Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Health and safety, like any other system for managing the way your organisation works, must be
planned and implemented effectively. Effective management will ensure that health and safety is
fully integrated into the organisations overall operations - just as production, finance, personnel
and quality control are.
The aim is to create policies and procedures that:
recognise that accidents, ill-health and incidents result from management control deficiencies and
need not simply be the fault of individual employees
minimise financial losses due to avoidable unplanned events or legal action
identify that developing a culture supportive of health and safety is vital if adequate control of risks
is to be achieved
ensure a systematic approach to identifying risks and allocating resources to control them
support human resource development
sustain quality initiatives directed at continuous improvement.
encourage a safety culture throughout the organisation, and
assure compliance with the law.
Safety culture
An effective safety culture involves commitment to safety from top managers and line managers,
includes the workforce, and takes into account any special needs of those it affects. It is a culture
of working safer and smarter, not harder or with more difficulty. A good safety culture turns health
and safety into a living thing.
Safety culture must be developed to become an integral part of the normal daily operation
changing the environment rather than the individuals. It is not an optional add-on, which can be
ignored or short-cut when it suits. It is a pro-active culture and should not be proscriptive in its
application.
Developing a safety culture uses conventional management methods such as:
supplying relevant information, tools and equipment
providing adequate training, and
obtaining co-operation from the workforce (motivation and reward).
In short, talk to your staff, listen to them, and use the information they give you to develop and
grow the culture.
Training helps develop a health and safety culture in an organisation and is important at all levels
within a company, including top management. Training should be relevant to the health and safety
requirements of the work performed and it should be updated regularly.
Legal obligations
Employers, including the self-employed, and employees have general duties to comply with:
'Health and safety at work etc act 1974' (HSAW) to ensure the health, safety and welfare of those
affected by work activities
'Management of health and safety at work regulations 1999' (management regulations), to
manage the factors that adversely affect health and safety.
Failure to comply with these and a wide diversity of more specific regulations can result in action
by the regulators (the HSE or your local authority environmental health officer) and could lead to
prosecution and fines in the magistrates court or (in serious cases) the Crown Court.
In addition to the criminal law outlined above, employers have a common law duty of care to
those affected by their work activities. Actions for negligence (with resulting compensation) tend
to be more costly to employers than criminal prosecutions. The legal action is taken by the
individual affected, rather than by the HSE or local authority.
Failure to satisfy legal obligations may have these outcomes:
claims for compensation in the civil courts: claims can run into tens of thousands of pounds for
simple slips, trips and falls. The TUC notes that every year, 30 times as many civil proceedings
than criminal prosecutions are taken (the success rate for claimants in civil cases is around 95%).
Unions took on 54,655 new cases in 1999 and concluded 51,936 during the year, claiming a total
of 320million from employers and their insurers
legal costs arising from convictions in the criminal courts: the average fine for a case brought by
the HSE is 6,250 and by local authorities, 4,595 (1999/2000). The record health-and-safety fine
is 1.5million, made against Great Western Trains following the Southall crash. On average,
around 72% of HSE prosecutions were successful in 2000/01, although in previous years it has
been as high as 86%
Moral duties
Every good employer wants to keep his workforce, customers and local community healthy and
safe from any adverse consequences of his work activity. This implies all efforts will be made to
remove or reduce the risks of any property damage, pain and suffering that may occur from the
result of occupational accidents and diseases.
HSE research shows that the second most important driver on small business employers (after a
desire to obey the law) is fear of injury to someone at work. As well as the bonds of closer
personal relationships in small business, there is also the fact that individuals tend to play specific
roles, making their absence through sickness or injury more difficult for a small business to cover.
Financial objectives
Management of costs is of prime importance to any organisation and can be significantly reduced
by improving health and safety performance costs obvious and hidden. These costs occur from:
reputation: an organisations reputation can be damaged and contracts may be lost if you have a
poor health and safety record. Remember you will appear on the HSEs enforcement database if
you are successfully prosecuted, or are subject of an enforcement notice (see:
www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/index.htm)
lost production: down-time through accidents or shortage of staff due to illness come straight off
'the bottom line' (profit margins are drastically reduced). This includes staff retraining and
recruitment costs
insurance costs: insured costs cover injury, ill health and damage. Organisations with a poor
health and safety record may be refused employers liability insurance, forcing closure of the
business
accidents or ill health: losses to business and costs for healthcare (supported by taxpayers) due
to accidents and ill health runs into billions of pounds every year.
The HSE estimates that employers incur costs of around 2.5 billion a year from workplace
injuries and work-related ill health, and between 1.4 billion and 4.5 billion a year from avoidable
accidental events that do not lead to injury.
These costs represent around 4-8% of all UK industrial and commercial companies' gross trading
profits or between 143 and 297 per person employed.
Many of these costs are not insured. Case studies show that uninsured costs were eight to 36
times above the costs of insurance premiums paid. These costs include product and material
damage, plant and building damage, tool and equipment damage, legal costs, expenditure on
emergency supplies, clearing site, production delays, overtime working and temporary labour,
investigation time, supervisor's time diverted, clerical effort, fines, and loss of
expertise/experience.
Improving health and safety performance could, therefore, provide considerable economic gains
to individual employers as well as society at large.
statement remains current and to be informed about any significant health and safety failures, etc.
training records
inspection reports
accident reports, including the first-aiders report
occupational ill-health, including health surveillance records
suppliers data sheets for hazardous substances
user manuals and specifications for application and use affecting materials, plant and machinery
minutes of health and safety committee meetings.
How long should we keep health and safety records?
There is no straightforward answer to this, however there are some rules of thumb!
Many records related to employee health must be retained for a statutory minimum period of time
generally forty years. This applies where there has been exposure to hazardous substances
which required health surveillance of the workers concerned (eg, lead, asbestos, isocyanates,
carcinogens, etc), or to noise, vibration and radiation (the latter has a 50 year minimum record
retention requirement).
Where an organisation holding health records is wound-up, the records should be passed to the
local office of the Employment Medical Advisory Service (EMAS).
Other types of records should generally be held for (say) six years. This period coincides with the
limitation of period that a case can be brought in the civil courts claimants may require you to
disclose your records, and (in any event) you must disclose relevant records when denying
liability for a claim.
Written safety schemes
Written schemes are required for a variety of statutory inspections of hazardous plant and
equipment, notably pressure systems, lifts and lifting gear, laser equipment, etc.
These schemes are prepared by engineers and other experts in the systems concerned, and you
should follow them implicitly.
Building layout and site plans
These may be required for contractors or emergency services. They may include:
underground services: gas, water, electricity, etc
building construction plans
electrical wiring plans
plant and equipment layouts
escape routes
boundaries of common or shared areas
chemical process workflows.
Information can be provided in whatever form is most suitable for your circumstances. For
example, it can be provided as:
posters or notices displayed in the workplace
written information supplied to employees
video or audio tapes
verbally.
arrangements should be made to overcome these problems. This could include provision of
translations, use of interpreters, or substitution of symbols or diagrams for written information.
The requirement for provision of information applies to all employees, including trainees and
those on fixed-duration contracts. For young persons under school-leaving age on work
experience, basic health and safety information must also be made available to their parents
before they take up work. This information must include details of the risk assessment of the work
in which the child will be involved.
These 'competent persons' may be employees, and sole traders or members of partnerships may
appoint themselves or other partners - as long as they are competent. External consultants may
be appointed, although normally in an advisory capacity only.
Employers should be aware that they cannot delegate the legal responsibilities owed to their
employees and others. Although they are required to appoint competent persons to assist them in
health and safety management, and can delegate responsibility for managing aspects of health
and safety within their business, the responsibility remains with the employer.
In devising control measures, the following must be considered
Any areas where the planned standards are not being met should be identified for remedial
action. Suitable benchmarks (or performance standards) should be set to assess performance
with that of businesses to which the company aspires.
The types of systems that can be used to monitor health and safety performance include:
Active monitoring systems:
measure health and safety performance on a routine basis; eg, spot checks by a supervisor
documents relating to the promotion of the health and safety culture should be periodically
examined
premises, plant and equipment should be systematically inspected
health surveillance and environmental monitoring should be established to check the
effectiveness of health control methods and to detect early signs of harm to health.
Reactive monitoring systems:
identify where health and safety standards are not being met, by monitoring for failures in the
systems - such as accidents, cases of ill health (work-related sickness), damage to property, etc.
Reporting and response systems:
ensure that monitoring information is evaluated by people competent to identify situations which
create an immediate risk to health or safety, as well as longer term trends. They must have
sufficient authority to ensure that appropriate remedial action is taken
the board of directors should regularly consider reports on health and safety performance.
Investigation systems:
priority is given to incidents which indicate the greatest risk identification of both the immediate
and the underlying causes of events. Information reaches management with sufficient authority to
start remedial action, including organisational and policy changes. Adequate analysis of all
collected data to identify common features or trends and initiate improvements at an
organisational level
arrangements should be established to investigated cases of occupational ill-health
arrangements should be established for recording and investigating complaints relating to
occupational health and safety
arrangements should be established for recording and investigating accidents that cause property
damage
arrangements should be established for recording and investigating incidents with the potential to
cause injury, ill-health or loss.
Auditing methods
The policy must be periodically audited, as should the:
arrangements for organising health and safety
adequacy of the risk control systems (and compliance thereof)
active and reactive monitoring systems.
Regular auditing of health and safety systems can identify whether they have deteriorated or
become obsolete. Auditing needs to be comprehensive and to examine over time all the
components of the health and safety management systems in an organisation. Various methods
of auditing can be used, but these can be broadly divided into two approaches:
'vertical slice' auditing - examining one specific aspect of health and safety; eg, emergency
arrangements or fire safety to see if it meets all the management requirements
'horizontal slice' auditing - examining one particular element of the health and safety management
system in detail; eg, an in-depth examination of the process of defining health and safety policy or
planning
It is important that the appropriate surveillance methods are adopted and, in order to ensure this,
it may be necessary to seek medical advice. It may also be appropriate to introduce more than
one surveillance technique, for example, monitoring sickness records as well as the accident
book.