Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes
Surveillance is deterring foreign students from entering the US, and theres two
ways to solve this
1) There is a generic solvency advocate that is like, the USFG should substantially
curtail surveillance on foreign students in the US. The solvency evidence for that is
very generic.
2) A more specific solvency mechanism would be to curtail SEVIS. SEVIS is a
surveillance program and it stands for Student and Exchange Visitor Information
System. SEVIS is a computerized system that surveils foreign students in US. The
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) implements SEVIS.
***Case***
Plan
The United States Federal Government should repeal the
Student & Exchange Visitor Information System.
1AC
Innovation
Advantage One: Innovation
Current surveillance policy deters international students from
coming to the United States
Ciment and Radzilowski 15, James Ciment, highly experienced writer, editor, producer, and
publisher of print books, ebooks, databases, and digital content with an extensive list of critically acclaimed
publications., John Radzilowski, history teacher, American Immigration: An Encyclopedia of Political, Social, and
Cultural Exchange, Routledge, Mar 17, 2015
Government actions after the 9/11 attacks had a negative impact on those living in
the United States as immigrants or noncitizens. During the first year after 9/11. the expanded
definitions of "terrorist" and -immigrant" under the USA PATRIOT Act created new restrictions on student visas.
As a
result, the United States became less attractive to international students, which, in
turn, had a bearing on the U.S. labor market, higher education system, and
economy, as persons who might have contributed needed skills and talents to the
U.S. economy and education system were either denied entry or became too
discouraged to apply for entry . The Office of the Attorney General stripped the
Board of Immigration Appeals (a part of the Department of Justice) of its power, rendering
review of immigration cases essentially nonexistent and immigration judges
obsolete. Similarly, the US. Supreme Courts review of the anti-immigration laws of
1996 came to a halt, and stronger enforcement of those laws became a central
focus of the DHS. Muslim, Arab, and Middle Eastern immigrants were severely
affected by these immigration policy changes after 9/11. The federal government
detained and interviewed hundreds of Middle Eastern men based on their
immigration status and country of origin. Post-9/11 immigration policies were aimed
at maintaining strict vigilance with regard to immigration-both legal and illegal -to
the United States. Of the estimated 12 million undocumented foreign nationals residing
in the United States in 2012, a majority are of Latin American descent. Since 9/11,
they have been subject to enhanced enforcement of immigration laws, including
workplace raids, detention, and, for those who have overstayed their visas,
deportation for minor visa violations.
Foreign matriculation at American universities declined alter 9/11, as students had difficulty obtaining visas.
Trilokekar 15,
Roopa Desai Trilokekar, has worked in the U.S., India and Canada in various capacities
facilitating international academic exchanges, FROM SOFT POWER TO ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY? A Comparison Of
The Changing Rationales And Roles Of The U. S. And Canadian Federal Governments In International Education,
CSHE, 2/9/15,
http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/shared/publications/docs/ROPS.CSHE_.2.15.DesaiTrilokekar.SoftPowe
rEconDeplomacy.2.9.2015.pdf
This presidential level support for IE , even if mostly rhetorical, was dramatically challenged
with the catastrophic events of September 11, 2001. With 9/11, IE posed a risk to the nations
security. Recoiling back to restrictive immigration policy processes initiated as a
response to the Iranian crisis and the world trade center bombings, a new tracking
system for international students was introduced by the Bush (Jr.) administration (2001-9). The
passage of the US Patriot Act, the Enhance Border Security Act, the Homeland
Security Act, and the Visa Entry Reform Act facilitated the federal governments
restrictive immigration policies and the implementation in 2003 of the controversial
Student and Exchange Visitors Information System (SEVIS), administered by the new Department of Homeland
Security (operations were still DS responsibility).83 As Witt states, the entire landscape of
international education in the US shifted dramatically from a posture of
recruitment to one of determent , from receptive to suspicious, from
hospitable to hostile .84 The global war on terrorism replaced the cold war as
the national security meta narrative.85 This was a time of crisis in IE with the
U.S. experiencing its first substantial drop in foreign students for the first
time in over 30 years. Such a drop was not experienced even during the cold
war. This drop severely impacted U.S. universities who were both dependent
on foreign graduate students for advanced research in the STEM fields as well as on
revenues from international student fees. The advocacy groups urged the
government to strike an appropriate balance between the conflicting demands of
strengthening homeland security and maintaining openness to the world. 86
International programs, they suggested were an investment in the nations security . Powerful
industrialists/business figures like Bill Gates supported the need for America to
welcome foreign students to strengthen its innovation capacity and global
competitiveness. Both national security and global economic competition were
identified as important rationales and the secure borders, open doors campaign
came to dominate the IE policy discourse. I E faced a uniquely challenging and
paradoxical environment 87 because there was bipartisan political support for IE and in spite of the
federal perspective of IE as a risk to national security, in May 2002, the Bush administration announced legislation
to significantly increase funding for exchange programs. The Cultural Bridges Act of 2002 authorized $95
million/year from 2003-7 for new and expanded IE programs with the Islamic world. As Campbell cogently states,
mutual understanding ha[d] come back into the [federal] frame but with a harder edge, lined primarily with the
notion of global competence and Americas need to CSHE Research & Occasional Paper Series TRILOKEKAR: From
Soft Power to Economic Diplomacy 9 communicate and relate in a multi-cultural globalized, political and economic
Capitalizing on the why do they hate us? sentiment 89, a spotlight was
created on the need and role of public diplomacy in fighting terrorism. Karen Hughes as
environment.88
the new Under Secretary of State for public diplomacy became one of the most visible advocate[s] for exchanges
supporting a budget of $430 million (from $74 million) in 2006 for the DS public diplomacy initiatives. Described as
a period of public diplomacy renaissance 90 it was reminiscent of the Reagan administration support for
exchanges. Powerful dignitaries such as Secretary of States, Colin Powell and Condoleza Rice spoke of IE as the
governments soft power tool. Several new initiatives and policy priorities developed during this current era; public
diplomacy, an investment in academic exchanges, particularly with the Islamic world, investment in study abroad
for American students (2005 Commission on Abraham Lincoln Study Abroad Fellowship Program and the Senator
Paul Simon Study Abroad Foundation Act) and concern with improving the market share of international students
(2009, government accountability office (GAO) study on challenges and best practices in attracting IS to the US).
Perhaps, most importantly, the critical need for a national IE strategy was
supported by the joint policy document issued by the A lliance for
International Education and Cultural Exchange and NAFSA. 91
report from the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) argues . It will come as no
surprise to observers of graduate education that the report documents the fact that foreign students make
up the majority of enrollments in U.S. graduate programs in many STEM fields,
accounting for 70.3 percent of all full-time graduate students in electrical
engineering, 63.2 percent in computer science, 60.4 percent in industrial
engineering, and more than 50 percent in chemical, materials and mechanical
engineering, as well as in economics (a non-STEM field). However, the report, which analyzes National Science
Foundation enrollment data from 2010 by field and institution, also shows that these striking averages mask even
36 graduate programs in
electrical engineering where the proportion of international students exceeds 80
percent, including seven where it exceeds 90. (The analysis is limited to those programs with at
higher proportions at many individual universities. For example, there are
least 30 full-time students.)International students help many universities have enough graduate students to
support research programs that help attract top faculty and that also thereby help U.S. students by having a higherquality program than they otherwise would have, said Stuart Anderson, NFAPs executive director and author of the
report.
society within the U.S. in terms of trying to push for more interest in STEM fields, said Jonathan Bredow, professor
and chair of the electrical engineering department at the University of Texas at Arlington, a program with more than
90 percent international enrollment. Domestic
At
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the proportion of international students
in graduate electrical engineering programs is 52.5 percent and, in computer
science, 35.3 percent. At Stanford, 56 percent of graduate electrical engineering students and 43.7 percent
of graduate computer science students are international. The report also emphasizes the value that
international students can bring to the U.S. economy after graduation as
researchers and entrepreneurs. Measures that would make it easier for STEM
graduate students to obtain visas to work in the U.S. after graduation measures
that many in higher education see as crucial to the U.S. maintaining its edge in
attracting international graduate students -- are pending in Congress (and are included in the
students,' but by definition there are only a few of those schools. Obviously everyone cant be MIT or Stanford."
comprehensive immigration bill recently passed by the Senate). "This report is very well-timed, said Julia Kent,
director of communications and advancement for the Council of Graduate Schools. Obviously, for the policy
reasons -- the pending legislation about STEM visas -- and second because there is data out there right now which
we have some cause for concern in this country about the flow of
international graduate students to the United States which we have always counted
on. There is now more competition for international graduate students . Other countries are
suggests that
developing policies to promote the influx of foreign students to their shores, and there are also ways in which the
current economy in the United States has reduced funding support for graduate students, which makes it more
difficult to attract students to U.S. programs with attractive funding packages. CGS data on applications to U.S.
graduate schools released in April show that total international applications grew by a meager 1 percent this year
and that there were actually drops in applications from certain key sending countries, including China (-5 percent),
South Korea (-13 percent) and Taiwan (-13 percent). On the plus side, applications from India increased 20 percent.
"It's too soon to know how this data will actually affect enrollments, but the preliminary data show that there is
some cause for concern, Kent said.
happened, they were responding to a report from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), which has since been soundly
refuted. This time, it's an article in IEEE's Spectrum Magazine by Robert Charette, who proclaims that "the STEM
Like EPI, Charette is simply wrong. Charette suggests that people who
have a STEM background are down on their luck -- unable to find stable jobs,
making do with flat wages, or bailing out of STEM entirely . The STEM shortage "myth," he
crisis is a myth."
writes, was manufactured by a cabal of special interests who "cherry pick" data to keep themselves in business and
Yet Charette does a fair bit of cherry picking himself while missing
the big picture. He argues from anecdotes and a handful of studies that support his
point but leaves aside the mountain of data that demonstrate a shortage. More
important, he unwittingly points to one of the biggest causes of this shortage: Demand for STEM skills has
intensified across the entire economy. Not just crying wolf Charette limits his attention to
the demand for people to fill jobs in traditional STEM fields like technology or
healthcare. But even in those fields, demand is strong and growing. Rising demand
for STEM workers is in fact nothing new. A sidebar to Charette's article quotes 80
years' worth of warnings that a looming STEM crisis will hobble U.S. economic
growth. The clear implication of the sidebar is that the education and business leaders who have been making
depress STEM wages.
these warnings have been crying wolf since before the Second World War. But were their fears of a STEM shortage
really much ado about nothing? Hardly. The National Science Foundation ( NSF)
century recessions, it remains robust. NSF puts it at 20 percent between 2000 and 2010, a period during which the
overall workforce experienced little growth. And that robust growth will probably continue. Georgetown's Center on
Education and the Workforce predicts that the total number of STEM jobs will grow 26 percent between 2010 and
The Georgetown Center also projects that professional and technical jobs in
healthcare, which it doesn't include in its STEM numbers, will grow by 31 percent,
far faster than the workforce as a whole. (Charette criticizes a previous projection Georgetown
2020.
released in 2011 for not foreseeing the depth and duration of the recession, but he neglects to mention this more
recent projection, which appeared in June of this year.) It's nice to be in demand Even in recent years of slower
STEM stood at just over 4 percent, well less than the 9.3 percent unemployment
rates for non-STEM workers. People in STEM jobs benefit from being in such high
demand. Study after study confirms that STEM professionals get paid more than non-STEM
professionals -- often much more -- even when you control for their education and
other factors. Contrary to Charette's claim that STEM wages have stagnated, reports
from Georgetown, the Commerce Department, and the Information Technology
Innovation Foundation show that they have risen faster than non-STEM wages, even
in recent years. That is a sign that employers are feeling the pinch. Of course, not every STEM
degree is a ticket to success. Charette is right to point out that people with PhDs in some sciences can have a tough
time finding a job that matches their degrees. But such jobs represent only a very small sliver of the STEM job
The fact that STEM jobs have fared so well even through the recession is
telling. If anything, demand will only intensify as the economy picks up. Don't forget
the STEM technicians! Charette does not address the high demand for a large category of STEM workers:
market.
those who have two-year degrees or certificates rather than bachelor's degrees or higher. In fact, he barely
acknowledges that such workers exist. "Of the 7.6 million STEM workers counted by the Commerce Department,
only 3.3 million possess STEM degrees," he writes. "If many STEM jobs can be filled by people who don't have a
STEM degree, then why the big push to get more students to pursue STEM?" Charette does not mention that, by
Commerce Department
report clearly indicates that the large majority of STEM workers who lack a
bachelor's degree in STEM actually lack a bachelor's degree in any subject. Instead,
most have 2-year degrees or certificates and do jobs that require nothing higher
than that. In fact, Jonathan Roswell of the Brookings Institution feels that studies like Commerce Department
report dramatically undercount such STEM jobs. By his reckoning, STEM workers with an associate's
degree or less account for 10 percent of the entire U.S. workforce . And don't
imagine for a moment that the jobs they do require only low skills. Roswell finds
that those jobs demand a "high level of knowledge" in STEM, and employers are
quick to pay a premium for that knowledge. He estimates that, on average, STEM
jobs that don't require a four-year degree pay 10 percent more than non-STEM jobs
with similar education requirements. Indeed, when business leaders in Change the Equation's
coalition talk about the STEM worker shortage, they are often referring to the
trouble they have finding qualified STEM workers below the bachelor's level. The
evidence is on their side. It's not just about "STEM Jobs" Anymore One major flaw in Charette's argument is
that he overlooks the growing demand for STEM skills beyond traditional STEM jobs . In
fact, what Charette sees as a sign of anemic demand for STEM professionals is quite
the opposite. He observes that people with STEM credentials are not staying in
STEM jobs, but that is only because they have strong job prospects well beyond the
traditional STEM fields. That does not mean that their STEM skills are going to waste. According to NSF,
two thirds of people with degrees in Science and Engineering who end up in jobs
outside of those fields report that their jobs are "closely or somewhat related" to
their degrees. Georgetown's 2011 report on STEM found that STEM professionals are hot
commodities in high-paying fields like finance and management, leaving many more
employers to compete for people in a limited pool of STEM talent . Again, employers are
willing to pay for that talent. People with STEM degrees who go into non-STEM jobs earn 12
percent more than those don't hold degrees in STEM. That wage premium drives
home the point that even non-STEM employers value STEM skills. STEM for all After making
"STEM degrees," he means bachelor's or advanced degrees in STEM. Yet the
such a spirited attack on claims of a STEM shortage, Charette devotes a scant concluding paragraph to what he
calls another "STEM crisis": "the fact that today's students are not receiving a solid grounding in science, math and
shortage are not merely economically devastating. They are devastating to the prospects of millions of low-income
and minority youth who have not received a solid grounding in STEM and therefore have almost no chance to enjoy
the benefits of a STEM career. For those youth in particular, the STEM crisis is unfortunately all too real.
Last month saw a flurry of activity and media focused on climate change, following the release of two major reports
on impacts and action by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Headlines around the world
reflected two main messages. First, climate change impacts are happening now on every continent, posing risks
Recognizing the Danger The reports are the second and third installments from the IPCCs Fifth Assessment Report,
a major collaborative effort by over 1,200 international experts and scientists with approval from 194 governments
that outlines the latest scientific findings on climate change since the last assessment report in 2007. An earlier
installment released in September 2013 on the science of climate change was the first time the IPCC stated
unequivocally that climate change is happening and is caused by anthropogenic, or man-made, activities. According
to the IPCC, if the world continues along its current emissions path, temperatures will increase by up to 4.8 C by
2100. To put it another way, the recent United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) emissions gap report states
that the world needs to reduce up to 8 to 12 gigatons of carbon dioxide-equivalent from the atmosphere in order to
have a good chance of remaining below a 2 degrees Celsius temperature increase above pre-industrial levelsthe
goal agreed to in the U.N. climate change negotiations. This is approximately equivalent to removing the annual
emissions of the United States once and a half over from the atmosphere. And the consequences for the world of
failing to do so are grim, with predicted widespread crop failures, water shortages, loss of biodiversity and increased
U.S.
government released its third National Climate Assessment today, presenting the
latest scientific evidence on climate change impacts in the United States. The report
indicates the effects global climate change is already having on the country,
highlighting severe weather events and the scale of the economic impact. According
to the report, temperatures have already increased 1.3 to 1.9 degrees Fahrenheit
since 1895 (most of it since 1970) , and in most areas of the United States
temperatures are projected to rise by another 2 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit over the
next few decades, or under a high emissions scenario potentially increasing by 5 to
10 degrees Fahrenheit. US Government Action Governments are moving to reduce
emissions and U.S. action remains key, not only because it is the second
largest emitter, but because U.S. leadership is a precondition to ambitious
action by large developing countries such as China . In June 2013 the White House
released a climate action plan, which contains provisions for both adaptation and
mitigation measures at the domestic level. The plan includes over 60 policy proposals
designed to support the U.S. international target of reducing greenhouse gas
emissions by approximately 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020. The White House
conflict over access to diminishing resources. That action is necessary is not in doubt. Adding to this, the
climate action plan, however, has no ambitions for pricing carbonthe most economically efficient way of getting
producers and consumers to take into account the costs for the climate of CO2 emissions. Unfortunately, this
reflects political reality in the United States. In 2009, following the election of President Obama, Congress sought to
pass a cap and trade bill that would price carbon by capping CO2 emissions. While the House of Representatives
passed the bill, the inability of the Senate to act buried the prospect of cap and trade and possibly all efforts to
price carbon in the United States, at least in the near term. The absence of any realistic prospect that Congress will
act constructively on climate change anytime soon means that federal government action to reduce U.S. CO2
However, these EPA regulations are being challenged in the courts and the extent to which they will be successfully
most potentially significant is Californias cap and trade bill which aims to reduce the states CO2 emissions to 1990
levels by 2020representing approximately a 30 percent reduction in the states emissions. This is important
because California is itself the worlds 8th largest economy and 19th largest emitter and has traditionally been a
leader in addressing environmental challenges that have subsequently been adopted federally. Hawaii and
Minnesota have also established economy-wide emissions reduction targets, and several U.S. and Canadian states
and provinces have banded together to create regional climate cap and trade initiatives including the Regional
Greenhouse Gas Initiative and the Western Climate Initiative. In addition, 35 states have renewable energy targets
Caused by Us, and a Threat We Must Deal With." Ted Scambos, a glaciologist and head scientist of
the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) based in Boulder would lead with: "IPCC 2013, Similar Forecasts, Better Certainty." While the
report, which is issued every six to seven years, offers no radically new or alarming news, Scambos told me, it puts an exclamation
point on what we already know, and refines our evolving understanding of global
warming. The IPCC, the indisputable rock star of UN documents, serves as the basis for global climate negotiations, like the ones that
took place in Kyoto, Rio, and, more recently, Copenhagen. (The next big international climate meeting is scheduled for 2015 in Paris.) It is also arguably
the most elaborately vetted and exhaustively researched scientific paper
in existence. Founded in 1988 by the United Nations and the World Meteorological Organization, the IPCC represents the
distilled wisdom of over 600 climate researchers in 32 countries on changes in the Earths
atmosphere, ice and seas. It endeavors to answer the late New York mayor Ed Kochs famous question How am I doing? for all of us. The answer, which
from 1990 and what has taken place since, climate change is proceeding faster than we expected, Mann told me by email. Mann helped develop the
famous hockey-stick graph, which Al Gore used in his film An Inconvenient Truth to dramatize the sharp rise in temperatures in recent times. Mann
continental ice sheets, which are losing ice and contributing to sea level rise at a faster rate than the [earlier IPCC] models had predicted. But there
is a lot that we still dont understand. Reuters noted in a sneak preview of IPCC draft which was leaked in August that, while the broad global trends are
clear, climate scientists were finding it harder than expected to predict the impact in specific regions in coming decades. From year to year, the worlds
hotspots are not consistent, but move erratically around the globe . The same has been true of heat waves,
mega-storms and catastrophic floods, like the recent ones that ravaged the Colorado Front Range. There is broad agreement that
climate change is increasing the severity of extreme weather events, but were not yet able to
predict where and when these will show up. It is like watching a pot boil, Danish astrophysicist and climate scientist Peter
Thejll told me. We understand why it boils but cannot predict where the next bubble will be. There is also
uncertainty about an apparent slowdown over the last decade in the rate of air temperature increase. While some critics claim that
global warming has stalled, others point out that, when rising ocean temperatures are
factored in, the Earth is actually gaining heat faster than previously
anticipated . Temperatures measured over the short term are just one parameter, said Dr Tim
Barnett of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography in an interview. There are far more critical things going on; the
acidification of the ocean is happening a lot faster than anybody thought that it
would, its sucking up more CO2, plankton, the basic food chain of the planet ,
are dying, its such a hugely important signal . Why arent people using that as a measure of what is going on?
Barnett thinks that recent increases in volcanic activity , which spews smog-forming aerosols into the air that deflect solar radiation
and cool the atmosphere, might help account for the temporary slowing of global temperature
rise. But he says we shouldnt let short term fluctuations cause us to lose sight of the big picture. The dispute over temperatures underscores just
how formidable the IPCCs task of modeling the complexity of climate change is. Issued in three parts (the next two installments are due out in the spring),
the full version of the IPCC will end up several times the length of Leo Tolstoys epic War and Peace. Yet every last word of the U.N. document needs to be
I do not know of any other area of any complexity and importance at all
where there is unanimous agreement ... and the statements so strong , Mike
signed off on by all of the nations on earth.
MacCracken, Chief Scientist for Climate Change Programs, Climate Institute in Washington, D.C. told me in an email. What IPCC has achieved is
Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado, Boulder suggested a headline that focuses on the cat fight that todays
report is sure to revive: "Fresh Red Meat Offered Up in the Climate Debate, Activists and Skeptics Continue Fighting Over It." Pielke should know. A critic of
Al Gore, who has called his own detractors "climate McCarthyists," Pielke has been a lightning rod for the political controversy which continues to swirl
around the question of global warming, and what, if anything, we should do about it. The publics skepticism of climate change took a dive after
Hurricane Sandy. Fifty-four percent of Americans are now saying that the effects of global warming have already begun. But 41 percent surveyed in the
same Gallup poll believe news about global warming is generally exaggerated, and there is a smaller but highly passionate minority that continues to
believe the whole thing is a hoax.
For
most
when it comes to the science. What remains in dispute is not whether climate change is happening, but how fast things are going
to get worse. There are some possibilities that are deliberately left out of the IPCC projections, because we simply dont have enough data yet to model
possibility some scientists say likelihood that huge quantities of methane (a greenhouse gas thirty times as potent as CO2) will eventually be
and Trademark Office have been awarded to international owners. Inspiring young Americans to study STEM fields is
critical to reversing this trend and creating a new generation of innovative entrepreneurs. That is why the USA
Science and Engineering Festival the nations largest celebration of science and engineering, to be held April 2829 at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center was created. This weekend, hundreds of thousands of
participants will gather at the Washington Convention Center for what promises to be Americas largest celebration
of science. In his 2010 State of the Union address, President Barack Obama said, The
(Kindleberger 1973). But economic instability obviously has spillover effects into the international political arena. Keynes, writing
after WWI, warned in his seminal tract The Economic Consequences of the Peace that Germanys economic humiliation could have a
radicalizing effect on the nations political culture (Keynes 1919). Given later events, his warning seems prescient. In the years since
the Second World War, however, the European continent has not relapsed into armed conflict. What was different after the second
global conflagration? Crucially, the United States was in a far more powerful position than Britain was after WWI. As the tables above
show, Britains economic strength after the First World War was about 13% of the total in strength in the international system. In
contrast, the United States possessed about 53% of relative economic power in the international system in the years immediately
following WWII. The U.S. helped rebuild Europes economic strength with billions of dollars in investment through the Marshall Plan,
assistance that was never available to the defeated powers after the First World War (Kindleberger 1973). The interwar years were
also marked by a series of debilitating trade wars that likely worsened the Great Depression (Ibid.). In contrast, when Britain was
more powerful, it was able to facilitate greater free trade, and after World War II, the United States played a leading role in creating
institutions like the GATT that had an essential role in facilitating global trade (Organski 1958). The possibility that economic stability
is an important factor in the overall security environment should not be discounted, especially given the results of my statistical
Another theory that could provide insight into the patterns observed in this
research is that of preponderance of power. Gilpin theorized that when a state has
the preponderance of power in the international system, rivals are more
likely to resolve their disagreements without resorting to armed conflict
(Gilpin 1983). The logic behind this claim is simple it makes more sense to challenge a weaker hegemon than a stronger
analysis.
one. This simple yet powerful theory can help explain the puzzlingly strong positive correlation between military conflicts engaged in
by the hegemon and conflict overall. It is not necessarily that military involvement by the hegemon instigates further conflict in the
international system. Rather, this military involvement could be a function of the hegemons weaker position, which is the true
cause of the higher levels of conflict in the international system.
some of the variation found between the economic and military data. The results of this analysis are of clear importance beyond the
realm of theory. As the debate rages over the role of the United States in the world, hegemonic stability theory has some useful
insights to bring to the table. What this research makes clear is that a strong hegemon can exert a positive influence on stability in
the international system. However, this should not give policymakers a justification to engage in conflict or escalate military budgets
between China and Japan (Shambaugh). A strong rising China armed with middle range missiles could be perceived
as threatening by Japan, worried that its historical American ally could not defend it because of US high involvement
increased military spending by 16 per cent in real terms since 2008, including a 9.3 per cent increase in 2011
(Background Paper on Military Expenditures 5). Before 2008, it had increased its military expenditure by 160 per
cent in a decade, (SIPRI, SIPRI Yearbook 2008 199), accounting for 86 per cent of the total increase of 162 per cent
in military expenditure of Eastern Europe, the region of the world with the highest increment in military expenditure
from 1998 to 2007 (SIPRI, SIPRI Yearbook 2008 177). Moreover, the control of the gas prices in Europe and the
enlargement of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Central and Western Europe have already been causes of
that nuclear deterrence could reduce the war-proneness of the coming multi-polar system (Layne, 44-45), the
rest of the world (Sultan; Huntley). A war between Pakistan and India, both nuclear states,
could result in an Armageddon for the whole Asia. An attack from the Democratic Peoples Republic
of Korea (DPRK) on Japan or South Korea will trigger an immediate reaction from the US and a
nuclear proliferation domino effect in East Asia (Huntley, 725). Terrorists armed with nuclear
weapons could wreak havoc and target the heart of the most powerful countries of the world (Bunn and
Wier). Iran, Pakistan, DPRK, terrorist groups will rarely be great powers or poles in a future multi-polar world.
effects of their actions could easily reverberate all over the globe and
the stability of the future
world will therefore depend not only on the unpredictable effects of the rivalry among great
powers, but also on the dangerous potential of middle and small powers and non-state actors
armed with nuclear weapons.
Nevertheless, the
represent another cause of potential instability. For the first time in history,
Scenario 3 is aerospace
Declining STEM is hurting the Aerospace industry, and the
timeframe for the impact is now because of retirements.
Blakey 14 (Marion Blakey, President and CEO Aerospace Institute Association,
THE U.S. AVIATION INDUSTRY AND JOBS: KEEPING AMERICAN MANUFACTURING
COMPETITIVE, March 13th, 2014, Aerospace Institute Association, http://www.aiaaerospace.org/news/the_us_aviation_industry_and_jobs_keeping_american_manufac
turing_competitiv/, JAS)
American aerospace workers are among the most highly productive and skilled workers in the world. With a
global market that is growing rapidly, we must maintain an adequate supply of
workers with degrees in science, technology, engineering and math
(STEM) disciplines and specific manufacturing skills for U. S. industry to
continue to dominate and benefit from the aerospace export market . And
for aviation markets to meet the forecasted demand, we will need to recruit and
train hundreds of thousands of new pilots and maintenance technicians , as a recent
Boeing study has verified. We want to sell those aircraft, train those pilots, and hire those mechanics.
Unfortunately, today America is simply not producing enough workers with the right
technical skills. The U. S. graduates around 300,000 students a year with bachelors or associate degrees in
STEM fields. The February 2012 report of the Presidents Council of Advisors on Science
and Technology (PCAST) recommended that this be raised by one-third to meet our
economic needs. One startling fact is that less than 40% of students who start
college intending to earn a STEM degree actually complete the degree
requirements. We need to turn that around, and AIA and our member companies are working to do just that.
We are collaborating with other stakeholders to increase retention rates in engineering programs by putting in place
policies and practices, such as internships and mentoring, which encourage and support the success of qualified
students. And this is not just about four year degrees. Community colleges and career technical education play an
equally important role in meeting our workforce needs. In fact, today one third of our current STEM employees
employing 100,000 or more), the percentage retirement eligible is already 18.6 percent. We are
experiencing
world.
The last 25 years has represented a remarkable period in our nation's history, if not the entire Westphalian
the United States reigned unchallenged as the world's only world great
power, and the sole military superpower. That was a singularly unique, beautiful
moment, which as you now know, is coming to an end. While the U nited States will
maintain enormous absolute power as far into the future as we can see,
unquestionably, our relative power will decline as we enter a more multi-colored
world, and a world in which our leadership will be increasingly challenged . Now, the
most significant challenge to U.S. global leadership, and the one in my view that promises to be
the most difficult to manage, primarily because we have forgotten about how to do it, is the possible
reemergence of great power competitions. Now, there are many interpretations of the term
"great power," but as a national security executive, I subscribe to John Mearsheimer's definition, which is a
state having sufficient military assets to put up a serious fight in a conventional war
against the most powerful state in the world and which possesses a nuclear
deterrent that can survive a nuclear strike against it. By that narrow definition, if Russia
and China are not great powers now, they certainly have the potential to be. And
under any circumstances, they are going to provide us with an enduring and very
difficult military challenge, which will stress us. Now, the first part, after factions in
Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, its nuclear saber rattling, and its provocative and
aggressively -- overtly aggressive actions from the Baltic states all the way to our
airspace in our far north, Russia represents a clear and present danger . This
era. Throughout,
development is largely unexpected, coming after 25 years of working very, very hard to include Russia within the
European community and cooperate with it on a wide variety of subjects and global issues. And we still seek both of
continues to pursue military-to-military cooperation, confidence-building measures with China. In order to increase
transparency on both of our sides, expand our dialog on a wide variety of security issues, to improve crisis stability,
where a rising power interacts with the established power, 10 have ended in war .
Now, China itself is very keenly aware of this historical dynamic. In its new military
strategy, it states "international competition for the redistribution of power, rights,
and interests is tending to intensify." DOD must therefore hedge against this
international competition turning more heated. Now, for the longest time we've
always felt that the best way to hedge against an overt military competition or even
unexpected clashes with any large state power, is for the U nited States to have a strong
nuclear and conventional deterrent posture. And this posture demands three things: first, we
have to overmatch any potential competitor in the military technical realm. Second,
we have to maintain the ability to project power across transoceanic distances and
defeat any competitor's attempt to project power over intra or inter-theater ranges.
And third, we have to routinely demonstrate both our technical capabilities, as well
as our operational capabilities. Now, without these three fundamental things,
our conventional deterrence posture will be less efective, our overseas
alliances and partnerships will be weakened, and crisis stability will be
undermined.
Unquestionably, after the last 25 years, we need to spend more time thinking about strengthening each of these three pillars of our conventional deterrence posture. Let's take it one by one.
Since the end of World War II we have relied upon our technological superiority. Why? To provide a conventional overmatch to overcome an adversary's advantages in time, space, and size of forces, because generally we are moving
across oceans to meet them. This was particularly true in the last 25 years, when the United States enjoyed remarkable and unparalleled conventional dominance across the spectrum. It was truly a delight-some spot for the
Department of Defense and our military services. We could generally count on unimpeded access on the land, in the air, and in the sea. We were probably most impeded in the aerospace domain. But generally, we could overcome
those type of defenses by virtue of our well-trained all volunteer force, and because we were first and early and aggressive mover on the guided munitions battle network regime, we enjoyed a substantial technical, operational, and
tactical overmatch against all potential regional adversaries. Our global command and control network was without peer, deep, and largely unthreatened. Our space assets, which underwrote our global command and control (C2)
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (AT&L), have been talking about consistently. Now, this erosion
results from a combination of two factors: the first is the last 14 years, we've been rightly focused on our operations
in the Middle East. And now, our post-war budget cuts are limited in the amount of investments that we can make
problem in my view, as the Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the Department and the one who spends the most time
trying to contemplate the character of our defense portfolio, this is one of the most important strategic tasks and
Now, to restore this, you've probably heard that we are starting a new Long-Range Research and Development Planning Program, or LRRDPP. It's under the direction of Under Secretary of Defense Frank
Kendall. Now this follows a solution model based loosely on the LRDPP that we established in the 1970s. And after a serious amount of work, it concluded that the combination of guided conventional munitions, informationalized
battle networks, and stealth would be able to off-set the Soviets' advantage in numerical forces. Now this next iteration of the LRDPP, in the same way aims to identify promising technologies that can be moved into development
within the next five years, as well as long-range science and technology investments that we can make now and have a big payoff in 10 to 20 years. The initial results of these efforts, this will be a continuing effort, but the initial
results are going to be reported to the Secretary of Defense Carter next month. And they will be used to provide me and the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff strategic guidance on how to approach the strategic portfolio in
the FY17 budget preparation and submission. Now, the LRDPP is a longer-range view. We also have the Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO), which was set up by Secretary Carter, that is looking at weapons and systems and platforms
that are either in production now, or in the field now, or programmed now, and how to use them in a different way than they were intended to provide us with an unexpected operational or tactical advantage. So the LRDPP again, a
continuing program, as well as the SCO, both seek to restore a comfortable margin of technological superiority. I want to make sure that everyone understands we are not trying to reduplicate the margin of technical superiority we
joint force, but as guided munitions and battle networking technologies have proliferated globally, fighting such away games are going to be vastly more difficult. You hear this term all the time, A2/AD, anti-access and area denial.
They will use these weapons first to deny us access into a theater, and then if we are successful in getting into a theater, will use these things to deny us freedom of maneuver and action in all domains once there. All of our global
command and control and space capabilities are under increasing threat. And in an unclassified environment, I can't speak too deeply about this, but let me just say that it is very concerning. Our potential adversaries are pursuing a
wide range of cyber and kinetic attack capabilities, and we are going to have to expend a lot of effort to maintain our C2 network and our space capabilities in any future fight. And that is why we are exploring offset strategies: new
combinations of technologies, operational concepts, organizational constructs that will maintain our ability to project combat power into a theater in a place and time of our own choosing. Such new strategies will require us to
leverage commercial innovation, which quite frankly is leading -- is in the leading edge of the types of technologies that we need to consider, and to greatly accelerate the refresh cycle of our new weapons and systems. This is a
much more competitive world than we had in the 1970s, and that is moving much faster. And we have a wider range of potential competitors. And we have a wider range of commercial technologies that can be used in interesting
ways that will surprise us. In fact, the next 25 years, one of the things we must be prepared for is technological surprise. Now, the Air Force's Rapid Capabilities Office, or RCO, is a good organizational example of the type of
innovation and speed to market that we need to sustain and advance our military superiority. It has a streamlined chain of command. It focuses on stable requirements and funding stability and early and prominent involvement of
warfighters. And the combination of all of these things truly reduces cycle times. It demonstrates the magic that occurs when we marry up the operational and acquisition personnel and turn them on to a problem and tell them to
solve it quickly. That's why I'm encouraging all of the other services to set up their own RCO-type organizations. Hopefully, we'll be able to convince the Navy to stand up theirs soon, and then the Army soon thereafter. Now
joint combined arms operations. And because of its rapid global mobility , air power
will likely be the first on the scene in any unexpected crisis in the future.
patience required by this proposed operational design could become unhinged by the pressure of public opinion, in
that the United States could be seen to be shying away from a fight while civilians died in droves. The reality would
likely be somewhat different. VLCCs are in some critical ways far less susceptible to the damage mechanisms
utilized by the Iranians than are warships. It is likely the Iranians could carry out attacks on VLCCs at will; but in
practice, such attacks are unlikely to prevent the tankers from completing their transits. VLCCs are huge vessels
that displace 200,000 to 325,000 tons; they have thick double hulls and modern fire suppression systems and when
laden are filled with a compartmentalized and relatively inert, buoyant substance. 34 This can be compared to an
aircraft carriers 97,000 tons of displacement or a cruisers 9,600 tons of displacement and the generally single hull
construction of warships. 35 Of the 239 tankers attacked 16 during the tanker wars, only 55 (23 percent) were
lost, and these were mostly much smaller vessels than VLCCs and single hulled. 36 Due to economic factors, the
U.S. seems to have time on its side. For the Iranian gambit to work, it must force the U.S. Navy to attempt to
penetrate an intact Iranian sea denial effort with warships before the maritime trade interruption reduces the
Iranian economy to shambles. The United States does not need to immediately respond with warships in the Strait
and national interests are best served if it does not. CONCLUSIONS The Strait of Hormuz is the perfect physical
environment for the execution of sea denial. Its confined waters allow for even relatively short-range weapons
systems to reach the entirety of area being denied. The shallow and relatively calm waters allow for great mine
lethality and the unfettered use of FIAC. The geo-strategic position Iran enjoys along the length of the Strait of
The world is
dependent on the oil which tankers carry through the Strait of Hormuz. Irans economy
Hormuz provides it with a variety of options for surveillance, fires, and the basing of forces.
depends not only on revenues from oil exports but all of its imported goods and resources. If Iran were to interdict
the Strait, the United States must recognize that economically Iran cannot sustain this action for long without
untenable national trade and industry disruption. Irans entire economy and even the morale of its populace are
heavily dependent on maritime trade passing through the Strait. America and much of the world has short-term
strategic options to reduce the economic effects of a Straits of Hormuz closure. Iran does not. These effects could
17 be hastened through the destruction of resource stockpiles and certain key industrial facilities such as refineries.
Tehran has developed a potent littoral force tailor made for sea denial in a chokepoint. A large
number of FAC and FIAC combined with mines and ASCMs provide them a survivable force which possesses
numerous advantages in confined waters over the warships of a blue water navy.
Iran does not, however, have any means of challenging the U.S. for air superiority.
This is Irans critical vulnerability and should be exploited to destroy those systems
conducting sea denial.
Director of the Institute for Security and Conflict Studies at the Elliott School of
International Affairs, at George Washington University, How Oil Influences U.S.
National Security, 2013, International Security, Vol. 38, No. 2, EBSCO)
Strait of hormuz Given the geographical distribution of oil, a disruption large enough to
warrant U.S. military intervention, if one exists at all, is most likely to occur in the
Persian Gulf. During 2011, the daily flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz was 17 million barrels, which was
the vast majority of Persian Gulf oil and almost 20 percent of global production .38 The greatest
danger is now posed by Iran, which in 2011 threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for U.S.
and European sanctions designed to severely reduce Irans oil revenue;39 the sanctions are intended to convince
Iran to forgo its nuclear weapons program. Although concerns about Iran possibly closing the strait are longstanding, estimating the probability that it would actually do this is difcult. Analysts have offered reasons for
expecting the probability to be low: Iran would lose the oil revenue from its own exports; and Iran would likely be
deterred by the probable costs of U.S. intervention, which could include the destruction of key military bases and
occupation of some of its territory.
strait, for example, as retaliation for an attack against its nuclear weapons program or as a coercive measure if it
were losing a conventional war.40 And, of course, if sanctions are highly effective at cutting Irans oil revenue, Iran
has less to lose by disrupting the flow of oil. Because so much oil flows through the strait,
at least given its current policies , would almost certainly respond to keep it open. In early 2012,
the United States communicated to Iran that closing the strait is a red line that would provoke an American
response, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey publicly stated that the United States
would take action and reopen the strait.41 Careful analysis suggests that the United States would succeed in
reopening the strait, but that a successful campaign could take many weeks or more, and that oil prices would
increase significantly during this period.42 Iran would likely be unable to entirely close the strait, among other
reasons because exporters would adapt, employing tactics that would enable them to continue to transit the strait.
One estimate suggests that reducing the flow by one-third would likely be beyond Irans reach.43 Nevertheless,
reductions of this size would be significant, and uncertainty in the oil market, which would add to price increases,
would be even larger. Although a war to regain control of the strait would require substantial U.S. naval and air
forces, the fighting costs of this conventional war would likely not be large (at least compared to recent U.S. ground
wars), because the U.S. military would be able to dominate the fighting and would not need to employ ground
intervene because it believed that this would help to preserve its ability to deter other emerging nuclear powers.45
the continued growth in international students coming to the U.S. for higher
education had a significant positive economic impact on the United States.
International students contributed more than $27 billion to the U.S. economy,
according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Primary source of funding for
international students Open Doors 2014 reports that about 74 percent of all
international students receive the majority of their funds from sources outside of the
United States, including personal and family sources as well as assistance from their
home country governments or universities. Students from around the world who
study in the United States also contribute to America's scientific and technical research
and bring international perspectives into U.S. classrooms, helping prepare American
In 2014,
Visa delays, in general, have already cost this nation dearly over the recent years.
n224 Some of the hardest hit industries have been tourism, n225 foreign investment, n226 and multinational
Consider the following example: James Gimzewski, a citizen of the United Kingdom and a nanotechnology expert, was recruited
several years ago to establish the California NanoSystems Institute, a venture created by UCLA and UC Santa Barbara. n228 Nanotechnology is "the science of making products smaller, lighter and more powerful," and many U.S.
firms believe that it could have the impact on industrial development that the Internet had on [*727] communications. n229 In 2004, Gimzewski left the U.S. and on his attempted return he was denied access to the U.S. for over a
month while his visa was being processed for renewal. n230 The processing time would have been longer but Gimzewski was able to purchase an $ 8,000 one-way ticket from Switzerland, to Quebec, and then to Los Angeles, where
his immigration attorney convinced a U.S. consular official to speed up the process. n231 Assume that he had not been so fortunate and that he had been stranded for so long that he decided to accept employment with another
nanotechnology firm in the U.K. Also assume that nanotechnology became immensely profitable, and Gimzewski's innovations were vital to its success. Under our new set of circumstances, the U.K.'s economy would be collecting the
76 million baby boomers in the workforce and only 46 million "Gen[eration] Xers"
available to fill those positions. n248 While current and future labor-saving technologies will help close
that gap, the report estimates that by 2010 there will be a skilled labor shortage of about 5 million people. n249
n250 The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that by 2010, an additional 2.2 million jobs will be available in the
areas of science and engineering. n251 Further, the Educational Testing Service estimates that between 2010 and
To
help curb this looming worker deficit, the U.S. must be able to attract foreign talent
with the success it had in the past. With more and more skilled positions likely to be
available in the near future, there will be plenty of positions to offer to foreign
workers. Thus, the U.S. will need to make sure that it can continue to make
the nation an appealing place to come to study and work. Changes must be
made to account for the increased global competition for these individuals and to
curb the current visa policies that are driving important foreign intellectual capital
away.
2020, the number of jobs that will require some form of post- secondary skills will surpass 10 million. n252
The years before 1914 saw the formation of trade blocs separated by high tariff barriers. Back
then, the world was dominated by several roughly equivalent powers, albeit with different strengths and
weaknesses. Today, the world is similarly multi-polar. The United States is in a position of clear leadership, but China
is coming up fast. Europe is weaker than it was, but is still a force to be reckoned with. Japan, Russia, Brazil, India
are also too powerful to ignore. A hundred years ago, big international infrastructure projects such as the BerlinBaghdad Railway, and before it the Suez Canal, were built to protect favored trading. Todays equivalent may be the
bilateral mining partnerships forged between, for instance, China and mineral-rich African states. Today, the World
Trade Organization offers some defence against tariffs. But protectionism could be become entrenched if prolonged
economic stagnation leads countries to pursue their own narrow interests. Germany, Austria, Russia and France lost
between 20 and 35 percent of national output between 1913 and 1918, according to Angus Maddisons data used in
Stephen Broadberrys The Economics of World War One: A Comparative Analysis. British GDP declined in 1914
and 1915, but grew 15 percent over the four years, as did the U.S. economy. The 37 million military and civilian
Archduke Ferdinand that sparked World War One, the catalyst for cataclysm might be something quite surprising. A
global run on bank and other investment assets or an outbreak of hyperinflation, maybe? These threats get more
If global wealth
evaporates, or is proven to be an illusion, todays largely cordial global entente could be
smashed with precipitous speed.
serious the more policymakers pump up equity, bond, property and banking bubbles.
ISIS
Advantage Two: ISIS
The fight against ISIS is about winning hearts and minds, not
hard lining
Mirza 3/16/15, Waqas Mirza has an MA in social anthropology from SOAS, University of London. Winning
Hearts and Minds< https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/03/terrorism-america-isis-obama/>//ak
supposed threats from al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and the
Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (IS) to the Taliban in Pakistan (TTP). It mentioned deadly
attacks in Ottawa, Sydney, Paris, and Copenhagen and concluded that the
campaign to prevent people around the world from being radicalized to violence is
ultimately a battle for hearts and minds. In his speech, Obama suggested that Muslim leaders also
Obamas op-ed highlighted
needed to play their prescribed roles in this battle for hearts and minds by doing more to discredit the notion that
our nations are determined to suppress Islam. The fierce criticism of the summit hasnt just come from the Right. A
joint statement by a coalition that includes the American Civil Liberties Union, the American-Arab AntiDiscrimination Committee, the Council on American Islamic Relations CAIR, DRUMSouth Asian Organizing Center,
the stigmatization
of American Muslim communities under CVE, which sets them apart as inherently
suspect and falls under a long line of programs that defines relationships with
American Muslim communities based on a security lens, without meaningfully
addressing civil and human rights problems. The nearly exclusive focus on Muslim
communities under CVE, the signatories argue, has also enabled hate crime by private
actors. Other objections include a reliance on flawed models of radicalization, the creation
of a climate of fear through community surveillance over the beliefs and expressive or associational
activities of other Muslims, the law enforcements deeply troubling record of
engagement with American Muslim communities , and the governments prerogative of picking
and others represents the most comprehensive critique of these. The signatories object to
specific religious and community partners to fund and collaborate with. Such critiques are important in their own
right. There certainly is a need to explicate the effects of government programs on their intended targets and as
such, the joint statement along with other similar critiques
Most importantly,
educating foreign students is a crucial step in foreign relations
development (e.g., people-to-people diplomacy) given that many current foreign leaders
(e.g., Kofi Annan, Hamid Karzai) have been educated in the U.S. and presumably, many
future leaders will also spend some of their formative years in the U.S. Having a
dependents spending $12 billion in our economy each year (p. 1, Johnson, 2003).
positive experience with their furlough in the U.S., international students take their
understanding and appreciation of our culture and their feelings of goodwill back to
their homeland. Future collaborative efforts between American academics and foreign students serve to
strengthen these positive images and connections. Thus, the foreign student on a university
campus is a precious commodity who needs to be protected and the relationship
fostered. Unfortunately, there is ample evidence to suggest that the opposite
may be occurring . That is, individuals of Middle Eastern descent not being protected
but are actively discriminated against through formal international policy and
informally through the attitudes of American citizens. The policies instituted by the government
and legal venues after the events of September 11, 2001 (hence, termed post 9-11) raise questions about the
future direction of American relationships with foreign students, scientists, and faculty.
Perhaps the policy that has had the greatest impact on university students is the Student
and Exchange Visitor Information System that was proposed by the Department of Homeland Security and
implemented by the Department of Justice and the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) on January 30, 2003. SEVIS is the
implementation of Section 641 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 with the Enhanced Border
Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 providing additional clarification concerning the need to collect information on students
with the goal of protecting national security. SEVIS was instituted in order to tighten and improve tracking procedures for the one
million foreign students and exchange visitors residing in the U.S. each year. This internet-based system maintains a database of
current information on nonimmigrant students, exchange visitors, and their dependents until they graduate. As such, SEVIS requires
that students and their host universities report: (a) when the student arrives on campus, (b) failure of a student to enroll, (c) fulltime enrollment, (d) when a student drops below a full course load without prior authorization from INS, (e) any failure to maintain
status or complete the program, (f) change in name or address within 10 days, (g) start date of each term, (h) a students transfer to
another program, (i) program extensions, (j) off campus employment, and (k) any other major changes to the students program of
manifestation of bin Laden's design. The group has grown faster than any terrorist
group we can remember, and the threat it poses to us is as wide-ranging as any we
have seen. What ISIS has that al-Qaeda doesn't is a Madison Avenue level of sophisticated messaging and social
media. ISIS has a multilingual propaganda arm known as al-Hayat, which uses GoPros and
cameras mounted on drones to make videos that appeal to its followers. And ISIS uses just about every
tool in the platform boxfrom Twitter to YouTube to Instagramto great effect, attracting
fighters and funding. Digital media are one of the group's most significant strengths; they have helped ISIS
become an organization that poses four significant threats to the U.S. First , it is a threat to the
stability of the entire Middle East. ISIS is putting the territorial integrity
of both Iraq and Syria at risk. And a further collapse of either or both of
these states could easily spread throughout the region, bringing with it
sectarian and religious strife, humanitarian crises and the violent
redrawing of borders, all in a part of the world that remains critical to U.S.
national interests . ISIS now controls more territoryin Iraq and Syriathan any other
terrorist group anywhere in the world. When al-Qaeda in Iraq joined the fight in Syria, the group
changed its name to ISIS. ISIS added Syrians and foreign fighters to its ranks, built its supply of arms and money
and gained significant battlefield experience fighting Bashar Assad's regime. Together with the security vacuum in
Iraq and Nouri al-Maliki's alienation of the Sunnis, this culminated in ISIS's successful blitzkrieg across western Iraq
in the spring and summer of 2014, when it seized large amounts of territory. ISIS is not the first extremist group to
take and hold territory. Al-Shabab in Somalia did so a number of years ago and still holds territory there, al-Qaeda in
the Islamic Maghreb did so in Mali in 2012, and al-Qaeda in Yemen did so there at roughly the same time. I fully
expect extremist groups to attempt to takeand sometimes be successful in takingterritory in the years ahead.
decade ago. And there are more foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq today than there were in Afghanistan in the 1980s
working to drive the Soviet Union out of that country. These foreign nationals are getting experience on the
battlefield, and they are becoming increasingly radicalized to ISIS's cause. There is a particular subset of these
fighters to worry about. Somewhere between 3,500 and 5,000 jihadist wannabes have traveled to Syria and Iraq
who went to fight in Syria, returned to Europe and shot three people at the Jewish Museum of Belgium in Brussels.
The third threat is that
the world. The allied exaltation is happening at a faster pace than al-Qaeda ever enjoyed. It has occurred in
Algeria, Libya, Egypt and Afghanistan. More will follow. These groups, which are already dangerous,
will become even more so. They will increasingly target ISIS's enemies (including us), and
they will increasingly take on ISIS's brutality. We saw the targeting play out in early 2015 when an ISIS-associated
group in Libya killed an American in an attack on a hotel in Tripoli frequented by diplomats and international
we saw the extreme violence play out just a few weeks after that when
another ISIS-affiliated group in Libya beheaded 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians . And
businesspeople. And
fourth, perhaps most insidiously, ISIS's message is radicalizing young men and women around the globe who have
never traveled to Syria or Iraq but who want to commit an attack to demonstrate their solidarity with ISIS. These are
lone wolves. Even before May 4, such an ISIS-inspired attack had already occurred in the U.S.: an
individual with sympathies for ISIS attacked two New York City police officers with a
hatchet. Al-Qaeda has inspired such U.S. attacksthe Fort Hood shootings in late 2009 that killed 13
and the Boston Marathon bombing in spring 2013 that killed five and injured nearly 300. The attempted
attack in Texas is just the latest of these. We can expect more of these kinds of attacks in the U. S. Attacks
by ISIS-inspired individuals are occurring at a rapid pace around the world roughly 10 since ISIS
the so-called
took control of so much territory. Two such attacks have occurred in Canada, including the October 2014 attack on
the Parliament building. And another occurred in Sydney, in December 2014. Many planning such attacksin
Australia, Western Europe and the U.S.have been arrested before they could carry out their terrorist plans. Today
ISIS's
capabilities will grow. This is what a long-term safe haven in Iraq and Syria would give ISIS, and it is
exactly what the group is planning to do. They have announced their intentionsjust like bin Laden
an ISIS-directed attack in the U. S. would be relatively unsophisticated (small-scale), but over time
ISIS will shut down the U.S. national grid itll independently
kill 9 out of 10 Americans
Bedard 9/3/14 Paul, columnist at the Washington Examiner, New ISIS threat:
America's electric grid; blackout could kill 9 of 10
http://washingtonexaminer.com/new-isis-threat-americas-electric-grid-blackoutcould-kill-9-of-10/article/2552766
Former top government officials who have been warning Washington about the vulnerability of
the nations largely unprotected electric grid are raising new fears that troops from
the jihadist I slamic S tate are poised to attack the system , leading to a power crisis
that could kill millions . Inadequate grid security, a porous U.S.-Mexico border, and
fragile transmission systems make the electric grid a target for ISIS , said Peter Pry,
one of the nations leading experts on the grid . Others joining Pry at a press conference later
Wednesday to draw attention to the potential threat said that if just a handful of the nations high
voltage transformers were knocked out, b lackouts would occur across the
country. By one estimate, should the power go out and stay out for over a year, nine out of 10
Americans would likely perish , said Frank Gaffney, founder and president of the Center
for Security Policy in Washington. At the afternoon press conference, Gaffney dubbed the potential crisis the
"grid jihad." A lack of electricity would shut off water systems, impact city transportation
services and shutdown hospitals and other big facilities. Fresh and frozen foods also would be
impacted as would banks, financial institutions and utilities. Pry provided details of recent
attacks on electricity systems and said that ISIS could easily team with Mexican drug
cartels to ravage America. He told Secrets, for example, that the Knights Templar drug
gang blacked out the electric grid of the Mexican state of Michoacan in 2013 to provide
cover for killing those fighting the drug trade . The Knights Templars and other criminal
gangs in Mexico will do anything for money, and ISIS , the richest terrorist
organization in history, has hundreds of millions of dollars at its disposal , said
Pry. ISIS could hire one of the Mexican cartels, or one of their criminal gangs already in the
U.S., or activate jihadist terror cells already in the U.S., and inflict a multi-state
blackout immediately , within days or weeks . Perhaps even a nationwide
blackout , Pry explained to Secrets. I am not saying it is likely they will do so. But given the capabilities
and objectives of ISIS and our obvious vulnerabilities, it would be foolish to ignore the threat to
the grid, to regard the threat as unlikely. Our planning should be based on imminent
asymmetrical threats , and not assume that another 9/11 large-scale attack is years away, he added.
National War College and a Senior Fellow and Energy and Environmental Security and Policy Chair in
the Center for Strategic Research, Institute for National Strategic Studies, at the National Defense
University, and Hanna Breetz, doctoral candidate in the Department of Political Science at The
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Small Nuclear Reactorsfor Military Installations:Capabilities,
Costs, andTechnological Implications, www.ndu.edu/press/lib/pdf/StrForum/SF-262.pdf)
DOD is unable to provide its bases with electricity when the civilian
electrical grid is offline for an extended period of time. Currently, domestic military installations
Grid Vulnerability.
receive 99 percent of their electricity from the civilian power grid . As explained in a recent
study from the Defense Science Board: DODs key problem with electricity is that critical missions, such as national
strategic awareness and national command authorities, are almost entirely dependent on the national transmission
grid . . . [which] is fragile, vulnerable, near its capacity limit, and outside of DOD control. In most cases, neither the
grid nor on-base backup power provides www.ndu.edu/inss SF No. 262 3 sufficient reliability to ensure continuity of
critical national priority functions and oversight of strategic missions in the face of a long term (several months)
outage. 7 The grids fragility was demonstrated during the 2003 Northeast blackout in which 50 million people in
the United States and Canada lost power, some for up to a week, when one Ohio utility failed to properly trim trees.
The blackout created cascading disruptions in sewage systems, gas station pumping, cellular communications,
border check systems, and so forth, and demonstrated the interdependence of modern infrastructural systems. 8
Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure are not well understood. It is not clear, for instance, whether existing terrorist
Government and private organizations are currently working to secure the grid against attacks; however, it is not
clear that they will be successful. Most military bases currently have backup power that allows them to function for
a period of hours or, at most, a few days on their own. If power were not restored after this amount of time, the
results could be disastrous. First, military assets taken offline by the crisis would not be available to help with
major combat operations. During the Cold War, this type of event was far less likely because the making bases
more resilient to civilian power outages would reduce the incentive for an opponent to attack the grid United States
and Soviet Union shared the common understanding that
could escalate to nuclear war. Americas current opponents, however, may not share this fear or be
deterred by this possibility.
Solvency
Generic
Surveillance deters international studentsmakes the US less
attractive to them
Ciment and Radzilowski 15, James Ciment, highly experienced writer, editor, producer, and
publisher of print books, ebooks, databases, and digital content with an extensive list of critically acclaimed
publications., John Radzilowski, history teacher, American Immigration: An Encyclopedia of Political, Social, and
Cultural Exchange, Routledge, Mar 17, 2015
Government actions after the 9/11 attacks had a negative impact on those living in
the United States as immigrants or noncitizens. During the first year after 9/11. the expanded
definitions of "terrorist" and -immigrant" under the USA PATRIOT Act created new restrictions on student visas.
As a
result, the United States became less attractive to international students, which, in
turn, had a bearing on the U.S. labor market, higher education system, and
economy, as persons who might have contributed needed skills and talents to the
U.S. economy and education system were either denied entry or became too
discouraged to apply for entry. The Office of the Attorney General stripped the
Board of Immigration Appeals (a part of the Department of Justice) of its power, rendering
review of immigration cases essentially nonexistent and immigration judges
obsolete. Similarly, the US. Supreme Courts review of the anti-immigration laws of
1996 came to a halt, and stronger enforcement of those laws became a central
focus of the DHS. Muslim, Arab, and Middle Eastern immigrants were severely
affected by these immigration policy changes after 9/11. The federal government
detained and interviewed hundreds of Middle Eastern men based on their
immigration status and country of origin. Post-9/11 immigration policies were aimed
at maintaining strict vigilance with regard to immigration-both legal and illegal -to
the United States. Of the estimated 12 million undocumented foreign nationals residing
in the United States in 2012, a majority are of Latin American descent. Since 9/11,
they have been subject to enhanced enforcement of immigration laws, including
workplace raids, detention, and, for those who have overstayed their visas,
deportation for minor visa violations.
Foreign matriculation at American universities declined alter 9/11, as students had difficulty obtaining visas.
I
understand the state needs the money yet I also wonder if it eliminates
opportunities for some Oregonians. Tina Orwall, a Washington state legislator, in 2012
introduced an amendment to a tuition bill that allowed the University of Washington to
Visa restrictions and changes in the U.S. Immigration process after 9/11 terrorist attacks are
gruesome, discouraging, sometimes downright humiliating, and negatively affect the
numbers of students coming to study in the United States. International students contribute
greatly to the U.S. economy and culture. However, there is very little research about their challenges in obtaining
visas to enter the U.S. and the policies that control their ability to exit and reenter the country. Further, there is
scarce research that investigates how international students are welcomed in the U.S. post 9/11 and how they
overcome visa obstacles and challenges, how they cognitively negotiate and co-create categories of self and
concept of self and making meaning while being immersed in campus culture and living in post 9/11 American
The threat of terrorism brought about new laws and policies that triggered debates
The USA Patriot 5 Act, the Enhanced Border
Security Act, and the Homeland Security Act have affected individuals, processes and
technologies associated with entering and exiting the U.S. through increased surveillance , biometric
identification, and tracking of visitors. According to Doumani, the higher learning institution, post
9/11, has been subjected "to an increasingly sophisticated infrastructure of
surveillance, intervention, and control by government agencies a nd private advocacy"
society.
(2006, 11). Hence, this dissertation examines the transformation of American society post 9/11, and my hypothesis
is that international
students from the Middle East and certain countries in Asia have a
greater chance of being scrutinized and have greater challenges in obtaining visas
to study in the U.S. than students from other geographical regions, including Europe.
SEVIS
The implementation of SEVIS has drastically reduced the
number of foreign studentsthis reduction was the largest one
in thirty yearsproves SEVIS was the key cause
***FYI, IE stands for International Education
Trilokekar 15,
Roopa Desai Trilokekar, has worked in the U.S., India and Canada in various capacities
facilitating international academic exchanges, FROM SOFT POWER TO ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY? A Comparison Of
The Changing Rationales And Roles Of The U. S. And Canadian Federal Governments In International Education,
CSHE, 2/9/15,
http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/shared/publications/docs/ROPS.CSHE_.2.15.DesaiTrilokekar.SoftPowe
rEconDeplomacy.2.9.2015.pdf
This presidential level support for IE , even if mostly rhetorical, was dramatically challenged
with the catastrophic events of September 11, 2001. With 9/11, IE posed a risk to the nations
security. Recoiling back to restrictive immigration policy processes initiated as a
response to the Iranian crisis and the world trade center bombings, a new tracking
system for international students was introduced by the Bush (Jr.) administration (2001-9). The
passage of the US Patriot Act, the Enhance Border Security Act, the Homeland
Security Act, and the Visa Entry Reform Act facilitated the federal governments
restrictive immigration policies and the implementation in 2003 of the controversial
Student and Exchange Visitors Information System (SEVIS), administered by the new Department of Homeland
Security (operations were still DS responsibility).83 As Witt states, the entire landscape of
international education in the US shifted dramatically from a posture of recruitment
to one of determent, from receptive to suspicious, from hospitable to hostile .84 The
global war on terrorism replaced the cold war as the national security meta
narrative.85 This was a time of crisis in IE with the U.S. experiencing its first
substantial drop in foreign students for the first time in over 30 years. Such a drop
was not experienced even during the cold war. This drop severely impacted U.S.
universities who were both dependent on foreign graduate students for advanced
research in the STEM fields as well as on revenues from international student fees.
The advocacy groups urged the government to strike an appropriate balance
between the conflicting demands of strengthening homeland security and
maintaining openness to the world.86 International programs, they suggested were an investment in
the nations security. Powerful industrialists/business figures like Bill Gates supported the
need for America to welcome foreign students to strengthen its innovation capacity
and global competitiveness. Both national security and global economic competition
were identified as important rationales and the secure borders, open doors
campaign came to dominate the IE policy discourse. I E faced a uniquely
challenging and paradoxical environment 87 because there was bipartisan political support for IE
and in spite of the federal perspective of IE as a risk to national security, in May 2002, the Bush administration
announced legislation to significantly increase funding for exchange programs. The Cultural Bridges Act of 2002
authorized $95 million/year from 2003-7 for new and expanded IE programs with the Islamic world. As Campbell
cogently states, mutual understanding ha[d] come back into the [federal] frame but with a harder edge, lined
primarily with the notion of global competence and Americas need to CSHE Research & Occasional Paper Series
TRILOKEKAR: From Soft Power to Economic Diplomacy 9 communicate and relate in a multi-cultural globalized,
visible advocate[s] for exchanges supporting a budget of $430 million (from $74 million) in 2006 for the DS public
diplomacy initiatives. Described as a period of public diplomacy renaissance 90 it was reminiscent of the Reagan
administration support for exchanges. Powerful dignitaries such as Secretary of States, Colin Powell and Condoleza
Rice spoke of IE as the governments soft power tool. Several new initiatives and policy priorities developed during
this current era; public diplomacy, an investment in academic exchanges, particularly with the Islamic world,
investment in study abroad for American students (2005 Commission on Abraham Lincoln Study Abroad Fellowship
Program and the Senator Paul Simon Study Abroad Foundation Act) and concern with improving the market share of
international students (2009, government accountability office (GAO) study on challenges and best practices in
Act has affected the creative class primarily through its reestablishment of the
computerized tracking system of foreign students, [*718] named the Student Exchange and
Visitor Information System (SEVIS) n168 -a program that had initially been created through the Illegal Immigrant
Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 n169 (IIRIRA). " SEVIS increases the ability of the
INS to maintain up-to-date information on foreign students and exchange visitors in
order to ensure that they arrive in the United States, show up and register at the
school or exchange program, and properly maintain their status during their stay ."
n170 The Patriot Act's establishment of SEVIS has directly afected the creative class
because the slow and inefective implementation of the tracking program
has led to unnecessary and costly visa delays. n171
When international students and scholars do successfully obtain [*14] visas, they
then must deal with the requirements of the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System
(SEVIS) enacted after 9/11. n61 SEVIS is an electronic database that is required for all
colleges and universities that accept international students and scholars. n62 SEVIS
"collects and maintains pertinent information on nonimmigrant students and
exchange visitors, [their spouses], and the schools and exchange visitor sponsors that
host these individuals in the United States." n63 International students and visiting
scholars are fingerprinted and their names are routinely checked against
sophisticated government databases for possible criminal or other information that
may disqualify them. n64 The federal government requires all male visa applicants
between the ages of 16-45 to fill out additional forms disclosing private information
about themselves, their families, and their activities. n65 Not only are SEVIS
requirements difficult to understand, time consuming, and an intrusion
into the private lives of international students and scholars, they also
jeopardize the safety and security of international students and scholars .
Despite claims that SEVIS is a secure database, in 2005, " a hacker broke into a University of Nevada
at Las Vegas online database for ... SEVIS and gained access to personal information
for about 5,000 current and former international students and scholars." n66 The
stolen information consisted of names, [*15] "birth dates, passport numbers, Social
Security numbers[,]" and other sensitive information about the international
students, their spouses, and families. n67 Other universities that have faced similar
The J-1
visa is the most widely used type for visitors coming temporarily to the U nited States
to conduct research or teach at U.S. institutions. Their stays may be as brief as a few weeks or as
long as five years. The regulations governing the J-1 visa and its various subcategories,
Simplify complex J-1 exchange visitor visa regulations and remove impediments to bona fide exchange.
however, are complex and often pose significant problems for universities, research
laboratories, and the scientific community, as illustrated by the following examples.
A young German researcher, having earned a Ph.D. in civil and environmental
engineering in his home country, accepted an invitation to spend 17 months as a
postdoctoral associate in J-1 Research Scholar status at a prestigious U.S. research
university. He subsequently returned to Germany. A year later, he applied for and
was awarded a two-year fellowship from the German government to further his
research. Although he had a U.S. university eager to host him for the postdoctoral
fellowship, a stipulation in the J-1 exchange visitor regulations that disallows returns
within 24 months prevented the university from bringing him back in the Research
Scholar category. There was no other visa for such a stay, and the researcher
ultimately took his talent and his fellowship elsewhere. A tenured professor
in an Asian country was granted a nine-month sabbatical, which he spent at a U.S.
university, facilitated by a J-1 visa in the Professor category. He subsequently returned to
his country of residence, his family, and his position. An outstanding scholar,
described by a colleague as a future Nobel laureate, he was appointed a permanent
visiting professor at the U.S. university the following year. Because of the J-1
regulations, however, unless he comes for periods of six months or less when he visits, he cannot
return on the J-1 exchange visitor visa. And if he does return for six months or less
multiple times, he must seek a new J-1 program document, be assigned a new ID
number in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), pay a $180 SEVIS fee, and
seek a new entry visa at a U.S. consulate before each individual visit. The current J-1
regulations also stipulate that he must be entering the U nited States for a new
purpose each time, which could pose additional problems
. The J-1 is one of three visa categories used by most STEM students
and professional visitors in scientific and engineering fields coming to the United States: F-1 (nonimmigrant student), J-1 (cultural or educational exchange visitor), or H-1B (temporary worker in a specialty occupation). B1/ B2 visas
(visits for business, including conferences, or pleasure or a combination of the two) are also used in some instances. Each of these categories applies to a broad range of applicants. The F-1 visa, for example, is required not just for
STEM students but for full-time university and college students in all fields, elementary and secondary school students, seminary students, and students in a conservatory, as well as in a language school (but not a vocational school).
Similarly, the J-1 covers exchange visitors ranging from au pairs, corporate trainees, student interns, and camp counselors to physicians and teachers as well as professors and research scholars. Another J-1 category is for college
and university students who are financed by the United States or their own governments or those participating in true exchange programs. The J-1 exchange visitor visa for research scholars and professors is, however, entangled
A 24-month bar prohibits a former Professor or Researcher (and any member of her family who accompanied her) from engaging in another program in the Professor or Researcher category until 24 months
have passed since the end date of the J-1 program. The exception to the bars is for professors or researchers who are hosted by their J program sponsor in the Short-Term Scholar category. This category has a limit of six months with
no possibility of extension. The regulations governing this category indicate that such a visitor cannot participate in another stay as a Short-Term Scholar unless it is for a different purpose than the previous visit. However, as written,
the current regulations have had the effect of imposing the 24-month bar on visitors in the Professor and Researcher categories who have spent any period of participation (one month, seven months, or two years), most far shorter
than the five-year maximum. Unless such a visitor is brought in under the Short-Term Scholar category (the category exempt from the bars) for six months or less only, the 24-month bar applies. Similarly, spouses of former J-1
exchange visitors in the Professor or Researcher categories who are also researchers in their own right and have There are valid reasons for rules and regulations intended to prevent exchange visitors from completing one program
and immediately applying for another. In other words, the rules should ensure that exchanges are really exchanges and not just a mechanism for the recruitment of temporary or permanent workers. It appears that the regulation was
initially conceived to count J-1 program participation toward spent any period as a J-2 dependent while accompanying a J-1 spouse are also barred from returning to the United States to engage in their own J-1 program as a
Professor or Researcher until 24 months have passed. This applies whether or not that person worked while in the United States as a J-2. In addition, spouses subject to the two-year home residency requirement (a different, statutory
U.S. universities
are increasingly engaging in longer-term international research projects with
dedicated resources from foreign governments, private industry, and international
consortia, and are helping to build capacity at foreign universities, innovation
centers, and tech hubs around the world. International researchers travel to the
United States to consult, conduct research, observe, and teach the next generation of
STEM students. The concept of exchange, born in the shadow of the Cold War,
must be expanded to include the contemporary realities of worldwide collaboration
and facilitate rather than inhibit frequent and repeat stays for varying periods. In
bar based on a reciprocal agreement between the United States and foreign governments) cannot change to J-1 status inside the United States or seek a future J-1 program on their own.
be any movement on the provisions of most concern to the research community. However, the department is
may prove
to be a particularly opportune time to craft a regulatory fix to the
impediments
reported to have taken up the issue again, and a new version of the regulations is anticipated. This
SEVIS causes a massive decrease in foreign students-Jaeger and Burnett 03 Paul T. Jaeger is Senior Research Associate and EBSCO Fellow at the
Information Use Management and Policy Institute and is a doctoral student at Florida State Universitys School of
Information Studies. He has earned a Juris Doctor and masters degrees in information studies and education. His
research focuses on legal and policy issues related to information and education. Gary Burnett holds a Ph.D. in
English from Princeton University and is an Assistant Professor at the School of Information Studies at Florida State
University, where he teaches courses in the development and organization of online information resources, 9/1/03,
Curtailing online education in the name of homeland security: The USA PATRIOT Act, SEVIS, and international
students in the United States< http://www.firstmonday.dk/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1073/993>//ak
As a result of the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act and subsequent laws and regulations, SEVIS will monitor
international students studying the United States (P.L. 107-56, 416). Following the passage of the USA PATRIOT
Act, the expansive role for SEVIS was reinforced by the passage of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry
Reform Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-173), which legislated the enhancement of SEVIS in line with the requirements of USA
disciplinary actions taken against the student. The duties of the Immigration and Naturalization
Service have been folded into the new Department of Homeland Security, with SEVIS and the oversight of
international students now being a function of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs, a law enforcement agency
(Arnone, 2003b). The regulations regarding the monitoring of international students that have been promulgated
following the USA PATRIOT Act and the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act create Byzantine
requirements and restrictions for international students studying in the United States (see U.S. Department of
Justice/Immigration and Naturalization Service, 2003). The requirements include very specific dictates on what
information must be provided and when, how many course hours must be taken, and how those hours must be
completed. These restrictions are a change in U.S. policy, as many universities previously treated international
students as similar to out-of-state students (Altbach, 2000). David Ward ,
these individuals will still face extensive questioning about their beliefs
before they can have a chance to travel to the United States. Though stricter standards for
(Arnone, 2003c),
any visitor to the United States to get a visa will affect many industries and areas of society (CNN, 2003a),
institutions of higher education seem likely face significant impacts from the new
policies. The National Association of Foreign Student Advisors estimates that 15-30 percent of
international students who would have come to the United States will choose to
study in Australia, Canada, or the United Kingdom as a result of SEVIS (Treyster, 2003).
Colleges and universities in the United States have already seen "a massive decrease in
the number of students from Muslim states, scores of foreign faculty
being unable to teach courses, [and] scientific research projects becoming
delayed or derailed " [7]. In the summer of 2003, enrollment by international students in
language programs in the United States had dropped 30.5 percent from pre-USA PATRIOT Act
levels (Young, 2003). Universities in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the Middle East
have seen an increase of up to five times as many applicants as pre-2001 levels, while some
Australian universities are marketing themselves internationally as an alternative to
the strict and unforgiving requirements that international students now face in the
United States (Paden and Singer, 2003).
(ICE) is conducting an independent Analysis of Alternatives (AOA) to evaluate the options and costs to close
remaining vulnerabilities. Depending on which alternative ICE chooses will determine if additional costs will be
incurred by the schools.
AT: Obamas XO
Obamas change doesnt helpno actual proofthis is from
their own evidence
Shanmugham 15, Sangeetha Shanmugham, World Education Services, International STEM Students
Will Benefit from Obamas Executive Action, Wesstudentadvisor, Jan 14, 2015,
http://www.wesstudentadvisor.org/2015/01/international-stem-students-will.html#.dpuf
What does this mean for international students who wish to work in the U.S.? STEM students will likely see an
Add-ons
Education
Foreign students are key to support the economics universities
by paying tuitionthis makes scholarships more available to
American students
Flavia R. da Silva-Benson, 2004, an attorney in Medfield, MA, 38 New Eng. L.
Rev. 807 LENGTH: 20465 words NOTE: NEW UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION POLICIES
AND HOW THE CURTAILMENT OF STUDENT VISAS WILL AFFECT THE INTERESTS OF
DIVERSITY IN AMERICAN SOCIETY
International students are a form of trade that is quite valuable and necessary for
colleges and universities. Unfortunately, the new immigration policies restrict this
valuable form of trade. n236 International students contribute billions of dollars to the
national economy each year. In 2002-2003, for example, the Association of International
Educators reported that foreign students contributed $ 12.85 billion to the U nited
States economy. n237 While this is a large contribution, this amount reflects only a
one-percent increase from the previous academic year. n238 This one-percent increase has
been the "smallest increase" since the 1995-1996 academic year. n239 Clearly, disallowing
international students into the United States has a negative economic impact. This
government funded survey boasts how the American economy did not suffer from
the post September 11 policies; however, if one takes into account the amount of
students that should have been studying in the United States but were denied visas,
the economic numbers for 2002-2003 would have been much higher . n240 Therefore, this
favorable economic influx is already suffering a decline. Even a small drop in foreign students can
adversely affect the economics of colleges and universities. In public institutions, for
example, foreign students pay up to four times the fee that in-state students pay.
n241 In private institutions, they pay full tuition and are not eligible for any financial
aid. n242 Colleges and universities rely on foreign students to pay these
tuitions. n243 There is a direct correlation between the payment of full tuition and
scholarships - the more full tuition is received, the more scholarships become
available to American students. n244 In this way, "the economic costs of limiting
immigration are too high; too many components of [*831] American economic
prosperity are dependent on such flows." n245
being a foreign student in the U.S. usually means paying full tuition. And
Tuition for international students can sometimes be even more expensive,
because of foreign exchange rates and higher price tiers for out-of-country
applicants. The situation has created a financial structure where foreign students particularly
those from China are subsidizing financial aid for U.S. students by paying the full
boat themselves, and sometimes at inflated prices, admissions experts say. Michigan State, for
That means that
thats not all.
example, had over 1,000 students from China in the entering class. All of these students were full-payers. Only a
very small group of schools in the U.S. provide need-based aid for international students, says Parke Muth, former
Dean of Admissions and Director of International Admission at the University of Virginia. They reserve money for
U.S. citizens first. The United States last year had more than 886,000 international students enrolled in colleges
across the country, according to Open Doors Report, from Institute of International Education. Thats almost double
the number of international students studying in the United States 20 years ago.
2AC Innovation
Warming
number of student visa applications for the United States has registered a 60 per
cent increase this year with a whopping 90,000 applicants, of whom only about
4,000 could make the cut. According to an official statement, around 4,000 students managed to get
The
student visa which saw over 90,000 applicants, a number which doubled at the US embassy and consulates,
especially in Mumbai and Hyderabad, over the last 12 months. "The US Embassy in Delhi, and Consulates General
in Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata, and Mumbai, opened their doors on today to over 4,000 Indian students who
the consulates treated the applicants to an informative morning in a festive, collegiate atmosphere, with the
consulates playing music ranging from college songs to pop music. "It
! Warming
Global Warming causes mass species extinction
Zielinski 15
(Sarah Zielinski, award-winning science writer and editor, Climate Change Will
Accelerate Earth's Sixth Mass Extinction, April 30 th, 2015, Smithsonian,
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/climate-change-will-accelerateearths-sixth-mass-extinction-180955138/?no-ist, JAS)
Climate change is accelerating species loss on Earth , and by the end of this century,
as many as one in six species could be at risk of extinction. But while these effects are being
seen around the world, the threat is much higher in certain sensitive regions, according to
two new comprehensive studies. The planet is experiencing a new wave of die-offs
driven by factors such as habitat loss, the introduction of exotic invaders and rapid
changes to our climate. Some people have called the phenomenon the sixth mass
extinction, on par with the catastrophic demise of the large dinosaurs 65 million
years ago. To try and combat the declines, scientists have been racing to make predictions about which species
are most likely to go extinct, along with when and where it will happen, sometimes with widely varying results.
Depending on which study you look at, you can come away with a rosy or gloomy view of climate change
extinctions, notes Mark Urban of the University of Connecticut. Thats because each study focuses on different
species [and] regions of the world and makes different assumptions about climate change and species responses.
one of the two new studies published today in Science, Urban compensated for all
those differences by combining 131 previously published studies into one big
prediction. If greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated, he calculates, 16
percent of species will be threatened with extinction due to climate change by the
end of the century. Perhaps most surprising is that extinction risk does not just
increase with temperature rise, but accelerates , curving upward as the Earth
warms, Urban says. If greenhouse gases were capped and temperatures rose a couple
degrees less, then the extinction threat would be nearly halved, he found. Urbans
In
analysis focused on major land areas (minus Antarctica) and found that the risk of die-offs was not equal around the
South America, Australia and New Zealand will experience the most
extinctions, probably because these regions have many species that are endemic
and found nowhere else in the world, and they rely on habitats that are not found
anywhere else. Ocean areas predicted to be at high risk of extinction (red) are
overlaid with areas most impacted by humans (black outline) and regions
experiencing a high rate of climate change (crosshatch) . (Finnegan et al, Science.) In the
world.
second study, Seth Finnegan of the University of California, Berkeley and colleagues drew from the fossil record to
make predictions about modern extinction risk in the worlds coastal areas. Extinction
is a process that
often plays out on very long timescalesthousands of years or more. But our direct
observations of modern species span, in even the best cases, only a few hundred
years, notes Finnegan. Fossils allow us to examine the entire histories of different groups, from their first
appearance until their final extinction. Finnegans group used the fossil histories of six groups of marine animals
bivalves, gastropods, sea urchins, sharks, mammals and stony coralsto determine which kinds of animals were
inherently more likely to disappear, or the intrinsic risk of extinction. Similar groups of species tend to have similar
patterns of extinction, Finnegan notes, which makes fossil studies such as this one possible. They team also
analyzed the geographic locations where such extinctions were more likely to occur. The researchers then overlaid
their map of intrinsic extinctions with data on today's human impacts and climate change to determine probable
They found that coastal species will be especially at risk near the
tropics, including the Indo-Pacific, the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico. The
implications of these broad-scale patterns for the future of coastal marine
ecosystems will depend on how intrinsic risk and current threats interact to
determine future extinction risk, the researchers note. In some places, such as the
hotspots of species loss.
North Atlantic, anthropogenic impacts may dwarf intrinsic risk effects and leave a
distinctly human fingerprint on future extinctions.
Competitiveness
36 graduate programs in
electrical engineering where the proportion of international students exceeds 80
percent, including seven where it exceeds 90. (The analysis is limited to those programs with at
higher proportions at many individual universities. For example, there are
least 30 full-time students.)International students help many universities have enough graduate students to
support research programs that help attract top faculty and that also thereby help U.S. students by having a higherquality program than they otherwise would have, said Stuart Anderson, NFAPs executive director and author of the
report.
society within the U.S. in terms of trying to push for more interest in STEM fields, said Jonathan Bredow, professor
and chair of the electrical engineering department at the University of Texas at Arlington, a program with more than
90 percent international enrollment. Domestic
At
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the proportion of international students
in graduate electrical engineering programs is 52.5 percent and, in computer
science, 35.3 percent. At Stanford, 56 percent of graduate electrical engineering students and 43.7 percent
of graduate computer science students are international. The report also emphasizes the value that
international students can bring to the U.S. economy after graduation as
researchers and entrepreneurs. Measures that would make it easier for STEM
graduate students to obtain visas to work in the U.S. after graduation measures
that many in higher education see as crucial to the U.S. maintaining its edge in
attracting international graduate students -- are pending in Congress (and are included in the
students,' but by definition there are only a few of those schools. Obviously everyone cant be MIT or Stanford."
comprehensive immigration bill recently passed by the Senate). "This report is very well-timed, said Julia Kent,
director of communications and advancement for the Council of Graduate Schools. Obviously, for the policy
reasons -- the pending legislation about STEM visas -- and second because there is data out there right now which
we have some cause for concern in this country about the flow of
international graduate students to the United States which we have always counted
on. There is now more competition for international graduate students . Other countries are
suggests that
developing policies to promote the influx of foreign students to their shores, and there are also ways in which the
current economy in the United States has reduced funding support for graduate students, which makes it more
difficult to attract students to U.S. programs with attractive funding packages. CGS data on applications to U.S.
graduate schools released in April show that total international applications grew by a meager 1 percent this year
and that there were actually drops in applications from certain key sending countries, including China (-5 percent),
South Korea (-13 percent) and Taiwan (-13 percent). On the plus side, applications from India increased 20 percent.
"It's too soon to know how this data will actually affect enrollments, but the preliminary data show that there is
some cause for concern, Kent said.
(Jenny Ung, student at Arizona State University, International students earn more
than half of advanced STEM degrees in the U.S., July 8 th, 2015, USA today,
http://college.usatoday.com/2015/07/08/international-students-stem-degrees/, JAS)
For Yashwanth Kumar, studying in America has always been his dream. After receiving his undergraduate degree at
Anna University in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, he is now a graduate student at Arizona State University pursuing a
University, also noticed that most of classmates were international students himself in his studies in pursuit of a
Masters in industrial engineering. RELATED: Philly organization brings STEM students out of the classroom, into the
job market plays a big role in these percentage rates. Companies and governments pay millions of dollars for
engineering research and solutions, which motivate the most talented people to see degrees in engineering, he
Baoum was not approached by a commissioned agent, he had heard of students who had. In Saudi Arabia, I heard
many times about university fairs where students could meet with American university representatives to learn
more about their universities, Baoum says. RELATED: Study Women preferred over men for STEM asst.
draws for international students, Kumar says. Especially students from India who make up a majority of the
population in any university next to China come here for engineering. Baoum explains that families often try to
encourage their children to study careers in STEM fields, especially engineering, while in America. I also think
many international students choose to study in America since they believe it is the
leading country to the world economy, he says. Also many of them have been
exposed to the American culture through movies so they would like to reach that
place where they used to see on TV. Its a cultural trend back in India that either we should be an
engineer or a doctor, Kumar says. We end up choosing engineering in the undergraduate studies, some by
passion, some without any choice and we pursue that goal.
Foreign students are considered technical brainpower, who often enroll in academic
programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics [*346] ( STEM). n11 Scholars and educators found
that among the major developed countries and the newly industrialized countries , the United States ranks
near the bottom in mathematics and science achievement among eighth graders .
n12 Therefore recruiting foreign students improves the overall quality of new
science and engineering Ph.D.s by drawing on a wider range of talented students
who become the key contributors in driving the knowledge-based economy . n13
According to a report by the Institute of International Education (IIE), more than one-third of Nobel
laureates from the United States are immigrants. n14 A study conducted by Chellaraj, Maskus,
and Mattoo highlighted that foreign graduate students are significant inputs into developing new technologies Page
undergraduate classes. n18 According to Borjas, these students [*347] play the same role in staffing the research
labs of American universities that Mexican illegal workers play in staffing the vast agricultural fields of California.
dependent on the high tuition fees paid by foreign students. n20 According to a 2005 study conducted by the
Institute of International Education, there were 565,039 international students studying in the United States, and
(Linda Rosen, CEO @ change the equation, The Truth Hurts: The STEM Crisis Is Not
a Myth, September 11th, 2013, Huffington Post,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-rosen/the-truth-hurts-the-stem_b_3900575.html, JAS)
Here we go again. Social media sites are buzzing with claims that there is no shortage of
U.S. workers in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). Last time this
happened, they were responding to a report from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), which has since been soundly
refuted. This time, it's an article in IEEE's Spectrum Magazine by Robert Charette, who proclaims that "the STEM
Like EPI, Charette is simply wrong. Charette suggests that people who
have a STEM background are down on their luck -- unable to find stable jobs,
making do with flat wages, or bailing out of STEM entirely . The STEM shortage "myth," he
crisis is a myth."
writes, was manufactured by a cabal of special interests who "cherry pick" data to keep themselves in business and
Yet Charette does a fair bit of cherry picking himself while missing
the big picture. He argues from anecdotes and a handful of studies that support his
point but leaves aside the mountain of data that demonstrate a shortage. More
important, he unwittingly points to one of the biggest causes of this shortage: Demand for STEM skills has
intensified across the entire economy. Not just crying wolf Charette limits his attention to
the demand for people to fill jobs in traditional STEM fields like technology or
healthcare. But even in those fields, demand is strong and growing. Rising demand
for STEM workers is in fact nothing new. A sidebar to Charette's article quotes 80
years' worth of warnings that a looming STEM crisis will hobble U.S. economic
growth. The clear implication of the sidebar is that the education and business leaders who have been making
depress STEM wages.
these warnings have been crying wolf since before the Second World War. But were their fears of a STEM shortage
really much ado about nothing? Hardly. The National Science Foundation ( NSF)
century recessions, it remains robust. NSF puts it at 20 percent between 2000 and 2010, a period during which the
overall workforce experienced little growth. And that robust growth will probably continue. Georgetown's Center on
Education and the Workforce predicts that the total number of STEM jobs will grow 26 percent between 2010 and
The Georgetown Center also projects that professional and technical jobs in
healthcare, which it doesn't include in its STEM numbers, will grow by 31 percent,
far faster than the workforce as a whole. (Charette criticizes a previous projection Georgetown
2020.
released in 2011 for not foreseeing the depth and duration of the recession, but he neglects to mention this more
recent projection, which appeared in June of this year.) It's nice to be in demand Even in recent years of slower
the data, which tell a dramatically different story : A Change the Equation study found that,
even in the sluggish years between 2009 and 2012, there were nearly two STEM-focused job postings
for every unemployed STEM professional. During those same years, unemployment in
STEM stood at just over 4 percent, well less than the 9.3 percent unemployment
rates for non-STEM workers. People in STEM jobs benefit from being in such high
demand. Study after study confirms that STEM professionals get paid more than non-STEM
professionals -- often much more -- even when you control for their education and
other factors. Contrary to Charette's claim that STEM wages have stagnated, reports
from Georgetown, the Commerce Department, and the Information Technology
Innovation Foundation show that they have risen faster than non-STEM wages, even
in recent years. That is a sign that employers are feeling the pinch. Of course, not every STEM
degree is a ticket to success. Charette is right to point out that people with PhDs in some sciences can have a tough
time finding a job that matches their degrees. But such jobs represent only a very small sliver of the STEM job
The fact that STEM jobs have fared so well even through the recession is
telling. If anything, demand will only intensify as the economy picks up. Don't forget
the STEM technicians! Charette does not address the high demand for a large category of STEM workers:
market.
those who have two-year degrees or certificates rather than bachelor's degrees or higher. In fact, he barely
acknowledges that such workers exist. "Of the 7.6 million STEM workers counted by the Commerce Department,
only 3.3 million possess STEM degrees," he writes. "If many STEM jobs can be filled by people who don't have a
STEM degree, then why the big push to get more students to pursue STEM?" Charette does not mention that, by
Commerce Department
report clearly indicates that the large majority of STEM workers who lack a
bachelor's degree in STEM actually lack a bachelor's degree in any subject. Instead,
most have 2-year degrees or certificates and do jobs that require nothing higher
than that. In fact, Jonathan Roswell of the Brookings Institution feels that studies like Commerce Department
report dramatically undercount such STEM jobs. By his reckoning, STEM workers with an associate's
degree or less account for 10 percent of the entire U.S. workforce . And don't
imagine for a moment that the jobs they do require only low skills. Roswell finds
that those jobs demand a "high level of knowledge" in STEM, and employers are
quick to pay a premium for that knowledge. He estimates that, on average, STEM
jobs that don't require a four-year degree pay 10 percent more than non-STEM jobs
with similar education requirements. Indeed, when business leaders in Change the Equation's
coalition talk about the STEM worker shortage, they are often referring to the
trouble they have finding qualified STEM workers below the bachelor's level. The
evidence is on their side. It's not just about "STEM Jobs" Anymore One major flaw in Charette's argument is
that he overlooks the growing demand for STEM skills beyond traditional STEM jobs . In
fact, what Charette sees as a sign of anemic demand for STEM professionals is quite
the opposite. He observes that people with STEM credentials are not staying in
STEM jobs, but that is only because they have strong job prospects well beyond the
traditional STEM fields. That does not mean that their STEM skills are going to waste. According to NSF,
two thirds of people with degrees in Science and Engineering who end up in jobs
outside of those fields report that their jobs are "closely or somewhat related" to
their degrees. Georgetown's 2011 report on STEM found that STEM professionals are hot
commodities in high-paying fields like finance and management, leaving many more
employers to compete for people in a limited pool of STEM talent . Again, employers are
willing to pay for that talent. People with STEM degrees who go into non-STEM jobs earn 12
percent more than those don't hold degrees in STEM. That wage premium drives
home the point that even non-STEM employers value STEM skills. STEM for all After making
"STEM degrees," he means bachelor's or advanced degrees in STEM. Yet the
such a spirited attack on claims of a STEM shortage, Charette devotes a scant concluding paragraph to what he
calls another "STEM crisis": "the fact that today's students are not receiving a solid grounding in science, math and
first century. Yet that crisis is at the heart of the STEM worker shortage. Employers
of all stripes are looking for people with strong STEM knowledge and skills, but the
U.S. talent pool is currently too shallow to meet their needs . The consequences of this
shortage are not merely economically devastating. They are devastating to the prospects of millions of low-income
and minority youth who have not received a solid grounding in STEM and therefore have almost no chance to enjoy
the benefits of a STEM career. For those youth in particular, the STEM crisis is unfortunately all too real.
As the US share of
the worlds S&E specialists falls, it is inevitable that the US share of papers will fall,
but there is no reason for numbers of papers to fall, given the increased numbers of journals.25 Similarly, as the
supply of S&E graduates has increased overseas, many high-tech
companies have begun to locate major research installations outside the
U.S. In 2004, the CEO of Cisco declared that Cisco is a Chinese company when he
announced that the firm was setting up its newest R&D facility in China. 26 One of
Microsofts major research facilities is in Beijing . OECD data shows a large increase
in U.S. outward R&D investment from 1994 to 2000. A 2004 survey of corporate
executives by the Intelligence Unit of The Economist found that the five top 9
countries in which firms intended to increase R&D outside of their home country
were China, the U.S., India, the UK, and Germany. The three most critically important factors
cited by executives when selecting R&D locales were local R&D expertise in your industry, followed by
availability of R&D scientists with appropriate skills, and cost of labour of R&D.27 As of mid 2004, the Chinese
government registered over 600 multinational research facilities in the country, many from large US
multinationals.28 By contrast, in 1997 China registered less than 50 multinational corporation research centers.
STEM K2 Comp
STEM directly links to US economy.
Pham and Triantis 15 [05/19/15 Nam D. Pham and Alexis J. Triantis, PhD in economics, Reaching the Full
Potential of STEM for Women and the U.S. Economy, http://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/reaching-full-potential-stemwomen-and-us-economy DA July 13, 15]
important middle management roles. That is the test bed; that is where you create new leaders. To populate that,
you need to have more women as new employees. There is no question that women are starting to enter
engineering programs at a much higher rate. If you are increasing the pool of new graduates who are women, that
will filter up. I think it is important to speed up the process a little bit.3 Gwynne Shotwell, President and Chief
While occupations are inherently dynamic and job responsibilities change over time, a major focus is placed on
STEM education as a means to increase innovation. Colleges and other post graduate
institutions are essential producers of skilled workers. Students from around the world travel to
the United States to attain a world-class education and training in STEM fields. An
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) study shows that
a strong relationship exists between human capital development and higher
education institutions, and that innovation clusters in regions highly concentrated
with skilled and creative workers.6 A formal STEM education leads to a higher degree
of critical thinking and an improvement in problem-solving skills.7 STEM education
helps instill an innovative mind-set that leads to creative new ventures and
increased economic growth. While women represent more than half of postsecondary enrollment and
graduates, they continue to be underrepresented in STEM education and STEM
occupations. This leaves an unfortunate gap that prevents the U.S. economy from reaching its full potential.
Public policies as well as private initiatives are needed more than ever to encourage women to enroll in STEM
education fields, and to ensure that they have the appropriate opportunities to pursue, and remain in, STEM
occupations.
U.S. currently enjoys a position among the worlds foremost innovative and
scientifically advanced economies but the emergence of new economic
powerhouses like China and India threatens to disrupt the global distribution of
innovation and economic competitiveness . Among U.S. policy makers, the promotion of
advanced education, particularly in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and
Mathematics) fields, has become a key strategy for ensuring the U.S.s position as
an innovative economic leader. Since approximately one third of science and engineering post-graduate
students in the U.S. are foreign born, the future of the U.S. STEM educational system is
intimately tied to issues of global competitiveness and American immigration policy. This study
utilizes a combination of national education data, a survey of foreign-born STEM graduate
students, and in-depth interviews of a sub-set of those students to explain how a
combination of scientists and engineers educational decisions, as well as their
experience in school, can predict a students career path and geographical location,
which can affect the long-term innovation environment in their home and
destination country. This study highlights the fact that the increasing global
competitiveness in STEM education and the complex, restrictive nature of U.S.
immigration policies are contributing to an environment where the American STEM
system may no longer be able to comfortably remain the premier destination for the
worlds top international students.
The
(Bart Gordon and Larry Bock, former Democratic Member of the House from
Tennessee and executive director of the USA Science & Engineering Festival,
Gordon, Bock: STEM Education Is Key to a Competitive America, April 27 th, 2012,
Rollcall, http://www.rollcall.com/news/Gordon-Bock-STEM-Education-Is-Key-to-aCompetitive-America-214160-1.html, JAS)
America is facing a crisis of competitiveness on the global stage . Our nation is
not developing a generation of students pursuing science careers or retaining the
talents of the non-U.S. citizens who now earn more than two-thirds of Ph.D. degrees
awarded by American colleges and universities. Fewer young Americans are entering fields of
science, technology, engineering and mathematics, putting the nations status as an innovative
world leader in severe jeopardy. Each year since 2008, the majority of patents issued by the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office have been awarded to international owners. Inspiring young Americans to study STEM fields is
critical to reversing this trend and creating a new generation of innovative entrepreneurs. That is why the USA
Science and Engineering Festival the nations largest celebration of science and engineering, to be held April 28-
29 at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center was created. This weekend, hundreds of thousands of
participants will gather at the Washington Convention Center for what promises to be Americas largest celebration
of science. In his 2010 State of the Union address, President Barack Obama said, The
Education and society mutually influence each other . United States education is an important
policy arena, and educational policy is shaped by the U.S. federal government. The educational system is
decentralized, and power and authority are shared among three levels: federal, state, and local (Wong 2005).
Immigration law is governed by federal regulations and policies that need to be scrutinized and critically understood
at all times. I started this research with some facts: 1 .
! China
Specifically, US decline in economic competitiveness triggers
US-Sino hegemony warits the tipping pointdeterrence
solves conflict now, but US power is slipping through various
conflicts
Lampton 15 (David M. Lampton, Hyman Professor and Director of SAIS-China and China Studies at the
Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, A Tipping Point in U.S.-China Relations is Upon Us, USChina Perception Monitor, 11 May 2015, http://www.uscnpm.org/blog/2015/05/11/a-tipping-point-in-u-s-chinarelations-is-upon-us-part-i/
The trend in domestic discourse in both China and the United States over the last fifteen years
has been from engagement, to a light hedge, to a heavy hedge, and increasingly toward deterrence.
Deterrence vocabulary leads to discussions of threat, will, capability, second-strike, and credibility. This is a far
different vocabulary than the one that generally was employed during the last forty years. What worries me greatly
is the gradual migration of the center of gravity of elite and popular discussion in
both nations toward more extreme analyses and policy recommendations that
simply feed one another. Past policy has not collapsed, but it is weakening. Underlying
Causes of these Policy Tendencies So, what are the underlying causes of these phenomena? First, the diffuse
(though never universally shared) sense in America since 1978 that China generally was
going in a positive direction in terms of societal and governance trends, economic
policy, and international citizenship is seriously eroding in the U nited States, not least
among policy elites. Confidence that a growing middle class, exposure to the world, and
integration with it would produce growing value and/or interest convergence over
time is challenged by the PRCs perceived domestic political tightening and
muscularity abroad. In the security realm, waning confidence that China is going in
a positive direction means that the hope that economic interdependence
would produce tolerable security cooperation increasingly is questioned,
despite some recent progress in military-to-military ties and other important issues. In the last few years an almost
imperceptible tipping point nearly has been reached with respect to U.S. assessments of Chinas internal and
external policy direction. I should say, certain domestic economic initiatives seem quite positive. Another
tipping point consideration is power. Until the new millennium the United States
was relatively secure in its position as the sole economic and military superpower.
This sense of security has gradually eroded under the combined weight of 9/11, the
Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, the 2008 global financial crisis, partisan gridlock at
home, and Chinese activities and responses in Northeast, East, and Southeast Asia
since 2010. Meanwhile, the PRC has had its post-WTO entry growth spurt,
weathered the 2008 global financial crisis in relatively good shape, and has become
the leading trade partner of nearly every country in Asiasurpassing Japan as the
worlds second largest economy. Chinese leaders and citizens alike, it seems to me,
rapidly came to expect that their mounting comprehensive national power would
give them new-found status and influence in the international system and provide
Beijing added leverage to achieve more favorable outcomes on core issues, as well
as give China a bigger say in the institutions of global governance such as the IMF.
When others, such as Japan, Vietnam, and Philippines were perceived to have taken actions jeopardizing Chinese
Aerospace
36 graduate programs in
electrical engineering where the proportion of international students exceeds 80
percent, including seven where it exceeds 90. (The analysis is limited to those programs with at
higher proportions at many individual universities. For example, there are
least 30 full-time students.)International students help many universities have enough graduate students to
support research programs that help attract top faculty and that also thereby help U.S. students by having a higherquality program than they otherwise would have, said Stuart Anderson, NFAPs executive director and author of the
report.
society within the U.S. in terms of trying to push for more interest in STEM fields, said Jonathan Bredow, professor
and chair of the electrical engineering department at the University of Texas at Arlington, a program with more than
90 percent international enrollment. Domestic
At
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the proportion of international students
in graduate electrical engineering programs is 52.5 percent and, in computer
science, 35.3 percent. At Stanford, 56 percent of graduate electrical engineering students and 43.7 percent
of graduate computer science students are international. The report also emphasizes the value that
international students can bring to the U.S. economy after graduation as
researchers and entrepreneurs. Measures that would make it easier for STEM
graduate students to obtain visas to work in the U.S. after graduation measures
that many in higher education see as crucial to the U.S. maintaining its edge in
attracting international graduate students -- are pending in Congress (and are included in the
students,' but by definition there are only a few of those schools. Obviously everyone cant be MIT or Stanford."
comprehensive immigration bill recently passed by the Senate). "This report is very well-timed, said Julia Kent,
director of communications and advancement for the Council of Graduate Schools. Obviously, for the policy
reasons -- the pending legislation about STEM visas -- and second because there is data out there right now which
we have some cause for concern in this country about the flow of
international graduate students to the United States which we have always counted
on. There is now more competition for international graduate students . Other countries are
suggests that
developing policies to promote the influx of foreign students to their shores, and there are also ways in which the
current economy in the United States has reduced funding support for graduate students, which makes it more
difficult to attract students to U.S. programs with attractive funding packages. CGS data on applications to U.S.
graduate schools released in April show that total international applications grew by a meager 1 percent this year
and that there were actually drops in applications from certain key sending countries, including China (-5 percent),
South Korea (-13 percent) and Taiwan (-13 percent). On the plus side, applications from India increased 20 percent.
"It's too soon to know how this data will actually affect enrollments, but the preliminary data show that there is
some cause for concern, Kent said.
(Jenny Ung, student at Arizona State University, International students earn more
than half of advanced STEM degrees in the U.S., July 8 th, 2015, USA today,
http://college.usatoday.com/2015/07/08/international-students-stem-degrees/, JAS)
For Yashwanth Kumar, studying in America has always been his dream. After receiving his undergraduate degree at
Anna University in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, he is now a graduate student at Arizona State University pursuing a
University, also noticed that most of classmates were international students himself in his studies in pursuit of a
Masters in industrial engineering. RELATED: Philly organization brings STEM students out of the classroom, into the
job market plays a big role in these percentage rates. Companies and governments pay millions of dollars for
engineering research and solutions, which motivate the most talented people to see degrees in engineering, he
Baoum was not approached by a commissioned agent, he had heard of students who had. In Saudi Arabia, I heard
many times about university fairs where students could meet with American university representatives to learn
more about their universities, Baoum says. RELATED: Study Women preferred over men for STEM asst.
draws for international students, Kumar says. Especially students from India who make up a majority of the
population in any university next to China come here for engineering. Baoum explains that families often try to
encourage their children to study careers in STEM fields, especially engineering, while in America. I also think
many international students choose to study in America since they believe it is the
leading country to the world economy, he says. Also many of them have been
exposed to the American culture through movies so they would like to reach that
place where they used to see on TV. Its a cultural trend back in India that either we should be an
engineer or a doctor, Kumar says. We end up choosing engineering in the undergraduate studies, some by
passion, some without any choice and we pursue that goal.
Foreign students are considered technical brainpower, who often enroll in academic
programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics [*346] ( STEM). n11 Scholars and educators found
that among the major developed countries and the newly industrialized countries , the United States ranks
near the bottom in mathematics and science achievement among eighth graders .
n12 Therefore recruiting foreign students improves the overall quality of new
science and engineering Ph.D.s by drawing on a wider range of talented students
who become the key contributors in driving the knowledge-based economy . n13
According to a report by the Institute of International Education (IIE), more than one-third of Nobel
laureates from the United States are immigrants. n14 A study conducted by Chellaraj, Maskus,
and Mattoo highlighted that foreign graduate students are significant inputs into developing new technologies Page
undergraduate classes. n18 According to Borjas, these students [*347] play the same role in staffing the research
labs of American universities that Mexican illegal workers play in staffing the vast agricultural fields of California.
dependent on the high tuition fees paid by foreign students. n20 According to a 2005 study conducted by the
Institute of International Education, there were 565,039 international students studying in the United States, and
(Linda Rosen, CEO @ change the equation, The Truth Hurts: The STEM Crisis Is Not
a Myth, September 11th, 2013, Huffington Post,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-rosen/the-truth-hurts-the-stem_b_3900575.html, JAS)
Here we go again. Social media sites are buzzing with claims that there is no shortage of
U.S. workers in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). Last time this
happened, they were responding to a report from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), which has since been soundly
refuted. This time, it's an article in IEEE's Spectrum Magazine by Robert Charette, who proclaims that "the STEM
Like EPI, Charette is simply wrong. Charette suggests that people who
have a STEM background are down on their luck -- unable to find stable jobs,
making do with flat wages, or bailing out of STEM entirely . The STEM shortage "myth," he
crisis is a myth."
writes, was manufactured by a cabal of special interests who "cherry pick" data to keep themselves in business and
Yet Charette does a fair bit of cherry picking himself while missing
the big picture. He argues from anecdotes and a handful of studies that support his
point but leaves aside the mountain of data that demonstrate a shortage. More
important, he unwittingly points to one of the biggest causes of this shortage: Demand for STEM skills has
intensified across the entire economy. Not just crying wolf Charette limits his attention to
the demand for people to fill jobs in traditional STEM fields like technology or
healthcare. But even in those fields, demand is strong and growing. Rising demand
for STEM workers is in fact nothing new. A sidebar to Charette's article quotes 80
years' worth of warnings that a looming STEM crisis will hobble U.S. economic
growth. The clear implication of the sidebar is that the education and business leaders who have been making
depress STEM wages.
these warnings have been crying wolf since before the Second World War. But were their fears of a STEM shortage
really much ado about nothing? Hardly. The National Science Foundation ( NSF)
century recessions, it remains robust. NSF puts it at 20 percent between 2000 and 2010, a period during which the
overall workforce experienced little growth. And that robust growth will probably continue. Georgetown's Center on
Education and the Workforce predicts that the total number of STEM jobs will grow 26 percent between 2010 and
The Georgetown Center also projects that professional and technical jobs in
healthcare, which it doesn't include in its STEM numbers, will grow by 31 percent,
far faster than the workforce as a whole. (Charette criticizes a previous projection Georgetown
2020.
released in 2011 for not foreseeing the depth and duration of the recession, but he neglects to mention this more
recent projection, which appeared in June of this year.) It's nice to be in demand Even in recent years of slower
the data, which tell a dramatically different story : A Change the Equation study found that,
even in the sluggish years between 2009 and 2012, there were nearly two STEM-focused job postings
for every unemployed STEM professional. During those same years, unemployment in
STEM stood at just over 4 percent, well less than the 9.3 percent unemployment
rates for non-STEM workers. People in STEM jobs benefit from being in such high
demand. Study after study confirms that STEM professionals get paid more than non-STEM
professionals -- often much more -- even when you control for their education and
other factors. Contrary to Charette's claim that STEM wages have stagnated, reports
from Georgetown, the Commerce Department, and the Information Technology
Innovation Foundation show that they have risen faster than non-STEM wages, even
in recent years. That is a sign that employers are feeling the pinch. Of course, not every STEM
degree is a ticket to success. Charette is right to point out that people with PhDs in some sciences can have a tough
time finding a job that matches their degrees. But such jobs represent only a very small sliver of the STEM job
The fact that STEM jobs have fared so well even through the recession is
telling. If anything, demand will only intensify as the economy picks up. Don't forget
the STEM technicians! Charette does not address the high demand for a large category of STEM workers:
market.
those who have two-year degrees or certificates rather than bachelor's degrees or higher. In fact, he barely
acknowledges that such workers exist. "Of the 7.6 million STEM workers counted by the Commerce Department,
only 3.3 million possess STEM degrees," he writes. "If many STEM jobs can be filled by people who don't have a
STEM degree, then why the big push to get more students to pursue STEM?" Charette does not mention that, by
Commerce Department
report clearly indicates that the large majority of STEM workers who lack a
bachelor's degree in STEM actually lack a bachelor's degree in any subject. Instead,
most have 2-year degrees or certificates and do jobs that require nothing higher
than that. In fact, Jonathan Roswell of the Brookings Institution feels that studies like Commerce Department
report dramatically undercount such STEM jobs. By his reckoning, STEM workers with an associate's
degree or less account for 10 percent of the entire U.S. workforce . And don't
imagine for a moment that the jobs they do require only low skills. Roswell finds
that those jobs demand a "high level of knowledge" in STEM, and employers are
quick to pay a premium for that knowledge. He estimates that, on average, STEM
jobs that don't require a four-year degree pay 10 percent more than non-STEM jobs
with similar education requirements. Indeed, when business leaders in Change the Equation's
coalition talk about the STEM worker shortage, they are often referring to the
trouble they have finding qualified STEM workers below the bachelor's level. The
evidence is on their side. It's not just about "STEM Jobs" Anymore One major flaw in Charette's argument is
that he overlooks the growing demand for STEM skills beyond traditional STEM jobs . In
fact, what Charette sees as a sign of anemic demand for STEM professionals is quite
the opposite. He observes that people with STEM credentials are not staying in
STEM jobs, but that is only because they have strong job prospects well beyond the
traditional STEM fields. That does not mean that their STEM skills are going to waste. According to NSF,
two thirds of people with degrees in Science and Engineering who end up in jobs
outside of those fields report that their jobs are "closely or somewhat related" to
their degrees. Georgetown's 2011 report on STEM found that STEM professionals are hot
commodities in high-paying fields like finance and management, leaving many more
employers to compete for people in a limited pool of STEM talent . Again, employers are
willing to pay for that talent. People with STEM degrees who go into non-STEM jobs earn 12
percent more than those don't hold degrees in STEM. That wage premium drives
home the point that even non-STEM employers value STEM skills. STEM for all After making
"STEM degrees," he means bachelor's or advanced degrees in STEM. Yet the
such a spirited attack on claims of a STEM shortage, Charette devotes a scant concluding paragraph to what he
calls another "STEM crisis": "the fact that today's students are not receiving a solid grounding in science, math and
first century. Yet that crisis is at the heart of the STEM worker shortage. Employers
of all stripes are looking for people with strong STEM knowledge and skills, but the
U.S. talent pool is currently too shallow to meet their needs . The consequences of this
shortage are not merely economically devastating. They are devastating to the prospects of millions of low-income
and minority youth who have not received a solid grounding in STEM and therefore have almost no chance to enjoy
the benefits of a STEM career. For those youth in particular, the STEM crisis is unfortunately all too real.
As the US share of
the worlds S&E specialists falls, it is inevitable that the US share of papers will fall,
but there is no reason for numbers of papers to fall, given the increased numbers of journals.25 Similarly, as the
supply of S&E graduates has increased overseas, many high-tech
companies have begun to locate major research installations outside the
U.S. In 2004, the CEO of Cisco declared that Cisco is a Chinese company when he
announced that the firm was setting up its newest R&D facility in China. 26 One of
Microsofts major research facilities is in Beijing . OECD data shows a large increase
in U.S. outward R&D investment from 1994 to 2000. A 2004 survey of corporate
executives by the Intelligence Unit of The Economist found that the five top 9
countries in which firms intended to increase R&D outside of their home country
were China, the U.S., India, the UK, and Germany. The three most critically important factors
cited by executives when selecting R&D locales were local R&D expertise in your industry, followed by
availability of R&D scientists with appropriate skills, and cost of labour of R&D.27 As of mid 2004, the Chinese
government registered over 600 multinational research facilities in the country, many from large US
multinationals.28 By contrast, in 1997 China registered less than 50 multinational corporation research centers.
STEM K2 Aerospace
Increased STEM is critical to the Aerospace industry
Smith 14
(Ernie Smith, social media journalist for Associations Now, THE AEROSPACE
INDUSTRY'S BIG CHALLENGE: ATTRACTING YOUNG PEOPLE, September 17 th, 2014,
associations now, http://associationsnow.com/2014/09/aerospace-industrys-bigchallenge-attracting-young-people/?utm_source=AN%2BDaily
%2BNews&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20140918%2BThursday, JAS)
In recent comments by its leader, the Aerospace Industries Association admits that its
struggling to encourage diversity in its field, on top of getting younger generations
interested in the first place. Its not without ideas, however, as its annual contest proves. Youd think the
aerospace industrythe field that literally designs aircraft and rockets, among other thingswould sell itself to kids
in the U.S. But its not proving quite so easy, according to the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), which is
While foreign workers tend to be skilled enough to join the American workforce, the current rules require that much
of the design work done for U.S. military systems be done by U.S. citizens.
Economy
data on the contributions made by foreign students. The team was led by Keith Maskus, professor of economics at
the University of Colorado in Boulder. My interest was piqued quite a long time ago after September 11th, 2001.
interesting, but do we really know if thats true? So Maskus, along with Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak of Yale and Eric
Stuen of the University of Idaho, gathered data a lot of data. So what we did is got very detailed individual-level
data on quite a large number of students over 750,00 students, in fact who had come to get Ph.Ds in the 100
top science and engineering universities in the United States from the late 1970s to the late 1990s. And we had
information about where they came from, [including] what their visa status was, what area they wrote their
people can get together and bounce ideas off each other the sort of outcome of that is more dynamic intellectual
process. And you get more ideas with having some diversity like that, he said. To get a U.S. visa, he said, students
must demonstrate that either they or their family has enough money to pay for a substantial portion of their
education. Thats even if the students education is paid for by a scholarship .
find a local employer, wholl work on their behalf to get a temporary visa . That does
have the effect, were convinced, of pushing too many of these innovative people back
outside the borders of the United States . So we argue for increasing the number of
those visas and focusing on these students -- or even better -- just offering a very
quick and straightforward process to permanent residence , he said. In their article in the
journal Science, the authors say any innovation and economic growth gains would far
outweigh any diminished job prospects for American workers .
jobs, under the optional practical training (OPT) program, in the regions where they studied. OPT allows foreign
students on F-1 visas to work between 12 and 29 months after they graduate from a U.S. higher educational
institution. New York and Honolulu had the highest percentage (75 percent) of graduates working for a local
employer. Seattle, Miami and Las Vegas also ranked high for students who remained in their areas to work after
graduating. The metro areas with the fewest students who stayed in the area are Erie, PA; Binghamton, NY and
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX. Foreign
the continued growth in international students coming to the U.S. for higher
education had a significant positive economic impact on the United States.
International students contributed more than $27 billion to the U.S. economy,
according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Primary source of funding for
international students Open Doors 2014 reports that about 74 percent of all
international students receive the majority of their funds from sources outside of the
United States, including personal and family sources as well as assistance from their
home country governments or universities. Students from around the world who
study in the United States also contribute to America's scientific and technical research
and bring international perspectives into U.S. classrooms, helping prepare American
undergraduates for global careers, and often lead to longer-term business
relationships and economic benefits. Additional breakdowns of economic impact by state and
In 2014,
Congressional District, calculated using Open Doors enrollment figures, are available on the NAFSA International
Student Economic Value Tool website.
As reported by a recent article in Time Magazine, "The Big Test for Chinese
Students, the total number of Chinese students in the U.S. reached more than
270,000 in 2013-14, up 16.5% year on year. Chinese students now account for 31%
of foreign students in the U.S. - the largest group by far. Even Chinas President Xi
Jinpings daughter attended Harvard. A broader applicant pool gives admissions
officers more choice and schools more diversity. And international students tend to
pay higher tuition than their American counterparts. Chinese students in U.S.
colleges and universities contributed about $8 billion to the U.S. economy last year,
according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Though the article mostly focuses
on the admissions process and test score issues that Chinese students encounter
when coming to the U.S., it clearly offers some other enlightening facts and
statistics.
International students are key to US education.
Indiana University 14
The 886,052 international students and their families at universities and colleges
across the country supported 340,000 jobs and contributed $26.8 billion to
the U.S. economy during the 2013-2014 academic year, according to 2014 NAFSA
findings. This is a 8.5% increase in job support and creation, and a nearly 12%
increase in dollars contributed to the economy from the previous academic year.
Each year, NAFSA produces a detailed regional, state-by-state, and congressional
district analysis on the economic benefits of spending by international students and
their dependents to the U.S. economy. International students not only contribute
economic value, they build bridges between the United States and other
countries; bring global perspectives into U.S. classrooms and research labs;
support U.S. innovation through science and engineering coursework, making it
possible for U.S. colleges and universities to offer these courses to U.S. students;
and support programming and services on campus for all students by
paying out-of-state tuition, funded largely by non-U.S. sources . Use the tool below
to explore detailed breakdowns of the data and analysis, including new data on the
number of jobs created/supported.
(Tom Lindsay, covers Higher education and culture for forbes, To STEM Or Not To
STEM? That Is Not The Question, April 30th, 2015, Forbes,
http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomlindsay/2015/04/30/to-stem-or-not-to-stem-that-isnot-the-question/2/, JAS)
Fareed Zakaria, a writer for the Washington Post as well as a CNN host, believes that
America has an unhealthy obsession with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics) education. Americas last bipartisan cause is this, he writes, A liberal education is irrelevant, and
technical training is the new path forward. It is the only way, we are told, to ensure that Americans survive in an
age defined by technology and shaped by global competition. Without denying that science and technology are
crucial components of education, Zakaria warns nonetheless, This dismissal of broad-based learning, however,
comes from a fundamental misreading of the factsand puts America on a dangerously narrow path for the future.
According to Zakaria, the STEM-surge will destroy the kind of teaching that
has helped this country lead the world in economic dynamism, innovation and
entrepreneurship. What kind of teaching? A broad general education, which helps foster critical thinking
Why?
and creativity. Such an education, he urges, along with an optimistic outlook, helps Americans go on to
outperform the rest of the world economically despite the fact that our students score relatively poorly compared to
For
these reasons, he warns us against try[ing] to mimic Asian educational systems,
which are oriented around memorization and test-taking. Japan may have students
with stronger math and science skills, but you still need to know how to learn,
think, and even write, because, in the final count, critical thinking is the only way
to protect American jobs. I agree fully with Zakarias assertion of the primacy of
critical thinking. But does he prove his case that an increasing emphasis on STEM
education will undermine students critical faculty? Lloyd Bentsen IV, of the Dallas-based
other OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) nations in math, science, and reading.
National Center for Policy Analysis, thinks not. In a recent piece, he argues that, if Fareed Zakaria has his way, the
United States education system will continue to fail our children. Bentsen is more concerned than is Zakaria with
American students low scores in international comparisons. In 2012, Bentsen reports, American students ranked
36th among developed countries in mathematics; in science, U.S. students scored below the average. Moreover,
citing U.S. Commerce Department statistics, Bentsen informs us that STEM-job creation has outpaced non-STEM
jobs by a rate of 3-to-1 over the past ten years. STEM jobs abound todaythere are 277,000 job vacancies, and it
is estimated that there could be 2.4 million vacancies by 2018. These factors, Bentsen concludes, explain why the
growing STEM movement had been called the answer to poverty, gender discrimination and unemployment. For
him, then, encouraging our children to pursue STEM fields seems like a no-brainer. Whos right? While there is
no contesting Bentsens statistics, neither should we doubt Zakarias emphasis on the importance of critical
thinking. But in trying to address Zakarias fear that an increased focus on STEM fields will undermine critical
thinking, we need first to ask how effectively American higher education promotes critical thinking now. For the
answer, we have the landmark national study of collegiate learning, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on
from the Adrift study call Zakarias thesis into question. Adrift finds that Students
majoring in
traditional liberal-arts fields, including social science, humanities, natural
science, and mathematics, demonstrated significantly higher gains in
critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing skills over time than
students in other fields of study (emphasis added). It is not the sciences and
mathematics that undermine critical thinking, as Zakaria fears. Far from it. Instead,
Adrift finds that Students majoring in business, education, social work, and
communications had the lowest measurable gains. For anyone familiar with the late Allan
Blooms 1987 blockbusterThe Closing of the American Mind: How Higher Education Has Failed Democracy and
Impoverished the Souls of Todays Studentsperhaps
! China
Specifically, US economic decline triggers US-Sino hegemony
warits the tipping pointdeterrence solves conflict now, but
US power is slipping through various conflicts
Lampton 15 (David M. Lampton, Hyman Professor and Director of SAIS-China and China Studies at the
Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, A Tipping Point in U.S.-China Relations is Upon Us, USChina Perception Monitor, 11 May 2015, http://www.uscnpm.org/blog/2015/05/11/a-tipping-point-in-u-s-chinarelations-is-upon-us-part-i/
The trend in domestic discourse in both China and the United States over the last fifteen years
has been from engagement, to a light hedge, to a heavy hedge, and increasingly toward deterrence.
Deterrence vocabulary leads to discussions of threat, will, capability, second-strike, and credibility. This is a far
different vocabulary than the one that generally was employed during the last forty years. What worries me greatly
is the gradual migration of the center of gravity of elite and popular discussion in
both nations toward more extreme analyses and policy recommendations that
simply feed one another. Past policy has not collapsed, but it is weakening. Underlying
Causes of these Policy Tendencies So, what are the underlying causes of these phenomena? First, the diffuse
(though never universally shared) sense in America since 1978 that China generally was
going in a positive direction in terms of societal and governance trends, economic
policy, and international citizenship is seriously eroding in the U nited States, not least
among policy elites. Confidence that a growing middle class, exposure to the world, and
integration with it would produce growing value and/or interest convergence over
time is challenged by the PRCs perceived domestic political tightening and
muscularity abroad. In the security realm, waning confidence that China is going in
a positive direction means that the hope that economic interdependence
would produce tolerable security cooperation increasingly is questioned,
despite some recent progress in military-to-military ties and other important issues. In the last few years an almost
imperceptible tipping point nearly has been reached with respect to U.S. assessments of Chinas internal and
external policy direction. I should say, certain domestic economic initiatives seem quite positive. Another
tipping point consideration is power. Until the new millennium the United States
was relatively secure in its position as the sole economic and military superpower.
This sense of security has gradually eroded under the combined weight of 9/11, the
Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, the 2008 global financial crisis, partisan gridlock at
home, and Chinese activities and responses in Northeast, East, and Southeast Asia
since 2010. Meanwhile, the PRC has had its post-WTO entry growth spurt,
weathered the 2008 global financial crisis in relatively good shape, and has become
the leading trade partner of nearly every country in Asiasurpassing Japan as the
worlds second largest economy. Chinese leaders and citizens alike, it seems to me,
rapidly came to expect that their mounting comprehensive national power would
give them new-found status and influence in the international system and provide
Beijing added leverage to achieve more favorable outcomes on core issues, as well
as give China a bigger say in the institutions of global governance such as the IMF.
When others, such as Japan, Vietnam, and Philippines were perceived to have taken actions jeopardizing Chinese
2AC ISIS
SEVIS K2 discrimination
US policy just re-enforces Islamophobia
Ahmadi 11, Shafiqa Ahmadi, J.D., is an Assistant Professor of Clinical Education at the Rossier School of
Education at the University of Southern California. The Erosion of Civil Rights: Exploring the Effects of the Patriot
Act on Muslims in American Higher Education", 12 Rutgers Race & L. Rev. 1, 2011,
<https://www.academia.edu/475628/The_Erosion_of_Civil_Rights_Exploring_the_Effects_of_the_Patriot_Act_on_
Muslims_in_American_Higher_Education> //ak
communities whose members one might assume would reject the abject Islamophobic racialization of Muslims as
professor asserted that Islam "is founded on bellicose conquest, contempt for infidels ..." and implied American
Muslims are imminently violent, but merely attempting to camouflage into American society. n260 Varadarajan's
controversial editorial has sparked an intense backlash, but was not unique in espousing anti-Muslim sentiments in
Muslims and people of Middle Eastern descent generally, or to Muslims in institutions of higher education. n262
However, critics of the Patriot Act argue that Muslims and people of Middle Eastern and Southeast Asian descent are
the
Patriot Act, in the name of national security, enforces discrimination based on
ethnicity and religious beliefs and relieves the American people of any sense of
responsibility for their Islamophobic acts. n264 In large part, the Patriot Act has begun redefining
its target and that the Patriot Act justifies their maltreatment. n263 More importantly, critics argue that
patriotism post 9/11. n265 There are four sections of the Patriot Act that are of particular interest in examining the
effects on Muslims. Not because the Patriot Act specifically targets Muslims, but because it has a disparate impact
on Muslims generally and on Muslims within institutions of higher education specifically. Outlined in detail in Part I,
the four sections of the Patriot Act that have a disparate impact on Muslims in American higher education are: 1)
Section 217, 2) Section 411, 3) Section 505, and 4) Section 507. Complications resulting from adherence to these
sections have led to the following three problems within American higher education institutions: 1) anti-Muslim and
Islamophobic acts, 2) increased searches and seizures, and 3) bias and [*50] discrimination in educational
policymaking.
When international students and scholars do successfully obtain [*14] visas, they then must
deal with the requirements of the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) enacted after 9/11. n61
SEVIS is an electronic database that is required for all colleges and universities that
accept international students and scholar s. n62 SEVIS "collects and maintains pertinent information
on nonimmigrant students and exchange visitors, [their spouses], and the schools and exchange visitor sponsors
additional forms disclosing private information about themselves, their families, and their activities. n65 Not only
SEVIS requirements difficult to understand, time consuming, and an intrusion into the private lives of
international students and scholars, they also jeopardize the safety and security of
international students and scholars. Despite claims that SEVIS is a secure database, in 2005, "a
hacker broke into a University of Nevada at Las Vegas online databas e for ... SEVIS and
gained access to personal information for about 5,000 current and former
international students and scholars." n66 The stolen information consisted of names, [*15] "birth
dates, passport numbers, Social Security numbers [,]" and other sensitive information about the
international students, their spouses, and families. n67 Other universities that have faced similar problems
include University of Kansas, Boston College, and California State University at
Chico. n68
are
about life in America." n280 Mark D. Rentz, Associate Director of the American
Language and Culture Program at Arizona State University , has spent years researching
American-educated world leaders. n281 He wrote letters to American universities and foreign
embassies in order to obtain the names of their most "illustrious alumni." n282 After
obtaining three thousand names, Rentz wrote letters to those world leaders. n283 Since then,
many leaders have answered Rentz's request to recount their stories about studying
in the United States. n284 According to Rentz, "All acknowledged how useful their American
education has been to them. But what really stands out, what they remember most
fondly, are all the relationships and experiences they had with people. These
friendships left the greatest impression." n285 [*835] Aside from losing the opportunity
to educate future world leaders, the new immigration policies are putting a
strain on diplomatic relationships. In late December 2002, Deputy Prime Minister
Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi of Malaysia questioned the visa issuance
problems in a meeting with top United States officials in Washington D.C. n286 His
concern was about the many Malaysian students who had been accepted to
American universities but had not received visas. n287 The Patriot Act's impact will be more
noticeable in years to come when future leaders of the world will fail to comprehend the American way of life simply
Gretchen Mielke, Program of Study: Comparative and Regional Studies, Asia, Concentration: International Communication; Lauren Moloney-
Egnatios, Program of Study: International Communications, Concentration: International Education and Exchange and Intercultural Training, Julie Trinh, Program of Study: Comparative
and Regional Studies, East/Southeast Asia, Concentration: Foreign Policy and Security; Monika Young, Program of Study: Comparative and Regional Studies, Concentration: Europe
(regional concentration), Foreign Policy (topic concentration), The International Student Journey in the United States and The Netherlands: A Comparative Analysis , American
University School of International Service, May 5, 2014, https://www.american.edu/sis/practica/upload/Mueller-International-Student-House-Report.pdf
Helena Finns article, The Case for Cultural Diplomacy, indicated the importance
of international students in U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War era. Finn stated
that, [U.S] policymakers understood the link between engagement with foreign
audiences and victory over ideological enemie s and considered cultural diplomacy
vital to U.S. national security.17 Philip Altbach and Norman Uphoffs 1973 book, The
Student Internationals, described an era where the Soviet Union and the Un ited States
both valued international students as an important audience for public diplomacy
outreach efforts. Exchanges helped international students gain training and
experience to become future diplomats or government officials. 18 In addition,
international exchanges served to influence future elites of various countries. 19
While Finn indicated that U.S. officials no longer placed the same value on
international students in diplomacy and national security at the end of the Cold War ,
she advocated for their renewed role in fostering long-term, deeper understanding
and favorable opinions of the United States. 20
Yet the question remains as to when this resource for public diplomacy will be fully realized by the nation-state? City Diplomacy and International
Students While public diplomacy has historically been the exclusive domain of nation-states, authors such as Michele Acuto, Ana Rold, Richard Faber and Benjamin Barber track the emergence of the city as a key player in global affairs. In fact, Benjamin Barber argued that the twenty-first century is the century
of city diplomacy.21 In If Mayors Ruled the World, Barber suggested that nation-states thwart democracys globalization, inhibiting solidarity, creativity and cross-border collaboration.22 Barber looked to cities (such as Washington, D.C. or The Hague) because successful cities are ones that are open,
international, really promote tolerance and intercultural dialogue. Through this, they also promote creativity, promote opportunities to increase their exports, and have better chances to understand the culture of customers.23 Thus cities, which house more than 78% of the developing world, are conduits for
rewriting the social contract towards greater collaboration and pragmatism.24 Cities foster a strong, networked civil society with bottom-up citizenship.25 Cities can make decisions and take action when states cannot. 26 While cities cannot challenge the direct sovereignty of their nation state, their informal
power can flourish, inspiring neighborly affection, cross-border communication, trade, mobility and immigration, [which they rely on for] their vitality and survival.27 As a result, Barber stated, to say that mayors should rule the world is really to say that citizens should rule the world.28 Cities operate as
people and communities in the United States and around the world that are
necessary to solve global challenges.29
Diplomacy K2 Terror
Efective diplomacy in the Middle East key to isolate and
counter ISIS
Katulis, Lang, and Singh 14 Brian Katulis is a Senior Fellow at American Progress, where his
work focuses on U.S. national security policy in the Middle East and South Asia. Katulis has served as a consultant
to numerous U.S. government on projects in Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Egypt.From 1995 to 1998, he
lived and worked in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and Egypt for the National Democratic Institute for International
Affairs. Katulis received a masters degree from Princeton Universitys Woodrow Wilson School for Public and
International Affairs and a B.A. in history and Arab and Islamic Studies from Villanova University. Hardin Lang is a
Senior Fellow at American Progress, where he focuses on U.S. national security and multilateral affairs, Middle East
policy, and the role of Islamists in the region. He comes to American Progress with 18 years of experience in
peacekeeping, peacebuilding, and stabilization, including a 12-year career with the United Nations. Most recently,
Lang was a senior fellow in the international security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
During his tenure at the United Nations, he has served as head of office for former President Bill Clinton in his role
as U.N. and managed peace operations in Afghanistan. Other foreign deployments include a tour as a senior adviser
to the U.N. special representative to Iraq. Lang has led teams of international observers to monitor elections in
Afghanistan and holds a masters degree in public policy from Princeton Universitys Woodrow Wilson School of
Public and International Affairs, and a masters degree in international history from the London School of Economics.
Vikram J. Singh is the Vice President for National Security and International Policy at American Progress. Previously,
he served as the deputy assistant secretary of defense for South and Southeast Asia at the Pentagon, where he
advised senior leadership on all policy matters pertaining to development and implementation of defense strategies
and plans for the region. Until November 2011, Singh was the deputy special representative for Afghanistan and
Pakistan at the U.S. Department of State. He has also served in the U.S. Department of Defense as a senior advisor
on Afghanistan and Pakistan, representing the department in National Security Council policy reviews of the region
and the war in Afghanistan, and as a senior advisor responsible for the departments post-2014 strategic approach
to South and Central Asia. From 2003 to 2007 Singh served in the Department of Defense. He holds degrees from
the University of California at Berkeley and Columbia University. Defeating ISIS: An Integrated Strategy to Advance
Middle East Stability, 9/10/14,
<https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/report/2014/09/10/96739/defeating-isis-an-integrated-strategyto-advance-middle-east-stability/>//ak
The United States should propose that states in the region commit to common
principles and specific, coordinated actions to help isolate and counter ISIS and
better respond to the humanitarian catastrophe. This will not be easy as the SunniShia sectarian divide in the region is now accompanied by growing tensions between
leading Sunni-majority states. In addition, key countries in the region lack some basic capacities needed for
operational impact, as demonstrated by the failure of regional efforts to support elements of the anti-Assad
opposition in Syria. While the United States and other countries may need to fill such capability gaps, regional
With partners in
the region, the United States can take the following steps: Create an ISIS-focused
intelligence fusion cell in the region. The United States has a wide range of networked relationships
partners should contribute financial and other resources to support a multinational effort.
with key Middle East intelligence services. Jordan is a close partner in counterterrorism efforts throughout the
Middle East and outside the region in places such as Afghanistan. Saudi intelligence services have been battling
certain Islamist extremist groups, such as ISIS and al-Nusra Frontthe Al Qaeda affiliate now dominating parts of
the battlefield. The Turkish National Intelligence Organization also has extensive intelligence contacts and
economies such as oil smuggling and extortion, and external support, mainly from individuals in Gulf states. Some
To disrupt ISISs
finances, the United States should work with regional partners to target the criminal
networks that ISIS uses to sell goods or otherwise generate revenue; disrupt ISIS oil extraction,
estimates project ISIS will raise between $100 million and $200 million over the next year.
transport, and refining operations and prevent exchanges with buyers in foreign markets such as Iran, Turkey, and
the Kurdistan Regional Government, or KRG; and disrupt online and regional fundraising efforts. The United States
should create an interagency threat finance cell headed by either the U.S. Treasury Department or State
Department with military and intelligence personnel, and it should be based in the region to help coordinate the
Syria and Iraq. The United States has already stepped up its direct military assistance to Iraqi Kurdish forces
and has proposed an additional $500 million to support select members of the Syrian opposition. These efforts
should be incorporated into a regional plan. In many instances, the most capable security partners will likely be
These strikes should be conducted as part of a regional or international coalition under a multilateral framework
with congressional authorization and oversight.
Secretary Powell has spoken eloquently of the foreign policy benefits that accrue to the United States from being
the destination of choice for the worlds internationally mobile students and, especially, from educating successive
gain access to the United States by posing as students? Of course there is; that danger exists with respect to all
nonimmigrant visitors, of which students constitute only a minuscule two percent. All countries must confront a
central question of our age, which is how to reconcile global mobility with global terrorism .
Openness to mobility carries dangers; higher education wants to be a part of the greater attention to these dangers
that is now necessary, and of the more robust enforcement measures that are now required. In this context, the
task force fully supports appropriate screening and monitoring measures. Schools are collectively spending millions
of dollars and countless hours to implement the international student tracking system that became a federal
priority on September 11. They are working with the Department of State to protect the integrity of student visas
and to prevent their fraudulent use by those who seek access to the United States for illegitimate reasons. Research
institutions are wrestling with questions of access to sensitive scientific information and are doing their best to
strike the appropriate balance. In these and other ways, higher education is doing its part to help protect our
But to unduly restrict the access of future leadersand, indeed, the youth of
the worldto this country is to court a greater danger , which is to nurture the
isolationism, fundamentalism, and bigoted caricatures that drive antiWestern terrorism. After September 11, it seems clear that the more people who can
experience this country first-hand, breaking down the stereotypes they grow up with
and opening their minds to a world beyond their borders, the better it is for U.S.
security
country.
Commission on Public Diplomacy's March 2004 report cites that "junior officers now receive more than twenty-five
to thirty-three percent more training in "hard' and "superhard' languages." 85 The Report indicates the poor
linguistic record of Foreign Service officials filling "language-designated' positions abroad. 86 According to the
September 2003 Government Accountability Office ("GAO") report, "21 percent of the 332 Foreign Service officers ...
the United States Senate, Robert Mueller, Director of the FBI, acknowledged these intelligence gaps, stating "I
remain very concerned about what we are not seeing." 88 Mueller further highlighted the FBI's need to obtain
useful leads to prevent terrorist attacks. 89 The fact remains that law enforcement has no information that any of
terrorists within the world's Muslim population in an interview with NPR. 92 Clark noted that some of the September 11th hijackers were in the United States for months. 93 Two of the
hijackers spent a considerable amount of time in the United States without speaking English, first in Southern California, and then in Virginia. 94 They had an apartment, bought food,
and went about their daily lives. Clearly, they would not have been able to survive without help. Clark's theory is that there were "facilitators supporting the couple of cells of hijackers."
95 We agree with Clarke that there was help given to these terrorists from members of the Muslim and Arab community. However, we find the implication that these helpers were
complicit co-conspirators unfounded. To our knowledge there is no actionable intelligence to prove that those who aided the terrorists in the months leading up to the September 11th
attacks knew that these people were terrorists. No one was ever indicted for aiding and abetting these terrorists. 96 To the contrary, The 9/11 Commission Report mentions a striking
example of an FBI informant who rented a room to two of the September 11th [*510] terrorists, Hazmi and Mihdhar, during 2000. 97 This FBI informant, who presumably would have
been trained to be aware and vigilant regarding out-of-place behavior, failed to notice anything remarkable about these two. 98 This informant is still in good standing with the FBI, 99
and therefore his help was clearly unwitting. This example bolsters our belief that behavioral profiling does not always work. One perspective on how to think about Al-Qaeda terrorists
and the people who help them is presented by Clark in an NPR interview. He states: Picture in your mind three concentric circles. The largest circle is all members of the Islamic world,
1.3 billion, 1.5 billion people. The second circle are those people who now identify with al-Qaeda and say they support bin-Laden's philosophy. That circle used to be relatively small. It's
now, however, probably several hundred million people. They don't fight, but they do support ... . And then an inner circle, a very small circle, in the core of this, and that is the group of
terrorists who actually go out and fight and die. And this may be 10,000, it may be 40,000. 100 Clarke's idea is that we need to decrease the size of this second circle which has grown
since the inception of war in Iraq. 101 The way he suggests doing this is to fight "a battle of ideas" within that second circle. 102 While Clarke's description of Al-Qaeda's extremist
philosophy being at the core of the larger Islamic "circle" is debatable, we do agree that there is a strong need to present a counterargument to Al-Qaeda propaganda. The battle of ideas
he is talking about is abroad. However, there is also an important battle of ideas to be fought at home. We see this "battle of ideas" as a battle for the "hearts and minds" of Muslims and
Arabs in the United States as well as abroad. We see the second circle, the place where the battle of ideas needs to be won, as comprised of people who do not support terrorism and do
not engage in terrorist activities. These people may dislike American foreign policy, but still strongly oppose terrorism. At all costs we need to keep these people out of the third inner
they have an incentive to help prevent future terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. Moreover, they are as likely to be the
A big factor here is the rise of The Islamic State . Virtually every player in the region is
not fond of IS (accusations and conspiracy theories aside, IS surely does not have any open supporters per se).
In fact, the recent nuclear deal might just have happened as an outcome of the fact
that USA needs Iran to fight against IS in Iraq and possibly in Syria. Recently, at the
Turkish-Iranian summit, Iran gave a warm reception to Turkish President Erdogan. Even though both Turkey and Iran
do not see eye to eye on various issues, they still managed to agree to double their trade from $14bn to $30bn .
The same model should be implemented in case of Saudi Arabia and Iran as well.
Diplomacy is the way forward, war is not. Of course, such a summit seems unlikely as of now,
especially because the Islamic Middle East has multiple players in the picture: Turkey on one hand, the Saudi
Arabian party on the second, and Iran and its friends on the third. More importantly, the volatile borders in the
Middle East are surely not sensible, and a good number of them were drawn not by legitimate methods but as a by-
The divisions in the Middle East -- be it the case of Iraq, or Syria or Palestine or
are more artificial and less logical. But this is
precisely why diplomacy can be helpful. As a matter of fact, the best way forward
for the Arab World would be complete unification, in sync with the aspirations of the Arab people
and against the wishes of both Israel and oil-hungry West. Sadly, that seems unlikely as of now , and
whether you like it or not, Saudi Arabia is the de facto face of the Gulf. As such, any solution will have to
acknowledge the reality and focus on arriving at a conclusion thereafter . Similarly,
product of imperialism.
Iranian borders and desires may be questionable, but it does stand tall as a powerful Islamic entity, and can serve
as a legitimate check against Zionist aggression (something that the Arabian powers have failed to do so far). Right
now,
foreign detractors. Probably Turkey and Qatar can mediate, whereas Saudi Arabia, Iran and other relevant parties
to be the sole voice of sanity. In such a tug of war, there are no winners, and if the current trend continues, all of
framework should be set up for this purpose, and Turkey maintains its close cooperation with its international
partners against every form and method of terrorism.
***Of-Case***
Topicality
Domestic
Within US Borders
Interpretation: Domestic means physically within the U.S.
borders.
DOD 82 (Department of Defense, regulation sets forth procedures governing the
Curtail
Elimination
We meet: the af reduces overall domestic surveillance, SEVIS
is just a program
Counter- Interpretation: Curtailing domestic surveillance
necessitates elimination.
Ackerman 14 (Spencer, national security editor for Guardian US. A former senior
writer for Wired, Failure to pass US surveillance reform bill could still curtail NSA
powers, October 3rd, 2014, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/03/usafreedom-act-house-surveillance-powers)//ghs-VA
Two members of the US House of Representatives are warning that a failure to pass landmark
surveillance reform will result in a far more drastic curtailment of US surveillance powers
one that will occur simply by the House doing nothing at all. As the clock ticks down on the 113th Congress, time
is running out for the USA Freedom Act, the first legislative attempt at reining in the National Security Agency
Unless the Senate passes the stalled bill in the brief session following
the NSA will keep all of its existing powers to collect
US phone records in bulk, despite support for the bill from the White House, the House of
during the 9/11 era.
Representatives and, formally, the NSA itself. But supporters of the Freedom Act are warning that the intelligence
agencies and their congressional allies will find the reform bills legislative death to be a cold comfort. On 1 June
2015, Section 215 of the Patriot Act will expire. The loss of Section 215 will deprive the NSA of the legal pretext for
its bulk domestic phone records dragnet. But it will cut deeper than that: the Federal Bureau of Investigation will
lose its controversial post-9/11 powers to obtain vast amounts of business records relevant to terrorism or
espionage investigations. Those are investigative authorities the USA Freedom Act leaves largely untouched.
Section 215s expiration will occur through simple legislative inertia, a characteristic of the House of
the next Congress, expected to be more Republican and more hostile to domestic spying, is unlikely to reauthorise
Section 215.
Surveillance
such as changes of domestic address and in program study. SEVIS also maintains information on the schools,
exchange visitor program sponsors, and their representatives (i.e., designated school officials, responsible officers,
and alternate responsible officers).
Domestic Surveillance
Domestic surveillance collects information of people within the
border.
Avilez et al 14 (Marie Avilez, Catherine Ciriello, Christophe Combemale, Latif
Elam, Michelle Kung, Emily LaRosa, Cameron Low, Madison Nagle, Rachel Ratzlaff
Shriver, Colin Shaffer; Senior Capstone Students, Ethics, History, and Public Policy,
December 10, 2014, http://www.cmu.edu/hss/ehpp/documents/2014-CitySurveillance-Policy.pdf)//ghs-VA
Domestic surveillance collection of information about the activities of
private individuals/organizations by a government entity within national borders;
this can be carried out by federal, state and/or local officials.
Generic
SEVIS is surveillance
Toutant 09 Dr. Ligia Toutant received her Ph.D. in Social Sciences and Comparative Education from UCLA in
2009. She has an eclectic background in economics, human communication, sociology, and sustainability. As an
active member of the Comparative and International Education Society (CIES), in 2010 Dr. Toutant created a special
interest group, Education for Sustainable Development, that functions under the auspices of this society.
International Graduate Students, the F-l Visa Process, and the Dark Side of Globalization in Post 9/11 American
Society, ProQuest Database, //ak
In addition to the articles summarized above, I read many others just to get a feeling of what has been published
about international students, and I agree with Szelenyi's and Rhoads' statement. Indeed, there are many studies on
how international students encounter challenges due to the language barriers and psychological alienation.
Szelenyi and Rhoads argue that despite efforts to expedite visas for international students, many problems continue
to exist. They assert, "The
CP
VISA CP
SEVIS is the main problem of visa delayscomputerized
tracking systems of students is slow and delays visas
Michael R. Traven, 2006, he focuses his practice on commercial and business related transactions and
litigation. , Capital University Law Review 34 Cap. U.L. Rev. 693 LENGTH: 22989 words COMMENT: RESTRICTING
INNOVATION: HOW RESTRICTIVE U.S. VISA POLICIES HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO DEPLETE OUR INNOVATIVE ECONOMY
The
Act has affected the creative class primarily through its reestablishment of the
computerized tracking system of foreign students, [*718] named the Student Exchange and
Visitor Information System (SEVIS) n168 -a program that had initially been created through the Illegal Immigrant
Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 n169 (IIRIRA). " SEVIS increases the ability of the
INS to maintain up-to-date information on foreign students and exchange visitors in
order to ensure that they arrive in the United States, show up and register at the
school or exchange program, and properly maintain their status during their stay ."
n170 The Patriot Act's establishment of SEVIS has directly afected the creative class
because the slow and inefective implementation of the tracking program
has led to unnecessary and costly visa delays. n171
If you are at the top of your field and would like the opportunity to work in the U nited
States, you may qualify for the EB-1 Visa. This visa gives you first preference due to
the extraordinary ability or achievements that you have had, which will make you a
valuable asset to the US workforce. People in almost any field can qualify for this
type of visa. There are three main categories for this visa, each of which have different requirements.
Extraordinary Ability Those who can show that they have an extraordinary ability in art,
education, business, athletics, or other skill may qualify for this category. You will need to
either have achieved a significant award (Olympic Medal, Pulitzer Prize, Oscar, ect) or meet at least three criteria
listed below.
for this category. The following criteria for this category are pulled directly from the US Department of homeland
security: Evidence of receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence Evidence of your membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members
Evidence of published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media Evidence that you have been asked to judge the work of others, either individually or on a panel Evidence of your original
scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media Evidence that
your work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases Evidence of your performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations Evidence that you command a high salary or other significantly high
You will need a minimum of three years of experience in the specific academic area to qualify. In addition, you need to have a minimum of two of the below listed criteria and an offer of employment
from a US employer. Evidence of receipt of major prizes or awards for outstanding achievement Evidence of membership in associations that require their members to demonstrate outstanding achievement Evidence of published
material in professional publications written by others about the aliens work in the academic field Evidence of participation, either on a panel or individually, as a judge of the work of others in the same or allied academic field
Evidence of original scientific or scholarly research contributions in the field Evidence of authorship of scholarly books or articles (in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the field Multinational Manager or Executive
however it will be very basic information just to introduce you to the idea and to give a brief understanding of
whats required. The US 0-1 Visa for aliens of extraordinary ability is a legal minefield and there are some things
that you just cannot explain on paper. There are also some Industry links and procedures that I cant give away
because of different reasons. You are always welcome to connect if you need any help. Let's begin The
O-1
non-immigrant visa is for foreign nationals who possess extraordinary ability in the
sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, or who have demonstrated a record
of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry and have
been recognized nationally or internationally for those achievements. O-1 visas require an
employer sponsor - a foreign national cannot petition for an O-1 visa on his or her own behalf. So the description of
the 0-1 Visa is pretty straight forward.
extraordinary ability. The reason Industry Hollywood recommend this particular type of working Visa is
because it is an umbrella Visa which allows the holder to take part in all kinds of media production rather than
the necessary paraphernalia) to be given an answer to your application. You will be given a Social Security number
(National Insurance number) and you will pay tax to the US Government on your earnings. The Visa typically lasts
for 3 years, the holder can then be based in the US.
Borjas' argument seems to presume that foreign students come to the United States
with the sole goal of immigration. n58 Since the United States immigration policy gives preference to
family-based criterion, foreign students will find this an easy and convenient avenue to immigration compared with
other immigration categories. n59 Nevertheless, the extent in which foreign students create a visa-abusing problem
Appendix shows the percentage of foreign students (F-1) that adjusted their status to permanent residence status
from year 1994 to 2002. n61 In 1994, about 10.1 percent of foreign students who entered the United States with
student visas adjusted their temporary status to permanent residence status. n62 The number declined drastically
holders adjusted their status, "representing sixty-four percent of all "new" immigrants admitted that year." n64
persons who entered the United States as visitors for pleasure (B-2)
and temporary workers (H-1B) have the highest adjustment of status rates , which
accounts for one quarter of all the adjustment cases. n65 Foreign students accounted for less than
three percent of the adjustment cases in 2002. n66 This comparison suggests that claiming the
foreign student program provides students an opportunity to abuse the visa system
to achieve permanent residence is incomplete.
Among them, [*353]
STEM CP
Turnimmigrant workers help raise the wages of American
workersstats prove
India Panorma 15, SouthAsian English newspaper with print editions in New York City, the Tristate
area and now also as the first English Indian Newspaper from Dallas, printed weekly , H1B Visa The Conflicting
Perceptions, The Indian Panorma, June 28, 2015, http://www.theindianpanorama.com/featured/h1b-visa-theconflicting-perceptions-41760.html
In fact, Kerrs study suggested exactly the opposite that the growth of
immigrant workers helps younger American technical workers; more of
them are hired and at higher-paying jobs but has no noticeable
consequences, good or bad, on older workers. Kerr also said that in the short run, we
dont find really any adverse or super-positive effect on the employment of
Americans, adding that people take an extremely one-sided view of this stuff and
dismiss any evidence to the contrary. And yet another study conducted by
academics at the University of California at Berkeley found that over the span of a
decade in an urban area, a 1 percentage (of total employment) increase in foreign STEM
workers during a decade actually increased the wages of native-born American
college graduates by 4 percent to 6 percent, with small effect on their employment.
DA
Crowdout DA
Foreign students dont steal US jobs because theres a
shortage in STEM without themin fact, the emergence of
foreign students actually raise US citizens wagesstats prove
India Panorma 15, SouthAsian English newspaper with print editions in New York City, the Tristate
area and now also as the first English Indian Newspaper from Dallas, printed weekly , H1B Visa The Conflicting
Perceptions, The Indian Panorma, June 28, 2015, http://www.theindianpanorama.com/featured/h1b-visa-theconflicting-perceptions-41760.html
Foreign students reach the U.S. after satisfying the university admission and visa
requirements. They overcome all the culture shocks and become American little by
little. They usually pay more than twice in tuition than local students in public universities. Many of them
work as a graduate assistant (teaching or research). Some of their research funds
directly come from federal authorities including NSF, NASA, NOAA, USDA, USGS,
EPA, and so forth. Some of them have multiple degrees from U.S. universities. Most
of them finish their masters or doctorates. They publish papers in research journals.
Some of them work as a PI (Principal Investigator) in their projects. Many of them
obtain patents for their innovation. These students pay income taxes from their first
earnings. Local grocery stores to car dealers and credit card companies depend on
them to grow their business. After 5 years of staying, their tax status changes to tax-purpose residents
and they pay taxes (including social security tax and Medicare tax) equal to U.S. citizens. In the U.S., 11.57 percent
of the population above 25 years old have graduate or professional degrees [6, 7]. Therefore, foreign STEM
broken immigration law does not allow them to become permanent residents easily.
Brain Drain DA
UQ
Alt causes to Chinese economic decline means its inevitable
whether the plan occurs or notcorruption, pollution, and
immigration to countries other than the US also hinder Chinas
development
Kirby and McFarlan 15, William C. Kirby, Professor of China Studies at Harvard, F. Warren
McFarlan, a faculty member at Harvard Business Review, china-still-isnt-ready-to-be-a-true-global-leader, Harvard
Business Review, Jan 5, 2015, https://hbr.org/2015/01/china-still-isnt-ready-to-be-a-true-global-leader
No link
No linkUS policy changes wont drastically change the
immigration of Chinese studentsstudents are already
hesitant to stay abroadin fact, it motivates students to
improve education back at home
Luo 14, Chris Luo, 14 years of marketing, sales operations, and strategy experience for startup, mid-size, and
large companies in US and Asia-Pacific. US relaxation of visa scheme triggers fears over brain drain from China,
South China Morning Post, 17 November, 2014, http://www.scmp.com/news/china-insider/article/1642267/usrelaxation-visa-scheme-triggers-debate-fears-over-brain-drain
that
those interested in becoming entrepreneurs were most inclined to stay after
graduation. US still a magnet for the entrepreneurial Among multiple factors, the choice of
group headed by Richard Appelbaum that investigated international students' career choices and found
career plays a key role in students deciding to stay or leave the US upon graduation. Our study found those who
wanted to work with business groups, or start their own business, or work for a non-governmental organization had
US continues to be viewed as
a hub for innovation and research. However, for those wanting a career in academia
or a governmental agency, the choice is more complicated and depends on a
combination of social, professional and personal reasons. They come but they are
going back in higher numbers Perceived as a global leader in STEM innovation, the US remains the
most popular destination in the world for international students. International
students are also more likely to earn a doctorate in a STEM related field than their
American counterparts. From 2001 to 2011, 84% of doctorate degrees earned by international students
a 90% likelihood of wanting to stay in the US. This suggests to us that the
were in STEM compared to only 63% by US citizens and permanent residents. STEM areas are offering exciting
drug delivery, STEM disciplines offer exciting possibilities of research with significant economic and global impact. A
2011 study focusing only on foreign STEM doctoral recipients in the US has found that the percentage of individuals
who stay long-term after graduation has steadily decreased. At the same time, studies by Brookings, Harvard,
NAFSA: Association of International Educators, and the Institute of International Education have highlighted
that
But to stay past their OPT period, international students must find a
business willing to sponsor them for an H-1B visa. Respondents in our study were
forthright on how frustrating they found the H-1B visa process. Students say visa
issues are a major deterrent For instance, a graduate student in electrical and
computer engineering said: The H-1B visa makes you get a sponsor for five years
or so and you are bound to that employer and that is not very attractive. If the US
wants to retain talent, people need freedom to pursue what they want to
research . Another graduate student in mechanical engineering voiced a similar sentiment: The fact that
you dont have a green card at the end of your PhD its a nightmare. For
international students, not having a green card - it impacts the job search
everything. For policymakers in the US, such a large pool of STEM students raises
crucial questions about the direction of future policies. Do we want to retain
international STEM graduates? And if so, how do we go about easing immigration
policies restrictions so as to encourage those most likely to contribute to the
American economy?
OPT extension.
China
Only a third of Chinese students have returned
The Economist 14 (The Economist is an acclaimed news magazine that focuses on the intersection of
economics, politics, and social issues. A matter of honors, 11/22/14
http://www.economist.com/news/china/21633865-china-trying-reverse-its-brain-drain-matter-honours)
Sending students abroad has been central to Chinas efforts to improve its
education since the late 1970s, when it began trying to repair the damage wrought by Maos destruction
of the countrys academic institutions. More than 3 million Chinese have gone overseas to
study. Chinese youths make up over a fifth of all international students in higher
education in the OECD, a club mostly of rich countries. More than a quarter of them are in
America. Every country sends out students. What makes China different is that most of these
bright minds have stayed away. Only a third have come back, according to the
Ministry of Education; fewer by some counts . A study this year by a scholar at Americas
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education found that 85% of those who gained their
doctorate in America in 2006 were still there in 2011.
of
free apartment. Some of the best universities have built homes for academics to rent or buy at a discount. All are
promised top-notch facilities. Many campuses, which were once spartan, now have swanky buildings (one of
Tsinghuas is pictured above). The programmes have also targeted non-Chinese. A foreign expert thousand-talent
scheme, launched in 2011, has enticed around 200 people. Spending on universities has shot up, too: sixfold in
2001-11. The results have been striking. In 2005-2012 published research articles from higher-education institutions
University Rankings. Shanghais Jiao Tong University includes only 32 institutions from mainland China among the
worlds 500 best. The government frets about the failure of a Chinese scholar ever to win a Nobel prize in science
(although the country has a laureate for literature and anunwelcomewinner in 2010 of the Nobel peace prize,
Liu Xiaobo, an imprisoned dissident).Pulling
a large
proportion of the companies that returnees have set up in Wuxi have failed. And if
there is one thing that Chinese officials hate to acknowledge, it is failure . No matter
that large proportions of start-up companies all over the world fail. As many as 40
percent of startups in the United States quickly go bankrupt, according to Harvard
Business School research. The big difference is that in America this is not a cause
for shame, but regarded as a natural result of the risks that small entrepreneurs
take. In China it is seen as a reflection and a poor one on the officials who
sponsored the entrepreneurs. I could not find out exactly how many of the businesses launched through the Wuxi
incentive program had gone bust. The program managers were not allowed to talk to me, and the city government refused to do so.
why the very best Chinese scientists, and the very brightest entrepreneurs, are not coming home.
tolerate failure. Vision and strategic thinking, which are held in such high regard in the West, are
off the agenda. This situation is improving. A special amendment to the law on the progress of science and
technology was passed in late 2007, acknowledging that failure is part of the innovation process. Yet there
remains tremendous pressure on scientists, including returnees, for immediate results.
There is growing evidence that plagiarism, fraud and manipulation of data are
interwoven through China's research process. With the scientific community failing to take action, many
potential returnees are reluctant to enter this environment. Political obstacles also
act as deterrents. Certain types of social science research are deemed politically
unacceptable even though there is an understanding that China cannot afford to expand its economy without
the participation of social thinkers and public intellectuals. Most of the academic returnees are natural scientists;
social scientists (except economists) have not returned, and they are cautious about working even part-time in
China for fear of political reprisals. The success of government efforts to attract individuals capable of steering
China
along a path of sustainable development will be judged not on numbers of returnees, but on whether it can
create a new research culture in which every scientist, whether trained overseas or at home, has the
opportunity to demonstrate value. It's a pity, then, that the problems associated with initiatives like the Thousand
Known for its production of everything from Apple products to American flags, China
has become the second largest economy in the world due to its manufacturing
prowess. However, despite this explosive economic growth, higher education in
China is still unappealing, and job prospects for the highly educated are grim.
Chinese universities do not match the academic strength of universities in other
nations, and the Chinese government actually encourages students to seek higher education overseas.
Ultimately, the majority of these workers never return to China a problem that the
Chinese government is trying to ameliorate with monetary incentives. However, this
problem is deep, and it cant be addressed by handing out some extra cash. In order
for China to lure back its highly educated workforce, its going to have to confront
the problems that exist within its work culture.
Russia
Russias innovation sector is growingnew reforms prove
Appell 15 (James Appell is a tech worker and journalist. The Short Life and Speedy Death of Russias Silicon
Valley 5/6/15, http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/05/06/the-short-life-and-speedy-death-of-russias-silicon-valleymedvedev-go-russia-skolkovo/)
Of the worlds major economies, Russias had fared the worst in the aftermath of the global downturn. GDP shrank
by 7.9 percent across 2009, including a record 10.9 percent in the second quarter. Unemployment hit a peak of 9.4
percent in February of that same year. Going into the crisis, oil and natural gas had accounted for some two-thirds
and they covered industries ranging from nuclear power to space technology to pharmaceuticals. Medvedevs
reforms called for, among other things, a 40 percent reduction in Russias energy consumption by 2020, and the
education, and office space. Little by little, Medvedev would make his country known mostly for oil and gas
production and the mining of minerals and heavy metals an attractive place for homegrown innovation and tech
entrepreneurs. Our country has always had an abundance of innovative, progressive, and talented people,
Medvedev said in his 2009 State of the Nation address, two months after the publication of Go Russia! They are
the pillar holding up the innovative world, and we need to do everything we can to make these specialists want to
work here in their own country. The program was met with some skepticism at home and abroad theEconomist,
for instance, called Medvedevs plans implausible. But Go Russia! appeared to get off to a good start. The
Medvedev government traveled abroad to champion its new favorite industry, negotiating a partnership between
Skolkovo and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and securing financial support from
Silicon Valley luminaries, including a $100 million investment from Cisco. Start-ups
began flocking to the campus: It grew from 332 resident companies in 2011, to 793
a year later, to more than a thousand by 2013. Foreign capital flooded into
Russia:Yandex, Russias largest search engine, staged its initial public offering on the Nasdaq exchange in 2011,
raising $1.3 billion at the time the largest dot-com IPO in the United States since Googles in 2004. The 2010 IPO
on the London Stock Exchange of Mail.ru, a major Russian Internet holding comprising social networking and
gaming sites, was 20 times oversubscribed, according to insiders.
Russia is experiencing another major brain drain. Although emigration trended downward from 1997
to 2011, there was a sudden spike in people leaving the country around the third term of
President Vladimir Putin, according to Rosstat, Russia's federal state statistics service. In 2012, almost
123,000 people left, and in 2013, more than 186,000 got out . Additionally, a UN report
showed that 40,000 Russians applied for asylum in 2013 76% more than in 2012 . The biggest bombshell
of all is that since April 2014 a month after Russia annexed Crimea 203,659 Russians
have left the country. By comparison, approximately 37,000 people left the country in 2011, and less than
34,000 people left in 2010. Furthermore, the emigration numbers may be even higher. "The official statistics are
very low," Mikhail Gorshkov, the director of the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute of Sociology told Reuters.
What's particularly interesting is the type of people who are leaving the country . "While the total
number of Russians who leave for good remains relatively small, the profile of the typical emigrant has changed.
Today, it is a
well-off professional," according to World Policy. "People who have it good are starting to leave," Anton
Nosski, a tech entrepreneur, told World Policy. Notable individuals who have left include chess
grandmaster Garry Kasparov, economist Sergei Guriyev, journalist Leonid Bershidsky, and the
founder of VKontakte (Russia's version of Facebook) Pavel Durov. For the most part, these
people are leaving either for their children or for their professional futures.
"Corruption, red tape, and allegedly crooked courts are [also] driving the exodus
among entrepreneurs," according to Reuters. "I want my children to grow up in a fairer
country, one where the rule of law is more or less observed. I used think it was possible to
When the Soviet Union dissolved, the most common emigrant was a poor, unskilled young man.
build a better society in Russia, but I've basically lost all hope now. It's time to leave," one Russian businessman told
Vocativ. "Russian venture capital funds want to invest their money only in Russia," start-up founder Artem
Kulizhnikov told Bloomberg news, "but we want to build an international business and they won't support us."
Additionally, Russia's "creative class" is starting to feel isolated, although some politicians seem unfazed. "Russia
won't lose anything if the entire so-called creative class leaves. What's the creative class anyway? For me, a woman
who gets up at 5 a.m. to milk a cow is creative because she produces something. Not some guy with a stupid
haircut who sits in a cafe all day long writing in his blog," said Vitaly Milonov, a Member of the Legislative Assembly
of Saint Petersburg. But the brain drain isn't the whole story.
Huge influxes of immigrants are entering Russia as well. This makes sense: If many highlevel individuals and intellectuals are leaving Russia, more high-end jobs and
opportunities will become available in Russia . According to the UN, Russia saw the second-largest
number of international migrants in 2013. The number of people moving into Russia actually
tops the number of people moving out (which you can see above.) Many of the immigrants come
from countries like Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, according to data from Rosstat. Additionally, millennials
who are culturally Russian but were born in the US or Europe are considering opportunities in
Russia. "There are opportunities for my children in Moscow that aren't found anywhere else," one parent told BI. "I
believe that Russia is at a point where they realize they cannot rely on just oil and gas to keep up with the other
"The
opportunities in Russia seem to be more promising than here in the States currently.
BRIC countries and Western economies. Russia is looking to diversify its economy," one 20-something told BI.
Before the current sanctions and drastic low oil prices, Russia was a top seven economic power. As a young RussianAmerican, I've thought about pursuing opportunities abroad that do not exist in the US." The bottom line: Russia is
seeing some dramatic demographic changes that could greatly influence its economic and political future.
India
Indias competitiveness is faltering
Kappor 13 (Amit Kapoor is the Honorary Chairman of the Institute for Competitiveness in India and a
Professor of Strategy at MDI, Gurgaon, India. 1/23/13 India is in danger of losing its competitiveness
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-21156158)
the emergence of IT
as an industry within the country. However, one has to remember that the sector has built its business
on cost arbitrage. The problem with this model is that it is short lived and would last
until the time another low cost location emerges from the shadows. One can already see
the impact of this on the call centre industry in India, which is facing the heat from the Philippines.
India also suffers from the obsession that it is a services economy. The government's
policies in areas such as infrastructure, interest rates, fiscal deficit and inflation have not yielded the desired
results. This idea is inherently hazardous as it hurts innovation in key sectors such as agriculture or
manufacturing, which are paramount to India's growth going forward. India is also often touted as
India has been focusing on and celebrating the wrong achievements. It is great to see
having a demographic dividend, with majority of its population being young. On the face of it, it does seem like a
big advantage to have. But dig a bit deeper and one begins to realise that what India is actually facing is nothing
short of a demographic disaster. According to some estimates, only 4-6% of graduates in India are skilled enough to
get employed. That doesn't do any favours to India's competitiveness. India churns out close to
1.2 million engineers and MBAs graduates per year. But a majority of these graduates are job seekers and not job
creators. That needs to change and the emergence of an entrepreneurial culture is critical for that to happen.
To
add to India's woes, the disparities between its various states are increasing at an
alarming rate. States such as Goa and Delhi boast an annual per capita income of more
than $2,000 (1,250), while at the other end, states such as Bihar and Uttar Pradesh it is
less than $400. If not addressed in time, this can create huge social problems. At the same time, if some
states continue to be more prosperous than the others, it could lead to a big migration of labour from poor to richer
has an evolutionary cycle wherein its growth is driven either by factor, investment or innovation. The first stage in
A
high rate of inflation has been one of the biggest headaches for India's policymakers. At the next stage are
investment-driven economies which have the ability to produce products and services of high quality using efficient
methods but at lower wages than advanced economies. At the end the cycle, are innovation-driven economies that
focus on innovative products and services at the global technology frontier. India today without a doubt is stuck at
the factor-driven stage and is within an arm's reach to get the plot wrong at this level as well. Economies at this
stage of development need to focus on input costs, macro-economic, political and legal stability, efficient basic
The direct contribution of the agriculture sector to national economy is reflected by its
share in total GDP, its foreign exchange earnings, and its role in supplying savings and labor to other
sectors. Agriculture and allied sectors like forestry and fishing accounted for 18.5
percent of total Indian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2005-06 (at 1999-2000 constant prices) and
employed about 58 percent of the country's workforce (CSO, 2007). It accounted for 10.95 percent of Indias
exports in 2005-06 (GoI, 2007) and about 46 percent of India's geographical area is used for agricultural activity.
There has been a structural transformation in the Indian economy during the past few decades. The composition of
Gross Domestic Product at 1993-94 constant prices reveals that the share of agriculture including forestry and
fishing has declined as growth in industrial and services sectors far outpaced agricultural sector (Figure 1). The
share of mining, manufacturing, electricity and construction sector has increased from 21.6 percent in 1970-71 to
27 percent in 2004-05 and services sector has increased significantly from 32 percent to 52.4 percent during the
the government. Consistent with the trends of economic development at national level, role of agricultural sector in
the state economies is also changing rapidly. The share of agriculture in Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) has
declined significantly during the last two decades. In some States, such as Bihar, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana,
Rajasthan, and Orissa, the sector today contributes more than one-quarter of GSDP, while in some states, such as
Gujarat, Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, the sector contributes less than 20 percent to GSDP
(Figure 2). However, contribution of agriculture to GSDP has declined in almost all States between 1993-94 and
2004-05. The decline was the highest in Karnataka (16%), followed by Haryana (14.2%), and Kerala (13.7%). In
Karnataka, decline was mainly due to significant increase in the share of service sector (from 37.9% in 1993-94 to
54.7% in 2004-05) mainly driven by informational technology (IT) industry. Similar is the case with Haryana the
decline is due to faster development of services sector in cities around the national capital, Delhi. Despite
However, there is disguised employment in the sector due to limited opportunities for rural non-farm employment.
This disguised employment leads to lower labor and resources productivity in the sector relative to other sectors of
the economy. The low labor productivity leads to higher rates of poverty in rural areas (Figure 3). Agriculture in
India is constitutionally the responsibility of the states rather than the central government. The central
government's role is in formulating policy and providing financial resources for agriculture to the states.
Indias output growth accelerated to 7.5% last quarter, putting it ahead of China as
the worlds fastest-growing large economy. According to government data released Friday, gross
domestic product in the South Asian nation grew by 7.3% for the full fiscal year ended in March. That trumps the
previous fiscal years 6.9% expansion and is the countrys fastest annual growth since 2011. Chinas growth last
Manufacturing activity roared ahead at 7.1%. Services such as finance, insurance and real estate continued to
perform strongly, growing by 11.5%. But with below-average rain hurting crops last year, agricultural growth was
to Indias
official GDP-estimation method that boosted some recent growth readings by more
than two percentage points. The revised numbers have confounded analysts and policy makers since
they were announced in January. A raft of other data, including exports and corporate profits,
still points to weakness in Asias third-largest economy . Were all a little bit into the
barely positive, at 0.2%. The latest output figures were helped by a controversial recent update
unknown, said Faraz Syed, a Sydney-based economist atMoodys Analytics. The world needs a strengthening India
Indias $2 trillion
economy still contributes far less to world growth than its northern neighbor, whose
GDP is $10 trillion. But with middling growth prospects in Europe and the U.S., policy makers are hoping India
to help counterbalance weakness across both rich countries and emerging ones like China.
can help pick up some slack. In this cloudy global horizon, India is a bright spot, Christine Lagarde, the
International Monetary Funds managing director, told college students in New Delhi in March. Indias revised GDP
methodology incorporates updated data sources and new ways of capturing activity in the countrys vast and hardto-measure informal economy. How these and other changes added two percentage points to earlier estimates of
sanctity of these growth numbers, said Gautam Singh, an economist at Spark Capital Advisors. Nonetheless,
Prime Minister Modi has basked in the new GDP figures. He marked his governments first anniversary this month by
parading his moves to attract investment and remove hurdles to doing business. The Modi administration is
targeting economic growth of up to 8.5% for this fiscal year. Still, few say the early policy changes have brought
about a radical turnaround. The
Bank credit
growth remains stagnant. There is significant slack in the system. Factories are
running at less than three-fourths capacity, and wholesale prices have fallen yearover-year in each of the last six months. Mr. Syed at Moodys says the new GDP numbers are
necessarily do so if consumer demand remains muted. Home sales in big cities are contracting.
changing the goal posts rather than the actual picture. If the economy is supposedly expanding at more than 7%,
then the potential growth rate is now more likely in the double-digits, he said. One possible sign of recovery is that
federal sales-tax revenue jumped 9.8% in April. This should help the Modi government meet its goal of spending an
additional $11 billion this year on roads, railways and other infrastructure to improve conditions for private
investment. But companies say they need more than a bit of deregulation and new infrastructure before theyll
open their wallets again. Many are struggling with debt and cant easily finance new projects. K. Shankaran, a
director at TTK Prestige Ltd., a kitchen-appliance maker in Bangalore, said his firm invested heavily in new
manufacturing equipment before 2013. But demand has sagged since then. Until that picks up, further investment
is on hold, Mr. Shankaran said. We are more interested in utilizing existing capacity. Indias central bank also isnt
ecstatic about the state of the economy. With inflation having cooled substantially over the last year, the Reserve
Bank of India is expected next week to announce an interest-rate cut to help spark more growth.
Many young men and women educated at highly subsidised public institutions
started leaving the country in the 1960s to deepen or monetise their skills in First World countries. Unlike
short-term contract workers servicing the construction boom in the Persian Gulf and south-east Asia, these
expensively educated seekers of greener grass, many of whom ended up as
prominent bankers, entrepreneurs, innovators and scholars abroad, seemed unlikely
to return to a slow-growth economy. The loss of the best and brightest may have
diminished the growth prospects of what was then a very poor post-colonial country. But in the 1990s,
as news spread of an economic bonanza in India, some of these long-departed brothers, sisters, cousins, nephews
and nieces began to return. In many ways, the achievements as well as the illusions of ''rising'' India in the past two
decades are largely due to this repatriating Indian diaspora, which brought fresh energy, capital, information,
networks and ideas to the motherland. Disillusionment with India's political dysfunction and seemingly ineradicable
corruption and inefficiency has made many of them want to go back to relatively low-growth but less challenging
and more secure economic environments. This is part of a broader flight. India's biggest corporate beneficiaries of
economic liberalisation - names such as Tata, Mahindra, Birla - are putting the bulk of their investments abroad.
Escaping rapidly declining educational institutes at home , more Indian students than
ever before - the number has risen 256 per cent in the past decade to almost
200,000 - have gone abroad, to Spain and China as well as the US, Britain and Australia. Young
technology professionals and bright undergraduates are moving to Singapore, Australia and Silicon Valley. An influx
of wealthy businessmen and financiers has made Indians the highest-income ethnic group in Singapore. A similar
quest for more congenial climes is apparent among China's privileged classes. The country's rapid economic growth
was actually triggered in the late 1970s and 1980s by its far-flung and patriotic diaspora. But the new China they
enabled is now a place - environmentally challenged, and politically and economically unstable - that many of its
wealthy inhabitants hope to leave. A recent report by Bain & Co revealed that an astonishing 60 per cent of Chinese
it surveyed with a net worth of $1.5 million or more wanted to emigrate, and a third of them already have
investments abroad. Chinese seeking second and third homes, and foreign residency and passports, have been
pushing up real-estate prices from Hong Kong to London. Hong Kong, outshone by Shanghai in recent years, has
become a fresh magnet for mainland Chinese .
come home this year; the recent depreciation of the rupee and signs of revival in
the US economy are making them keener to stay on.
program and its hegemonic ambition. Pakistan has long said that its nuclear weapon program is security driven.
While on other hand Indian nuclear weapon program is not security driven, rather it is based on its regional and
global aspirations. The
security threats still exist for Pakistan, but due to its credible nuclear
deterrence Pakistan is capable of crushing such threats or plans. In the recent past, the tragedy, which many
historians remember as the Fall of Dhaka, carries some lessons for us to be learnt. If India could intervene at that
strengthen our strategic institutions with our moral support, rather unnecessarily criticizing the sincere efforts of
our strategic community. Learn by heart: the stronger is our the national defense, the stronger would be the
national development and, vise versa, the stronger is our national development, the stronger will be that of the
Nuclear weapons prohibit the leaders to take any irrational steps, even
a minor one, which can lead towards nuclear war. The Cuban Missile crisis 1962 was the occasion
national defense.
when a war was imminent between USSR and the USA. It was only the credible threat of nuclear use that directed
the political leadership of both superpowers to defuse the crisis with political means. This is the reason why
Pakistan cannot remain oblivious to any nuclear development inside India. It is India that is heavily investing in its
nuclear weapon program and Pakistan is only responding to it, to keep the nuclear deterrence stable at all levels.
Pakistan, if in any case, remains unable to establish the credibility of its nuclear deterrence with continuous
progress in Research & Development of its nuclear weapon program then its mainland will no longer be safe for its
inhabitants. The doctrine of minimum credible deterrence has been designed in accordance with the economic
not evil and their role is only to keep humans the on right path. These are the weapons of restraint,
Brain Circulation
Brain Drainers return with new ideas to develop their home
countries
Easterly and Nyarko 08 William Easterly is a Visiting Fellow at Brookings Global Economy and
Development. He is also a Professor of Economics at New York University, joint with Africa House. Yaw Nyarko is a
Professor of Economics at New York University, joint with Africa House.Is the Brain Drain Good for Africa?,
Brookings Global Economy and Development Review, March 2008, <
http://dri.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/12607/DRIWP31.pdf>>//ak
aspects of the early brain drain and how they assisted in the
development of writing in the local languages, the establishment of formal
educational institutions and the production of the Independence leaders. Given the
history of many African countries, slavery then colonialism and poverty, perhaps the optimal strategy
for the national planners was to send as many of its people abroad to have a
percentage come back with newly acquired skills, human capital, and simply
knowledge about how things are done overseas . We believe that was indeed a desire of many of
Above we mentioned
the post independence leaders, who encouraged students and educated people to travel abroad to learn the way
more interesting are those who maintain residences both in their home country and in the country they drained to.
those whose primary residence is abroad but who return to their home
countries every year to assist in some way or the other with economic development .
Finally there are
Many have used the terminology of brain circulation rather than brain drain to describe the current day movement
of educated Africans between their homes and the west. One other argument that is often made about the brain
drain is that it causes the loss of leadership of a vibrant middle class. The argument is that many of those who are
drained away are the most vibrant and entrepreneurial members of their respective societies. If only they would
stay in their home countries, they would be the engine of growth. Their mere presence would lead to the
the
exposure to outside ideas is itself an engine of growth . Having a significant portion of the
population abroad means that those resident in the home countries are able to benefit via
information flowseither through visits, discussions, etc with those who have drained. Many
of those who do initially drain, often come back with new ideas to help
develop their respective socities. It was mentioned in the introduction the infl uence of the
independence leaders of Africa, many of them who were initially drained but who returned to
their societies later on in life. As has been stressed by the recent growth literature, it is
ideas and knowledge which form a big part of the engine of growth of nations. Our
independence leaders, who were initially brain drained , realized this. Ghana had a scheme,
development of a vibrant middle class, who would insist on western values, transparent government, etc. First,
started by Kwame Nkrumah, of what was called chartered flights. These were government subsidies to encourage
Ghanaian youth in secondary schools or universities to visit the UK. Kwame Nkrumah said bluntly that he wanted
This
circulation of brains helps in the diffusion of knowledge which is precisely what is
needed in our developing economies. Those who are part of the brain drain may be
those who are the most adept at change they after all are the ones who successfully migrated,
his people to see how things were abroad to get an idea of where he wanted to take his country.
perhaps they are better at implementing the change in their home country. Some of the more exciting things going
opened a studyabroad center in Ghana partially based at Ashesi. Another Ghanaian returnee from the brain drain,
noticeable in years to come when future leaders of the world will fail to comprehend the American way of life simply
other . . . in our struggle to uphold common values, and to fulfill common needs.
n288
Politics
The plan is popularjob creation means republicans and
democrats back it
Wallace and Walsh 12, Gregory Wallace is a News and Production Assistant at CNN, specializing
in political topics, Deirdre Walsh is a Senior Congressional Producer for CNN. Over the last 14 years at CNN, Walsh
has covered major news stories including: four presidential campaigns, several midterm elections, and the Sept 11,
2001 attacks. House passes immigration bill to keep science and technology students in U.S.
11/30/12,<http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/30/house-passes-immigration-bill-to-keep-science-andtechnology-students-in-u-s/>ak
Washington (CNN) - The U.S. House approved Republican-backed immigration legislation on
Friday that had previously fallen short in September, though Democrats described it as a piecemeal political move
Jobs Act" would grant as many as 55,000 visas to non-citizens who complete some advanced degrees at U.S.
September, the measure was fast-tracked and so required a two-thirds "super majority" for passage and fell short,
257 to 158. Republicans hailed it as a plus for employers and the economy . "The bill that we
passed will allow these individuals to have a green card if they get a diploma and, therefore, enabling them to stay
in this country to begin their careers to create jobs rather than being forced to leave to go back to their home
countries and actually compete with us," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said at a news conference. Sponsor
Rep. Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican who chairs the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement, " Many
of the
world's top students come to the U.S. to obtain advanced degrees in science,
technology, engineering, and math subjects. We could boost economic growth and
spur job creation by allowing American employers to more easily hire some of the
most qualified foreign graduates of U.S. universities. These students have the ability
to start a company that creates jobs or come up with an invention that could jumpstart a whole new industry." The Obama administration said Wednesday it is opposed to the measure but
did not threaten a veto. "The administration does not support narrowly tailored proposals that do not meet
[President Barack Obama's] long-term objectives with respect to comprehensive immigration reform," a policy
is seen by
some Democrats as a Republican attempt to appeal to non-white voters , who largely
statement from the White House said. The bill does not address broader immigration issues and
sided with Obama over GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney on Election Day. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, RWashington, pointedly criticized her "colleagues from the other side of the aisle" on the House floor Friday for not
passing an immigration measure when they controlled the House, Senate, and White House earlier in Obama's
term. She described the STEM measure as "a piece of the puzzle" and said "we need to take this a piece at a time."
the program so that students in the so-called STEM fields -- science, technology, engineering,
and mathematics -- could stay in the United States and work for up to 29 months. There is currently no limit on the
number of students who can qualify to work in the United States under OPT. But Obama could expand the types of
students who qualify to stay for a longer period or further increase the time-limit on STEM authorizations, perhaps
recent foreign graduates on their payroll until they can secure an H1-B visa.
generation of innovators and entrepreneurs get their start in America, no matter where they are born, Klobuchar
said.We need to move forward on immigration reform for the good of our economy and the good of our country,
and I will continue to push for action. America
continue to push for critical reforms to benefit high-skilled legal immigration and
ensure that the U.S. economy has the talent it needs to be competitive in the global
marketplace, said Flake.
Rand Paul
Paul confirmed his vetono amount of political capital can
sway him
Strauss 7/14, Daniel Strauss is a political writer for Politico. Rand Paul comes out against Iran deal,
7/14/15,< http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/rand-paul-against-iran-deal-120111.html> //ak
The most dovish member of the 2016 Republican presidential field Sen.
against President Obamas nuclear deal with Iran . Paul, who said in April that he would keep an
open mind about the nuclear talks, registered three objections to the agreement unveiled on
Tuesday. In a Facebook post, the Kentucky senator said his three concerns were: 1) sanctions relief
precedes evidence of compliance, 2) Iran is left with significant nuclear capacity, 3)
it lifts the ban on selling advanced weapons to Iran. I will, therefore, vote
against the agreement, he said. While I continue to believe that negotiations are preferable to war,
I would prefer to keep the interim agreement in place instead of accepting a bad deal, Paul added.
Terror DA
No Link
SEVIS isnt efective at fighting terrorlitany of problems with
this program
David Treystser, Copyright (c) 2003, Treyster is an Attorney in Fort Lee, NJ, New York Law School New York
Law School Journal of International & Comparative Law 2003 22 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 497 LENGTH: 15448
words NOTES & COMMENTS: FOREIGN STUDENTS V. NATIONAL SECURITY: WILL DENYING EDUCATION PREVENT
TERRORISM?
power of the INS. n107 SEVIS will also monitor the students' activity on campus, from criminal activity to major fields of study. n108 Furthermore, the system will also monitor any changes in majors and "red flag" certain courses of
study, such as nuclear physics. n109 If a foreign student enrolls to pursue a literature degree and [*513] then switches their major to nuclear physics, the move will be monitored by the school as well as immigration officials. n110
SEVIS should be limited to that information which is relevant to the INS; it should be used only to confirm that the student is still attending school. n111 The SEVIS program is excessively intrusive and the INS is not using the program
to provide a service to the schools, as mandated by section 641(c) of IIRIRA, but to track terrorists. n112 INS is not an agency that tracks terrorists and this power should not be delegated to them. n113 Currently, schools are
required to provide INS with the "current academic status" of a student, a definition that hinges on whether the student is attending school full time. n114 The INS will redefine that term to include which major field of study the student is enrolled in. n115 None of the acts mandate that institutions provide INS with the major of the students or provide the INS with the new major that the student changes to. n116 The system that was introduced to automate the
reporting process is being used as a tool to invade the privacy of foreign students, by accessing their information without consent and labeling them as potential terrorists. n117 The government needs to stop placing additional
institutional boundaries will require a tremendous task force and the INS lacks the personnel to accomplish this.
n124 INS currently has fewer than 5,000 inspectors to evaluate people at ports of entry and only about 2,000
It will
be very hard to monitor foreign students because the agents are "focused in a lot of
different directions." n126 Even in big cities, the immigration service typically assigns only one person to work on visas with colleges and
intelligence officers to find people who overstay their visas or break the law while in the United States. n125
myriad other schools offering subjects like com-puter, language, and flight training. n127 Catching immigrants who overstay their visas has been a "very
very low priority and it should be a low priority." n128 In March of 2002, a bureaucratic blunder made the INS a laughingstock, showcasing the agency's
embarrass-ing gaffe for an agency that has long been criticized in Congress for sloppy management and inept
record keeping and for being unable to control the borders or keep track of foreigners in the U.S. legally or illegally.
"This shows the complete incompetence of the INS to enforce our laws and
protect our borders." n133 "This kind of thing happens all the time to people who
aren't terrorists, but then it's not news . The very fact that this falls through the
cracks tells you that they do not really own their own data, or have much control
over what happens to it." n134 INS officials have little grasp of the foreign student population, including how many are taking classes
n132
illegally or out of status. n135 Embarrassed by issuing visas to dead hijackers, the agency is struggling to prove it can reliably track anyone. n136
However, the INS has also failed to keep track of schools authorized to accept foreign students. n137 Alt-hough INS is supposed to review the schools
every two years, the authorized list contains institutions that dissolved years ago, in one case, more than a decade ago. n138 As a result of these
"blunders," President Bush will likely accept a proposal from his domestic defense advisers to merge parts of the embattled INS and the Customs Service
into a new agency that would exert firmer control over who and what enters the country. n139
ability to lead? Another thing September 11 did not change is that we cannot effectively lead a world we do not understand.
Foreign scholars who help us understand the world from whence they
come do not threaten our national security; they enhance it . If cracking down on
foreign students and scholars could really protect us against terrorism, i t might be necessary to forego
the benefits that they bring. But that's not the case. Foreign students and
scholars constitute a tiny proportion of the 30 million foreign visitors who enter the
United States annually with visas, and a minuscule proportion of the hundreds of
millions who cross our borders legally each year . Whatever degree of monitoring of foreign visitors may
be necessary, we cannot pretend that we protect ourselves by applying it only to this small group. Monitoring
systems will never reveal people's intentions . There is no substitute for the
intelligence community being able to identify dangerous people before they get
here. Absent that, we will always be blind. The threat we face is very serious. Our nation's response must be equally so. Daunting
foreign policy, military, intelligence, and security challenges confront us. The job now is to focus the nation's attention and resources
Link Turn
Foreign students key to build up the goodwill necessary to
deter terrorism
NAFSA 03, NAFSA: Association of International Educators, In Americas Interest:
Welcoming International Students January 2001,
<http://www.nafsa.org/uploadedFiles/NAFSA_Home/
Resource_Library_Assets/Public_Policy/in_america_s_interest.pdf>
Secretary Powell has spoken eloquently of the foreign policy benefits that accrue to the United States from being
the destination of choice for the worlds internationally mobile students and, especially, from educating successive
gain access to the United States by posing as students? Of course there is; that danger exists with respect to all
nonimmigrant visitors, of which students constitute only a minuscule two percent. All countries must confront a
central question of our age, which is how to reconcile global mobility with global terrorism .
Openness to mobility carries dangers; higher education wants to be a part of the greater attention to these dangers
that is now necessary, and of the more robust enforcement measures that are now required. In this context, the
task force fully supports appropriate screening and monitoring measures. Schools are collectively spending millions
of dollars and countless hours to implement the international student tracking system that became a federal
priority on September 11. They are working with the Department of State to protect the integrity of student visas
and to prevent their fraudulent use by those who seek access to the United States for illegitimate reasons. Research
institutions are wrestling with questions of access to sensitive scientific information and are doing their best to
strike the appropriate balance. In these and other ways, higher education is doing its part to help protect our
But to unduly restrict the access of future leadersand, indeed, the youth of
the worldto this country is to court a greater danger , which is to nurture the
isolationism, fundamentalism, and bigoted caricatures that drive antiWestern terrorism. After September 11, it seems clear that the more people who can
experience this country first-hand, breaking down the stereotypes they grow up with
and opening their minds to a world beyond their borders, the better it is for U.S.
security
country.
Dealing with Foreign Students and Scholars in the Age of Terrorism: Visa Backlogs
and Tracking Systems, 3/26/03,
<http://www.princeton.edu/president/tilghman/speeches/20030326/>
As was so clearly articulated in the Hart-Rudman report, Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change , a
robust system of research and education is our greatest defense against
terrorism . The report calls the current investment in research and development a consumption of the capital
of the past three generations, pointing out that the U.S. need for the highest quality human
capital in science, mathematics, and engineering is not being met. It goes on to explain
that: American students know that professional careers in basic science and mathematics require considerable
NonU.S. nationals, however, do find these professions attractive and, thanks to science,
math, and technical preparation superior to that of many Americans, they
increasingly fill American university graduate studies seats and job slots in these
preparation and effort, while salaries are often more lucrative in areas requiring less demanding training.
areas.
So, while we make national and institutional efforts to attract American students to careers in science
and work to improve K-12 education to produce more Americans who have the capabilities necessary to excel in
universities, and they enrich the cultural diversity of our campuses. Given the global nature of business, the
economy, education, and the scientific enterprise, cultural diversity on our campuses pays important dividends to
our entire society; it is imperative to the future success of our graduates and the international leadership and
stability of our nation. Foreign-born scientists have, for more than 50 years, helped the U.S. achieve the preeminence in science and technology that has led to our strong economic growth and long-term national security.
Almost 20 percent of the distinguished scientists and engineers who are members
of the National Academy of Sciences, and more than a third of U.S. Nobel Laureates,
are foreign born. I, too, am a foreign-born scientist, having been raised and educated in Canada prior to my
graduate studies at Temple University. According to the 2002 Science and Engineering Indicators, nearly a third of
the doctoral degrees in science and engineering awarded in the U.S. each year go to foreign nationals, with well
over 40 percent of the doctoral degrees in engineering and computer science earned by foreign students. Twothirds of foreign students who receive a Ph.D. in science or engineering stay in the U.S., taking positions in
academia and industry, and nearly 40 percent of the current U.S. engineering faculty is foreign-born. Despite the
important contributions that foreign students and scholars have made and continue to make to U.S. advances in
science and technology, we are all painfully aware that at least three of the 19 September 11th hijackers were
attending U.S. flight schools on student visas when they committed their heinous acts. And we know from the 1993
bombing of the World Trade Center that others exploited weaknesses in the student non-immigrant visa program