INVOLVING 3 BULLETS OR LESS 3 points of beneficiality from the side of the affirmative. 1. We are for the: Promotion of National Security and Crime Prevention 2. On Upholding the Tourism Industry of the Country 3. On the Protection of the Victims' Reputation
Why decriminalize? What do we want to avoid? Basically, the laglag-bala scam, and the extortion that comes along with it.
Promotion of National Security and Crime Prevention
In line with the police power of the state, we are one with the opposition when it comes to the regulation of firearms and ammunition through the current actions of the DOJ creating a task force, we are not neglecting such idea, but what is exclusive on our side is the stricter measure for extortion prevention. The law itself has loopholes that give the airport officials the chance to actually commit extortion. We say that current measures cannot address the problem and to pass a law amending the existing one is the only way to address that. HOW EXACTLY? Citing the case of THE UNITED STATES vs EGUIA and LOZANO, Extortion is committed by obtaining property from another without his consent, induced by wrongful use of fear. The fear of the passengers that they will be charged of a crime they did not actually commit to begin with, giving leeway to the officials to extort money from them as bail in order to be free from detention. Through decriminalization, no crime committed, no threats and extortion to happen.
November 13, 2015
Upholding the Tourism Industry of the Country
As Congressman Neri Colmenares put it, the tanim bala scam hampers our efforts to bolster tourism since NAIA is the gateway to the country, causes passengers to miss their flights and damages the reputation of our country in the international community. Our proposal aims to build a secure, orderly, and just nation for our tourists, foreign and local investors, and most importantly, our citizens.
Protection of the Victims' Reputation
In the case of Calalang vs. Williams, it is stated that "the welfare of the people is the supreme law." Detention, undeserved public humiliation, and unwarranted criminal record, are just few of the damages suffered by the victims of tanim-bala scam. As Senator Alan Peter Cayetano said in the senate probe last October 30, "This is an unacceptable conduct towards an OFW who has no police record and is fully aware of restrictions for air travel. Authorities should exercise zero tolerance over these harassment cases." As laid down in the case of MARITES vs COKIENG YAN, "Indeed, being tagged as an accused is by itself traumatic." What do we say?? We say that we are actually parallel with the purposes of criminal justice system, that to protect the innocent from an open and public accusation of a crime, from the trouble, expense and anxiety of a public trial for the crime he did not commit in the first place.