Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCIENCE
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY
POLS6005B
International Security
Lecturer:
Jonathan Monten
Office Hours:
Teaching:
Credits:
Assessment:
Two essays
Essay Deadlines:
TBA
Attendance:
USEFUL LINKS
Lecture and Seminar Times:
Online Timetable at www.ucl.ac.uk/timetable
Essay Submission Information
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/intranet/ug/assessment/essays
Extenuating Circumstances
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/intranet/ug/assessment/extenuatingcircumstances
Penalties for Late Submission and Overlength Essays
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/intranet/ug/assessment/essays
Essay Writing, Plagiarism and TurnItIn
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/intranet/ug/assessment/essays
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/current-students/guidelines/plagiarism
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Library/CitationPlagiarism.doc
Overview
This module examines major debates in the field of international security. Many important
issues in international politics relate to the use or threat of military force and political
violence, and the insecurity this threat poses to states, communities, and individuals. This
module is organized into two parts. The first part will introduce students to key questions in
the field of international security and the theoretical and empirical approaches scholars use to
answer them, such as the causes of war, whether democracies are more peaceful than
autocracies, and how international norms and institutions shape the behavior of states. The
second part will examine a number of contemporary international security issues, including
nuclear proliferation, civil conflict and terrorism, military intervention, and shifts in the global
balance of power. Particular focus will be given to the research methods and empirical
strategies commonly used by scholars in the field.
Module Objectives
By the end of the module, students will:
Understand the major theoretical debates and empirical approaches used in the study
of international security;
Learn to critically evaluate competing theoretical and empirical claims about
important international security problems;
Apply diverse theoretical and empirical tools to understand and evaluate debates over
international security policy;
Develop a more conceptually and empirically informed understanding of the current
international security environment;
Become better consumers and producers of scholarly research in international
politics.
Week 2: Realism
Required Readings:
Morgenthau, Hans. 2013. Six Principles of Political Realism. In Robert Jervis and
Robert Art, eds., International Politics. New York: Pearson, pp. 14-22.
Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W.
Norton. Chapters 1-2.
Jervis, Robert. 2013. Offense, Defense, and the Security Dilemma. In Robert Jervis
and Robert Art, eds., International Politics. New York: Pearson, pp. 90-110.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York:
Columbia University Press, 1959.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.
Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. Review: The Balance of Power in the Balance. World
Politics 61(2): 330-359.
Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization
49(3): 379-414.
Schelling, Thomas. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chapter 2
Art, Robert. 2002. Coercive Diplomacy: What Do We Know? In Robert Art and
Patrick Cronin, eds., The United States and Coercive Diplomacy. Washington, DC:
United States Institute of Peace Press.
Nye, Joseph. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York:
Public Affairs. Chapter 1.
Supplementary Readings:
Frieden, Jeffrey A., David A. Lake, Kenneth A. Schultz. 2013. World Politics:
Interests, Interactions, Institutions. New York: W.W. Norton.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and
Political Change. International Organization 52(4): 887-917.
Mearsheimer, John. 1994/95. The False Promise of International Institutions.
International Security 19(3): 5-49.
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity
in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy
Networks in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desch, Michael C. 1998. Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in
Security Studies. International Security 23(1): 141-170.
Carpenter, R. Charlie. 2011. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and
the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization 65(1): 69102.
Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative
Basis for Nuclear Non-Use. International Organization 53(3): 433-468.
Russett, Bruce. 1999. Why Democratic Peace? In Michael E. Brown, Sean M. LynnJones, and Steven E. Miller, eds., Debating the Democratic Peace. Cambridge, MA.:
MIT Press, pp. 82-115.
Sebastian Rosato. 2003. The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory. American
Political Science Review 97(4): 585-602.
Snyder, Jack, and Erica D. Borghard. 2011. The Cost of Empty Threats: A Penny Not
a Pound. American Political Science Review 105(3): 437-456.
Supplementary Readings:
Lipson, Charles. 2005. Reliable Partners: How Democracies Have Made a Separate
Peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Russett, Bruce, and John Oneal. 2000. Triangulating Peace: Democracy,
Interdependence and International Organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Reiter, Dan, and Alan C. Stam. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy &
Public Affairs 12(3): 205-235.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. 1995. Democratization and the Danger of
War. International Security 20(1): 5-38.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M. Siverson, and
Alastair Smith. 1999. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.
American Political Science Review 93(4): 791807.
Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of
International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88(3): 577592.
Weeks, Jessica L. 2012. Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the
Initiation of International Conflict. American Political Science Review 106(2): 326
347.
Supplementary Readings:
Pape, Robert. 2003. The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. American Political
Science Review 97(3): 343-361.
Kalyvas, Stathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Stedman, Stephen John. 1997. Spoiler Problems in the Peace Process. International
Security 22(2): 5-53.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 2004. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford
Economic Papers 56(4): 563-595.
Walter, Barbara F. 1997. The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement. International
Organization 51(3): 335-64.
Sagan, Scott D. 1996/1997. Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in
Search of a Bomb. International Security 21(3): 54-86.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2003. More May Be Better. In Scott D. Sagan and Kenneth N.
Waltz, eds., The Spread of Nuclear Weapons. New York: W.W. Norton. Chapter 1.
Sagan, Scott D. 2003. More Will be Worse. In Scott D. Sagan and Kenneth N. Waltz,
eds., The Spread of Nuclear Weapons. New York: W.W. Norton. Chapter 2.
Supplementary Readings:
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2012. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb. Foreign Affairs
(July/August).
Gavin, Francis J. 2009/10. Same As It Ever Was: Nuclear Alarmism, Proliferation,
and the Cold War. International Security 34(3): 737.
Supplementary Readings:
Mearsheimer, John. 2006. Chinas Unpeaceful Rise. Current History (April): 160162.
Ikenberry, John. 2008. The Rise of China and the Future of the West. Foreign Affairs
(January/February).
Friedberg, Aaron. 2005. The Future of U.S. China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?
International Security 30(2): 7-45.
Supplementary Readings:
Gilpin, Robert. 1983. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Kennedy, Paul. 1989. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Vintage.
Wohlforth, William. 1999. The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security
24(1): 541.
Beckley, Michael. 2011/12. Chinas Century: Why Americas Edge Will Endure.
International Security 36(3): 41-78.
Monteiro, Nuno P., and Debs, Alexandre. 2014. Known Unknowns: Power Shifts,
Uncertainty, and War. International Organization 68(1): 1-31.
Christensen, Thomas J. 2001.Posing Problems without Catching Up: China's Rise and
Challenges for U.S. Security Policy. International Security 25(4): 5-40.
U.S. National Intelligence Council. 2012. Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds
(Executive Summary).