They gained the World

and Lost their Souls.

And they do not know the
Future
Mystery,
or
understand ancient matters.
And they do not what is
going to happen; and they
will not save their souls from
the future mystery.
.
Dead Sea Scrolls
Prophecy of the Assenes
Home
How To Use
This Site:
Weekly
Events

Senator Franklin of Georgia, proposed 3 Bills, all of which are already

Constitutionally protected Rights of the People. House Bill #7 is the "Right To Travel
Act"; House Bill #21 is the exclusive use of gold and silver in the payment of debts, of which,
the Constitution states that money is gold and silver; and lastly, House Bill #11, to repeal the
authority of the governor to issue mandatory vaccine orders, of which, it is one's Right of choice,
not to be forced to take vaccinations. .

.
Calendar
Events
What's New?
Open
Readings
Downloads
What To
Study?
Moors
ResponseAbility
The Forgotten
Scrolls

It is important to note that if the Right to Travel Act is not passed in Georgia, or in any
other State, this does not mean one does not have the Right To Travel. It is a Right, not an Act.
A right bestowed to you from the moment of birth a Birth Right. In fact it really is a mute
point, and we especially want people to recognize that if it is already a Right, and is
constitutionally secured, as Senator Franklin abides, then it appears Senator Franklin
is exposing that the States have been violating the Peoples substantive Rights. Keep in mind the
only reason Governments are in place is to secure the Rights of the People and for no other
reason. Senator Franklin may get guff from his constituents, but his mind and soul ought rest
well, that he is not participating in the corruption of his fiduciary duties as a Public Servant.
The Right to Travel; The Right to Mode of Conveyance; The Right to Locomotion
are all absolute rights, and the Police can not make void the exercise of rights. State
v. Armstead, 60 s. 778, 779, and 781:
.
The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere
privilege, but a common and fundamental right of which the public and Natural
Beings cannot be rightfully deprived. Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago 337
Illinois 200, 169 NE 22, ALR, Ligare v. Chicago 139 ILL. 46, 28 HE 934, Boone
v. Clark 214 SW 607, 25 AM jur (1st), Highways, sec. 163:

National
Identification
Card &
Proclamations CBS news in Georgia posted Senator Franklins' intent, and of course, on the live

news reporting they only showed comments from people who thought it was 'crazy'.

Proclamations
These were people who absolutely don't know what their rights are (which
By States

unfortunately are most, due to the dumb-down educational guidance, and lack of

Congressional civilized principles). Not one recognized their Right to Travel, or maybe CBS news
Records
simply didn't show the viewers who did speak up for their secured Rights. It matters
Public
Records True and
Divine
Writs Of
Freedom
Quo
Warranto /
Averment Of
Jurisdiction
Use Of "Pro
Se"

not because the 'cat is out of the bag', pandora's box is open, and has been for a
while, which is probably why Senator Franklin has proposed these Bills. After all, it
is the will of the people, as in "We The People", that have forced many to fess-up.
Governments are not in place to dictate to the People, the People dictate to the
governments. For those who may think that there is some new rule, statute or
ordinance, they would be wise to read Article VI of the Supreme Law of the
Landthe Constitution, wherein it clearly exclaims that if any state makes a rule,
ordinance, statute, etc., that violates the Rights secured in the Constitution, it simply
has no standing. Then one may be able to overstand why the following stare decisis case law,
which applies to all of the states, was established:
Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making
or legislation, which would abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436, 125:

Law
Definitions
Juris
Prudence
Mortgage
Myth
Moors
Heritage &
History
Classes
Canaanland
Moors
Moors Order
Of The
Roundtable
About Noble
Drew Ali
About C.M.
Bey
About The
Fez
About Taxes
Food For
Thought
HOLIDAY HOLY DAY
Drivers
License Fraud
Failure To
Identify?

For those who may be thinking that in fact there can be laws established by the
State, they must refer to the Constitution Article I, section 10(1), wherein States are
prohibited from making Treaty Agreements. This section of the Constitution also
covers the issue regarding gold and silver, wherein it states they cannot make anything
but gold and silver coin as tender in payment of debts. Any 'new' Laws are made in a collective
parliamentary manner, by Sovereigns of the land the Nationals, and who are they? Where are
they? Certainly they are not modern Europeans who came here as colonist, because this is not
their land, they are not sovereigns to it. Certainly the Nationals are not the public servants. Just
as certainly, they are not people who have been branded Indian (the first brand), as this is not
India. They are Moors (the original navigators of the seas and the entire planet), who are, and
whos descendants are, aboriginal and indigenous to the land, and who authorized the Supreme
Law of the Land, based on Divine / Supreme principles. They established government and
taught the modern Europeans, by bringing them into the Constitutional Fold of government and
established ancient divine principles of civilization for civilized people, which were embodied
in, and adopted as, the Constitution for the United States of America. Oath bound obligations
were, and are, taken to it, as the Supreme Law of this land. This being done, and still being done
for the purpose of creating a more perfect union, amongst other concerns (read the preamble).
All public servants, officials and governments are to follow said supreme law of the land, no
matter what 'state', which begins with a 'state of mind', they may establish. The law of the land,
is the law of the land.
.
The Federal constitution was to bring the states together to follow established guidelines.
That brings us full circle back to the Constitution and the obvious violations being made by
those who took an Oath and who have a fiduciary duty to uphold it. Who, and where are the law
enforcers? - the Bailiffs, the Beys.
.
All encompassing, as Rights go, is the Right to be left alone, providing you do not violate
anyone else's Right to the same, then you would have made either a civil or a criminal
infraction. With continued focus and study, the people might obtain a quiet and peaceable
mental revolution as they begin standing up for their Rights, by first knowing them, and then
exercising them. You do not practice a Right, you exercise it, and you do not ask permission to
exercise it, as it has already been granted by your mere existence.
Under The United States Republics Constitutional system of Government and upon
the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control
ones conduct to others, leaving one the sole judge as to all that affects oneself.
Mugler v. Kansas 123 US 623, 659 60:

Prisoners In
Your Own
Land

You may be thinking, after reading the above stare decisis case law, that many of the
people, act ignorantly, are ill-educated and uncivilized, as if they have no civilized or civilian
training. This indicates a sad state of affairs when taking into consideration that a civilian is one
who is in astute in the law.

Aboriginally
Healthy

Civilian. Private citizen, as distinguished from such as belong to the armed services,
or (in England) the church. One who is skilled or versed in the civil law.

Sistars
Standing On
Law

What ought come to your mind next, is the fact that the masses have in fact been mis-taught,
and it is high time, we begin to implement institutions of thought that teach the people the truth
about heritage, history and birthrights, their substantive, unalienable rights of birth! The reason
governments are established in the first place are to secure those rights. Those are the principles
of civilization (ancient as they are) that sustain life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all.

Return Of
The
Matriarch
Religious
Controversy
Astrology
Cosmology
Prose, Poetry
& Literary
Scripts
Frequently
Asked
Questions
Product

US Supreme Court in US vs. Minker, 350 US 179 at page 187: "Because of what
appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their
respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
rights, due to ignorance."

For those who are not certain as to how to begin, you may want to recognize that
the 14th and 15th amendment are firstly, not ratified, and are therefore unconstitutional. As
well, they are amendments that brought the brand of negroe, colored and blacks into the status of
a corporate person with a strategic implementation that eludes to slavery, starting with the birth
certificate, the registration point of the chattel. The birth certificate implies the exchange of
finance, and is a negotiable bond, placed upon each individual, this is bureaucratic slavery. A
certificate absolutely implies finance. Slavery is prohibited upon the penalty of death, according
to the constitution, Amendment 13. This is why it is imperative that you declare you are a
natural person, as opposed to a corporate person who may be found to have no Rights to be

Details Paypal
Orders
Orders via
Money
Orders
Shipping
Policies

denied. As well, you must declare your Nationality, as there is only one race the human race,
comprised of many Nationalities. Natural people have natural rights of birth. Corporate people
do not, as they have privileges as chattel property. You will note many of the case laws utilize
the expression of natural person when expressing the rights secured in the constitution.

The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not

alter.
That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905).

Contact Us
The PDF below was posted by CBS of Georgia on January 31, 2011, regarding Senator
Franklins proposed Bills #7, 11, and 21.
There are other Letters such as the Letter from Samuel E. Rohrer, State Representative of the
Commonwealth, Harrisburg Pennsylvania, written to a Judge regarding Substantive Rights, in
2006; and, Arizona State Senator, Wayne Stump, who in 1985 recognized the organic national
constitution and indicated the drivers instrument as a contract that can be rescinded. Both have
already been posted on this site, and are being posted again here in PDF format.
.
Horizontal Divider 12
CBS Posting of Senator Franklin's House Bills
Letter To Judge from State Representative Rohrer
Letter from Wayne Stump, Arizona DMV to Law Enforcement
Click Here For PDF of this Article inclusive of CBS Postings
Horizontal Divider 12
Horizontal Divider 12
Back To Top Of Page
Back To What's New
Back To Home Page
Home How To Use This Site: Weekly Events Calendar Events
What's New? Open Readings Downloads What To Study?
Moors Response-Ability The Forgotten Scrolls
National Identification Card & Proclamations Proclamations By States
Congressional Records Public Records - True and Divine
Writs Of Freedom Quo Warranto / Averment Of Jurisdiction
Use Of "Pro Se" Law Definitions Juris Prudence Mortgage Myth
Moors Heritage & History Classes Canaanland Moors
Moors Order Of The Roundtable About Noble Drew Ali About C.M. Bey
About The Fez About Taxes Food For Thought
HOLIDAY - HOLY DAY Drivers License Fraud Failure To Identify?
Prisoners In Your Own Land Aboriginally Healthy
Sistars Standing On Law Return Of The Matriarch Religious Controversy
Astrology Cosmology Prose, Poetry & Literary Scripts
Frequently Asked Questions Product Details - Paypal Orders
Orders via Money Orders Shipping Policies Contact Us

Thank you for your assistance in the great missionary

work of helping to uplift fallen humanity!