Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
MSLQMot 0.56
0**
MSLQLS
MSLQTotal
SILLDirect
SILLIndirt
0.84
9**
0.94
3**
0.27
0
0.42
4**
0.41
0**
0.320
*
0.431
**
0.436
**
0.798
**
0.3
10
*
0.4
55
**
0.4
50
**
0.9
33
**
0.9
21
**
Motivation
Page 20
Drnyei
Z.
and
Skehan
P.,
(2003),Individual difference in second
language learning, in Handbook
of
Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty
and M. Long, Eds., pp. 589 630, Blackwell,
Oxford, UK.
Drnyei
Z.,(2001),
Teaching
and
Researching
Motivation,
Pearson
Education, Harlow, UK.
Duncan T. G. and McKeachie W. J.,(2005),
The making of the motivated strategies for
learning
questionnaire,
Educational
Psychologist, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 117128.
Ellis R.,(1994), The Study of Second
Language, Oxford University, New York,
NY, USA.
Eshel Y. and Kohavi R.,(2003), Perceived
classroom control, self-regulated learning
strategies, and academic achievement,
Educational Psychology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp.
249260.
Gardner R. C., Tremblay P. F.,(1997), and A.
M. Masgoret, Towards a full model of
second language learning: an empirical
investigation, The Modern Language
Journal, vol. 81, pp. 344362.
Goh C. C. M., (1998), How ESL learners
with different listening abilities use
comprehension strategies and tactics,
Language Teaching Research, vol. 2, no. 2,
pp. 124147.
Griffiths C.,(2004), Language learning
strategies: theory and research, Research
paper
series,
http://www.crie.org.nz/research_paper/c
_griffiths_op1.pdf.
Griffiths C.,(2003), Patterns of language
learning strategy use, System, vol. 31, no.
3, pp. 367383.
Harklau L., Losey K., and Siegal M.,
Eds.,(1999), Generation 1.5 Meets College
Composition: Issues in the Teaching of
Writing to U.S.-Educated Learners of ESL,
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah,
NJ, USA.
Vol. 2, Issue 1, March 2012
in
Page 22
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.