Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOES BACTEREMIA INDUCED BY DENTAL PROCEDURES CAUSE CENTRAL LINE INFECTIONS? S Usmani,
L Choquette, R Bona, R Feinn, RV Lalla, University of
Connecticut, Farmington, CT
Objectives: To determine the contribution of bacteremia
induced by dental procedures to infections associated with central
venous catheters (CVCs) in patients with cancer.
Methods: Twenty-six cancer patients, with a CVC (port or
PICC line), received a dental cleaning (scaling and polishing),
without antibiotic prophylaxis. Periodontal status was assessed
prior to the procedure using the Periodontal Screening and
Recording (PSR) score. Blood samples for cultures were drawn
via the CVC before start of the procedure (baseline), 20 minutes
into the procedure, and 30 minutes and 24 hours after procedure.
Patients were followed for six months to detect evidence of
delayed infection.
Results: One subject with a positive blood culture at baseline was excluded from analyses. Baseline blood cultures were
negative in twenty-ve subjects. Nine of the twenty-ve subjects
(36%) had a positive blood culture 20 minutes into the procedure.
These nine subjects had a signicantly higher mean PSR score
(3.22) compared to the other sixteen subjects (2.56; p0.035). All
nine positive blood cultures were associated with at least one
microorganism typically found in the mouth. However, these
expected episodes of bacteremia did not persist, with no positive
blood cultures (0/25) at 30 minutes and 24 hours after procedure
ABSTRACTS
Abstracts e197
(p0.002 for comparison to 20 minutes into procedure). One
subject developed a port infection and bacteremia 4.5 months
after the procedure. This infection was associated with Staphylococcus aureus, which is found predominantly on the skin.
Furthermore, this subjects blood cultures during and after the
dental procedure were negative.
Conclusions: Patients with poor periodontal status are more
likely to experience a bacteremia following an invasive dental
procedure. Even in these patients, such occurrences of bacteremia
are transient in nature. These short-lived episodes of bacteremia
are highly unlikely to cause infections associated with CVCs in
patients with cancer. Therefore, routine antibiotic prophylaxis for
this reason is not warranted.
Funding Source(s): Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center at
the University of Connecticut Health Center
ORAL MEDICINE
e198 Abstracts
glucose control has become the standard of care. However, there
are scarce data on the appropriate glucose control during minor
dental surgery. Despite the paucity of studies investigating the risk
of postsurgical oral infections in persons with diabetes, recommendations to dentists include the use of prophylactic antibiotics
for patients with poorly controlled diabetes undergoing invasive
oral procedures. The aim of this study was to compare parameters,
such as immune proles, in patient with diabetes and in patients
without DM after dental extraction, as well as the impact of glucose
control.
Methods: The clinical trial included 44 subjects with diabetes (DM) and 14 controls (CG). All participants underwent
extractions of erupted teeth. Clinical assessments of healing were
performed on day 3, 7, 21, and 60 after surgery. Glycated
hemoglobin (A1c), neutrophil chemotaxis, oxidative burst,
neutrophil and monocytes phagocytosis were measured at the
time of the extraction.
Results: On day 60, all sockets were epithelialized, with no
signs of infection, and asymptomatic. At the time of extraction,
35(79%) individuals from the DM group presented with A1c>
6.5%, 14(32%) showed decreased chemotaxis, 4(9%) decreased
neutrophil phagocytosis, 6(14%) decreased monocyte phagocytosis and 12(27%) decreased oxidative burst. Seven individuals
with diabetes showed incomplete alveolar wound epithelialization
21 days after surgery, and among them 5 presented with
A1c>6.5% and 2 with A1c6.5%, 2 presented with decreased
neutrophil chemotaxis, 1 with decreased monocyte phagocytosis,
and 1 presented with decreased neutrophil phagocytosis and
oxidative burst. No one from the CG showed any delay in healing. There was no signicant difference between the groups with
respect to socket epithelialization (p0.1783).
Conclusions: This preliminary study showed normal healing of a postextraction alveolar socket at 60 days, despite the poor
glucose control and impaired neutrophil functions among patients
with diabetes.
Funding Source(s): FAPESP 2009/10934-5
OOOO
September 2013
be associated with lower LDL-C. Additional studies are needed to
further dene the efcacy of the once-daily iodine oral rinse and
evaluate its effect on biological markers of inammation.
Funding Source(s): NIH/NHLBI R44HL101821-01
NON-EXPOSED BISPHOSPHONATE-INDUCED OSTEONECROSIS OF THE JAWS. CHARACTERICS & IMPLICATIONS FOR CLASSIFICATION M Schiodt, J Reibel,
P Oturai, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen,
Denmark
Objectives: Non-Exposed Bisphosphonate (BP)-induced
Osteonecrosis of the jaws ONJ (NE-ONJ) does not t into the
clinical denition of ONJ, which requires exposed bone for 8+
weeks (Ruggerio 2006). Purpose: To report characteristics of
NE-ONJ compared to (exposed) E-ONJ.
Methods: The cohort consists of 102 consecutive patients.
They were treated with BP for multiple myeloma (n21),
mammary gland cancer (n39), prostate cancer (n7), other
cancers (n2), or osteoporosis (n33). The criteria used for
diagnosing NE-ONJ were: 1. previous treatment with BP; 2. no
precious jaw radiation; 3. no exposed bone in the oral cavity; 4.
oral or extraoral stula, jaw pain, swelling, and/or sequestrum
formation on imaging and; 5. Necrotic bone tissue on
histopathology.
Results: Among 102 ONJ patients 14 were NE-ONJ and 88
E-ONJ. The age and gender distribution was similar in the two
groups. Mandible was affected in 66%, maxilla in 24%. Mean
pain VAS score was 3.1. The NE-ONJ and E-ONJ were similar in
all important clinical signs and symptoms, except bone exposure.
The histopathology showing necrotic bone was unexpected in
some cases. Treatment was conservative in 23% (+/-antibiotics)
of the E-ONJ, and 14% of NE-ONJ, and surgical in 77% and
86%, respectively. At nal examination, NE-ONJ and E-ONJ
were free of symptoms in 85%, and 79%, respectively.
Conclusions: NE-ONJ represents a signicant proportion
of ONJ cases, and should be identied and treated. The similar
medical history, clinical symptoms, signs, and response to treatment suggest that E-ONJ and NE-ONJ belong to the same
biologic disease condition. Therefore, it is recommended to
establish global consensus criteria which include NE-ONJ in the
group of ONJ.