You are on page 1of 11

graphene2004

graphene

nanomaterial

sp 2

12004

GeimNovoselov

[2]

2010

Carbon

0.142mm

0.123mm

1[1]

A.K. Geim et al., Nat. Mater.


2 0 1 3 11 N o . 1 0 8

61

C60
1996 Curl, Kroto, Smalley:
Nobel Prize in Chemistry

Carbon
nanotube

1991 Ijima

Grapehen
2004 Geim, Noveselov:
Discovery of graphene

2(Carbon nanomaterial)[1]
A.K. Geim et al., Nat. Mater.

mechanical flexibility

mechanical exfoliation

reduced graphene oxide


liquid phase exfoliation

epitaxial growth

62

chemical vapor depositionCVD

electrochemical exfoliation

GeimNovoselov

20cm 2 Vs[3]

suspended

(1)(2)

graphene

(3)

3(a)(b)

>1m 2

VsSiGaAs

2013 11 No.108

basal plane

Young's Modulus

1,100 Gpa

Fracture Strength

125Gpa

Mechanic Strength

100~400Gpa

Thermal Conductivity

5,300W/mK(in Plane)
6~30W/mK(C-axis)

5300 WmK[5]

2630 m 2 g

Thermal Stability in Air

450~650 C

Specific Capacitor

531F/g

graphene flake

Mobility of Charge Carriers

200,000cm2/Vs

Specific Surface Area

2,630m2/g

Transparency

97%

linear dispersion

[6]

3(d)

2.3[4]

(b)

107

106

105

-1

(d)
light transmittance(%)

(c)

n(1011cm-2)

(cm2 V-1s-1)

(a)

104

100

3(a) (b)
(c)
(d)
[3-4]

98

96

25

distance(m)

50

K. I. Bolotin et al., Solid State Commun.

2 0 1 3 11 N o . 1 0 8

63

1.

NMP
DMF5

2.

ultrasonication

1959Broide

[8]

Hummers

[9]2008

graphene flake

XuHummers

graphene oxideGO[10]

oxygen functional groups

<1

basal planeedge

um

Mechanical exfoliation
(research,
prototyping)

CVD

Quality

(coating, bio, transparent)


conductive layers,
electronics,
photonics)

SiC
(electronics,
RF transistors)

Molecular
assembly
(nanoelectronics)
Liquid-phase exfoliation
(coating, composites,
inks, energy storage,
bio, transparent conductive layers)

Price (for mass production)

4[6]

64

2013 11 No.108

K. S. Novoselov et al., Nature

Graphite

1. Graphite intercalation
Compounds (GICs)

3. Electrochemical
intercalation

2. Sonication in
organic solvents

Surfactants
stabilization

Highest monolayer
yield ~ 50%
Highest monolayer
yield ~ 90%

Complete
exfoliation to GNS

Depostion of graphene sheets onto substrate

5(ultra-sonication)
[7]
K. P. Loh et al., J. Mater. Chem.

[14]6(b)

epoxyC=Ohydroxyl

C-OHcarboxylCOOH

carbonylC-O

[16]

6(c)

CHxOH

thermal annealinghydrazine

vapor

700 oC

1000 o C

reduced graphene

oxiderGO[15]

7(d)

2 0 1 3 11 N o . 1 0 8

65

(a)

Graphite

(b)

Graphite
oxide

GO
dispersion
GO-host
solution
GO film

rGO
dispersion

rGO film

(c)

rGO

rGO-host
solution
rGO composite film

6(a) (b) (c)[11-13]


G. Eda et al., Adv. Mater.

(a)

(c)

(b)

(d)

7(a)(b)X-ray
(d)[16]
S. Stankovich et al., Nature

66

2013 11 No.108

graphene

ink9

solution processed

210 ohmsq

fabrication

96

3.

4.

SiC

2 0 11

900-1000 o C

[17]8

H2Ar)

17 cm 2

)CH radicals

Vs

nucleation

domain

(a)

Graphite

Bilayered graphene

(b)

Graphene lnk

(c)

8(a)(b)(c)
[17]
C. Y. Su et al., ACS Nano

2 0 1 3 11 N o . 1 0 8

67

(c)

(d)

105
Sheet resistance (Ohm/sq)

(a)

As prepared

T~96%

104
103

Acid treated
400oC annealed

102
101
1

(b)

9(a)(b)(c)
(d)[17] C. Y. Su et al., ACS Nano

68

10

2010

Roll-to-Roll

production[21]30

[19]

12

2011

2009X.Li

[22]

[20]

grain boundary

90

11

transfer-free process

2013 11 No.108

13

CVD[27-28]

Copper Oxide

1000 C, CH4/H2

Copper

14

LED

[23][25]

10
(domain)

[18]

X. Li et al., Nano Lett.

Graphene

PMMA
Cu etching

Cu

PMMA

Remove
of PMMA

SiO2 substrate

11

X. Li et al., Nano Lett.

2 0 1 3 11 N o . 1 0 8

69

Praphene on
polymer support

Polymer support

Target substrate

Graphene on Cu foil

Cu etchant

Released
polymer support

Graphene on target

12[21]
B. Sukang et al., Nature Nanotech.

SiO2/Si
Cu

carbon atoms diffuse


through grain boundary

graphene
remove top-layer graphene
and Cu

13[22]

forming underlying graphene

M. Chhowalla et al., Nature Chem.

14:
[23][24]
[25][26]
B. Z.Jang et al., Nano Lett.

70

2013 11 No.108

(SiC)

(Ni, Cu)

10-100m

< 2 mm

< 1 m

>4

>6

> 20 m

[1] A.K. Geim et al., Nat. Mater., 6,183 (2007)

[14] C. Hontoria-Lucas et al., Carbon, 33, 1585 (1995)

[2] K. S. Novoselov et al., Science , 306, 666 (2004)

[15] J. Ito et al., J. Appl. Phys., 103, 113712 (2008)

[3] K. I. Bolotin et al., Solid State Commun., 146,

[16] S. Stankovich et al., Nature, 442, 282 (2006)

351 (2008)

[17] C. Y. Su et al., ACS Nano, 4, 5285 (2010)

[4] R.R. Nair et al., Science, 320,1308, (2008)

[18] X. Li et al., Nano Lett.,9,4268, (2009)

[5] A. A. Balandin et al., Nano Lett. , 8, 902 (2008)

[19] A.Reina et al., Nano Lett., 9, 30(2009)

[6] K. S. Novoselov et al., Nature, 192, 490 (2012)

[20] X. Li et al., Science, 324, 1312(2009)

[7] K. P. Loh et al., J. Mater. Chem.,20,2277 (2010)

[21] B. Sukang et al., Nature Nanotech.,5,574, (2010)

[8] B. C. Brodie et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London,

[22] C. Y. Su et al., Nano Lett., 11, 3612, (2011)

149, 249 (1959)

[23] Y. Zhong et al., Nature Commu., 3, 827(2012)

[9] J. William et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80, 1339

[24] C.Y. Su et al., Nanotechnology, 22, 185309(2011)

(1958)

[25] B. Z.Jang et al., Nano Lett.,11, 3785(2011)

[10] Y. Xu et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130, 5856 (2008)

[26] Y. M. Lin et al., Science, 332, 1294 (2011)

[11] G. Eda et al., Adv. Mater.,22,2392 (2010)

[27] J. Kim et al., Appl. Phys. Lett.,98,091502(2011)

[12] H. He et al., Chem. Phys. Lett., 287, 53 (1998)

[ 2 8 ] T. K o b a y a s h i e t a l . , A p p l . P h y s . L e t t . , 1 0 2 ,

[13] M. Chhowalla et al., Nature Chem. (2010)

23112(2013)
E-mail: cysu@ncu.edu.tw

2 0 1 3 11 N o . 1 0 8

71

You might also like