Dr.

Parasaran Rangarajan
January 18th, 2016

Basics Of The United States Of America At The United Nations Human Rights
Council
Introduction
Comparatively time consuming to read, this paper for todays international
peace and security, only provides a basic rational legal analysis of the United States of
America Government (U.S.)s current international legal human rights situation due to
its use of electromagnetic/chemical weapons, with a short section for likely political
results.
With investigation reports, by agencies like the International Police (Interpol) and
United Nations (U.N.) accredited non-governmental organisations (NGOs) transmitted to
member-States of the U.N.; there is mass credible evidence the U.S. is currently
committing crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity including war crimes, as
well as serious violations of international law.
The U.S. is committing crimes on its own territory against U.S. nationals, on the
territory of other member-States of the U.N. -- of which some are International Criminal
Court (ICC) member-States -- on territory of U.N. Headquarters in New York City
including its international U.N. Offices, and on foreign territory of many Permanent
Missions to the U.N.
Domestic judicial mechanisms are not credible, since the U.S. Governments
Executive is directly interfering in the judiciary, in order to shield itself and those
carrying out genocide from prosecution. The principles rule of law, democracy,
separation of powers, credible domestic justice, upholding the U.S. Constitution have
eroded, and a national security state based on atheist/white supremacism has been created
in the land of immigrants.
Since 2009, the following international legislations and human right laws are just
some which the U.S. has violated against U.S. nationals on U.S. territory (in order of use
in the paper):
1. Chemical Weapons Convention (1997);
2. Protocol For The Prohibition Of The Use In War Of Asphyxiating, Poisonous Or
Other Gases, And Other Methods Of Warfare (1925);
3. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948);

4. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC),

including the Kyoto Protocol (1997);
5. U.N. Charter (1945);
6. Customary international law;
7. Arms Trade Treaty (2013);
8. U.N. Security Council Resolutions and U.N. General Assembly Resolutions;
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment
or Punishment (1984);
10. First, Second, Third, and Fourth Geneva Conventions on the Protection of
Civilians During Times or War (1949);
11. The Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly
Relations and Cooperation Among States (1970);
12. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1976);
13. Rome Statute (2002);
14. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948);
15. U.N. Conventions on the Peaceful Exploration and Use of Outer Space;
16. Convention On The Law Of The Seas (UNCOLS);
17. Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States Regarding the
Headquarters of the United Nations (1947);
18. Violations of the agreements, protocols, and the jus cogens of international
organisations, as well as bi-lateral treaties;
19. Chicago Convention (1944);
20. General Agreement On Trade and Tariffs (1947);
21. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961);
22. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally
Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents (1973); and

23. Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations.

Therefore, a resolution establishing an Independent International Commission of
Inquiry (IICOI) to investigate and verify existing information on this specific situation,
where credible information is available since 2009, is to be passed by the 47 memberState U.N. Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in its upcoming session in March of 2016.
The final report of the U.N. Human Rights Council Resolution in March of 2017,
will recommend referral of the U.S., to the independent 123 member-State International
Criminal Court, where jurisdiction is established due to the listed violations against U.N.
Headquarters in New York City. In this situation, full justice for victims can be
expected in around 5 years due to the deployment of a U.N. Peacekeeping Contingent to
the Americas within 2 years.
A U.N. Human Rights Council Report will guide other organs of the U.N. to
establish an International Criminal Tribunal (ICT), including help by complimentary
domestic courts, via a unanimous 2/3rd vote at the U.N. General Assembly under Article
22 of the U.N. Charter (1945), and U.N. Peacekeeping Contingent for the Americas
under U.N. General Assembly Resolution 377 (Uniting for Peace), to expedite
procedures.
Tomes of reports from U.N. agencies, and other international organisations such
as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), are also available.
International negotiations for ending the crimes have failed and a hostage
emergency of accredited diplomats being tortured, is ongoing. However, there is a near
100% guarantee all diplomatic hostages will be released to their sending-State
comfortably and safely after the U.N. Human Rights Council Resolution against the U.S.,
thanks to the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM).
Electromagnetic And Chemical Weapons
Electromagnetic weapons are bio-lethal weapons which are used wirelessly, have
been used against millions of civilians, and U.S. nationals on U.S. territory for purposes
of:
1. Attacking ones physical body by emitting dangerous wireless waves.
2. Attacking ones physical body by emitting dangerous wireless electric shocks.
3. Inducing auditory/visual effects in the brain by laser weapons.
4. Causing heating of ones physical body by wireless heat waves, including
watercuring, a form of waterboarding by wireless heat waves to the
mouth/throat for death via drinking large amounts of water, resulting in
poisoning.

5.

Reading the mind in thought and words by picking up brainwaves/CNS

waves, which are emitted by every living organism.

6.

Using laser weapons to transmit holograms.

7. Toxic gases and/or chemical malodorants causing sleep/asphyxiation -- even

when used lightly -- via gas lasers, which are chemical weapons, within the
definition of the Chemical Weapons Convention (1997), and crimes under
the Protocol For The Prohibition Of The Use In War Of Asphyxiating,
Poisonous Or Other Gases, And Other Methods Of Warfare (1925).
Each of the mentioned effects causes, or can cause; serious bodily or mental
harm, measures intended to prevent births, and other acts of genocide set in Article
II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
(1948).
It is well-known all parts of our body, from organs to individual cells, emit energy
via signals at various frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum. Electromagnetic
technology, has been existent since the 1970s, as various wireless
electroencephalography (EEG) devices were patented by U.S. Corporations to read the
mind, alter consciousness, etc; according to records of the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office. Military officers of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) used
the weapons when the USSR was fighting in Afghanistan during the Cold War, according
to the Psychotechnology Institute of Moscow.
The mentioned military weapons can also cause manmade climate change,
destruction of buildings, and are for military use only; with present defence development
programmes by many nations.
Some bio-lethal effects of electromagnetic weapons are explained in U.S.
Department of the Army Documents and U.S. Presidential Policy Directive PPD/28,
which authorises its intelligence agencies to use bio-lethal radioactive signal technology
advances against civilians. The U.S. Government is using the Directive for killing
civilians and internationally protected persons such as diplomats of governments on basis
of nationality, ethnicity, race or religion. These crimes against humanity are acts of
bio-terrorism and human experimentation.
Electromagnetic weapons have been deliberately used for tampering with the
environment such as moving clouds, etc; in violation of the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), including the Kyoto Protocol (1997).
These weapons and any device capable of biological harm to the human body,
have been expressly banned in the U.S. since 2003 with only one act; Public Order
256 in Michigan which is being disregarded, an example of the executive and armed
forces interfering in the legislature.

An earlier European Union (E.U.) Resolution in 1999 condemned the U.S. "High
Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP) and Non-lethal Weapons",
inclusive of various documents on psychotronic weapons by the U.N. around 2004.
E.U. Directive 95/46/EU expressly states that processing of genetic data is
protected in Article 9 (1) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation (2014), and
biometric data is subject to assessment, as per Article 33 (2) (d) since both are treated
a personal data. Brainwaves would fall under the category of biometric data and
genetic data, since genes are expressed in the brain through a biological process.
If used for civil purposes, similar to nuclear technology, the advantages to
humanity are vast. For example; viruses from the simple cold, which has no cure just as
any other virus, to viruses like cancer can be cured.
My analysis of this technology as a victim since 2009 led me to the conclusion
that by neutralising improper signals from a cancer cells nucleus with 24/7
electromagnetic therapy, where abnormal DNA/RNA made of proteins are stored,
malignancy cannot continue. Similar therapies can be developed for all other viruses, a
true medical breakthrough in history. Previous radiation technology could not operate at
all frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum, emit all bands of strength, nor pinpoint
non-intrusive signals to the genome level.
U.N. Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions;
recently stated existing international legislation can prosecute those who use
electromagnetic technology, which is well-known since it has been researched for
decades, as a weapon in an interview with the International Law Journal of London.
However, U.N. Offices, in consultation with civil society and member-States as per
procedure, will be developing guidelines for proper civil use. A U.N. Convention on
Electromagnetic Weapons and Devices, proposed by myself in November of 2014 -received well by senior international legal scholars, will be useful.
Instead of proper civil use of the electromagnetic technology, the U.S. is using it
as weapons. The U.S. Government; which is a threat to peace by attacking civilians of
many nations with electromagnetic/chemical weapons, has failed to uphold its primary
responsibility for maintenance of international peace and security as a permanent
member of the U.N. Security Council, and has committed many other violations of the
U.N. Charter (1945).
Many legally binding U.N. Security Council Resolutions like the Arms Trade
Treaty (2013), including U.N. General Assembly Resolutions which are customary
international law such as the The Declaration on Principles of International Law
Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation Among States (1970)", have been
violated.

Other nations such as the Canadian government and Israeli government are
aiding/abetting the U.S. Governments genocide. Individual government
employees, where their governments have not allied with this policy, have also been
found to be doing the same, along with large international civil entities.
Genocidal Acts
All acts of genocide stipulated in Article III of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) have been committed by
the U.S.:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.
It is not required that murder occur be charged with the crime of genocide,
since war criminals have been charged under other sections of as the definition set in
Article II:
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,
as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about
its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
By precedent and practice, it has been genocide is only charged by prosecutors
of an International Criminal Tribunal and the ICC, when the deaths fulfill gravity
requirements of a few hundred civilians deaths due to acts of the defendant, under Article
II (a).
Genocidal acts for which the U.N. Human Rights Council is being utilised are for
subsections; (a) Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; and (d) Attempt to
commit genocide of Article III of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of
the Crime of Genocide (1948), committed by the U.S. on national, ethnical, racial or
religious grounds, to destroy, in whole or in part various groups.
Express legal terminology such as groups, and phrases are defined in Article
II and Article III.

Genocide
Civilians are being chemically gassed with the toxic chemical maloderants, at
times being the smell of their stereotypical national foods mixed with other chemical
maloderants several times a day, causing sleep/vomiting and asphyxiation, when
used lightly itself, by gas lasers in line with the definition of chemical weapons in
the Chemical Weapons Convention (1997).
This demonstrates not intent for the crime against humanity of torture
but for genocide with the mens rea of discriminatory intent and murder -due repeated attacks multiple times daily in order to destroy in whole or in part, a
nationalgroup.
The actus reus is being committed against various groups, including U.S.
nationals on U.S. territory. This is as set in the Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).
Electromagnetic attacks and chemical weapon attacks are multiple times a day
against each U.S. national, including sexual assaults of wireless electric shocks to the
genitals. Attacks are different for each of the specific groups.
Many have died due to electromagnetic weapon and chemical weapon attacks by
the U.S.
Therefore, following sections of Article II apply:
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about
its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
One reason U.S. acts are not simple war crimes is due to the gravity of the
situation. Millions of victims internationally, who are not U.S. nationals, are also being
affected, by and via, electromagnetic weapons as well as chemical weapons, on a
national, ethnical, racial or religious basis specified in Article II.
Serious crimes against humanity of torture and human experimentation
establish that the crimes are within scope of the Convention against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984). However, acts are
being committed with discriminatory intent, legally establishing genocide.
Human experimentation is being committed in many ways against U.S.
nationals on U.S. territory; including sleep experiments, acoustic orders by
electromagnetic weapons with death threats, holograms broadcasted to the mind for

influencing behavior, watercuring or when the throat is constantly dried with heat so
deadly or abnormal amounts of water is consumed resulting in poisoning -- a form of
waterboarding, chemical weapons causing sleep/asphyxiation even when used at
low levels, incorrect medical treatment, and war crimes set in the First, Second,
Third, and Fourth Geneva Conventions on the Protection of Civilians During Times or
War (1949) including its additional protocols, etc.
Use of the mentioned weapons have been specialised for immigrants or second
generation civilians of other foreign descent, including civilians of foreign nations the
U.S. is victimising across borders, adding additional counts of genocide.
Asians have been victimised more via electromagnetic weapons on discriminatory
grounds. This includes attacks every day via the mentioned weapons on family members
and/or friends from nations they immigrated from; constituting terrorist attacks
against foreign nations, in violation of the U.N. Charter (1945) with regards to the
inviolable sovereignty of states.
Foreign nations have sent security and international observers with U.N.
assistance, to document crimes for resolving the situation peacefully via international
law, rather than exercising the right of self-defence under Article 51 of the U.N.
Charter (1945). Even several foreign Heads of State and Royal Families have been
victimised.
There are many more people who are of mixed ethnicity or race from when the
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was adopted
by the U.N. in 1948; since the world is much more interconnected today.
Via targeting bi-lingual civilians; the U.S. is committing multiple counts of
genocide, since each U.S. national, regardless of foreign ancestry is being tortured and
chemically gassed on basis of the language of that ethnicity, without having ancestry
of that ethnical group.
The U.S. is targeting U.S. nationals, even if they have small differences in
language, such as variances between British English and American English. This is in
addition to acts of genocide for being a U.S. national. Therefore, the U.S. Government
is targeting civilians on the sole basis of being part of a linguistic group, in this
specific situation.
Thousands of deaths have been specific to groups. This is because since they
were murdered via use of the mentioned weapons as a part of discriminatory acts.
Murders have been committed either directly, or indirectly, where the acts of one
person which leads to the death of another, linked with use of the mentioned weapons.
The number of deaths of U.S. nationals due to U.S. acts, satisfies the gravity
threshold for genocide, as per customary international law. The U.S. will also be
charged for each count of genocide against every group.

Genocide by killing members of the group has been committed for centuries
by the U.S. Government with discriminatory intent against Africans and colored
civilians, since independence of the U.S.
Therefore, crimes against humanity of slavery, apartheid, persecution
murders, and illegal imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty of
Africans as well as other colored civilians, constitute several counts of genocide
against colored civilians by the U.S. today. This era of U.S. history is well documented.
Conspiracy To Commit Genocide, Attempt To Commit Genocide, And Forcibly
Transferring Children Of The Group To Another Group
The U.S. is also guilty of Article III (b)(c); conspiracy to commit genocide and
attempt to commit genocide since various crimes against humanity, including
extermination as defined in Article 7 of the Rome Statute (2002), have not
victimised of some groups, in whole as defined in the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948). This is due to association
with the U.S. Government. Safety of civilians who are not associated with the U.S.
Government, is attributed to pragmatic security provided by foreign governments and
international agencies.
U.S. laws created to target Africans are violations of the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights (1976), almost in full, also a war crime of
degradation under Article 8 (2)(b)(xxi)/Article 8 (2)(c)(ii) of the Rome Statute
(2002).
Examining development of U.S. history in relation with its laws, colored civilians
are majority U.S. jails/prisons, which has more prisoners than any other nation.
Colored civilians are imprisoned on a discriminatory and arbitrary basis in
violation of International Bill of Human Rights; a crime against humanity stipulated
in Article 7 of the Rome Statute (2002). These crimes against humanity with
discriminatory intent, are in violation of Article III (b)(d) of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).
Acts of genocide defined in Article II apply in full to the crimes against
humanity of apartheid, persecution, and legislating with discriminatory intent
against colored civilians for purposes of violating the following, but not limited to, part of
Article 7 of the Rome Statute (2002); imprisonment or other severe deprivation of
physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law. Children are also
imprisoned on the same basis.
International legislation allowing retroactivity will be invoked to the extent
permissible by the ICT, and tracing back to 2002 as allowed by the ICC.

Direct And Public Incitement To Commit Genocide

Violations of Article III (c) of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment
of the Crime of Genocide (1948) have occurred, since acoustic waves from
electromagnetic weapons have been used by the U.S. Government directing civilians
(including children) to join the genocide, specialised for every nationality, ethnicity,
race or religion.
Many civilians have been threatened publically with their lives, to participate in
the genocide by joining the U.S. Government, conducting certain acts, etc. This
reinforces legal basis for why there are multiple counts of genocide; since one race or
the like, is directed to partake in another count of genocide against another.
Individual And Corporate Complicity
Corporations, investors, and/or employees with knowledge their company
and/or superiors acts are funding the U.S. Government, or assisting their criminal acts
are complicit.
Unlike previous situations, this genocide is with knowledge of every
employee working in the U.S.; making all employees/supporters, since they are
aiding/abetting the genocide, as per the principles of individual criminal
responsibility and Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE), set in Article 25 of the Rome
Statute (2002).
One does not need to directly have a connection to the crime, but indirectly,
via their managers and/or corporations; including foreign corporations providing any
consideration. This principle only applies to private security and private military
contractors/groups, if their intent is to aid/abet the genocide.
Professional sports leagues and Hollywood/Media Corporations, including their
popular employees, are held accountable to the same level of criminal liability. In this
instance, the war crime of degradation is linked with sexually oriented media which
is distorted, then passed on to the auditory and visual cortexes of our brain/CNS by
electromagnetic weapons -- serious crimes against humanity of human
experimentation.
Consumers can also be considered investors if capital invested is comparatively
on the same level of premier shareholders.
Doctors, lawyers, employees, classmates, etc; which victims are able to contact,
are either agents, or are working with the U.S. Government for aiding/abetting.
Known persons who may be able to help, are kept distanced via U.S. management of all
information communication technology, and enforced on the ground by its agents.

Principles of criminal law for using the doctrine of duress as a defence for
murder and torture are very strict; did the person have opportunities to escape
instead of committing the crime, to what level did the person aid/abet, etc.
Public official responsibility as set in various U.N. Conventions and customary
international law, has a higher threshold of responsibility, for all government employees.
Some of the legal principles of aiding/abetting are established in the International
Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTfY) and International Criminal Tribunal
for Rwanda (ICTR).
War Crimes And Serious Violations Of International Law
War crimes of violations of the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Geneva
Conventions on the Protection of Civilians During Times or War (1949) include;
denying basic medicines within framework of U.S. laws, attacking hospitals with the
mentioned weapons, using insignias improperly, denying certain foods on discriminatory
grounds, educational institutions such as Harvard University controlled by the
government, public degradation with an example being performing incorrect religious
rites, etc.
Additionally, the U.S. is holding entire diplomatic families, who are victims to the
genocide, hostage. Hostages are deprived of the right to freedom of movement, meet
persons of choice, etc in violation of the International Bill of Human Rights.
The International Bill of Human Rights consists of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (1948), including the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (1976) on the right to enter/exit ones own nation, among many other war
crimes due to violations of the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Geneva Conventions
on the Protection of Civilians During Times or War (1949).
Abuse of information communication technology as weapons for committing
crimes internationally violates the various U.N. Conventions on the Peaceful
Exploration and Use of Outer Space, as well as the Convention On The Law Of
The Seas (UNCOLS); since electromagnetic weapons on land use signal
communications with satellites in outer space, including via communication cables in the
deep sea.
The U.S. is also using children for conducting hostilities and crimes, using
prostitutes -- including child prostitutes -- to convey to the international community that
hostages are receiving everything they require. However, every act by a hostage, material
to a hostage, etc; must be cleared by the U.S. As a hostage with a family, we are
exercising full non-cooperation with those committing these crimes.
Interpol has documented mass evidence of the mentioned crimes by U.S.
Governments employees, against specially protected civilians defined in the First,

Second, Third, and Fourth Geneva Conventions on the Protection of Civilians During
Times or War (1949).
The Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States Regarding the
Headquarters of the United Nations (1947) and Negotiated Relationship Agreement
between the International Criminal Court and the United Nations (2004), allows for the
ICC to exercise jurisdiction based on all submitted documents including the U.N. Human
Rights Councils Report on this situation.
There are many more serious violations of the agreements, protocols, and the jus
cogens of international organisations such as the International Civil Aviation
Organisation (ICAO) relative to the Chicago Convention (1944) by attacking
international aircrafts, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) which was established by
the General Agreement On Trade and Tariffs (1947) by hindering legal trade between
nations, intellectual property rights for which the World Intellectual Property
Organisation (WIPO) was created, laws of the Universal Postal Union (UPU), customary
international law, etc.
Even after new elections in the U.S. and warrants issued for many counts of
genocide by the 123 nation ICC, U.S. leaders will continue to be wanted for the
continuous war crime of degradation, due to of attacks on dignity from genocide
under Article 8 (2)(b)(xxi) as well as Article 8 (2)(c)(ii) of the Rome Statute (2002).
Its leaders will also be wanted for continuous war crime" of enlisting
children under 15 years of age, violation of Article 8 (2)(e)(vii) of the Rome Statute
(2002), due to the U.S. Armed Forces policy of training and recruiting children under
age of 15 for war, based on policy via its Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps
(JROTC).
Additionally, U.S. leaders will be wanted for crimes against humanity of
imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental
rules of international law, persecution, and apartheid stipulated in Article 7 of the
Rome Statute (2002), on a discriminatory and arbitrary basis against colored
civilians, which are in violation of the International Bill of Human Rights; additional
counts of genocide against the U.S.
ICC warrants for leaders of a nation, especially the Head of State under Article 28
of the Rome Statute (2002), makes diplomatic ties with the 123 member-States of the
ICC impossible until credible international criminal justice is completed.
War crimes and serious violations of international law being committed,
contribute to the ongoing genocide.

Complicity In Genocide
Israeli leaders, who have also been referred to the ICC, due to the continuous
war crime of illegal occupation, are evacuating the State of Palestine, so Israel
remains recognised. They are also being charged with serious crimes against humanity
with discriminatory intent for acts in the Gaza War of 2014; genocide for which the
ICC accepted the State of Palestines retroactive jurisdiction for prosecuting Israeli
leaders.
The Gaza War of 2014 left around 2,500 Palestinian civilians dead (nearly half
children), and around 10,000 Palestinian civilians injured due to the Israeli Defence
Forces (IDF) accuracy rate of around 30% estimated by the U.N.
Article III (e) of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of Genocide (1948); complicity in genocide, applies to the U.S. It supplied arms
during the war to Israel with knowledge of serious war crimes and crimes against
humanity announced by the U.N., after all other nations stopped. This was admitted by
the U.S. Government itself and is a violation of Article 25 of the Rome Statute (2002),
via aiding/abetting. It is also in violation of Article 6 (3) and Article 7 of the Arms
Trade Treaty (2013).
In addition, the U.S. committed serious crimes against humanity against both
civilians and diplomats who were working for a ceasefire in the Gaza War of 2014, via its
ongoing genocide by increased use of electromagnetic weapons against these persons
-- especially laser holograms of snakes, spiders, dead persons, etc -- with support
including sounds/heat for realistic experiences. These are also acts of human
experimentation.
The inviolable sovereignty of U.N. Offices and foreign missions in the U.S.
were attacked during the war, violations of the; Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
Relations (1961), Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against
Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents (1973), and
Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations. These are also
terrorist attacks by Israeli and U.S. Governments in violation of the U.N. Charter
(1945)
It is interesting to note the U.N. Security Council followed the African Union
(A.U.) Resolution on protecting the Sudanese President from the ICC for the genocide
in Darfur, by not including arrests of ICC warrants in the U.N. Peacekeeping Contingent
mandate.
However, the U.S. is not a member of the A.U., nor can the European Union
(E.U.) protect the U.S. from the ICC, as per its agreement on Article 98 waivers of the
Rome Statute (2002).

Political Independence
Several member-States of the U.N have formally recognised the southern half of
the former U.S. as a separate state, along with the Kingdom of Hawaii as a separate
state, pursuant to my legal advice and assistance.
Every legally binding International Court of Justice (ICJ) order in history, has
been followed. The ICJ rendered an order in the contentious case of Nicaragua v.
United States (1986), legally binding upon the parties.
This order set that the sovereignty of a state cannot be violated, only as so
far as the state follows the principle of equal rights and self-determination of
peoples. Now that this matter is relevant, the U.S. will conform or lose its U.N.
Charter (1945) rights to sovereignty.
The Kingdom of Hawaii has already won a non-legally binding order from
U.N. Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), proving it was illegally annexed by the U.S.
in the early 1950s, as per the ruling rendered under international law.
Both countries are working for full independence, due to these crimes and other
crimes by the U.S. Government, as the U.N. completes its work for peace and justice,
likely within the next 5 years or earlier.
If a vote is held at the U.N. Security Council regarding the U.S. for any reason
involving human rights, relative to another member-State of the U.N. Security Council,
the U.S. must cast an obligatory abstention vote as set in Article 27 (3) of the U.N.
Charter (1945), since it is a party to the direct dispute.
It also may be that the international community, already involved in U.N. Security
Council Reforms, may request that a change of representation is mandated for the U.S.
at the U.N., depending on new developments.
The U.N. Headquarters is relocating to another member-State due to violations of
bi-lateral agreements by the U.S., continuing genocide against civilians, its diplomats,
and against foreign diplomats of member-States.
Conclusion
The U.S, with direct complicity from Canada and Israel, are committing many
counts/acts of the serious crime of genocide; strictly within the definition of the crime
set in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
(1948).
ICC jurisdiction is established on U.S. territory due to crimes against U.N. Offices
including U.N. Headquarters, U.N. Missions, and diplomats working in the U.S.

Previously mentioned, an ICT is also to be established via a unanimous 2/3rd vote

at the U.N. General Assembly under Article 22 of the U.N. Charter (1945) or via the
U.N. Security Council since many of the victimised nations, in this international
genocide, are not ICC member-States.
The U.N. General Assembly is also to invoke U.N. General Assembly Resolution
377 (Uniting for Peace) for establishment of a U.N. Peacekeeping Contingent for the
Americas in order to maintain international peace and security, if the U.N. Security
Council fails. Every ICT in history has and must been accompanied by the same.
The relatively new U.N. Human Rights Council, opinioned by some experts as an
internationalist instrument to targeting developing nations, is now to write one of the first
official chapters towards a more peaceful world, by undertaking the mission of creating
modern history.
There are only legal facts, based on truth without bias, in this analysis.
Note: Written as a current hostage and victim of 6-7 years documented by
international agencies. Look forward to meeting, at the earliest after the U.N.
Human Rights Council Sessions in March (2016), free.