Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BACKGROUND
In the 1960s, the first reports demonstrated that
flexor tendon lacerations within the confines of the
fibro-osseous flexor digital sheath could be repaired
primarily, and rehabilitation be carried out successfully, without excision of the lacerated tendons followed by primary tendon grafting.1,2 Major advances
in the understanding of intrasynovial flexor tendon
biology have been made since that time. The concept
of adhesion-free tendon healing has been validated
both in experimental and in clinical studies since that
time,36 lending support to efforts which attempt to
achieve a reliable technique of primary flexor tendon
repair and digital rehabilitation without the inevitable
need for later tenolysis because of ingrowth of restrictive adhesions from the surrounding sheath.
Despite advances in the repair and rehabilitation of
injured flexor tendons within the fibroosseous digital
sheath, the results, measured experimentally as
Correspondence and reprint requests to Martin I. Boyer, MD, MSc,
FRCS (C), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Hand
Surgery Service, Suite 11300, West Pavilion, One Barnes
Hospital Plaza, Saint Louis, MO 63110; e-mail: <boyerm@msnotes.
wustl.edu>.
doi:10.1197/j.jht.2005.01.009
80
ABSTRACT: Until recently, attempts to optimize the postoperative regimen following intrasynovial flexor tendon repair had been
essentially empirical, in that both the time and graduation of the
exercise regimen have lacked clear conceptual guidelines. The
magnitude of load applied in previous studies had not been clearly
controlled, and similarly, the effects of increased repair site
excursion and gap formation had not been evaluated in clinically
relevant models. Recent experimental in vivo data on the
application of force and excursion as independent variables by
the authors and other investigators have helped to clarify the
respective roles of these two variables. The goal of surgical
treatment of intrasynovial flexor tendon lacerations is the
achievement of a primary tendon repair of tensile strength
sufficient to allow early controlled motion after surgery. The
implementation of an appropriate postoperative rehabilitation
protocol will, based on the experimental data discussed in this
article, decrease the formation of intrasynovial adhesions, facilitate
the restoration of the gliding surface, and stimulate the accrual of
strength at the repair site.
J HAND THER. 2005;18:8085.
81
SUMMARY
Based on presently available experimental and
clinical data, we conclude that primary repair of
a intrasynovial flexor tendon laceration65 using
a modern multistrand core and epitendinous suture
AprilJune 2005
83
REFERENCES
1. Kessler I, Nissim F. Primary repair without immobilization of
flexor tendon division within the digital sheath. An experimental and clinical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1969;40:587601.
2. Verdan C. Primary repair of flexor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg
Am. 1960;42:64757.
3. Gelberman RH, Manske PR, Akeson WH, Woo SL, Lundborg
G, Amiel D. Flexor tendon repair. J Orthop Res. 1986;4:11928.
4. Lundborg G. Experimental flexor tendon healing without
adhesion formationa new concept of tendon nutrition and
intrinsic healing mechanisms. A preliminary report. Hand.
1976;8:2358.
5. Lundborg G, Rank F. Experimental intrinsic healing of flexor
tendons based upon synovial fluid nutrition. J Hand Surg
[Am]. 1978;3:2131.
6. Lundborg G, Rank F. Tendon healing: intrinsic mechanisms.
In: Hunter J, Schneider L, Mackin E (eds). Tendon Surgery in
the Hand. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1987, pp 5460.
7. Matthews P, Richards H. Factors in the adherence of flexor
tendon after repair: an experimental study in the rabbit. J Bone
Joint Surg Br. 1976;56:61825.
8. Gelberman RH, Amifl D, Gonsalves M, Woo S, Akeson WH.
The influence of protected passive mobilization on the healing
of flexor tendons: a biochemical and microangiographic study.
Hand. 1981;13:1208.
9. Gelberman RH, Woo SL, Lothringer K, Akeson WH, Amiel D.
Effects of early intermittent passive mobilization on healing
canine flexor tendons. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1982;7:1705.
10. Woo SL, Gelberman RH, Cobb NG, Amiel D, Lothringer K,
Akeson WH. The importance of controlled passive mobilization on flexor tendon healing. A biomechanical study. Acta
Orthop Scand. 1981;52:61522.
11. Duran R, Houser R, Coleman C, Postlewaite D. A preliminary
report in the use of controlled passive motion following flexor
tendon repair in zones II and III (abstract). J Hand Surg. 1976;
1:79.
12. Duran RJ, Houser RG. Controlled passive motion following
flexor tendon repair in zones 2 and 3. In: AAOS Symposium on
Tendon Surgery in the Hand. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1975, pp
10514.
13. Lister GD, Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E. Primary flexor
tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization.
J Hand Surg [Am]. 1977;2:44151.
14. Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E, Stormo A. Primary repair of
flexor tendons. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973;4:86576.
84
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56. Silfverskiold KL, May EJ, Tornvall AH. Gap formation during
controlled motion after flexor tendon repair in zone II:
a prospective clinical study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;17:
53946.
57. Gelberman RH, Boyer MI, Brodt MD, Winters SC, Silva MJ. The
effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and
excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental
study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:97582.
58. Harwood FL, Goomer RS, Gelberman RH, Silva MJ, Amiel D.
Regulation of alpha(v)beta3 and alpha5beta1 integrin receptors by basic fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived
growth factor-BB in intrasynovial flexor tendon cells. Wound
Repair Regen. 1999;7:3818.
59. Harwood FL, Monosov AZ, Goomer RS, et al. Integrin
expression is upregulated during early healing in a canine
intrasynovial flexor tendon repair and controlled passive
motion model. Connect Tissue Res. 1998;39:30916.
60. Boyer MI, Watson JT, Lou J, Manske PR, Gelberman RH, Cai
SR. Quantitative variation in vascular endothelial growth
factor mRNA expression during early flexor tendon healing:
an investigation in a canine model. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:
86972.
61. Bidder M, Towler DA, Gelberman RH, Boyer MI. Expression
of mRNA for vascular endothelial growth factor at the repair
site of healing canine flexor tendon. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:
24752.
62. Boyer MI, Gelberman RH, Burns ME, Dinopoulos H, Hofem R,
Silva MJ. Intrasynovial flexor tendon repair. An experimental
study comparing low and high levels of in vivo force during
rehabilitation in canines. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:8919.
63. Silva MJ, Brodt MD, Boyer MI, et al. Effects of increased in vivo
excursion on digital range of motion and tendon strength
following flexor tendon repair. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:77783.
64. Zhao C, Amadio PC, Momose T, Couvreur P, Zobitz ME, An
KN. Effect of synergistic wrist motion on adhesion formation
after repair of partial flexor digitorum profundus tendon
lacerations in a canine model in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2002;84:7884.
65. Gelberman RH, Siegel DB, Woo SL, Amiel D, Takai S, Lee D.
Healing of digital flexor tendons: importance of the interval
from injury to repair. A biomechanical, biochemical, and
morphological study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:
6675.
66. Silva MJ, Boyer MI, Gelberman RH. Recent progress in flexor
tendon healing. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7:50814.
AprilJune 2005
85