Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ii
iii
iv
FEBRUARY 2007
ii
iii
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All praise be to Allah the Merciful, the Benevolent to Whom all will return
and Whose knowledge is infinite, eternal.
I would like to first thank my supervisor Associate Professor Dr. Ahmad
Khairi Bin Abd Wahab whose guidance, counsel and support were critical to the
direction, focus and completion of this thesis.
I am indebted to my employer the Department of Irrigation and Drainage
Malaysia and the Public Services Department Malaysia for providing me the
opportunity and the financial means to pursue this study, and especially to Ir. Tan
King Seng, Director of Coastal Engineering Division for his personal and professional
support.
My thanks extend to Khairol Azuan Bin Adam of the National Hydraulic
Institute of Malaysia for his assistance, comments and advice on numerical modelling
and the staff of the Coastal Engineering Division, Department of Irrigation and
Drainage Malaysia for their immense support.
And not in the least, my deepest and eternal gratitude to my wife Noriah
Binti Abu Bakar whose strength, love and encouragement were beacons in all my
pursuits.
ABSTRACT
component of beach-fill design and is measured in the field from the study of
periodical surveys over the same beach profiles. The Hallermeier equation which
relies on the incident pre-breaking wave height is the only analytical means to predict
the depth of closure. This study has examined the applicability of the Hallermeier
equation in predicting depth of closure for the coastline of Pantai Sabak, Kelantan
using nearshore waves which were transformed from offshore waves through
numerical modelling. The predicted depth of closure was compared against measured
depth of closure at 13 profiles that were surveyed in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2004. The
widely-accepted Standard Deviation of Depth Change (SDDC) and Fixed Depth
Change (FDC) methods to determine Dc were both explored and the Dc for monsoon,
annual and 5-year events were investigated. The research found that along the study
shoreline at Pantai Sabak, more than one closure point can occur across the same
profile over the seasonal and annual period. Hallermeiers equation overpredicts
annual Dc by 43% and affirms previous findings that the predictive equation
determines an upper limit value of Dc. Within the limitations of the survey data
available, the annual depth of closure at Pantai Sabak can be equated to 1.5 times
H0.137.
vi
ABSTRAK
Kedalaman Tetap telah digunakan untuk menentukan Dc bagi keadaan tengkujuh atau
monsun timur-laut, tempoh tahunan dan untuk tempoh 5 tahun. Penyiasatan ini telah
mendapati bahawa lebih daripada satu kedalaman tertutup boleh wujud dalam profil
yang sama.
didapati tinggi dengan lebihan purata 43% dan ini mengesahkan hasil kajian-kajian
terdahulu yang menyatakan bahawa persamaan ini boleh menentukan nilai had teratas
untuk Dc. Tertakluk kepada data ukur yang terhad di Pantai Sabak, kedalaman tertutup
tahunan boleh disamakan dengan 1.5 kali ketinggian ombak H0.137.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
TITLE
DECLARATION
ii
DEDICATION
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
iv
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
vii
LIST OF TABLES
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
xix
LIST OF SYMBOLS
xx
LIST OF APPENDICES
PAGE
INTRODUCTION
xxii
1.1
Introduction
1.2
1.2.3
1.3
1.4
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1
Introduction
2.2
8
8
Beach Profiles
2.3
2.4
Methods of Determination
12
2.4.1
Predictive Methods
12
2.4.2
15
2.4.3
16
2.5
18
2.6
19
2.7
Summary
21
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
23
3.1
Introduction
23
3.2
24
3.3
Research Methodology
27
27
3.3.2
28
3.3.3
Numerical Modelling
29
3.3.4
Analysis
30
3.4
30
3.3.6
31
Summary
31
33
4.1
Introduction
33
4.2
Study Area
34
4.3
35
4.4
Data Sets
36
4.5
36
4.5.1
37
Survey #1 - 1998
ix
4.5.2
Survey #2 - 1999
37
4.5.3
Survey #3 - 2000
38
4.5.4
Survey #4 - 2004
38
38
4.5.6
42
4.6
Sediment Data
42
4.7
Wave
44
4.7.1
45
4.7.2
Measured Waves
50
4.8
Tidal Heights
52
4.9
Wind
54
4.10
Summary
55
NUMERICAL MODELLING
57
5.1
Introduction
57
5.2
Model Description
57
5.3
Numerical Modelling
59
5.3.1
59
5.3.2
59
5.4
5.3.3 Calibration
61
5.3.4
66
Summary
77
79
6.1
Introduction
79
6.2
80
6.2.1
Definition
80
6.2.2
81
6.3
84
6.4
84
6.5
6.4.1
84
6.4.2
84
6.4.3
87
6.4.4
88
6.4.5
91
6.4.6
95
6.4.7
97
Annual Dc (1999-2000)
100
6.5.1
100
6.5.2
Annual Dc at Ch.3100
101
6.5.3
Annual Dc at Ch.2700
102
6.5.4
Annual Dc at Ch.1500
103
6.5.5
Annual Dc at Ch.1200
104
6.5.6
Annual Dc at Ch.800
105
6.5.7
Annual Dc at Ch.400
106
6.5.8
Annual Dc at Ch.200
107
6.5.9
Annual Dc at Ch.00
108
109
6.6
111
6.7
Time-interval Dc (1999-2004)
113
6.7.1
113
6.7.2
Five-year Dc at Ch.3100
114
6.7.3
Five-year Dc at Ch.2700
115
6.7.4
Five-year Dc at Ch.1500
116
6.7.5
Five-year Dc at Ch.1200
117
6.7.6
Five-year Dc at Ch.800
118
6.7.7
Five-year Dc at Ch.400
119
6.7.8
Five-year Dc at Ch.200
120
6.7.9
Five-year Dc at Ch.00
121
122
6.8
124
6.9
126
xi
6.10
127
6.11
Simplified Dc Equations
129
6.12
Observation
131
133
7.1
General Conclusions
133
7.2
135
7.2.1
135
7.2.2
Wave Data
135
136
7.2.4
136
REFERENCES
APPENDICES A - E
138
142-174
xii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO.
TITLE
PAGE
4.1
40
4.2
41
4.3
47
4.4
53
4.6
53
4.7
54
4.8
54
5.1
63
5.2
74
75
6.1
99
6.2
99
6.3
111
6.4
125
5.3
5.4
67
6.5
127
6.6
128
6.7
130
6.8
130
xiv
LIST OF FIGURES
NO.
1.1
TITLE
PAGE
10
3.1
Research Model
26
4.1
34
4.2
35
4.3
39
4.4
43
43
4.6
44
4.7
45
46
4.9
47
4.10
48
1.2
2.1
4.5
4.8
xv
4.11
49
4.12
50
4.13
51
51
52
55
58
62
64
64
65
5.6
67
5.7
68
69
69
70
70
4.14
4.15
4.16
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.8
5.9
5.10
5.11
xvi
5.12
71
71
72
72
73
76
77
6.1
Monsoon Dc at Ch.3100
85
6.2
Monsoon Dc at Ch.2700
86
6.3
Monsoon Dc at Ch.2300
87
6.4
Monsoon Dc at Ch.1900
88
6.5
Monsoon Dc at Ch.1500
89
6.6
Monsoon Dc at Ch.1200
90
6.7
Monsoon Dc at Ch.800
91
6.8
Monsoon Dc at Ch.400
92
6.9
Monsoon Dc at Ch.200
93
6.10
Monsoon Dc at Ch.00
94
6.11
Monsoon Dc at Ch.-400
95
6.12
96
6.13
97
5.13
5.14
5.15
5.16
5.17
5.18
xvii
6.14
100
6.15
Annual Dc at Ch.3100
101
6.16
Annual Dc at Ch.2700
102
6.17
Annual Dc at Ch.1500
103
6.18
Annual Dc at Ch.1200
104
6.19
Annual Dc at Ch.800
105
6.20
Annual Dc at Ch.400
106
6.21
Annual Dc at Ch.200
107
6.22
Annual Dc at Ch.00
108
6.23
Annual Dc at Ch.-400
109
6.24
110
6.25
Annual Dc at Ch.-1400
110
6.26
112
112
114
6.29
5-year Dc at Ch.2700
115
6.30
5-year Dc at Ch.1500
116
6.31
5-year Dc at Ch.1200
117
6.32
5-year Dc at Ch.800
118
6.33
119
6.34
5-year Dc at Ch.200
120
6.35
5-year Dc at Ch.00
121
6.36
5-year Dc at Ch.-400
122
6.27
6.28
xviii
6.37
5-year Dc at Ch.-900
123
6.38
5-year Dc at Ch.-1400
123
6.39
125
126
6.41
129
6.42
132
6.40
xix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CED
CEM
cm
centimeter
DHI
DID
DSMM
HAT
Kg.
LAT
LSD
meter
mm
millimeter
MSL
MHW
MHHW
MLHW
MLW
MHLW
MLLW
Sg.
SSMO
UKMO
xx
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Dc
depth of closure
Dc,1-yr
Dc,5-yr
Dci
Dcm
Dco
Dl
Dl,t
Dl,1-yr
Dl,5-yr
water depth
di
dl
d50
hc
Hm0
Hs
Hs50
Hl,t
H0.137
H0.027
He,t
kN
xxi
standard deviation
time
Te, t
Tm
Tp
Ub
xi
measurement
xm
number of measurements
xxii
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX
TITLE
165
159
142
PAGE
168
23
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Introduction
Beach nourishment is a preferred coastal protection measure for recreational
beaches. The provision of a wider dry beach, by placing sand on the eroding shore
that extends beyond the existing beach berm, is the main component of a beach
nourishment scheme. A re-nourished beach presents a wider surface area that both
dissipates wave energy impacting on the shoreline and creates more space for
recreational activities. Sand re-nourished beaches remain as a part of the nearshore
coastal system within which sediment can be moved freely by wave and tidal action.
Inherent in the engineering design of beach nourishment is an element of
prediction and projection based on the shoreline change trend of the concerned
beach.
An
important aspect of beach nourishment design is the knowledge of the seaward limit
to which the beach-fill is expected to move. This point is called the depth of
closureand its determination involves the study of the nearshore profile over a period
of time.
24
Hence, the
1.2
1.2.1
(ii)
25
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
1.2.2
Study Shoreline
The northeast coastline of Kelantan has been selected for this study due to its
long-term erosion trend. This coastline is oriented along the northwest to southeast
direction. Wind fetch lengths spanning over 1500 km across the South China Sea
influence this stretch of coast. As a result, the long fetch and the predominant
northeasterly winds during the northeast monsoon combine to generate high waves in
the adjacent offshore area (Department of Irrigation and Drainage, 1993).
Furthermore, there are no large islands off the Kelantan coast to offer any cover from
the monsoonal waves.
The study is limited to the coastline from Kg. Pantai Dasar to Kg. S.P. Besar,
Kelantan which is shown in Figure 1.1.
coastline has experienced erosion at an average rate of exceeding 5 meters per year
(Unit Perancang Ekonomi, 1985).
26
Studies by
nourishment scheme took into account the reduction in sediment budget due to the
breakwater, nearly 60% of the nourished volume was lost within a single monsoon
(Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran Malaysia, 2002).
KELANTAN
Study Area
Figure 1.1: Study area - 4.5 km of shoreline from Pantai Dasar Sabak to South of
Kg. K.S.P. Besar (Sungai Pengkalan Datu). (Source: Topo Maps #4068 [1985],
#3968 [1991], Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia)
27
1.2.3
parameters as other coastal protection solutions. Apart from the established wave,
wind and tidal conditions, the design criteria for a typical DID beach nourishment
includes:
the availability of suitable sand-fill of grain size d50 greater than the
native beach.
From the Shore Protection Manual (US Army Corps Of Engineers, 1984), the
design approach can be summarised as follows: (i) determination of the beach berm
elevation and width (ii) determination of nourishment volume based on native and
borrow composite material characteristics (iii) determination of post-project beach
evolution.
In practice, a pre-erosion shoreline is determined and the berm width is
overbuilt beyond the pre-erosion shoreline position based on local erosion rates and
the expected interval of re-nourishment. Hence, if the local erosion rate is 5 meters
per year and a re-nourishment is planned after every five years, the berm width will
be built 25 meters beyond the desired shoreline. Artificial beach fills are created
based on a construction cross-section. Over time and due to the action of waves and
tides, the fill material forming the nourished profile of a constructed beach will be
shaped by natural processes into a profile of generally concave upward shape called
an equilibrium profile. This equilibrium profile concept was proposed by Bruun
(1954) with further elaboration by Dean (1977) and is illustrated in Figure 1.2. In
the application of this concept, it is assumed that there is a conservation of sediment
28
Evolved
equilibrium
profile
Original nourished
profile
Original
ground
level
Dc = depth
of closure
volume across the profile and that a loss of sand volume from the upper profile of the
beach is associated with a similar gain in volume in the lower profile. The seaward
limit for the volume exchange process is the depth of closure.
The depth of closure is effectively, the offshore limit of the active zone
within which a nourished beach adjusts to equilibrium under the prevailing coastal
conditions. Hence, a good estimate of the depth of closure is essential to a good
estimate of the beach fill volume required. With respect to post-nourishment beach
profiles, National Research Council (1995) refers to the depth of closure as a
reference typically used by designers to estimate the limit of profile widening.
These statements further confirm the importance of the depth of closure in beach
nourishment design.
Beach nourishment schemes have been built in Malaysia since 1992 but their
evolution has not been extensively studied. Due to the lack or absence of periodical
surveys then, the depth of closure has typically been predicted from empirical
equations. With regards to this, a comparative study of the predictive and measured
29
1.3
stretch of sandy coast extending from north of Pantai Dasar Sabak to south of the
Sungai Pengkalan Datu in the state of Kelantan. The study will analyse beach profile
surveys, determine the depths of closure and to compare them against predicted
values calculated from the Hallermeier equation.
1.4