Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Court's inquiry doesn't end with the finding of a permissible purpose. If a proper programmatic
purpose is found, the Court must determine that the checkpoint was conducted in a reasonable
manner. The checkpoint has to be judged on the basis of the individual circumstances. See Illinois v.
Lidster, 540 U.S. 419, 427, 124 S.Ct. 885, 890, 157 L.Ed.2d 843, 852(2004).
There's a three part test to determine the reasonableness of a checkpoint. See Brown v. Texas, 443
U.S. 47, 50, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640, 61 L.Ed.2d 357, 361(1979). The court must look to "(1) the gravity
of the public concerns served by the seizure, (2) the degree to which the seizure advances the public
interest, and (3) the severity of the interference with individual liberty." Lidster, 540 U.S. at 427,
124 S.Ct. at 890, 157 L.Ed.2d at 852 quoting Brown, 443 U.S. at 51, 99 S.Ct. At 2640, 61 L.Ed.2d at
362. The second element of a reasonable checkpoint requires the police narrowly tailor the
checkpoint to serve the primary programmatic purpose. See Lidster at 427. Without tailoring, "it is
possible a roadblock purportedly established to check licenses could be located and conducted in
such a way as to facilitate the detection of crimes unrelated to licensing." See LaFarve 10.8(a), at
347-48.