Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KH4444
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
1.1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
INTRODUCTION cont..
1.2
Basic purpose to remove sound rock from face via blast, then use
crushers, pulverizers, screening to separate into diff. size
Desirable to produce cube shaped not flat or elongated
Operation : remove overburden >> blast (danger) >> transport via
truck to feeder >> grizzly (waste <1) >> jaw >> screen (stockpile) >>
cone >> screen
Primary crusher reduce blasted rock to max size ranging from 8 - 1
Secondary & tertiary reduce to desired size
1.3
AGGREGATE PROPERTIES
1.4
Classification by size:
1. Coarse Aggregate
Retained on 4.75 mm (No. 4)
Retained on 2.38 mm (No. 8)
Retained on 2.00 mm (No. 10)
ASTM D692
Asphalt Institute
HMA Book
2. Fine Aggregate
Passing on 4.75 mm (No. 4)
Passing on 2.38 mm (No. 8)
ASTM D1073
Asphalt Institute
3. Mineral Filler
At least 70% passed 75 m
ASTM D242
10
11
12
14
15
17
1.4.6 Gradation
18
19
Sieve Analysis
20
Aggregate Blending
21
Questions?
22
Igneous Rock
23
Sedimentary Rock
24
Metamorphic Rock
25
26
27
Blasting
28
Impact (F3-2)
29
30
31
32
Excavation
33
Excavation
34
Excavation
35
Excavation
36
Crushing
37
Crushing
Partially Crushed
River Gravel
River Gravel
Crushed Rock
38
Land Transportation
39
Rail Transportation
40
Barge / Water
Transportation
41
Sizing
42
Stockpiling
* Prevent segregation and contamination
* Good stockpiling = uniform gradations
-
43
Stockpiling
44
45
46
Splitter
47
48
Test
Malaysian Requirement
Soundness
AASHTO T104
MS-30
Polishing resistance
MS-30
PSV > 40
Stripping resistance
AASHTO T182
SG and WA
MS-30
WA < 2%
BS 1377
Cleanliness &
deleterious material
BS 1377
Toughness
* Aggregate Crushing Value (MS 30: Part 8: 1995)
Relative measure of the resistance of an aggregate to
crushing under a gradually applied compressive load
Test specimen compacted into steel cylinder
subjected to load applied tru plunger.
Degree of crushing assessed by sieving test and
taken as a measure of aggregate crushing value
(ACV)
50
ACV
51
Abrasion Resistance
* Los Angeles Abrasion (AASHTO T96, ASTM C131):
Resistance of coarse agg to abrasion and
mechanical degradation during handling,
construction and use
* Aggregate at standard gradation subjected to
damage by rolling with prescribed number of steel
balls in large drum for a given number of rotations
* Result expressed as % changes in original weight
52
LA Abrasion Test
Soundness
(AASHTO T 104)
54
Soundness
Before
After
55
56
(MS 30)
57
Clay Content
(Sand Equivalent Test)
* ASHTO T176, ASTM D2419
Sand Reading
x 100
Clay Reading
Flocculating
Solution
Clay Reading
Sand
Reading
Suspended
Clay
Sedimented
Aggregate
58
Measurement Rod
59
60
Plasticity Index
ASTM D4318
62
Specific Gravity, G
Ratio of the mass to volume of an
object to that of water at the same
temperature
Mass Solid
Volume
G=
Mass Water
Volume
63
Densities
Density is the unit weight of a material
lb/ft3 or kg/m3
Unit weight = g w G
gw = 1.000 g/cm3
gw = 62.4 lb/ft3
gw = 1000 kg/m3
Gsb =
66
Gs, eff =
Surface Voids
Solid Agg.
Particle
Vap
Vpp - Vap
Water
permeable
pores
Gsa = Ws / (Vs x gw )
Vs
Aggregate
Solids
68
69
ASTM C127
1. Dry aggregate
2. Soak in water for 24 hours
3. Decant water
4. Use pre-dampened towel to get SSD
condition
5. Determine mass of SSD aggregate
6. Determine mass under water
7. Dry to constant mass
8. Determine oven dry mass
70
71
72
Gsa = A / (A - C)
Water absorption, %
Absorption % = [(B - A) / A] * 100
73
ASTM C128
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Dry aggregate
Soak in water for 24 hours
Spread out and dry to SSD
Add 500 g of SSD aggregate to pycnometer of known
volume
Pre-filled with some water
Add more water and agitate until air bubble have been
removed
Fill to line and determine the mass of the pycnometer,
aggregate and water
Empty aggregate into pan and dry to constant mass
Determine oven dry mass
74
75
76
77
Gsa = A / (B + A - C)
Water absorption, %
Absorption % = [(D - A) / A] * 100
78
Types of Gradations
1. Well graded (dense)
Good interlock
Low permeability
3. Gap graded
Aggregate Gradations
100
90
80
70
Gap-graded
60
(open)
50
Uniformly graded
40
(single-size)
30
20
Well-graded
10
(dense)
0
0.01
0.1
10
100
80
Aggregate Gradation
Use 0.45 Power Gradation Chart
Blend Size Definitions
maximum size
nominal maximum size
Gradation Limits
control points
restricted zone
81
Example:
40
20
0
0
80
max
size
60
40
20
0
0 .075 .3 .6 1.18 2.36
4.75
9.5 12.5
19.0
100
99
89
72
65
48
36
22
15
9
4
84
Gradations Considerations
Considerations:
Expected Problems
86
Permissible Variation
(% by weight of total mix)
Bitumen
0.2 %
5.0 %
4.0 %
3.0 %
2.0 %
87
Restricted Zone
Percent Passing
100
max density line
restricted zone
control point
.075
.3
2.36
4.75
9.5
nom
max
size
max
size
12.5
19.0
.075 .3
2.36
12.5
19.0
Max Size
(mm)
50
37.5
25
19
12.5
90
Target Gradation
Acceptable gradation band specified
Mix design selects a job mix formula (JMF) which falls
within band and meets design criteria
Superpave
5 nominal sizes (37.5, 25, 19, 12.5, and 9.5 mm)
Four sieve sizes used to set upper and lower limits
Staying out of the restricted zone in suggested to minimize
problems with natural sands
91
Washed Sieve
93
Mechanical Sieve
Individual Sieve
Stack of Sieves
94
Mechanical Sieve
Stack in
Mechanical
Shaker
95
Blending Stockpiles
Basic formula for combining stockpiles to
achieve a target gradation is:
p = Aa + Bb + Cc + .
where:
p
96
Blending Stockpiles
1. Plot individual gradations
2. Plot specification limits
3. Can be used for initial assessment
Can blend be made from available
materials?
Identification of critical sieves
Estimate trial proportions
Percent Passing, %
100
90
Gradation B
80
70
60
50
Gradation A
40
30
20
10
0
0.075 0.3
1 .18
4.75
9.5
12.5
19
Sieve Size, mm
98
Gradation B
Gradation A
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.075 0.3
1 .18
4.75
9.5
12.5
19
Sieve Size, mm
99
100
90
80
70
60
Gradation B
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.075 0.3
1 .18
4.75
9.5
12.5
19
Sieve Size, mm
100
Blending of Aggregates
Material
Agg. A
Agg. B
Blend Target
% Used
U.S. Sieve
%
Passing
3/8
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
100
90
30
7
3
1
0
100
100
100
88
47
32
24
No. 200
10
%
Batch
%
Passing
%
Batch
102
Blending of Aggregates
Material
Agg. A
Agg. B
% Used
50 %
50 %
U.S. Sieve
%
Passing
%
Batch
%
Passing
3/8
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
100
90
30
7
3
1
0
50
45
15
3.5
1.5
0.5
0
100
100
100
88
47
32
24
No. 200
First Try
(remember trial & error)
Blend Target
%
Batch
100 * 0.5 = 50
90 * 0.5 = 45
30 * 0.5 = 15
7 * 0.5 = 3.5
3 * 0.5 = 1.5
1 * 0.5 = 0.5
0 * 0.5 = 0
10 0
* 0.5 = 0
100
80 - 100
65 - 100
40 - 80
20 - 65
7 - 40
3 - 20
2 - 10
103
Blending of Aggregates
Material
Agg. A
Agg. B
% Used
50 %
50 %
U.S. Sieve
%
Passing
%
Batch
3/8
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
100
90
30
7
3
1
0
50
45
15
3.5
1.5
0.5
0
No. 200
%
Passing
Blend Target
%
Batch
100
50
100
50
Lets Try
100
50
and get
88
44
a little closer
47the middle
23.5of
to
32target values.
16
the
24
12
10
100
95
65
47.5
25
16.5
12
100
80 - 100
65 - 100
40 - 80
20 - 65
7 - 40
3 - 20
2 - 10
104
Blending of Aggregates
Material
Agg. A
Agg. B
% Used
30 %
70 %
Blend Target
U.S. Sieve
%
Passing
%
Batch
%
Passing
%
Batch
3/8
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
100
90
30
7
3
1
0
30
27
9
2.1
0.9
0.3
0
100
100
100
88
47
32
24
70
70
70
61.6
32.9
22.4
16.8
100
97
79
63.7
33.8
22.7
16.8
100
80 - 100
65 - 100
40 - 80
20 - 65
7 - 40
3 - 20
No. 200
10
2 - 10
105
P1
G1
P2 + . Pn
G2
Gn
106