Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The geotechnical engineers design foundations and other structures on the soil after
investigation of the type of soil, its characteristics and its extent. If the soil is good at
shallow depth below the ground surface, shallow foundation such as footings and
rafts, are generally most economical. However if the soil just below the ground
surface is not good but a strong stratum exist at a great depth, deep foundations, such
as piles, wells and caissons are required. Deep foundations are quite expensive and
are cost effective only in the where the structure to be supported is quite heavy and
huge. Sometimes the soil conditions are very poor even at greater depth and it is not
practical to construct even deep foundation. In such cases various methods of soil
stabilization and reinforcement technique is adopted. The objective is to improve the
characteristics at site and make soil capable of carrying load and to increase the shear
strength decrease the compressibility of the soil.
In the investigation done by S A Naeini and S M Sadjadi,(2008) ,the waste polymer
materials has been chosen as the reinforcement material and it was randomly included
in to the clayey soils with different plasticity indexes at five different percentages of
fiber content (0%, 1%,2%, 3%, 4%) by weight of raw soil.CBR tests are conducted by
Behzad Kalantari, Bujang B.K. Huat and Arun Prasad, (2010) and their experimental
findings are analysed with the point of view of use of waste plastic fibers in soil
reinforcement. Effects of Random Fiber Inclusion on Consolidation, Hydraulic
Conductivity, Swelling, Shrinkage Limit and Desiccation Cracking of Clays
(Mahmood R. Abdi, Ali Parsapajouh, and Mohammad A. Arjomand,(2008) ) point to
the strength and settlement characteristics of the reinforced soil and compared with
unreinforced condition.
Moreover an environmental concern is also included by utilization of waste
plastic materials and they can be made useful for improving the soil characteristics
and to solve problems related to the disposal of waste plastic material.
2. LITERATURE REVIEWS
1
Specification
Color
Natural
Specific gravity
0.91
Fiber Length
12 mm
Fiber Diameter
18 micron
Tensile strength
300-440 MPa
Elastic modulus
6000-9000 (N mm2)
Water absorption
none
Softening point
160 C
In order to examine the effect of cement admixtures and polypropylene fibers on the
CBR values of peat soil, index properties tests on the peat soil have been conducted.
The tests include: water content, liquid limit, plastic limit, organic content, specific
gravity and fiber content. Shear strength parameters of the undisturbed peat soil has
been found out by triaxial test and shear strength is found out by unconfined
compressive strength. Rowe cell consolidation test has been carried out to evaluate
the compressibility behavior of undisturbed peat soil. The CBR test has been carried
out on the stabilized peat soil (mixture of peat cement and polypropylene fibers) to
investigate the increase in strength of the samples. Peat soil samples used for the CBR
tests were at their natural moisture contents and therefore no water was added or
removed from the samples during the mixing process of peat, cement and
polypropylene fibers.
2.1.3 California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
CBR tests have been conducted on the undisturbed peat soil as well as stabilized peat
soil with cement and polypropylene fibers. For the stabilized peat soil with cement
(mixture of peat soil and cement) the soil samples used were samples at their natural
moisture contents of about 200%. Specified dosage of cement and polypropylene
fibers were mixed well with the peat soil for uniformity and homogeneity, before
molding the samples according to the specified standard. Stabilized peat soil samples
with cement and polypropylene fibers were placed in the CBR mold for air curing for
90 days. CBR tests were performed on samples under both, un-soaked and soaked
conditions.
2.1.4 Curing procedure
In order to cure the stabilized peat soil samples with cement and polypropylene fibers,
air curing technique has been used. In this technique, the stabilized peat soil samples
for CBR tests were kept in normal room temperature of 302C and relative humidity
of 805% without any addition of water from outside. This technique is used to
strengthen the stabilized peat soil samples by gradual moisture content reduction,
instead of the usual water curing technique or moist curing method which has been a
common practice in the past for stabilized peat soil mixed with cement . The principle
of using this air curing method for strengthening stabilized peat is that, peat soil has
very high natural water content and when mixed with cement has sufficient water for
3
curing or hydration process to take place and does not need more water (submerging
the samples in water) during the curing process. The technique used for curing
samples will cause the stabilized peat soil samples to gradually lose moisture content
during the curing period and become dry and thereby gain strength.
2.1.5 Cement dosages
For CBR (un-soaked and soaked) tests, each sample consists of peat soil at its natural
water content added with 15, 25, 30, 40 and 50% cement by weight of wet soil, with
and without polypropylene fibers as an additive. The amount of polypropylene fibers
used for the stabilized CBR soil samples was based on the result obtained from CBR
tests to be carried out to determine the optimum percentage by weight of the wet peat
soil samples.
2.1.6 Percentage of polypropylene fibers
The usual dosage recommended for cement mixes varies from 0.6-0.9 kg m3. In
this study, in order to find the optimum percentage of fiber content for the stabilized
peat soil that would provide the maximum strength, peat soil samples at their natural
water content were mixed with different percentages of cement and polypropylene
fibers and were cured in air for a period of 90 days and then CBR test was performed
on them. The samples examined for this purpose were prepared by adding 5, 15 and
25% cement and 0.1, 0.15, 0.2 and 0.5% polypropylene fibers. The sample which
showed the maximum value of CBR after 90 days of curing was chosen as the
optimum percentage of polypropylene fibers for further evaluation of strength of the
stabilized peat soil.
2.1.7
According to AASHTO T193-63 and ASTM D1883-73, the soaking period of CBR
samples for normal soil is 96 h or 4 days (Bowles, 1978). For this study, in-order to
investigate the CBR values of the soaked stabilized peat soil, a set of CBR samples
prepared with different dosages of cement and polypropylene fibers (15, 25, 40 and
50% cement with 0.15% of polypropylene fibers) to soil at its natural water content
were cured in air for 90 days and then soaked in water for a period of 5 weeks. During
these five weeks of soaking period, the soil samples were weighed periodically for
possible weight increase due to increased saturation. When the samples attained a
constant weight and no further increase in weight was observed, it was assumed that
the samples became completely saturated. The samples were weighed every day for
the first 2 weeks, every 2 days during the next 1 week and every 5days for the last 2
weeks.
Results
2.1.8 Optimum percentage of polypropylene fibers
The results of increase in CBR values for different cement and polypropylene fibers
content are shown in Fig. 2. It appears that the samples with 0.15% polypropylene
fibers gives the maximum percentage increase in of CBR value (ratio of obtained
CBR value/highest CBR value) after curing for 90 days.
Based on the results of this test, all stabilized peat soil samples were submerged in
water for at least 6 days before performing the CBR tests under soaked condition.
Fig.4 CBR (%) values of undisturbed peat and different percentage of OPC and
polypropylene fibers for the stabilized peat soil cured for 90 days
(S. A. Naeini et al., 2008)
The air curing technique of peat soil stabilized with cement and polypropylene fibers
increased the general rating of the in situ peat soil from very poor (CBR from 0-3%)
to fair and good (CBR from 7 to above 20%) (Bowles, 1978). Also, visual inspection
of soaked CBR samples depict that the polypropylene fibers not only increase the
CBR values but also contribute towards the uniformity and intactness to the stabilized
peat soil samples, as compared with the soaked samples with cement only.
2.2 SHEAR STRENGTH TEST
S. A. Naeini and S. M. Sadjadi, (2008) published the journal "effect of waste polymer
materials on the shear strength of unsaturated clays" and being a receiver of their
journal, their tests and results are analyzed.
2.3.1 Tested materials
Three clayey soils with different plasticity indexes used in the present experimental
testes were obtained from the three parts of Iran named as (soil A, soil B, soil C) They
are defined as high plasticity soils (CH) according to the Unified Soil Classification
System.
The grain-size distribution and engineering properties of the collected soils are
presented in table 2. The polypropylene fibers are shown in fig.5, fig 6.The rubber
fibers used in this study were obtained from polymer west materials. The scrap tire
rubber fibers were supplied by local recapping Track Tyres producer in Qazvin city of
Iran.
The shear stress-horizontal displacement curves obtained from the tests for reinforced
and unreinforced soils with the fiber content of 2% at normal stresses of 200 are
shown in Fig.7. It is seen that initial stiffness at the same normal stress for reinforced
and unreinforced soils remains practically the same. Therefore fiber reinforcements
have no discernible effect on the initial stiffness of the soils. It can be also seen that
the peak shear stresses are significantly affected by fiber content especially at high
normal stresses.
The increase in cohesion of soil-fiber matrix may be due to the increase in the
confining pressure because of the development of tension in the fiber, and the
moisture in the fiber helps to form absorbed water layer to the clay particles, which
enables the reinforced soil to act as single coherent matrix of soil fiber mass.
The decrease in cohesion of soil-fiber matrix with addition amount of fibers
(more than 2% fiber content) may be due to separation of clay particles due to the
addition of fibers. The maximum cohesion is observed at 2% fiber content as 110 kPa
for soil-A which is 1.12 times more than that of unreinforced samples, and 168 kPa
for soil-B which is a.05 times more than that of unreinforced samples and 194 kPa for
soil-C which is 1.04 times more than that of unreinforced samples.
These results showed that fiber reinforcement have more effect on soils with
low Plasticity Indexes. The variation of internal friction angle with fiber content,
illustrated in Fig.9 As seen, the variation of internal friction angle with tire rubber
fibers contents in showed a non-liner variation.
In general the internal friction angle value of each reinforced samples increased, and
these values in soil-A ranged from 27.3 to 37.4, in soil-B ranged from 20.35 to
25.64, and in soil-C ranged from 17.5 to 25.3.
11
The effects of scrap tire rubber fibers on shear strength values of clayey soils
are given in Figure 10.for soil A, B and C respectively. The contents of fiber played an
important role in the shear strength. Figure 9 indicate that the shear strength values of
clayey soil-fiber mixtures have a tendency to increase first, after a peak value, the
shear strength values of these mixtures decrease. It was found that the shear strength
values of unreinforced samples increased due to the raise of 2% tire rubber fiber
content from 142 to 177 kPa, from 189 to 210 kPa, and from 210.7 to 229 kPa for the
clayey soils A,B and C, respectively.
The maximum shear strength value of soil-A (soil with lower Plasticity Index) being
177 kPa is 1.24 times more than that of unreinforced samples. These findings
indicated that the optimum tire rubber fiber content based on shear strength values is
2%.
Soil Type: A soil comprised of a mixture of kaolinite and montmorillonite was used in
this research. Preliminary investigations conducted by the authors showed a mixture
of 75% kaolinite and 25% montmorillonite to be suitable. Not only it was workable, it
also showed pronounced consolidation settlement, swelling, hydraulic conductivity,
shrinkage limit and desiccation cracking characteristics. In order to be brief, instead of
referring to the above composition, the word "soil" is used here after. All soil particles
passed No. 200 sieve and hydrometer test data indicated 98% passing 0.071mm,
82.6% passing 0.036mm, 76.6% passing 0.021mm, 50.1% passing 0.009mm and
15.3% passing 0.001mm. Atterberg limits (ASTM D: 4318-87) and specific gravity
(ASTM D: 854-87) tests were also carried out on representative samples. The soil had
a liquid limit of 110(%), plastic limit of 29(%), plasticity index of 81(%), shrinkage
limit of 21(%) and specific gravity of 2.68.
Fiber Type: Most of the researches carried out on fiber reinforcement of soils have
made use of polypropylene fibers. This is the most commonly used synthetic material
mainly because of its low cost and the ease with which it mixes with soils [19, 21, 23,
24]. Miller and Rifai [25] also reported that polypropylene has a relatively high
melting point ( 160C), low thermal and electrical conductivity, high ignition point
( 590C), with a specific gravity of 0.91. It is also hydrophobic and chemically inert
material which does not absorb or react with soil moisture or leachate. Therefore, to
be consistent with earlier researches carried out, bearing in mind the foregoing
characteristics, polypropylene fibers having 5, 10 and 15mm lengths and contents of
1, 2, 4 and 8% by dry weight of soil were adopted in this research. Preliminary
investigations showed that longer and higher fiber contents could not be effectively
mixed with the soil and therefore were not investigated.
2.3 CONSOLIDATION TEST
2.3.1 Test procedure
In order to assess the effect of random fiber inclusion on consolidation settlement,
swelling and hydraulic conductivity, oedometer tests were Conducted according to
ASTM D2435-96. Earlier research conducted by Nataraj and McManis [21], Abdi and
Ebrahimi [23] and Miller and Rifai [25] had shown that fiber addition has little or no
effect on compaction characteristics. For that reason, in the current investigation all
13
samples were prepared using the same dry density and molding moisture content
equal to 70% of the liquid limit. Initially several kilograms of kaolinite and
montmorillonite were weighed and thoroughly mixed in dry form by appropriate
proportions of 75 and 25 percent respectively. The soil was kept in a container and all
samples were subsequently made using the same mixture. For each particular mixture
initially enough soil and appropriate amount of fiber were weighed and thoroughly
dry mixed. Then, water was gradually added and mixing continued until a uniform
mixture was obtained. Samples were then molded directly into the confining ring and
tested according to ASTM standard procedure. Pressure increments of 50, 100 and
200kPa were used and verification of the results was assessed by randomly selecting
and testing duplicate samples of some mixtures. A maximum difference of 5% was
observed in results of duplicate samples tested which were considered acceptable.
2.3.2 Consolidation Settlements Results
Effects of random fiber inclusion on consolidation settlement of soil samples were
evaluated as function of fiber length, content and consolidation pressure. These
relationships are shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3 for fiber lengths of 5, 10 and 15mm
respectively. Prior to the fiber inclusion, consolidation settlement of unreinforced soil
sample was determined. This settlement is also shown in the above figures to be used
as a reference behavior for comparison with those from different fibrous samples. It
can be observed from Figures 1, 2 and 3 that at a Constant pressure, increasing the
fiber contents from 1 to 8% resulted in reducing consolidation settlement of the
samples. This is a common trend with all fiber lengths examined. Maximum and
minimum consolidation settlements of 7.5 and 2.6 mm were respectively measured
for the unreinforced sample and the sample reinforced by 8% fibers having 5mm
length (e.g., Fig. 11). This shows a reduction in consolidation settlement of
approximately 25%. Although increasing the fiber length from 5 to 10mm resulted in
slightly higher consolidation settlements, but in general this soil characteristic did not
appear to be very sensitive to the fiber lengths. It can be speculated that random fiber
inclusion resulted in increasing stiffness of the samples and subsequently reduced the
consolidation settlements.
14
16
17
It can be seen that extensive, deep and wide cracks were formed in the
unreinforced sample. The reinforced sample, however, has mainly experienced
separation from the metal ring with no visible sign of cracks forming within the
sample. This clearly shows the effectiveness of random fiber inclusion in resisting and
reducing desiccation cracking which is of paramount importance in surface cracking
of clay covers used in landfills. Therefore, it can be concluded that random fiber
inclusion seems to be a practical and effective method of increasing tensile strength of
the clayey soils to resist volumetric changes.
18
Centrifuge tests were performed on fly ash without and with fiber reinforcement at
slope angle, = 78.6. Front and back sides of the container were covered with glass
plates. silicon grease was applied in the inner sides of the glass plates to minimize
the effect of friction. Figure 20 shows the dimensions of the slope model used in the
test for = 78.6. Width of the model taken was 7.5 cm. Remaining portion was
covered using geofoam pieces. To minimize the friction in between the soil and
geofoam, plastic sheets were used, after applying silicon grease. All samples were
made at optimum moisture content. Because the height and the base width of slope
19
Fig.16 Dimensions of the slope model used in centrifuge test, for = 78.6.
(Dushyant Kumar Bhardwaj et al., 2008)
3.2
TEST PROCEDURE
To observe the effect of fiber reinforcement in fly ash slope models all the centrifuge
tests were performed at 80 % compaction effort and all the necessary properties of fly
ash were calculated at 80 % compaction. Polypropylene fibers were mixed in the soil
1 % by dry weight of soil and water was taken according to the optimum moisture
content. After mixing the fiber in the soil at optimum moisture content, samples were
taken in three different and equal parts. Each part was compacted such that its width
should remain 2.5 cm to make the total width as 7.5 cm.
3.3
CENTRIFUGE MODELING
Small centrifuge present in IIT Bombay was used for the experiments. It is a
balanced beam type centrifuge. Potentiometers were used in the experiments to
measure the vertical displacements of the slope models.
Reading obtained from these potentiometers were not the actual displacements of the
slope models. To find out the actual displacements of the slope models, first these
potentiometers were calibrated.
20
Unreinforced Soil
(a) Unreinforced
(b) Reinforced
22
3.4
FACTOR OF SAFETY
Factor of safety of the slope models were found out by using student version of
software GEOSLOPE. This software uses the limit equilibrium theory to compute the
factor of safety of earth and rock slopes. Simplified Bishops method was used in
analysis the factor of safety. For the comparison of factor of safety between
unreinforced and reinforced slopes, factor of safety of all slope models were found out
at the same scale factor as that of unreinforced slopes. Values of minimum factor of
safety obtained from Bishops Method are given in Table 10.
Table 10 Factor of safety (FOS) obtained from Bishops Method.
(Dushyant Kumar Bhardwaj et al., 2008)
23
4. CONCLUSIONS
From a critical receiver of literature on the use of randomly distributed waste plastic
fibers for the stabilization of soil which are having very poor strength characteristics,
the following conclusions are drawn:
1. The soils are reinforced with randomly distributed polypropylene fibers
and the CBR values obtained for this type of soil is around 38% high than
the unreinforced soil. For the CBR test we have used cement as a binder,
even though the percentage of cement is
24
8. The shrinkage limit is showing a rising graph with both the increase in
fiber content and fiber length. It indicates that the soil is susceptible to less
volume change and it has got enough tensile strength with reinforcing.
9. Fiber reinforcement significantly reduced the extent and distribution of
cracks due to desiccation as observed by the reduced number, depth and
width of cracks. These results show that it can be used for covering waste
material in containments and also can be used for canal slopes.
10. Hydraulic conductivity is increasing with fiber content up to particular
limit.
11. Centrifuge modeling gives a clear idea about the performance of the fiber
reinforced soil and it points to the vast scope of this method of reinforcing
soil with waste plastic fibers.
12. The most important point is the environmental concern regarding the
effects of waste plastic in soil and the problems and threats that is related
with their excessive usage and disposal. This gives an effective solution to
waste treatment with the advent of soil reinforcement.
5. REFERENCES
25
Waste
26