Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARMY EXTENSION
COURSE S
SUBCOURSE 33
PRINCIPLES OF WAR
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
"
-, ,I
.//'
QtJE~'r)QNNA.IRE
YOUR ASSISTANCE IS NEED:F:b
CA SUBCOURSE 33, PRINCIPLES OF WAR
Are ,You satisfied with what you have lea~ried as a result "ftakirig this
subcourse? (Strike out one; if answer is "no", explain.)
(Yes)
Z.
Do you feel that this subcourse has adequately covered the purpose
prescribed for it in the introduction? (Strike out one; if answer is
"no", list that which ':'las not cover ed. )
(Yes)
3.
(No)
(No)
(No)
., /
-:1
i\:J
1 November 1959
4.
5.
List her~ any suggestions you have for making this sul;>course more
intere!ilting~ndlo~ informative;
"".
6.
'
....: . '
'
'.
,I
">..
'
'
". . '"
l : ';: ' .
.
~ . L. '
(,
; :
"
NAME
MAILlNG ADDRESS
STATE'
CITY
DATE MAILED
,.
.,
CA SUB COURSE 33
PRINCIPLES OF WAR
INTRODUCTION
Credit Hours - -
- 3
Text Assignment
Materials Required
Lesson Objective
- - - - - - - - - - None
- - - - - - - -- - - To acquaint you with the principles
o!war and their. a.pplication;a)},d to
examine some contemporary writings
tha! critically analyze the principles
o! war.
'.'::,
. "
-.:.'
.~
..
uS Navy
US Army
. British
USAF
a. Objective
Objective
Objective
b. Offensive
. Offensive
.Of:fens ive
c.
d. Unity of
,corIim.arid
'dontrol
e. Mass
'Control
Cooperation
(listed as
"separate
principles)
M~euVl'lr
!'
"
i.
Combined
arms
Economy of
~ffRrt
Economy of
I'lffort
Economy of
force
Flexibility
Flexibility
Maneuver and
:irlitilitive
:-, :"""
r,
s..irprise'
",
s:ufprise
Security
Security
"
Cooperation
Economy
, !';
;
h.
Offensive
Concentration
Mobility
Offensive
action
Concentration Concentration
of force
force
g.
Advance and
consolidation
Concentration
"
. Economy of
Selection and
maintenance
of aims
Administr ation
Simplicity
Simplicity
Soviet
c','
1,
,.:;
\'Surpri'se"
','.f, ",
:j'_~
'.I,:,.
.;
Surpiis'I'l'
SUi-prise arid
deteption
'I
Sebur'lty'
,'(
'"
Security
A'de quate
r~'s'erves
Mairitenanc'El', "d'Morale
'of1rt<frltlei.
v
v'; '"
Morijle
j.
Cf yn,'~
"~I
k.
, .'1.'
"
. )p.
1.
<,'
:'1.1
'
'A'fin'ihilation
Rea,diness
.:: -, )
,<,'-10,
""/,1;::)
:';
"
Z.
";':
i;
'
r:.;, ',',':":'.:'"
'{:",,-l.'~;:F;,n"ll~:};~,\"::;
;':~'J
,~':I
c'
;:-\L~:
;::_,>:,).ul,l~'(,:~,{:'j:)r::,):"
,.;
t,i',ijJ ,~,,'
~';.:,:"(t,~~l :':;;,';1':",
",j
r")Ji:\~'-lt,)G
.','
,.
',.
"
, ' ,
'"
:'
"
cp'ntrql1AngJ,a,,,?-~ the~.efor~,
the
;-,.. i
,".'
Necessary supplies are moved from unaffected areas to points of need and
only where such supplles are inadequate are they augmented by United
State s stipplie s.
Civil Affairs operations contribute materially to the military
operation. 'l:'heresources 'of the area are mobilized in support of our forces
as well as fo'r the satisfaction of the commander's responsibility to meet
minimum essential civilian requirements. Assistance is provided the tech
nical services in the local procurement of required supplies at a considerable
saving in time, shipping space, and, often, money. Civil Affairs elements
assist inthe procurement of port and rail facilities, communications, storage
facilities, necessary housing and utilities. They a.ssist in obtaining local
civilian labor for essential labor that would 'otherwise require the diversion
of combat troops. The extensive Civil Affairs organization functioning COn
stantly at the grasSrocits level conStitutes an effective source of informa.tion
and intelligence whie:h is of vital importance in the pursuit of combat.
9.
MANEUVER. The principle of maneuver states that one's military
resources must be positioned to favor the accomplishment of the mission.
Maneuver is the mdvement of combat power to provide the necessary mass
at the proper tim'll' arid place for a:ttaintnentof the objective. Maneuver en
hances combat power since orily through maneuver can we so position Our
military resources that they can apply their full power, or mass, at the
decisive point and time. The encirclement of some 300,000 German troops
in the Ruhr by the tis Army during World War II is an outstandirig 'example
of the principle of manettver. Maneuverls most effective when not disclosed
to the enemy. The principle" of maneuver is not limited to the movement or
maneuver of troops alone. There is maneuver of fires and maneuver of
logistics, ma:nemver of the means for controlling' areas and populations, and
maneuver of political force. In applying this p:t'inciple; time, distance,a.nd
the means and power of maneuver must be ~onsider.
Toappl)T maneuver to establish the cbncentration of forces or
mass required at the decisive point and tim.e,mobility is essential. This
mobility may be achieved by improvement in ground means but will be limited
in flexibility uhle'ss' it exploits, increasingly ,air mearisof transport. It
mearis that 'a!.r'suppl'y or even air lines of corrimuriication must be used to full
capacity routinely rather than considered as an" emergEmcy means ofs,upply.
Small, mobile, battlegroups of all arms, containing their own fire and logis
tical support, triav be isolated for longpetiods 'Qf time deep' in the enemy
rear. Their coritinuEtdexistence may' welT 'depend upon their mobility. <'
il,
10
11. SECURITY.
12
1.
GENERAL SITUATION. In June 19
Aggressor launched an
invasion of SOUTH KOREA. US Forces were~ittedpiecemeal into the
struggle as units became available. The limited number of troops availa
ble to defend the position required the assignment of large sectors to the
units in the forward positions.
SPECIAL SITUATION.
a. On 29 Aug the 1st BG, 87th Inf occupied its sector without
enemy contact (see Figure 1). Only minor guerilla activity occurred in the
area. <:;0 E, 2d Med Tk Bn, 69th Armor attac,hed to 1st BG, 87th Inf rein
forces fires of Mort Btry, 1st BG, 87th Inf.with one 105mm Aowitzer battery.
b. Col,. 1st BG, 87th Inf decided to defend the battle group sector
(16,000 yards) by utilizing platoon ~d.squad strong points. Most of these
strong points were not :t;l:),utuany supporting and several could be reached only
with difficulty. Onepl;l-tOQIJ, of tanks was attached to Co Band D. The battle
group reserve consisted of the tank company (-) and one platoon of.Co A. The
Recon Plat, 1st BG, 87th Inf was directed to maintain contact with 2d BG, 29th
Inf. The Mort Btry is in glilnersupport.
c. Weather andT'1Hain. The weather during the.plilriodis.warm
anq.<;lear. The WARRIOR Rive:l,'~s uIJ.fOrdable except at thetwao'0"1U$.indi
cated in Figure 1. At thes.e points. both vehicles and foot trooplil.frnay q;t'.oss
with some difficulty. The marshes can be crossed by foot troops with great
difficulty. Wheeled vehicles are restricted to the limited road net. Cross
country movement of truck vehicles is limited due to the rugged terrain.
d. Both friendly and Aggressor forces possess atomic weapons;
however, atomic weapons have not been employed to date. Aggressor
possesses a numerical superiority with a limited armored capability. Friend
ly forces have air superiority.
13
SITUATION CONTINUED.
prior to darkness, Col, 1st BG. 87th Inf forIned a task force by attaching
to Co C the following:
(1) Sufficient Infantry carriers to Inechanize the foot
eleInents.
(2) One tank platoon.
(3) One platoon 4.2" Inortars.
(4) Section assault gun platoon.
b.
This task force was given the Inission of breaking through
the Aggressor rear guard and seizing the division objective. 5 miles to the
west.
c.
The 'task force attacked an hour after dark and successfully
sInashed through the eneIny rear guard and overran the enemy forces re
treating along the Inain road. By Inorning (15Sep) the task force was on
the division objective.
17
1955. The views expressed in this article are the author's, Lt Col Fallwell,
and not necessarily thos,eof the Department of the Army or the US .Army
by presenting the basic factors ef, and theirinluence on, the problem and,
through the use of appropriate forms" a .sound, logical approach to the solu
incorrectly estimated. The problem itself may not be fully recognized. The
that the basic'mental reasons for poor decisions are three in number: lack
of understanding .of the problem, lack of knowledge of the factors and their
influence on the preblen'!., and incomplete knowledge and use of thought pre
though our military colleges can help provide knowledge, they can never
18
United States Naval War College terms the "natural mental process for
An orderly process?
Yes.
Sound?
Yes.
Simple? No.
ployment.
dormant powers of reasoning are awakened, and the dangell'that
19
SOLUTION OF A PROBLEM
Figure 3
20
British
Objective
Select~on and
French
Soviet
Advance and
Consolidation
Maintenance
of the Aim
Simplicity
Unity of
Command
Co-operation
Combined Arms
Offensive
Offensive Action
Offensive
Maneuver
Flexibility
Liberty of
Action
Maneuver and
Initiative
Mass
Concentration
of Force
Concentration
of Effort
Concentration
Economy
of Force
Economy of
Effort
Surprise
Surprise
Security
Security
Adequate Reserves
Maintenance
of Morale
Morale
Economy of
Force
Surprise
Surprise and
Deception
Administration
Annihilation
Figure 4
23
No one will say that British plans and orders are likely to be complicated
because they have ignored the principle of simplicity. Similarly, tactics
of the French are not defective because they profess to find only 3 princi
ples rather than the 9 United States or 10 British principles. All of the
concepts embodied in the principles are taught in all armies, but with
differences in interpretation and emphasis.
The United States official list of principles is a product of the twentieth
century. Our Field Service Regulations of 1904 are reported to have con
tained the following statement - -but not a list of principles:
"While the fundamental principles of war are neither very numerous
nor complex, their application may be difficult and must not be limited
by set rules. Departure from prescribed methods is at times necessary.
A thorough knowledge of the principles of war and their application enables
the leader to decide when such departure should be made and to determine
what methods should bring success. "
Training Regulations 10-5 of 1921 contains what is apparently the
first official list of principles, but the publication gave the names only with
out explanation and the list .was rescinded in 1928. The Field S.ervice Regu~
lations of 1923 treated the principles without naming them. Its successor,
Field Manual 100-5, Field Service Regulations, Operations, continued this
approach until our present edition of 1954 which both names and discusses
the principles.
Although our Army was apparently late in its official acceptance of
the principles, they were taught much earlier, as evidenced by General
Pershing's statement:
"But the principles of warfare as I learned them at West Point re"
main unchanged. They were verified by my experience in our Indian wars,
and also during the campaign against the Spaniards in Cuba. I applied them
in the Philippines and observed their application in Manchuria during the
Russo-Japanese War. "
In the British Army.a very similar procedure took place . General
Fuller has related how, in 1911, he read in the British. Arr~y Field Service
Regulations that "the fundamental princi}?les of war are neither vllry
numerous nor in themselves very abstruse .. "; but that he searched for
them in vain. Spurred by t4e need for valid principles, he fieUy evolved
nine principles; in. 1923, he realized the satisfaction of seeing most of them
printed in a service man\l.al. T4e origillal British principles remained sub
stantially unchanged until after World War II when two other~, ..A.dministration
24
and Maintenance of Morale, were added, due, one may guess, to the in
fluenceof Field Marshal Montgomery.
Within the United States Army, the principles of war have been
regarded as basic truths, applicable to all s'ituations, intelligent appli
cation of which will aid success. Although apparent conflicts between'
principles are recognized-,-mass and security for example - ~we teach that
a principle should be violated or disregarded only after mature considera
tion of all factors involved. The principles have never been stated as laws
of cause and effect. They represent, in fact, certain durable, proved
concepts which, in the opinion of the times, deserye emphasis over all
other concepts. Interpretation of the concepts has varied, of course, and
will doubtles'sly vary in the future.
CRITICISM OF THE PRINCIPLES
Captain Frank L. Johnson, United States Navy, wrote, "The mere
mention of the term 'principles of war' brings out the semantic beast in
certain individuals. "
As' soon as the principles were published, an argument began which
has cohtinued'unti! the present day. For every artiCle ih a service journal
which expounded the official line ,'th:ere appeared another artiCle attacking
one or more of the principles. Most'early objections were based-on the
grou.nds that the principles weCl'e a me Ie' Hstofnouns or noun substantives
which could be interpreted in many ways. Some wanted to expand the Hst.
Others - -appealing to the dictionaries - -wished to discard all which were
not basic to e'Very situation. As anexample,'Br'igad,er General Charles
M. Bundel~-formerCbmmandantofthe Commahdand Gerieril:l Staff School-
could find only five basic principles--offensive, simplicity,' objective, su
periority, and se curity. The others he thought valid as doctrine but not as
principles,
Later critics ccnotably the Naval War College and Colonel E'~ S. '
Johnston, former 'instructor and'libtariah at 'Fort Leavenworth-cattatke'd the
principles on firmer ground. While not denying their value as c'dh'c:ej:>l:s,
they Claimed the principles were not stated properly--that is, that relation
ship between: caus'e<andeIfect Was not 'shbwn;that doctririeand metllodwas
being cOhfusec!with priNciple; and 1:hatth,e label"principle" haclniisled sorrie
commande r s to believe' that thesecortceptll"iwE!1'e 'basic' rule s to be applied to
every situation. Thus .1t was said, fau'L1:yrtile i s ofabti6nil 'have been deri'ved
fromcdncepts' c!leisigned to replace, s'ucha.ultY'i'uhi s.
Cbl6hel'J6hnstort cite s thefol16Wing frdni Wotld War I on the cdnNis'fbn
I..
of' principfe' 'attd, metilod:'
~:
25
26
OBjECTivE
"Theultirp.ate objectiv,! of ail military operations is the' d~shuction
oftlle enemy's armedforces and his 'will to fight: Selection of i~ter
~ediateobjectives ~hose attainment contributes most decisiv<i!ly and
quickly to the accomplishme~t of'the ultimate objective . . . must be
based o~ . . . corp.pl,ete kn;0"fledge of th,e enem~ and the,!-ter of operations .. --"
Field Man1.la,l 100 '75, :E'ield Ser,:,ice Regu1at~pns~. Operations.
,Th,! terml'obJe<:tiv~1'has two ciistinct m:ee,ning s .. In the larger sense,
it is 'the "effect desired, " or thec'reation of a fayo~ab1e niilitiny situation.
Thi,s,we usuallyter~therp.issio':'.lnhefir~t'sense,th~ objective is
commOnt.p all military. operations .. Applied.to oft:ensive ope~ations, it
maye'the' seizure. pf ce'rtain terrain or the destruc.tion pf an enemy force;
indeellFi:.re.oRe;ra:tions, the objective rrlaybe)o deny an area or facility'
tothe~remy, o;rit'maY be sim:p1yto,n::,ahitain the integrity of a certain '. '
fOrce; Th.eRfoper seque.~.c.~ ofp1ann illg i,s t'lArstde~ermin~ the, ultimate
ITIis sian. Based
upon
this,. !.; ','one
determines
fiivorable
i;rJ.ilitary situations
..I '
' . ,. , . ,I ; .. '
: , . ,'
. .' .... "
,I"
which favor. accomplishment
of theult1mat e m1ssion.
These
situa:tions
then'
,d ,,) J J , - : . ' , '
.
1 '1. i '
,','
,
become inte,rmediate millsions .
,
~,
,"
"
:!
"
,, ,
,j...
i'
.. ' "
""..
,..
<'
,',!,
':
. .' -,./
i'
'
'
.. ..
'."
. ',
-,'
. '. ;',
.',
.",
..
.,
,"
. ',-.
'-"'"
i,
,. ,."
,-
"
;'-"
i'"
,"
'
'
laHi'
. ,
'.
'.
..
'
..
\;
: '30
." ;.~
,31
Properly
The term economy of orce has wide acceptance ah'J.bng armie's of the
world but is not always interpreted the same way . Ofie' 'iri1u:ential writer .
32
has ra~sed t4~s pr~nciple to the status of "the law of war." To the British
a!\d C.ap.adianArmies, e.conomyof force implies,. "a balanced employment
of forces and a Judicious, expenditure of all resources with the objective of
achiev~ngan effective concentration at the dedsive time' and place." Here
economy.is interpreted in the,nmeteenth century sense of "utilizing allre
sources "rather than in,the twentieth century sense of "to economize; to
save.
II
33
can
'34
seriously considered.
In solving military problems then, we can ask the following
questions.
1. Does the formulation of the missionallowfor full development
of cooperation?
2. Is the command capable of achieving the degree of cooperation
required by the proposed courses of action?
If the answer to either question is negative, then there has been an
error.
MANEUVER
"Maneuver in itself can produce no decisive results, but if properly
empl'oyed itmakes decisive results ~ossible through the application of the
principles of the offensive, mass, economy of loree, and surprise. "--Field
Manual 100 -5, F'ielcf Service Regulations, Operations.
,
'
a.
;i
:.;
'.
'; ,
,'j .'
.',
fl,i
:l'
35
','
.')
vantage?
3. What is the degree of maneuver for the"ccp:nmand relative
to that for the enemy initially and throughout the action?
SURPRISE
"Surprise, must be sought throughout the, ~ctio1l:by eVHYnJ.ean~ and
by every, echelon of, command. SUJ;prire ~iLY b~p;rogu~edby:measureswhich
deny information to the enemy ,0rd,e,Felye him. ' ',i l;ry V;a:ria,tion in the ,means
and methods employed in combat; by rapidity and power of execution; and by
the utiiization of ttlr,),'ain which appea;rs tp)~os" grtl~t <'l.iHC].l~ties,'" - _ Field
ManqaUOO~5, .l'ield Service, Regul,ation,s,,,pper"Hon,s.,
In
reality it is but a means or method for achieving com1:;lat,
s\lperiority'.
".. -<, ..
..;
,'-I
r:!,
;1
. ,.
J'
"f:
I"
pf.
'i'
qi
36
SIMPLICITY
Our 1923 Field Service Regulations state: "The task assigned to any,
unit mllst not involve a compHcated manet.lver. Simple anddire'et plans and
methods are _alone practicable in 'war ~ ,,
':.,1'
..'
,"
..
-,
.... -
,,'
'..
....
. ',,'
. .\
, : . \","
i:' : \
>
37
gani",...tion""
may re qui'\' e siW~c;i~~}J;aining ,eq,uip~eIlt'':11d c;o:qt,J;0l:, ':' C;e;r1;f:i,n, ,9per,')-ti ons
such as the raid, the night attack, and chemical warfarec;:aIJ. be xery, com
plex and difficult. Newer concepts such as amphibious, ahborne, ahd
atomic,:: warJ1J,reJ~r'''.,).lsually~t~lll':Il?rE!, .c,::QrnJ;lle,~: " ' : , i f i ,
'.
'.
."
J)
, ,
'.'
""
..,,(
,'(
,':',
::" ... .'
by removing obviously unnecessary complexities in other courses of action,
'.".',!.. '\"
j';
, y: /\.::,j i/;,
'.,~:
; e'il "
!. ;"
iiJ.!.l
"d:'~:"<,i\:",;' ,"}:b,r',;'
",
",j.:
'i
'
':;
",' ,,'-"
o!:\': .. '.'
"'L9Br,
!:'.' j,
".i:.',:\
;';0;'1'
.., ':,-1,:
_,;.j'
'1
1...
:!::C,i
;:.)')f"r'i,
l'il:
"'l')' 0, .:-,,',>
>}}J"
\i
".:"trb
i)!j'7.
"
("::
a'\'mie s
,
,
,.\
To':t3.#l.':~1.rCl.nr;l,i_l):-:t<.:t r;
:1;} '3.fl
f,,'
!)ri,b
,n'r
~HLULj:\
J:o
CD ~U)
';' i:~t
The quotation'above points out only one aspect of security. Not only
must the commander protect against surprise, he must also guard against
known enemy capabilities. In the offense, security measures are taken to
retain the initiative despite enemy counter strokes . Active security meas
ures include' secondary, attacks and the employment of reconnaissance forces
and reserves. Passive security measures are designed to limit enemy
knowledge of our activities and to minimize, damage from enemy attack.
The commander must not take counsel of his fears, however, lest he
develop a defensive attitude. "Bold action is essential to success in war. "
In the estimate of the situatiori, the problem of security arises where
our own courses of action are analyzed with respect to enemy capabilities.
Then the general nature and timing of each threat is visualized. Detailed
planning comes later.
One of the more interesting problems concerns risk, the obverse of
security. The solution, of course, depends on how much one can afford to
lose. Earlier, we stated that the suitability of any objective or course of
action depends, among other thing~, upon the degree of risk involved.
SUMMARY
In this article it has been suggested that the principles of war were
developed through man's instinctive search tor vatfd rules or guides. The
nine principles of the United States Army and those of other nations repre
sent those proved concepts or points of doctrine which, in the opiriion of
the times, deserye more emphasis than all other equally valid concepts or
doctrines. A study of the principles has made it obvious that their state
ment and even their number has, undergone steady change and refinement.
The same desire to minimize error in militarydbcfs'icins which pro-'
duced OUF principles of war, has also produced our estimate of the situa
tion which is a standard sequence for reaching tactical decisions. The
estimate directs one's attention to the influences of the factors of the situa
tion or the relati()ri~hipbei,*eencauseandeffect. Iil' b'tner sciences, these
relationships or law~ aretermed 'principles, .butnot'so in the military where
"principle" means "doctrine'." Aithoughthe war of \i!or'd's has not yet
.
terminated, the following points have emerged in the opinion of the author!i)
1.
2..
w~r
39
FM 100-5*
(1944)
FM 100-5
(1949)
Principles
of War
General
Principles
of Combat
General Principles
for
Conduct of War
Doctrines
of Combat
Principles
of War
Objective
Objective
Objective
Objective
Objective
Offensive
Offensive
Offensive (Mobility)
Offensive
Offensive
Mass
Concentra
tion of
Superior
Forces
Concentration of
Superior Forces
(Economy)
Concentration of
Superior
Forces
Mass
Economy of
Force
Economy of
Force
Surprise
Surprise
Surprise
Surprise
Surprise
Simplicity
Simplicity
Simplicity
Simplicity
Simplicity
Security
Security
Security
Security
Security
TR 10-5
(19Zl)
FSR*
(19Z3)
Economy of
Force
Maneuver
Movement
Unity of Effort
Cooperation
Unity of
Command
Quality)~*
Quality**
Fire
Superiority
NOTES:
Unity of
Command
40
1956.
CbM.s'ewitz - -have a great deal of trutb..,iri the,m. Som(%o ,them seem' 01wio1llis:
truisms, but others are open to serious question. Not only has airborne and
aton1i.c warfare' madeslome of those\:lI:oxioepts' obsolete!,:, b,-,t ,many exceptions:
are to be found to them throughout the history of warfare. Again,in the
or,dinary.classrobmp:r,esentation of t~e'pl1inciples of wail'.,." e"li/il.mples ~il'ern.ar
shalled to illustrate how battles have been won with the correct application
of the stii;ted principles, and lost through the failure to applyt'hem.Ldilx
ceptions are carefully ignored. And the exceptions are not the"kind that
pr0vetheJ rule', but ',il'dmetimes dis'proV\e it., Unfortunately bffiCel1s, indoc,. "',
trlinate'cl.and imbued with such unexceptionable principles' a';;e"likely to fail
to search for the exceptions which in a partiGular situation may be decisive.
',,/ .
:;1; <,",
41
OBJECTIVE
The im.plicatioll is that the prim.ary objective is the enem.y arm.ed
forces" Yet at the end of World War II we saw Japan surrender while a
Am.erican doctrine has tended to conform. with what Liddell Hart calls
the "Napoleoni" falliicyll that wars are to be won only by destroying the
enem.y's arm.y, 'not by occupying his c;apital or other m.ajor cities. Our'
city cab. be. so great that its los s to the enem.y m.eans the los s of the' war.
This has been tr.ue 'of Paris - -whenever Paris has fallen France has fallen.
after they entered the capital Napoleon abdicated. 'Throughout World War
I it generally was assum.ed that the Germ.an capture of Paris would m.ean
the loss of the war for the Allies. In World War II the French sued for an
It is true that victory may be won by destroying the enem.y's arm.ed forces.
But it also is nonetheless truethat som.etim.es victory m.ay be won without
destroyingt~ose,force s .. Many Am.ericans have come to equate victory with
destructiori,and they 'hold t<?the destructive principle of uncoriditiorial sur
rneder:. A,gaih, weare told that "in war there. is no substitute foi- vrctory, "
, appare,ntly mea~,ing cOmPlete destruction of the enem.y. Perhaps it is enough
for a soldier ,~onli!,illghim.se1fstrictly to m.ilitary considerations; to hold'
vict()ry as his 'o~jeCtive'. When he asc~nds to the place to urge high national
poli~ies, however, he m.lfst look beyond victoryt6 the more basic objectives
which brought his nation into war. 'The ultimate6bje'divEi'of war is not sim.ply
victory, but the wellbeing of the llation. The objective for the nation is not
the destruction of the enefuy: bU:fthe pr6tection of its own security and the
restorationofjustice, freedom, and peace. Failure tqlook beyond the im.
m.ediated",si~~ctiOIlof the enetriy'toth'e polittcar consequences is the reason
Americans llav~ found them.selv~sWin'fiingthewlit,ari.dthen losing the peace.
Was victory e~et 'more cornpietethan:'iti'Wbrld War 1I? Did it bring security
and peace?
Bec!lus,ethe"'flElm.Y,forces rerna.inedintact, many Ainericans haVe)ex
pres.sed the o;efnion 'tha;t we lost thecoMHet in Korea.' If victory meatit the
cOllqu~sl: 'otalf t-iortl,i. Korea ~nd the destruction of the CO~tinist Cllines'e
42
South Korea. That objective was achieved. Holding ourselves to the original
objective, clearly the United States and her United Nations allies won a vic
tory in Korea. In war a stalemate is a victory for the defensive.
"The ultimate objective of all m,ilit~ry ope l' il.tions "might better be
stated as being the destruction of the enemy's capability or his will to fight.
SIMPLICITY
Simplicity, ,is a principle which may offer some va.lue most of the time,
but even it is pot to be accepted unquestioningly for all occasions. If every
one had insisted on following the rule of simplicity, there probably would
have been 110 ail'borne operations during World War II. It may be argued that
airborne attacks made no decisive contributions to American battle victories.
But if they did contribute somet)ling to the successes in Sicily, Normandy,
Holland, or Corregidor, it was not because they offered the simplest of the
possible courses of action. 'On the contrary t)ley'were highly complex under
takings.
Again, the simple plan m<!'ybe too o1:)vious to the ~nemy. It was, "impos
sible" for the Japanese to move all the way down the Malay Peninsula to
Singapore - -so of course that is the v..F Y r.oute they used.
It is said that the final t~,st of a plan is its execution. ' And so it is for
that particular plan, but its SIlCCeS!! does ,not ]"ul,e Putall the alternative
plans wh~ch, m~ght h~ve been evert, more succe8$ful. Too frequently we. tlmd
tojustifyour military doctrine with t4e unassailable statement, "Well, we
won the war, <1idp~t we,?" when it is CJ.uite conceivable ~hatwith members ,and
in(iustrialrllsoUrCe!! f~J:surpassing those of the Allies, the .Germansmight
have bllen fully as succjlssful with tpei r doctrinlls of airpower, for luSt'ance,
as were tPe Britispq,n<,i Americ~ns with theirs.
,.' , .
UNI1:+ OF COMMAND
,'i-'
:."
....
'. .
,:' i
.'
"'"
'.
..."-"
"
"
,:- -'..
',0_""
, _;
'.:;
.': .
",: "
" , :,"
.',
..:
:~'
.', ' .
'.
F".'
.':.......
t. ':.
,',
44
all
'I,
: "\'. '-".
:."
'.-
',"-',-', ',}x','
45
~("':'
all
It frequently may be the case too that scarcity of supply and trans
portation facilities will make' advisable a division of forces for offensive
operations. In Ainherst'smasterliJ.l campaign against Montreal in 1760,
British forces moved by three widely separated routes - -down the Saint
Lawrence from Lake Ontario, northward by way of Lake Champlain, and
up the Saint Lawrence from Quebec. Such division of forces permitted
the advance on Montreal to begin without waiting for a concentration of all
the forces, it made use ef Widely separated supply and transportatien faci
lities without overtaxing any of them, and it cut off any French retreat to
the west.
'
47
48
might knpw very well ,that the Japanese ,ll.recapableof Jaunching an attack
anywhere ill the Pacific, but what good does that do if we cannot find out
that they aJ:~ .intending to attack Pearl Harbor? All kinds of intelligence
reports are marsha,lled to show us thi;Lt it ,had been correctly estimated
that th!l, Germ;l.nswere c;l.pable of lal,tnching a,n offensiv~ through the Ar
dennes inPecember 19~5, but what good did they do Us when we .:.vere
unable tp finq out the German intentions?, On the other hand the Germans
knew that the Allies were ca,pable of ,invading the European cost anywhere
from the Bay of Biscay to the North Sea, but they could not defend equally
everywhere, so what good did it ,clO tJ;lem? Everyone knew that, the North
Koreans were capable of attacking South Korea in 1950, but we had not
learned their intentions and we we,re surpJ:ised. Everyone knew, too, that
the Chinese were capable of attacking across the Yalu River in November
1950, but we. did not learn their intentions and were
sur,prised again.
.
,"
..
,',
... ' ,
'.
'C.':
,.'
' "
'-"
CONc<LU,SION
"
' .
" . ' , .
:. ,'0;"
,j ; .
,; ,
"
, J;
,r.. :
'(Ii,'"
by pointing out that the woord "principles" Inay have one of two Ineanings. In
what was intended by the older writersClln strategy, who often referred to
its narrower and Inore recent sense, however, the words "principles of war"
,phrases as, "the principle oLc;oncentration," Oll'the ','principle. of ,the offensive, "
50
and so on. I intend, to talk about the prinCiples of war under both concepts;
that is, first as a general body of knowledge and secondly as a particular
list of maxims, but mostly under the latter, because I think that ia what
was inte,nded in the invitation extended me.
"Military science or strategy is both the oldest and at the same time
not at all remarkable that it should be so. The fact that it is so ancient
means that its pursuit much antedates the modern scientific age, in which
every ,major department of human knowledge. ,The fa'ct ,that the di,rection of
warwaa for many centuries, the calling exclusively of'princ,es and of the
modern scientific age arrived, there was already enough that was esoteric
about the practice of war to encourage scholars, with very few exceptions,
other hand, tended to do rathe:r little writing themselves. For good and
perament. The soldier has always ,prided himself on being a man of action"
rather than of theory. He values such qualities as the ability to lead l'nen
solve ona plan of action, prefe,rahle s,imple;, "and 'to stick to it through fair
weathe,r and foul. 'These are ,rare qualities ,andnohle ones, but they are
52
53
everyone possessed. 'This list wasrescind:ed ,in 192,3. The ,Field Service
Regulations of 192,8, on the other hand, treated the principles without naming
them. It was not until the 1949 edition of Field Manual 100 -5 that we have
an American officiaTA:rmy publica:tionthat both names and discusses the
principles of war. Note that is witHin 'our present decade.
"Perhaps one reason for the'long delay in the c<l>dificationof the
principles of war'i's that the modern age is characteristically the age' of the
encapsulation of learning,' so that one may take it quickly, painles-sly, and
the:refore withoutinterfering with more important pursUits. This is the
era of the survey, course ih theCdlleges, of the Reader's Dige'ston the
newsstands, and of the one-page briefing sheets in government offices.
Mind you, I 'do not object to these things. They are unquestionably neces
sary fbi' a busy man,and,therefore presumably for' good government. I
am notoneofthos'e who believe that a little knowledge is necessarily a
dangerous thing. A little knowledge may be,valstly better than no knowledge
at all, especially since I have not observed that complete ignorance on a
subject necessarily makes inenmere humble or' cautious in their opinions
on that subject'. I have 'also' seen caseswl:>.er,eoonCliensations of a report
conta'inedmore wit and wisdom than 'the ful1,r,eport,., In,fillct, I have written
such condensations of my own 'writings. Howllver, I have ,always felt that
where a single page actually succe'eded inben'veyiilg what ha,sbeencllmtained
in twO hundred, then someone had permitted himself to ,be' awfully lax with
time and words. Certainly; when I come tocritici,z:e the principles of war,
as I shaliido p'ro!lsently, I will charge them withatteimpting. ,to pr.esent in far
too co.ndensed a form the knowledge that has been acquired through much
time and hard experience.
""j
'>;
.', ;,)
experience, as well as the vicario,us experience which one can gain from
the study of history.
"Because the principles of war are really ,commonsense propositions,
most of them apply equally to other pursuits in life, including some which
at first glance seem to be pretty far removed from war. For instance, if
a man wishes to win a maid, and especiaUy if he is not too well endowed
with looks or money , it is necessary for him to clarify in his mind exactly
what he wants with this girl--that is, the principle of the objective--and
then to practice rigorously the principles of concentration of force, of the
offensive, of economy of forces, and certainly of <;leception. Nor is it
necessarily damning to the principles of war that they are also applicable
to other pursuits. But it does being to suggest--and this is the main fea
ture of my argument--thatthes'e principles are perhaps too abstrac,t and
too general to be very r:qeaningfulin themselves, too devoid of content to
have any very specific application.
"To show you how abstract it cal'l. become, I must tell you what
happene'd to the so-called principle of "economy of for<;,es" ,sometijnes put
in the plural and sometimes in the singular , "economy of force,." W,hoever
it was who first propounded that principle in precisely that language .ob
viously had in mind the 18th and 19th century connot~tiol} of t1~e word "econo
my" which was very different from thecopotemporary connotation. Today
the word "economy" simply means economizin,g o,r, skimping, altho,ugh in
former times it 'Was much, more likely to, 'su,ggest ,shrewd hus,bandry or
shrewd u'sage.
"Thus, in its original meaning the term "economy of forces, " as ex
plained even in so recent a pook as Sir Fr,ederick Maurice's "Principles of
War," had the fOrce oian injunction to use all one's r'esou:r,<;''i',s,th,at is" not
to let any gowasted. There have Peen many battleso;r,9HlJ.pai~nswhich one
side lost because its commander, for one reaSOn or,~1]00th\;:r",l1-iledto utilize
all the resources availaMe to him. General JOe, Hooke,r IPs,t the ,pattIe of
ChanceUorsville, in spite of a trejnendousnuJ;ne:r~cakigp,e;t'iorityover Lee,
mostly because he committed les s than halt,h.is JOr.<;,eS'~9 'the battle., The
injunction to use one's forces to the,fuUi's",lil;Par:tic1,11a:J;Iy<important one in
view of the' apparently' conflicting rrequi,remento,that, jl;l enterilJ,g, battle, a
oommander. shoul<;l seEhto it thll:t he"has,cel1,tll.iJa,iI'e,ser:,es which are not com
mitted too soon;. , At the'll!PpropJ!,ilLtef,tim,ei<hC;;we~el(IJJheys hould Pe ,usecl,
unlesssucoes,a,fi,rs,t,intll~y9l}es",,Yet'Y.ou"a1'lql h,!-ye~een the principleS of
war ,ClliscussedPYJpersons: wib'lll tP,O\lghtthaU;he '''i,JilJ,inciple, of the econojnY,Rf
f01'ce:s" meantshnply that''One,a'hPulcl do:a:mHitaJt'Y job with the lea,st fQ,r:cea
necessary forthat'j'ob,. "Whehth:e, words<tlaq:)"rllm,ain the same while tj:l.Il;'
5S
56
57
those battleships had won a glorious naval victory off San Bernardino Strait,
as I think they would have done had they stayed there, who knows how much
"I should like to say a few words now about another kind of axiom or
maxim which differs from the principle with a capital "P" in that it is to
have the virtues of commonsense about it. This I shall call the "slogan. "
58
"Or take the slogan derived fromduPicq, the very brilliant officer
who met an untimely death in the first' few months of the Franco -Pruss ian ,
war. A much-quoted. statement frotn his writings was: "He will win who
has the resolution to advance." Du Picqderivedthis idea from a very
careful study of the battles of antiquity in which he discovered that the main
reason for the enormous disparities in casualties, between victor and van
quished was that the latter hadturned and led. Soldiers can't fight facing
backwards, and since those who led were not more;. leet of foot than their
opponents, they not only lost the battle but also lost tretne;.ndously in human
life. Thus, du Picq concluded that the;. one thing an army must absolutely
do in battle is face forward, thus, the slogan: "He will \\lin who has the;.
reservation of advance;.." This slogan which was repeated again and again
in the;. years following his death,beca~e the;. fixed idea 6f an e;.xtremist
school in France prior to World War 1. It was used as an exhortation for
extre;.me;. adherence to the so -called principle;. of the;. offensive, and you find
it so used in Fodi's pre -war writings. 1 one wants to find examples of the;.
ruin of nations following from too-rigid adhere;.nce to principles with a capital
"P " , one Could tarry ~whilewith the principle of the offensive, especially
with the unhappy story of France in World War 1.
"But, to give you an instance of anoth~r slogan from more recent
times, let me return to my example of Leyte Gulf. The reason Admiral
Halsey gave for rejecting the idea of staying off the San Bernardino Strait
was th<ti there was a slogan in the leet:, j''the enemy's main forces are
where his carrIers are. ',' Now, I submit that that~onception was true for
the pre ce ding two, ye ~r s of the war; but at the, time of Leyte Gulf, ,it was no
longer true. I submit also th~tiriteUigencewa$available t'o the leet which
indicated that it was rio longer true. We kn6wthe characteristics of the re
maining enemy carriers at this time, and we knew they were~uch, too puny
to be ane~fective force. We could not, Of course, knowthattl'1eywere not
everi car~yin& airplanes;but we should have known thatthemo?tplanes they
could fly ~ere' far too smail be be decisive in any sense of
wor'd. We also
,
:,'"
,
,' . '0..'
:."..
i ~:. . ',," :, ':_
had sufficient expedence toknow that the Japanese naval~ir forces at that
time afuouriied,in'~ua~ity'tonothillglike, what they ~~d!been in the first year
of the war. 1n::otl'i~l'wo'rds, at Leyte Gulf the, en~~y's. Alain force in fact lay
where hisbaiti~i!lhipswere. 'that wasjust too hard tdbelieve in view ofthe
dominance of the slogan.
'
c'':,,,
. ':"
. '. '''',
:"
,'..
all
"
","
....
,,: ", ,
,_J.- '-":-":_",
/ :.:.
the
.:'.,
. :..
..,"
"
59
'''I sh0;Uld sUbrnit1 tberefore, that on,:,. <;lithe first te~ts for a sound
strategy'is freedom from'the dominance '0 slogans. Let us rather I>tudy
,
history, the experience from which the slogan was derived. But, of course,
wh,en ~7tf~1< ,apout the virtues of rraq~!;',~rpi,li,ta:r:Y his,t?ry, le,t)ls remember
also that we are now entering a world of markedly new and therefore unpre
cedented p,;t:ob~e:nls" ,al1Cl t!),at pa"]te:xperie?cr )'Iill oft':'n be a misleading guide
for the future. But I do believe that the past studied liberally and with free
dom of spiritf"unis!J.es tp,,,,perspE1ctive,by which the future can be viewed
in a more just light. 'Anyway, witho'ut such perspective, we have nothing.
After all, what disting1,l,i(il'~el>yo~ People fron,ci'lilians is a Prr speeti'Ie based
on your own experience and that of Y01.ir predecessors. Without this per
spectiiYe,;t:':'J;1aye I;''?tp~ng, no~hing\la'Ve thecliches parade under t~,e name of
old and presumably unchanging principles. These cliches areals,? !tho~~ht
by many to give us the conclusive answers in tomorrow's problem. Would
it we'!e .so. l;f it were so,thing"j wO\lld b,e 1'0 much easier. T,hank, you very
much. fI"
A"
. ",
"~~
,'.
' , ' ,
'.'
",:(
;.":'!
60
'1)
Ii
EXERCISES
I. GENERAL SITUATION. The 80th Inf Div has recently been
activated at FORT GORDON, GEORGIA, where it is currently undergoing
training. Higher headquarters has directed that the staff officers of the
division receive refresher instruction on subjects appropriate to their
echelons of operations.
II. 'SPECIALSITUA.TION. You are Commanding General, 80th
Inf Div: The General and Special Staffs will shortly commence refresher
instruction on the fundamentals of combat. You have decided to address
this class with some introductorY,remarks relative to the principles' of
war, and youhave prepared a concise sentence which described the mean~
ing of each of the nirte principles.
DIRECTIONS. The following questions are rnultiple choice type.
Each question has only one correct answer. Indicate your choice by placing
an "X" th;rough the appropriate letter on the answer sheet.
1.
b.
c.
"
d.
2.
.'..
'.
>.
'
: -,'
'
captt1ri~f8i-(d~shutti6n of
'
""
~.
,.,
61
3.
b.
standing.
4;
d.
L,'"
62
<; ') ,r
6.
forces.
c. the use of the minimum force necessary to accomplish a
given, n),ission.
d. a philosophy stipulating that the faster the units move and
accomplish their"m.issi.ons I the smaller will be their 10s.ses and the more
effective their gains.
7.
'.'
i',;
63
b.
B.G,
a.
None
b.
Simplicity
c.
Security
d.
Economy of force
::l i'
a.
Mass
., b.
Surprise
c.
Economy of force
d.
None
None
b.
Maneuver
c.
Mass
d.
Simplicity
princip~,esof war
clid
a.
Mass
c.
Security
d.
a.
Mass
b.
Economy of force
c.
Se cur'ity
,.\
d.
I'
'
Offensive
Unity of command
j,
b.
Surprise
c.
Maneuver
d.
Simplicity
Surprise
b.
Security
c.
Offensive
d.
Maneuver
Surprise
b.
Offensive
c.
Security
d.
Maneuver
or
9~
minimum
31.
.,,/.
:)
fH_~ '.-j',\'~(:
~!(U
,\'\
\",
, ;;,i
,"',1''''
"i
- - 2
Text Assignment
Materials Required
- - - - - - - - - - None
1.
GENERAL S'~TUATION, The 80th Inf Div has recently been acti
vated at FORT GORDON, GEORGIA, where it is currently undergoing
training. Higher headquarters has directedthat thel;ltaff officers ,of the
division receive, refresher ins,tiruction, on ,subjects appropriate to,their
echelons of operations.
H.
SPECIAL 'SITUATION. You are G3, 80th Ini Div. Another sub
ject for the division's staff officer refresher course is the, "funGla,rnentalsof
the offense." You will present this subject at the second meeting of the
class,' and you,ar,e now studying available reference'sJ,o"ensur'e your under
standing of the subject.
DIRECTIONS. The following questions are multiple choice type. Each
question has onear mOre l;oue,qt, a1iliswflrs.,,!.lJiu(li,Cllite, yourchQice(s) by placing
an "X" th:rough thl'lapPrQpriat,e lEltter,(!'!) 9ntl,eanswerl;lheet.,
1.
What is the relationship between offensive fundamentals and the
principles of .war?
d'
,<\.., ,Afl,y soupd ofep.l!1iy~ ,opeJ.'ation w,i,ll efl,sure Jull,l'<Bpli<;ation
of the nine ,principles of. war.
:i"'}
I
The purpose of
a.
offen~ive
operations is
force.
d. the destruction. of the enemy's armed forces, the imposition
of the commander's will on the enemy. or the seizure of territory for
future operations.
3.
How does the direction of attack differ from the axis of a.dvance?
69
Single envelopment.
b.
7.
Single
a~d
Fire support.
b.
c.
Assignment of a maneuver"zone.
d.
Location of reserves.
d.
'!
'.'
i,
.;
Fight
70
b.
Find
c.
Finish
d.
Fix
9.
Which of the following most closely describes a difference
between the main and secondary attacks under all conditions?
a. More manpower is allocated to the main attack than the
secondaryattack(s).
b. The unit(s) making the main attack have more inherent
firepower than the unit(s) making the secondary attack(s).
c. The objective of the main attack has more tactical impor
tance than the objective(s) of the secondary attack(s).
d. The bulk of the available logistical support is allocated to
the main attack.
10.
b.
c.
d.
Final objective
b.
Zone of action
c.
d.
71
training of troops.
b.
hasty reconnaissance.
c.
d.
13. Which of the following is the most extensive effect that nuclear
weapons have had on the forms of maneuver?
a. The availability of atomic weapons may make the penetration
a more acceptable form of maneuver.
b.
c.
desirable.
b.
penetration.
b.
frontal attack.
72
c.
envelopment.
d.
turning movement.
Mission
b.
Enemy situation
c.
Terrain
d.
Troops available
13
Ii
'1
74
1"1,,,
,'i
'>~J
'F',"'.. ,~
.,'
'L.V'
:",'.';
'J
(\:
j".<:'-. ",
c t,'.'
~'i
t,ni;
~*f/r';J~f~:taq,!:J,~I.,J:e; X1T:t,i>'-\\!)
. ;q,y,':'q
j;~
l.c-;ilinr
;curi..ISgs
gnoTJB S
i~
;)'lO"J'S'}j:.' f:'~'jn()";
'~'.,
"(1
oq,'F'
:')i~;'
OJ \',:;1'
I"~
" I "
i,'
~t) fiT
75
- - - - - - - --
Materials Required
- - None
1.
GENERAL SITUATION. The 80th Inf Div has recently been acti
vated at FORT GORDON, GEORGIA, where it is currently undergoing
training. Higher headquarters has directed that the staff officers of the
division receive refresher instruction on subjects appropriate to their
echelons of operations.
II.
SPECIAL SITUATION. You are G3, 80th Inf Div. Another subject
for the division's staff officer refresher course is the "fundamentals of the
defense and retrograde." You will present thissubjeet at the third meeting
of the class, and you are now studying available references to ensure your
understanding of the subject.
DIRECTIONS. The following questions are multiple choice type. Each
question has one or more correct answers. Indicate your choice(s) by placing
an "X" through the appropriate letter(s) on the answer sheet.
1.
Double envelopment
b.
Mobile defense
c.
Position .defense
76
d.
2.
Retrograde operation
3.
4.
c.
d.
b.
c.
d.
b.
enemy.
5. . In' mbbl:1ef defense the striking force' is located a <considerable
distance in rear of the strolJ<g point system in order to
a.
b.
d.
6.
b.
c.
d.
8.
a.
b.
c.
d.
c.
d.
9.
In de~aying actions, delay on alternate positions has the ad
vantage over delay on successive positions in that it
'
a.
requires lesstroops ..
b.
c.
permits delaYC;>~llr,awiderzone.
78
d.
10.
11.
b.
c.
d.
night.
b. preferable during the hours of darkness and exceptionally
during daylight hour s.
12.
c.
d.
A delaying action is
a.
79
general outpost.
b.
combat outpost.
c.
d.
local security.
16.
is to
a.
deceive enemy.
b.
80
17.
~neJ:llY
c.
activities.
d.
b.
c.
d.
position.
18.
cover~ng force.
assembly areas.
b.
zones of action.
c.
time of attack
d.
a terrain objective.
b.
c.
d. commander has
defensive area.
',.
82
34. The striking force commander may be called upon by the higher
commander to provide small mobile security and reconnaissance forces
to operate in forward defensive area.
35. Normally, the covering forcei:s provided by division and co
ordinated by corps.
36. A disengagement is a maneuver in which a force not in contact
avoids engagement by moving away from the enemy.
37. Retrograde operations are characterized by decentralized
planning and centralized execution.
83
)
...