridge
Twemlow
bend
0 0.25 0.5
SE
NW
SE
Historical courses
500 m
(d)
Figure 3 Examples of meander changes from compilations of historical evidence. (a) Historical compilations of the courses of Republican, Saline, Solomon and Smoky Hill Rivers in Kansas, USA.
Reproduced with permission from Dort, W., 2009. Historical Channel Changes of the Kansas River and Its Major Tributaries. American Geographical Society, New York, 80 pp. (b)(d) Historical
compilations of the River Dane and Bollin, NW England (Hooke and Harvey, 1983; Hooke, 1987).
River Meandering
Color key
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
266
River Meandering
267
nk
ba
Thalweg
nd
Be ius
rad
Cross over
Surface
width W
Rm
Meander width MB
ex
Location of
point bar
Amplitude A
e
av
Co
nv
Co
nc
Meander width ML
nk
ba
Axis of bend
(a)
Meander
wavelength
Mean radius
of curvature
Concave
bank
Convex
bank
Wave
amplitude
Point of
inflection
Axis of
bend
Meander
belt axis
(b)
Figure 4 Standardized parameters of meander morphology. (a) Single meander. Redrawn with permission from Knighton, D., 1998. Fluvial
Forms and Processes a New Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (b) Meander train. Redrawn from Huggett, R., 2003. Fundamentals of
Geomorphology. Routledge, London, 386 pp.
9.16.3.2.1
Experimental modeling
268
River Meandering
j + 1
Digital
points
j + 1
j + 1
(a)
1.74 radians
bf
Mean downvalley
direction
=
c
e
g
=
b
2
g
= 1.74 sin ( 2 )
d
0.25
2
(b)
f
0.25
0.25
Channel course
2
Curvature ()
1
(c)
9.16.4
9.16.4.1
f
c
Distance (km)
River Meandering
269
Model/classification
Kondratyev (1968)
Daniel (1971)
Keller (1972)
Brice (1974)
Hickin (1974)
Hickin and Nanson (1975)
Kellerhals et al. (1976)
Hooke (1977)
Used Daniels (1971) primary elements of movement in double and triple combinations to compose a suite
of 70 models of movement. Primary elements:
extension,
translation,
rotation,
enlargement,
lateral movement, and
complex change.
Seven categories of change defined:
simple migration,
confined migration,
growth (extension),
lobing and compound growth,
retraction and cut-off,
complex changes (islands, abandonment, etc.), and
stable bends, no change.
Brice (1984)
2003). Type of channel pattern and degree of meander intensity is closely related to sediment load and to channel resistance (Schumm, 1960, 1963), with alluvial channels being
more sinuous in material with higher percentage silt-clay.
9.16.4.2
Morphological Change
It has long been recognized that meanders migrate downstream, as was well known from rivers such as the Mississippi.
It was also known that many meanders exhibit skewing and
asymmetry, but it was assumed that this was due to inhomogeneities in the floodplain material, producing differential
erosion rates in different parts of the meander train.
A major development in analysis of meanders was the
recognition of a common sequence of evolution of meander
form over time, stemming largely from the work of Brice (1973,
1974, 1984) in which he proposed the sequence of types in
Figure 8(a) and from the work of Hickin and Nanson (1975)
(Figure 8(b)) on the Beatton river in Canada, using the evidence of meander scrolls mapped from aerial photographs.
Some other sequences were produced, for example, Kellers
(1972) (Figure 8(c)) model, but elongation of meander limbs is
less widely applicable. Hickin (1978) generalized his observations into the very important conceptual model (Figure 9(a)),
which became the basis for much other empirical analysis and
270
River Meandering
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 6 (a) Photograph of flume experiment using alfalfa sprouts to simulate vegetation cover. Reproduced with permission from Braudrick, C.A.,
Dietrich, W.E., Leverich, G.T., Sklar, L.S., 2009. Experimental evidence for the conditions necessary to sustain meandering in coarse-bedded rivers.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(40), 1693616941. (b) Flume experiment showing development
of bars in a straight channel. Reproduced from Seminara, G., 2006. Meanders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 554, 271297, with permission from
Cambridge University Press. (c) Bar development in a straightened channel for comparison. From Jaeggi, M. 1984. Formation and effects of alternate
bars. Journal of Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers 110, 142156.
kinematic modeling. This shows a nonlinear increase in migration rate with curvature (decreasing r/w) to a maximum at a
critical curvature, identified as r/2w 23, and decrease in migration rates again beyond this critical curvature value. Hooke
(1997) compiled data from other rivers, showing similar
envelope curves to meander behaviors, though with some
tighter curves and higher rates at low r/w than the original
(Figure 9(b)), later also identified by Hudson and Kesel (2000)
on the Mississippi. Brice (1974), Hooke and Harvey (1983) and
others recognized the importance of compound forms, and
Hooke and Redmond (1992) and Hooke (1995b) produced the
qualitative model in Figure 8(d) of sequence through to neck
cut-off, which involves change in the position and number of
pools and riffles (Hooke and Harvey, 1983).
Debate continues on the mechanism and conditions, and
reasons for the compound development. Hooke and Harvey
(1983) showed that the compound development was associated with development of an additional riffle in the apex region as the pathlength increased beyond some critical value. It
was assumed that this leads to breakdown of secondary flow
patterns (Thompson, 1986). Lofthouse and Robert (2008)
identified a lengthening of pools with increased angular
deflection up to a critical length at which formation of
a new riffle took place. One of the few studies to examine
River Meandering
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
271
within the main channel in the period immediately succeeding cut-off. Plugs are formed in the upstream entrance to
the old channel very quickly and more slowly downstream,
but the actual dynamics and subsequent infill of the abandoned channel are related to angle and lake connectivity to
main channel and its dynamics (Citterio and Piegay, 2009).
Piegay et al. (2000) measured sedimentation rates in 39
oxbow lakes in SE France, producing a mean rate
02.57 cm yr1. This was linked to water depth and decrease
from entrance as a function of overbank frequency, which also
varies with channel geometry, Gautier et al. (2007) found on
the Beni that the functioning of abandoned branches is
strongly associated with the mobility of the main channel
rather than with flood intensity. The length of oxbow lakes is
closely related to the sinuosity of the channel (Constantine
and Dunne, 2008). Cut-offs are important in preservation of
flood history and environmental changes and some have been
dated as part of understanding floodplain chronologies (see
Chapter 9.32).
Controls and mechanisms of chute cut-offs are still
somewhat debated and not fully understood, though height of
floodplain, sediment supply, and discharge regime may be
factors. One mechanism is by formation of headcuts on the
downstream side of the bend and progression upstream (Gay
et al., 1998). Much longer-length channel avulsions can occur
on meandering rivers where the river breaks out of its course
to form a new channel down a length of valley. Explanation
and prediction of avulsion is still proving challenging (Slingerland and Smith, 1998; Aslan et al., 2005; Phillips, 2009) (see
Chapter 9.32). Both Peakall et al. (2007) and Braudrick et al.
(2009) have reproduced chute cut-offs in their hardware
models.
Overall, meandering systems are found to exhibit a wide
range of behaviors (e.g., Hooke, 2007; Seker et al., 2005;
Goswami et al., 1999), varying from meanders which are
evolving very slowly such as channels in bedrock or resistant
material, channels with highly vegetated banks or very low
slopes (e.g., Biedenharn et al., 1984; Rhoads and Miller, 1991;
Swanson, 1984) to those which are highly complex and dynamic. Timescales of the full sequence of meander evolution
have not been established for many rivers and more research is
needed. Dort (2009) suggested from the meander scroll and
cartographic evidence that meander development from initiation to cut-off on the Kansas River takes at most a few decades. Harmar and Clifford (2006) have suggested that
meander trains on the Lower Mississippi River are continually
formed and modified over a period of approximately 120
years. Hooke (2004) found that on the River Bollin bends had
evolved from low curvature to cut-off in 120150 years. The
periods for complete floodplain reworking ranged from 600 to
7000 years on streams in Devon, if current rates are simply
extrapolated (Hooke, 1980). Rates and timescales of floodplain reworking have been found to vary even in the same
region. For example, Mertes et al. (1996) calculated an alluvial
plain recycling time ranging from 1000 to 4000 years on the
SolimoesAmazon River, but Gautier et al. (2007) found that
it is about 10 times higher on the tributary Beni River. Beechie
et al. (2006) calculated a turnover recurrence interval of 60
years on meandering forested mountain river systems of the
Pacific Northwest, USA.
272
River Meandering
2
A
Compound symmetrical
Compound asymmetrical
1
B
Stages
4
Simple symmetrical
2
E
1
Simple asymmetrical
(a)
Meander scrolls
(b)
Initiation
Doubleheading
5
Riffle
Migration
Pool
Erosion
Primary flow
Depositional bar
Cutoff
Growth
Pool
Riffle
Erosion
(c)
(d)
Figure 8 Models of sequences of meander development. (a) Sequence through from simple symmetric bends to asymmetric and compound.
Reproduced from Brice, J.C., 1974. Evolution of meander loops. Bulletin of Geological Society of America 85, 581586, with permission from GSA. (b)
Elongation, skewing and compound development, based on meander scroll bar evidence on Canadian rivers. Reproduced from Figure 7 in Hickin, E.J.,
1974. Development of meanders in natural river-channels. American Journal of Science 274(4), 414442. (c) Sequence of limb elongation with
additional pool and riffles in the limbs. Reproduced from Keller, E.A., 1972. Development of alluvial stream channels: a five-stage model. Geological
Society of America Bulletin 83, 15311540, with permission from GSA. (d) Sequence of migration, growth and compound development through to cutoff, involving development of additional riffle in apex. Reproduced from Hooke, J.M., 1995b. Processes of channel planform change on meandering
channels in the UK. In: Gurnell, A., Petts, G.E. (Eds.), Changing River Channels. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 87116.
9.16.4.3
9.16.4.3.1
Meander Processes
Flow patterns and sediment movement
0.5
Grwoth period
Termination stage
1.0
273
Initiation stage
River Meandering
0
0
1.0
2.0
(a)
3.0
4.0
rm (w)
5.0
6.0
7.0
0.2
Beatton river (Hickin and Nanson)
R. Dane (Hooke)
Canadian rivers (Hickin and Nanson)
Red Rivers (Biedenham et al.)
R. Bollin
0.1
0.0
0
(b)
10
0.3
12
14
A
B
Chute cutoff
Neck cutoff
Migrating
Stabilizing
D
0.2
0.1
D
0.0
(c)
5
6
7
8
Bend curvature (r/w)
10
11
12
13
Figure 9 Relationship of rate of movement or erosion to curvature. (a) Conceptual generalization of meander development and accelerating rate
of movement with increase in bend curvature (decrease of r/w). Reproduced from Hickin, E.J., 1978. Hydraulic factors controlling channel
migration. In: Davidson-Arnott, R., Nickling, W. (Eds.), Research in Fluvial Geomorphology, Proceedings Fifth Guelph Symposium on
Geomorphology, pp. 5966. (b) Envelope curves of data of dimensionless movement rates in relation to bend curvature for several rivers.
Reproduced from Hooke, J.M., 1997. Styles of channel change. In: Thorne, C., Hey, R., Newson, M. (Eds.), Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for
River Engineering and Management. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 237268. (c) Hypothetical trajectories for different meander behavior over time.
Reproduced from Hooke, J.M., 2003. River meander behaviour and instability; a framework for analysis. Transactions of Institute of British
Geographers 28, 238253.
274
River Meandering
Outer bank
cell
Characteristic
secondary
velocity profiles
2
En Us w
g R
High
ax
High
Low
b
b
ax
+n
b
S = I Es
IN s
b pghS
b
ax
Es
Low
En
ma
Low
s
+n n
Es
High
En
+n
Bar exposed
at low flow
(b)
Thalweg
Near surface velocity
Near bed velocity
(c)
Figure 10 (a) Generalized pattern of flow in meander bends. Reproduced from Markham, A.J., Thorne, C.R., 1992. Geomorphology of gravelbed rivers. In: Billi, P., Hey, R.D., Thorne, C.R., Tacconi, P. (Eds.), Dynamics of Gravel Bed Rivers. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 433456.
(b) Channel curvature and bed topography effects on the boundary shear stress field. Reproduced from Figure 8.6 in Dietrich, W., 1987.
Mechanics of flow and sediment transport in river bends. In: Richards, K.S. (Ed.), River Channels: Environment and Processes. Blackwell, Oxford,
pp. 179227. (c) Flow field in equilibrium with bed topography in bends with well developed bars. Reproduced from Figure 8.9 in Dietrich, W.,
1987. Mechanics of flow and sediment transport in river bends. In: Richards K.S. (Ed.), River Channels: Environment and Processes. Blackwell,
Oxford, pp. 179227.
River Meandering
9.16.4.3.2
275
Bank erosion
9.16.4.3.3
276
River Meandering
9.16.4.4
9.16.4.5
River Meandering
277
9.16.5
9.16.5.1
278
River Meandering
Erodible boundary
Curvature
(banks)
(bed)
Vortex-induced
stresses
Friction
Secondary currents
(driven by curvature)
Free bars
Gravity
Bedload
Transversal
flow field
Resonance
Shoaling
(point bars)
Secondary currents
(driven by topography)
Momentum
redistribution
Topographic
steering
+
Inward
bed stresses
+
Outward shifting of
bulk of the stream
Bank erosion
Phase lag in the longitudinal flow
phase lag in the secondary currents
Excess bank
stress
Downstream migration
and skewness
Figure 12 Components and interrelationship of factors influencing meander development. Redrawn from Camporeale, C., Perona, P., Porporato,
A., Ridolfi, L., 2007. Hierarchy of models for meandering rivers and related morphodynamic processes. Reviews of Geophysics 45(1), RG1001,
with permission from AGU.
River Meandering
9.16.5.2
Conceptual Analyses
At a more conceptual level, underlying much of the interpretation of morphology and morphological changes in fluvial geomorphology is the theory of equilibrium and
adjustment. It is assumed that channel form, as measured by
variables such as meander wavelength and channel width, is
adjusted to the discharge and sediment load delivered to it.
This is evidenced by statistically stable relations from
279
280
River Meandering
9.16.5.3
River Meandering
100
281
Flow direction
50
0
50
(a) 100
100
Flow direction
50
0
50
(b)
100
100
200
300
400
x
500
600
700
800
Figure 13 Example of output from numerical simulation model. Numerical simulations beyond cut-off: (a) subresonant case, b 9, t0.3,
ds0.005, E 10 8, dune covered bed. (b) superresonant case, b 13, t0.3, ds0.005, E10 8, dune-covered bed. Note the formation
of compound loops. Also note that sinuosity decreases as development proceeds. In the subresonant case: red 2.67; green 3.08; black thin1.80;
black thick 1.69. In the superresonant case: red 2.98; green 2.22; black thin 2.32; black thick 2.45. (Calculations kindly provided by S.
Lanzoni, 2005.) Reproduced from Seminara, G., 2006. Meanders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 554, 271297, with permission from Cambridge
University Press.
9.16.6
282
River Meandering
9.16.6.1
Future Research
Current debates still surround some issues and are the subject
of ongoing research or provide the agenda for future research.
9.16.7
Conclusions
River Meandering
References
Abad, J.D., Garcia, M.H., 2008. Bed morphology in Kinoshita meandering channels:
Experiments and numerical simulations. River, Coastal and Estuarine
Morphodynamics: RCEM 2007 1 and 2, 869875.
Abad, J.D., Garcia, M.H., 2009. Experiments in a high-amplitude Kinoshita
meandering channel: 2. Implications of bend orientation on bed
morphodynamics. Water Resources Research, 45.
Ackers, P., Charlton, F.G., 1970. Slope and resistance of small meandering channels.
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Paper 73623, 349370.
Allen, J.R.L., 1970. Studies in fluviatile sedimentation a comparison of finingupwards cyclothems, with special reference to coarse-member composition and
interpretation. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 40(1), 298323.
Alonso, A., Garzon, G., 1994. Quaternary evolution of a meandering gravel-bed river
in central Spain. Terra Nova 6(5), 465475.
Alvarado-Ancieta, C.C., Ettmer, B., 2008. Fluvial morphology and erosion in abrupt
curves of the Ucayali River, Peru. Ingenieria Hidraulica En Mexico 23(4), 6990.
Andrle, R., 1994. Flow structure and development of circular meander pools.
Geomorphology 9(4), 261270.
Andrle, R., 1996. Measuring channel planform of meandering rivers. Physical
Geography 17(3), 270281.
Anthony, D.J., Harvey, M.D., 1991. Stage-dependent cross-section adjustments in a
meandering reach of Fall River, Colorado. Geomorphology 4(34), 187203.
Aslan, A., Autin, W.J., Blum, M.D., 2005. Causes of river avulsion: insights from
the late Holocene avulsion history of the Mississippi River, USA. Journal of
Sedimentary Research 75(4), 650664.
Aswathy, M.V., Vijith, H., Satheesh, R., 2008. Factors influencing the sinuosity of
Pannagon River, Kottayam, Kerala, India: an assessment using remote sensing
and GIS. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 138(13), 173180.
Bagnold, R.A., 1960. Some aspects of the shape of river meanders. US Geological
Survey Professional Paper 282-E.
Bak, P., 1996. How Nature Works. Springer (Copernicus), New York, 205 pp.
Bak, P., Chen, K., 1991. Self-organised criticality. Scientific American 264, 2633.
Bak, P., Tang, C., Wiesenfeld, K., 1987. Self-organised criticality: an explanation of
I/f noise. Physical Review Letters 59, 381384.
Bartholdy, J., Billi, P., 2002. Morphodynamics of a pseudomeandering gravel bar
reach. Geomorphology 42(34), 293310.
283
Bathurst, J.C., Thorne, C.R., Hey, R.D., 1977. Direct measurements of secondary
currents in river bends. Nature 269(5628), 504506.
Beechie, T.J., Liermann, M., Pollock, M.M., Baker, S., Davies, J., 2006. Channel
pattern and river-floodplain dynamics in forested mountain river systems.
Geomorphology 78(12), 124141.
Beeson, C.E., Doyle, P.F., 1995. Comparison of bank erosion at vegetated and nonvegetated channel bends. Water Resources Bulletin 31(6), 983990.
Bennett, S.J., Simon, A., Kuhnle, R.A., 1998. Temporal variations in point bar
morphology within two incised river meanders, Goodwin Creek, Mississippi.
Water Resources Engineering 1 and 2, 14221427.
Biedenharn, D., Raphett, N., Montague, C., 1984. Long-term Stability of the
OuchitaRiver. In: Elliott, C.M. (Ed.), River Meandering, Proceedings of the
Conference Rivers 0 83, New Orleans, LA, pp. 126137.
Blanckaert, K., 2009. Saturation of curvature-induced secondary flow, energy losses,
and turbulence in sharp open-channel bends: laboratory experiments, analysis,
and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research-Earth Surface, 114.
Blanckaert, K., de Vriend, H.J., 2004. Secondary flow in sharp open-channel bends.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics 498, 353380.
Blanckaert, K., De Vriend, H.J., 2005. Turbulence structure in sharp open-channel
bends. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 536, 2748.
Blondeaux, P., Seminara, G., 1985. A unified bar bend theory of river meanders.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics 157(AUG), 449470.
Bluck, B.J., 1971. Sedimentation in the meandering River Endrick. Scottish Journal
of Geology 7, 93138.
Bradley, C., Smith, D.G., 1984. Meandering channel response to altered flow regime
Milk River, Alberta and Montana. Water Resources Research 20(12), 19131920.
Braga, G., Gervasoni, S., 1989. Evolution of the Po river: an example of the
application of historic maps. In: Petts, G.E., Moller, H., Roux, A.L. (Eds.),
Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe. John Wiley and
Sons, Chichester, pp. 113126.
Brasington, J., Rumsby, B.T., McVey, R.A., 2000. Monitoring and modelling
morphological change in a braided gravel-bed river using high resolution GPSbased survey. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25(9), 973990.
Braudrick, C.A., Dietrich, W.E., Leverich, G.T., Sklar, L.S., 2009. Experimental
evidence for the conditions necessary to sustain meandering in coarse-bedded
rivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America 106(40), 1693616941.
Brice, J.C., 1973. Meandering pattern of the White River in Indiana an analysis.
In: Morisawa, M. (Ed.), Fluvial Geomorphology. Binghamton State University,
New York, pp. 178200.
Brice, J.C., 1974. Evolution of meander loops. Bulletin of Geological Society of
America 85, 581586.
Brice, J.C., 1977. Lateral migration of the middle Sacramento River, California.
USGS Water Resources Investigation 77-43, 51 pp.
Brice, J.C., 1982. Stream Channel Stability Assessment. Federal Highway
Administration Report RHWA/RD-82/021, 41 pp.
Brice, J.C., 1984. Planform properties of meandering rivers. In: Elliott, C.M. (Ed.),
River Meandering, Proceedings of the Conference Rivers 0 83, New Orleans, LA,
pp. 115.
Bridge, J.S., 1992. A revised model for water flow, sediment transport, bed
topography, and grain-size sorting in natural river bends. Water Resources
Research 28, 9991013.
Bridge, J.S., 2003. Rivers and Floodplains. Blackwell, Oxford, 491 pp.
Bridge, J.S., Jarvis, J., 1976. Flow and sedimentary processes in meandering River
South Esk, Glen-Clova, Scotland. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 1(4),
303336.
Burckhardt, J.C., Todd, B.L., 1998. Riparian forest effect on lateral stream channel
migration in the glacial till plains. Journal of the American Water Resources
Association 34(1), 179184.
Burge, L.M., Smith, D.G., 1999. Confined meandering river eddy accretions:
sedimentology, channel geometry and depositional processes. Fluvial
Sedimentology 28, 113130.
Camporeale, C., Perona, P., Porporato, A., Ridolfi, L., 2005. On the long-term
behavior of meandering rivers. Water Resources Research 41(12).
Camporeale, C., Perona, P., Porporato, A., Ridolfi, L., 2007. Hierarchy of models for
meandering rivers and related morphodynamic processes. Reviews of
Geophysics 45(1), RG1001.
Camporeale, C., Perucca, E., Ridolfi, L., 2008. Significance of cutoff in meandering
river dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research-Earth Surface 113(F1).
Carey, W.C., 1969. Formation of floodplain lands. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,
ASCE 95.
Carlston, C.W., 1965. The relation of free meander geometry to stream discharge
and its geomorphic implication. American Journal of Science 263, 864885.
284
River Meandering
Ebisemiju, F.S., 1994. The sinuosity of alluvial river channels in the seasonally wet
tropical environment-case-study of river elemi, southwestern Nigeria. Catena
21(1), 1325.
Elliott, C.M. (Ed.), 1984, River Meandering, Proceedings of the Conference Rivers
0
83, New Orleans, LA, 1036pp.
Engelund, F., 1974. Flow and bed topography in channel bends. Journal of the
Hydraulics Division, ASCE 100, 16311648.
Erskine, W., McFadden, C., Bishop, P., 1992. Alluvial cutoffs as indicators of former
channel conditions. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 17, 2337.
Federici, B., Seminara, R., 2003. On the convective nature of bar instability. Journal
of Fluid Mechanics 487, 125145.
Ferguson, R.I., 1975. Meander irregularity and wavelength estimation. Journal of
Hydrology 26, 315333.
Ferguson, R.I., Parsons, D.R., Lane, S.N., Hardy, R.J., 2003. Flow in meander
bends with recirculation at the inner bank. Water Resources Research 39(11).
Fisk, H.N., 1944. Geological Investigation of the Alluvial Valley of the Lower
Mississippi River. Mississippi River Commission, Vicksburg, MI.
Frascati, A., Lanzoni, S., 2009. Morphodynamic regime and long-term evolution
of meandering rivers. Journal of Geophysical Research-Earth Surface,
114.
Frascati, A., Lanzoni, S., 2010. Long-term river meandering as a part of chaotic
dynamics? A contribution from mathematical modelling. Earth Surface Processes
and Landforms 35(7), 791802.
Friedkin, J.F., 1945. A Laboratory Study of the Meandering of Alluvial Rivers. US
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Frothingham, K.M., Rhoads, B.L., 2003. Three-dimensional flow structure and
channel change in an asymmetrical compound meander loop, Embarras River,
Illinois. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28(6), 625644.
Furbish, D.J., 1988. River-bend curvature and migration how are they related.
Geology 16(8), 752755.
Furbish, D.J., 1991. Spatial autoregressive structure in meander evolution.
Geological Society of America Bulletin 103(12), 15761589.
Fuller, I.C., Large, A.R.G., Milan, D.J., 2003. Quantifying channel development and
sediment transfer following chute cutoff in a wandering gravel-bed river.
Geomorphology 54(34), 307323.
Gautier, E., Brunstein, D., Vauchel, P., et al., 2007. Temporal relations between
meander deformation, water discharge and sediment fluxes in the floodplain of
the Rio Beni (Bolivian Amazonia). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
32(2), 230248.
Gay, G.R., Gay, H.H., Gay, W.H., Martinson, H.A., Meade, R.H., Moody, J.A., 1998.
Evolution of cutoffs across meander necks in Powder River, Montana, USA.
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23, 651662.
Gilvear, D., Winterbottom, S., Sichingabula, H., 2000. Character of channel planform
change and meander development: Luangwa River, Zambia. Earth Surface
Processes and Landforms 25(4), 421436.
Gomez, B., Marron, D.C., 1991. Neotectonic effects on sinuosity and channel
migration, Belle Fourche River, western South-Dakota. Earth Surface Processes
and Landforms 16(3), 227235.
Goswami, U., Sarma, J.N., Patgiri, A.D., 1999. River channel changes of the
Subansiri in Assam, India. Geomorphology 30, 227244.
Guneralp, I., Rhoads, B.L., 2008. Continuous characterization of the planform
geometry and curvature of meandering rivers. Geographical Analysis 40(1),
125.
Guneralp, I., Rhoads, B.L., 2009. Empirical analysis of the planform
curvaturemigration relation of meandering rivers. Water Resources Research,
45.
Gurnell, A.M., 1997. Channel change on the River Dee meanders, 19461992, from
the analysis of air photographs. Regulated Rivers-Research & Management
13(1), 1326.
Gurnell, A.M., Downward, S.R., Jones, R., 1994. Channel planform change on the
River Dee meanders, 18761992. Regulated Rivers-Research & Management
9(4), 187204.
Gurnell, A., Peiry, J.-L., Petts, G., 2003. Using historical data in fluvial
geomorphology. In: Kondolf, G.M., Piegay, H. (Eds.), Tools in Fluvial
Geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester.
Harden, D.R., 1990. Controlling factors in the distribution and development of
incised meanders in the central Colorado plateau. Geological Society of America
Bulletin 102(2), 233242.
Harmar, O.P., Clifford, N.J., 2006. Planform dynamics of the Lower Mississippi
River. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31(7), 825843.
Harmel, R.D., Haan, C.T., Dutnell, R., 1999. Bank erosion and riparian vegetation
influences: Upper Illinois River, Oklahoma. Transactions of the Asae 42(5),
13211329.
River Meandering
285
Hooke, J.M., Yorke, L., 2011. Channel bar dynamics on multi-decadal timescales in
an active meandering river. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 36,
19101928.
Hooke, R.L.B., 1975. Distribution of sediment transport and shear-stress in a
meander bend. Journal of Geology 83(5), 543565.
Howard, A.D., 1992. Modelling channel migration and floodplain sedimentation in
meandering streams. In: Carling, P.A., Petts, G.E. (Eds.), Lowland Floodplain
Rivers. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 141.
Howard, A.D., Hemberger, A.T., 1991. Multivariate characterisation of meandering.
Geomorphology 4, 161186.
Howard, A.D., Knutson, T.R., 1984. Sufficient conditions for river meandering: a
simulation approach. Water Resources Research 20, 16591667.
Hudson, P.F., Kesel, R.H., 2000. Channel migration and meander-bend curvature in
the lower Mississippi River prior to major human modification. Geology 28(6),
531534.
Huggett, R., 2003. Fundamentals of geomorphology. Routledge, London, 386 pp.
Hughes, M.L., McDowell, P.F., Marcus, W.A., 2006. Accuracy assessment of
georectified aerial photographs: implications for measuring lateral channel
movement in a GIS. Geomorphology 74(14), 116.
Ikeda, S., Parker, G. (Eds.), 1989. River meandering. AGU Water Resources
Monograph 12, 485.
Ikeda, S., Parker, G., Sawai, K., 1981. Bend theory of river meanders 1. Linear
development. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 112(Nov), 363377.
Jackson, R.G., 1975. Velocity-bed-form-texture patterns of meander bends in lower
Wabash River of Illinois and Indiana. Geological Society of America Bulletin
86(11), 15111522.
Johannesson, H., Parker, G., 1989. Velocity redistribution in meandering rivers.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 115(8), 10191039.
Julian, J.P., Torres, R., 2006. Hydraulic erosion of cohesive riverbanks.
Geomorphology 76, 193206.
Kale, V.S., 2005. The sinuous bedrock channel of the Tapi River, Central India: its
form and processes. Geomorphology 70(34), 296310.
Kalkwijk, J.P.T., deVriend, H.J., 1980. Computation of the flow in shallow river
bends. Journal of Hydraulic Research 18, 327342.
Kawai, S., Julien, P.Y., 1996. Point bar deposits in narrow sharp bends. Journal of
Hydraulic Research 34(2), 205218.
Keller, E.A., 1972. Development of alluvial stream channels: a five-stage model.
Geological Society of America Bulletin 83, 15311540.
Kellerhals, R.M., Church, M., Bray, I., 1976. Classification and analyisis of river
processes. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE 102, 813829.
King, P.B., Schumm, S.A. (Eds.), 1980. The Physical Geography of William Morris
Davis. Geo Books, Norwich.
Kinoshita, R., Miwa, H., 1974. River channel formation which prevents downstream
translation of transverse bars. Shinsabo 94, 1217.
Klein, M., 1985. The adjustment of the meandering pattern of the lower Jordan
River to change in water discharge. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
10(5), 525531.
Knighton, A.D., 1972. Changes in a braided reach. Bulletin of the Geological
Society of America 83, 38133822.
Knighton, A.D., 1973. Riverbank erosion in relation to streamflow conditions, River
Bollin-Dean, Cheshire. East Midland Geographer 5, 416426.
Knighton, D., 1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes a New Perspective. Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
Kondolf, G.M., 2006. River restoration and meanders. Ecology and Society 11(2),
313330.
Kondratyev, N., 1968. Hydromorphic principles of computations of free
meandering and signs and indexes of free meandering. Soviet Hydrology 4,
309335.
Lagasse, P.F., Zevenbergen, L.W., Spitz, W.J., Thorne, C.R., 2004. Methodology
for predicting channel migration. NCHRP Web-Only Document 67 (Project 2416). Report prepared for TRB (Transportation Research Board of the National
Academies of the US) http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w67.pdf
Lancaster, S.T., Bras, R.L., 2002. A simple model of river meandering and its
comparison to natural channels. Hydrological Processes 16(1), 126.
Lane, S.N., 2000. The measurement of river channel morphology using digital
photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record 16(96), 937957.
Langbein, W., Leopold, L.B., 1966. River meanders theory of minimum variance.
US Geological Survey Professional Paper 422-H.
Lapointe, M.F., Carson, M.A., 1986. Migration patterns of an asymmetric
meandering river: the Rouge River, Quebec. Water Resources Research 22,
731743.
Larsen, E.W., Fremier, A.K., Girvetz, E.H., 2006. Modeling the effects of variable
annual flow on river channel meander migration patterns, Sacramento River,
286
River Meandering
River Meandering
Rowland, J.C., Lepper, K., Dietrich, W.E., Wilson, C.J., Sheldon, R., 2005.
Tie channel sedimentation rates, oxbow formation age and channel
migration rate from optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) analysis of
floodplain deposits. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30(9),
1161q1179.
Ruther, N., Olsen, N.R.B., 2007. Modelling free-forming meander evolution in a
laboratory channel using three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics.
Geomorphology 89(34), 308319.
Schattner, I., 1962. The Lower Jordan Valley. Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Schumm, S.A., 1960. The shape of alluvial channels in relation to sediment type.
US Geological Survey Professional Paper 352-B.
Schumm, S.A., 1963. Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on the Great Plains. Geological
Society of America Bulletin 74, 10891100.
Schumm, S.A., 1977. The Fluvial System. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 338 pp.
Schumm, S.A., 2005. River Variability and Complexity. Cambridge University Press,
220 pp.
Schumm, S.A., Kahn, H.R., 1972. Experimental study of channel patterns.
Geological Society of America Bulletin. 83, 17001755.
Seker, D.Z., Kaya, S., Musaoglu, N., Kabdasli, S., Yuasa, A., Duran, Z., 2005.
Investigation of meandering in Filyos River by means of satellite sensor data.
Hydrological Processes 19(7), 14971508.
Seminara, G., 2006. Meanders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 554, 271297.
Seminara, G., Zolezzi, G., Tubino, M., Zardi, D., 2001. Downstream and upstream
influence in river meandering. Part 2. Planimetric development. Journal of Fluid
Mechanics 438, 213230.
Shams, M., Ahmadi, G., Smith, D.H., 2008. Sensitivity of flow and sediment
transport in meandering rivers to scale effects and flow rate. Environmental
Engineering Science 25(5), 747756.
Shepherd, R.G., 1972. Incised river meanders evolution in simulated bedrock.
Science 178(4059), 409411.
Shi, C.X., Petts, G., Gurnell, A., 1999. Bench development along the regulated,
lower River Dee, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24(2),
135149.
Simon, A., Curini, A., Darby, S.E., Langendoen, E.J., 2000. Bank and near-bank
processes in an incised channel. Geomorphology 35(34), 193217.
Slingerland, R., Smith, N.D., 1998. Necessary conditions for a meandering-river
avulsion. Geology 26(5), 435438.
Smith, C.E., 1998. Modeling high sinuosity meanders in a small flume.
Geomorphology 25(12), 1930.
Speight, J.G., 1965. Meander spectra of the Angabunga River. Journal of Hydrology
3, 115.
Stolum, H.H., 1996. River meandering as a self-organization process. Science
271(5256), 17101713.
Stolum, H.H., 1998. Planform geometry and dynamics of meandering rivers.
Geological Society of America Bulletin 110(11), 14851498.
Struiksma, N., Olesen, K.W., Flokstra, C., Devriend, H.J., 1985. Bed deformation in
curved alluvial channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research 23, 5779.
Sun, T., Meakin, P., Jossang, T., 2001. A computer model for meandering rivers
with multiple bed load sediment sizes 2. Computer simulations. Water
Resources Research 37(8), 22432258.
Sun, T., Meakin, P., Jossang, T., Schwarz, K., 1996. A simulation model for
meandering rivers. Water Resources Research 32(9), 29372954.
Swamee, P.K., Parkash, B., Thomas, J.V., Singh, S., 2003. Changes in the channel
pattern of River Ganga between Mustafabad and Rajmahal, Gangetic Plains since
18th century. International Journal of Sediment Research 18, 219231.
Swanson, J.E., 1984. Tazlina River meanders loop: a case history, In: Elliott, C.M.
(Ed.), River Meandering, Proceeding of the Conference Rivers 0 83, New Orleans,
LA, pp. 231239.
Tal, M., Paola, C., 2007. Dynamic single-thread channels maintained by the
interaction of flow and vegetation. Geology 35(4), 347350.
Termini, D., 2009. Experimental observations of flow and bed processes in largeamplitude meandering flume. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 135(7),
575587.
287
Thompson, A., 1986. Secondary flows and the pool-riffle unit: a case study of the
processes of meander development. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 11,
631641.
Thorne, C.R., Hey, R.D., 1979. Direct measurements of secondary currents at a river
inflection point. Nature 280(5719), 226228.
Thorne, C.R., Lewin, J., 1979. Bank processes, bed material movement and
planform development in a meandering river. In: Rhodes, D.D., Williams, G.P.
(Eds.), Adjustments of the Fluvial System. George Allen and Unwin, London, pp.
117137.
Thorne, C.R., Tovey, N.K., 1981. Stability of composite river banks. Earth Surface
Processes and Landforms 6(5), 469484.
Thorne, S.D., Furbish, D.J., 1995. Influences of coarse bank roughness on flow
within a sharply curved river bend. Geomorphology 12(3), 241257.
Tiegs, S.D., Pohl, M., 2005. Planform channel dynamics of the lower Colorado
River: 19762000. Geomorphology 69(14), 1427.
Timar, G., 2003. Controls on channel sinuosity changes: a case study of the Tisza
River, the Great Hungarian Plain. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(20),
21992207.
Tooth, S., Brandt, D., Hancox, P.J., McCarthy, T.S., 2004. Geological controls on
alluvial river behaviour: a comparative study of three rivers on the South African
Highveld. Journal of African Earth Sciences 38(1), 7997.
Tooth, S., McCarthy, T.S., Brandt, D., Hancox, P.J., Morris, R., 2002. Geological
controls on the formation of alluvial meanders and floodplain wetlands: the
example of the Klip River, eastern Free State, South Africa. Earth Surface
Processes and Landforms 27(8), 797815.
Trimble, S.W., 2008. The use of historical data and artifacts in geomorphology.
Progress in Physical Geography 32(1), 329.
Tubino, M., Repetto, R., Zolezzi, G., 1999. Free bars in rivers. Journal of Hydraulic
Research 37(6), 759775.
Tubino, M., Seminara, G., 1990. Free forced interactions in developing meanders
and suppression of free bars. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 214, 131159.
Uribelarrea, D., Perez-Gonzalez, A., Benito, G., 2003. Channel changes in the
Jararna and Tagus rivers (central Spain) over the past 500 years. Quaternary
Science Reviews 22(20), 22092221.
Whiting, P.J., Dietrich, W.E., 1993a. Experimental studies of bed topography and
flow patterns in large-amplitude meanders. 1. Observations. Water Resources
Research 29(11), 36053614.
Whiting, P.J., Dietrich, W.E., 1993b. Experimental studies of bed topography and
flow patterns in large-amplitude meanders. 2. Mechanisms. Water Resources
Research 29(11), 36153622.
Wolfert, H.P., Maas, G.J., 2007. Downstream changes of meandering styles in the
lower reaches of the River Vecht, the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of
Geosciences Geologie En Mijnbouw 86, 257271.
Wolman, M.G., Brush, L.M., 1961. Factors controlling the size and shape of stream
channels in coarse, noncohesive sands. US Geological Survey, Professional
Paper 282-G, 183210.
Zeng, J., Constantinescu, G., Blanckaert, K., Weber, L., 2008. Flow and bathymetry
in sharp open-channel bends: experiments and predictions. Water Resources
Research 44(9).
Zhang, B., Ai, N.S., Huang, Z.W., Yi, C.B., Qin, F.C., 2008. Meanders of the Jialing
River in China: morphology and formation. Chinese Science Bulletin 53(2),
267281.
Zhang, B.S., Fu, J.M., 2003. Training direction for meandering lower Yellow River.
Proceedings of the First International Yellow River Forum on River Basin
Management, Vol. Ii, pp. 299305.
Zolezzi, G., Guala, M., Termini, D., Seminara, G., 2005. Experimental observations
of upstream overdeepening. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 531, 191219.
Zolezzi, G., Luchi, R., Luchi, R., Tubino, M., 2009. Morphodynamic regime of
gravel bed, single-thread meandering rivers. Journal of Geophysical ResearchEarth Surface, 114.
Zolezzi, G., Seminara, G., 2001. Downstream and upstream influence in river
meandering. Part 1. General theory and application to overdeepening. Journal of
Fluid Mechanics 438, 183211.
288
River Meandering
Biographical Sketch
Janet Hooke is Professor of Physical Geography in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of
Liverpool, UK. She obtained her BSc from Bristol University and her PhD from Exeter University. She is a fluvial
geomorphologist specializing in research on river meanders and river channel changes, particularly the spatial and
temporal dynamics of morphological changes on event to historical timescales, the impact of hydrological
variations and the analysis of sediment processes and fluxes. In addition to publishing more than 80 research
papers, books, and book chapters, she has advised on environmental management of rivers and catchments,
especially in relation to erosion and flooding. She has managed more than 30 research projects, including
Coordinator of an EU project on combating land degradation. She works in both semiarid and humid fluvial
systems. In 2009, she was awarded the Busk Medal by the Royal Geographical Society of UK for her field research
into river systems and their conservation and for demonstrating the contribution of physical geography to
environmental management, conservation, and policy. She is a past Chair of the British Society for
Geomorphology.