Cell Phone Radiation Binder The More You Know

Cell Phone Radiation - Science Review on Cancer Risks and Children's Health
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19658858/Cell-Phone-Radiation-Science-Review-on-CancerRisks-and-Childrens-Health
EWGs comprehensive, 10-month science evaluation of the hazards of cell phone
radiation includes data from more than 200 peer-reviewed studies, government
advisories, and industry documents, to provide you with the latest information on cell
phone safety.
Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Restore Neuron Growth in the Brain

By Edward R. Winstead
Posted:
November 14, 2003
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/11_03/brain.shtml
Most children who have radiation therapy to eradicate a brain tumor come through the
treatment free of cancer but go on to develop learning and memory problems not
unlike those seen in Alzheimer's patients. The decline begins many months or years
after the treatment and is currently irreversible. Now scientists are starting to understand
why.
It's very sad because these children survive the cancer but later on develop cognitive
problems and often end up in special education or institutionalized, says Theo D. Palmer
of the Department of Neurosurgery at Stanford University.
In an effort to understand why radiation to the brain causes cognitive decline, Palmer
and two colleagues conducted experiments in rats and learned that inflammation caused
by radiation blocks the production of new neurons in the hippocampus, which usually
generates thousands of neurons every day. This region is critical for learning and creating
new memories.
We found that rats exposed to radiation stopped producing neurons, and part of the
reason they stopped was inflammation, says Palmer.
Swedish researchers working independently made the same discovery at virtually the
same time.
Both studies found that new neurons are very sensitive to inflammation, says Olle
Lindvall, of Lund University Hospital in Sweden , who expressed surprise at how
detrimental inflammation is to the production of new neurons.
There is some good news. Both teams found that anti-inflammatory drugs restored the
growth of new neurons in injured rats.
The Stanford team used indomethacin, an anti-inflammatory usually prescribed to relieve
the pain and swelling caused by arthritis, gout and other conditions. The drug might be
used to help restore neuron growth in the human brain.
Before that happens, however, researchers need to know how to block only harmful
inflammation. Some inflammation, which occurs when cells respond to an injury such as
radiation or a stroke, is important in destroying brain tumors.
Palmer is cautiously optimistic that further research may show that an anti-inflammatory
drug given at the right time during radiation therapy could benefit patients and improve
their quality of life after therapy. Diminishing or preventing the damage could be as
simple as taking a pill twice a day at specific times during the treatment, he says.
The research is published today online in the journal Science. Another member of the
Stanford study, Michelle L. Monje, recently presented the findings at the 2003 Society
for Neuroscience meeting in New Orleans.
There is a great deal of interest from both parents and the doctors who treat childhood
cancer patients to find a solution to this devastating problem, Monje says.
Indomethacin is a prescription drug closely related to ibuprofen, which, like
aspirin, is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Collaborators of the
Stanford team are testing a variety of NSAIDs to see which one might work best
in a clinical setting.
The Swedish study, which appeared online in Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences a few weeks ago, involved minocyline, an antibiotic that has anti-inflammatory
properties.
The studies together, says Lindvall, suggest a link between inflammation and the
suppression of new neurons that may contribute to cognitive decline in people with brain
diseases. The challenge now is to determine the degree to which the loss of new neurons
in the brain contributes to cognitive problems.
The researchers hope in the coming years to find ways to improve the brain's response to
injury. This will almost certainly require learning more about stem cellsthe cells that
generate new neuronsand how they behave in the presence of inflammation.
...
Ekdahl, C.T. et al. Inflammation is detrimental for neurogenesis in adult brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 1363213637 (November 11, 2003).
Monje, M.L. et al. Inflammatory Blockade Restores Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis. Published online in Science
(November 13, 2003).
Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation Youre Getting

http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/09/cellphone-radiation/
September 9, 2009
Researchers are divided on whether radiation from cellphones pose health risks or not.
Now, one nonprofit organization adds some hard data to the argument: the radiation
emission profiles of more than 1,200 cell phone models. The data wont resolve the
debate, but does give concrete information to consumers to help them make their buying
decisions.
American cellphone radiation standards dont make enough of an allowance for safety
and ignore the impact of electromagnetic radiation on children, says the Environmental
Working Group, which analyzed the radiation emissions from 1,268 cellphones. The
group also looked at a number of recent research studies and supporting documentation
from the handset makers to arrive at its conclusions.
We think that based on current standards theres increased risk of developing brain
tumors in long term users people who have used cellphones for more than 10 years
from radiation in cellphones, says Olga Naidenko, a senior scientist at EWG, who
worked on the report for about 10 months.
The group has created a database of feature phones and smartphones that lists the
maximum radiation each of the devices emits. (You can look up your phones radiation
level using the form embedded in this story, below.)
We want consumers to take steps they can take to minimize potential risks, says
Naidenko.
About 4 billion people worldwide use cellphones. Researchers have been debating for
years on whether the radiation from cellphone use leads to health hazards such as cancer
and other illnesses. Perhaps, in no greater proof of how hot the debate is, infomercial
peddlers such as Kevin Trudeau and television doctors such as Andrew Weil have
declared that cellphone use are one of the risk factors for brain cancer.
More scientific studies have tried to assess both short term and long term impact of
cellphone usage. Yet there has been no conclusive evidence so far. Thats because earlier
research studies didnt have a pool of users available who had been on their cellphones
long enough, says Naidenko.
A lot of the studies that came out in 2000 and 2001 only looked at short term exposure,
which is about four to five years and they didnt see any risks from radiation, she says.
But now that we see results from long term studies, we are seeing more evidence to the
contrary.
Still Naidenko says the EWGs data doesnt conclusively prove a link between cellphone
radiation and health risks.
Henry Lai, a professor of bioengineering at the University of Washington who has
researched the issue in the past, reviewed EWGs report and says the group is on the right
track.
Theres no solid conclusion right now on whether cellphone use leads to increased
health risk, he says. But all the data shows cause of concern, and thats very well
brought out in the report.
Cellphone radiation is transmitted by the antenna and the circuitry inside the handset by
sending out electromagnetic waves (radio frequency radiation) to transmit their signal.
The radiation emitted by the antenna is not directional, which means that it propagates in
all directions more or less equally. Factors such as the type of digital signal coding in the
network, the antenna design and its position relative to the head determine how much
radiation is absorbed by a user, says EWG.
Other household appliances, such as microwave ovens, emit radiation, but no other
device is in such close contact with the human body as a cellphone. You dont put your
head inside the microwave, says Lai. And unless you are standing very, very close to it,
the radiation from microwaves is very low.
The Federal Communications Commission sets the acceptable U.S. radiation standards
for cellphones. The effects of the radiation depend on the rate at which energy is
absorbed by a mass of tissue. This is called as the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and
measured in watts per kilogram (W/kg). Most handset makers use private certification
companies to test the SAR on their devices.
Based on a recommendation from industry group, IEEE, the FCC limits SAR levels for
partial-body exposure (including head) to up to 1.6 W/kg, and whole body exposure to up
to 0.08 W/kg. For hands, wrists, feet, and ankles, the limit is up to 4 W/kg, averaged over
10 grams of tissue.
In general, the lower the SAR the better the phone, from a potential health hazard point of
view. For instance, Apples iPhone 3G has a maximum SAR of 1.39 W/kg when held at
the ear. Compare that to the 1.19 W/kg SAR for the iPhone 3G S.
The best phone on EWGs list, the Samsung Impression, has a maximum radiation of just
0.35 W/kg.
But FCCs current standards are inadequate, says EWG. FCC standards allow 20 times
more radiation to reach the head than the rest of the body, says an EWG
representative, and they dont provide an adequate margin of safety for cell phone
radiation exposure.
The FCC limit for the head (SAR of 1.6 W/kg) is just two-and-a-half times lower than
the level that caused behavioral changes in animals (SAR of 4 W/kg), says the
representative. Thus, the brain receives a high exposure, even though the brain may well
be one of the most sensitive parts of human body and should have more protection.
Theres also just one one standard for general population exposure which is same for
adults and children. The FCC also does not have strict enforcement against violators,
alleges EWG.
The U.S. government is not paying enough attention to this health problem, agrees Lai.
But policy makers in Washington D.C. are starting to take notice. Experts will present
evidence at a conference in mid-September, arguing for and against the impact of
radiation from cellphones on health, and its implications for public policy. But no
cellphone companies or handset makers are expected to be present. Independent of the
conference, Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pennsylvania) is expected to chair a Sept. 14
congressional hearing on cellphones.
Still EWGs research is just the beginning, says Lai. It is a not a scientific paper and
there are mistakes with over-interpretation and bias in use of some of the literature to
support their conclusions, he says. But it does serve the purpose of raising awareness of
the problems stemming from cellphone use.
Patents Prove Cell-Phone Dangers?

02.22.02
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2002/02/50592
Joanne Suder is no friend of the cell-phone industry.
The Baltimore attorney refuses to use its beloved product -- the mobile phone -- and has
ranted against the industry and its products on CNN's Larry King Live as well as other
media outlets.
Suder is perhaps best known for filing a high-profile $800 million lawsuit against the
cell-phone industry, claiming its products gave her client, Chris Newman -- a neurologist
in Baltimore -- a brain tumor.
That case won't be heard by a judge until next week, but Suder's already considering 36
more lawsuits against the industry, which she contends sells products that are harmful to
consumers.
Even though the scientific research goes both ways, the industry continues to proclaim its
innocence.
"Years of scientific research reaffirm there are no health risks associated with wireless
phones," said Nokia spokesman Keith Nowak.
Most recently, Suder accused the wireless industry of "putting a spin" on a Federal Trade
Commission decision to sue two companies for falsely advertising technology that
purportedly shielded cell-phone users from radiation. While Suder agreed the FTC should
crack down on fraudulent claims, she said the cell-phone industry's reaction to the news
showed it had a lot to hide in terms of the health risks associated with its products.
"It appears that the wireless communications industry is putting a spin on the FTC's
action or inaction," Suder said. "This creates the appearance that these snake oil devices
don't work because you do not need protective devices. This is clearly untrue.... Cell
phone radiation is dangerous and causes cellular damage that can result in tumors
and death."
Her evidence -- which she will present in federal district court in Baltimore next week -that cell phones wreak such havoc? "Dozens and dozens" of patents filed by the industry
to create radiation-shielding technology.
Nokia filed one of these patents on July 28, 1998, according to the U.S. patent office. The
patent contains a description for the creation of a device that would protect the cells in a
user's head from radiation.
"It has been suggested that radio frequency irradiation may stimulate extra growth
among supportive cells in the nerve system, which in the worst case it has been
suggested could lead to a development of a malignant tumor," the Nokia patent
states. "Although the consequences described above have not been scientifically
verified, the uncertainty has some effects by reducing the speed of growth of the
market of radiophones."
Motorola, Ericsson and other handset manufacturers own similar patents, Suder said.
"Those patents aren't snake oil," she said. "They're from the defendants' mouths
themselves."
The cell-phone industry remains confident it will quash Suder's evidence in court.
Nowak dismissed the Nokia patent touted by Suder as a patent "on antenna efficiency,"
not a disease-fighting tool.
"The more efficiently the phone can work, the better" it is for the consumer, Nowak said.
While Nokia won't have its day in court next week -- it isn't one of the defendants of
Suder's lawsuit - it may face Suder's wrath in another lawsuit.
Next week, a judge will sift through scientific evidence provided by both Suder and the
cell-phone industry to determine whether Chris Newman, 41, got a brain tumor from
using a cellular phone. The defendants in that lawsuit are Motorola, Verizon
Communications, Bell Atlantic Corp., Bell Atlantic Mobile, SBC Communications, the
Telecommunication Industry Association, and Cellular Telecommunications and Internet
Association.
Limit Your Exposure To Cell Phone Radiation

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/?key=37647832&message=Successfully+updated+Supporter+information
Four billion people around the globe own cell phones. As the market for new devices has
grown, so have concerns about the safety of cell phone radiation.
Recent studies find significantly higher risks for brain and salivary gland tumors among
people using cell phones for 10 years or longer. The state of the science is provocative
and troubling, and much more research is essential.
We at Environmental Working Group are still using our cell phones, but we also believe
that until scientists know much more about cell phone radiation, its smart for consumers
to buy phones with the lowest emissions.
The U.S. government ought to require cell phone companies to label their products
radiation output so that consumers can do the numbers at the point of sale.
It doesnt, so EWG has created this user-friendly interactive online guide to cell phone
emissions, covering over 1,000 phones currently on the market.
10 Best Phones
Listing is based on phones currently available from major carriers.
You can also see all available phones ranked by radiation.
Samsung
Impression
1.
(SGH-a877)
[AT&T]
Motorola
2. RAZR V8
[CellularONE]
Samsung
3. SGH-t229 [TMobile]
Samsung
4. Rugby (SGHa837) [AT&T]
Samsung
Propel Pro
5.
(SGH-i627)
[AT&T]
Samsung
Gravity
6. (SGH-t459)
[CellularONE,
T-Mobile]
T-Mobile
7. Sidekick [TMobile]
8. LG Xenon
(GR500)
[AT&T]
Motorola
9. Karma QA1
[AT&T]
10.
Sanyo Katana
II [Kajeet]
CELL PHONES LISTED BELOW
| Environmental Working Group
The Power of Information
home
health/toxics
Subcategories
Children's Health
The Environment
Our Food
Our Water
Consumer Products
BodyBurden
Pet Health
farming
Subcategories
Farm Subsidies
Black Farmers
Conservation Programs
natural resources
Subcategories
Fishing Subsidies
Mining
Oil & Gas
Public Lands: Who Owns the West?
Water Subsidies
Chemical Industry
energy choices
http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (1 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM
Subcategories
chemical index
Biofuels
Nuclear Waste
Transportation
Arsenic
Asbestos
Bisphenol A (BPA)
Fluoride
Lead
Mercury
Nitrate
Perchlorate
Phthalates
PCBs
Flame retardants
(PBDEs)
PFCs/Teflon
>> See all chemicals
>> See all chemical
families
Health Effects
Birth defects and

developmental delays
Brain and nervous system
Cancer
Endocrine system
Immune system (allergies)
Mutations
Persistent and
bioaccumulative
Reproduction and fertility
Respiratory system
Skin
>> See all
Health Tips
Media Center
Subcategories
Expert interviewees available

Latest Environmental Health News
Enviroblog
Mulch
Reporter feed
about ewg
Routes of
Exposure
Food
Air
Water
Consumer products
Personal care
products
Found in people
>> See all
Subcategories
About EWG
Our accomplishments
Our funding
Our board
What they say about EWG
Action Center
Employment opportunities
eNewsletter Archive
EWG in California
Privacy policy
EWG Feeds
Our staff
Contact Information
ASK EWG
HEADQUARTERS
1436 U St. NW, Suite 100
Washington, DC 20009
(202) 667-6982
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
2201 Broadway, Suite 308 Oakland, CA
94612
(510) 444-0973
MIDWEST OFFICE
103 E. 6th Street, Suite 201 Ames, IA 50010
(515) 598-2358
SACRAMENTO OFFICE
1107 9th Street, Suite 340 Sacramento, CA
95814
(916) 333-0566
take action
find something
5 Years in a Row
Top rated, 2003-2007
donate today
At EWG, our team of

scientists, e ngineers, policy experts, lawyers
and
computer programmers pores over government data, legal documents, scientific studies and o ur own
laboratory tests to expose threats to your health and the environment, and to find solutions. Our research
brings to light unsettling facts that you have a right to know.
sign up
email address
zip code
Home
Get a
Safer Phone
Get a
Headset
8 Safety
Tips
Full
Report
News
FAQ
Take
Action
TEST
TEST NO!
cell phone radiation -> get a safer phone
Look Up Your
Cell Phone
See the Top 10
Best Phones
Learn How to
Reduce Exposure
Read the Research
Easy Ways to
Take Action
Are cell phones safe? Many research groups around the world are working to find out. Your cell phone
emits radiation to send voi ce and text messages from you to the other caller. Some (not all) studies of
frequent cell-phone users suggest this radiation may increase risks for can cer or children's behavior
problems. Use this guide to find your phone and safer, low-radiation choices. [more tips]
Best and Worst Phones

Listing is based on phones currently available from major carriers. You can also see all available phones
or all phones (current and legacy) ranked by radiation.
BEST PHONES (low radiation)
WORST PHONES (high

radiation)
Samsung Impression
(SGH-a877) [AT&T]
Motorola MOTO
VU204 [Verizon
Wireless]
Motorola RAZR V8
[CellularONE]
T-Mobile myTouch
3G [T-Mobile]
Samsung SGH-t229 [TMobile]
Kyocera Jax S1300

[Virgin Mobile]
Samsung Rugby (SGHa837) [AT&T]
Blackberry Curve
8330 [Sprint, U.S.
Cellular, Verizon
Wireless,
MetroPCS]
Samsung Propel Pro

(SGH-i627) [AT&T]
Motorola W385 [U.

S. Cellular, Verizon
Wireless]
Samsung Gravity (SGHt459) [CellularONE, TMobile]
T-Mobile Shadow
[T-Mobile]
T-Mobile Sidekick [TMobile]
Motorola C290
[Sprint, Kajeet]
LG Xenon (GR500)
[AT&T]
Motorola i335
[Sprint]
Motorola Karma QA1

[AT&T]
Motorola MOTO
VE240 [Cricket,
MetroPCS]
Sanyo Katana II [Kajeet]
Blackberry Bold
9000 [AT&T]
Best and Worst PDAs/Smartphones

Listing is based on all PDAs/Smartphones in the database. You can also see all PDAs/Smartphones
ranked by radiation.
BEST PHONES (low radiation)
WORST PHONES (high

radiation)
Nokia 9300i
Kyocera Jax S1300

[Virgin Mobile]
Nokia 7710
T-Mobile myTouch
3G [T-Mobile]
T-Mobile MDA
(WIZA200)
Blackberry Curve
8330 [Sprint, U.S.
Cellular, Verizon
Wireless, MetroPCS]
Samsung Impression
(SGH-a877) [AT&T]
Palm Treo 600
Nokia 9300
T-Mobile Shadow
[T-Mobile]
Samsung Propel Pro

(SGH-i627) [AT&T]
Blackberry Bold
9000 [AT&T]
Samsung Gravity (SGHt459) [CellularONE, TMobile]
Blackberry Curve
8300 Smartphone
Blackberry Storm 9500

Smartphone
Palm Treo 650
Blackberry Storm 9530

[Verizon Wireless]
Blackberry Curve
8300 [AT&T, TMobile]
Nokia E90
Sony Ericsson
P910a
Legal Disclaimer: EWGs cell phone database is dynamic, which means that the cell phone ranking numbers may change based on evolving science, new information on
SAR radiation exposures, market conditions, or other factors. Please be advised that EWG does not recommend that companies create marketing materials based on the
EWG rating system, given that the rankings may change as the database is updated. EWG m akes no representations or warranties about any of the products rated on this
site. EWG hereby disclaims all warranties with regard to the products on t he site, including express, statutory, implied warranties of merchantability, or fitness for a
particular purpose..
Health/Toxics
Children's Health
The Environment
Our Food
Our Water
Consumer Products
BodyBurden
Pet Health
Farming
Farm Subsidies
Black Farmers
Natural Resources
Fishing Subsidies
Mining
Oil & Gas
Water Subsidies
Chemical Industry
Energy Choices
Biofuels
Nuclear Waste
Transportation
Increase Text Size

Decrease Text Size
PRIVACY
EWG for:
SCIENTISTS
JOURNALISTS
POLICY MAKERS
HEADQUARTERS 1436 U Street. NW, Suite 100 | Washington, DC 20009 | (202) 667-6982 | Con tact
Us
CALIFORNIA OFFICE 2201 Broadway, Suite 308 | Oakland, CA 94612 | (510) 444-0973 | Contact Us
MIDWEST OFFICE 103 E. 6th Street, Suite 201 | Ames, IA 50010 | (515) 598-2358 | Contact Us
SACRAMENTO OFFICE 1107 9th Street, Suite 340 | Sacramento, CA 95814 | (916) 333-0566 |
Contact Us
Copyright 2007-2009, Environmental Working Group. All Rights Reserved.
home
health/toxics
Subcategories
Children's Health
The Environment
Our Food
Our Water
Consumer Products
BodyBurden
Pet Health
farming
Subcategories
Farm Subsidies
Black Farmers
natural resources
Subcategories
Fishing Subsidies
Mining
Oil & Gas
Water Subsidies
Chemical Industry
energy choices
http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?allavailable=1 (1 of 26)9/11/2009 2:14:59 PM
Subcategories
chemical index
Biofuels
Nuclear Waste
Transportation
Arsenic
Asbestos
Bisphenol A (BPA)
Fluoride
Lead
Mercury
Nitrate
Perchlorate
Phthalates
PCBs
Flame retardants
(PBDEs)
PFCs/Teflon
>> See all chemical
families
Health Effects
Birth defects and

Cancer
Endocrine system
Mutations
Persistent and
bioaccumulative
Respiratory system
Skin
>> See all
Health Tips
Media Center
Subcategories

Enviroblog
Mulch
Reporter feed
about ewg
Routes of
Exposure
Food
Air
Water
Consumer products
Personal care
products
Found in people
>> See all
Subcategories
About EWG
Our accomplishments
Our funding
Our board
Action Center
eNewsletter Archive
EWG in California
Privacy policy
EWG Feeds
Our staff
Contact Information
ASK EWG
HEADQUARTERS
(202) 667-6982
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
94612
(510) 444-0973
MIDWEST OFFICE
(515) 598-2358
SACRAMENTO OFFICE
95814
(916) 333-0566
take action
find something
5 Years in a Row
donate today
At EWG, our team of

and
sign up
email address
zip code
Home
Get a
Safer Phone
Get a
Headset
8 Safety
Tips
Full
Report
News
FAQ
Take
Action
TEST
TEST NO!
cell phone radiation -> get a safer phone -> all available phones
Look Up Your
Cell Phone
See the Top 10
Best Phones
Learn How to
Reduce Exposure
Read the Research
Easy Ways to
Take Action
All Available Phones

Listing is based on phones currently available from major carriers. You can also see all phones (current
and legacy) or all PDAs/Smartphones ranked by radiation.
Currently
Phone Model
on the
market?
Samsung
Impression
(SGH-a877)
Yes
Service
carrier(s)
AT&T
Radiation
0.15 - 0.35 W/
kg
Motorola
RAZR V8
Yes
CellularONE
0.36 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-t229
Yes
T-Mobile
0.38 W/kg
Samsung
Rugby (SGHa837)
Yes
AT&T
0.22 - 0.46 W/
kg
Samsung
Propel Pro
(SGH-i627)
Yes
AT&T
0.14 - 0.47 W/
kg
Samsung
Gravity (SGHt459)
Yes
CellularONE,
T-Mobile
0.49 W/kg
T-Mobile
Sidekick
Yes
T-Mobile
0.50 W/kg
LG Xenon
(GR500)
Yes
AT&T
0.52 W/kg
Motorola
Karma QA1
Yes
AT&T
0.55 W/kg
Sanyo Katana
II
Yes
Kajeet
0.22 - 0.55 W/
kg
Motorola
W260g
Yes
TracFone
0.57 W/kg
Blackberry
Storm 9530
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.57 W/kg
Motorola
Stature i9
Yes
Boost Mobile,
Sprint
0.61 W/kg
Samsung
Magnet (SGHA257)
Yes
AT&T
0.62 - 0.64 W/
kg
Motorola
Renegade
V950
Yes
Sprint
0.66 W/kg
LG CF360
Yes
AT&T
0.68 W/kg
Samsung
Saga (SCHi770)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.69 W/kg
Helio Ocean
Yes
Virgin Mobile
0.72 W/kg
Samsung
SCH-i760
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.73 W/kg
Sony Ericsson
W518a
Walkman
Yes
AT&T
0.73 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-t339
Yes
T-Mobile
0.73 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-a137
Yes
AT&T
GoPhone,
AT&T
0.20 - 0.76 W/
kg
LG Voyager
(VX10000)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.77 W/kg
LG LX400
Yes
Sprint
Samsung
MyShot
(SCH-r430)
Yes
Cricket,
MetroPCS
Samsung
Exclaim
(SPH-m550)
Yes
Sprint
0.29 - 0.78 W/
kg
Samsung
Access (SGHa827)
Yes
AT&T
0.24 - 0.78 W/
kg
Sanyo
KATANA LX
(SCP-3800)
Yes
Sprint
0.53 - 0.78 W/
kg
Motorola
W175
Yes
TracFone
0.79 W/kg
LG Rhythm
(UX585)
Yes
U.S. Cellular
0.80 W/kg
0.36 - 0.77 W/
kg
0.78 W/kg
Motorola
MOTO W755
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.80 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-t109
Yes
T-Mobile
0.80 W/kg
Sony Ericsson
W760a
Yes
AT&T
0.81 W/kg
Nokia 5610
Yes
T-Mobile
0.81 W/kg
Samsung
Eternity(SGHa867)
Yes
AT&T
Nokia 7510
Yes
T-Mobile
0.84 W/kg
LG 225
Yes
TracFone
0.85 W/kg
HTC Touch
Diamond
(DIAM400)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.85 W/kg
HTC Touch
Diamond
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.85 - 0.86 W/
kg
HTC Touch
Diamond
(DIAM500)
Yes
Sprint, Alltel
0.86 W/kg
ZTE C79
Yes
MetroPCS
0.87 W/kg
Sony Ericsson
W200a
Yes
CellularONE
0.87 W/kg
Nokia 6301
Yes
T-Mobile
0.71 - 0.87 W/
kg
Samsung
Gleam (SCHu700)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.87 W/kg
Samsung
Slash (SPHm310)
Yes
Virgin Mobile
0.87 W/kg
LG CU405
Yes
AT&T
GoPhone
0.88 W/kg
0.11 - 0.82 W/
kg
Motorola
Rapture VU30
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
Sanyo Katana
Yes
Kajeet
T-Mobile
Sidekick LX
Yes
T-Mobile
0.89 W/kg
Motorola
RAZR V3
Yes
AT&T
GoPhone,
AT&T, TMobile
0.89 W/kg
LG Tritan
(UX840)
Yes
U.S. Cellular
0.89 W/kg
HTC Touch
PRO
Yes
Sprint, U.S.
Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless
0.91 W/kg
Sanyo
KATANA
Eclipse X
Yes
Sprint
Palm Pre
Yes
Sprint, Verizon
Wireless
0.92 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-t439
Yes
CellularONE,
T-Mobile
0.92 W/kg
Nokia 6650
Yes
AT&T
0.92 W/kg
Samsung
Mantra
Yes
Virgin Mobile
0.93 W/kg
LG VX5500
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.95 W/kg
LG 600G
Yes
TracFone
0.96 W/kg
Samsung
Renown
(SCH-u810)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.96 W/kg
Sony Ericsson
Z310a
Yes
AT&T, AT&T
GoPhone
0.96 W/kg
0.88 W/kg
0.68 - 0.88 W/
kg
0.60 - 0.91 W/
kg
Nokia 6205
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
LG LX150
Yes
Kajeet
0.76 - 0.96 W/
kg
Samsung
Propel (SGHa767)
Yes
AT&T
0.26 - 0.97 W/
kg
Samsung
Behold (SGHt919)
Yes
T-Mobile
0.99 W/kg
ZTE C78
Yes
MetroPCS
0.99 W/kg
LG Neon
Yes
AT&T,
CellularONE
1.00 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-T101G
Yes
TracFone
1.00 W/kg
Nokia 6085
Yes
AT&T, AT&T
GoPhone
1.00 W/kg
Nokia 2600
Yes
AT&T, AT&T
GoPhone
1.00 W/kg
Samsung
MyShot II
Yes
Cricket
1.00 W/kg
Nokia 3220
Yes
CellularONE,
T-Mobile
0.71 - 1.01 W/
kg
Nokia 3600
Slide
Yes
CellularONE
1.01 W/kg
Samsung Rant
(SPH-m540)
Yes
Sprint
Blackberry
Curve 8900
Yes
AT&T, TMobile
1.01 W/kg
Helio Ocean2
Yes
Virgin Mobile
1.02 W/kg
Motorola
MOTOROKR
E8
Yes
CellularONE,
T-Mobile
1.02 W/kg
0.96 W/kg
0.70 - 1.01 W/
kg
Motorola i580
Yes
Sprint
1.02 W/kg
Samsung
JACK (i637)
Yes
AT&T
0.42 - 1.04 W/
kg
Samsung
Delve (SCHr800)
Yes
U.S. Cellular,
Alltel
0.80 - 1.04 W/
kg
Samsung
Byline (SCHr310)
Yes
MetroPCS
0.63 - 1.05 W/
kg
Samsung
SGH-T349
Yes
T-Mobile
1.05 W/kg
Samsung
JetSet (SCHr550)
Yes
Cricket
1.05 W/kg
Samsung
SCH-R311
Yes
U.S. Cellular
1.06 W/kg
Nokia 1680
Yes
T-Mobile
1.06 W/kg
Samsung
SCH-u430
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.07 W/kg
Motorola Hint
QA30
Yes
Cricket, U.S.
Cellular,
MetroPCS
1.08 W/kg
Samsung
Glyde (SCHu940)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.08 W/kg
Motorola
W490
Yes
CellularONE,
T-Mobile
1.08 W/kg
Blackberry
Curve 8320
Yes
AT&T
1.08 W/kg
Samsung
SPH-m220
Yes
Sprint
0.75 - 1.08 W/
kg
Nokia 7205
Intrigue
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.08 W/kg
Samsung
Smooth (SCHu350)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.09 W/kg
Blackberry
Curve 8310
Yes
AT&T
1.09 W/kg
LG Dare
(VX9700)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.09 W/kg
Motorola i365
Yes
Sprint
1.09 W/kg
Samsung
SPH-m300
Yes
Kajeet, Sprint
0.79 - 1.09 W/
kg
UTStarcom
GTX75 (aka
AT&T
Quickfire)
Yes
AT&T
0.36 - 1.10 W/
kg
Blackberry
Curve 8350i
Yes
Sprint
1.10 W/kg
Nokia 2610
Yes
AT&T
GoPhone,
CellularONE,
T-Mobile,
AT&T
1.10 W/kg
Nokia 2760
Yes
CellularONE,
T-Mobile
0.74 - 1.10 W/
kg
Samsung
SPH-M320
Yes
Sprint
0.81 - 1.11 W/
kg
T-Mobile G1
with Google
Yes
T-Mobile
1.11 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-a437
Yes
AT&T
GoPhone,
AT&T
0.72 - 1.11 W/
kg
Samsung Step
(SCH-r470
Two)
Yes
U.S. Cellular
1.00 - 1.11 W/
kg
Nokia 2605
Mirage
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.12 W/kg
Motorola
Evoke QA4
Yes
Cricket
1.13 W/kg
LG 3280
Yes
TracFone
1.13 W/kg
HTC Fuze
(RAPH110)
Yes
AT&T
1.13 W/kg
HTC Fuze
Yes
AT&T
1.13 W/kg
UTStarcom
CDM7126
Yes
Cricket,
MetroPCS
1.13 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-a237
Yes
LG VX8360
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.14 W/kg
Samsung
Knack (SCHu310)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.14 W/kg
Blackberry
Pearl Flip
8220
Yes
T-Mobile
1.15 W/kg
LG Lotus
(LX600)
Yes
Sprint
Motorola
Krave ZN4
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
Samsung Tint
(SCH-R420
Yes
MetroPCS
Motorola
Clutch i465
Yes
Boost Mobile,
Sprint
1.17 W/kg
LG CP150
Yes
AT&T
GoPhone
1.18 W/kg
LG 410G
Yes
TracFone
1.18 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-t819
Yes
T-Mobile
1.19 W/kg
AT&T, AT&T 1.07 - 1.14 W/

GoPhone
kg
0.90 - 1.15 W/
kg
1.16 W/kg
0.68 - 1.17 W/
kg
LG LX160
Yes
Kajeet, Sprint
Apple iPhone
3G S
Yes
AT&T
0.52 - 1.19 W/
kg
Samsung
BlackJack II
(SGH-i617)
Yes
AT&T
0.61 - 1.20 W/
kg
Samsung
SCH-U440
Yes
U.S. Cellular
1.13 - 1.21 W/
kg
Sanyo PRO200
Yes
Sprint
0.41 - 1.21 W/
kg
LG CE110
Yes
AT&T, AT&T
GoPhone
1.22 W/kg
Samsung
Finesse (SCHr810)
Yes
MetroPCS
1.22 W/kg
Samsung
Solstice
(SGH-A877)
Yes
AT&T
0.67 - 1.23 W/
kg
Sony Ericsson
C905a Cybershot
Yes
AT&T,
CellularONE
0.67 - 1.23 W/
kg
Motorola
MOTORAKR
Z6m
Yes
MetroPCS
1.23 W/kg
Motorola
MOTOACTV
W450
Yes
T-Mobile
1.23 W/kg
Motorola The
Buzz ic502
Yes
Sprint
1.24 W/kg
Blackberry
Pearl 8110
Yes
AT&T
1.24 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-t219
Yes
T-Mobile
1.24 W/kg
1.19 W/kg
Sanyo PRO700
Yes
Sprint
Nokia 5310
Xpress Music
Yes
CellularONE
Nokia 5310
Yes
T-Mobile
1.11 - 1.25 W/
kg
Sanyo SCP2700
Yes
Sprint
1.16 - 1.25 W/
kg
LG Chocolate
3 (VX8560)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.26 W/kg
Motorola
RAZR V3i
Yes
CellularONE,
AT&T, TMobile
1.26 W/kg
LG VU
(CU915)
Yes
AT&T
1.26 W/kg
Samsung
SCH-r211
Yes
Cricket
1.26 W/kg
Nokia 3606
Yes
Cricket
1.27 W/kg
Helio Fin
Yes
Virgin Mobile
Blackberry
8820
Yes
AT&T, TMobile,
Verizon
Wireless
1.28 W/kg
LG enV
Touch
(VX11000,
Voyager 2)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.28 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-a637
Yes
AT&T
0.45 - 1.28 W/
kg
Samsung
SGH-a737
Yes
AT&T
0.43 - 1.28 W/
kg
0.54 - 1.24 W/
kg
1.25 W/kg
0.53 - 1.27 W/
kg
Samsung
Sway (SCHu650)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.28 W/kg
Nokia 5800
XpressMusic
Yes
CellularONE
1.29 W/kg
Motorola
Moto Q
Global
Yes
AT&T
1.29 W/kg
Motorola i880
Yes
Sprint
1.30 W/kg
LG 200C
Yes
TracFone
1.30 W/kg
Motorola
MOTO Q 9m
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.30 W/kg
Cricket
TXTM8
Yes
Cricket
1.30 W/kg
Verizon
Wireless
CDM8975
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.30 W/kg
Verizon
Wireless
CDM8975PTT
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.30 W/kg
LG INCITE
(CT810)
Yes
AT&T
1.30 W/kg
Samsung Epix
(SGH-i907)
Yes
AT&T
0.52 - 1.30 W/
kg
LG LX290
Yes
Sprint
1.04 - 1.30 W/
kg
Samsung
Omnia (SCHi910)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.31 W/kg
LG enV 3
(VX9200)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.31 W/kg
Samsung
SCH-u410
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.31 W/kg
Samsung Juke
(SCH-u470)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.31 W/kg
Nokia Surge
6790
Yes
AT&T
1.31 W/kg
Motorola
Tundra VA76r
Yes
AT&T
1.32 W/kg
Motorola
W376g
Yes
TracFone
1.32 W/kg
Motorola
V176
Yes
TracFone
1.33 W/kg
Samsung
Instinct s30
Yes
Sprint
1.05 - 1.33 W/
kg
Nokia 6555
Yes
AT&T
0.93 - 1.33 W/
kg
LG enV 2
(VX9100)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.34 W/kg
LG Invision
(CB630)
Yes
AT&T
1.34 W/kg
Samsung
Trance (SCHu490)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.34 W/kg
Motorola
MOTORAZR
VE20
Yes
Sprint, U.S.
Cellular
1.34 W/kg
Verizon
Wireless
G'zOne Type
S
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.34 W/kg
Samsung
SCH-u540
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.34 W/kg
Verizon
Wireless
G'zOne Type
S PTT
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.34 W/kg
AT&T,
CellularONE, 1.09 - 1.35 W/
kg
Sprint, Verizon
Wireless
Palm Centro
Yes
Motorola
MotoEM330
Yes
AT&T
1.35 W/kg
LG LX370
Yes
Sprint
0.90 - 1.36 W/
kg
Samsung
ACE (SPHi325)
Yes
Sprint
1.00 - 1.36 W/
kg
Samsung
SPH-z400
Yes
Sprint
0.72 - 1.36 W/
kg
Motorola
MOTOROKR
U9
Yes
CellularONE
1.36 W/kg
LG Versa
(VX9600)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.38 W/kg
Verizon
Wireless
CDM8950
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.38 W/kg
Nokia 1606
Yes
Cricket,
MetroPCS
1.38 W/kg
Samsung
SCH-u340
Yes
Cricket, U.S.
Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless
1.38 W/kg
Motorola
C261
Yes
TracFone
1.38 W/kg
Apple iPhone
3G
Yes
AT&T
0.24 - 1.39 W/
kg
Helio Mysto
Yes
Virgin Mobile
1.21 - 1.39 W/
kg
Samsung
SCH-u550
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.39 W/kg
Motorola
RAZR V3s
Yes
MetroPCS
1.40 W/kg
Samsung
FlipShot
(SCH-u900)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.40 W/kg
Nokia E71
Yes
CellularONE
Palm Treo
PRO
(T850EWW)
Yes
Sprint
1.40 W/kg
Motorola
W370
Yes
TracFone
1.40 W/kg
Nokia E71x
Yes
AT&T
1.41 W/kg
Samsung
Messager,
Mister
Cartoon
(SCH-r450)
Yes
Cricket,
MetroPCS
1.42 W/kg
Sony Ericsson
Z750a
Yes
AT&T
1.42 W/kg
Motorola
C139
Yes
TracFone
1.43 W/kg
Blackberry
8703e
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.44 W/kg
Motorola
Adventure
V750
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.45 W/kg
Motorola
Boost i776
Yes
Boost Mobile
1.45 W/kg
Samsung
Highnote
(SPH-m630)
Yes
Sprint
1.23 - 1.40 W/
kg
0.74 - 1.45 W/
kg
Motorola i576
Yes
Sprint
1.45 W/kg
Motorola i776
Yes
Sprint
1.45 W/kg
Blackberry
8830 World
Edition
Yes
U.S. Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless, Sprint
1.46 W/kg
Sony Ericsson
TM506
Yes
T-Mobile
1.46 W/kg
Samsung
SGH-a777
Yes
AT&T
0.63 - 1.46 W/
kg
Samsung
Instinct (SPHm800)
Yes
Sprint
1.16 - 1.46 W/
kg
Firefly
GlowPhone
Yes
CellularONE
1.46 W/kg
Blackberry
8700g
Yes
T-Mobile
1.46 W/kg
Samsung
Spex (SCHr210)
Yes
Cricket, U.S.
Cellular
1.46 W/kg
Kyocera Neo
E1100
Yes
U.S. Cellular,
MetroPCS
1.46 W/kg
Helio Heat
Yes
Virgin Mobile
0.85 - 1.46 W/
kg
Blackberry
Pearl 8120
Yes
T-Mobile,
AT&T
Sanyo S1
Yes
Sprint
Blackberry
Pearl 8130
Yes
Sprint, U.S.
Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless
1.48 W/kg
Motorola
MOTOSLVR
L9
Yes
CellularONE
1.48 W/kg
1.48 W/kg
1.46 - 1.48 W/
kg
HTC SMT
5800
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
Kyocera Melo
S1300
Yes
MetroPCS
1.11 - 1.50 W/
kg
Nokia 1006
Yes
MetroPCS
1.50 W/kg
Kyocera
S1300
Yes
Cricket
1.11 - 1.50 W/
kg
Blackberry
Bold 9000
Yes
AT&T
1.51 W/kg
LG Rumor2
(LX265)
Yes
Sprint
1.04 - 1.51 W/
kg
Motorola
V365
Yes
AT&T
1.51 W/kg
Blackberry
Curve 8300
Yes
T-Mobile,
AT&T
1.51 W/kg
Motorola
MOTO VE240
Yes
Cricket,
MetroPCS
1.52 W/kg
T-Mobile
Shadow
Yes
T-Mobile
1.53 W/kg
Motorola i335
Yes
Sprint
1.53 W/kg
Motorola
C290
Yes
Kajeet, Sprint
1.53 W/kg
Yes
U.S. Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless
1.54 W/kg
Blackberry
Curve 8330
Yes
Sprint, U.S.
Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless,
MetroPCS
1.54 W/kg
T-Mobile
myTouch 3G
Yes
T-Mobile
1.55 W/kg
Motorola
W385
1.49 W/kg
Motorola
MOTO
VU204
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.55 W/kg
Kyocera Jax
S1300
Yes
Virgin Mobile
1.55 W/kg
Pantech C610
Yes
AT&T
N/A
Kyocera X-tc
M2000
Yes
Virgin Mobile
N/A
Sony z555a
Yes
CellularONE
N/A
LG Rumor
Yes
Kajeet
N/A
Pantech
Breeze
Yes
AT&T
N/A
Motorola
Renew W233
Yes
T-Mobile
N/A
Pantech Slate
(C530)
Yes
AT&T, AT&T
GoPhone
N/A
Sony Ericsson
F305
Yes
CellularONE
N/A
HTC Touch
(ELF0100)
Yes
CellularONE,
U.S. Cellular
N/A
Motorola
Boost i290
Yes
Boost Mobile
N/A
HTC Snap
Yes
Sprint
N/A
Motorola i920
Yes
Sprint
N/A
Motorola
V170
Yes
TracFone
N/A
LG Flare
(LX165)
Yes
Virgin Mobile
N/A
Sony Ericsson
W350
Yes
AT&T, AT&T
GoPhone
N/A
Blackberry
Curve 8830
Yes
Sprint
N/A
Motorola
Boost i335
Yes
Boost Mobile
N/A
Motorola
KRZR
Yes
CellularONE
N/A
Motorola
V195s
Yes
T-Mobile
N/A
Samsung t636
Yes
CellularONE
N/A
Cricket A100
Yes
Cricket
N/A
Kyocera
Mako S4000
Yes
MetroPCS
N/A
Kyocera
TNT! S2400
Yes
Virgin Mobile
N/A
Motorola
W315
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
Cricket EZ
Yes
Cricket
N/A
HTC Touch
Yes
CellularONE
N/A
Motorola
Boost i776w
Yes
Boost Mobile
N/A
Blackberry
Tour 9630
Smartphone
Yes
Sprint
N/A
Kyocera K132
Yes
Cricket
N/A
Kyocera
Marbl K127
Yes
Virgin Mobile
N/A
LG Wine
(UX280)
Yes
U.S. Cellular
N/A
Pantech C630
Yes
AT&T
N/A
Motorola
Multimedia
RAZR
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
Motorola Q9
Yes
CellularONE
N/A
Kyocera
K126C
Yes
TracFone
N/A
LG Shine
(CU720)
Yes
AT&T
N/A
Blackberry
Pearl Flip
8230
Yes
U.S. Cellular
N/A
HTC Touch
Diamond
XV6950
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
Pantech
Matrix Pro
Yes
AT&T
N/A
Pantech
Matrix
Yes
AT&T
N/A
Motorola
RAZR
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
Sierra
Wireless 598U
Yes
Sprint
N/A
Verizon
Wireless
G'zOne
Boulder
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
Verizon
Wireless Blitz
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
Verizon
Wireless
XV6900
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
UTStarcom
Shuttle
Yes
Virgin Mobile
N/A
UTStarcom
Arc
Yes
Virgin Mobile
N/A
Palm Treo
755p
Yes
Sprint
N/A
N/A: This information was not available online from the manufacturer.
Health/Toxics
Children's Health
The Environment
Our Food
Our Water
Consumer Products
BodyBurden
Pet Health
Farming
Farm Subsidies
Black Farmers
Natural Resources
Fishing Subsidies
Mining
Oil & Gas
Water Subsidies
Chemical Industry
Energy Choices
Biofuels
Nuclear Waste
Transportation
Increase Text Size

Decrease Text Size
PRIVACY
EWG for:
SCIENTISTS
JOURNALISTS
POLICY MAKERS
Us
Contact Us
home
health/toxics
Subcategories
Children's Health
The Environment
Our Food
Our Water
Consumer Products
BodyBurden
Pet Health
farming
Subcategories
Farm Subsidies
Black Farmers
natural resources
Subcategories
Fishing Subsidies
Mining
Oil & Gas
Water Subsidies
Chemical Industry
energy choices
http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?phone_function=PDA (1 of 17)9/11/2009 2:18:48 PM
Subcategories
chemical index
Biofuels
Nuclear Waste
Transportation
Arsenic
Asbestos
Bisphenol A (BPA)
Fluoride
Lead
Mercury
Nitrate
Perchlorate
Phthalates
PCBs
Flame retardants
(PBDEs)
PFCs/Teflon
>> See all chemical
families
Health Effects
Birth defects and

Cancer
Endocrine system
Mutations
Persistent and
bioaccumulative
Respiratory system
Skin
>> See all
Health Tips
Media Center
Subcategories

Enviroblog
Mulch
Reporter feed
about ewg
Routes of
Exposure
Food
Air
Water
Consumer products
Personal care
products
Found in people
>> See all
Subcategories
About EWG
Our accomplishments
Our funding
Our board
Action Center
eNewsletter Archive
EWG in California
Privacy policy
EWG Feeds
Our staff
Contact Information
ASK EWG
HEADQUARTERS
(202) 667-6982
CALIFORNIA OFFICE
94612
(510) 444-0973
MIDWEST OFFICE
(515) 598-2358
SACRAMENTO OFFICE
95814
(916) 333-0566
take action
find something
5 Years in a Row
donate today
At EWG, our team of

and
sign up
email address
zip code
Home
Get a
Safer Phone
Get a
Headset
8 Safety
Tips
Full
Report
News
FAQ
Take
Action
TEST
TEST NO!
cell phone radiation -> get a safer phone
Look Up Your
Cell Phone
See the Top 10
Best Phones
Learn How to
Reduce Exposure
Read the Research
Easy Ways to
Take Action
All PDA/Smartphones
Listing is based on PDA/Smartphones (current and legacy). You can also see all available phones or all
phones (current and legacy) ranked by radiation.
Phone
Model
Currently
on the
market?
Nokia 9300i
No
0.21 W/kg
Nokia 7710
No
0.22 W/kg
Service
carrier(s)
Radiation
T-Mobile
MDA
(WIZA200)
No
Samsung
Impression
(SGH-a877)
Yes
Nokia 9300
No
Samsung
Propel Pro
(SGH-i627)
Yes
AT&T
Samsung
Gravity
(SGH-t459)
Yes
CellularONE, TMobile
Blackberry
Storm 9500
Smartphone
No
Blackberry
Storm 9530
Yes
Nokia E90
No
Samsung
Magnet
(SGH-A257)
Yes
Nokia N96
No
Samsung
Saga (SCHi770)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.69 W/kg
T-Mobile
Wing
(HERA110)
No
T-Mobile
0.72 W/kg
Helio Ocean
Yes
Virgin Mobile
0.72 W/kg
LG Voyager
(VX10000)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.77 W/kg
0.28 W/kg
AT&T
0.15 - 0.35 W/
kg
0.21 - 0.44 W/
kg
0.14 - 0.47 W/
kg
0.49 W/kg
0.57 W/kg
Verizon
Wireless
0.57 W/kg
0.59 W/kg
AT&T
0.62 - 0.64 W/
kg
0.58 - 0.68 W/
kg
Samsung
Exclaim
(SPH-m550)
Yes
Sprint
0.29 - 0.78 W/
kg
Samsung
Eternity
(SGH-a867)
Yes
AT&T
0.11 - 0.82 W/
kg
Nokia 6682
No
HTC Touch
Diamond
(DIAM400)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.85 W/kg
HTC Touch
Diamond
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
0.85 - 0.86 W/
kg
HTC Touch
Diamond
(DIAM500)
Yes
Sprint, Alltel
T-Mobile
SDA
(ST26A)
No
T-Mobile
Sidekick LX
Yes
T-Mobile
0.89 W/kg
HTC Touch
PRO
Yes
Sprint, U.S.
Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless
0.91 W/kg
Palm Pre
Yes
Sprint, Verizon
Wireless
0.92 W/kg
Samsung
BlackJack
(SGH-i607)
No
AT&T
Nokia E62
No
Samsung
Propel
(SGH-a767)
Yes
0.82 W/kg
0.86 W/kg
0.89 W/kg
0.32 - 0.95 W/
kg
0.95 W/kg
AT&T
0.26 - 0.97 W/
kg
Apple
iPhone
No
Sony
Ericsson P1i
No
Samsung
Behold
(SGH-t919)
Yes
T-Mobile
0.99 W/kg
Blackberry
Curve 8900
Yes
AT&T, TMobile
1.01 W/kg
Sony
Ericsson
P900
No
Helio
Ocean2
Yes
Virgin Mobile
Samsung
JACK (i637)
Yes
AT&T
Samsung
Glyde (SCHu940)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.08 W/kg
Blackberry
Curve 8320
Yes
AT&T
1.08 W/kg
Blackberry
Curve 8310
Yes
AT&T
1.09 W/kg
Samsung
SCH-i600
No
Verizon
Wireless
1.09 W/kg
Blackberry
7130c
No
UTStarcom
GTX75 (aka
AT&T
Quickfire)
Yes
AT&T
0.36 - 1.10 W/
kg
Blackberry
Curve 8350i
Yes
Sprint
1.10 W/kg
AT&T
0.97 W/kg
0.98 W/kg
1.01 W/kg
1.02 W/kg
0.42 - 1.04 W/
kg
1.09 W/kg
T-Mobile
G1 with
Google
Yes
Nokia E61i
No
HTC Fuze
Yes
AT&T
1.13 W/kg
HTC Mogul
(TITA100)
No
Sprint, Quest
1.13 W/kg
HTC Fuze
(RAPH110)
Yes
AT&T
1.13 W/kg
Nokia E61
No
Blackberry
Pearl Flip
8220
Yes
Palm Treo
750
No
0.24 - 1.16 W/
kg
Blackberry
8800
Smartphone
No
1.16 W/kg
Apple
iPhone 3G S
Yes
AT&T
0.52 - 1.19 W/
kg
Samsung
BlackJack II
(SGH-i617)
Yes
AT&T
0.61 - 1.20 W/
kg
Blackberry
Pearl 8100
Smartphone
No
1.22 W/kg
Blackberry
7130e
No
1.23 W/kg
Samsung
Solstice
(SGH-A877)
Yes
Nokia N78
No
T-Mobile
1.11 W/kg
0.83 - 1.12 W/
kg
1.14 W/kg
T-Mobile
AT&T
1.15 W/kg
0.67 - 1.23 W/
kg
1.23 W/kg
Blackberry
Pearl 8110
Yes
HTC Touch
Cruise
(IOLI110)
No
Sanyo SCP2700
Yes
Palm Treo
700wx
No
1.26 W/kg
Palm Treo
700w
No
1.26 W/kg
AT&T
1.24 W/kg
1.25 W/kg
Sprint
1.16 - 1.25 W/
kg
Blackberry
8820
Yes
AT&T, TMobile,
Verizon
Wireless
Nokia 5800
XpressMusic
Yes
CellularONE
1.29 W/kg
Motorola
Moto Q
Global
Yes
AT&T
1.29 W/kg
Motorola
MOTO Q 9h
No
Motorola
MOTO Q
9m
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.30 W/kg
LG INCITE
(CT810)
Yes
AT&T
1.30 W/kg
Blackberry
8707g
Smartphone
No
Samsung
Epix (SGHi907)
Yes
1.28 W/kg
1.29 W/kg
1.30 W/kg
AT&T
0.52 - 1.30 W/
kg
Samsung
SCH-i730
No
Verizon
Wireless
1.31 W/kg
Nokia Surge
6790
Yes
AT&T
1.31 W/kg
Samsung
Omnia
(SCH-i910)
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
1.31 W/kg
Blackberry
8700r
Smartphone
No
1.34 W/kg
Blackberry
8700c
Smartphone
No
1.34 W/kg
Palm Centro
Yes
AT&T,
CellularONE, 1.09 - 1.35 W/
kg
Sprint, Verizon
Wireless
Samsung
ACE (SPHi325)
Yes
Sprint
Samsung
SPH-i700
No
Sprint, Verizon
Wireless
Apple
iPhone 3G
Yes
AT&T
0.24 - 1.39 W/
kg
Nokia E71
Yes
CellularONE
1.23 - 1.40 W/
kg
Palm Treo
PRO
(T850EWW)
Yes
Sprint
1.40 W/kg
Samsung
SPH-i330
No
Sprint
1.37 - 1.40 W/
kg
Nokia E71x
Yes
AT&T
1.41 W/kg
Palm Treo
800W
No
Sprint
0.07 - 1.43 W/
kg
1.00 - 1.36 W/
kg
1.36 W/kg
Blackberry
8703e
Yes
Blackberry
8707v
Smartphone
No
Verizon
Wireless
1.44 W/kg
1.45 W/kg
Blackberry
8830 World
Edition
U.S. Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless, Sprint
Yes
Blackberry
8700v
Smartphone
No
1.46 W/kg
Blackberry
8700f
Smartphone
No
1.46 W/kg
Samsung
Instinct
(SPH-m800)
Yes
Sprint
Kyocera
Neo E1100
Yes
U.S. Cellular,
MetroPCS
1.46 W/kg
Blackberry
8700g
Yes
T-Mobile
1.46 W/kg
Blackberry
Pearl 8130
Yes
Sprint, U.S.
Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless
1.48 W/kg
Blackberry
Pearl 8120
Yes
T-Mobile,
AT&T
1.48 W/kg
HTC
HTC5800
(LIBR100)
No
HTC SMT
5800
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
Kyocera
Melo S1300
Yes
MetroPCS
1.46 W/kg
1.16 - 1.46 W/
kg
1.49 W/kg
1.49 W/kg
1.11 - 1.50 W/
kg
Sony
Ericsson
P910a
No
Blackberry
Bold 9000
Yes
Blackberry
Curve 8300
Smartphone
No
Blackberry
Curve 8300
Yes
Palm Treo
650
No
T-Mobile
Shadow
Yes
Palm Treo
600
No
1.50 W/kg
AT&T
1.51 W/kg
1.51 W/kg
T-Mobile,
AT&T
1.51 W/kg
0.54 - 1.51 W/
kg
T-Mobile
1.53 W/kg
1.05 - 1.53 W/
kg
Blackberry
Curve 8330
Yes
Sprint, U.S.
Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless,
MetroPCS
Kyocera Jax
S1300
Yes
Virgin Mobile
1.55 W/kg
T-Mobile
myTouch 3G
Yes
T-Mobile
1.55 W/kg
Blackberry
7250
No
Sprint, Verizon
Wireless
N/A
HTC Touch
(VOGU100)
No
Sprint, Alltel
N/A
Blackberry
7290
No
N/A
HTC Shift
(CLIO110)
No
N/A
1.54 W/kg
Sony
Ericsson
M600i
No
T-Mobile
Dash
(EXCA 100)
No
T-Mobile
N/A
HTC
PPC6800
(TITA100)
No
Sprint, U.S.
Cellular,
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
Blackberry
7130
No
HTC Touch
Yes
CellularONE
N/A
HTC Snap
Yes
Sprint
N/A
HTC S743
(ROSE130)
No
N/A
T-Mobile
Shadow
(CONV100)
No
N/A
Blackberry
Tour 9630
Smartphone
Yes
Sprint
N/A
HTC Touch
Diamond
XV6950
Yes
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
HTC
Advantage
X7501
(ATHE100)
No
Samsung
SPH-i300
No
Sprint
N/A
HTC Touch
(ELF0100)
Yes
CellularONE,
U.S. Cellular
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Motorola
MOTO Q 9c
No
Pantech Duo
No
N/A
Palm Treo
680
No
N/A
Blackberry
8707h
Smartphone
No
N/A
Blackberry
Curve 8830
Yes
Sprint
N/A
Blackberry
Pearl Flip
8230
Yes
U.S. Cellular
N/A
Kyocera Xtc M2000
Yes
Virgin Mobile
N/A
Blackberry
7100i
No
Motorola Q9
Yes
HTC TyTN
II
(KAIS130)
No
Pantech
Matrix Pro
Yes
AT&T
N/A
Pantech
Slate (C530)
Yes
AT&T, AT&T
GoPhone
N/A
Blackberry
8707
Smartphone
No
N/A
Blackberry
7520
No
N/A
Verizon
Wireless
XV6900
Yes
Sprint
N/A
N/A
CellularONE
N/A
N/A
Verizon
Wireless
N/A
Palm Treo
755p
Yes
Palm Treo
700p
No
Sprint
N/A
N/A
N/A: This information was not available online from the manufacturer.
Health/Toxics
Children's Health
The Environment
Our Food
Our Water
Consumer Products
BodyBurden
Pet Health
Farming
Farm Subsidies
Black Farmers
Natural Resources
Fishing Subsidies
Mining
Oil & Gas
Water Subsidies
Chemical Industry
Energy Choices
Biofuels
Nuclear Waste
Transportation
Increase Text Size

Decrease Text Size
PRIVACY
EWG for:
SCIENTISTS
JOURNALISTS
POLICY MAKERS
Us
Contact Us

Cell Phone Radiation Binder The More You Know

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cell Phone Radiation Binder The More You Know

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cell Phone Radiation - Science Review on Cancer Risks and Children's Health

Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Restore Neuron Growth in the Brain

Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation Youre Getting

Patents Prove Cell-Phone Dangers?

Limit Your Exposure To Cell Phone Radiation

CELL PHONES LISTED BELOW

| Environmental Working Group

The Power of Information

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (1 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM

| Environmental Working Group

Birth defects and

Expert interviewees available

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (2 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM

| Environmental Working Group

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (3 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM

| Environmental Working Group

At EWG, our team of

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (4 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM

| Environmental Working Group

cell phone radiation -> get a safer phone

Best and Worst Phones

BEST PHONES (low radiation)

WORST PHONES (high

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (5 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM

| Environmental Working Group

Samsung SGH-t229 [TMobile]

Kyocera Jax S1300

Samsung Rugby (SGHa837) [AT&T]

Samsung Propel Pro

Motorola W385 [U.

Samsung Gravity (SGHt459) [CellularONE, TMobile]

T-Mobile Sidekick [TMobile]

Motorola Karma QA1

Sanyo Katana II [Kajeet]

Best and Worst PDAs/Smartphones

BEST PHONES (low radiation)

WORST PHONES (high

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (6 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM

| Environmental Working Group

Kyocera Jax S1300

Palm Treo 600

Samsung Propel Pro

Samsung Gravity (SGHt459) [CellularONE, TMobile]

Blackberry Storm 9500

Palm Treo 650

Blackberry Storm 9530

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (7 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM

| Environmental Working Group

Increase Text Size

| Environmental Working Group

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone (9 of 9)9/11/2009 2:13:18 PM

| Environmental Working Group

The Power of Information

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?allavailable=1 (1 of 26)9/11/2009 2:14:59 PM

| Environmental Working Group

Birth defects and

Expert interviewees available

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?allavailable=1 (2 of 26)9/11/2009 2:14:59 PM

| Environmental Working Group

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?allavailable=1 (3 of 26)9/11/2009 2:14:59 PM

| Environmental Working Group

At EWG, our team of

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?allavailable=1 (4 of 26)9/11/2009 2:14:59 PM