Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Description
According to the 16th Century philosopher Rene Descartes, I think, therefore I am. The insatiable quest for
knowledge and unwavering pursuit to explain nature and existence has been the defining feature of humans as a
species. In this quest, theory is central as humans attempted, throughout history, to explain the world in a systematic
fashion. Ancient Greek philosophers have wondered about the purpose of human existence and proposed schemas in
organizing societies. Their 16th Century counterparts during the renaissance continued this endeavour as they used
reason and logic to explain social phenomena and anticipate the future. At the dawn of the Industrial Revolution and
the ascendance of the natural science, philosophers imputed the principles of the scientific method to explain
changes in society and its constituent relationships within. This became the precursor for the rise of social sciences
such as economics, political science, psychology and sociology.
Since then, the social sciences have gained prominence in the realm of politics and order making. Contemporary
social science, in the light of an increasingly globalized world, has used its influence to shape global politics,
economics and culture; as well, as the development agenda. From the time of the Ancient Greeks to the
contemporary times, social science and philosophy had a huge stake in the change agenda (or the lack thereof); its
implications to policy and had huge implications to peoples lives. Similarly, social theory has also inspired
countless individuals, groups and communities to push the limits of social science through research or mobilize to
affect change.
This course is a series of seminars about the dominant social theories in the field of development. The course shall
have classical modern theories on development as its departure point for discussion. It shall then proceed in
discussing contemporary perspectives and debates. Throughout the course, the seminars shall locate the historical
foundations of the theories, its major arguments and explore its analytical limitations. Finally, in-seminar
discussions shall likewise explore its implications to development, especially to communities.
Objectives
By the end of the course, the students shall be expected to able to:
1.
2.
3.
Critically engage the development theory by articulating its critique and its analytical limitations; and,
4.
Methodology
The course shall feature lecture, group reporting and class discussion as its main methodology for teaching. Lectures
shall be provided by the instructor in order to provide the relevant foundational knowledge for the development
theories. Students shall be asked to form groups and report on their assigned topics to launch the discussion and flag
analytical points and critique. Preceding lectures and group presentations are class-based discussions which shall
provide students with an avenue to share their thoughts and debate on ideas.
Requirements
1.
Two Engagement Exercises (30%) Students shall be asked to form in groups with three members. Each
group shall be assigned with two engagement exercises. At the start of the class, the group assigned shall
be asked to launch the discussion through an engagement of the readings provided by the instructor.
Students may also use supplemental books or articles for their respective reports. The reports of the student
must include a discussion of the: (1) historical context of the theory; (2) its main arguments; (3) analytical
value or significance; (4) its theoretical limitations; and, (5) questions they would like to pose for the class.
Students shall be given 30 minutes to launch the discussion. The report shall be followed by a brief lecture
from the instructor. Then, the class shall discuss the questions posed by the reporting group.
2.
Unannounced Quizzes (10%) Throughout the semester, unannounced quizzes shall be given in order to
gauge the level of understanding of students on a particular topic. This shall also form the basis for
checking the attendance of students.
3.
Middle of Semester Exam (30%) Both the middle and end of semester exam shall be take home
examinations. Questions for the middle and end of semester exam shall be given on 26 September 2015 and
28 November 2015. Students are required their examinations on the following Saturday thru the instructors
email (karlarvinhapal@gmail.com).
4.
Remarks
1.
Attendance shall be checked on the basis of class requirements. Failure to attend or being tardy during a
quiz shall result in failing marks unless the student has a valid reason and corresponding supporting
documents (i.e. medical certificate for sickness) as per University Guidelines. Late submission of the
middle and end of semester exams shall incur deductions. Submission of these exams a week after the
deadline shall result in failing marks.
2.
Students may ask for a 20 minute break anytime during class hours. They are also encouraged to bring food
or drinks in order to avoid leaving the classroom unnecessarily.
Outline
DATES
Session 1
23 January 2016
Session 2
30 January 2016
ASSIGNMENTS
(Chapter 1).
Classical and Neo-Classical Economic Theory
Session 3
6 February 2016
Required Readings:
Hartwick, R. & Peete, E. (2009) Theories of Development:
Contentions, Arguments and Alternatives. 2nd Edition. The Guilford
Press. London. (Chapter 2).
Karl Marx, Marxism, Neo-Marxism and Political Economy
Required Readings:
Session 4
13 February 2016
Session 5
20 February 2016
Session 6
27 February 2016
Session 8
12 March 2016
26 March 2016
9 April 2016
Session 11
16 April 2016
Session 12
23 April 2016
Session 13
30 April 2016
Required Readings:
Hartwick, R. & Peete, E. (2009) Theories of Development:
Contentions, Arguments and Alternatives. 2nd Edition. The Guilford
Press. London. (Chapter 6).
Gender, Identity, Reproductive Rights and Demographic
Transition
Required Readings:
Hartwick, R. & Peete, E. (2009) Theories of Development:
Contentions, Arguments and Alternatives. 2nd Edition. The Guilford
Session 15
14 May 2016
21 May 2016