Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Psychology, Seeley G. Mudd Building Room 501, University of Southern California, 3620 South McClintock Ave., 90089-1061, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Department of Psychology, Ohio University, 245 Porter Hall, 45701, Athens, OH, USA
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 November 2012
Received in revised form 7 March 2013
Accepted 18 March 2013
Available online 25 March 2013
Keywords:
Cardiovascular reactivity
Blunting
Abdominal obesity
Chronic stress
Body-mass index
a b s t r a c t
Abdominal obesity and chronic stress have independent effects on cardiac autonomic regulation, and may
also interact to inuence cardiovascular reactivity. In addition to main effects, we hypothesized that abdominal obesity and chronic stress would interact and predict blunted cardiovascular reactivity. One hundred and
twenty-two undergraduate students engaged in two stressful laboratory tasks while cardiovascular activity
was assessed. Results indicated that higher abdominal obesity signicantly predicted blunted systolic blood
pressure (SBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) change, while chronic stress was not directly associated
with any measure of cardiovascular reactivity. Furthermore, there was a signicant interaction between abdominal obesity and chronic stress on SBP and MAP change such that among participants with higher chronic
stress, higher abdominal obesity was signicantly associated with reduced SBP and MAP reactivity. In addition, body-mass index (BMI), a measure of overall obesity, also had both main and interaction effects with
chronic stress to predict blunted cardiovascular reactivity. These results suggest that abdominally obese individuals may incur difculty in mounting appropriately-sized cardiovascular responses during acute stress,
particularly when under high levels of chronic stress.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Rates of obesity have been increasing dramatically worldwide. Its
prevalence has doubled in the United States (Stein and Colditz, 2004)
and tripled in developing countries (Hossain et al., 2007) since the
1970s. As prevalence rates increase, the health and economic costs
of obesity continue to mount. In the United States, the direct and indirect cost of obesity is estimated to be over 215 billion dollars per
year (Hammond and Levine, 2010). Excessive weight gain is closely
tied to the rising prevalence of a number of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, stroke, and cancer
(Hossain et al., 2007).
Whereas generalized obesity is characterized by an overall accumulation of adipose tissue spread throughout the body, abdominal obesity
refers to high levels of fat accumulation centered primarily in the abdominal region. Although these two forms of adiposity have been demonstrated to be highly correlated (Goldbacher et al., 2005), they may
also exist independently of each other. For example, some evidence
suggests that being lean but having higher abdominal fat is especially
We would like to thank the following students and colleagues for their assistance
with data collection: Stacy Eisenburg, Uta Maeda, Emily Kamen, Jessica Matlock, Jon
Arrington, Kelsey Rupp, Farva Jafri, and Danny Liu.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 415 246 0394; fax: +1 213 746 9082.
E-mail addresses: Kulwinds@usc.edu (K. Singh), Shenb@ohio.edu (B.-J. Shen).
1
Tel.: +1 740 593 1086; fax: +1 740 593 0579.
0167-8760/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.03.010
associated with risk for earlier death (Larsson et al., 1984). Also, obese
individuals may possess high levels of adipose tissue throughout the entire body in the absence of a relatively high accumulation of centralized
abdominal fat. In addition, the measurement of both generalized and
abdominal obesity also differs. Generalized obesity is typically measured by body-mass index (BMI), a measure based on an individual's
weight and height, with obesity dened as a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or higher.
Abdominal obesity can be measured using a variety of methods that are
either invasive (e.g., DEXA scan) or non-invasive (e.g., measuring tape).
Non-invasive assessment of abdominal obesity typically includes either
the measurement of individuals' waist-circumference (WC) alone, or
the assessment of both WC and hip-circumference (HC) to calculate
the ratio of the circumference of the waist to the hips, commonly
known as waist-to-hip ratio (WHR).
Abdominal obesity confers additional health risks above and beyond those associated with generalized obesity, including an increased risk of hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, coronary
heart disease, diabetes, lipoprotein alterations and overall cardiovascular disease morbidity (Ammar et al., 2008; Despres et al., 1990; Lee
et al., 2008). These associations are independent of other contributing
risk factors such as high cholesterol, smoking, education, race, age,
and obesity dened by BMI (Freedman et al., 1995).
Although abdominal obesity has been recognized as a signicant risk
factor for chronic disease, the mechanisms by which it may lead to negative health outcomes remain poorly understood. Cardiovascular reactivity has been suggested as a potential mechanism linking abdominal
74
75
76
Table 2
Correlation matrix of obesity and chronic stress.
Waist-circumference
Body mass index
Waist-to-hip ratio
ICSRLE-M
ICSRLE-A
ICSRLE-TOT
WC
BMI
WHR
ICSRLE-M
ICSRLE-A
ICSRLE-TOT
.92
.84
.00
.12
.06
.66
.02
.11
.07
.06
.10
.03
.44
.92
.66
p b .001) and intensity (r = .67, p b .001). Stress intensity and duration were also correlated (r = .44, p b .001). Chronic stress and anthropometric characteristics were not associated with each other.
3.4. Associations between baseline cardiovascular values and
change scores
Baseline HR (r = .21, p = .02), RSA (r = .56, p b .001), and
PEP (r = .36, p b .001) were signicantly and negatively associated
with their respective change scores. Baseline SBP, DBP, and MAP were
not associated with their corresponding change scores.
3.5. Abdominal obesity, chronic stress, and baseline cardiovascular
activity
Table 1
Sample characteristics and stress task effectiveness.
Total sample (N = 122)
Demographics
Gender
Female
Male
Age (years)
Ethnicity
Caucasian
Asian American
African American
Hispanic
Other
N (%)
87 (71%)
35 (29%)
20 1.70
27 (22%)
57 (47%)
9 (7%)
15 (12%)
14 (11%)
Anthropometric characteristics
Mean SD
Weight (kg)
Height (cm)
Body-mass index
Waist-to-hip ratio
Waist circumference (cm)
Hip circumference (cm)
Stressor characteristics
Baseline
HR (beats per minute)
SBP (mm Hg)
DBP (mm Hg)
MAP (mm Hg)
PEP (ms)
RSA
Change during stress tasks
HR
SBP
DBP
MAP
PEP
RSA
68.2 18.01
164.8 8.89
25.6 5.80
0.84 0.06
84.9 14.20
101.2 10.30
73.9 9.00
104.1 10.80
64.9 5.00
90.0 5.60
132.6 16.50
6.5 1.00
13.8 10.40
20.3 10.40
10.8 5.10
12.3 6.20
6.6 11.10
0.3 0.90
HR = Heart rate; SBP = Systolic blood pressure; DBP = Diastolic blood pressure;
MAP = Mean arterial pressure; PEP = Pre-ejection period; RSA = Respiratory sinus
arrhythmia.
p b .05.
p b .01.
p b .001.
Table 3
Hierarchical regression testing main effects and interaction of abdominal obesity and
chronic stress.
Step 2a
Baseline
HR
SBP
DBP
MAP
PEP
RSA
Change
HR
SBP
DBP
MAP
PEP
RSA
Step 3b
WC
Chronic
stress
WC
Chronic
stress
WC chronic
stress
.03
.34
.05
.13
.13
.16
.09
.08
.02
.29
.09
.22
.05
.004
.02
.12
.12
.16
.09
.09
.02
.08
.01
.04
.02
.14
.16
.12
.05
.08
.10
.02
.23
.16
.02
.07
.01
.03
.17
.10
.02
.05
.11
.01
.08
.27
.29c
.29
.10
.24
.06
.08
.18
.32
.17
.25
.01
.02
.03
.07
R2 change
.000
.003
.000
.001
.000
.01
.003
.04
.05
.05
.000
.003
a
Step 1 was not included, as it only contained covariates. Variables in Step 2 included
gender, age, self-reported exercise, WC, and total chronic stress. For change, baseline
cardiovascular variables were also included as covariates.
b
Variables in Step 3 included gender, age, self-reported exercise, WC, total chronic
stress, and the WC Stress interaction. For change models, baseline cardiovascular variables were also included as covariates. HR = Heart rate; SBP = Systolic blood pressure;
DBP Diastolic blood pressure; MAP = Mean arterial pressure, PEP = Pre-ejection period;
RSA = Respiratory sinus arrhythmia; WC = Waist-circumference; ICSRLE-TOT = Total
score of chronic stress scale; WC ICSRLE-TOT = WC Stress interaction.
c
Overall F-test for ANOVA was not signicant; interaction term reached signicance.
p b .05.
p b .01.
77
Fig. 2. Simple slopes analysis for MAP reactivity. Simple slopes of the association between abdominal obesity and mean arterial pressure (MAP) reactivity at 1 standard
deviation above mean chronic stress (high), mean chronic stress, and 1 standard deviation below mean chronic stress (low).
s.e. = .11, p = .01), but not at the mean or one standard deviation
below the mean. These results indicate that there was a stronger link
between abdominal obesity and cardiovascular reactivity among
those who reported concurrently high chronic stress compared to
those reporting average or low chronic stress. In addition, abdominal
obesity and cardiovascular reactivity were not associated among individuals with either a normal or low level of chronic stress.
3.6.1. BMI, WHR, and cardiovascular reactivity
Additional analyses were conducted to examine the associations between generalized obesity, abdominal obesity measured by WHR,
chronic stress, and cardiovascular reactivity. The results showed that
BMI was signicantly associated with increased baseline SBP ( = .42,
s.e. = .14, p b .001) and MAP ( = .32, s.e. = .09, p b .001). WHR
was not associated with baseline values across any cardiovascular
outcome variable. For cardiovascular reactivity, BMI signicantly predicted blunted SBP ( = .33, s.e. = .19, p = .01) and MAP change
( = .25, s.e. = .11, p = .02), but did not predict changes in other
cardiovascular variables. In addition, the BMI Stress interaction signicantly predicted blunted SBP ( = .29, s.e. = .001, p = .01) and
MAP change ( = .31, s.e. = .001, p = .01), but was nonsignicant
for HR, DBP, PEP, and RSA change. The WHR main effect and
WHR Stress interaction did not predict change across any cardiovascular variable.
The simple slopes analysis indicated that higher generalized obesity was signicantly associated with decreased SBP reactivity at one
standard deviation above the mean of chronic stress (b = .93,
s.e. = .37, p = .01), but not at the mean or one standard deviation
below the mean. For MAP reactivity, it was found that high generalized obesity was also signicantly associated with decreased reactivity
at one standard deviation above the mean of chronic stress
(b = .80, s.e. = .23, p b .001), but not at the mean or one standard
deviation below the mean. These results indicate that there was a
stronger link between generalized obesity and cardiovascular reactivity among those reporting concurrently high levels of chronic stress
compared to those reporting average or low chronic stress. In addition, the results for generalized obesity are similar to those for abdominal obesity. This outcome would be expected given the high
correlation between the two measures.
4. Discussion
Fig. 1. Simple slopes analysis for SBP reactivity. Simple slopes of the association between
abdominal obesity and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reactivity at 1 standard deviation
above mean chronic stress (high), mean chronic stress, and 1 standard deviation below
mean chronic stress (low).
Numerous studies have examined the association between cardiovascular reactivity, abdominal obesity, and chronic stress. However,
existing studies have only tested the individual effects of abdominal
obesity and chronic stress on cardiovascular reactivity. In this study,
we observed that abdominal obesity was not only associated with
smaller SBP and MAP change during stress tasks, but also interacted
with chronic stress to signicantly predict blunted SBP and MAP
change. Specically, individuals with concurrently high abdominal
78
cardiovascular outcomes (Huxley et al., 2009). In addition to the measurement of abdominal obesity, future studies examining the role of
obesity on cardiovascular regulation should carefully consider the assessment of generalized obesity as an additional anthropometric
measurement.
There are a few limitations in the current study that should be
noted. They also point to directions for future research. First, although
we had a fairly comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular functioning, we did not assess endocrinal functioning before and during
stress. Therefore, we were not able to test specic mechanisms that
may have potentially contributed to the observed moderation. The assessment of hormonal functioning before and during stress may have
also allowed us to explain the tendency for obese individuals to produce a blunted vascular (e.g., SBP, DBP, MAP) rather than cardiac response (e.g., HR, PEP, RSA). In fact, previous studies have suggested
that insulin, a sympatho-activating hormone that promotes vasoconstriction, may especially predispose obese individuals to express an
exaggerated vascular response to stress (Jern et al., 1992). The possibility exists, however, that with repeated and prolonged insulin exposure, obese individuals may become resistant to its sympathoactivating effects; thus producing a blunted vascular response. The
assessment of hormonal functioning may have allowed us to test
this specic mechanism. Second, although the rate of generalized
obesity, on the basis of BMI, in this sample was quite high (56 of
the total 122 [46%] participants), it is also important to note that
only 23 of the 122 (19%) participants met criteria for abdominal obesity. Thus, future studies should aim to include as many participants
with high abdominal obesity as possible. In addition, this study focused on the cross-sectional relationships between chronic stress, abdominal obesity, and cardiovascular responses to acute laboratory
stressors. Without longitudinal data over a longer period, we were
not able to determine the directionality of inuence among these variables. Finally, we were not able to examine the inuences of chronic
stress and abdominal obesity on recovery after stress. Prolonged recovery after stress exposure has been found to inuence long-term
cardiovascular health, and may even be a more useful predictor of
long-term blood-pressure changes than reactivity (Borghi et al.,
1986). Future studies examining the interaction of chronic stress
and obesity on cardiovascular reactivity should also test the inuences of these variables during a prolonged recovery period.
4.1. Conclusions
The current investigation was the rst to examine the interaction of
abdominal obesity and chronic stress on cardiovascular reactivity. We
tested cardiovascular activity across a multitude of measures in a particularly heavy sample. Since important exclusion criteria and statistical
controls were included, the pattern of ndings were unlikely attributable to a ceiling effect due to high baseline cardiovascular activity. Instead, our results suggest a blunted cardiovascular response system
among the obese, as they more frequently expressed blunted cardiovascular responses during acute stress compared to normal-weight participants. This effect was moderated by chronic stress such that obese
participants who were under high levels of chronic stress expressed a
particularly blunted cardiovascular stress response relative to obese
participants under moderate or low levels of stress.
References
Al'Absi, M., Bongard, S., Buchanan, T., Pincomb, G.A., Licinio, J., Lovallo, W.R., 1997.
Cardiovascular and neuroendocrine adjustment to public speaking and mental
arithmetic stressors. Psychophysiology 34, 266275.
Allen, M.T., Matthews, K.A., Sherman, F.S., 1997. Cardiovascular reactivity to stress and
left ventricular mass in youth. Hypertension 30, 782787.
Ammar, K.A., Redeld, M.M., Mahoney, D.W., Johnson, M., Jacobsen, S.J., Rodeheffer, R.J.,
2008. Central obesity: association with left ventricular dysfunction and mortality
in the community. American Heart Journal 156, 975981.
79
Light, K.C., Sherwood, A., Turner, J.R., 1992. High cardiovascular reactivity to stress: a
predictor of later hypertension development. In: Turner, J.R., Sherwood, A., Light,
K.C. (Eds.), Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Response to Stress. Plenum
Press, New York, NY, pp. 281292.
Maffeis, C., Pietrobelli, A., Grezzani, A., Provera, S., Tato, L., 2001. Waist circumference
and cardiovascular risk factors in prepubertal children. Obesity Research 9,
179187.
Marin, P., Darin, N., Amemiya, T., Andersson, B., Jern, S., Bjorntorp, P., 1992. Cortisol
secretion in relation to body fat distribution in obese premenopausal women.
Metabolism, Clinical and Experimental 41, 882886.
Matthews, K.A., Gump, B.B., Block, D.R., Allen, M.T., 1997. Does background stress
heighten or dampen children's cardiovascular responses to acute stress? Psychosomatic Medicine 59, 488496.
McEwen, B.S., 1998. Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. The
New York Academy of Sciences 840, 3344.
McEwen, B.S., Seeman, T., 1998. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators.
The New England Journal of Medicine 338, 171179.
Miller, G.E., Chen, E., Zhou, E.S., 2007. If it goes up, must it come down? Chronic stress
and the hypothalamicpituitaryadrenocortical axis in humans. Psychological
Bulletin 133, 2545.
Mills, P.J., Dimsdale, J.E., 1991. Cardiovascular reactivity to psychosocial stressors. A review of the effects of beta-blockade. Psychosomatics 32, 209220.
Neovius, M., Linne, Y., Rossner, S., 2004. BMI, waist-circumference and waisthip-ratio
as diagnostic tests for fatness in adolescents. International Journal of Obesity 29,
163169.
Phillips, A.C., 2011. Blunted cardiovascular reactivity relates to depression, obesity, and
self-reported health. Biological Psychology 86, 106113.
Phillips, A.C., Roseboom, T.J., Carroll, D., de Rooij, S.R., 2012. Cardiovascular and cortisol
reactions to acute psychological stress and adiposity: cross-sectional and prospective associations in the Dutch Famine Birth Cohort Study. Psychosomatic Medicine
74, 699710.
Piccirillo, G., Vetta, F., Fimognari, F., Ronzoni, S., Lama, J., Cacciafesta, M., Marigliano, V.,
1996. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability in obese subjects: evidence
of decreased cardiac sympathetic responsiveness. International Journal of Obesity
and Related Metabolic Disorders 20, 825829.
Pike, J.L., Smith, T.L., Hauger, R.L., Nicassio, P.M., Patterson, T.L., McClintick, J., Costlow,
C., Irwin, M.R., 1997. Chronic life stress alters sympathetic, neuroendocrine, and
immune responsivity to an acute psychological stressor in humans. Psychosomatic
Medicine 59, 447457.
Pouliot, M.C., Desprs, J.P., Lemieux, S., Moorjani, S., Bouchard, C., Tremblay, A., Nadeau,
A., Lupien, P.J., 1994. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best
simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation
and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. The American Journal of
Cardiology 73, 460468.
Price, G.M., Uauy, R., Breeze, E., Bulpitt, C.J., Fletcher, A.E., 2006. Weight, shape, and
mortality risk in older persons: elevated waisthip ratio, not high body mass
index, is associated with a greater risk of death. The American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition 84, 449460.
Qu, M., Zhang, Y., Webster, J.G., Tompkins, W.J., 1986. Motion artifact from spot and
band electrodes during impedance cardiography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical
Engineering 10291036.
Shen, B.J., Farrell, K.A., Penedo, F.J., Schneiderman, N., Orth-Gomer, K., 2010. Waist circumference moderates the association between marital stress and c-reactive protein in middle-aged healthy women. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 40, 258264.
Sherwood, A., Allen, M.T., Fahrenberg, J., Kelsey, R.M., Lovallo, W.R., van Doornen, L.J.,
1990. Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology
27, 123.
Stein, C.J., Colditz, G.A., 2004. The epidemic of obesity. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 89, 25222525.
Steptoe, A., Wardle, J., 2005. Cardiovascular stress responsivity, body mass and abdominal adiposity. International Journal of Obesity (London) 29, 13291337.
Straneva, P., Hinderliter, A., Wells, E., Lenahan, H., Girdler, S., 2000. Smoking, oral contraceptives, and cardiovascular reactivity to stress. Obstetrics and Gynecology 95,
7883.
Tentolouris, N., Tsigos, C., Perea, D., Koukou, E., Kyriaki, D., Kitsou, E., Daskas, S., Daifotis,
Z., Makrilakis, K., Raptis, S., 2003. Differential effects of high-fat and highcarbohydrate isoenergetic meals on cardiac autonomic nervous system activity in
lean and obese women. Metabolism, Clinical and Experimental 52, 14261432.
Treiber, F.A., Kamarck, T., Schneiderman, N., Shefeld, D., Kapuku, G., Taylor, T., 2003.
Cardiovascular reactivity and development of preclinical and clinical disease states.
Psychosomatic Medicine 65, 4662.
Uchino, B.N., Uno, D., Holt-Lunstad, J., Flinders, J.B., 1999. Age-related differences in
cardiovascular reactivity during acute psychological stress in men and women.
Journal of Gerontology 54, 339346.
Valdimarsdottir, H.B., Zakowski, S.G., Gerin, W., Mamakos, J., Pickering, T., Bovbjerg, D.H.,
2002. Heightened psychobiological reactivity to laboratory stressors in healthy
women at familial risk for breast cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 25, 5165.
Vazquez, G., Duval, S., Jacobs Jr., D.R., Silventoinen, K., 2007. Comparison of body mass
index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio in predicting incident diabetes: a
meta-analysis. Epidemiologic Reviews 29, 115128.
Waldstein, S.R., Burns, H.O., Toth, M.J., Poehlman, E.T., 1999. Cardiovascular reactivity
and central adiposity in older African Americans. Health Psychology 18, 221228.
Wei, M., Gaskill, S., Haffner, S., Stern, M., 1997. Waist circumference as the best predictor
of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) compared to body mass index,
waist/hip ratio and other anthropometric measurements in Mexican Americansa
7-year prospective study. Obesity Research 5, 1623.