You are on page 1of 21

Ac<vity

1: Mapping of Port Container Terminal


Energy Prole
GREENCRANES
GREEN Technologies and Eco-Ecient Alterna<ves for
CRANES and Opera<ons at Port Container Terminals
Project code: 2011-EU-92151-S
TEN-T Annual Call 2011
Intermediate InfoDay Valencia, 29th May 2013

Consor<um:

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY

HOW MUCH ENERGY?

WHERE IS THE ENERGY?

3. CARBON FOOTPRINT
4. CONCLUSIONS

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 2

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY

HOW MUCH ENERGY?

WHERE IS THE ENERGY?

3. CARBON FOOTPRINT
4. CONCLUSIONS

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 3

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

Introduc<on
Port Container Terminals have been studied with the aim of obtaining their energy proles
and the global carbon footprint produced, taking into account the ac4vi4es carried out by
the whole group of machinery and equipment involved.
The aim is to characterise PCTs energy proles by means of the evalua4on of the energy
performance of their ac4vi4es and processes, thus quan4fying their impact in terms of GHG
emissions.

How much energy is consumed?

Where is the energy consumed?

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 4

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY

HOW MUCH ENERGY?

WHERE IS THE ENERGY?

3. CARBON FOOTPRINT
4. CONCLUSIONS

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 5

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

Methodology
Study developed taking as a reference the years 2011 and 2012
Classica4on of port machinery and equipment considering technical
specica4ons
Electrical consump4on by type of machine and equipment
Fuel consump4on by type of machine and equipment
Calcula4on of associated Green-House Gas Emissions (GHG) derived from
electrical and fuel consump4on expressed in CO2eq
Activity 1:
Energy Profile
Base Scenario

Activity 2:
Evaluation of
Alternatives
How much can we
improve the base
scenario?

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Activity 3: Pilots
and
Demonstrations

Feasibility
Demonstra<on
Page 6

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

Methodology
Container Terminal Machinery and Equipment

Ship-to-Shore Crane

Reefer Containers

Rubber Tyred Gantry


Crane (RTG)

Terminal Tractor

Oces

Reach Stacker

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Lightning

Empty Forkli`
Page 7

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY

HOW MUCH ENERGY?

WHERE IS THE ENERGY?

3. CARBON FOOTPRINT
4. CONCLUSIONS

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 8

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


How Much Energy? Electrical Consump<on

12,522,629 kWh (43%)


11,006,280 kWh (37%)

80%

4,801,013 kWh (15%)


1,815,477 kWh (5%)
30,145,399 kWh (30.1 GWh)

X 3,000 (10,000 kWh / year)


Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 9

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


How Much Energy? Fuel Consump<on

4,049,138 L (58%)
2,245,147 L (32%)

90%

611,460 L (9%)
80,819 L (1%)
6,986,564 L
X 4,000 (1,300 L / year)

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 10

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


How Much Energy? Energy Eciency vs. Opera<ons

How does energy eciency aects costs in port opera4ons?


2,60 L / mov
1,18 L / mov
685,000

603,799
mov

1,100,000
RTG A.1

RTG A.2

685,000 L

RTG B.1

RTG B.2

RTG C.1

755,538
mov

RTG C.2

Energy eciency criteria can be considered as one more decision-making


instrument within the general opera4ve model of TPCs

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 11

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY

HOW MUCH ENERGY?

WHERE IS THE ENERGY?

3. CARBON FOOTPRINT
4. CONCLUSIONS

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 12

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


Where is the Energy?

TOS

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 13

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


Where is the Energy?

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 14

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


Where is the Energy?

> 700.000 KWh

26A

500.000 700.000 KWh

26B

< 500.000 KWh

1F
2F
3F
4F
5F
6F
7F
8F
9F

10
F

1E
2E
3E
4E
5E
6E
7E
8E
9E
10E
11E
12E
13E
14E
15
E

1D
2D
3D
4D
5D
6D
7D
8D
9D
10D
11D
12D
13D
14D
15D

22B

1C
2C
3C
4C
5C
6C
7C
8C
9C
10C
11C
12C

1B
2B
3B
4B
5B
6B
7B
8B
9B
10B
11B
12B

1A
2A
3A
4A
5A
6A
7A
8A
9A
10A
11A
12A

13C
14C
15C

13B
14B
15B

13A
14A
15A

22A

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

23B
23A
24A
24B

29
A

Page 15

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY

HOW MUCH ENERGY?

WHERE IS THE ENERGY?

3. CARBON FOOTPRINT
4. CONCLUSIONS

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 16

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


Carbon Footprint
Carbon Footprint is a useful indicator for all kinds of organiza4ons to measure their
environmental impact in terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)

Energy
Consumption

CO2
Emissions

Emissions
Coefficients

Carbon
Footprint

CO2eq
Emissions

CH4 and N2O

Production

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Kg. CO2eq / TEU

Page 17

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


Carbon Footprint Calcula<on. Results

TOTALS NCTV, TDT AND KOPER


RTGs 35%
Terminal Tractors 22%
Reefer Containers 13%

70%

Carbon Footprint (Electricity)


4.15 Kg CO2eq / TEU
Carbon Footprint (Fuel)
7.57 Kg CO2eq / TEU

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

11.7

Kg CO2eq / TEU

Page 18

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY

HOW MUCH ENERGY?

WHERE IS THE ENERGY?

3. CARBON FOOTPRINT
4. CONCLUSIONS

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 19

Ac<vity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Prole


Conclusions
Port Container Terminals are huge energy consumers, especially on those energy sources based
on fossil fuels. Average values show a yearly fuel consump4on of nearly 7 million fuel litres (in form
of diesel oil) and 30 GWh of electricity consump4on including the three par4cipant terminals.
From the economic point of view, the general increase of energy prices is aec4ng port
installa4ons, represen4ng every day more a signicant cost which reduces their compe<<veness.
In terms of environmental impact, the use of the current fuels in a non-stop opera<ve model
generates a great amount of GHG emissions, with an es4ma4on of nearly 25,000 CO2eq tonnes
derived from the use of diesel oil at the three par4cipant PCTs in 2012.
Concerning social impact, port installa4ons are usually located near populated ci4es and urban
areas, especially in the Mediterranean. Port opera<ons aects nearby popula<on as direct GHG
emissions (derived from diesel oil) are locally deployed, not only CO2, but also other pollutant and
toxic gases like N2O, Sulphur compounds and suspension par<cles.
Eorts to reduce fuel consump<on and GHG emissions produced by RTGs, yard tractors and
reach stackers are strongly recommended.

Green Technologies and Eco-ecient Alterna4ves for Cranes and Opera4ons at Port Container Terminals

Page 20

For more informa<on: greencranes@fundacion.valenciaport.com

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!


GREENCRANES, AN ACTION DEVELOPED THANKS TO:

Consor<um:

You might also like