Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
[29]
Author
Name
Wenmin Li
et al.
[7]
Govindarajan
.M
[4]
Brijain R Pat
et al.
Methods
used
C4.5,
CBA
and
CMAR
PC5.0
and
OC5.0
ID3,
C4.5,
C5.0
C4,
CART,
SLIQ
[12]
Manish
Mehta et al.
[21]
S. B.
Kotsiantis
[18]
Rafael S.
Parpinelli et
al.
Bing Liu et
al.
AntMiner
and CN2
CARs
Chuntao
Jiang et al.
WgSpan
[3]
[5]
SVMs
Results
CBA
Accuracy
C4.5
CMAR
84.69
%
PC5.0
0.5%
83.34
%
Turney et al.
[17]
Qiaozhu Mei
et al.
[11]
Manimaran
et al.
[10]
Manimaran
et al.
[22]
Sakurai et al.
[25]
Ur-Rahman
et al.
PMI-IR
Versus
LSA on
TOEFL
Hidden
Markov
models
ARM
Apriori
algorith
m
IDTF
and
SVM
C4.5,
KNN,
Nave
Bayes
and
SVM
for classification
The comparison results
that it suggesting several
new hypotheses that are
worth investigating.
It compares the relative
strength
of
different
themes
To
identify
some
interesting
correlation
measures as lift, chisquared, hyper-lift, hyperconfidence and conviction
To examine text data by
using ARM technique
IDTF gave high precision
ratios in the classification
than SVM
In KNN, Nave Bayes and
SVM, MKTPKS gave
better accuracies than
simple term classification
model
[24]
85.22
%
OC5.0
7.2%
[16]
[17]
[18]
CONCLUSION
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
44