Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There is increasing interest in how evaluation can contribute to the evidence base on what works (and what doesnt) in
aid. ODE is uniquely placed to assess performance across the Australian aid program and bring international best
practice to bear in identifying new and better ways of working.
ODEs evaluations are guided by relevant professional standards including the Australasian Evaluation Society's
guidelines for the ethical conduct of evaluations [PDF 496kb], and the DAC quality standards for development evaluation
[PDF 1.8mb].
ODE conducts evaluations and reviews to assess the effectiveness of Australian aid to country programs and priority
sectors, identify areas of good practice and highlight important lessons.
This page houses completed and published ODE evaluations and reviews. Visit the Current work page for evaluations
currently in progress.
2014 Quality Review of Aid Program Performance Reports
A desk based review of donor experiences in Sector-wide approaches in the health sector
Evaluation of the Australia-Vietnam country strategy 201015
A window of opportunity: Australian aid and child undernutrition
Research for better aid: an evaluation of DFAT's investments
Working in decentralised service systems: challenges and choices for the Australian aid program
Smart Economics: Evaluation of Australian aid support for womens economic empowerment
Australias response to the Horn of Africa Humanitarian crisis, 2011 Evaluation Report
Two reviews of Australian aid operational evaluations
Evaluation of Australian aid to Timor-Leste
Evidence reviews
2013 Quality Review of Aid Program Performance Reports
Lessons from Australian Aid report (2013)
Australian Volunteers for International Development (AVID) Evaluation Report (2013)
Thinking and Working Politically: An evaluation of policy dialogue in AusAID (2013)
Building on Local Strengths: Evaluation of Australian law and justice assistance (2012)
Responding to Crisis: Evaluation of the Australian aid programs contribution to the national HIV response in
Papua New Guinea, 20062010
From Seed to Scale-Up: Lessons learned from Australias rural development assistance
Working Beyond Government: Evaluation of AusAIDs engagement with civil society in developing countries
A desk based review of donor experiences in Sector-wide approaches in the health sector report presents the findings
from a desk-based review of evidence on the effectiveness of donor support for the health sector through the use of
sector-wide approaches (SWAps), sector budget support and government systems in six countries where the Australian
aid program has used such approaches and/or systems (Bangladesh, Cambodia, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Samoa,
and Solomon Islands). The report is based on the findings of donors (including Australia) experience in supporting
sector-wide approaches in Asia and the Pacific. It does not evaluate the effectiveness of Australias broader interventions
in health system reform.
Read the review:
Sector wide approaches in the health sector: A desk-based review of donors experience in Asia and the Pacific (PDF
1.29mb)
Sector wide approaches in the health sector: A desk-based review of donors experience in Asia and the Pacific (Word
387kb)
Working in decentralised service systems: Short report on implications for aid managers
This is the ODE summary of the findings and recommendations of the evaluation Working in decentralised service
systems: challenges and choices for the Australian aid program (Office of Development Effectiveness, 2015). The short
report synthesises advice for program managers from the full evaluation report, drawing on Australias experience with
decentralised delivery of health, education and infrastructure (water, sanitation and roads) in Bangladesh, Indonesia,
Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Solomon Islands and Vietnam. Three priorities are suggested for improving future
approaches: i) work to improve service systems rather than deliver services where this is feasible; ii) choose
implementation partners carefully, and consider unintended effects; iii) work towards consistent and coordinated
investments, policies and systems.
Working in decentralised service systems: Short report on implications for aid managers (PDF 193kb)
Working in decentralised service systems: Short report on implications for aid managers (Word 198kb)
All significant Australian aid initiatives require independent evaluation at least once, under current DFAT policy. These
independent operational evaluations are commissioned and managed by DFAT areas with aid management
responsibilities. They are an essential part of Australias aid performance management and reporting system. The 87
operational evaluations completed in 2012 are the subject of these two ODE publications.
Quality of Australian aid operational evaluations assesses the quality of the evaluations, and considers underlying
factors influencing evaluation quality and utility.
The review confirms that the majority of operational evaluations (74 per cent) are credible, and provide robust evidence
about the performance of the Australian aid program.
The review identifies several areas for further improvement. It provides practical guidance for the DFAT areas that
commission operational evaluations, as well as specific recommendations to improve evaluation quality and utility.
The reviewed operational evaluations that have been published can be accessed via ODEs operational evaluations
page.
Read the summary brief:
ODE Brief: Quality of Australian aid operational evaluations (PDF 1mb)
ODE Brief: Quality of Australian aid operational evaluations (Word 841kb)
Read the full report and management response:
Quality of Australian aid operational evaluations (PDF 1.63mb)
Quality of Australian aid operational evaluations (Word 568kb)
Learning from Australian aid operational evaluations synthesises the findings of the 64 evaluations assessed as
credible and offering lessons of potential value to a wider audience.
This review addresses an identified gap in the dissemination of Australian aid evaluation findings since many of the
original evaluation reports can be hard to locate or readily digest. The reviews purpose is to inform and improve program
design and management within the Australian aid program, and to provide lessons of value to the broader development
community.
The report identifies nine key lessons for improving the effectiveness of the Australian aid program.
Read the full report:
Learning from Australian aid operational evaluations (PDF 1.27mb)
Learning from Australian aid operational evaluations (Word 468kb)
An evidence review was commissioned to gather and assess evidence and inform recommendations about appropriate
research methods for an evaluation of Australian aid for teacher development.
The review focuses on:
the meaning of teacher quality and its relationship to student outcomes
factors that influence teacher quality
international influence and engagement with teacher quality.
Teacher quality evidence review (PDF 1.01mb)
Teacher quality evidence review (Word 1.41mb)
Child nutrition
Addressing child nutrition: Evidence review (2014)
ODE has commissioned a review of the current evidence-based approaches to addressing child under-nutrition and how
they may apply to the Australian aid program. The review focuses on:
interventions to address child under-nutrition
contemporary policy thinking and approaches to nutrition
child nutrition data.
Addressing child nutrition: Evidence review (PDF 2.07mb)
Addressing child nutrition: Evidence review (Word 1.47mb)
Civil society in developing countries can be a powerful agent for change, and is an important development partner in
addition to partner governments and the private sector. ODE has conducted an evaluation of AusAID's engagement with
civil society, assessing how well AusAID is helping civil society in developing countries contribute to the development of
effective states.
Working Beyond Government: Evaluation of AusAIDs engagement with civil society in developing countries
recommends that Australia build on current strategic approaches for engaging with civil society, work with local systems
and partners, and apply good practice in the design of individual programs. The evaluation also found that choosing
appropriate intermediaries can help donors enhance sustainability, manage risk, reduce high transaction costs and take
small activities to scale.
Read the Working Beyond Government evaluation