Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
The technology of tailings dam design is based on the same geotechnical
principles as water dams, however the presence of saturated tailings solids as
the stored medium, versus water only, presents unique challenges and design
benefits. The gradation of mine tailings typically varies from silty medium fine
sand to clayey silt. Tailings dam design sections vary considerably. For example,
the dam can be made entirely out of unprocessed tailings with upstream
construction, or the dam may be made out of borrow material with little or no
reliance on the tailings. Impounded tailing solids have hydraulic conductivity and
shear strength properties that can be used to the advantage of the designer. On
the other hand, sulphide rich mine tailings have a potential to oxidize and leach
metals through acid rock drainage. Seepage control, for environmental not
dam safety, becomes a critical design parameter which can lead to much lower
tolerances for seepage losses from the impoundment, compared to water dams.
Unlike water dams, tailing dams are closed at the end of mine life (typically 20
years) but the tailings cannot be removed for decommissioning. Therefore
design must allow for safe decommissioning and low or zero maintenance in
perpetuity. This paper presents an assessment of the differences in design
details and approach between water dams and tailings dam and illustrates these
points with case histories from major international projects. The main design
issues of piping, drainage, structural fill, seepage control and closure are
discussed.
Introduction
Design, construction, operation, and closure of tailing dams have some
fundamental differences when compared to conventional water storage dams.
Some of these differences work to the benefit of the dam designer, and some
increase the complexity and difficulty. A guiding note, irrespective of the type of
dam, however, is that all dams are engineered structures and that the principles
of soil mechanics still apply. A tailings dam must safely contain mine tailings
and process water not only for operations, but for perpetuity.
Regulatory regime
Operating Life
Construction
Period
Closure
Engineering
Continuity of
engineering
QA/QC
Consequence of
failure
Dam Section
Water
The following sections discuss some of the differences between the design of
water dams and the design of tailing dams against a framework of the main
design considerations, namely piping, drainage, tailings as structural fill,
seepage control and closure.
1979). The tailings dam was constructed by the upstream method, with a decant
water pipe located in the dam. Twenty-five years after closure piping occurred
between an elevated water pond and the deteriorated decant pipe. The solution
to stop the piping was to distribute the surface tailings and push the pond away
from the dam crest. This eliminated subsequent piping development. The
authors are also aware of a number of reported cases where sinkholes have
been mitigated, or seepage controlled, by moving the pond away from the dam.
Seepage analysis programs are readily available to allow modeling of the
seepage gradients in response to percolation, spigot location or climatic
variations. However filter criteria for low head conditions are not as readily
available. Sherard does provide insight into how low head filter criteria can differ
from conventional criteria, which has been developed for high gradient
conditions. The seepage analysis of the dam, therefore, should include the
tailings mass, and the sensitivity of the pond location should be assessed to
optimize both the seepage control and piping control design for the dam.
The tailing dam designer should use caution in the placement of pervious rip rap
zones on the upstream face of an impervious dam, and with the use of upstream
rockfill shell zones. These zones have the disadvantage of introducing the full
hydraulic head on the upstream face or core of the dam and negating the
advantages of the tailings beach.
An additional piping concern has been emerging with water storage dams that
use glacial till core zones, with filters, to control seepage and piping. Long-term
internal erosion, such as has occurred at the Bennett Dam in northern British
Columbia raises concerns that the conventional filter criteria may not provide
long term security in design of seepage barriers and piping controls. The tailings
dam designer has the opportunity to consider the potential use of tailings to
minimize long-term reliance on impervious zones and filters. This can
significantly reduce the risk of the long term piping potential and internal erosion.
The Omai tailings dam failure also illustrates the case where a tailings beach
may have prevented a major dam failure. Failure of the dam occurred by piping
of the saprolite core zone into the rockfill shell zone, with subsequent piping of
tailings and failure of the dam. In this case the full hydraulic gradients were
acting across the core zone, and water was available for continued transport of
piped material.
operations. The authors have used this analysis to show that a geotextile/gravel
drain could be used for a centerline cyclone sand dam recently designed in Peru.
In concrete faced rockfill tailing dams there is a risk of piping of tailings through
damaged concrete (e.g. cracks). The standard designs for concrete faced
rockfil dams (CFRD) includes a relatively coarse bedding-transition zones
downstream of the concrete face, which, while acceptable for water leakage,
these coarse transition zones encourage piping of tailings. This has been
considered to be a low risk because of the potential size of the cracks and the
likelihood that the hydraulic gradient, through the tailings, will be low enough to
control piping. However, in cases where the water pond is near the concrete
facing, piping through damaged concrete could occur. In most cases it is
probably prudent to place a geotextile filter fabric between the concrete and the
bedding layer to provide additional assurance.
The potential for chemical degradation of drains needs to be considered for
tailings dams. For example, the INCO R-4 tailings area (Plewes & MacDonald,
1996) stores tailings with elevated sulphide levels and mineral precipitates from
oxidation have plugged the granular drain system. The design solution for this
case was to design inverted saturated drainage systems where oxidation would
be minimized. Chemical precipitates can also cause filters and drains to become
cemented and thereby prone to cracking with a consequent reduction in piping
protection and potential for loss of fines.
Many tailing dam designs include pipes, either as underdrains or near the dam
face, to reduce water pressure and allow capture of seepage water for treatment.
While these drains can be effective in lowering the phreatic surface, they also
introduce a potential piping pathway and increase the risk of piping failure. There
are a number of case histories of tailings piping within PVC pipes installed in the
dam.
Figure 1 Los Frailes Dam Failure, Spain: High specific gravity of tailings
contributed to loading on dam and foundation.
Canada
130
150
CS
Copper
Gibraltar
Canada
100
120
CS
Copper
Kemess South
Canada
145
165
CS/ECRD
Copper
Brenda
Canada
120
150
CS
Copper
Copper
Kennecott
USA
30
80
CS
Fort Knox
USA
NA
115
ECD
Thompson
USA
NA
Montana Tunnels
USA
NA
250
Modified
Centerline
USA
NA
100
ECD
North Block
USA
NA
137
Antamina
Peru
120
232
CFRD
Zinc-copper-lead
Southern Peru
Peru
70
110
DSS
Copper
Candelaria
Chile
NA
163
FRD
Disputada
Chile
NA
120
Los Leones
Chile
160
160
Chuquicamata
Chile
NA
NA
DSS
Copper
Foskor Selati
South Africa
45
140
CS
Phosphate/Coppe
r
Anglogold Ergo
South Africa
84
90
DSS/USS
Gold
Impala Platinum
USS
Copper
Copper
South Africa
40
120
USS
Platinum
El Teniente
Chile
NA
NA
Copper
Alumbrera
Argentina
NA
120
DSS
Modified
Centerline/Rockfill
Copper
Copper
Dexing
China
NA
210
CSS
Hongjiadu
China
NA
183
ECRD
Papua New
Guinea
130
130
ECRD/CS
Copper , Gold
Medet
Bulgaria
105
105
USS
Copper, Gold
Elatsite 1
Bulgaria
145
145
DSS
Copper, Gold
Elatsite 2
Bulgaria
117
160
DSS
Copper, Gold
Assarel
Bulgaria
125
211
USS
Copper, Gold
Ok Tedi Interim
Dam
CFRD
FRD
USS
EFD
Centerline Construction
Centerline construction relies on the deposited tailings to form the main
upstream support for the tailings dam. Additional local support to the dam raise
is provided with either spigotted tailings, cycloned tailings, or borrow material.
The downstream zone may be constructed of conventional borrow materials or
cycloned sand. This method can typically be applied to almost all tailing dams,
although it can be limited in cases where large volumes of water are required to
be impounded, resulting in a relatively high dam section above the tailings
beach. In these cases the stability of the upstream slope (into the impoundment)
becomes the critical design condition. Examples of major centerline dams
include Highland Valley Copper (140 m high), Canada and Kennecott Utah
Copper (140 m high), United States.
Hydraulic Fill
Cylconing of tailings to produce sand for dam construction is common,
particularly with large open pit copper mines. Recent advances in this technology
include the use of flotation circuits to remove sulphides, for acid drainage control,
such as at the Kemess gold-copper mine in northern British Columbia. The use
of cycloned sand in seismic areas requires careful control of compaction and/or
10
Dewatered Tailings
Dry tailings disposal, where the tailings is mechanically dewatered, have been
used on a few sites. In this case the tailings dam can be formed by compaction
of dewatered tailings. If saturation and liquefaction are not a concern, the
disposal could consist of simply stacking the tailings, without compaction.
However, compaction could still be required to reduce permeability to limit
seepage through the tailings mass. Dewatered tailings disposal is currently being
carried out at several mines where a main requirement at the site is the
environmental concerns.
Conclusions
While tailing dams and water dams share a considerable amount of similarity in
design and construction they are two very different structures. The design of
tailing dams needs to consider the role of tailings, both as a part of the structural
component of the dam, as well as the environmental aspects of storing a mined
waste product. Tailing dams have additional considerations regarding piping,
filters, drainage, geochemistry, and structural support.
11
References
DAVIES, M. P., DAWSON, B.,TASAROFF, D. and CHIN,B., 1998. Static
liquefaction Slump of Mine Tailings A Case History. Proceedings 51st
Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Edmonton.
KLOHN, E.J.,1979. Seepage Control for Tailings Dams, Proceedings of 1st
International Mine Drainage Symposium, Denver, Colorado.
MCLEOD, H.N. and PLEWES, H.D., 2003. Can Tailings Dams Be Socially
Acceptable?. International Congress of Large Dams (ICOLD), Symposium on
Major Challenges in Tailings Dams, Montreal.
PLEWES, H.D. and MACDONALD, T., 1996. Investigation of chemical clogging
of drains at Inco Central Area tailings dams. Tailings and Mine Waste 96
Proceedings: 59:72, Rotterdam :Balkema
NEWMAN P., WHITE,R., and CADDEN, A., 2003. Paste The Future of
Tailings Disposal?
12