Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Porphyry Cu Mo Au and related epithermal
Au deposits are intrusion centered, and are formed
at 4 and 1 km depth, respectively, by fluids
exsolved from magmas emplaced at ~510 km
depth in the upper crust (Sillitoe and Hedenquist, 2003). The majority of known deposits are
genetically related to intermediate to felsic calcalkaline magmas in volcanoplutonic arcs above
active subduction zones (Fig. 1A). They are thus
directly linked to the petrogenesis of arc magmas, and derive their fundamental characteristics
(e.g., relatively high oxidation state and enrichments in alkalies, S, Cl, H2O, and some metals)
from subduction processes. Arc magmas are
predominantly formed by partial melting of the
metasomatized wedge of asthenospheric mantle
between the downgoing oceanic and overriding
oceanic or continental plates (Ringwood, 1977).
These basaltic magmas evolve and interact with
the upper plate lithosphere as they ascend to
form hybrid andesitic magmas characterized
by relatively high oxidation states (typically ~2
log f O2 units higher than the fayalite-magnetitequartz buffer) and high water contents (4 wt%
H2O) (as reviewed in Richards, 2003). These
two characteristics are critical to the formation of magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits
(Candela, 1992): the high oxidation state suppresses the formation of significant amounts of
magmatic sulfide phases, which would strip the
magma of chalcophile and siderophile metals
(e.g., Fe, Cu, Au, Mo; Hamlyn et al., 1985;
*E-mail: Jeremy.Richards@ualberta.ca.
2009 The Geological Society of America. For permission to copy, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, or editing@geosociety.org.
GEOLOGY,
March
2009
Geology,
March
2009;
v. 37; no. 3; p. 247250; doi: 10.1130/G25451A.1; 2 figures.
247
Figure 1. A: Porphyry Cu
generation as a product of
normal arc magmatism;
continental arc is shown,
but similar processes can
occur in mature island
arcs. MASHmelting, assimilation, storage, and
homogenization. SCLM
subcontinental lithospheric mantle. BD:
Remelting of subductionmetasomatized SCLM or
lower crustal hydrous
cumulate zones (black
layer) leading to potential porphyry Cu-Au and
epithermal Au deposit
formation. B: Collisional
lithospheric thickening.
C: Postcollisional lithospheric mantle delamination. D: Postsubduction
lithospheric extension.
High Sr/Y and La/Yb magmas may be generated in
all cases by residual or
fractionating hornblende
(garnet, titanite) in the
lower crust.
248
Figure 2. Concentrations
of Cu and Au in silicate
magma as function of R =
(mass of silicate melt)/
(mass of sulfide melt)
(Campbell and Naldrett,
1979). Cu-rich magmas
can form at relatively low
R factors (R = 102105),
but leave a relatively
Au-rich sulfide residue.
Remelting of this sulfide
residue (R 105) during
second-stage melting
events can generate relatively Au-rich magmas.
oxidizing but S-rich conditions of arc magmatism), these sulfide phases will be enriched
in Au and other highly siderophile elements.
During second-stage postsubduction magmatism, these small volumes of sulfide will
remelt, releasing their metal contents to the
alkaline silicate magma. Late-stage partitioning of these metals into hydrothermal fluids
exsolved during cooling and crystallization of
this magma at upper crustal levels generates
magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits superficially similar to arc-related porphyry and epithermal deposits, but more enriched in Au and
of generally lower sulfidation state.
Thus, regions of postsubduction magmatism, which may have been overlooked by mineral exploration strategies in the past, have the
potential to host significant Au-rich porphyry
and epithermal deposits.
CONCLUSIONS
Postsubduction magmatism resulting from
lithospheric thickening, thermal rebound, mantle
lithosphere delamination, or lithospheric extension shares many geochemical and isotopic
characteristics with subduction-related calcalkaline magmatism, but tends to be more alkaline (shoshonitic, hawaiitic), less sulfur rich,
and more isolated in distribution and timing.
Such magmas are derived by remelting of the
metasomatized roots of former arc magmatic
systems, from which they inherit their arc geochemical signature and metal endowment.
Porphyry- and epithermal-style mineral
deposits associated with postsubduction magmatism are Au rich relative to many arc-related
deposits, a characteristic that may reflect
remelting of small amounts of residual sulfide
left in the deep lithosphere by arc magmatism.
Because of their sparsity (under the relatively
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a Discovery Grant
from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada. I thank S. DeBari, A. Greene,
and R. Sillitoe for helpful advice, and J. Hedenquist,
G. Yogodzinski, C. Macpherson, and A. Tomkins for
constructive reviews.
REFERENCES CITED
Campbell, I.H., and Naldrett, A.J., 1979, The influence of silicate:sulfide ratios on the geochemistry of magmatic sulfides: Economic Geology
and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic
Geologists, v. 74, p. 15031506.
Candela, P.A., 1992, Controls on ore metal ratios in
granite-related ore systems: An experimental
and computational approach: Royal Society of
Edinburgh Transactions, Earth Sciences, v. 83,
p. 317326.
Candela, P.A., and Holland, H.D., 1984, The partitioning of copper and molybdenum between
silicate melts and aqueous fluids: Geochimica
et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 48, p. 373380, doi:
10.1016/00167037(84)902576.
249
250
elements as deduced from MORB: Implications for partial melting: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 54, p. 33793389, doi:
10.1016/00167037(90)90292-S.
Pearce, J.A., Bender, J.F., De Long, S.E., Kidd,
W.S.F., Low, P.J., Gner, Y., Saroglu, F.,
Yilmaz, Y., Moorbath, S., and Mitchell, J.G.,
1990, Genesis of collision volcanism in eastern
Anatolia, Turkey: Journal of Volcanology and
Geothermal Research, v. 44, p. 189229, doi:
10.1016/03770273(90)90018-B.
Richards, J.P., 1995, Alkalic-type epithermal gold
depositsA review, in Thompson, J.F.H., ed.,
Magmas, fluids, and ore deposits: Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series
23, p. 367400.
Richards, J.P., 2003, Tectono-magmatic precursors
for porphyry Cu-(Mo-Au) deposit formation: Economic Geology and the Bulletin of
the Society of Economic Geologists, v. 96,
p. 15151533.
Richards, J.P., 2005, Cumulative factors in the generation of giant calc-alkaline porphyry Cu
deposits, in Porter, T.M., ed., Super porphyry
copper and gold deposits: A global perspective:
Volume 1: Linden Park, South Australia, Porter
Geoscience Consulting Publishing, p. 725.
Richards, J.P., Chappell, B.W., and McCulloch,
M.T., 1990, Intraplate-type magmatism in a
continentisland-arc collision zone: Porgera
intrusive complex, Papua New Guinea: Geology, v. 18, p. 958961, doi: 10.1130/0091761
3(1990)018<0958:ITMIAC>2.3.CO;2.
Richards, J.P., Wilkinson, D., and Ullrich, T., 2006,
Geology of the Sari Gunay epithermal gold deposit, northwest Iran: Economic Geology and
the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists, v. 101, p. 14551496.
Ringwood, A.E., 1977, Petrogenesis in island arc
systems, in Talwani, M., and Pitman, W.C.,
eds., Island arcs, deep sea trenches, and back
arc basins: American Geophysical Union
Maurice Ewing Series I, p. 311324.
Sillitoe, R.H., and Hedenquist, J.W., 2003, Linkages
between volcanotectonic settings, ore-fluid
compositions, and epithermal precious metal
deposits, in Simmons, S.F., and Graham, I.,
eds., Volcanic, geothermal, and ore-forming
fluids: Rulers and witnesses of processes
within the Earth: Society of Economic Geologists Special Publication 10, p. 315343.
Solomon, M., 1990, Subduction, arc reversal, and
the origin of porphyry copper-gold deposits in
island arcs: Geology, v. 18, p. 630633, doi:
10.1130/00917613(1990)018<0630:SARATO>
2.3.CO;2.
Tarkian, M., and Stribrny, B., 1999, Platinum-group
elements in porphyry copper deposits: A reconnaissance study: Mineralogy and Petrology,
v. 65, p. 161183.
Wang, Q., McDermott, F., Xu, J., Bellon, H., and
Zhu, Y., 2005, Cenozoic K-rich adakitic volcanic rocks in the Hohxil area, northern Tibet:
Lower-crustal melting in an intracontinental setting: Geology, v. 33, p. 465468, doi: 10.1130/
G21522.1.
Manuscript received 18 August 2008
Revised manuscript received 28 October 2008
Manuscript accepted 30 October 2008
Printed in USA
Geology
Postsubduction porphyry Cu-Au and epithermal Au deposits: Products of
remelting of subduction-modified lithosphere
Jeremy P. Richards
Geology 2009;37;247-250
doi: 10.1130/G25451A.1
Subscribe
Permission request
Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of
their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further
requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent
works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms
to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post
the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting
includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the
presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race,
citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect
official positions of the Society.
Notes