You are on page 1of 4

This article was downloaded by: [HINARI]

On: 26 April 2015, At: 09:16


Publisher: Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954
Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,
UK

Journal of Broadcasting &


Electronic Media
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hbem20

Agenda Setting in a 2.0


World: New Agendas in
Communication
a

Guy J. Golan
a

S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at


Syracuse University
Published online: 10 Sep 2014.

Click for updates


To cite this article: Guy J. Golan (2014) Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas
in Communication, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58:3, 476-477, DOI:
10.1080/08838151.2014.935946
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.935946

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE


Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the Content) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,
or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with
primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,

and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or


indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.

Downloaded by [HINARI] at 09:16 26 April 2015

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New


Agendas in Communication
Guy J. Golan

Downloaded by [HINARI] at 09:16 26 April 2015

Johnson, T. J. (2013). Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas in


Communication. New York, NY: Routledge. 289 pages.

Four decades of agenda setting scholarship have yielded hundreds of empirical


studies that tested and supported the transfer of issue salience from the media
to the public agenda as predicted by the original McCombs and Shaw (1972)
study. Over the years, agenda setting scholarship evolved into five main areas
of investigation: the original hypothesis, attribute agenda setting, its contingent
conditions, the sources of the media agenda, and its consequences (McCombs,
2005). Recently, some scholars have argued that the diffusion of online and social
media platforms may necessitate a reexamination of the basic nature of agenda
setting in the modern era.
Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World, edited by University of Texas professor Thomas
Johnson, includes a dozen chapters written by a relatively new generation of agenda
setting researchers, including widely published scholars such as Sebastian Valenzuela, Sharon Meraz, and Matthew Ragas. As noted by the editor, the content of
the book was gathered from a 2011 agenda setting conference that was held at the
University of Texas in honor of Professor Max McCombs.
The rationale for the book is to provide a much needed examination of the agenda
setting process in response to the new media environment that potentially reshaped
the mediaaudience relationship. As noted by Johnson in the introduction and later
by Tran (chapter 10), there is a growing body of literature that examines agenda
setting and the Internet. Several of the contributors argued for the need to examine
the influence of social media and the Internet on the agenda setting process along
with the modern online media ecology.
As noted by Johnson, the book focuses on six different areas including social
media and Web sites, the contingent conditions of agenda setting, agenda setting
Guy J. Golan (Ph.D., University of Florida) is associate professor in the S.I. Newhouse School of Public
Communications at Syracuse University. His research focuses on international and political communications.
2014 Broadcast Education Association
DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2014.935946

Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 58(3), 2014, pp. 476477


ISSN: 0883-8151 print/1550-6878 online

476

Downloaded by [HINARI] at 09:16 26 April 2015

Golan/BOOK REVIEW: AGENDA SETTING IN A 2.0 WORLD 477

outside of political communications, the different levels of agenda setting, issue


salience, and behavioral consequences. As such, most book chapters have little in
common with one another beyond the inclusion of the agenda setting concept and
the Internet case studies. Collectively, the book lacks a comprehensive theoretical
focus. This key limitation is common to many edited volumes in the field of mass
communication.
Regardless, I found the research outlined in the book to be interesting. For example, building upon his previous scholarship, Valenzuelas chapter provides an
important discussion of the psychological processes that impact the transfer of
salience between the news media and the public agenda.
Additionally, Lei Guos chapter discusses the so-called third-level of agenda
setting. Based on a network analysis perspective, the chapter identifies a combined
object-attribute saliency transfer to the public agenda that differs from the linear first
and second level saliency transfer model. Adding to a limited number of published
studies on the third-level of agenda setting, Guos chapter provides an important
contribution to theory building in the field.
As the field of agenda setting research moves ahead, scholars must tackle some of
its key limitations. Trans chapter provides an important discussion of the suggested
causation (the transfer of issue salience from the media to the public agenda) based
on simple correlational tests. The authors call for time-series and experimental
design was well argued and supported by his review of existing literature. Missing
from the book (with the exception of Guos chapter) was an in-depth discussion of
the potential use of network analysis as a key method for agenda setting research
in a 2.0 media landscape.
Overall, Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World provides a fresh discussion of significant
research issues and opportunities that face modern agenda setting scholarship. This
book is recommended to graduate students who would like to explore the various
facets of agenda setting research and to mass communication scholars at large.

References
McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies,
6, 543557.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public
Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176187.