Professional Documents
Culture Documents
May 2014
2014 5
Preface
The work presented in this report is on-going and should be considered a work-in-progress.
Two approaches are being used to achieve Task 3.3 which required DragonSTAR to,
Assess the scientific state of the art in China and European in two specific topics of societal importance and study a
number of potential synergies. The status of cooperation will be studied as well as very specific challenges (under the
two areas) that need to be further addressed through joint research strategies.
The first approach uses two case studies in areas of societal importance (water security and urban agriculture) to
identify areas for potential Sino-European collaboration in the future. These topics were selected because there is
high-level interest in further collaboration (e.g. EU-China Joint Declaration on Urbanisation 2012 and the ongoing
China-EU Dialogue on Agriculture and Rural Development) or because funded examples of Sino-European research
collaboration exist (e.g. FP7 SPRING, EuropeAid EU-China River Basin Management Programme). Also, they are both
topics of global significance and limiting factors in Chinas economic and social development.
At this stage of the project, the approach used was to identify the main drivers of research in these areas in China,
the main funding agencies, the types of research currently funded and the areas which likely to be funded in the
future. Whilst most reviews of Chinese research focus on work which is published in the international literature, the
vast majority of research funded in China is not well represented in this forum. DragonSTAR has instead tried to
focus attention on the projects which have received funding and then searched for research outputs. Due to the
complexities of the Chinese funding systems, much of this information is highly fragmented, difficult to obtain and
presented in highly technical language which is often difficult to translate into English. It is also worth noting that the
information gathered for this report is that which has been considered suitable for public release. There will be
considerable information withheld from public scrutiny, particularly from international scrutiny, for reasons of
confidentiality and concerns about how the information will be used.
The second approach involves interviewing Chinese and European scientists who have first-hand experience of
conducting EU-China research for their recommendations on how best to develop links and deliver research with
China or Europe based researchers, the challenges they have faced, as well as their experience and views of the
more technical aspects of project management and coordination. The interviews for the pilot study have been
completed but are yet to be analysed so the results are not presented here. The full interview campaign will begin in
the summer of 2014. Researchers working in the two case study areas described above will be targeted
preferentially.
Both approaches will be combined to identify specific topics for future collaboration with guidelines on best practice
on how to support and deliver research in these areas from the view point of the researchers.
Index
Preface
Index
1.
1.1
1.2
2.
2.1
2.2
2.3
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4.
5.
Background ...............................................................................................................................................
Availability of Information .......................................................................................................................
Idiosyncrasies of the Chinese Funding System .........................................................................................
1.2.1 Guanxi () .......... .......................................................................................................................
1.2.2 Standing on the Shoulders of Giants ............................................................................................
1.2.3 Risk .................................................................................................................................................
1.2.4 Rivalries between Funders ......
1.2.5 Jiangke Fei () .....................................................................................................................
Water Security ..........................................................................................................................................
Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................
Chinese Water Policies .............................................................................................................................
2.2.1 12th Five Year Plan ................ ........................................................................................................
2.2.2 2011 No.1 Document on Accelerating Water Conservancy Reform and Development................
Funding Programmes ...............................................................................................................................
2.3.1 Chinese Funding Schemes ......................................................... ..................................................
2.3.1.1 Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (Water Programme)...
2.3.1.2 National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) ..............................................................
2.3.2 International collaboration ........
2.3.2.1 EU-China .......
2.3.2.2 China EU Member State Cooperation ........
Urban Agriculture .....................................................................................................................................
Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................
Chinese Food Security Policies .................................................................................................................
Urban Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................
Chinese Policies on Urban Agriculture ....................................................................................................
3.4.1 Chinese Government Incentives for Urban Agriculture ...............................................................
3.4.2 Chinese Public Research Funding Schemes .................................................................................
Urban Agriculture Research Foci in China ................................................................................................
3.5.1 Urban Agriculture Key Laboratories .............................................................................................
3.5.1.1 Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South) Ministry of Agriculture (KLUAS) ............................
3.5.2 NSFC-Funded Urban Agriculture Projects .................... ...............................................................
3.5.3 Chinese Urban Agriculture Experts ..............................................................................................
3.5.4 Case studies promoted by the 2014 No.1 Document ..................................................................
3.5.5 Commercial Investment in Urban Agriculture ..............................................................................
3.5.5.1 IEDA and Vertical Farming .............................................................................................................
3.5.6 RUAF and Chinese Demonstrator Cities ..........................................................................................
Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................
Reference ...................................................................................................................................................
.
ii
1
1
3
3
4
4
4
5
6
6
9
10
14
16
16
16
42
42
44
48
48
48
50
57
58
59
59
60
60
61
62
66
69
69
69
70
71
72
1.
Background
1.1
Availability of Information
Chinas investment in science and technology is advancing at a prodigious rate [1], yet there is a growing anxiety
amongst its political and scientific leaders that despite these investments the domestic innovation system is still
underperforming [2-4]. There have been several excellent recent reviews of the Chinese research system which
provide possible reasons for this limited impact and which identify several areas of the system which are in urgent
need of reform to address this issue [2, 4, 5]. Two of the main issues relate to the high level of fragmentation in the
funding system and its lack of transparency. These issues were also encountered in the preparation of this report
when trying to collect information on research being conducted in China and are worth describing as they impact
international understanding and knowledge of Chinese research and innovation and will affect any attempts to
identify research areas of mutual interest.
Researchers can apply for funding from several sources as most ministries and funding organisations have
overlapping research remits. For instance, projects to support one of the 16 national Major Science and Technology
Programmes (also called Mega-Engineering Projects) on Water Pollution Control may be eligible for funding from
the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP), the Ministry of Water Resources (MWR) and the Ministry of Science
and Technology (MoST) who all have overlapping responsibilities for research in this area. To complicate things
further, most ministries also operate a hierarchical funding structure with the same pattern of grants available at the
different levels (e.g. applications for Key Labs can be made at the municipal, provincial and national levels under
the general remit of MoST but administered by MoST bureaux operating at the different levels), often with no clear
lines of communication between the different ministries or between the different levels of a ministry1. Overlying this
structure are other funding organisations, such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), who
may also fund research of relevance to this programme. Identifying where to start looking for information on specific
research disciplines is in itself a difficult task.
Commercial Chinese companies are now also investing in research and development and there have been several
significant investments in universities and research institutions both domestically and internationally in recent years
[6, 7]. Sources of information on these types of research funding are particularly fragmented but do tend to be
advertised.
It has been widely reported that this complicated system with its lack of clear lines of communication between and within
ministries has led to an exploitation of the system with identical research proposals being submitted to, and funded by, multiple
agencies.
Information on the research funded by the different ministries and funding organisations, such as the NSFC, is not
published widely and is not usually available on their websites. The reasons for this are likely to be complex, but
include concerns about confidentiality and how the information will be used and interpreted, particularly by
foreigners. During the compilation of the case studies for this report, only limited information on funded projects
had been considered suitable for public release on the internet and none of it had been translated into English or
other languages thereby excluding this intelligence from the vast majority of international researchers who may also
be working in these areas.
The general lack of transparency in how research funding has been used has been widely reported in the Chinese
and international media as there have been several high profile investigations into the misappropriation of research
funds [8]. There are claims that only around 40% of Chinese research funding has actually been used for scientific
research.
International scientific databases such as Scopus and Web of Knowledge further exacerbate the problem of
identifying research conducted by specific Chinese researchers as their software does not recognise Chinese
characters. This forces Chinese researchers to translate their names into pinyin and/or adopt more Anglicised
versions of their names2 [9]. Estimates by the Chinese Ministry of Public Security suggest that more than 1.1 billion
people (approximately 85% of Chinas population) use only 129 surnames. This low diversity in names is reduced
further with pinyin, as the same pinyin name can be used to represent several different names in Chinese
characters3. This makes it extremely difficult to search for publications associated with a Chinese project using
standard international scientific tools even if one knows the name and institution of a projects PI which are the
types of information most likely to be released by funding agencies4. These databases are now assigning unique
identifier codes to researchers but these are not well used for the moment and there is still considerable confusion.
Pinyin uses the Latin alphabet to represent phonetic sounds in Chinese and is used in place of Chinese characters (e.g. is
translated into Ai Ling in pinyin. In this case, it is common to convert Ai Ling into Aileen or Eileen in English). The situation
can be complicated even further as some characters can have multiple spellings in pinyin (e.g. can be spelled as Le, or Yue
in pinyin and researchers may not be consistent in their use of pinyin name).
3
For instance, the pinyin name Wu can be used to represent five different Chinese names ( ), Yu may
represent five names (), Qiu may represent four names () and so on.
4
A Scopus search returned 3016 documents in 28 different fields of research when asked to find work published by a researcher
named Wang, Y. at Chongqing University. This is not unusual.
1.2
The idiosyncrasies of the Chinese funding system are also worth noting as there are significant cultural differences
between the EU and China systems (the observations made here are the personal observations of the authors and
do not reflect the views of their institution or funders). These primarily relate to:
1.2.1
Guanxi ()
The concept of guanxi in China cannot easily be explained in English, but essentially it relates to a special type of
mutualistic relationship in which individuals support and promote each other to other individuals or organisations,
forming a network which permeates through both the professional and personal aspects of their lives. Many guanxi
relationships are made during the training stages of a researchers life at school and university but they may also be
made later in life based on individuals have the same hometown or some other shared commons (including
extended families). Whilst the social status of individuals in a guanxi relationship may differ, it is expected that the
relationship will be balanced in terms of the reciprocal benefits each receives in the longer term.
The influence of guanxi on research in China cannot be underestimated, particularly at municipal and provincial
levels. From the personal experiences of the authors, and from anecdotal evidence of Chinese researcher colleagues,
significant amounts of research funding are allocated privately in this way. Without guanxi (whether an individuals
own or via one of their guanxi benefactors), it can be extremely difficult for a researcher to receive funding or even
be able to network and meet new collaborators within China. Both of these activities require that researchers are
introduced to funders and potential collaborators via guanxi relationships. In this area, social events are a
particularly important tool to help build and reinforce new links. Significant grant applications require months if not
years of preparation and relationships with the key contacts are usually first developed in a social arena.
From the perspective of funding agencies, guanxi is seen as a positive phenomenon as it means that funders can
support and work with researchers who have been personally recommended to them by trusted associates. Unlike in
Europe where individual researchers are assessed using more clinical measures requiring documented proof of their
credibility and an assessment by evaluators who may not know them, the Chinese system relies instead on a more
personal approach which many in China consider to be more efficient and reliable.
Whilst foreign researchers are not expected to understand the finer aspects of guanxi, they are usually expected to
understand the general concept if they intend to work in China, and will need to consider what they have to offer
potential guanxi contacts to balance any assistance or hospitality they may receive. It is considered extremely
disrespectful not to reciprocate if one has benefited from a guanxi relationship.
1.2.2
Applying for Chinese grants requires that the researcher is both humble and respectful towards senior Chinese
researchers in the field. Not only must the supporting text of a proposal be balanced between research conducted in
China and internationally, but the proposers must also cite and acknowledge the contribution made by those senior
scientists who are likely to be reviewing their applications (for this reason, the list of evaluators are supplied in this
report where possible). Proposals which fail to emphasise any one of these three aspects are unlikely to be properly
reviewed and are unlikely to succeed.
Also, promotion of an applicants own work in a proposal is not considered to be a demonstration of their
competence and credibility in an area, but is instead perceived as boastful and uncouth. Again, this will damage a
proposals chances of success.
1.2.3
Risk
Whilst some funding agencies such as the NSFC are reforming their approach to risk, most Chinese funders are highly
risk averse. Proposals must contain clear unambiguous descriptions of their intended outcomes supported by
detailed descriptions of how those outcomes will be achieved. The level of detail required in a Chinese application is
significantly higher than that demanded by EU grant applications. Researchers must be confident that the project
outcomes can delivered before work has even started as failure will affect the success of future grant applications
and hinder the careers of the researchers involved.
Funders also try to reduce risk by focussing most of their resources on the more experienced researchers. Eligibility
for most grants is determined by whether a researcher has a track history of successful grant management. For
instance, the NSFC will only accept applications for its International Cooperation Programme from NSFC grant
holders who have successfully delivered at least one smaller project. Although exceptions have been made for a few
very senior international researchers, most international researchers working in China will need to prove themselves
capable of delivering smaller Chinese grants before they will be eligible to apply for the larger grants even if they
have substantial international research experience.
1.2.4
Many Chinese ministries operated a hierarchical funding structure at national, provincial and municipal (city) levels
with the same pattern of funding supported at each level. For instance international cooperation grants may be
available from a single ministry at national, provincial and municipal levels and administered independently at each
level. It has been reported that this structure can lead to rivalries between funders at the different levels
(particularly provincial and municipal levels) and within levels (e.g. between different cities in a province or between
provinces). For instance, it is generally considered more difficult for researchers in the wealthy city of Ningbo to
4
obtain grants from the Zhejiang province-level funders than from their municipal-level funders. The general
perception for this is that Zhejiang-level funders would prefer to prioritise research in the provinces capital city of
Hangzhou which hosts Zhejiang University (one of the top five universities in China) or other less wealthy cities in the
province than send money to Ningbo whose municipal-level schemes can afford to support the research of its own
universities. Again, the issue of guanxi may also play a role here. National-level funding schemes are generally
considered to be the most fair (e.g. NSFC).
1.2.5
Jiangke Fei ()
Jiangke fei is a cash payment made to senior researchers to attend Chinese-organised workshops and conferences.
These honoraria are usually given to key note speakers but also any senior delegates who may attend (in addition to
their travel and subsistence costs). For some academics, this is an important supplement to their income as Chinese
universities pay relatively low salaries compared to other professional groups. Current rates are between 500
2000RMB a day for a senior researcher but can be in excess of 5000RMB for a distinguished guest speaker.
Jiangke fei are mentioned here as they are essential for hosting workshops in China and it is extremely difficult to
claim these types of expenses from international funding sources as there is no clear audit trail.
2.
Water Security
2.1
Introduction
Water is essential for life and may be considered a limiting factor in Chinas economic and social development. As a
country, China suffers from a severe shortage of water as a result of both its climate5 and demographics, but these
shortages are being further exacerbated by significant levels of water pollution in many parts of the country and the
long-term effects of a fragmented and ineffective water governance system. Chinas per capita availability of
renewable water is around 28% of the world average, but water consumption per unit of GDP is three times the
world average because of water intensive industrial structure, outdated technologies, low reuse rate and
wastefulness [10]. The Chinese Ministry of Water Resources has reported that two thirds of Chinas 669 cities are
suffering from water shortages, with 110 classified as severe [11].
In terms of demographics, much of Chinas population, agricultural land and industry is located towards the north,
whilst the majority of its water is located in the south and there are extreme disparities in the water resources
available per capita across the country (Figure 1 and Table 1). For instance, the Huang, Huai and Hai Rivers and their
catchment areas (see Figure 2 for their location) support 34% of Chinas population but contain only 7.5% of its
freshwater resources (Table 2). This area is also responsible for the delivery of 34% of the countrys food production
whose productivity is strongly affected by water availability so there are also important implications for the countrys
food security [12]. By contrast, the south of the country supports 53% of the total population but contains 80.9% of
the nations water (Table 2).
Water is used primarily for agricultural, industrial and for domestic purposes and demands for increased water
resources are increasing across all three areas (Table 3). The proportions of water used for these purposes are
changing too as a result of increased economic development, urbanisation and population size (Table 3). Agricultural
demands claim the highest proportion6, but overall demand from industry has doubled from 10% in 1983 to 23% in
2006 [11] and there is a growing demand from the increasing urban
5 The temporal dynamics of Chinas water resources are determined by precipitation and approximately 98% of Chinas surface waters are
recharged in this way [5].
6 Roughly, the production of one tonne of crop requires 1000 litres of water so there are major water resources issues if China demands
increased domestic food security.
Consequences
Disruptive water shortages can occur frequently
Severe water shortages can occur threatening food production and
economic development
Absolute water scarcity
Table 2. Spatial distribution of Chinas water resources and per capita availability [17]
Region
North (total)
Song-Liao
Hai-Luan
Huai
Yellow
Northwest
South (total)
Yangtze
Pearl
South Eastern
South Western
Total
Population,
Millions (%)
450.7 (16.6)
165.3 (6.1)
28.8 (1.1)
74.1 (2.7)
66.1 (2.4)
116.4 (4.3)
2260.8 (83.4)
951.3 (35.1)
468.5 (17.3)
255.7 (9.4)
585.3 (21.6)
2711.5 (100)
592.4 (45.2)
119.6 (9.1)
133.9 (10.2)
198.8 (15.2)
110.6 (8.4)
29.5 (2.3)
694.7 (53.0)
428.3 (32.7)
171.0 (13.0)
74.5 (5.7)
20.9 (1.6)
1311.1 (100)
255.1 (30.8)
62.5 (7.5)
26.5 (3.2)
39.3 (4.7)
40.6 (4.9)
86.2 (10.4)
591.7 (69.3)
246.4 (29.7)
111.6 (13.5)
61.3 (7.4)
154.4 (18.6)
828.8 (100)
535.8 (19.1)
192.8 (6.9)
42.1 (1.5)
96.1 (3.4)
74.4 (2.6)
130.4 (4.6)
2276.6 (80.9)
961.3 (34.2)
470.8 (16.7)
259.2 (9.2)
583.3 (20.8)
2812.4 (100)
Annual per
capita water
resources,
m3
904.1
1621.1
314.4
483.4
672.4
4417.2
3276.6
2244.7
2753.3
3481.3
28064.7
2145.1
Liao River ()
Hai River ()
Yellow River
(Huang He/ )
Huai River ()
Yangtze River
(Chiang Jiang/ )
Pearl River ()
Figure 2. The location of Chinas main rivers and main tributaries [18]
Year
1998
Beijing
2010
2020
1998
Tianjin
2010
2020
1998
Hebei
2010
2020
1998
Shandong
2010
2020
1998
Henan
2010
2020
2.2
Urban and
rural
1224.00
(30.24)
1509.66
(33.47)
1780.31
(36.35)
485.00
(22.53)
655.34
(27.07)
815.96
(30.54)
2173.00
(9.60)
3195.61
(14.05)
4176.02
(18.00)
2445.00
(11.96)
3760.14
(17.14)
5028.64
(20.83)
2789.00
(11.76)
4234.89
(16.35)
5618.07
(20.41)
Industry
Agriculture
1084.00
(26.79)
1366.93
(30.31)
1565.61
(31.97)
619.00
(28.75)
780.57
(32.24)
894.02
(33.79)
2700.00
(11.93)
3404.73
(20.46)
3899.59
(22.44)
4342.00
(15.83)
5475.30
(18.85)
6271.12
(19.78)
3693.00
(16.03)
4656.91
(19.20)
5333.77
(21.04)
1739.00
(42.97)
1633.64
(36.22)
1551.16
(31.68)
1049.00
(48.72)
985.44
(40.70)
935.69
(35.37)
17754.00
(78.46)
16678.32
(65.49)
15836.24
(59.56)
18656.00
(72.17)
17525.67
(64.01)
16640.81
(55.68)
16836.00
(72.21)
15815.94
(64.45)
15017.40
(58.55)
Total
water use
Increment
4047.00
4510.23
463.23
4897.08
850.08
2153.00
2421.35
268.35
2645.66
492.66
22627.00
23278.66
651.66
23911.85
1284.85
25443.00
26761.12
1318.12
27940.57
2497.57
23327.00
24707.75
1380.75
26969.24
2642.24
The management of water resources in China is a complex process governed by several ministries with overlapping
remits operating at different levels of government (Figure 3). Whilst it has long been recognised that China is facing
a water crisis, reform of its water resource management did not begin until the late 1990s following a period of
extreme water shortages which threatened food security [14, 17]. More recently there have been three policy
documents which have rapidly advanced the reform of water management: the 11 th Five Year Plan (2006 2010),
the 12th Five Year Plan (2011-2015) and the 2011 No.1 Document on Accelerating Water Conservancy Reform and
Development 2011-2020.
2.2.1
The 12th Five Year Plan continued the water reforms initiated in the 11th Five Year Plan (see Table 4 for examples of
projects funded) and demanded:
(1)
A 30% reduction in water intensity (water consumed per unit of value-added industrial output).
Unfortunately, this will still lead to an overall increase in water usage from 599 billion m3 in 2010 to 620
billion m3 by 2015 as China continues its economic development.
Investments in water management and infrastructure to improve irrigation for agriculture.
(2)
Pollution targets
A 10% reduction in ammonium nitrate and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) from 2007 levels. These
targets were set following the first national census of water pollution in 2010 when it was discovered that
more than 6 million sources of residential, industrial and agricultural pollution were missing from previous
measures of water contamination and that >40% of Chinas COD and >55% of its nitrogen discharges come
from agricultural sources. The impact of these target on food production and security is unclear.
A 15% reduction in heavy metal pollution (specifically lead, mercury, chromium, cadmium and arsenic) by
2015 from 2007 levels.
(3)
Infrastructure
Water quality
Water fee
The development of a water fee collection structure at central and local levels to implement the most
stringent water management system [16].
The demonstrator areas and projects identified for the 12th Five Year Plan include over 300 technology projects
focussed on improving water quality in several major river basins (namely three rivers7, three lakes8, a stream9, and
a reservoir10) [19]. These projects include:
Three rivers refer to River Huai (), River Hai () and River Liao ().
Three lakes refer to Lake Tai (), Lake Chao and Lake Dian .
10
10
The risk assessment and warning by remote sensing and monitoring of water environment (
);
11
Project
2008ZX07102
Where
What
Who
Lake Dianchi is one of the three lakes on Chinese central government' s agenda for
implementing immediate eutrophication and algal bloom control A six-step
methodology framework on long-term watershed management planning was
proposed in this paper to meet the decision making requirements on eutrophication
controlThe framework is based on lake carrying capacity and Total Maximum Daily
Load ( TMDL) and consists of components including eutrophication diagnosis
investigation and evaluationTMDL and carrying capacity calculationplanning
tasks designingadaptive managementand strategic solutions proposal An
integrated load reduction system was thereby designed to achieve water quality goals
in two planning periods and under four watershed-scale development
scenarios The strategic solutions were then proposed for eutrophication control in
Lake Dianchi
River
)2009ZX07106-004
The Conservation of Water Quality and
Quantity and Habitat Improvement
Technology for Typical Water Shortages in
the North (
)2009ZX07106003
The Water Quality Improvement Aquatic
Vegetation Construction Technology of
Typical Southern Urban Landscape (
) 2009ZX07106-002
The Integrated Technology of Overall
Treatment for Water Environment
2009ZX07212005
Xinjiang
Province
Dongchanghu
City
Research and development of wetland purifying water quality and Optimal Allocation
of Water Replenishment of Water Technology to support water environment
improvement in the North.
Hangzhou City
Zhenbin Wu () from
Institute of Hydrobiology, CAS (
)
Binghu Tian () from the
Research Center for EcoEnvironmental Science, CAS (
)
Special River
12
) 2009ZX07212-004
Monitoring
and Warning
Special River
)2009ZX07212-003Four Years
. Key words:
2009ZX07529-007
13
2.2.2
The 2011 No.1 Document on Accelerating Water Conservancy Reform and Development 2011-2020 is the single
most important piece of water-specific legislation in China. It was introduced to accelerate the reform of water
resource management and achieve sustainable use of water within the decade with a budget of 4000 trillion RMB
(500 billion) over ten years [10, 20]. This was double the previous budget [21]. A Three Red Lines structure was
used to set targets and operationalise the policy [20]. These were:
(1) The Red Line to limit total water use by demand management11, with a target of reducing the total
quantity of water consumed nationwide to below 700 billion m3 by 2030;
(2) The Red Line to achieve higher water use efficiency in industry and agriculture, with targets for attaining
or approaching world advanced levels of water use efficiency in these areas;
(3) The Red Line to improve water quality by reducing pollution loads within Water Functional Zones, with
targets controlling the total quantity of major pollutants discharged into rivers and lakes to within the
pollutant absorption capacity of the water function areas and raising water quality compliance rates in such
areas to higher than 95%.
In order to realise the Three Red Lines, additional shorter-term targets for water resource management were
specified for 2015 and 2020. The priorities for investment for the first phase (2010-2015) were identified as: water
resource security (35% of the investment), flood control and disaster relief (28%), irrigation and farmland
conservation (20%) and water and soil conservation (7%).
11
Demand-driven water resource management ignores the economic nature of water resources and can lead to escalations in
conflict between locally limited water availability and water demand 17.
Jiang, Y., China's water scarcity. Journal of
Environmental Management, 2009. 90(11): p. 3185-3196..
14
Figure 3. Overview of government hierarchy related to the management of water resources [22]
15
2.3
Funding Programmes
Research in the area of water security covers an extremely broad range of issues across multiple disciplines and may
be funded by both the public and private sectors.
2.3.1
In terms of the funding available from the State, all the government ministries presented in Figure 3, in addition to
the Ministry of Science and Technology, support research into on water security. Support is also available from the
more traditional funding bodies such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Chinese
Academy of Sciences (CAS) have their own funding schemes too (via CAS, the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE),
the Chinese Academy of Space Technology (CAST) and the Chinese Academy of Agriculture (CAAS)).
2.3.1.1 Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (Water Programme)
This section focusses on the funding programmes available through the 12th Five Year Plan Major Science and
Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control which is one of the 16 mega-engineering projects supported
by the Five Year Plan programme. Funding for this particular programme may be accessed through several ministries
including the Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Science and Technology. The funding
programme for the Ministry of Environmental Protection provided the most complete information on their work
programme in this area.
(1) Ministry of Science and Technology
The Water Pollution Control Programme was the largest investment for MoST in water pollution control since 1949
and is worth up to 30 billion RMB [23]. The focus of the MoST involvement is to address key and common
technological issues related to water pollution control and treatment which limit the
The Ministry of Environmental Protection categorised its funding economic and social development of China.
(2) Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP)
for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control under six themes which were lakes,
rivers, urban, drinking water, monitoring & warning and strategy & policy. These themes were further subcategorised according to specific geographic regions or water sheds.
In 2013, there were four rounds of calls under this programme which were published in May, assessed in June with
successfully funded projects starting in January 2014. Funding came from both central and local sources and was not
usually equally balanced. The list of calls and successful projects are listed in Tables 5, 7, 9 & 11 and Tables 6, 8, 10 &
12 respectively. There was no obvious underlying theme to each of the calls, although the first call had a strong
technology and industrialisation focus to its nine calls and were all supported by budgets over 17 million RMB (Table
5), the second call was dominated by demonstrator schemes (Table 7), the third call was formed of a mixture of 17
16
calls including a couple of relatively small policy schemes (worth 5 million RMB) (Table 9) and the fourth call was
composed of nine large demonstrator schemes (worth between 50 - 105 million RMB each) (Table 11).
MEP published two additional calls in June 2013 on Domestic Water Pollution Control (seven calls worth 20-180
million RMB each) (Table 13) and Securing Drinking Water Safety (ten calls worth 20-180 million RMB each) (Table
14).
The experts used to evaluate the proposals are listed in Tables 15 & 16. Experts are classified as generalists or
specialists under this scheme.
17
Table 5. First call for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (funded by the MEP)
Basin
Liao River
Stream
Songhua
Task Attribute
Programme Name
Technology
Demonstration
Technology
Demonstration
Huai River
Technology
Demonstration
Chao Lake
Technology
Demonstration
Three
Gorges
Reservoir
Technology
Demonstration
)
Technology and Project
Demonstration of Water
Pollution Control and Heavy
Metal Area Overall Treatment for
Chao Lake (
)
Technology and Project
Demonstration of Water
Pollution Overall Prevention and
Treatment for Three Gorges
Reservoir (
)
Expenditure
(Million RMB)
Central Local
17
17
17
Theme
Duration
Monitoring
and
Warning
01/201412/2016
River
01/201412/2016
01/201412/2016
20
30
River
20
30
Lake
20
20
Lake
18
Key River
Catchment
Industrialized
Key River
Catchment
Industrialized
Key River
Catchment
Industrialized
Industrialized
Key River
Catchment
30
60
River
30
60
River
30
60
River
30
60
Lake
19
Table 6. Projects funded under the first call for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (funded by the MEP)
Project
Project Name
No.
Implementing Unit
2014ZX The Key Technology Research and Demonstration of United Dispatch based on
071040 Three Gorges Reservoir and its Downstream Water Environment ( Wuhan University/
05
)
Guolu Yang/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
2014ZX The Key Technology Research and Demonstration of Water Quality- Water
072040 Quantity-Water Ecological United Dispatch for Huai River Catchment ( Wuhan University/
06
-- )
Jun Xia/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
2014ZX The Key Technology and Industrialized Demonstration of The Paper Industry
072130 Water Pollution Control in Key River Catchment (
01
)
Kexia Chen/
Industrialization
01
Catchment ()
(http://xmvisbe.jdol.com.cn/)
Industrialization
2014ZX The Demonstration of Water Environment Monitoring Instrument Research and Focused Photonics Inc. /
075070 Development, and Socialized Online -monitoring and Industrialized the Service
Huajun Ye/
01
()
(http://www.fpi-inc.com/)
2012ZX Water quality improvement and water ecological restoration in the Huai River
07204 Catchment
Nanjing University/
20
Aimin Li/
Deputy chief/
of specialists in
theme two
http://hjxy.nju.edu.cn
/liam/news/?107.html
Common/ Generic
Technology
Table 7. Second call for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (funded by the MEP)
Basin
Task Attribute
Programme Name
Liao River
(inflow)
Technology
Demonstration
Songhua River
(outflow)
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Hai River
(inflow)
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Hai River
(inflow)
Technology
Demonstration
Hai River
(inflow)
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Hai River
(inflow)
Technology
Demonstration
Hai River
(inflow)
Technology
Demonstration
Expenditure
(Million RMB)
Theme
Central
18
Local
5
25
40
River
30
60
River
28
45
River
25
40
River
18
Monitoring
and Warning
18
Monitoring
and Warning
21
Monitoring
and Warning
Huai River
(inflow)
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Huai River
(inflow)
Technology
Demonstration
Huai River
(inflow)
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Dong River
(outflow)
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Dong River
(outflow)
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Key catchment
Industrialization
Key catchment
Industrialization
25
50
River
24
24
River
25
50
River
25
40
River
25
40
River
25
50
Lake
10
20
River
22
Key catchment
Key catchment
Key catchment
10
20
River
10
20
River
10
20
River
10
20
River
Policy
Policy
Policy
23
Table 8. Projects funded under the second call for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (funded by the MEP)
Project No.
Project Name
Implementing Unit
Principal Investigator
Attribute
2014ZX07114001
(http://www.zchb.net/csd )
Kai Shao/
Industrialization
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Heilongjiang
Province/
2012ZX07203
2014ZX07203008
Peking University/
Baoqing Shan/Group
Leader/ of specialists in theme
two
(http://sourcedb.cas.cn/sourcedb_r
cees_cas/yw/fs/200906/t20090612
_1038283.html )
Xiaoliu Yang/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Hebei Province/
2014ZX07211001
Sound Group/
(http://www.soundgroup.com/)
Jingzhi Zhang/
Industrialization
2014ZX07204005
Aijie Wang/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Jiangsu
Province/
2014ZX07204008
Nanjing University/
Fuqiang Liu/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
2014ZX07201009
24
Local
organizational
joint trial unit
Zhencheng Xu/
2014ZX07206001
Yiliang He/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Guangdong
Province/
2014ZX07206005
Fantang Zeng/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Guangdong
Province/
EST/
(http://estpure.com/a/technology.aspx )
Xiaowei Sun/
EST/
(http://estpure.com/a/technology.aspx )
Xiaowei Sun/
Industrialization
(http://huanke.com.cn/08/index.asp )
XI'AN SHAANGU POWER CO.,LTD/
(http://www.shaangu.com/ENGLISH/inde
x.jsp?urltype=tree.TreeTempUrl&wbtreei
d=1070 )
ZHE JIANG HUANXING/
(http://www.zj-zhx.com/)
Yi Zhang/
Industrialization
Jingxin Liu/
Industrialization
Qilin Yu/
Industrialization
Chunlian Xu/
Common/
Generic
Technology
Zhiwei Xin/
Common/
Generic
Technology
2014ZX07214
2014ZX07214001
2014ZX07214002
2014ZX07214003
2014ZX07214004
2014ZX07504003
2014ZX07504005
25
26
Genyi Wu/
Policy
Management
Table 9. Third call for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (funded by the MEP)
Project No.
Basin
Task Attribute
Programme Name
2014ZX07101011
Tai Lake /
Taihu/
(freshwater)
Technology
Demonstration
2014ZX07508
Liao River
(inflow)/
Technology
Demonstration
2014ZX07503004
Songhua River
(outflow)/
Technology
Demonstration
2014ZX07105001
Erhai / Erhai
Lake
(freshwater
lake) /
Technology
Demonstration
2014ZX07509
Key
catchment/
Industrialization
2014ZX07602003
(freshwater)
Policy
2014ZX07603002
Policy
Expenditure
(Million RMB)
Theme
Central
20
Local
10
20
10
Monitoring
and Warning
29
15
Monitoring
and Warning
20
20
Lake
30
30
Monitoring
and Warning
Policy
Policy
27
Lake
Liao River
(inflow), three
gorges/
Policy
2014ZX07510
Key
catchment/
Integration
28
Policy
40
Special
Integration
Table 10. Projects funded under the third call for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (funded by the MEP)
Project No.
Project Name
Implementing Unit
Principal Investigator
2012ZX07101
2012ZX07105
Local
organizational
joint trial unit
catchment)/
Attribute
Jiangsu
Comprehensive
Province/
Demonstration
Yunnan
Comprehensive
Province/
Demonstration
/7032/ )
Common/
Generic
Technology (
)
Common/
Generic
Technology
29
Qiujin Xu/
2012ZX07503
Fengchang Wu/
Jixi Gao/
2013ZX07504
Kaijun Wang/
2012ZX07506
Haisuo Wu/
30
Common/
Generic
Technology
Table 11. Fourth call for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (funded by the MEP)
Basin
Task Attribute
Programme Name
Central
Local
(freshwater)
Technology
Demonstration
20
20
Monitoring and
Warning
Liao River
(inflow)/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
30
45
River
Songhua River
(outflow)/
Technology
Demonstration
20
30
River
Comprehensive
Demonstration
35
70
River
Technology
Demonstration
15
15
River
Comprehensive
Demonstration
35
70
River
Hai River/
Haihe/
(inflow)
31
Expenditure (Million
RMB)
Theme
30
60
River
Three gorges/
Technology
Demonstration
20
30
Lake
Key
catchment/
Industrialization
30
60
Monitoring and
Warning
32
Table 12. Projects funded under the fourth call for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control (funded by the MEP)
Project No.
Project Name
Implementing Unit
Principal Investigator
Attribute
Local organizational
joint trial unit
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Chongqing City/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Heilongjiang Province/
2014ZX072010 Technology research and comprehensive Northeast Normal University/ Jiang Feng/
11
demonstration of comprehensive
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Jilin Province/
2012ZX07104 Technology and project demonstration China Institute of Water Resources and
of comprehensive management and
Hydropower Research/ Huaidong Zhou/ ( specialist member in theme one)
treatment of water pollution in Three
(http://www.waterscience.cn/zhuanjiaku/zhouhuaidong.ht
Gorges Reservoir/
m)
Jiahu Yuan/
(http://www.craes.cn/cn/hkyr/zhouyx.html)
environment/
33
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Heilongjiang Province/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Liaoning Province/
Min Ji/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Tianjin City/
Qingyi Meng/
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Beijing/
34
Industrialization
2013ZX07502 Research and demonstration programme China National Environmental Monitoring Yeyao Wang/ ( specialist member in theme five)
of monitoring technology system for
Centre (CNEMC)/
(http://www.cnemc.cn/publish/totalWebSite/news/news_1
catchment aquatic ecology/
7.html)
35
Common/ Generic
Technology
Programme Name
Central
Local
65
70
65
65
60
Research and demonstration of regulatory system, and support technology for the
treatment of urban water pollutants/
20
N/A
22
N/A
36
Programme Name
1. Research into monitoring technology of water quality from the source to the tap, and the
standardization of the drinking water/
2. Development demonstration of monitoring and managing technology of municipal water supply
systems, and its business operation platform/
1. Research on the emergency water supply technology, and demonstration of emergency
capability development in the key areas/
Central
Local
20
N/A
45
40
2.Research on pollutant characteristics of water source and security strategy of the drinking water
safety in key river catchments/
45
N/A
3. Technology integration and comprehensive demonstration of water supply in urban and rural
areas of Jiangsu Province/
60
50
35
40
2. Research and demonstration of key technology for intelligent management system of urban
water supply pipeline network/
45
N/A
3. Research and application of original technology for removing special pollutants (e.g. organic
pollutants like chlorinated solvents, and radionuclides) in drinking water/
80
4. Research and demonstration of the technology of optimizing the dispatch of water supply from
the water source, and securing the water quality in Chaohu City/
5. Technology system development of securing the safety water supply for the rural, and its largescale application in key river catchments/
37
Table 15. MEP Generalist Evaluators for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control
Name
Institution
Job Title
Segregation of Duty
Field
Environmental Science/
Wei Meng/
(http://www.craes.cn/cn/kydw/yszj.html )
Academician of Academy of
Engineering /
Jining Chen/
(http://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/th/6176/i
ndex.html )
Tsinghua University/
Professor/ (Chancellor of
Tsinghua University)
Environmental System
Analysis/
Researcher/
Member/
Technical Economy/
Researcher/
Member/
Environmental Science/
Researcher/
Member/
Environmental Science/
Tsinghua University/
Professor/
Member/
Environmental Engineering/
Researcher/
Member/
Environmental Economics/
Bin Yi/
(http://www.chinacses.org/c/cn/news/201202/09/news_3967.html )
Researcher/
Member/
Environmental Technology/
Member/
Environmental Chemistry/
Researcher/
Member/
Environmental Science/
Member/
Researcher/
Member/
Environmental Management/
Researcher/
Member/
Agro-ecology/
Zijian Wang/
(http://sourcedb.rcees.cas.cn/zw/zjrck/yjy/2009
06/t20090612_1038198.html )
Yeyao Wang/
(http://www.cnemc.cn/publish/totalWebSite/ne
ws/news_17.html)
Kaijun Wang/
(http://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/env/6422
/2011/20110219161451921795862/2011021916
1451921795862_.html)
Binghui Zheng/
(http://www.craes.cn/cn/hkyr/zhengbh.html )
Xingcan Zheng/
(http://www.cadreg.com.cn/tabid/148/InfoID/6
741/frtid/180/Default.aspx)
Bing Ke/ (No Profile)
Xurong Mei/
(http://211.147.18.70/templates/jiaoyu_001_1/
second.aspx?nodeid=217&page=ContentPage&c
38
Tongji University/
Professor/
39
Member/
Environmental Engineering/
Table 16. MEP Specialist Evaluators for the Major Science and Technology Programme for Water Pollution Control
Name
Institution
Job Title
Field
Research Interests
Jinan WANG/
Nanjing University/
Researcher/
&
Team Leader/
Professor/
&
Deputy Chief/
Environmental
Economics/
Environmental
Management/
N/A
Zhong MA/
Professor/
Environmental
Economics/
Yi WANG/
Researcher/
Environmental
Economics/
Junhao WANG/
Professor/
Ming SU/
Researcher/
Industrial
economics/
Economics/
Shiqiu Zhang/
Peking University/
Professor/
Environmental
policy/
Hongxing ZHANG/
Senior engineer/
Water resources
conservation/
Environmental
technology/
Jun BI/
Bin YI/
Researcher/
40
Shangbin GAO/ (
Linwei ZHANG/
Chazhong GE/
Researcher/
Environmental
Policy/
Researcher/
Agricultural
Environment/
Deputy Inspector/
Urban Water
Management/
N/A
Researcher/
Environmental
Economics Policy/
41
2.3.1.2
The NSFC is regarded as one of the most transparent and fairest funding opportunities at national level for
fundamental research and is often used as the vehicle to link Chinas involvement with collaborative international
research programmes which require matched funding.
The NSFC have a series of funding schemes including the Major Programme, Key Programme and General
Programme. Water-related projects are funded under all three themes but the information on them was difficult to
extract as the NSFC funds its research based around eight subject categories, (Mathematical and Physical Sciences,
Chemical Sciences, Life Sciences, Earth Sciences, Engineering and Materials Sciences, Information Sciences,
Management Sciences, Health Sciences) and water projects could appear in any of them.
For this report, the Major Programme was examined as it supported the highest number of projects. According to
the NSFC annual reports, the Major Programme supported very few water projects between 2003 and 2010
although did fund the Long-term Ecological Effect/ Impact of Large-scale Hydraulic Project on the Important
Biological Resources in the Yangtze Basin () project in
2004. This project was managed by Dr Jianbo Chang () from Institute of Hydrobiology, CAS (
) and was worth 8 million RMB between 2004-200712 [24]. In 2011, two water projects were funded to
run between 2012-2016. One was the 20 million RMB Multi phase transfer and its effect of water body in the third
pole geo system project [25] () [26] managed by Dr Yao Tandong (
) from Institute of Tibetan Plateau, CAS and the other project was the Theory and
method of engineering hydraulic computation in changing environment project (
) coordinated by Professor Xi Chen () from Hehai University (), which was worth 15 million
RMB.
2.3.2
International collaboration
There have been several significant European - China collaborations in water research over the last two decades
operating at the level of the EU, Member States and Associated Countries. In more recent years, several
international companies have also participated in water security projects in China (e.g. Atkins and Veolia).
2.3.2.1
EU-China
There is a long history of the EU funding water research in China. A selection of those related to groundwater and
irrigation are presented in Table 17. The size of these projects is varied but there have been significant multi-million
Euro investments.
12
The maximum size of the grant at this time was 10 million RMB.
42
(1)
The EU-China River Basin Management Programme aimed to support the Chinese Ministry of Water Resources,
Ministry for Environmental Protection and related Chinese partners, especially River Basin Commissions to enhance
integrated river basin management (IRBM) policies and practices by sharing EU experience and best practices and
helped to support the development of the 2011 No.1 Document on Accelerating Water Conservancy Reform and
Development which was influenced by the EU Water Framework Directive (2000). RBMP ran between 2007 2012
and had a total value of 186 million (EuropeAid contributed 25 million, the Chinese government contributed 79
million and the World Bank 82.5 million).
One of principal legacies of the EU China River Basin Management Programme, was the China Europe Water
Platform (CEWP) which was launched in 2012 following a joint agreement between the Ministry of Water Resources
of the PRC and the Presidency of the Council of the European Union, represented by the Danish Minister of the
Environment [27]. This Platform is designed to maintain the dialogue on water resources policy, management,
research and private sector involvement regarding water challenges, between China and the EU and its Member
States and associated countries and provide more opportunities for businesses and researchers between China and
the EU [21].
The China-EU 2020 Strategic Agenda for Cooperation was released at the 16th China-EU Summit where the ChinaEU Water Platform was used as a vehicle to promote water policy dialogue, enhance joint scientific research and
business cooperation in the three areas identified by the 2011 No.1 Document Three Red Lines. Currently, CEWP is
focussing on developing EU-China collaboration in the following areas:
Water quantity (water scarcity, drought, ground water, urban water systems, water and security
nexus),
Water use efficiency (water recycling, industrial water use, water and food nexus, water and
energy nexus),
Water quality (pollution reduction, river basin management), and water disasters [28].
These topics are all progressing and there have been a series of meetings and workshops in the last year to better
described potential areas of research. Further information as it develops is available from the CEWP website
(http://cewp.org/).
(2)
SPRING (FP7)
The FP7 SPRING project (Scoping Chinas Environmental Research Excellence and Major Infrastructure: foresight,
potentials and roadmaps) [29] ran a series of EU-China workshops between 2010-2013 to identify the main research
challenges in the areas of climate change, water, atmosphere, biodiversity, soil and natural disasters.
43
2.3.2.2
(1)
There have been several small Sino-Danish initiatives in water research which have mainly focused on education,
PhD studentships and academic exchanges (Table 18 lists those in the areas of groundwater).
(2)
Sino-Dutch Cooperation
The Joint Scientific Thematic Research Programme (JSTP) is a Sino-Dutch scientific programme for research
collaboration. Between 2009-2013, it funded the Integrated Water Management in Relation to Climate Change and
Sea Level Rise project involving the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NOW), The Royal Netherlands
Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) and their Chinese
partner organisations (CAS, CASS and MoST) [30]. Both the Chinese and Dutch sides contributed 3 million to the
project.
This programme had four themes:
Predictability of extreme drought and rainfall, especially monsoons and typhoons,
Links between hydrology, morphodynamics and hydrochemistry in relation to policy in the areas of ecology and
sediment management,
Groundwater extraction and management of peat areas,
Management of water-rich areas via information from satellites and sensors.
44
SAFIR4EU
http://www.safir4
eu.org/
EU-funded
Title
RECLAIM WATER
(http://www.istworld.org/Project
Details.aspx?Proje
ctId=cdf4c9803a3
64e4b81cf8997d4
1e74b7 )
Water Reclamation
Technologies for safe
artificial groundwater
recharge
EU-funded
Period
Partners
Chinese Partners
Other Partners
20052009
20052008
Tsinghua University
19982002
Impact of climate
variability on agroecosystems and water
resources in drylands
19972000
19941998
45
AsemWaterNet
EU-funded
Multi-stakeholder
platform for ASEM S&T
cooperation on
sustainable water use
19941998
20052009
46
Where
What
Who
When
Funding
Danish Contact
WHATER4COASTS
Laizhou Bay
SV of Beijing
Saline water
instrusion
20142016
Beijing
2010
Shandong
Groundwater
mapping
20102011
China North
Plain
PhD project,
Modellng of the
NCP with RS input
20082010
2010
20102012
20112012
China
China North
Plain
China
47
3.
Urban Agriculture
3.1
Introduction
The worlds human population is expected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050 from its 2013 level of 7.2 billion [31]. This
growth has major implications on how natural resources are allocated and may be protected for future generations.
An added dynamic to this population expansion is the redistribution of populations towards urbanised areas (both
migration from rural areas and expansion of the existing urban population). China and India have experienced the
most extreme cases of this phenomena and it is estimated that 276 million people in China and 218 million in India
will occupy urban areas by 2030 [31].
China is the worlds most populous nation [31]. In 2013, the population size reached 13.86 billion, or 19.3% of the
worlds total, and its size is expected to reach almost 14 billion by 2025 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Estimated and predicted population growth in P.R. China (1950 2025) [32]
Since the 1978 Reform and Open Policy (), major changes have been observed in the distribution of Chinas
population as individuals have increasingly migrated from rural areas to urban areas attracted by the higher salaries
and better opportunities for work [32, 33]. The proportions of the population residing in rural and urban areas are
currently approximately equal (Figure 2), but there has been a rapid decline in the annual growth rate of rural
populations since 1973, and a more gradual decline in the annual growth rate of urban populations since 1980-85
48
following the avocation of birth control by the highest political levels [34] and the introduction of birth control as a
state policy following the 12th Party Congress [35] (Figure 3).
The rapid expansion of Chinas urban population has resulted in unprecedented demands for resources such as
water, energy and food in urban areas which have not been observed in other developed countries which have
undergone urbanisation at a more gradual pace.
49
Figure 3. The annual growth rate of urban-rural populations in P.R. China between 1950-2025 [32]
3.2
Food security is a critical issue in China as its population accounts for one fifth of the worlds total but accounts for
only nine percent of the worlds land. To compound matters, it is estimated that the per capita availability of arable
land is less than 40% of the worlds average and the per capita availability of freshwater around 28% of the worlds
average [36].
Ensuring food security in China is a top priority of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), and
the last eleven No.1 Documents 13 have focused on agriculture, food security, farmers and rural reform ()
or closely related subjects (e.g. water) (Table 1). For example, the 2014 No.1 Document identified the following
priority areas:
13
The No.1 Document (or No. 1 Central Document) is the first policy document issued by the CPC and the State Council every
year and outlines the top priority of the coming year.
50
Theme
Boosting Farmers' Incomes [38]
Strengthening Rural Work and Improving the Overall Production Capacity of Agriculture [38].
Developing Modern Agriculture and Steadily Promoting the Construction of A New Socialist Countryside
[38]
Fortifying the Foundation of Agriculture [38]
Achieving Steady Agricultural Development and Sustained Income Increases for Farmers [38]
Speeding Up Coordinated Development Between Urban and Rural Areas and Further Cementing
Foundation of Agricultural and Rural Area Development [38]
Underscoring the Importance of Scientific and Technological Innovation for Sustained Agricultural
Growth [39]
Pledging to Accelerate Agricultural Modernization and Rural Development [40]
Underscoring the Importance of Rural Reforms, Developing Modern Agriculture and Maintaining
Agriculture As the Foundation of the National Economy [37]
Whilst Chinas agricultural policies are undergoing high-level reform, its population is also experiencing a period of
dietary transition [41] which is affecting both human health [42, 43] and global food markets [44]. Since 1989, the
consumption of rice has declined with observed increases in the consumption of wheat and animal-derived foods.
Consumption patterns in both rural and urban populations have followed similar trends during this period (Tables 2 -
51
5), although the overall quantities of food consumed by urban populations were higher than in rural areas with
significant differences in the quantities of animal-derived and processed foods consumed (Tables 4 & 5)14.
Table 2. Daily consumption (g.day-1) of plant-derived foods by Chinas rural population between 1989-2004
arranged in order of total size across all years [41]
Food type
Rice
Wheat
Other cereals
Legumes and products
Tubers
Fresh fruit
Vegetables1
1989
362
314
193
44
174
30
86
1991
338
302
196
59
95
22
37
1993
335
303
211
52
98
21
39
1997
312
292
193
49
91
30
34
2000
290
277
154
60
78
30
22
2004
295
377
173
54
47
32
18
Table 3. Daily consumption (g.day-1) of plant-derived foods by Chinas urban population between 1989-2004
arranged in order of total size across all years [41]
Food type
Rice
Wheat
Other cereals
Tubers
Legumes and products
Vegetables15
Fresh fruit
1989
316
242
183
71
88
37
27
1991
336
238
194
59
91
22
22
1993
284
234
169
89
66
26
28
1997
262
239
153
86
67
34
35
2000
237
262
146
91
70
30
30
2004
243
313
152
80
29
36
35
Both the size of Chinas population and its changes in dietary behaviour has led to an increasing dependence on food
produced by foreign countries and food demands from China now have a huge impact on global food markets and
subsequently global food security. For instance, currently China imports 5% of its maize which is roughly equivalent
to a third to a half of all maize traded internationally so changes in demand in China affect the global trade and
production of this crop [44]. A more serious concern is the fact that if China were faced with a crisis in its domestic
grain production, it would require approximately twice the amount of grain traded internationally to support its
population [45].
14
It has been argued that migrant workers moving from rural to urban areas may also have exacerbated these dietary trends. A
study conducted by the Development Research Centre of the State Council suggested that migrant workers who move to urban
areas consumed 119.14 kg more crop per person per year compared to rural residents, but which was also 51.04 kg more than
each urban resident 36. China Economic Times (). Food security: China's food security in globalisation/
. 2013; Available from:
http://www.moa.gov.cn/fwllm/qgxxlb/hn/201311/t20131126_3686389.htm.
15
52
The increasing dependence on overseas food production has led to high level concerns within China about how to
guard the countrys food security and has led to the introduction of policies aimed at making the country more selfsufficient in certain staple food stuffs [45].
Table 4. Daily consumption (g.day-1) of animal-derived and processed foods by Chinas rural population between
1989-2004 arranged in order of total size across all years [41]
Food type
Pork
Fish
Eggs and products16
Poultry
Other meats17
Animal fat
Cakes
Milk and products18
Sugar
1989
44
22
9
4
4
19
1
1
8
1991
59
21
13
7
5
14
3
2
5
1993
52
20
12
6
6
11
1
1
4
1997
49
25
20
10
6
10
2
1
6
2000
60
25
23
12
6
12
1
2
6
2004
54
28
23
13
11
7
6
6
5
Table 5. Daily consumption (g.day-1) of animal-derived and processed foods by Chinas urban population between
1989-2004 arranged in order of total size across all years [41]
Food type
Pork
Fish
Eggs and products2
Poultry
Other meats3
Milk and products4
Cakes
Animal fat
Sugar
1989
71
27
16
12
7
5
2
15
8
1991
59
22
15
7
6
5
1
12
4
1993
89
28
22
14
12
7
4
9
7
1997
86
35
33
17
16
9
5
9
8
2000
91
30
32
19
15
17
5
12
6
2004
80
35
33
19
25
25
8
4
4
A target of becoming 95% or 90% self-sufficient in food or crop19 production was first proposed in 1996 in China's
White Paper on Food Issues () [46]. It was then announced in 2006 that a target of 1.8
16
53
the international data of the same name. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UNFAO), describes grain as
wheat, rice and coarse food grain (which covers grains such as maize, barley, and sorghum). In China, grain refers mainly to rice,
wheat, and maize (which together formed 98.4% of the total grain production in China in 2011).
20
This figure was derived from estimates of factors such as crop consumption per person, the crop yield per unit, the multiple
cropping index, the food demand forecast and the predicted demand for cultivated land [17].
21
th
The 11 Five-Year operated between 2006 and 2010.
22
The Land Use Planning Frameworks covers four key issues regarding the land use, two of which relate to agriculture. One is
described as primary farmland (land which should not fall below 1.56 billion hectares and its quality should be
improved) and the other is reserved land for cultivation () (of which 1.818 billion hectares was planned to be kept
by 2010, and 1.805 billion hectares by 2020). Primary farmland is defined as the land reserved for cultivation for a certain period
calculated with reference to population and domestic economic demands and the prediction of the construction land use during
certain period. Reserved land for cultivation does not have to be primary farmland, and the primary farmland is protected by
law and its function cannot be shifted [17].
23
Director General of the Research Centre of Rural Economy in Development Research Centre of the State Council of the
Peoples Republic of China.
54
Alternative strategies of improving self-sufficiency are being investigated and there are excellent opportunities for
international collaboration in this area. The fundamental strategy is to improve productivity and yield per unit area
which will require significant modernisation of the Chinese agricultural industry. The Chinese government is using a
variety of approaches to achieve its self-sufficiency targets including the following:
maintaining and supporting innovation in agricultural management (including the control of reserved land
for cultivation [45], improved governance mechanisms, subsidies for farmers to continue farming and the
adoption of large-scale farming and means of operations, rural-urban development towards agricultural
modernization and agricultural product monitoring network [51]);
strengthening the agricultural infrastructure system (particularly improving soil quality, further R&D in
agricultural technologies and farming techniques, and improved distribution and logistics systems) [45];
supporting the development of sustainable agriculture by promoting new technology applications (including,
developing new breeds, enhancing agricultural green production, and the restoration of polluted soils and
water [51] ), accelerating the technology cluster development to build a platform for innovation, improving
food safety, and reducing food waste;
increasing the number of talents in the area of agricultural science and technology [49, 50].
In 2012, the No.1 Document emphasised the importance of innovation in agricultural science and technology in
addition to the need for the training and education of talent [52] in this area of science. In order to improve land
yield, resource efficiency and labour productivity, it specified that technological innovation and agricultural research
should focus on [53]:
The enforcement of basic research, especially in developing the major basic theory and approaches
agriculture, in terms of agricultural genetically modified organisms (), molecular breeding
(), the resistance mechanism of forestry, animal and plant (), high-efficient
utilization of agricultural resources (), agricultural ecological restoration (),
pest control (), bio-safety, food safety () and so on.
Accelerating research in cutting-edge technology to lead agricultural modernisation and achieve major
advancements in domestic innovation in agricultural bio-technology ( ), information
technology (), advanced material technology (), advanced manufacturing technology
(), precision agriculture () and so on.
Major achievements in practical technology are needed to overcome the agricultural technology bottleneck.
This includes improving good quality breeding (), efforts to save costs and lower consumption (
), water- saving irrigation (), agricultural machinery equipment (), new fertilizer
(), disease prevention and control / epidemic control (), product processing, storage and
55
3.3
Urban Agriculture
In an era of increasing urbanisation and population size, and faced with a population which is undergoing a period of
dietary transition creating demands for high resource value foods, the Chinese government is facing significant
challenges to meet the nutritional needs and food demands of its population. In particular, the process of
urbanisation which is correlated to increased wealth, higher purchasing power, higher consumption rates has led to
a greater demand for processed food, meat, dairy and fish and is exacerbating Chinas food crisis. There are also
issues related to labour shortages as individuals migrate from rural to urban areas.
Urbanisation adds more pressure to the food supply chain and requires changes in the way that food is produced,
stored, processed, distributed and accessed. It has also led to fundamental changes in the pressures facing the
agricultural industry worldwide. The first change is an increasing gap between the supply and demand of food stuffs
of particular importance to urban populations. For example, maize is used largely as animal feed in China and there
is a growing shortage of domestically produced maize with increasing pork production. Moreover, there are even
more obvious shortages in soybeans, edible vegetable oil, sugar and cotton (the self-sufficiency rates are 18%, 40%,
80% and 75% respectively) [50]. The second change is that traditional agricultural production tends to be clustered
around the main production areas so food stuffs need to travel long distances to reach the consumers in the towns
and cities. The third change is the growing attention of consumers on the quality and security of agricultural
products. This is a particular issue for China which has suffered from several high profile food safety issues in recent
years. As a result, there is increased interest in modern urban agriculture (UA) 24 practices from the public and
private sectors, NGO and individuals both in China and abroad. The United Nations has even argued that urban
farming needs to play a bigger role in feeding city populations [59]. The exploitation of urban areas for agriculture is
particularly attractive as these areas normally attract high levels of investment and human capital and provide a
market for high quality and high value produce. Moreover, it has also been argued that urban agriculture contributes
not only to economic development of these areas, but also supports the ecological, environmental and social
development of urban systems [60] and reduces the disparity between rural and urban citizens [61, 62].
Urban agriculture has very different characteristics to traditional forms of agriculture and is more likely to attract
ecological and green agricultural techniques, agro-tourism, highly market-oriented agriculture and cutting edge
science and technology. However, the increased operating costs of urban agriculture resulting from the increased
value of urban land compared to rural and increased labour cost may hinder development. There may also be issues
related to food safety and whether it is safe to cultivate food in urban soils and water.
24
The growing of plants and the raising of animals within and around cities 58. RUAF. What is urban agriculture? 2013 [cited
2013 18/10]; Available from: http://www.ruaf.org/node/512/%20Urban%20Agriculture%20What%20%26%20Why.
57
3.4
Although there has been limited specific mention of urban agriculture in official policy documents, several initiatives
have been mentioned which could be defined as such.
First, the National Development Plan for the Agriculture Modernisation () in 2012
identified peri-urban areas as the most likely candidate areas for the development of modern multi-functional
agriculture which would mean that urban agriculture is leading the modernisation of all the fields of agriculture [63].
Second, the 2012 No.1 Document called for middle25 and large26 sized cities to increase their capacity to supply fresh
food to their inhabitants so as to be more resilient under emergency situations. It also aimed to improve the land
yield, resource efficiency and labour productivity through the innovation of agricultural science and technology [64]
which are key characteristics of urban agriculture. The 2014 No.1 Document further supported this approach when it
demanded that radical approaches be taken to achieve agricultural modernisation by intensifying science and
technology innovation in agriculture, investing in agricultural infrastructure and equipment, and accelerating the
distribution of agricultural products [50, 54].
Third, under the National Development Plan for the Agriculture Modernisation, the cadres evaluation is directly
linked to the main indices of urban and modern agricultural development (such as crop production, farmers income
and cultivated land conservation) and directly affects their career progression [65]. The Rice Bag system for
Provincial Governors ()27 and the Basket responsibility system for Mayors (
)28, are used to ensure that both levels of government are directly responsible for food supplies. Examples of this
system in operation include Beijing and Shanghai. Both cities employ an urban agriculture index which considers
parameters such as the cities:
Development of urban agriculture areas including pilot areas of multi-functional agriculture, modern
agriculture demonstration area and agricultural cluster areas.
25
26
This refers to the cities with a population scale between 0.2 0.5 million.
This refers to the cities with a population scale 0.5 - 1 million.
27
Provincial governors are required to ensure food security by stabilising crop production and ensuring that food prices are
steadied by balancing the supply and the demand of crops within their own geographical boundaries.
28
Mayors are required to ensure food security by stabilising the non-staple food production and ensuring that food price are
steadied by balancing the supply and the demand of the non-staple food within their own geographical boundaries.
29
It refers to the proportion of the fresh agricultural products production produced within the city in the general fresh
agricultural product production. Fresh agricultural products are recommended to be able to self-supplied to some extent by
each city or town itself.
58
During the 12th Five-Year Plan Period (2011 2015), Beijing planned to transform 1370 farms to zero emission farms
with no pollution. Around 500 farms were converted by 2012 and the rest are due to for completion by the end of
2015 [63].
To conclude, urban agriculture has been promoted across China as an approach to address its food security and to
promote international cooperation in S&I and global trade. The provincial and municipal authorities have been given
rights and responsibility to be innovative using local finance to secure its food supply with a range of flexible and
diverse incentives. The clear and divided responsibility between the central government and the local government
may encourage the development of urban agriculture with a shared the common goal, but adopt innovative
approaches according to local conditions.
3.4.1
The economic benefits of urban agriculture are less rewarding than those from other industries such as real estate
and property development and it is highly likely that government incentives will be required to develop this form of
farming beyond demonstrator systems. The Chinese government has traditionally supported farmers with high levels
of incentives for grain production [66] but whether they would be willing to extend this to the more niche markets of
urban agriculture is uncertain. Certainly, there have been overarching government reforms which have involved the
public sector responding directly to marketization and supporting innovation [67], but the returns on modern urban
agriculture may be extremely modest [63].
3.4.2
The major national funding schemes provided by the state are open applications for research and development of
urban agriculture. These agencies include the Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST), Ministry of Agriculture
(MoA), Ministry of Education (MoE), Ministry of Land and Resources (MoLR), the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (NSFC), Ministry of Water Resources (MWR) , Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP), the
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the China Scholarship Council (CSC). Each funding agency funds a range of
programmes of different scale and duration and which are targeted at specific researchers) related to factors such as
age, nationality and professional seniority).
One of the main funders of S&T is the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) whose funding system
consists of three categories of programme: Research Promotion (RP) (), Talent Fostering (TF) (
) and Infrastructure Construction for Basic Research (ICFBR) (). In 2012, the NSFC
allocated 16.476 billion RMB to RP programmes, 0.374 billion RMB to TF and 0.15 billion RMB to ICFBR [68]. As the
majority of NNSFC funding was allocated to its RP Programme, the NSFCs research interests can be captured by
analysing its funding distribution amongst this specific programme.
59
The RP programme is further sectioned into the following schemes: General Programme (), Key
Programme (), Major Programme , Major Research Plan Programme and
International Cooperation Programme [69]. The majority of the funding is awarded to
the General Programme which also supports the highest number of projects (in 2012, 12.48 billion RMB was
awarded to 16,891 General Programme projects (approximately 0.739 million RMB per project with a 19.24 %
success rate)). The other schemes fund a smaller number of projects than the General Programme but with higher
resources per project (in 2012, 18 Major Programmes were awarded a total of 0.322 billion RMB (approximately
17.889 million RMB per project); Key Programmes were awarded approximately 2.913 million RMB per project (with
a 19.45 % success rate) and 355 projects were awarded a total of 0.710 billion RMB under the Major Research Plan
Programme (approximately 2 million RMB per project) [68].
The funding available from the NSFC has been increasing year on year. In the General Programme, the total value of
projects in 2001 was 0.8 billion RMB shared amongst 4435 projects (approximately 0.180 million RMB per project)
[36], and went up to 8.989 billion RMB for 15329 project in 2011 (0.586 million RMB per project) [33], 12.48 billion
RMB for 16891 projects in 2012 (0.739 million RMB per project) [34] and to 12 billion RMB for 16194 projects in
2013 (0.741 million RMB per project) [35]. The proportion of the funds allocated to food science, basic agronomy
and crop science has remained relatively stable from 14.10% in 2011 [70], 14% in 2012 [68] and 14.23% in 2013 [71].
3.5
Information on the funding allocated specifically to urban agriculture is difficult to obtain as there is no formal
classification of these projects under the main funding schemes aside from agriculture. Nevertheless inferences can
be drawn from identifying the main research centres on urban agriculture and identifying the most active academics
in this area and by examining their main areas of interest. Much of the following information was obtained from
Chinese websites without English translations and would be difficult for non-Chinese speakers to access.
3.5.1
National and Ministerial Key Laboratories30 are used to deliver cutting-edge research in specific fields of science and
technology. There are two Key Laboratories which focus on urban agriculture in China, one located in the north and
one in the south of the country and which have been running since 2009. The Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture
(North) Ministry of Agriculture (KLUAN, ) is a collaboration between Beijing University of Agriculture
(), China Agricultural University (), and the Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry
30
In order to improve the level and capability of innovation in China, the 2010 No.1 Document explicitly mentioned that the
development of key labs needed to be strengthened. This was reinforced by the Outline of the National Program for Long and
Medium- Term Scientific and Technological Development.
60
Germplasm innovation using high-efficiency production techniques and low carbon technology
()
Reports from 2013 showed that KLUAS had received 150 million RMB of research funding since it was established in
2008 [73]. Of this funding, 60% originated from public sources at national and ministerial levels (Table 5). The
majority of projects were funded by the NNSFC General Programme and the Shanghai Municipal Government which
clearly shows that both national and municipal level funding sources are important for research in urban agriculture.
General Programmes and Key Programmes, who participated funding the KLUAS, have been all increasing its general
amount and its intensive extent, as to support research and innovation (R&D).
61
3.5.2
The following projects were identified using internet searches on Baidu31. No projects were identified when
National Natural Science Foundation of China and Urban Agriculture were entered in English, but two projects
were identified with National Natural Science Foundation of China and Peri Agriculture (Table 6).
Only a few more urban agriculture projects were identified using Chinese search terms. Table 7 shows the results
from when (NSFC) and Urban Agriculturewere entered into Baidu.
Number of
projects
31
7
2
2
> 70
1
9
3 (including 2
sub-topics)
1
> 70
~ 10
Baidu was selected as the search engine for this exercise rather than the more internationally-famous Google as it is more
reliable and more commonly used within China where there are issues with access to international websites.
62
Table 6. NSRC-funded urban agriculture projects identified using English search terms
Funding Programme
Project Name
Grant (RMB)
Note
Daoyou Huang as Team Leader. Director of Agricultural Resources and Environment Branch, China
1,000,000
Three pilot projects have been developed, which serve as examples for both farmers and policy
(http://www.ruaf.org/node/495#intro )
makers.
Frequent communication between practitioners, policy makers and researchers via personal
contact, domestic meetings and an international workshop, has been established.
A network on peri-urban agriculture has been established, which is expanding to other cities
N/A
63
Table 7. NSRC-funded urban agriculture projects identified using Chinese search terms
Funding Programme
Project Name
Grant
Note
Available information in Chinese; It took 2 years and was submitted on 28th Dec, 2013.
Foundation Programme/
(http://news.bvca.edu.cn/article/2014-1-
(9122010) [76]
2/article59_13952.html )
(http://pub.nsfc.gov.cn/pinscn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=199
Brn1 Sod
36&flag=1)
Scd1 Brn1
mRNA
: ,mRNA,
N/A
The Joint Funding
CIAT
Programme between
CGIAR (
) and National
CIMMYT
Natural Science
Foundation of China in
2013 (
CIMMYT
64
[78](http://www.nsfc.go
v.cn/Portal0/InfoModule
CIMMYT
_396/52267.htm )
These 9 programmes
sponsored with
IFPRI
2018.
General
Programme
,2012 1 2016 12
2013-1-1-2016-12-31 (2012 )
[]
700,000
65
3.5.3
The importance of acknowledging senior experts in research proposals cannot be underestimated when applying for
Chinese research grants. Applications which do not cite the evaluators research are unlikely to be approved.
The names and contact details of the primary Chinese experts working in urban agriculture are listed in Table 8.
66
Name
Institution
Title
Director of Agricultural
Resources and
Daoyou
Huang
Environment Branch,
China Agricultural
Association, Society of
Peri - urban Agriculture
of Hunan Province
Contact
Experience
Research Interest
Tel: (86)-731-84615227
Fax: (86)-731-84612685
E-mail: dyhuang@isa.ac.cn
Web:
http://sourcedb.cas.cn/sourcedb_isa_cas/yw/expe
rt_e/200905/t20090507_52464.html
polluted soils.
Coordinator of China
Regional Centre of RUAF
Foundation
China. 100101
Tel: +86-10-64889279
Fax: +86-10-64889279
Email: caijm@igsnrr.ac.cn
Website: http://www.cnruaf.com.cn/
Research areas in soil biology and
Institute of Subtropical
Agriculture, the Chinese
Academy of Sciences
(CAS), China
67
microbial transformations of
respectively.
carbon sequestration on
agricultural systems
Huang Biao
Emai:bhuang@issas.ac.cn
of Minerology,
Web:http://sourcedb.cas.cn/sourcedb_issas_cas/y
Petrology, and
w/rc/fas/200907/t20090724_2239510.html
Geochemistry Society of
China
State Key Lab. of Soil and Sustainable
Xuezheng
Shi
xzshi@issas.ac.cn
system
Weiping
Fax:0086-10-62849014
Chen
Environmental Sciences
liding@rcees.ac.cn
and bio-diversity
(RCEES), Chinese
http://sourcedb.rcees.cas.cn/yw/fs/200906/t2009
conservation;Landscape
Academy of Sciences
0612_1038163.html
pollution control
Email:
Web:
(CAS)
Sub-project coordinator
2004-2009: Land use pattern and ecological
processes. Sponsored by the Natural Science
Foundation of China. Project co-coordinator
68
3.5.4
The press release used to announce the 2014 No.1 Document was illustrated using several case studies of successful
agriculture projects, including efficient use of urban spaces through the co-location of a photovoltaic power stations
in Yancheng City, Jiangsu Province. The solar panels were mounted above a water body allowing aquaculture to
operate beneath [54].
3.5.5
Part of the attraction of investing in urban areas is that talents and capital tend to cluster in these areas. Plus there
are market motivations related to the increasing price of food, a growing market demand for high quality of fresh
(and safe) food in cities [79] and the revocation of agricultural tax in 2006 which was aimed at boosting the
agricultural industry and reduce the disparity between the rural and urban areas.
Commercial companies made at least 114 investments in agriculture in general in China between 2006 to the first
half of 2011 [79]. Of this, 1.76 billion USD were invested in 104 cases. In 2010, 0.891 billion USD of investment were
made in 47 cases suggesting that investments in agriculture are on the increase.
Several state-owned companies are investing in research and development in urban agriculture. These include
COFCO () which is state-owned company and the largest supplier of agricultural and food products in
China32 with its own product research and innovation division [80]. China Grain Reserves Corporation (), and
China National Agricultural Development Group Co., LTD () are investing likewise in this area.
32
COFCO-branded products includes Fortune Edible Oil, Great Wall Wine, Mengniu Dairy, Lohas Fruit and Vegetable Juice, Le
Conte chocolate, Tunhe tomato products and Joycome meat products.
69
2) LED Artificial Light for Plant Growth: Application of LED in seeding, planting leafy vegetable with LED,
application of LED in tissue culture.
3)
Remote Control: Realise online management and remote monitoring to control the vegetables growth
everywhere, with mobile phones, laptops, PDAs and other terminals, through the network transmission
systems.
4)
5) Energy-saving environmental control technology: Mobile Plant Factory, Product Line of Home Digital Plant
Factory, such as Angel Garden, E-Garden, and the first low-carbon intelligent plant factory in the world [82]
IEDA are currently seeking collaboration opportunities in vertical farming as it aims to develop skyscraper agriculture.
3.5.6
RUAF () is using Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu and Wuhan as demonstrator cities for urban
agriculture development. These schemes have largely been funded using municipal level funds.
The population of Beijing is still on the increase but stood at 20.6 million in 2011 in 2007 [75]. This has resulted in a
severe deterioration of its urban environment and a massive loss of farmland. In order to counter these impacts, the
Beijing Municipal Government established the 221 Programme which aimed to better promote urban agriculture
in three main areas:
The 221 project was considered a success as it led to dialogue between stakeholder groups, higher productivity
though more intensive farming, the creation of cooperatives to facilitate capacity building and a better
understanding of Beijings urban planning policy.
There have also been significant developments in urban agriculture in Chengdu where a Multi Stakeholder
Policymaking and Action Planning on Urban Agriculture (MPAP) was established. This resulted in the establishment
of models of participatory and multi-stakeholder planning, new models for urban agriculture related development
and support in finding technology assistance.
Whilst RUAF considered these initiatives a success, they have not moved beyond their pilot stages through a lack of
support and financial investment for urban agriculture [83]. However there is a greater government interest in
promoting agricultural tourism with plans for 100 agro-tourism villages and 1000 agricultural leisure parks to be
developed by the end of 12th Five-Year.
70
4. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank those researchers who have participated in the pilot study interviews for giving up
their time and allowing us to ask for their thoughts on how to improve EU-China scientific collaboration.
We are also grateful for the support of the whole DragonSTAR team, particularly Nondas Christofilopoulos, Daoliang
Li and Keqin Dong.
71
5.
References
1.
2.
3.
van Noorden, R., China tops Europe in R&D intensity. Nature, 2014. 505: p. 144-145.
Cao, C., et al., Reforming China's S&T System. Science, 2013. 341: p. 460-462.
US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Assessing China's efforts to become an 'innovation
society' - A progress report in US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, . 2012: Washington DC p.
178.
Benner, M., L. Liu, and S. Schwaag Serger, Head in the clouds and feet on the ground: Research priority
setting in China. Science and Public Policy, 2012. 39: p. 258-270.
NESTA, China's Absorptive State: Research, innovation and the prospects for China-UK collaboration, ed. K.
Bound, et al. 2013, London NESTA.
Oakman, H. Huawei to invest 10 million GBP in UK uni research 2013; Available from:
http://universitybusiness.co.uk/News/huawei_to_invest_10m_in_uk_uni_research.
University of Nottingham, Chinese aerospace business funds 3 million GBP University Innovation Centre 2012.
Sharma, Y. New proposals to help stem misuse of research funds 2013 Available from:
http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20131024150650403.
Qiu, J., Scientific Publishing: Identity crisis. Nature, 2008. 451: p. 766-767.
Liu, J. and W. Yang, Water sustainability for China and beyond. Science, 2012. 337: p. 649-650.
Cheng, H., Y. Hu, and J. Zhao, Meeting China's water shortage crisis: current practices and challenges.
Environmental Science and Technology, 2009. 43: p. 240-244.
Zhang, T. and Y. Huang, Impacts of climate change and inter-annual variability on cereal crops in China from
1980 to 2008. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2012. 92(8): p. 1643-1652.
Yang, H. and A. Zehnder, China's regional water scarcity and implications for grain supply and trade.
Environment and Planning A, 2001. 33: p. 79-95.
Brown, L.R. and B. Halweil, China's water shortage could shake world food security. World Watch 1998. 11(4):
p. 10-21.
Kahrl, F. and D. Roland-Holst, China's water-energy nexus. Water Policy, 2008. 10(SUPPL. 1): p. 51-65.
China Water Risk. 12th five year plan. 2011; Available from: http://chinawaterrisk.org/regulations/waterpolicy/12th-five-year-plan/.
Jiang, Y., China's water scarcity. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009. 90(11): p. 3185-3196.
Hug China. 2014; Available from: http://www.hugchina.com/photos/abc/2200015-rivers-of-china771x629.jpg.
MoST. . 2014 [cited 2014 21/03]; Available from:
http://www.nmp.gov.cn/zxjs/szx/201012/t20101208_2130.htm.
Hu, S.Y. Speech by the Vice Minister of Water Resources, PRC at the Press Conference of the State Council
Information Office 2012; Available from: http://www.china.org.cn/china/201202/17/content_24664293.htm.
CEWP. Briefing document CEWP inception workshop. 2014 23/03/2014].
China Water Risk. Overview of China's legal and supporting institutional framework 2014 30/03/14];
Available from: http://chinawaterrisk.org/regulations/regulatory-institutions/overview-ofchina%e2%80%99s-legal-and-supporting-institutional-framework/.
Office of Scientific Research of Peking University.
2014; Available from:
http://www.research.pku.edu.cn/Article_show.asp?ArticleID=2638.
NSFC. 2004 . 2004; Available from:
http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/ndbg/2004ndbg/05/006.htm.
NSFC. PART V statistics of application and funding for NSFC programs in 2011. 2011; Available from:
http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/Portals/0/fj/english/fj/report/2011/pdf/005.pdf.
NSFC. 2011 2011; Available from:
http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/ndbg/2011ndbg/05/03.html.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
72
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
China Europe water platform. China Europe water platform. 2012; Available from:
http://www.naturstyrelsen.dk/NR/rdonlyres/8E03FA0D-0A36-417B-915DE08B9113249F/141986/ChinaEuropeWaterPlatform.pdf.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of People's Republic of China. China-EU 2020 strategic agenda for cooperation
released at 16th China-EU summit. 2013 24/03/2014]; Available from:
http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/zxxx/t1101804.shtml.
EU. Scoping Chinas environmental research excellence and major infrastructure: Foresight, potentials, and
roadmaps (SPRING). 2013 Available from: http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/244156.
NWO. Joint scientific thematic research programme : Integrated water management in relation to climate
change and sea level rise. 2012; Available from: http://www.nwo.nl/en/research-andresults/programmes/JSTP++Integrated+Water+Management+in+Relation+to+Climate+Change+and+Sea+Level+Rise/background.
United Nations Population Division of Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World population
prospects: The 2012 revision, highlights and advance tables. 2013.
United Nations Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World urbanization
prospects: The 2011 revision. 2012.
Zhou, P., Urbanization, structure change and development strategy of urban agriculture. Journal of Shanghai
Jiaotong University (Agriculture Science), 2013. 31(Apr. 2013): p. 2.
National Health and Planning Planning Commission of People's Republic of China (
). []
2013 [cited 2014 28/03]; Available from:
http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/xcs/wzbd/201311/9382fa15040742f382e5f4beadd9355a.shtml.
National Health and Planning Planning Commission of People's Republic of China (
). []
2013 [cited 2014 28/03]; Available from:
http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/xcs/wzbd/201311/d152d5a07ec2445086e875cf9614fba5.shtml.
China Economic Times (). Food security: China's food security in globalisation/
. 2013; Available from:
http://www.moa.gov.cn/fwllm/qgxxlb/hn/201311/t20131126_3686389.htm.
Crienglish. No.1 central document focuses on rural issues 2014; Available from:
http://english.cri.cn/7106/2014/01/21/2001s809177.htm.
Xinhua. China targets rural issues in 9 consecutive No. 1 central documents. 2012 [cited 2014 19/03];
Available from: http://english.cri.cn/6909/2012/02/01/2021s678717.htm.
Xinhua. FACTBOX: China targets rural issues in 9 consecutive No. 1 central documents. 2012 [cited 2014
25/03]; Available from: http://english.cntv.cn/20120202/107551.shtml.
Xinhua. No. 1 central document focuses on rural issues 2013 [cited 2014 24/03]; Available from:
http://english.cntv.cn/20130131/107544.shtml.
Zhai, F., et al., Prospective study on nutrition transition in China. Nutrition Reviews, 2009. 67(SUPPL. 1): p.
S56-S61.
Popkin Barry, M., et al., Trends in diet, nutritional status, and diet-related noncommunicable diseases in
China and India: The economic costs of the nutrition transition. Nutrition Reviews, 2001. 59(12): p. 379-390.
Popkin, B.M., et al., The nutrition transition in China: A cross-sectional analysis. European Journal of Clinical
Nutrition, 1993. 47(5): p. 333-346.
Liu, L.P. The import of grain to China has been tripled. Whether to insist the agricultural 'red line' caused
arguments/ . 2013; Available from:
http://money.163.com/13/0110/08/8KRGN0T3002529T0.html.
Information Office of Ministry of Agriculture (). How to look at self-sufficiency rate of
grain in China - interview with researcher Changyun Jiang from institute of industrial and technological
economics of national development and reform commission, P.R. China (IITE/NDRC)/
73
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
http://www.moa.gov.cn/zwllm/zwdt/201302/t20130201_3214307.htm.
Ministry of Land and Resources Website (). The new round of prophase research result
report of the national planning for land was held in Beijing/
. 2006; Available from: http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2006-06/02/content_298489.htm.
Shandong Laiwu Bureau of Land Resources (). The origion of '1.8 billion hectares
agriculural land use area'/ 18 2011; Available from:
http://www.lwgtj.gov.cn/Item/9069.aspx.
Xinhua. The release of national land use planning framework (2006-2020)/
20062020 . 2008; Available from: http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2008-10/23/content_1129496.htm.
The Agricultural Edition of Henan Daily (). The lack of food in China: half numbers of
provinces can hardly achieve self-supply/ . 2013; Available from:
http://www.moa.gov.cn/fwllm/qgxxlb/hn/201307/t20130704_3512787.htm.
Farmer's Daily (). Constructing the national food security strategy under the new situation /
. 2014; Available from:
http://www.farmer.com.cn/xwpd/zjdp/201402/t20140211_937573.htm.
Sun, T.X. and J.J. Wu. The joint-statement given by Pijie He: 'To secure there are food in hand', and 'eat
healthy'/ . 2014; Available from:
http://news.eastday.com/eastday/13news/auto/news/china/u7ai904368_K4.html.
Xinhua. 2012 . 2012 [cited 2014 27/03]; Available
from: http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2012-02/01/c_111478030.htm.
Xinhua.
() 2012; Available from: http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2012-02/01/c_111478116_2.htm.
Xinhua. CPC No.1 document: Promoting agricultureal modernization through reform. 2014; Available from:
http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2014-01/20/content_2570635.htm.
Cheng, G.Q. The current circumstance and issue of using overseas agricultural resources. 2014; Available
from: http://www.drc.gov.cn/qwfb/20140121/4-459-2878572.htm.
Reuters. China to invest in 3 million hectares of Ukrainian farmland 2013 Available from:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/22/china-ukraine-idUSL3N0HI04620130922.
SCMP. Ukraine to become China's largest overseas farmer in 3m hectare deal. 2013 Available from:
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1314902/ukraine-become-chinas-largest-overseas-farmer-3mhectare-deal.
RUAF. What is urban agriculture? 2013 [cited 2013 18/10]; Available from:
http://www.ruaf.org/node/512/%20Urban%20Agriculture%20What%20%26%20Why.
Donald Cole, D.L.-S., George Nasinyama, Healthy city harvests: Generating evidence to guide policy on urban
agriculture. 2008: International Potato Center, convener for Urban Harvest and Makerere University Press.
Chongqing Agriculture Information Internet ().
. 2012 [cited 2014 26/02]; Available from:
http://www.cqncp.gov.cn/article/zczx/201210/18383480_1.html.
Xiao, S. and Z.M. He, The urban agriclture in Taiwan/ "". West China Development 2003.
CNRUAF. The position of urban agriculture and development strategy. 2012 [cited 2013 19/10]; Available
from: http://www.cnruaf.com.cn/news/inland/currentevents/2012/0205/157.html.
Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South) Ministry of Agriculture. Authoritative interpretation of
'developing urban and modern agriculture'/ 2012; Available from:
http://ua.sjtu.edu.cn/contentindex.jsp?colid=147&artid=15508.
Xinhua, China encourages agricultural technology innovation. 2012.
Ministry of Agriculture Website (). Ministry of Agriculture publisized the interpretation of the
National Development Plan for the Agriculture Modernization/
. 2012; Available from: http://www.gov.cn/xwfb/2012-02/14/content_2066728.htm.
74
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
Fortune Industry Perspectives and DuPont. China's insatiable appetite for change. in 2013 Fortune Global
Forum. 2013. Chengdu, China.
Xinhua. Keqiang Li: The breakthroughs in promoting reform of important areas/
. 2014; Available from: http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2014-03/05/c_133161883.htm.
NSFC. The fifth part: Annual report of NSFC funding and support in 2012/
2012 . 2012; Available from:
http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/ndbg/2012ndbg/05/01.html.
Mei, L.H., Experience & suggestions of applying National Natural Science Foundation Programme. 2014.
NSFC. The stastic data of NNSFC funding programmes for 2011/ 2011
. 2011.
NSFC. The stastic data of NNSFC funding programmes for 2013/ 2013
. 2013; Available from: http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/xmtj/pdf/2013_table.pdf.
Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South) Ministry of Agriculture. The introduction of the laboratory/
2013; Available from: http://ua.sjtu.edu.cn/contentindex.jsp?colid=146&artid=15964.
Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South) Ministry of Agriculture, The convocation of key laboratory of
urban agriculture (south) Ministry of Agriculture academic conference/ ()
2013 . 2013.
ISA. People. 2014; Available from:
http://sourcedb.cas.cn/sourcedb_isa_cas/yw/expert_e/200905/t20090507_52464.html.
RUAF. Beijing. RUAF Partner Cities 2010; Available from: http://www.ruaf.org/node/495#intro.
BVCA Research and Development Division ( ). The first NSFC project of BVCA has been
submitted/ . 2014; Available from:
http://news.bvca.edu.cn/article/2014-1-2/article59_13952.html.
Science Fund Journal Department. .
2014; Available from: http://pub.nsfc.gov.cn/pinscn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19936&flag=1.
Zhang, Y. 2013 . 2013;
Available from: http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/Portal0/InfoModule_396/52267.htm.
Deloitte, The new agricultural industry investment report in 2012/ 2012 .
2012.
COFCO. COFCO overview. 2012; Available from: http://www.cofco.com/en/about/c-482.html.
Liu, W.K., Q.C. Yang, and Z.P. Qiu, Spatiotemporal changes of nitrate and Vc contents in hydroponic lettuce
treated with various nitrogen-free solutions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 2012.
Wei, L.L., The exploration and application of urban agriculture. 2013.
MIT. Urban agriculture. 2014 [cited 2013 04/11].
75