Professional Documents
Culture Documents
04.
05.
06.
a) The Society does not own the members Flat (ownership property). The
Society cannot have a say (whatsoever) nor decide on the type of Tenant
that could be allowed to stay in the Society. It is the sole discretion of the
Flat-Owner (member) to rent his property out on rent /lease, under the
appropriate terms and conditions prescribed by the Law. ONLY the flat
owner can decide the type of tenant he wants to rent out his premises, BUT
within the parameters of Law (i.e. cannot rent out his premises for
commercial or illegal activities and so on).
b) A Society has no legal jurisdiction to refuse residing rights to a Tenant,
under any circumstances, especially in a flat owned by its member. This is
a legal fact, decided in various orders by the High Court and the Supreme
Court.
c) A Society cannot refuse a member from keeping a Tenant, even if the
member is a defaulter or whatever. The maximum a Society can do is to
inform the local Police Station, about any illegal activities being carried out
in the members flat, by the Tenant or the Member. Nothing more. Even
if the Flat-Owner (Member) has not taken permission from the Society for
keeping a Tenant, in his own Flat, it will not amount to any illegality, nor can
the Tenant be classified as a "Trespasser".
d) Some nefarious MC's have assumed the role of "investigating" the
Tenants, by conducting interviews of the Tenants. Such interviews or
assessment of the Tenants are illegal.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
routine feature amongst Society Members, to bicker and fight for petty
things, which includes, Ogling, Bitching, Parking, Drunkenness, Gambling,
Spitting Pan juice, Loud music, Abuses & Dadagiri, misappropriating
members funds, egoistic power-struggle and what-not's.
b)
On the Contrary, the Tenants who being non-owners of the rented
premises, are usually more humble and subdued, keep unto themselves
and never interfere in the affairs of the Society or any of its members.
a)
b)
c)
d)
11.
also "illegal & invalid", leading to animosity and discontent in the Society,
which also means "failure of the Cooperative Movement". AS IT IS, the
Society or the MC or the GB is a "nobody" or say "does not have the
"Capacity or Capability" to decide the legalities of such things for which
there are various Laws available. The Society MC or the GB are not "Lok
Sabha" members or Parliamentarians who are empowered to pass Laws.
b) If ignorant & nuisance GB resolutions have their whimsical ways in a
Cooperative Housing Society, then one can also expect that the ignorant
GB may pass resolutions for compulsory marriage between the members
(as is a custom in some Indian culture) .OR. "compulsory sale" of flats in
case the owner becomes a Widow. This is more so since some nefarious
MC's and their cronies, are in a way, controlling the strings in a GB
meeting.
12.
13.
MH Govt. GR No. 20081104172832001 of 01st August,
2001:
BESIDES, the Maharashtra Governments GR No. 20081104172832001
Dated 01st August, 2001, on 10% Non Occupancy Charges, the Coop.
Dept., has made no provision for Penalty and /or Penal Action under the
Cooperative Laws, on those Society Mg. Committees, who dictatorially
collect more than 10% as Non Occupancy Charges, from the helpless