Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Recently, in restorative dentistry, more emphasize is
being given to gingival perspective for harmonizing
esthetics along with function. Mimicking the gingival
silhouette as the adjacent teeth in any restorative
procedure exhibits an excellent treatment outcome.[1]
The gingival perspective depends on gingival complex,
tooth morphology, contact points, hard and soft tissue
Department of Prosthodontics, Including Crown and Bridge,
A.B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, India
Address for correspondence: Dr.Sonali Shetty,
Prosthodontist, Famdent Clinic, Andheri West, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Email:sonaliscorpio@yahoo.com
Website:
www.jdionline.org
DOI:
10.4103/0974-6781.118888
116
Objectives
Exclusion criteria
RESULTS
1. Frequency distribution of different biotypes among
male and female-Among the male population, thicker
gingival biotype was observed to be more prevalent
with score 1(63%) while compared to thin form(37%).
Among the female subjects, higher prevalence of
thin biotype was found with a score0(59%) when
compared to males(41%)[Graph1]
2. Prevalence of varying central incisors(Crown
width/Length ratio) among different gender: The
frequency distribution of male population was
125 while female was 75 among the 200 subjects
participating. The male population had a ratio of 0.79
and 0.80 of the right and left central incisors resp.
117
DISCUSSION
Demands for an excellent esthetic outcomes requires
the establishment of periodontium and its compatibility
with the surrounding hard and soft tissues. Various
factors influence the position and form of gingival tissue
around the natural tooth or fixed prosthesis. The gingival
biotype plays an important role in harmonizing the ideal
esthetics for any restorative procedure. The objective of
the present survey was to evaluate the prevalence of the
different gingival tissue biotypes in individuals with
varying forms of upper central incisors. The survey was
carried on 200 subjects divided into two age groups.
The method of assessment of gingival biotype ranges
from assessment with periodontal probe, or visual
examination, ultrasonic devices or radiographic
methods. The use of the periodontal probe for
penetration within the sulcus was carried out in this
study. Kanetal.,[13] in their study concluded that the
Journal of Dental Implants | Jul - Dec 2013 | Vol 3 | Issue 2
5LJKW&,
/HIW&,
0DOHV
7KLQELRW\SHVFRUH
)HPDOHV
7KLFNELRW\SH
7KLQELRW\SH
0DOHV )HPDOHV
7KLQELRW\SH
7KLFNELRW\SHVFRUH
)UHTXHQF\GLVWULEXWLRQ
+HLJKWZLGWKUDWLR
\HDUV
\HDUV
6KRUWZLGH&,
/RQJQDUURZ&,
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
13.
10.
11.
12.
14.
15.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of the present survey, following
conclusions were drawn:
1. The thicker gingival biotype is associated with short,
120
16.
17.
121
Copyright of Journal of Dental Implants is the property of Medknow Publications & Media
Pvt. Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv
without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.