Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Object The authors report the 6-year results of the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT). This ongoing randomized trial, with the final goal of a 10-year follow-up, compares the safety and efficacy of surgical clip occlusion and endovascular coil embolization in patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from a ruptured aneurysm. The
1- and 3-year results of this trial have been previously reported.
Methods In total, 500 patients with an SAH met the entry criteria and were enrolled in the study. Of these patients, 471
were randomly assigned to the treatments: 238 to surgical clipping and 233 to endovascular coiling. Six patients who died
before treatment and 57 patients with nonaneurysmal SAHs were excluded, leaving a total of 408 patients who underwent
clipping (209 assigned) or coiling (199 assigned). Whether to treat patients within the assigned group or to cross over
patients to the other group was at the discretion of the treating physician; 38% (75/199) of the patients assigned to coiling
were crossed over to clipping and 1.9% (4/209) assigned to clipping were crossed over to coiling. The outcome data were
collected by a dedicated nurse practitioner. The primary outcome analysis was based on the assigned treatment group;
poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 2 and was independently adjudicated. Six years
after randomization, 336 (82%) of 408 patients who had been treated were available for examination.
Results On the basis of an mRS score of > 2, and similar to the results at the 3-year follow-up, no significant difference
in outcomes (p = 0.24) was detected between the 2 treatment groups. Complete aneurysm obliteration at 6 years was
achieved in 96% (111/116) of the clipping group and in 48% (23/48) of the coiling group (p < 0.0001). In the period between
the 3- and 6-year follow-ups, 3 additional patients assigned to coiling and none assigned to clipping received retreatment,
for overall retreatment rates of 4.6% (13/280) for clipping and 16.4% (21/128) for coiling (p < 0.0001).
When aneurysm location was considered, the 6-year results continued to match the previously reported results, with no
difference in outcome for anterior circulation aneurysms at most time points. Of the anterior circulation aneurysms assigned to coiling treatment, 42% (70/168) were crossed over to clipping treatment. The outcomes for posterior circulation
aneurysms continued to favor coiling. The randomization process was unexpectedly skewed, with 18 of 21 treated aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) being assigned to clipping, but even when PICA aneurysms were
removed from the analysis, outcomes for the posterior circulation aneurysms still favored coiling.
Conclusions Although BRAT was statistically underpowered to detect small differences, these results suggest little
difference in outcome between the 2 treatments for anterior circulation aneurysms. This was not the case for the posterior circulation aneurysms, where coil embolization appeared to provide a sustained advantage over clipping. Aneurysm
obliteration rates in BRAT were significantly lower and retreatment rates significantly higher in the patients undergoing
coiling than in those undergoing clipping. However, despite the fact that retreatment rates were higher after coiling, no
recurrent hemorrhages were known to have occurred in patients undergoing coiling in BRAT who were followed up for
6 years. Sufficient questions remain about the relative benefits of the 2 treatment modalities to warrant further welldesigned randomized trials.
Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01593267 (clinicaltrials.gov)
http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2014.9.JNS141749
Key Words BRAT; clip occlusion; coil embolization; intracranial aneurysm; ISAT; randomized trial; subarachnoid
hemorrhage; vascular disorders
Abbreviations BRAT = Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial; ISAT = International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; PICA = posterior inferior
cerebellar artery; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage.
accompanying editorial See pp 605608. DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS142261.
submitted July 29, 2014. accepted September 30, 2014.
include when citing Published online June 26, 2015; DOI: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS141749.
Disclosure Dr. McDougall is a consultant for Covidien, Microvention, and Codman. Funding for this manuscript came from the Barrow Neurological Foundation and the
Hanley Aneurysm Fund.
AANS, 2015
609
R. F. Spetzler et al.
ndovascular coil embolization and surgical clip occlusion are the currently accepted treatment options
for patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Since the publication of results from the International
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) in 2002, endovascular treatment has become the mainstay in many centers,
especially in Europe.6 The 1-year results of ISAT showed
that for the treatment of ruptured aneurysms, coil embolization was superior to clip occlusion, but most of the trial
patients had small aneurysms in the anterior circulation
and were in good clinical condition. Therefore, evidence
that the 1-year ISAT results apply to all patients with aneurysms or that the ISAT results could be replicated has
been lacking. To address the issue of the broader applicability of the ISAT results, the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm
Trial (BRAT) used a prospective intent-to-treat design that
randomized all patients admitted with a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The 1- and 3-year results
have been published previously,5,10 and we present here
the 6-year results of BRAT. The BRAT remains an ongoing trial with a final follow-up to occur 10 years after
enrollment.
Methods
FIG. 1. Flow chart showing assignments and actual treatments of the patients in this study. Clip/Clip = assigned to and treated by
surgical clipping; Clip/Coil = assigned to clipping and crossed over to coil embolization; Coil/Coil = assigned to and treated by coil
embolization; Coil/Clip = assigned to coil embolization and treated by clipping.
ties and both age > 50 years and Hunt and Hess grade > II
were investigated by including these terms in the model.
Because these interaction terms were not significant, they
were excluded from the final model.
We then conducted secondary analyses of outcome
based on actual treatment using logistic regression models
as described above for the assigned treatment. Rates of rebleeding and retreatment were compared using odds ratios
calculated from 2 2 tables using Stata v12.
Results
Primary Outcome
For the primary outcome, 57 (35%) of 162 coil-assigned
patients and 72 (41%) of 174 clip-assigned patients had a
Crossover Analysis
Of the 75 patients who were crossed over to clipping
after assignment to coiling, 61 were available for analysis
at the 6-year follow-up. Among these coil-to-clip patients,
46% (28/61) had a poor outcome, compared with 29%
(29/101) of those in the uncrossed coil group (p = 0.03).
TABLE 1. Proportion of patients with mRS scores > 2 across the BRAT follow-ups to date by assigned treatment*
Treatment Assignment
Time Point
No. of Patients
Available for
Analysis
No. of Patients
(%)
No. of Patients
(%)
OR (95% CI)
p Value
At discharge
6 mos
1 yr
3 yrs
3 yrsCF
6 yrs
6 yrsCF
406
341
358
349
366
336
365
127/198
40/171
42/174
51/170
51/178
57/162
60/177
64.1
23.4
24.1
30.0
28.7
35.2
33.9
147/208
62/170
64/184
64/179
64/188
72/174
73/188
70.7
36.5
34.8
35.8
34.0
41.4
38.8
1.35 (0.892.05)
1.88 (1.183.03)
1.68 (1.062.67)
1.30 (0.832.04)
1.29 (0.832.00)
1.30 (0.842.02)
1.24 (0.811.90)
0.16
0.009
0.03
0.25
0.27
0.24
0.33
Coil
Clip
611
R. F. Spetzler et al.
Actual
Aneurysm Location
Because ISAT predominantly included patients with
anterior circulation aneurysms (97.3% of all patients), we
compared our results separately for the anterior and posterior circulation aneurysms. As previously reported, 5 we
noted a marked difference in the crossover rate (Table 2)
and in outcomes when the data were analyzed by aneurysm location. For the anterior circulation, except at the
6-month follow-up when clipping showed a significantly
worse outcome in the actual treatment group, no statistically significant difference in outcome was detected at the
other time points, including the 6-year follow-up (Table 3).
However, for the posterior circulation cohort, mRS scores
were significantly better in the coil-assigned arm at every
measured time point, including the latest 6-year follow-up
(Table 4).
Of all 408 treated patients, most (339 [83%]) had anterior circulation aneurysms; about one-fifth (69 [17%])
had posterior circulation aneurysms. Most crossovers occurred in the anterior circulation group, in which 70 of
the 168 patients (42%) assigned to coiling were crossed
over to clipping, whereas only 1 of 171 patients (0.6%) was
crossed over from clipping to coiling. In the posterior circulation group, 16% (5/31) of patients were crossed over
from coiling to clipping, and 8% (3/38) of patients were
crossed over from clipping to coiling (Table 2).
For the anterior circulation aneurysms, the 2 treatment
cohorts were almost equally represented among the various anatomical locations of the aneurysm in this region
Aneurysm
Location
Clip
Coil
Clip
Coil
Clip to
Coil
Coil to
Clip
Ant circulation
Post circulation
171
38
168
32
240
40
99
29
0.6
8.0
42.0
16.0
TABLE 3. Proportion of patients with anterior circulation aneurysms and mRS scores > 2 at the BRAT follow-ups to
date by assigned treatment
Time Point
Treatment
No. of Patients
Available for
Analysis
No. of Patients
(%)
No. of Patients
(%)
p Value
337
285
297
287
304
272
301
107/167
36/145
37/146
44/142
44/150
48/133
51/148
64.1
24.8
25.3
31.0
29.3
36.1
34.5
114/170
42/140
43/151
43/145
43/154
50/139
51/153
67.1
30.0
28.5
29.7
27.9
36.0
33.3
0.56
0.33
0.57
0.81
0.79
0.98
0.84
337
285
297
287
304
272
301
58/99
16/88
18/87
21/84
21/89
24/78
25/87
58.6
18.2
20.7
25.0
23.6
30.8
28.7
163/238
62/197
62/210
66/203
66/215
74/194
77/214
68.5
31.5
29.5
32.5
30.7
38.1
36.0
0.08
0.02
0.12
0.21
0.21
0.25
0.23
Assigned Treatment
Discharge
6 mos
1 yr
3 yrs
3 yrsCF*
6 yrs
6 yrsCF
Actual Treatment
Discharge
6 mos
1 yr
3 yrs
3 yrsCF*
6 yrs
6 yrsCF
Coil*
Clip*
* Includes patients seen at the 1-year follow-up, but not at the 3-year follow-up.
p values were calculated with 2 tests. In total, 339 patients were available for analysis (168 patients assigned to coiling and 171 to clipping;
99 underwent coiling and 240 clipping). Data for discharge and the 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year follow-ups for the assigned treatment and the
3-year carry-forward follow-up in the actual treatment have been previously reported.5,10
Includes patients seen at the 1- and 3-year follow-ups, but not at the 6-year follow-up; it does not include patients no longer in the study and
patients who could not be contacted at the 1-, 3-, and 6-year follow-ups.
612
TABLE 4. Patients with posterior circulation aneurysms and an mRS score > 2
Time Point
Assigned Treatment
Discharge
6 mos
1 yr
3 yrs
3 yrsCF*
6 yrs
6 yrsCF
Actual Treatment
3 yrsCF*
6 yrsCF
Treatment
No. of Patients
Available for
Analysis (n)
No. of Patients
(%)
No. of Patients
(%)
p Value
69
56
61
62
62
64
64
20/31
4/26
5/28
7/28
7/28
9/29
9/29
64.5
15.4
17.9
25.0
25.0
31.0
31.0
33/38
20/30
21/33
21/34
21/34
22/35
22/35
86.8
66.7
63.6
61.8
61.8
62.9
62.9
0.03
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.004
0.004
0.01
0.01
62
64
7/26
8/27
26.9
29.6
21/36
23/37
58.3
62.1
0.01
0.01
Coil*
Clip*
* Includes patients seen at the 1-year follow-up, but not at the 3-year follow-up.
p values were calculated with 2 tests. In total, 69 patients were available for analysis (31 patients assigned to coiling and 38 to clipping).
Data for discharge and the 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year follow-ups for the assigned treatment and the 3-year carry-forward follow-up in the
actual treatment have been previously reported.5,10
Includes patients seen at the 1- and 3-year follow-ups, but not at the 6-year follow-up; it does not include patients no longer in the study and
patients who could not be contacted at the 1-, 3-, and 6-year follow-ups.
613
R. F. Spetzler et al.
PICA
Non-PICA
p Value
Discharge
1 yr
3 yrs
6 yrs
19/21 (90.5)
11/18 (61.1)
11/18 (61.1)
12/19 (63.2)
255/387 (65.9)
95/340 (27.9)
104/331 (31.4)
117/317 (36.9)
0.02
0.003
0.009
0.02
Discussion
TABLE 6. Patients with aneurysms in all locations except PICA and mRS scores > 2 across the BRAT follow-ups to
date*
Treatment Assignment
Time of
Assessment
No. of Patients
Available for
Analysis
No. of Patients
(%)
No. of Patients
(%)
OR
(95% CI)
p
Value
Discharge
6 mos
1 yr
3 yrs
3 yrsCF
6 yrs
6 yrsCF
385
326
340
331
344
317
346
125/195
40/169
42/171
50/167
50/172
56/159
59/174
64.1
23.7
24.6
29.9
29.1
35.2
33.9
130/190
52/157
53/169
54/164
54/172
61/158
62/172
68.4
33.1
31.4
32.9
31.4
38.6
36.0
1.21 (0.791.85)
1.60 (0.982.60)
1.40 (0.872.26)
1.15 (0.721.83)
1.12 (0.701.77)
1.16 (0.731.83)
1.10 (0.711.71)
0.37
0.06
0.16
0.56
0.64
0.53
0.68
Coil
Clip
* ORs, CIs, and p values were determined with unadjusted logistic regression. In total, 387 patients were available for analysis at randomization (196 patients assigned to coiling and 191 to clipping).
Includes patients seen at the 1-year follow-up but not at the 3-year follow-up.
Includes patients seen at the 1- and 3-year follow-ups but not at the 6-year follow-up; it does not include patients no longer in the study and
patients who could not be contacted at the 1-, 3-, and 6-year follow-ups.
Coil
Clip
p Value
No
Yes
107 (83.6)
21 (16.4)
267 (95.4)
13 (4.6)
<0.0001
Clip
Time of
Assessment
No. of
Aneurysms
(%)
No. of
Aneurysms
(%)
p Value
Postop
3 yrs
6 yrs
73/126
36/69
23/48
57.9
52.2
47.9
229/269
122/140
111/116
85.1
87.1
95.7
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
* Data for the postoperative and 3-year follow-ups have been previously
reported.5,10
J Neurosurg Volume 123 September 2015
615
R. F. Spetzler et al.
Coil
Clip
Before Tx
Total after Tx up to 1 yr
After 1 yr
Total after Tx (after approx 9 yrs)
17 (7)
28 (15)
17 (7)
45 (22)
28 (19)
11 (5)
7 (6)
18 (11)
Conclusions
TABLE 10. Comparison between ISAT and BRAT of outcomes, status at presentation, and aneurysm location*
mRS >2 at 1 yr
HH/WFNS Grade at
Presentation
Aneurysm Location
in Circulation
Study
Coil Group
Clip Group
I or II
IV or V
Ant
Post
Eligible
Randomized
ISAT
BRAT (coil-coil)
24
20
31
~20
88
60
<5
16
97
100
3
0
22
48
References
1. Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Lawton MT, Duckwiler GR, Gress DR: Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke
39:120125, 2008
2. Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, Saari T, Hernesniemi
J, Vapalahti M: Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A prospective
randomized study. Stroke 31:23692377, 2000
3. Li ZQ, Wang QH, Chen G, Quan Z: Outcomes of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Int Med Res 40:21452151,
2012
4. McDougall CG, Johnston SC, Gholkar A, Barnwell SL,
Vazquez Suarez JC, Mass Romero J, et al: Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial
aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:935942, 2014
5. McDougall CG, Spetzler RF, Zabramski JM, Partovi S, Hills
NK, Nakaji P, et al: The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J
Neurosurg 116:135144, 2012
6. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M,
Shrimpton J, et al: International Subarachnoid Aneurysm
Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular
coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:12671274, 2002
7. Molyneux AJ, Clarke A, Sneade M, Mehta Z, Coley S, Roy
D, et al: Cerecyte coil trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling
of cerebral aneurysms with either cerecyte or bare platinum
coils. Stroke 43:25442550, 2012
8. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Birks J, Ramzi N, Yarnold J, Sneade
M, et al: Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death,
or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term
follow-up. Lancet Neurol 8:427433, 2009
9. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, et al: International subarachnoid aneurysm trial
(ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a
randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency,
seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.
Lancet 366:809817, 2005
10. Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Albuquerque FC, Zabramski
JM, Hills NK, Partovi S, et al: The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 3-year results. J Neurosurg 119:146157, 2013
11. White PM, Lewis SC, Gholkar A, Sellar RJ, Nahser H,
Cognard C, et al: Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial
aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet
377:16551662, 2011
Author Contributions
Correspondence
617