Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No;22' .
,T
AUgUS1,16-31. 1983
\
->
Re,. 1
:8e!
Rural
women
ThOugh constituting half of . the rural population, rural women are yet to make
their rightful contribution to the amelioration of the rural society. Kept back
by
from
centuries
of
to helping their
menfolk
to various chores
in the farms.
The opportunities for their education were limited, that is why main thrust of
our rural development programmes has been io raise the standard of life of our
rural women.
, .-."
1
';,
-"i
.r.J:j}itiJriGI
.~.
I
...~
I
I.
-"
CONTENTS"
STEPPING UP'RURAL.W AREHOUSING
'.
of'import'of fo.odgrajnsduring
.
. the laSt two years has given rise to a. debate.
wh;ther we have really attained ~elf-~uffihiency in
foodgrains proouction. SOlfle'of the criticJ feer that .
'.after r~aping the fruits of, Green' Revolutio~ we have
. r~ached a level of stagnation 'i'n f~0d prod~>ticn and
something'ctIastic needs to be d<m:' if we have to
maintain a rate of growth in foodgrains proouction to
. THE
RESUMPTION
.[.
N.' K. Gandhi'
13
Vidya Rao
",
15
tiIne.
I '
'
.-'.
sio~"d
Pliliilla
...
...
:.
;._.
.
L:
.'.
.'
.nN.w
D.IhI.HUGOI
'.TeI: 387983
.'~ 'f
Vol. XXXI
No. 22
.August 16, 1983
Sravana 25, 1905'
..
.
....
.. '.
.
In tJ:iisissue we carry. a,higliIy informative article on
stePping up. warehousmg {acJ'lities:in our rotal :ire~s.
It js h0Pe4o~
.. "
',',read~~swill. find',it
....,. useful. I
'
"
,.
r
I
I
. .'
....,
N. K. GANDlll
Consultant, National P~ductiviry Council, ~ew Delhi
'T HEproductioI)
ADVENT
OF moden;t technolOgyin agricultural
has brought about a 6reakthrough in .
farm technology in India.
This has necessitated the
optimum utilisation. of limited fesources and the occurrence of .uncertain' factor associated with the' traditional Indian agriculture. Wiili the development in_
fann technology and consequent increase in agricul.tural production, marketed surpluses increased and
the storage facilities created to meet the need for sub..
sistence ianning have' not- simultaneously adopted the
change br~ught about by -the commercialized .Imming_
Extent of losseS
,
-'
-.HE'PRODUCTION
OF foodgrains in the counfry has
"
,
'observed a significant increase over the last 30
T
years.' It ;has reached a production level' of~133.
..
TABLE 1:
_ Yearwise AvaiiabilityofFoodgrains
..
,
Production
Year
1960-61
1961-62
1962-63
1963-64
1964-65
1965-66
1966-67
1967"68
1968.69
1969-70
1970m
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
_1975-76.
197,6-77
1977-78
1978-79
1979-80
.. '1981l-1l1
1981~82
82 -0.
82-7
80-2
80-6
8,9-4
72-3
74--2
95-1
94-q
99'5
108-4
105 -2
97-0
.140-7
99-8
'121-0
111-2
126-4 '
131-9
109 '7
129 ,6
33-1
Imports
.3.49
3 :63
4-54
6-25
7-<\4
10-31
8 :66
5-67
3-82
3-55
2-0\
-(O-~O)
3 -59
5'-16
7-54
6.92
0-99
-0,63
-0-86
-O'~5 _
0..45
1 -48
4'-26
4-39
- 5 -66
7.75
8,32
14-26
11 -67
5-98
4-06
~ 3-57
1-85
3-70
4'93
755 ~
5--72 .
0-89
8 -35:
1.11
-83,16
Total
"Source:
Imports as
perctgnt_age of""
Production
Economic Survey"198~-83
,~
.'
KuRUKSHETR.(
Au~t
\
16. -198,
-.
P"
.-
While - the production has maintained an upward trend; the_facilities- for storage, processing Rna marketing have not kept 'pace -with it. -Proper _ storage
and handling of foodgrains is of utmost _ importance
in .view of the -substantial losses of food arising from,
defective methods of storing the -sanie. The U. -N.
Developm~nt Projects' Action stated thail- in India
over 10 million tonnes of grains are lost each year
through spoilage by pests and moisture, and that these
losses were so stupendous that they could- make up _
for the entire annual world shortage. _
CCORDJ1olG
TOthe Commonwealth Secretariat, it was
estimate'llthat the post-harvest losses vary from 10
to _over 25 percent. _ The storage losses comprise more
then two-third of the total -in most of the countries.
-In general, it is said that 10 to 15 percent of the foodgrains are -lost during _storage in tropical and - subtropical countries. According to a report on 10sse1;of foodgrains in India by Birl;I Institute of Economic Research, at least 10 percent of the foodgrains are
lost every year in'storage alone.
,-
2
----~_._'1970-71
1971-72
1972,73
1973-74
1974-75
1975-76 1976-77
1977-78
1978-79
1979-80
1981l-81
1981-82
10-11
I-
9-81
-9-05
9-77
9.31
11 -29
10-37
-11-79
Total
7 .1~
6 -12
6-38
6.89
6.57
7.96
7 -32
8-32
8-68
7-22 8 -53
8-76
12-31
10.23
12-09
12 -42
207-9
I. 146-7
!
f
The existing system consists of _about 7(l percent foodgrains production being retained at the farm level for domestic consumption and seed purposek and the
balance"which consists of marketable surplus~s, moves, to consuming centres through various Government
agencies as well as private trade channels. The grains
retained-.- at farm level are stored in indigenohsly-made
.
I
storage structures such as K/uUhis, Bukharies, Bharo.
rozaS, etc. which can hardly protect the gfaiI)s from
-_insects, pests androdenlS_ - The stocks procured by
the public agencies are stored in godowns pwned -by
these agencies or hired by them from private parties.
- Similarly stocks purchased by the traders 1"re either
kept in warehouses of public agencies .or in!their ewn
godowns. The grains stored at the farm'level suffer
the !Jlaxirnumlosses.'
-:
I_
How
to
I
avoid loss~s
,
I
..
Total Losses
Losses
@9 .33-% . due to .
IneffiCient storage
@6-58%
2
3_
_7.70
7-72
7 :48
7-52
8-34
6-75
6-92
8'87
8 -'/7 _
. 9 -28
5-39
5-44
5-28
5-30
5-88
4-76
4;86_
6-28
6-18
6.55
1
~ -1960'61
1961-62
1962-61
1963-64
1964-65
_ -1965-66
1966-67
1967'68
1968-69
1969-70
.
. ..
.
I
Since _the 65-70 ,percent of the foodgrains areretained by the farmers; they should be- ttained in
_the' scientific storage practices to enable: them - to
minimise the losses. Government of Iudia has al.
ready launch,d a Save Grain Campaign u~der w~icli .
the trainiug is imparted and demonstraiions artl
given. But 'conSidering'the number of fatmers and
their
spread,
ihe task is so huge
that thd existence
.
,
'r
of a few 'agencies c,annot serve the purpose.
...:Year ...
..
'-
2
Faodgrainsbe procured: from the farmers and stored
by public agencies in scientific storage strUctures.
This system has its in-built limitation because it is
only 30-40 percent of' the foodgraJns praducti~n
which is, the marketable surplus and is disposed off
by 'the farmers immediately after harvest and is
available' far procurement by 'public' agencies. Even
the storage' 'capacity available with' these agencies
is na~sufficient to stock the marketable surplus .of
'the farmers, a"large proponion.of which is concernc.j by the traders and .finds its storage in unscientific
starage structures tao. . .
3
In view 6f high foodgrains losses in on-the-farm-.
storage and 'Drganised sector bypassing the rural
areas, there is an urgent need to create facilities
in rural are.as which .can meet the' economic requirements of the farmers .alld ca'n reduce the unwanted losses too.
mak;
1. It will demonstrate the, utility of scientific storage techniques to' the farmers.
'
2. It will save them from the clutches of the money- '
. lende.rsby extending credit fa,ilities against' hypothe<Oatio~of their stocks. ,
,
.
3. It will ensure farmers to get the benefit of remunerative prices by storing their produce till favourableprices could 'be' obtained ..
4. It will prevent distress' sale of agricultural produce immediately after' harvest when: the prevailing
prices are at their lowest
.
5. It will'reduce pressure on storage space with
existing public agencies.
6. It will reduCe pressure ,on transport facilitiesiri
post-harvest .periods of peak demand for transport.
,
7. This will also make ,available agricultural inputs
required for growing crops ana increasing production.
To make such a system' viable, it is considered as
necessary to assess the ,actual requirement of .the area
:-based on the' existing storage capacity, agricultural
production 'potential; inpU!t ocequirements and other
distribution needs befor~ the creation of such a rural
warehousing facility.
It shonld be manned by an agency-Gram p'auchayat, Cooperative Organisation, Market Committee,
State Warehousing Corporation etc. in whom its clients
have full faith.
''
,
'Farmers must' be educated and motivated regarding
the availability and utility of rural warehousing facili- "
ties through various e-xten~ionand other agencies in
the cOl,mtryconcerned with farmers' welfare.
-..
KURUKsHETRAAu~st
,.
(
16, 1983;
"-
ee
Command area
'developnlent:
achievements and
perspectivy
WATER
the cultivators
in the command
~,
KuiWKSHE'TRA
HE
'
COMMAND
AREA
DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAMME
and;-
broadly
~.
."
4, Introduction of rotational system of water distribution within the outlet command, (warabandi).
3. Adoption of suitable cropping ,pattern and rostering system of irrigation,
4. Strengthening of agricultural elf tension service,.
5. ,Provision of adequate drai;;age network in the
c6ifmand
, tlOn system,' .
0-
'.
URING.THE
P.ERIOD
'"
~~~m
;4. Grant,s
.. ;
KURVKSHETRA
,-
.~
On
"wtching'
OF
State
Field
Channel
Levelling
Andhra Pradesh.
Assam
Bihar
Goa
406.65
4'70
548.94
159 .45
Gujarat
394-17
. 7--45
18.77
'727 .51
0.28
207.59
519.33
59.75
261 '11
54.40
2519.36
12 '12'
1 -45
61'51 '
Haryana
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
KeraIa
Madhya Pradesh
Maharaslitra
Manipur
Orissa
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
'Vest
.'
Bengal
l
-
. + For
Note:
- Warabandi
Fiekf*
dl~ains
116 -24
14 .33
'1'19
30 '28
0'37
1 .66
70 -19
13 -73
10.58
-458.52
0.80 .
29 '15
462 '43 '
55'22
.4'00
24 .88
1 '24
4-00
.13'72
26'02
Land
7.56
2'91
Total,
5742 .13
1279-47
--.,-'-';'ur;p;:;;t~o~D"ece='
m;;;;::be:r;C1;;9;Q8'2.-~---------~--_::::':-=-:':""---~~=::"_---"=-2'."----
(000
40.00
.4 .43
.3.67
6.67
25-63
386 '35
4,66
35 '00,
1.22
101 '50'
348 .36
0'07
417'40
832'42
Lining of
~ /-
2-20
0'04
71'79
1.
12.79
22
2
196 '97 '
. 4 -97
0.51
510.42
I '27
840'52
";J'J'S'2
.
-
'-,
hal t1
KURUKSHETRA
August 16' 1983
.
S'ale/U,r,
CCA
ecA covered
under field-'
Channels in
pe; cen/*
1. Andhra- Pradesh
t463 ,30
28
2. Assam
25,40
18
3. Bihar
2393.64
23
4. Goa
14 ,40 .
5: Gujarat
578.10
6. Haryana
443.87 ,
44'68
42
1362.78
. 5T
13. Orissa
14. Rajasthan
15. Tamil Nadu
16. Uttar Pradesh 17. ~V.:st B,mJ;al
Total: :
60
134,83
805,46
~.25
1203.80
43
24.00
443.zJ
13
1450,00
18
546.22
10
2922.00
86
909' .OJJ
14765.06
.39
Warahand;
'1-
MANAGERS
are responsible tor making
the irrigation water available \0 all potential users
according to. the requirement of crops under the plan-,
. ned cropping schedule. _They have to. ensure tlrat no
potential. user .group (grouped ~ccording.. to land.
situation~ land holding size: or social stratificatio~) is
discriminated aga.inst in_ their, attempt to get 1vater
from the irrigation system. IntrqductioI)- and, e:nf9rc.c~.
.ment of turn scheduling of .water In . the outlet commands wiIi go a long. way in achieving this objective.
RRIGATION
'1: .
'H,
.'"
"
KURtlKSHETRA
.
August
. 16, 1983
~
obtained from the PlaDnmg Commission also corroborate substantial increase in productivity due to the
execution oCt!Je projects.
They. have gone for suitable crops with sound management practices and use of inputs and have started
pre-planning of their agricultural activities in ,.jew of
reliability of water supply.
The continuous emphasis,for enforceme"'t of War~bandi, by the Government of India, .has brought forth
substaritial achievement in its introduction and,enforcement. An area of about 4.17 hikh' hectares ,was
brO~ght under Warabandi during 1982c83,duc to the
efforts made in the 'Productivity Year'
Benefits
could be. assesT sed by folloWingthe'withprogramme
and Without' principles.
HE
BENEFITS'
OF
'One, of. the major objectives of 'irrigation d~velopment . is to see 'that both
inter and, intra-regional
.
.
~.
var,iabilityin productivity is reduced to the minimum.
In other words, the farm management practices should
be s)lch that,the crops most suitable for 'respective
region or sub-region are taken up in such areas. 'ThiS
in tum, will lead to maximization of output per unit
of area. An analysis 'ofthe variability, of intercregional .productivity of crops like .kharif paddy, kharif jowar and,
,wheat, is made by comparing the co-eflicients of variations' in pre-project and .post-project productivity.
~-.
I.
11
20-Point Programme
announced by the
. .
. Prime
. .Minis-
.ter. Irrigation management was to playa very important rQle in increasing the production and productivity
in the. "productivity year" and thereafter. Consistent.
with .the efforts of.the CAD authorities, the achieve" menis under field channels for better utilisation' of
irrigation potential during 1982~83 was 11.33 lakh
hectares as against a target of the 9 Inkh hectares .fixed
by the Planning COInrnission.Similarly . fOr more
equitable distribution and effective utilisation of water,
warabandi was executed in 4.17. laKh hectares of orrea.
As thought by many. CAD J:'rogramme is not an
. engineering solution to the. problem of effective water
'utiliiation. It is a~ integrated approach to effective
water uti1ization through engineering improvements'
and adoption of higher technology through appropriate
organizational restructuring with the involvement of the
'beneficiarycultivators. Inadequate appreciation of the
above had wrongly led many to the belief that CAD
offers an engineering solution to the problem. The confusion, it is felt, a~isesdue to improper identification of
different aspects of the programme at various stages
" of development. . The confusion lies in distinguishinl';
the necessary.conditions from the sufficient conditions.
The construction of field channels and land levelling
and shapi~g are the Decessarycoriditions to supply
water, field'drains, warabandi, extension and organiza" tion required for. effective supply of inputs, marketing
of the products etc. are the sufficient"conditions for
successful implementation of tlie programme.
The benefits of the CAD. Programme will increase
further as the farmers get used. to .the new system
. thi~ugh greater involvement. .It holds out the pnssi_.
bility of a better future through .substantial increase in
agricultural productivity. Since the Indian economy
is sensitive to the agricultural productivity. stability
in its' growth will ensure stability in other sectors of
the
economy.and pave
.
. way for better economic .order.
.
"
",
'12.
--'-__
.:......:_.......;..,_...:.-
-'---J ..'
KURUKSHE'fRA Agust 1'6, 198.3
cSpeciiJC com~nen(p/iln
''for ~checlUledcostes
.
.'.-
.
,
.
VIDYA
RAO
Reader, Deplt. of Social Welfare AdminiStration, T.I.S.s., Bombay
's
CHEDULED
,.CASTE POPULATIO!'i'
constitutes about
15 per cent of the total population in India; of
which 90 per Ce'ntreside in .the rural areas. With a
view to reducing the inequality between them and the
.rest of the population and to bring them on par with
the rest of the population, many S!rdl1'gieshave been
adopted by the Government. They have mainly been
resid\Jai in nature.
.
,
In the absence of special directive to spend a certain
portion of the resources from the general sector prOgrammes, the implementing aut1).oritieshave generally
neglected to identify the scheme that directly benefit the
SCs and to quantify in financial and physic31terms the
.targets for .each of the general sector programmes. They .
have also heen under the ;impression iliat only'special
provisions need to be expended as the SCs are a con-,
stitutionaliy recognized special group.'
Further the
so-called integrated approaches have been little more
than arithmatic total, of the sectoral scheme as far as
the SCs, are concerned. Tpe' tendency of the implementing authoritie~ to concentrate on those S9> who
are ready to avail these benefits have left majority of
the SCs falling below tlie poverty line'without' coverage. ThUs the government's efforts in the 'paSt have
contributed little to the development of the ,weaker
sections amo:ggthe SCs and has only perpetrated new
patterns of inequalities among' the SCs.. Despite. the
sizable expe!lditure for their social and' economia
development, their 'Position has not only ~emained unchanged, but is also not' commensurate with' the
expenditure.
HAS THEREFORE,
been a seaoch' for alterTHERE
'native approach
to ensure adequate flow of
(1)
-.
1983
To reduce stigma anq/or' segregation, the programmes for promoting the welfare of .tbe SCs are universalIzed. That is, every department and every sector
. within the divisible' pool of d~velopmcnt programme
is requiTed to set apart a certain portion' of funds
from their normal budgets specifically for the SCs. In
this way, ''liO additional fnnds are required. The
diversion of these funds for other weaker sections 'Or
purposes is disallowed and these' funds are non-IapsabIe; iil the sense, the unspent ~alance can
carried
be
13
TheSCP was introduced in 1979-80 by the Government of India with a' View to reaching at least 50
. , percent of the SCs falling beneath the poverty, line.
For this, the SCP espouses a sectoral and targetgroup approaches' in combinatjon. Within each of
'the sectors, resources and benefits are guaranteed in
finanl:ial and physical terms. Among the SCs, the
landless labourers, rural artisans, marginalismali farmers, the educated unemployed youtb, the handicap. ped and others failling below the poverty
line
are to receive pre(erential.- treatIr!ent over 'the rest.
Those programmes which lend themselves to quantification and the labour intensive programmes in the
. Social and Community 'Services, Agriculture and Allied services, Water and Power Development and
Transport and Communication sectors ;"e given hig-, '
her illlocations so that the' benefits can directly reach
the target groups. In this' manner, while being in-'
elusive of the SCs as a group, the SCP is sele.etive of
the' poorer 'Ieft~outs among the SCs.
The SCP clearly identifies and a~'sesses the sociocultural barriers to change and development, the spe, cial' needs of the poorer among the SCs, ,and their"
orgaiiisational potential. It is a preventive 'step in
tliat it aspires to prevent cornering of beoefits by the
beher-off among the SCs, to prevent further ,ieduc- , tion in the starus of the poorer SCs and any serious
social disruption that may arise out of their feeling
of deprivation.
'
the SCP is' no mdre than a .program1.. me ,of monitoring and' coordination of sectoral .
programmes within the govef!}ment departments Since
the SCP is a c""scious effort to ensure that the
SCs get their fair, share, the 'Outlays are carved out
of the diovisablepool of the developmen't budg~t. The
responsibility. of implementing these schemes will be
shared' by the central, state and local governments ..
In addition, specific autonomous bodies like the Back- ,
waru Class Development Corporations
have. also
PRACTICE,
b"een identified to carry out these programmes. P~ogrammes of economic assistance, educational opporrunities, housing, health and 'other s-"cial services are
being extended to the SCs. SCP provides basic guidelines to identify the sectors and the schemes 'for making the resources available. The ,administrative setup has. been designed to monitor and coordinate the
implementation of the 'welfare, programmes for ,the
SCs. However;' much freedom for _operationalizing the
SCP has been, provided to the state governments ..
High Power Steering Communities at the ministerial
level in the state, SCP cells at the secretariat, divisio"ualand' district levels have been set up in the
states to bring about functional. co-ordination among
the different tiers so'that right quantity of sources arc
made available at the right time and place. But the
membership 'composition of these coordinating bodies,
has been, left to the' stales and there are considerable
variations. It is not clear how the non-officials have
been given the opportunity, to represent the' interests
of the SCs and. to participate in the SCPo , In some
states, the . social welfare committee of the Zilla
'.Parishad has been considered as the SCP cell at the
'district level. The powers and procedures for control
'and accountab,lity of these cells are ambiguous at
present.
monitoring side! a district officer, preferably
a social welfare officer (Class I) under the leadership of the collector has been entrusted with the work.
He is, in charge of collecting 'progress' reports from
different departments periodically and preparing a
consolidated report to be sent to tbe SCP Divisional
Cell for necessary action. Coordinathn and rational
alignment of various departmental programmes in the
district entails, a complex and elab0.rate process. co.ordination would be impossible- without monitoring
inf<Jrmation on the progress made. Hence, ,monitoring is a crucial function. It' is therefore, imperative .
that appropriate responsibili1ies with sufficient powers
be dilineated at this level. Specific ruJes and prO-:'
cedures .for 'control and accountability should be
, clearly spelled out. Crucial, as ,it is, even under the
leadership of the collector, it is doubtful if the distri'Cl
level officer enjoys sufficient status and auihority required for tlce job.
'.
N THE
'
'.~
14
KURUKSHETRA
.Indebtedness
\
..
To
among.tribals:
a study
'-
'.
FAHIMUDDIN
.
Giri Institute of De\'elopmcnt Studi~, Lucknow (D. P.)
Methodology
mHEm;IRU'
IE._.
--------
__
:!J
1.' away
il~
Objectives. of the"study
_T., as under:'
HE MAIN OBJpCTIVES
1
To estimate the extent, and distribution of credit.
in different,farm size groups.'
2
,
.Findings of the_study
Pattern of Illdebiedlless.-The .extent and distribu.
tion" of. credit shows 'that magnitude 'oi iridebtedness . is very high in tribal econoniy as ~ixty
per cent of the total' households. arc under
debt.
The position of
landless
agricultural
labourers,' margina! 'lUld sinall farmers is very dismal
"as lipto 66.67 per cent of their households are under
'deht. . The percentage. of indebted medium and large
"farm size .households are lesser but the. average
amount. ofdeot.
per indebted. h':lUsehold and per,'
.
/
. 1'5 '
Farm
Size Group
Total'
No. of
Total No.
of indebted
ilOuseholds
households
P.ercentage
Average AmOllil! of I!-ebt (M
of households ~----'------.under debt-'
Per inaebted . Per househoUsehold -
-S
71 -43
520 ,00
..
66.67
1000 .00
. 666.67
60 '00'
1368.00
. '8:1.0.80
14
57 ,14
2668'75
1525110
'7880 '00
4p7-18
3695'13
2217 .08
Landless
1 ba.)
Marginal (upto
Smitll (1-~
ba.)
Medium (2-10
ha.)
hold
371 .43
,.
!Mge (10,ha.
and above)
TOTAL
18
10
55,56
50
30
.. 60 110
jllStitutions
institution
1..Landless
2. Marginal
3. Small
4. MediunI
5. Large,
100.00
55.00
48;73
45.00
51 :27
89.93
10 -Q7
- 12,70
.87 .30
"
TOTAL
17 ,10.
82 :90'
.
.
.16
'
'
Nature of Borrowings.'-The
households borrow
, the money for different 'expenditure which ,is iudicative Q! !J:teir potential.for repaylllent. The purpose of .
the loans. across different households has been exa- l
mined' in tIle following. tables :
,i
.' KURUKSHETRA
--B-u-s-ill-is'-s- -C-o-n,-u-m-p-Uo-n---.r.-o/-o/-
1. Landless
(i)
(ii)
-.
Bank
Non-bank
2600
2600
2200
1800
2200
2000
2104
2000
2110
19200
2150 '
2., Marginal
"(i)
(ii)
Bank
Non-bank
-,
:
3. Small
(i)
-Oi)
Bank'
Non-bank
4. Medium
(i)
(ii)
Bank
Non-bank
19200
Bank
Non~bank
68792
6000,'
Bank,
91896
, 5. Large
(i)
Oi)
400'8,
I
TOTAL
,(i)
(ii)
Non-bank
68792
10008
91896
6000.
12958
18958
Period of de/aulll
Two years
One year
and I~s
"
l
"
1.
2.
3.
4.
Landless
Marginal
Small
Medium
37.50
22.22
5. __La_r_ T_O,O_T_A_L_'
__
50.00 '
100.00
3'7 .50
33.33
19'23
~~
42,30
'Three'
years and
. above
, 100 .00
- 50.00
25'00
44 '45
__
,~ ,'38-47
Conclusion
,HE STl)DY
REVEALS
the high dimension of in'
" debtedness iri tribal economy as majority Of'the.
households are under debt. The average amount ,of
..debt ,per household and' ,per indebted hOusehold is
RS.,22'1-7.08 and Rs. 3695.13 respectivelv., The
indebtedness of the household is inversely related with
the sire of land holdings while the flow of credit is
.pc'sitively related with farm size. Consequently the
majOrity of' the households of Iandl~ss' agricultural
'labourers, marginal and smali farmers are tinder
,debt. The result showed that the institutional 'ageli.'
cies have changed the character of tI,e rural credit
market even in iribal economy but the revamped
institutional facilities have not made considerableheadway in the process of meeting the credit, require- .
.ments of the rural poor. Major. benefits have gone
a. small
REFERENCES
.' 1. For details see, Swamy, Dilip S., "I:aJldand Credit Reform..~in India", Part Two,
-.
/.
4. Mishra,"G.P., in "DynamICS of Rural Development in Village India", Ashish Publishi':lgHouse .New Delhi, 1982,~. 49.
,'
bi-
to be governed
ihe status enjoyed by these depart~
ments' on' the basis of their size, characteristics of
. their functions, their employees,. the: number and types
of Clients served, and the prestige they enjoy in the
community. Ther'efore, the system of organiZlltional '
stratification needs to be wel,l developed on the basis
of the consensus .. In the absence of that, the depart
.monts which enjoy high prestige .will Fe more evasive
and will not comply with the requir<i,rnentsof >,oordination. On the, other hand, entrusting the responsibility. either on rotation basi~ o~ 'on some other eri-,
tena to the individuals/departments will perhaps
be more effective. A, mere district ,functionary .in
this sense enjoys lowprestioge and may not be effective due to no fault of his.
.
,A word of caution
.
T
.'
,.
HE SCP
REFERENCES
. Government of India:
1978-1979
Government of .
, Maharashtra
-,
Murdia, R.
"
Report . of
the
Commission.
for. . Scheduled
Castesand
Scheduled 'Tribes ..
Revised Draft-Special
Compo .
nent
Plan
for'
Sche4ulcd
Castes _ and ~ Neo-BuddhistsSixth Five -Year Plall 1980-85
and Annual PI(ln 1981-82,
.
'
Problems of
Coordination
in
Panchayati Raj, Indian. Journal
of Social Work, 'Vol. ~VI,
.No. 2, pp, 75.86
,.
This feature is based all success stories viz. achievemellts gailled ill varioU3
. spheres of rural developlllellt by farmers, institutinns, experimenters and individuals. There is hardly an . argument over the fact that dedication and zeal to
put in hard work can achieve anything. And olle achievement impires and shaw~
Iheway to others/.
'...
. .
.
.
. 11. -
,.
'.
.
We hope our esteemed readers will send' us their. own experi~nces iii the
field so that" others can benefit by them to. usher in a better '/ife for our rural
people. (EDITOR)
... ...
. ,
20-pt.programme
I'
1 II-
"
."
\
villagp.
One fine morning a year ago, Kallappa was surprised t.o see a' white-eollared babu coming to his door~
steps. The stranger ~ked so many questionS about
,... \
20
r .
(
'\
,
. Balakrishnan of Katpadiis .a shiDing ex~mple of
the emerging. new farmer in the afea. He used to ..
grow rainfed paddy and sugar-cane in his little farm. '
Vagaries of the weather stood in ihe way of steady
farining. He decided to try something new.
up.
. AT
,
the initiative of. the Prime Minister,' the Gov.. ernment have 'launched during 1983-84:' a
,mass,,,e programine for assisting the small and marginalfarmers for increasing agricultural production.
This: is the biggest .single project ever taken up, involvmg a total' outlay of Rs. 150 crores in one year
to '1;Jeshared equally by the Centre and State.Governments. The allocation for each block is Rs. 5 lakhs
to be"'given as 'subsidies, on tl,e LR,D. 'pattern, on
wells and, pump-sets (Rs. 3,50 lakhs), plantation of
fuel and fruit trees (Rs. 0.5 lakhs), anll free distribution of minikits of seeds and fertilizers for pulses and'
oilse<:dsand for land development (Rs, Lo lakh)-,
States have shown encouraging n;sponse to this programme, I;letailed guidelines for its implementation
h'lve already been sent to the State Governments.'
Releases 'of funds for the first quarter' of the current
financial year amounting'to Rs. 30,14 crores, have'
been made to 17 States and 6 Union Territories who
have concurred in the implementation of this programme,
Kuppuswamy of Machnur village'was another beneficiary of a loan from the Indian Bank along with an
IRDP subsidy. He' dug an irrigation well and bought
,bullocks' with the money. Even th!J.ughKuppmr.vamy
}8- rio more, his family is thriving as their two acre,
irrigated farm 'is now a regular source, of .income:.
In Machnur villages' the bank financed
., under the
IRDP, 50, farmers ,to organize themselves into a' milk
producers'; co-operative society. Milch animals were
provided by the bank. The society proved to be. a
success. It could repay the loan' and yet distribute
handsome 'profits and bonus.
,
,
-Farm
.f
Progress, Modern
'-
.
.
"
'.'
.,
******'************~******************
; :
,;'
. " .
" .,*
is' .'.
~.~
SELECTED
~.
~
.*
*
..
*'
'**'
**
*.~*
"""
~~R=m
Rs 700 . Tp~!e'ks 10/. for each edo)
MAHAT\IlAGANvm:
1HE COLLl!C1'I;:DWORKS
A Great.Life In Brief
OF MAHA1MAGANDHI.
by Vincent Sheean
Rs 12.00
.,
ROMAINROLLAND .
85 Volumes In English
ANDGANDm
Con<.essional.set.pnceDel;'"", RS.1700.00
CORRESPONDENCE'
R.. 2500
Paperback Rs 136000
A mOUGBTf'OR 1HE DAY
75 Volumesin Hihdl
by MK Gandhi
Rs. 60.00' Cancessional set price'
Rs 600.(lO
;I:
'>s.f'
.'*
;I:
<
GANOHJAN UTERAnJRE
TIlER
,'
FOB
:It<'
;I:
*~~
.
**
*
.
'
.,
i*' . .....
~ '..';
*.**
BUSINESS MANAGER
. ,AFBEE COpy OF
DETAIl.ED'CATALOGVE
~*
"""
. ~,
"""
. :It<'
"""
:=~8AGES
ALSO AVAILABLE.
"
I,ASK
I.'
"""
*.
~,
davp 82/579
~
.
*S . "'. . .
..
'. . ,
********~****.***************~*.*
.22
/I/<.
,'>U
KURUKSHETR;\
**
MAHA~ by D.G.Tendulkat
.. TIlE GANDHI STORY
A set in 8 Volumes Deluxe Rs 100.00 by Sawanl & Badalkar
Rs 10.00'
PapeTback R. 7500
(in colour)
GANDm, A P1Cl6r1a1
(AlsoavailableIn Hindi,
by'B.R 'Nanda
. R. 1600 .Marathi.GujaraU.Punjabl,TamiL..
Kannada. Malayalam,and
"""
.~
"""Biography
,~
GANDHI
BOOKS
ON .
.*
-s*'
/~
August 16,1983'
.(
u'ral
women
The daily routine
of most of the
rural women is
quite tough and
includes working
in
the
fields
besides
doing
household chores.
(Li censed under U (DN)-54 to post without prepayment at Civil Lines Post Office, Delhi).
.
r
A smlll
family .is fasf b~co~in.ga "popular norm. in the, rural areas of ,tile coUntry ..
Rural WOlnen
.
The Sixth
Plan
pledges
of
Women
The main
emphasis in Sixth Plan will remain. to be on the economic upliftment of rural women through.'
greater opportlmities for .self and more employment. For this purpose three-fold strategy should
be adopted
consistilig
skills for at
ment
ventures
education
reasonable
their products .
. .
,'.T .
".
PUBLISHED
BY .'>THE~~,DiRECTOR,
AND ....PRINTED
BUSINESS
'BY
MANAGER:
PUBLICATImi~~ DIVISION,
:rHt'....-MA.NAGERJ
L.
R.
BATRA
GOVERNMENT
ASST.
OF
NEW -: DELID-llOOOl,
INDIA
DIRECTOR
PRESS,
(p) : K.
R.
FARIDABAD
KRISHNAN
d
~..