Professional Documents
Culture Documents
166]
On: 28 February 2013, At: 05:57
Publisher: Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Homosexuality
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wjhm20
To cite this article: Joseph R. G. DeMarco (2007): Power and Control in Gay Strip Clubs, Journal of Homosexuality, 53:1-2,
111-127
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v53n01_05
IN THE CLUBS
Power and Control in Gay Strip Clubs
Downloaded by [181.164.194.166] at 05:57 28 February 2013
Joseph R. G. DeMarco
Philadelphia and Montral
SUMMARY. The gay strip club is a place in which more than displays
of male beauty take place. The mix of customers, performers, liquor,
and nudity results in fascinating dynamics. Of interest in this article are
the power relationships and issues of control played out both among
and between strippers and customers. Based on extensive participant
Joseph R. G. DeMarco lives and writes in Philadelphia and Montral and has been a
correspondent for the Advocate, In Touch, and the New York Native. As well, he has
been the editor for the Weekly Gazette, New Gay Life, and Il Don Gennaro. His work
has appeared in gay papers around the country including the Philadelphia Gay News
(PGN) and the Boston Gay Community News. In 1983, his article, Gay racism, was
awarded the prize for excellence in feature writing by the Gay Press Association and
was anthologized in Black men, white men (Gay Sunshine Press), Mens lives (Macmillan),
and We are everywhere (Routledge). Several of his stories have been anthologized in
Quickies, Quickies 2 and Quickies 3 (Arsenal Pulp Press) and in Men seeking men
(Painted Leaf Press). He is currently the editor of Mysterical-E (www.mystericale.com)
and the Lavender Raven (www.lavenderraven.com), and is concentrating on completing
the first novel in his mystery series. His Web site is www.josephdemarco.com. Correspondence may be addressed to Joseph R. G. DeMarco, 496 N. 19th Street, Philadelphia.,
PA, 19130, United States (E-mail: joseph@josephdemarco.com).
[Haworth co-indexing entry note]: Power and Control in Gay Strip Clubs. DeMarco, Joseph R. G.
Co-published simultaneously in Journal of Homosexuality (The Haworth Press, Inc.) Vol. 53, No. 1/2, 2007,
pp. 111-127; and: Male Sex Work: A Business Doing Pleasure (ed: Todd G. Morrison and Bruce W. Whitehead)
The Haworth Press, Inc., 2007, pp. 111-127. Single or multiple copies of this article are available for a fee from
The Haworth Document Delivery Service [1-800-HAWORTH, 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. (EST). E-mail address:
docdelivery@haworthpress.com].
111
112
INTRODUCTION
The strip club is a place of special allure. On the surface, it appears to
be all sex and fluff. Desire and money swirl together making a heady
cocktail; minor sexual intimacy is traded for dollars, or so it would appear. No one can deny the strong sexual appeal of these places. In fact,
more and more bars and clubs feature dancers of some sortmostly of
the unclothed sort. Its good for business; it brings in the crowds and livens up the atmosphere. Many of us have seen what goes onor we think
we have seen what goes on. Upon closer investigation, one begins to understand that the ostensible sexual activity is not all that is taking place
in the strip club, particularly the gay strip club.
There is a dearth of literature specific to men who strip. A few exceptions include The full monty handbook (1997), an anonymously written,
tongue-in-cheek book of humorous tips on how to strip and Chippendales:
The naked truth (Kline & Bice, 1998), a dramatized biography of a heterosexual member of the Chippendales corps who was fired after engaging
in excessive drug, alcohol, and sex abuse. The majority of literature has
concentrated on women, who dominate the industry. Among them: Behind the g-string (Scott, 1996), which analyzes the world of female
strippers; G-strings and sympathy (Frank, 2002), one womans look at
her life as a stripper; Stripping in time (Jarrett, 1997), which is a history
of female burlesque/stripping and concentrates on historical figures;
Bare: On women, dancing, sex, and power (Eaves, 2002), a look back at
one womans career in stripping; and Revelations (Dragu & Harrison,
1988), which is a book of essays and recollections by two women, one
of whom is a former stripper.
Male strippers are spoken about in the sociological literature only
briefly. For example, Tewksbury (1994) has written on the workings of
In the Clubs
113
a male strip troupe and on the male stripper as working against gender
roles (1993). However, for the most part, men are studied largely as
prostitutes and porn stars. Books on male prostitution, such as Male
order (Gibson, 1995), Male prostitution (West & de Villiers, 1993), and
The Times Square hustler (McNamara, 1994) exist alongside biographical
works on gay porn stars such as Wonder bread and ecstasy (Isherwood,
1996) and Autopornography (OHara, 1997).
Male strippers,1 in general, and men who strip for men, in particular,
are largely ignored or are treated as inconsequential entertainment. The
focus of this article, power dynamics in the all-male strip club, is based
upon research completed for a book about the world of men who strip
for men, and attempts to address some of the gaps in the literature.
METHOD
This study is based on participant observation work in 24 strip clubs/
bars located in eight cities. The clubs visited ranged from the more open
and liberal such as those in Montral and Washington, D.C. to the more
restrictive (e.g., Philadelphia) as well as bars/clubs in twilight categories that find ways around the law or skate on its edge such as some in
New York, Chicago, and West Palm Beach. One-hundred and sixty
interviews were privately conducted. These took place with club workers
as well as a variety of male strippers from beginners to those who have
retired. These strippers worked not only in the cities mentioned but also
in other cities around the country and the world. Finally, additional
casual interviews were conducted with customers and club employees.
THE IMPORTANCE OF POWER
Strip clubs hold an ambiguous position even in the minds of many
people who consider themselves liberal. There appears to be an attraction/
repulsion dichotomy at work. Individuals may want to see performers
for prurient reasons, yet they may experience guilt if they feel they are
objectifying others, and/or shame if they have been conditioned to think
that these places and the people who work in or frequent them belong to
the pornographic underbelly of the community. While there can be no
doubt that such places are part of the sexual demimonde of the gay community, there is much of social scientific interest in these places and the
people who appear in them.
114
One complex point is the idea of power, its uses and the competition
for it among strippers and customers alike. An occupational analysis of
male strippers naturally leads to a question about power dynamics in
gay strip clubs because, as Foucault has said, Power is everywhere
(Aldrich & Wotherspoon, 2001).
Definitions and discussions of power vary. However, using Weber
(1993) as a referent point, I define power as having the capacity to exercise control or possessing the ability to get others to accede to ones will
for the purpose of gaining control of scarce resources. Without something to be gained, there is no need to exercise power; indeed, there is no
power relationship. Who has the power in the strip bar? How do strippers view the idea of power vis--vis other strippers and patrons? Over
the course of my research, it became evident that power games were being played consciously and subconsciously. In reviewing the material
collected, it became clear that power, in its many forms, was more
important than one might at first suspect.
What is it that shapes these games or struggles? Three main elements
seem paramount. Strippers and customers, of course, are the principals
without whom nothing would happen. But the third variable is the venue
which includes not only the physical setting (e.g., performance area) but
also the house rules and the external laws governing such places.
There is a wide variety of strip clubs across the country, from the
mundane to the exotic. Governed by differing state/provincial laws and
shaped by personal taste or the strictures of space, each venue makes
accommodations with the world around it and to the customers whom it
is committed to serving and pleasing. By far the most interesting places
are those in which interaction between customers and dancers is permitted even if the contact is minimal.
As noted by DeMarco (2002), bars which feature strippers fall into
several types. There are establishments where strippers perform on the
bar; where performances take place on a stage; where strippers dance on
both a stage and the bar; and where strippers dance on the floor, level
with the customers. This latter type is the least common. Some bars
(which can fall into any of the other categories) also offer lap dancing
areas set apart from the rest of the house by curtains or walls. In all these
types of places, physical contact is high. Some dancers, like Derrick, a
New York stripper, like bar dancing best. I love being on a bar. I love
being close to customers. Thats when you make your tips. I dont like
the stage setting. Its just too weird for me, he reports. Jeff echoes
this, You can be right there and the customers tip well. In their love
In the Clubs
115
116
In the Clubs
117
118
him seem part of the show, part of the scene to which others were only
spectators. Some customers were observed looking on in apparent envy
while others seemed unimpressed. Though this particular incident occurred at a bar in Florida, I have observed the same phenomenon in
other places.
In addition to providing limited access to their bodies and the attention
desired by some customers, strippers work at making their customers feel
special, even desirable. Goffmans (1959) work on self-presentation in
daily life is telling when applied to the strip performance and makes
some aspects of this drama understandable. As James, a Philadelphia
dancer said, Its my job to make him think my attention is only on him,
my eyes are on him. I try to make him feel like I want him, like Im
attracted to him. These comments were echoed by most of the men I
interviewed. They view themselves as performers and part of the performance is to excite the customer, to give him a fantasy and to get tips.
Since the dancers are considered attractive and desirable, the intensity
of their performance may increase, and may be reflected in their potential to earn money.
There are other resources, other sources of power and even a kind of
authority, resident in the strip club setting. For the performers, one of
these resources lies in being the best of the desirable (i.e., the stripper
who is better than all the others, who is more desirable than his fellow
workers). For the customer, it is being the chief object of attention
(i.e., the customer who can command the attention of dancers in more
intimate ways and for longer periods of time).
Within these parameters, there is a series of possible power relationships between dancer and customer; among dancers themselves; and
among customers. The latter is subtle and difficult to spot but can be
quite striking and revealing.
The performances in strip clubs consist of verbal and non-verbal exchanges between strippers and customers. There is a language of sex,
money, and power that has developed in this setting. From my observations, the interaction between the dancer and his audience is not merely
one of sexual display and gratification, nor is it concentrated solely in
the purchase of intimate moments. Something more than sexual gratification takes place. Money changes hands seemingly in trade for minimal sexual intimacy or a moments attention but, more than that, there is
a power exchangefrom dancer to customer and from customer to dancer.
Both groups use sex and money to barter for the resources they want/
need.
In the Clubs
119
How do strip clubs operate? What goes on? As noted above, there are
a variety of clubs and any number of ways for dancers to ply their trade
in these venues. The clubs in which dancer-customer interaction takes
place on a regular basis are the most typical and the ones in which power
dynamics crackle.
These formats are present in heterosexual clubs as noted by Eaves
(2002) and Frank (2002). In addition, these authors report that there is
more variety, more sexual explicitness, and more leeway permitted by
authorities in the straight setting. However, the gender trappings make
everything seem different. The roles portrayed in heterosexual clubs, as
noted by Chapkis (1997), Shteir (2004), and Wood (1998), tend to be
traditional gender roles; thus, the power dynamics themselves are often
traditional. The man is purportedly in charge and the woman is supposedly doing his bidding. However this gender role traditionalism raises
several interesting points: (1) who is really in control? (Dancers would
readily respond that they always exercise as much control as they
wish.); and (2) does the male dancer take on the weakened power stance
vis--vis the male customer? That is to say, is the male dancer, as an erotic
laborer, seen as less powerful because he is working for another persons pleasure, doing someone elses bidding for money? Eaves (2002)
claims that, as a female stripper, part of the thrill was her recognition
that she had the power to give her customers the release they desired.
Many of the male strippers interviewed echoed this sentiment.
Access to the stripper by the customer and attempts by strippers to
influence/control customers allow the power game to be played out.
Clubs in which dancers perform on the bar show the power game at its
starkest. The major relationship is between the dancer and the customer.
Customers, who desire to do so, beckon dancers to them for some
close-up time. This close-up session consists of a number of elements.
First, the dancer makes eye contact allowing the customer to know that
he has been noticed. Next, the dancer will move toward the customer
and perform for him, undulating in front of him, placing crotch and buttocks in the customers face and allowing the customer to touch or
stroke his legs or more, depending on the locale. Following this, there is
the slow descent to a squat so that the customer can place a tip on the
dancers person. This is a danger point for the performer because it provides an opportunity for maximum access to his body. This also is the
moment in which the dancer gives his full attention to the customer.
This is what the customer has waited for since the dancer began his set.
He now has the attention of the live sexual fantasy that everyone in the
bar has been watching. He has the ability to hold on to that intimate
120
In the Clubs
121
122
In the Clubs
123
customers (i.e., the performers feel that customers act as if their money
can make them do whatever the customers desire). Some dancers reported feeling offended at being offered money for sex. However, the
dancer still holds the upper hand by refusing the offer. The refusal of
moneythe core of the customers attractionamounts to a show of power
by the dancer. He has control of the situation, and not the customer,
because he can accept or reject any offer.
Money also can be given in a paternal way, which sheds light on
another aspect of power relationships in strip clubs: the paternal nature of
masculine financial power. Wood (1998), who studied two heterosexual
strip clubs in the Boston area, also saw this paternal pattern; men, she
noted, have the idea that they are providers, breadwinners, and financial
caretakers. This is particularly true of the dynamic between men and
women, despite the image the female performer presents. Wood (1998)
observed customers giving tips and gifts because, she says, they understand themselves to be contributing to the dancers financial security.
What happens to this dynamic when it operates between men? The
power to provide for the welfare of another seems to be operative only if
one of the parties is, or seems to be, in need. This can occur in the
all-male strip club particularly if the strippers image makes him seem
dependent on the kindness of clients. Some of the images which may
inspire paternal financial giving include: the little lost boy in need of
guidance; the good-looking waifish neer-do-well in need of a strong
hand; the intelligent boy with potential who is a student in need of a
patron; and finally, the potential boy-toy or trophy boy who is too
good-looking to have to provide for himself.
Despite the struggle to be on top, dancers usually have the edge. They
are controlling the show, and the bouncers are there to handle anyone
who gets out of control. Finally, the bar/club is a public venue which, in
itself, provides a modicum of control for the performers.
Can anything tip the balance in favor of the patron? Perhaps one thing
and not even this can throw a dancer who is really aware of what he is
doing. Most, if not all, gay or bisexual dancers report sexier thoughts
and feelings, and a much sexier performance when a client is attractive
to them. When this happens, the pretense peels away, and the stripper is
paying attention to someone he feels is deserving of such attention. If
that person is a good tipper, the scene is set for changing the dynamic in
favor of the customer. No dancer has reported fully losing control in
such a situation. They have reported allowing such customers to get
away with more than other clients (i.e., touching) and they often spend
more time with attractive customers. Their evident arousal is a clear
124
give-away of their feelings and puts them at a disadvantage if the customer chooses to reject or demean them. Their vulnerability at this point
is maximized.
In the Clubs
125
these virile young men desire them body and soul. Both are willing
participants in a theater that is more involving and interactive than
Broadway. Each has a part to play but only one set of actors will come
away with something tangible.
Though the casual observer might conclude that the customers seem to
be luring dancers with dollars and succeeding at keeping their attention,
this is not actually the case. Dancers gravitate toward waving dollars,
but what is it that makes these dollars wave? It is the customers craving
for attention, the desire to touch and hold the erotic performers, and the
need to feel desirable. In contrast, the dancers are working. Almost
every stripper I interviewed said they are doing a job. Some enjoy it
more than others, some put more into it than others, but all are working.
One might call them, as Chapkis (1997) has, erotic laborers. If customers mistake the performance for reality, or if a dancer crosses the line
and strikes up a relationship with a patron, the fact remains that this is
and remains a performance. A good dancer is always in control. No
matter what happens, youre always in control, said Tyler.
Control is the operative word for workers in this arena. The male
stripper who works for men may sway his hips and jiggle his flesh, but
he also must understand and exercise the subtleties of control. Control,
after all, is power and though a dancer does not want to lose control he
also does not want to destroy the customers illusion of possessing it. It
is a delicate dance. He must maneuver this complex obstacle course
without offending the customer or he risks losing tips and fans (who
become regulars bearing gifts and bringing others to the club). Male
strippers are engaged in the creation of fantasy, and they must juggle
many factors: their own personal issues, their need to please, the needs
of the customers, management pressures, local legal restrictions, limitations inherent in the physical setting, and any number of other elements
all while engaging in a most intimate performance. For the male stripper, the creation of fantasy is work. The pleasure they give and the pleasure they seem to be getting from the work is the sum and substance of
the job, but it is, for them, just a job.
NOTES
1. It should be noted that the terms stripper, male stripper, and dancer are used interchangeably as they are by the strippers themselves and other people involved in the
business.
2. The strippers body also may constitute a source of power. For example, according to
Dutton (1995), the muscled body can be a power symbol or a pleasure symbol. However,
126
I believe that in the strip club, the body represents the power of brute force and the
erotic simultaneously. Duttons (1995) thesis about the muscular body being a power
symbol resonates nicely with the current rise in popularity of the heavily muscled stripper. This popularity has created a power differential among strippers themselves. The
less built (even if perfectly shapely and lightly muscled) dancer feels inferior. There is
an evident envy of the muscle gods. Some strippers may harbor great resentment for
their ripped and rippling brothersresentment because the less developed dancers feel
they are being pushed out of the field or left with fewer performance options. Bigger
dancers get preferential treatment. In one New York bar that caters to a variety of tastes
in body types, the smaller dancers complain that the bigger guys get to perform on
better business nights. In Montral, one dancer told me that the bigger guys only
dance at night, not during the afternoon hours because they say more money is made
during the evening (9PM to 3AM). This observation is borne out by the fact that
crowds are naturally larger during those hours.
The idea of the muscled body as a power symbola representation of domination
and strengthmay or may not have a deeper significance in the world of the male stripper. I have observed that many of the more muscular dancers are heterosexual which
makes for an interesting situation, especially if these musclemen are considered the
epitome of what society considers real men. Gay customers can exercise financial
power over these representatives of real heterosexual masculinity and so money
trumps muscle in this power game.
REFERENCES
Aldrich, R., & Wotherspoon, G. (2001). Whos who in contemporary gay & lesbian
history: From World War II to the present day. New York, NY: Routledge.
Anonymous. (1997).The full monty handbook. New York, NY: St. Martins Press.
Chapkis, W. (1997). Live sex acts. New York, NY: Routledge.
DeMarco, J. R. G. (2002, March/April). The world of gay strippers. Gay and Lesbian
Review Worldwide, 12-14.
Dragu, M., & Harrison, A.S.A. (1988). Revelations. London, ON: Nightwood Editions.
Dutton, K. R. (1995). The perfectible body: The western ideal of male physical development. New York, NY: Continuum.
Eaves, E. (2002). Bare: On women, dancing, sex, and power. New York, NY: Knopf.
Frank, K. (2002). G-strings and sympathy: Strip club regulars and male desire. Durham,
NC: Duke University Press.
Gibson, B. (1995). Male order: Life stories from boys who sell sex. London, UK:
Cassell/Wellington House.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor
Books/Doubleday.
Isherwood, C. (1996). Wonder Bread and ecstasy: The life and death of Joey Stefano.
Los Angeles, CA: Alyson.
Jarrett L. (1997). Stripping in time. New York, NY: Pandora/HarperCollins.
Kline, T., & Bice, J. (1998). Chippendales: The naked truth. Mercer Island, WA: Pacifica
Books.
In the Clubs
127
McNamara, R. P. (1994). The Times Square hustler: Male prostitution in New York City.
Westport, CT: Praeger.
OHara, S. (1997). Autopornography: A memoir of life in the lust lane. Binghamton,
NY: Harrington Park Press.
Scott, D. (1996). Behind the g-string. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Shteir, R. (2004). Striptease: The untold history of the girlie show. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Tewksbury, R. (1993). Men objectifying men: The case of male strippers. In C. L.
Williams (Ed.), Doing womens work: Men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 168-181).
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tewksbury, R. (1994). A dramaturgical analysis of male strippers. Journal of Mens
Studies, 2, 325-342.
Weber M. (1993). Basic concepts in sociology. New York, NY: Citadel Press.
West, D. J., & de Villiers, B. (1992). Male prostitution. Binghamton, NY: Harrington
Park Press.
Wood, E. A. (1998, March). Paper Doll Fantasies and Inflatable Masculinities: Exchange and identity in strip club interactions. Paper presented at the Annual convention of the Eastern Sociological Association (Philadelphia, PA).
doi:10.1300/J082v53n01_05