FN7220_Coursework

by SHAIKH HASAN

FILE

70504989._FN7220_COURSEWORK.DOCX (58.21K)

T IME SUBMIT T ED

29-DEC-2014 08:19PM

WORD COUNT

SUBMISSION ID

38905397

CHARACT ER COUNT 24742

3960

Agreed! Peiyi
Yu

good structure

good

good!

good!
argument

FN7220_Coursework
GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE

GENERAL COMMENTS

77

Instructor

/100

PAGE 1

Text Comment.

Agreed! Peiyi Yu

Text Comment.

good structure

Text Comment.

good

Text Comment.

good!

Text Comment.

good! argument

PAGE 2
PAGE 3

PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8
PAGE 9

PAGE 10
PAGE 11

PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18

RUBRIC: FN7220 MARKING CRITERIA

7.6 5 / 10

BACKGROUND (20%)

8 / 10

Evidence of background reading. Comprehensively researched. Academic and prof essional Journal
articles
SCALE 1
(1)

Poorly researched. No relevant literature presented

SCALE 2
(2)

Poorly researched. Very limited relevant literature is described.

SCALE 3
(3)

Weakly researched. Limited relevant literature is described.

SCALE 4
(4)

Limited research. Use of literature limited to a f ew articles and reviews. Poor

attempt to explore literature

SCALE 5
(5)

Reasonably researched. Some over reliance on reviews or texts. Limited number of

recent or seminal articles used.

SCALE 6
(6)

Well researched. Some over reliance on reviews or texts. Many articles not f rom
recent or seminal publications.

SCALE 7
(7)

Well researched. Signif icant over reliance on reviews or texts. Could have used
more articles f rom recent or seminal publications

SCALE 8
(8)

T horoughly researched. Predominant use of primary articles. Could have used

more articles f rom recent or seminal publications

SCALE 9
(9)

T horoughly researched. Predominant use of primary articles. Many articles

presented f rom recent or seminal publications

SCALE 10
(10)

T horoughly researched. Predominant and comprehensive use of primary articles.

Many articles presented f rom recent or seminal publications.

ANALYSIS (15%)

7 / 10

Appropriate depth of analysis. Demonstrate an understanding of main academic theories

SCALE 1
(1)

Very little materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows very little
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provides very little
synthesis and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study

SCALE 2
(2)

Very f ew materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows little
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provides little
synthesis and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study

SCALE 3
(3)

Very f ew materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows very limited
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provides very
limited synthesis and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current
study

SCALE 4
(4)

A f ew materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows limited

understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provides limited
synthesis and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study

SCALE 5
(5)

"Some materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows some
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provide some
synthesis and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study "

SCALE 6
(6)

Most materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows certain
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provide certain
synthesis and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study

SCALE 7
(7)

Most materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows reasonable
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provide reasonable
synthesis and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study

SCALE 8
(8)

Most materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows suf f icient
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provide suf f icient
synthesis and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study

SCALE 9
(9)

"All materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows suf f icient
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provide synthesis
and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study "

SCALE 10
(10)

"All materials are relevant to the objectives of the study. Shows in-depth
understanding of the topics described in the reading materials. Provide synthesis
and analysis of previous research and its relation to the current study "

CRIT ICAL (20%)

8 / 10

Critical T hinking. Evidence of relevant research and analysis. Demonstrate thought processes that
examine issues outside the box and critically assess current practices and strategies
SCALE 1
(1)

No critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature presented

SCALE 2
(2)

Very little analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature presented

SCALE 3
(3)

Very limited critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature.

SCALE 4
(4)

Limited critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature, mostly

descriptive

SCALE 5
(5)

Some critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature but mostly
descriptive

SCALE 6
(6)

Certain critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature

SCALE 7
(7)

Reasonable critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature

SCALE 8
(8)

Signif icant critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature

SCALE 9
(9)

Suf f icient critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature.

SCALE 10

Comprehensive critical analysis of strengths and limitations of the literature.

(10)

EVIDENCE (10%)

8 / 10

Use of supporting data/evidence. Provide real lif e examples to support your arguments.l
SCALE 1
(1)

No relevant supporting data/evidence presented

SCALE 2
(2)

very little supporting data/evidence presented

SCALE 3
(3)

A f ew supporting data/evidence presented

SCALE 4
(4)

Limited supporting data/evidence presented

SCALE 5
(5)

Some supporting data/evidence presented

SCALE 6
(6)

Certain supporting data/evidence presented and discussed

SCALE 7
(7)

Reasonable supporting data/evidence presented and discussed

SCALE 8
(8)

Signif icant supporting data/evidence presented and discussed

SCALE 9
(9)

Suf f icient supporting data/evidence presented and discussed ef f ectively

SCALE 10
(10)

Suf f icient supporting data/evidence presented and discussed comprehensively

ST RUCT URE (15%)

8 / 10

Clarity, Structure and Ref erencing Detailed and concise, coherent and f ormal structure, f ocused and
f luent work should be demonstrated. It also should be well presented; Appropriate application of
Harvard ref erencing should be evident.
SCALE 1
(1)

Very poorly organized with most of the f ormat specif ied not adhered to. Very poor
use of language with not much accuracy in syntax, grammar and mechanics, making
most parts of explanation incomprehensible and incoherent. Very limited word
choice. Evidence of some research is present.

SCALE 2
(2)

Very poorly organized with most of the f ormat specif ied not adhered to. Very poor
use of language with not much accuracy in syntax, grammar and mechanics, making
most parts of explanation incomprehensible and incoherent. Very limited word
choice. Evidence of some research is present.

SCALE 3
(3)

Poorly organized with some of the f ormat specif ied not adhered to. Poor use of
language with limited accuracy in syntax, grammar and mechanics, making some
parts of explanation incomprehensible and incoherent. Limited word choice. A f ew
bibliography entries have inf ormation in the correct f orm and order. Citations may
be in alphabetical order. A f ew in-text citations are written in the correct f orm.

SCALE 4
(4)

Poorly organized with some of the f ormat specif ied not adhered to. Poor use of
language with limited accuracy in syntax, grammar and mechanics, making some
parts of explanation incomprehensible and incoherent. Limited word choice. A f ew
bibliography entries have inf ormation in the correct f orm and order. Citations may
be in alphabetical order. A f ew in-text citations are written in the correct f orm.

SCALE 5
(5)

Fairly organized using the f ormat specif ied. Fair use of language with some
accuracy in syntax, grammar and mechanics, making explanation mostly clear and
coherent. Some variety of appropriate word choice. Inf ormation is nearly complete,
but in the wrong f orm or order. Not in alphabetical order. Some in-text citations are
written in the correct f orm.

SCALE 6
(6)

Satisf actorily organized using the f ormat specif ied. Good use of language with
some accuracy in syntax, grammar and mechanics, making explanation mostly clear
and coherent. Some variety of appropriate word choice. Inf ormation is nearly
complete, but in the wrong f orm or order. Not in alphabetical order. Some in-text
citations are written in the correct f orm.

SCALE 7
(7)

Very good organization using the f ormat specif ied. very good use of language with
mostly accurate syntax, grammar and mechanics, making explanation clear and
coherent. Wide variety of appropriate word choice. Most bibliography entries are
complete, in the correct f orm and order. Citations are listed mostly in alphabetical
order. Most in-text citations are written in the correct f orm.

SCALE 8
(8)

Excellent organization using the f ormat specif ied. Excellent use of language with
mostly accurate syntax, grammar and mechanics, making explanation clear and
coherent. Wide variety of appropriate word choice. Most bibliography entries are
complete, in the correct f orm and order. Citations are listed mostly in alphabetical
order. Most in-text citations are written in the correct f orm.

SCALE 9
(9)

Ef f ective organization using the f ormat specif ied. Ef f ective use of language with
mostly accurate syntax, grammar and mechanics, making explanation clear and
coherent. Wide variety of appropriate word choice. Most bibliography entries are
complete, in the correct f orm and order. Citations are listed mostly in alphabetical
order. Most in-text citations are written in the correct f orm.

SCALE 10
(10)

"Very ef f ective organization using the f ormat specif ied. Very ef f ective use of
language with accuracy in syntax, grammar and mechanics, making explanation
clear and coherent. Very wide variety of appropriate word choice. All bibliography
entries are complete, in the correct f orm and order. Citations are listed in
alphabetical order. All in-text citations are written in the correct f orm. "

EMPIRICAL Q2 (20%)

7 / 10

Empirical analysis (Question 2) Data collection, experiment and f indings (20%)

SCALE 1
(1)

Experiments not attended

SCALE 2
(2)

Experiments not described. No f indings

SCALE 3
(3)

Description of experiments unclear and lacks major aspects. No links between

f indings and literature.

SCALE 4

Description of experiments lacked some major aspect. Poor links between f indings

(4)

and literature

SCALE 5
(5)

Description of experiments mostly clear, some elements lacking. Minor

inconsistencies in experimental design. Some links between f indings literature.

SCALE 6
(6)

Mostly clear description of experiments, some elements unclear. Clear links

between f indings and literature.

SCALE 7
(7)

Clear description of proposed experiments. Very clear links between f indings and
literature.

SCALE 8
(8)

Very clear description of proposed experiments. Very clear links between f indings
and literature.

SCALE 9
(9)

Clear and concise description of proposed experiments. Well developed, very clear
and concise links between f indings and literature.

SCALE 10
(10)

Clear and concise description of proposed experiments. Well developed, very clear
and concise links between f indings and literature.