Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy
Christian F. Camm, BM BCh,* Cynthia A. James, PhD, Crystal Tichnell, MGC, Brittney Murray, MS,
Aditya Bhonsale, MD, Anneline S.J.M. te Riele, MD, Daniel P. Judge, MD, Harikrishna Tandri, MD,
Hugh Calkins, MD, FHRS
From the *New College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland and, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology,
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BACKGROUND Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is an inherited cardiomyopathy, characterized
by right ventricular dysfunction and ventricular arrhythmias.
Limited information is available concerning atrial arrhythmias in
ARVD/C.
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize spontaneous atrial arrhythmias in a large registry population of ARVD/C
patients.
METHODS Patients (n 248) from the Johns Hopkins ARVD/C
registry who met the diagnostic criteria and had undertaken
genotype analysis were included. Medical records of each were
reviewed to ascertain incidence and characteristics of atrial
arrhythmia episodes. Detailed demographic, phenotypic, and
structural information was obtained from registry data.
RESULTS Thirty-ve patients with ARVD/C (14%) experienced one
or more types of atrial arrhythmia during median follow-up of 5.78
(interquartile range 8.52) years. Atrial brillation was the most
common atrial arrhythmia, occurring in 80% of ARVD/C patients
with atrial arrhythmias. Patients developed atrial arrhythmias at a
mean age of 43.0 14.0 years. Atrial arrhythmia patients obtained
a total of 22 inappropriate implantable cardioverter-debrillator
shocks during follow-up. Older age at last follow-up (P o.001) and
Introduction
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy
(ARVD/C) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by
right ventricular dysfunction, ventricular arrhythmias, and an
The authors received funding from the Alexandre Suerman Stipend (to
Dr. te Riele), the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL093350
to Dr. Tandri), the St. Jude Medical Foundation, and Medtronic Inc. The
Johns Hopkins ARVD/C Program (ARVD.com) is supported by the Bogle
Foundation, the Healing Hearts Foundation, the Campanella family,
Wilmerding Endowments, and the Dr. Francis P. Chiaramonte Private
Foundation. Dr. Calkins receives research support from Medtronic and St.
Jude Medical. Address reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Hugh
Calkins, Sheikh Zayed TowerRoom 7125R, The Johns Hopkins Hospital,
1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail address: hcalkins@jhmi.
edu.
1547-5271/$-see front matter B 2013 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.
1662
Methods
Study population
The Johns Hopkins ARVD/C Program was established in
1999 with a goal of studying ARVD/C and providing care
for patients with this condition. Patients with denite or
possible ARVD/C are enrolled in a prospective registry. The
study population was identied from this registry. Inclusion
criteria for this study were registry patients who had undertaken genotype analysis and met the 2010 Task Force
Criteria (TFC) for ARVD/C.17 All registry participants
provided written informed consent. The study protocol was
approved by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Institutional Review Board.
Clinical phenotype
Detailed clinical information regarding demographics, presentation, symptom onset, and noninvasive and invasive
studies was obtained for each patient. The medical history of
each subject was obtained through review of medical
records, clinical evaluation, and patient interview. A detailed
family history was obtained through patient interview by
genetic counselors with a special interest in ARVD/C.
Comprehensive mutation testing was performed, using
commercial or research genetic testing, on all patients
included in this study.18 Genetic testing included sequencing
of ve ARVD/C-associated desmosomal genes (PKP2,
DSC2, DSG2, DSP, JUP) and the PLN and TMEM43 genes.
The diagnosis of ARVD/C was based on the presence of
major and minor diagnostic criteria according to the revised
TFC 2010.17 The proband was dened as the rst person in a
family in whom ARVD/C diagnosis was conrmed (i.e.,
fullled TFC for ARVD/C irrespective of family history).
Severity and extent of structural abnormalities were
determined through review of echocardiography, cardiac
magnetic resonance imaging, and right ventricular angiography reports. Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation was
considered if rated as at least moderately severe on echocardiography reports. Enlargement of the right and left atria
Table 1
Outcome measures
The primary outcome was presence of atrial arrhythmias,
ascertained from medical records, including records of ICD
interrogations. Atrial arrhythmias were dened as a narrow
complex tachycardias with at least one episode lasting Z30
seconds. Where available, traces were examined and adjudicated in addition to reports from the treating physician.
Atrial arrhythmias appearing only during electrophysiologic
studies were excluded. Type of arrhythmia, symptoms, and
detection method were recorded. Atrial arrhythmias were
categorized into three groups: atrial brillation (AF), atrial
utter, and all other supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs).
Secondary outcomes were the development of stage C heart
failure, a sustained ventricular arrhythmic event, ICD placement, and death. Stage C heart failure is dened as patients
with current or past symptoms of heart failure (e.g., dyspnea,
fatigue) associated with underlying structural heart disease.19
A sustained arrhythmic event is a composite measure of the
occurrence of sudden cardiac death, spontaneous sustained
VT/VF, or an appropriate ICD intervention for a sustained
ventricular arrhythmia.9 Echocardiographic reports were
reviewed for moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation, mitral
regurgitation, and right and left atrial diameters.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as mean SD or median
(interquartile Range [IQR]) and compared across groups
using the independent Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test,
respectively. Categorical variables are reported as frequency
(percentage) and compared between groups using the 2 or
Fisher exact test. The cumulative probability of survival free
of an atrial arrhythmia was determined by the Kaplan-Meier
method, and differences in survival between groups was
evaluated with the log-rank test. Binary logistical regression
was used to control for age at last follow-up and sex. P o.05
was considered signicant. SPSS (version 19, IBM,
Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analysis.
Results
Study population
Baseline demographic data of the 248 patients enrolled in
this study are listed in Table 1. Mean age at last follow-up
was 41.6 14.0 years, 131 patients (52.8%) were male, and
Clinical value
P value
Male
Age at last follow-up (years)
Age at ARVD/C diagnosis
Length of ARVD/C follow-up
Desmosomal mutation carrier
131 (52.8%)
41.6 14.0
33.8 13.4
5.78 (IQR 8.52)
136 (54.8)
24 (68.6%)
49.7 14.6
39.4 15.7
6.15 (IQR 12.3)
14 (40.0)
107 (50.2%)
40.3 13.5
32.9 12.8
5.56 (IQR 8.11)
122 (57.3)
.044
o.001
.007
.047
.057
Values are given as n (%), mean SD, or median (interquartile range [IQR]).
ARVD/C arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.
Camm et al
1663
136 (54.8%) had known ARVD/C-associated genetic mutations (77.9% PKP2). (See Online Supplement Table 1 for
additional clinical features).
embolism (1), and deep vein thrombosis (1). All but one of
these patients is currently anticoagulated.
1664
Table 2
Clinical value
Age at rst atrial arrhythmia (years)
Years from ARVD/C presentation
Proportion male
Desmosomal mutation carrier
Taking antiarrhythmic drug at sentinel
atrial arrhythmia
Implantable cardioverter-debrillator
at last follow-up
AF (n 28)
Atrial utter
(n 11)
Other supraventricular
tachycardia (n 8)
P value
43.0 14.0
4.63 9.06
31 (66.0)
17 (36.2)
32 (68.1)
45.90 13.37
4.54 10.75
19 (67.9)
12 (42.9)
17 (60.7)
37.45 16.36
3.68 5.70
7 (63.6)
3 (27.3)
8 (72.7)
40.51 11.33
6.27 6.52
5 (62.5)
2 (25.0)
7 (87.5)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
41 (87.2)
25 (89.2)
9 (81.8)
7 (87.5)
NS
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the development of atrial arrhythmias. Left panel: Development of atrial arrhythmias based on age in years. Right
panel: Development of atrial arrhythmias based on length of follow-up. Four subjects were diagnosed on autopsy (time 0) and thus do not appear in the
numbers at risk. ARVD/C arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.
Camm et al
Table 3
1665
Clinical value
P value
Tricuspid regurgitation
Mitral regurgitation
Right atrial enlargement
Left atrial enlargement
34 (16.2)
9 (4.3)
67 (31.9)
31 (14.8)
10 (29.4)
2 (5.9)
18 (52.9)
13 (38.2)
24 (13.6)
7 (4.0)
49 (27.8)
18 (10.2)
.022
.64
.008
o.001
Discussion
Main ndings
The results of this study reveal that atrial arrhythmias are not
uncommon in patients with ARVD/C, occurring in 14% of
patients. ARVD/C patients who develop atrial arrhythmias
are, on average, older and more likely to be male. The
development of atrial arrhythmias was associated with
structural changes including left and right atrial enlargement.
regurgitation was signicantly associated with the development of atrial arrhythmias; in contrast, association with right
atrial enlargement was not signicant.
Overall prevalence
The rst important nding of this study is the prevalence of
atrial arrhythmias (AF, atrial utter, and other SVTs) in
patients with ARVD/C was 14%. This rate is similar to the
14.9% reported by Brembilla-Perrot et al.13 The lower
prevalence in this study compared with the 42% reported
by Chu et al12 and the 25% reported by Tonet et al14 may be
related to population selection. In these prior studies, patients
were limited to those undergoing ventricular ablation therapy
and those presenting with ventricular arrhythmias, respectively, both markers of more severe disease. Given the high
proportion of paroxysmal AF in our current study (27/28
[96%]), the low rate of atrial arrhythmias (4.1%) demonstrated by Jaoude et al22 likely reects the lack of comprehensive assessment of patient records examining for atrial
arrhythmias, which were instead identied solely through
ECG assessment.
Clinical value
Overall population
(n 248)
Atrial arrhythmias
(n 35)
No atrial arrhythmias
(n 213)
P value
Dead
10 (4.0)
4 (11.4)
6 (2.8)
.038
ICD
239 (92.3)
32 (91.4)
197 (92.5)
.738
Sustained arrhythmic event
164 (66.1)
25 (71.4)
139 (65.3)
.565
Premature ventricular complex count (n 179) 2430 (IQR 4620) 2530 (IQR 4820) (n 21) 2380 (IQR 4650) (n 157)
.790
Heart failure
32 (12.9)
12 (34.3)
20 (9.4)
o.001
Antiarrhythmic therapy at last follow-up
117 (47.2%)
29 (82.9%)
88 (41.3%)
o.001
Values are given as n (%), n/N (%), or median (interquartile range [IQR]).
A sustained arrhythmic event is a composite measure of the occurrence of sudden cardiac death, spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular
brillation, or an appropriate implantable cardioverter-debrillator (ICD) intervention for a sustained ventricular arrhythmia.
1666
Disease severity
It has been previously suggested that atrial arrhythmias may
be associated with the presence or development of more
severe disease.12,14 In this study, the presence of atrial
arrhythmias showed a variable association with factors
Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology behind the development of atrial
arrhythmias in ARVD/C is far from clear. Atrial enlargement
is a known risk factor for atrial arrhythmias, especially AF.27
Several groups have previously suggested a role for the right
atrial dilation often seen in ARVD/C in the development of
atrial arrhythmias.12,14 The limited availability of cardiac
magnetic resonance imaging data within this population
makes structural analysis of the atria difcult. However, we
demonstrated a correlation between atrial arrhythmias and
tricuspid regurgitation using echocardiographic imagining,
in support of previous studies.12 However, this nding
cannot fully explain the prevalence of atrial arrhythmias
within the ARVD/C population. Although a correlation with
both left and right atrial enlargement and atrial arrhythmias
was also identied, the known limitations of echocardiography when viewing the atria limit the validity of these
results. Left atrial enlargement is a known effect of AF,28
which suggests that the structural changes seen both in this
study and by previous groups may be a result of the atrial
arrhythmias rather than a causative factor.
Desmosome mutations and the resulting dysfunction are
known to be a major pathologic mechanism in ARVD/C.
Desmosomes are found throughout the cardiac system,
including the atria. Evidence for a pathologic role of the
atria in ARVD/C remains limited; however, support for a
desmosomal basis to atrial arrhythmias in this population is
multifactorial. A small autopsy case series (two patients with
ARVD/C) by Morimoto et al29 showed the presence of fatty
tissue within the sinoatrial node of both patients. Direct atrial
involvement with ARVD/C is further suggested by the
nding of atrial involvement in 17% of cats in an ARVD/
C model.30 Additionally, the postnatal loss of desmoplakin
within the cardiac conduction system has been shown to lead
to sinoatrial node dysfunction in mice.31 Furthermore, work
by Platonov et al32 has demonstrated evidence for altered
electrical conduction within the atria of ARVD/C patients.
Despite this suggestive evidence, data directly relating to
atrial involvement in patients with ARVD/C are lacking. The
thin-walled nature of the atria makes biopsy unwise.
Furthermore, despite cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Camm et al
Clinical implications
An atrial arrhythmia prevalence of 14% in this ARVD/C
population highlights the need for vigilance among treating
clinicians. This is further supported by the increased mortality and heart failure prevalence associated with these
patients. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that atrial
arrhythmias are a common cause of inappropriate shocks in
patients with ARVD/C. This nding has important implications for programming of ICDs to minimize the risk of
inappropriate shocks should an atrial arrhythmia occur. The
association with male gender and increasing age suggests
that these factors should guide clinicians when considering
evaluation of ARVD/C patients for atrial arrhythmias.
However, the lack of additional association with length of
follow-up suggests that clinical vigilance should not depend
on this factor.
Study limitations
This study has a number of limitations. First, data were
obtained retrospectively as part of a large registry; as such,
there is likely to be variability in the completeness of data
records and the standard of evaluation each patient received
both in regard to their ARVD/C as a whole and any atrial
arrhythmias in particular. Although this does provide some
limitations to the data, it also highlights a situation similar to
that encountered by many practicing physicians who may
lack complete data regarding a patient. Second, the use of
echocardiographic report data to rate valvular regurgitation
and atrial size is a potential limitation because echocardiograms are notorious for poor imaging of the right atrium, and
the quality of the data contained within reports is likely to be
affected by examiner experience. This limitation may be
compounded by the lack of corroborating imaging. Additionally, length of time between echocardiogram and last
follow-up or sentinel atrial arrhythmia was variable. This
may have resulted in some related factors being missed.
Conclusion
The results of this study demonstrate that atrial arrhythmias
are common in patients with ARVD/C and, when seen, occur
at a signicantly younger age when compared to the general
population. Other associated factors include male gender,
presence of heart failure, and right atrial enlargement. We
suggest that clinicians caring for patients with ARVD/C
should consider the presence of atrial arrhythmias in such
patients, particularly bearing in mind the above associations.
1667
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the ARVD/C patients and their families
who made this work possible.
Appendix
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.
2013.08.032.
References
1. Basso C, Corrado D, Marcus FI, Nava A, Thiene G. Arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy. Lancet 2009;373:12891300.
2. Marcus FI, Fontaine GH, Guiraudon G, et al. Right ventricular dysplasia: a report
of 24 adult cases. Circulation 1982;65:384398.
3. Thiene G, Nava A, Corrado D, Rossi L, Pennelli N. Right ventricular cardiomyopathy
and sudden death in young people. N Engl J Med 1988;318:129133.
4. Dalal D, Nasir K, Bomma C, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: a
United States experience. Circulation 2005;112:38233832.
5. Hulot J-S, Jouven X, Empana J-P, Frank R, Fontaine G. Natural history and risk
stratication of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.
Circulation 2004;110:18791884.
6. McKoy G, Protonotarios N, Crosby A, et al. Identication of a deletion in plakoglobin
in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy with palmoplantar keratoderma
and woolly hair (Naxos disease). Lancet 2000;355:21192124.
7. Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, McKenna WJ. Role of genetic analysis in the
management of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:18131821.
8. Arbelo E, Josephson ME. Ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic
right ventricular dysplasia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21:473486.
9. Bhonsale A, James CA, Tichnell C, et al. Risk stratication in arrhythmogenic
right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy associated desmosomal mutation
carriers. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013;6:569578.
10. Bhonsale A, James CA, Tichnell C, et al. Incidence and predictors of implantable
cardioverter-debrillator therapy in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy undergoing implantable cardioverter-debrillator
implantation for primary prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:14851496.
11. Piccini JP, Dalal D, Roguin A, et al. Predictors of appropriate implantable
debrillator therapies in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.
Heart Rhythm 2005;2:11881194.
12. Chu AF, Zado E, Marchlinski FE. Atrial arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia and ventricular tachycardia.
Am J Cardiol 2010;106:720722.
13. Brembilla-Perrot B, Jacquemin L, Houplon P, et al. Increased atrial vulnerability
in arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease. Am Heart J 1998;135:748754.
14. Tonet JL, Castro-Miranda R, Iwa T, Poulain F, Frank R, Fontaine GH. Frequency
of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:1153.
15. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, DAgostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D.
Impact of atrial brillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study.
Circulation 1998;98:946952.
16. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial brillation as an independent risk factor
for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991;22:983988.
17. Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modication of the Task Force
Criteria. Eur Heart J 2010;31:806814.
18. Den Haan AD, Tan BY, Zikusoka MN, et al. Comprehensive desmosome
mutation analysis in North Americans with arrhythmogenic right ventricular
dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009;2:428435.
19. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation
and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: Executive SummaryA
Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the
Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): Developed in Collaboration With
the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; Endorsed by the
Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2001;104:29963007.
20. Lui CY, Marcus FI, Sobonya RE. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
masquerading as peripartum cardiomyopathy with atrial utter, advanced
atrioventricular block and embolic stroke. Cardiology 2002;97:4950.
1668
21. Morady F, Shen EN, Scheinman MM. Unusual features of arrhythmogenic right
ventricular dysplasia. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:639640.
22. Jaoude SA, Leclercq JF, Coumel P. Progressive ECG changes in arrhythmogenic right
ventricular disease. Evidence for an evolving disease. Eu Heart J 1996;17:17171722.
23. Alonso A, Agarwal SK, Soliman EZ, et al. Incidence of atrial brillation in whites
and African-Americans: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.
Am Heart J 2009;158:111117.
24. Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou PH, et al. Incidence and predictors of atrial utter in
the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:22422246.
25. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis,
and predisposing conditions for atrial brillation: population-based estimates.
Am J Cardiol 1998;82:2N9N.
26. Ackerman MJ, Priori SG, Willems S, et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus
statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm
Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Heart
Rhythm 2011;8:13081339.
27. McManus DD, Xanthakis V, Sullivan LM, et al. Longitudinal tracking of left
atrial diameter over the adult life course: clinical correlates in the community.
Circulation 2010;121:667674.