Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1515/ijeeps-2013-0072
Research Article
Javier de la Cruz, Juan M. Ramirez*, and Luis Leyva
permanent
magnet
1 Introduction
The harmonic components are produced by distortions of
the magnetic field and the induced electromotive force in the
stator winding. This phenomenon reduces the rotating
machines efficiency and generates heat in the stator core,
noise and distortions in the output voltage waveform. Thus,
VTHD must be kept at the minimum possible value [1].
THD is usually used as a quality index to quantify the
distortion of a waveform [2], which is defined by the
IEEE-519 standard [3] to quantify the signals energy contained in all other signal components different from the
fundamental frequency.
The standard defines the way THD shall be computed,
q
PH
2
V
h2 h
THD
1
V1
where h is the index numbering the different harmonic
components contained in the signal under study. This article
460
previous experience on a 400 W synchronous machine indicates that the strategy becomes promising (Figure 2) [9].
Figure 1 shows simulation and actual results on the prototype. The maximum error between actual and simulated
results is around 4%.
In this article, a methodology for designing outer rotor
electric generators suitable for small wind turbines is proposed. Particularly, the main aim is the study of the VTHD
with respect to changes in the stators geometry (slot bottom diameter, yoke length, slot depth, teeth width and
outer opening of the slot) and the rotors geometry (polar
arc percentage, pole length and skew angle). The study
uses four different silicon steel foils for the stator construction. In total, 76 simulations are carried out in this study.
l
d
y
M agnets
2 Machine specifications
Using conventional methods, an outer rotor generator
for a wind turbine application is designed [10]. In this
case, the VTHD becomes 6.01%, which is out of specifications [2]. The parameters of this machine are summarized
in Table 1.
Table 1
Generator characteristics.
Nominal power
Poles
Stator slots
Phases
Cogging torque
5 kW
30
72
3
0.03 Nm
Rated speed
Structural elements
Material magnet
Core
VTHD
350 rpm
Steel SCM35
Neodymium N35
Silicon steel, M19
6.01%
3 Methodology
The analysis starts by estimating the induced voltage in the
winding terminals of the generator. With this purpose the
Finite Element Analysis program from JMAG is used. The
induced voltage signal is then passed through a MatLab
FFT routine for obtaining all the frequency components
contained in the voltage signal. By these information and
from eq. (1) the VTHD is estimated (Figure 5).
The voltage induced per phase in winding of
machine can be calculated through the expression [10],
E
nt cp Cw S
60 108
2
Tcog
Design parameters
Modify design
Frequency components
calculation
VTHD calculation
Yes
No
END
Figure 5 VTHD calculation flowchart.
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
3
Induced voltage
estimation
Changes?
2p
X
1 dR
2t
2
d
1
461
5.98
5.98
5.98
7.00
5.00
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
26.6
26.6
26.6
26.6
26.6
29.9
23.9
26.6
26.6
26.6
26.6
26.6
26.6
28.4
26.6
26.6
26.6
26.6
26.6
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.85
2.00
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
4.0
3.6
4.4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
12.7
9.5
6.3
3.2
p (%)
Core
55
55
55
55
55
50
60
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
24
30
27
27
27
27
27
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
6
0
0
0
462
3
2.5
2.2
M14
M19
M27
M43
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
3
4
5
6
7
Magnetic field intensity (H)
9
x 105
2.1
Magnetic flux density (B)
3.5
Saturation M14
1.9
1.8
M14
M19
M2
M4
1.7
1.6
1.5
0.12
VTHD (%)
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
7
x 104
M14
M19
M27
M43
0.1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Case of study
Figure 7 VTHD for all case studies.
463
130
Case 1
Case 17
Case 18
Case 19
Voltage
90
50
12
Normalized amplitude (%)
10
Case 7 - M14
8
6
4
2
0
10
30
11
13
15
17
19
17
19
Harmonic order
(a)
70
10
0.004
0.008
0.01
0.016
T ime (s)
Figure 9 Output voltage waveforms for case 1 and cases 1719 by
reducing the pole length (steel M14).
110
0.8
Case 18 - M14
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1
11
13
15
Harmonic order
(b)
Figure 11 (a) Harmonics of voltage with steel type M14, Case 7; (b)
Harmonics of voltage with steel type M14, Case 2.
0.04
Figure 10 Voltage waveforms for cases using steel M14.
Torque (Nm)
0.02
0.02
0.04
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
Electrical degrees ()
Figure 12 Torque: Case 18 with steel M14.
280
320
360
464
0.04
Torque (Nm)
0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Electrical degrees ()
Figure 13 Torque: Case 7 with steel M14.
0.015
Case 18
Case 7
Torque (Nm)
0.012
0.009
0.006
0.003
0
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 14 Harmonic components of torque with steel M14.
Nomenclature
The following nomenclature will be used throughout this
article:
Pole length
Air gap
Yoke length
Slot depth
Teeth width
Vn
FEA
Material permeability
Signal samples
Magnetic flux
Harmonic component
FFT
cp
Cw
Winding constant
CAD
Computer-aided design
465
References
1. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA Standards
Publication ANSI/NEMA MG 1-2003, December 17, 2003.
2. Bollen MH, Gu I. Signal processing of power quality disturbances. IEEE Press Series on Power Engineering. John Wiley
and Sons, Inc. USA 2006.
3. American National Standard (ANSI). IEEE recommended practices and requirements for harmonic control in electrical power
systems. IEEE Std 5191992. USA: IEEE Press, 1993.
4. Wang T, Wang Q. Optimization design of a permanent magnet
synchronous generator for a potential energy recovery system.
IEEE Trans Energy Conversion 2012;27:856863.
5. Tudorache T, Trifu I. Permanent-magnet synchronous machine
cogging torque reduction using a hybrid model. IEEE Trans
Magn 2012;48:26272632.
6. Sekerk P, Hrabovcov V, Pyrhnen J, Kalamen L, Rafajdus P,
Onufer M. Comparison of synchronous motors with different
permanent magnet and winding types. IEEE Trans Magn
2013;49:12561263.
7. Jiang M, Salmon J, Knight AM. Design of a permanent magnet
synchronous machine for a flywheel energy storage system
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.