Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Also, 69 percent of districts that receive Reading First giants called the program’s assessments important or very
important, and 68 percenl made the same classification for the program’s instructional component.
,,Private
........- S p ellin ~t__ s, Mar ~1, aret
From: McLane, Katherine
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 4:36 PM
To: Private - Spellings, Margaret; Landers, Angela; Evers, Bill; Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia;
DDrfman, Cynthia; Mesecar, Doug; Dunckel, Denise; Dunn, David; Pitts, Elizabeth; Flowers,
Sarah; McGrath, John; Talbert, Kent; Briggs, Kerri; Kuzmich, Holly; Toomey, Liam; Maddox,
Lauren; Scheessele, Marc: PrivaLe - Spellings, Margaret; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Beaton,
Meredith; Moran, Robert; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Tada, Wendy; Halaska, Terreli; Tracy WH;
Wurman, Ze’ev; Young, Tracy; Quades, Karen; Bannerman, Kristin; Watkins, Tiffany:
Sampson, Vincent
Ditto, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Weekly Standard on Reading First
Evaluation Indicates Limited Effects Under Early Reading First Program (EDWEEK)
By’ Kathleen Kennedy Manzo
Education Week, June 13, 2007
The federal effort to bolster emergent literacy skills has yielded some improvement in preschoolers’ knowledge of letters
and understanding of prir~t concepts, but has had little effect on other skills deemed critical precursors to reading, an evaluation
released last week by the Institute of Education Sciences concludes.
-Ihe final repod on the Eady Reading First program, conducted by outside researchers under contract to the research arm
of the U.S. Department of Education, found the program has had the most significant effect in improving classroom activilies and
materials, as wel! as teacher practices related to literacy development.
Teachers in padicipating classrooms received far more professional development, mentoring, and tutoring on literacy and
curriculum topics than their counterparts in nonfunded classrooms, as much as 48 more hours per year, the study found.
Children in Early Reading First classes had higher-quality interactions with teachers, greater access to literacy-building activities,
more early-wriling exercises, and regular screening and assessment of their skills.
But the program appeared Io have no effect on 1he preschoolers’ oral-language skills, social or emotional development, or
phonological processing-awareness of the sounds that make up words.
Some experts say the results show that while Early Reading First is beneficial for improving the field, they raise questions
about why the program did not appear to impact some of the central areas it targeted.
"We don’t think we should abandon Early Reading First .... but we need to think about what we have to do to change it for
betler outcomes and better professional-development oppodunities," said Adele Robinson, Ihe associate executive director for
policy and public affairs f~r the Washington-based National Asso¢ia%n for the Education o~ Young Children.
Under the Early Reading Firsl initiative, which was aulhodzed under the No Child Left Behind Act, about 150 local
education agencies and public and private early-childhood programs have shared some $450 million in federal grants since 2002
for improving school readiness among disadvantaged preschool children. Grants ranged from $750,000 to $4.5 mi[ien over three
years.
The evaluation looked at child-outcome data and teacher practices in 28 of the 30 sites that received the three-year grant in
fiscal 2003, and compared the results with those at 37 sites that had applied for but did not get funding. Potenlial Conflicts
Outlined
The report is the first from the tES to include a disclosure of potential conflicts of interest among contractors involved in
such evaluations. In this case, it outlines the role of a subcontractor arid consultant in the evaluation, and their connections Io
assessments used to gauge the program’s progress.
The institule has always required contractors to disclose professional and financial ties that might conflict with their role in
such evaluations, But IES officials decided to publish such disclosures as a result of reports by the Education Department’s
inspector general and subsequent congressional hearings that highlighted potential conflicts of interest in the federal Reading
First program, according to IES Director Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst.
Vol. 26, Issue 41, Page !2
,,Pf!vate - Spellin~ls, Margaret
From: Reich, Heidi
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:56 AM
To: Beaton, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Bryant, Jessica; Cariello, Dennis; Colby, Chad; Ditto, Trey;
Dorfman, Cynthia; Dunckel, Denise; Dunn, David; Evers, Bill; Flowers, Sarah; Gate, Cassio;
Gribble, Emily; Halaska, Terrell; Herr, John; Higgins, Kristan; Kuzmich, Holly; Lambert, Kelly;
Landers, Angela; MacGuidwin, Katie; Maddox, Lauren; Maguire, Tory; McGrath, John;
McLane, Katherine; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Mesecar, Doug; Mo~n, Robert; Morf-ri, Jessica;
Neate, Rebecca; O’Daniel, Meagan; Pitts, Elizabeth; Pdvate - Spellings, Margaret; Reich,
Heidi; Rosenfelt, Phil; Ruberg, Casey; Scheessele, Marc; Tada, Wendy; Talbert, Kent; Terrell,
Julie; Toomey, Liarn; Tucke[, Sara Martinez; Williams, Cynthia; Young, Tracy; Young, Tracy
D. ; Yudof, Samara; Zeff, Ken
Subject: House Panel Votes To Slash ’Reading First’ Aid (EDWEEK)
Indeed, she recently attended a taping of American ldo! and last fall made history as the first silting Cabinet secretary to
appear on Jeopardy. She also became the first education secreta6f to lose on Jeopardy. She lost to actor Michael
McKean, best known as Lenny on the old Laverne and Shirley television show. The loss provided ample fodder for her
detractors_
Ms. Spellings says she agreed to do The Daily Show several monks ago at the urging of her two daughters. It just
happened to come at an awkward time for her department. Congress is investigating conflict-of-interest complaints
involving the federal student loan program and the Bush administration’s Reading First program.
You know those loans that students increasingly need in order to pay for college? When choosing a lender, many students
rely on the "preferred" status lisl offered by their college or university. Now federal and state regulators say some of the
lenders in 1he $85 billion industry earned their preferred status thanks to kickbacks that they offered to the schools.
Reading First, a key $1 billion-a-year reading program in President Bush’s 2002 No Child Left Behind education reform, is
alleged to have given preferential treatment to materials favored by top advisers who also had their own reading textbooks
or tests to sell. Much of this happened before Ms. Spellings took over in early 2005, but congressional critics are accusing
her of failing to take action to investigate and clear up the alleged conflicts.
Such a difference a Democratic-controlled Congress makes. Were it not for the Bush administration’~ bigger headline-
making headaches over the Bring of U.S. attorneys, Ms. Spellings’ department might well be getting a lot more attention
these days.
The irony of the Reading First controversy is that, regardless of the allegations, reading scores for students in the program
have dramatically improved. The percentage of first-graders who met or exceeded proficiency standards on reading
fluency grew from 43 percent to 57 percent in a study of 2004 to 2006, and third-graders who improved grew from 35
percent to 43 percent.
Ms_ Spellings’ role as a communicator- getting the information out about successes - actually is more important in many
ways than her credentials as an educator. She acknowledged in a congressional hearing that she lacks an education
degree. She has a bachelor’s degree in political science and journalism from lhe University of Houston, and her only
formal classroom experience was as an unce~tified substitute teacher in Texas.
But, as she showed in our interview and on The Dally Show. she speaks up fomefully for a large group that too often feels
shortchanged in school debates: the parents.
I laid on her my biggest complaint aboul standardized tests: Doesn’t every child learn differently?
"Yes, but I think sometimes that’s used as an excuse for masking underachievement."
Then she got personal: "1’11 tell you what, Clarence .... I’ve yet to meet a parent who didn’t want their kid to be reading at
anylhing less than grade level - this year! Not in 2014 [the goal year set by the administration for closing that academic
achievement gaps]. This year! And that’s not an unreasonable expectation for parents to have of their schools and their
kids."
Many parents have learned the hard way what President Bush means when he speaks of "the soft bigotry of low
expectations," especially l’or minority students. Many schools and teachers perform magnificently, but too often the system
rewards mediocre teachers and, in effect, punishes those who are willing to put extra effort into their job. The Bush
administration’s pay incentives for high-performing teachers and principals move in the right direction.
I’m still skeptical of emphasizing tests too much. But we all need to set goals in life, and we need good yardsticks for
progress. That’s as good a lesson as any for Margaret Spellings to teach. No joke,
Clarence Page is a Chicago Tribune columnist. His e-mail address is cpage@ tribune.com.
U,S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings visited Cary Academy on Friday as part of a national tour leading up to the
expected reauthorization of the federal No Child Left Behind Act later this year. Here are excerpts of her interview with staff
writer Marti Maguire. To hear more, go online to www.newsobserver.com.
Q: What made you choose to come here, a private school?
A: [Cary Academy] is a true laboratory of innovation, particularly in the use of technology. They feet part of their mission is
to help develop practices that can be shared and used not only here but in the public sector as well ....These divisions
between private and public schools are really blurring.
Q: You spoke today with school officials about the importance of math, science, technology and engineering education.
But North Carolina schools are facing a severe shortage of qualified math and science teachers, particularly in more rural
areas. What can be done about that?
A: We can use technology, of course, to expand and broaden the flow of expertise so that a teacher here at Cary Academy
might be partnering with a rural school district and, through technology, getting additional teaching hetp more broadly
expanded. The other thing we can do is to start to use resources in our communities beyond just the traditional teaching
core. You have many fine universities in this state. Why don’t we find ways for those folks to come into our public schools?
Q: North Carolina students have shown essentially no improvement on state tests since the first year No Child Left Behind
act went into effect. How can NCLB deliver on its promise of closing the achievement gap?
A: One of the things that’s been so impodant about NCLB is that we have brought real data to bear about the status of our
schools. Who’s being left behind? Who isn’t? Where are the schools that are challenging what the president calls the "soft
bigotry of low expectations"? Going back to the ostrich approach of burying our heads in the sand, putting the money out
and hoping for the best is the wrong direction. Obviously, we need to pick up the pace. We need to confront those facts,
But when I look at the North Carolina data, in some very key ways, we are really making progress. We’re making progress
in the white-black achievement gap in reading in grades three and four and six and seven. North Carolina is one of the
~eaders on Advanced Placemenl, realty double the national average on the opportunity that kids have to take rigorous
coursework.
Q: I saw you on "Jeopardy!" when you bst to Michael McKean, the actor who played Lenny on "Laverne and Shirley."
A: That was his third time on the show, not to be bitter. And it’s all about the buzzer.
More than half of them received a 600, the highest score possible.
Miles away in Chesapeake, the same thing happened at Southeastern Elementary School: 56 percent of the third-graders
aced the test. And across the state, 1 in 5 students did.
Perfect scores were far less common in other subjects, such as math and English. In science, fewer than 6 percent of
students taking the tests in the state earned the highest score.
Educators said students’ success in history showed how well Virginia’s standards are being taught and learned. Others
wondered whether the tests are too easy.
"The obvious question," said Steve Dunbar, an education professor at the University of Iowa, "is, Are kids in third grade in
Virginia really better in social studies than anything else?"
When the Standards of Learning exams were designed in the late 1990s, little thought was given to how many students
should be acing them.
In the traditional bell curve - what statisticians call a "normal distribution" of scores - most students would be in the middle
of the range. About 2.5 percent would receive the highest mark.
But Virginia’s standardized tests are not graded on a curve. They’re supposed to gauge how well students know the
Standards of Learning, and the hope is that as many students as t~ossible are proficient.
"The more kids who are getting the perfect score, the better," said Doris Redfield, an education consultant who headed the
Virginia Department of Education’s assessment and reporting division in the late 199Os.
Before the SOLs are given, a scale is set that links each possible number of correct answers to a score. The scale
changes slightly each year when I:est questions change.
A 600 means the student missed either zero, one or two questions, depending on the test. On the elementary science
tests last year, students needed to be perfect. On the history tests, they could miss one or two.
While 600s sound impressive, principals, administrators and state officials are most concerned with pass rates - the
percentage of students scoring 400 orabove. Pass rates are important in determining whether a school is accredited by
the state and whether it meets academic goals under the federal No Child Left Behind law.
The Virginia Department of Education doesn’t routinely report the actual scores received on the SOL tests. At the request
of The Virginian-Pilot, officials released the number of 600s on all SOL tests in 2005-06 and the scores of all lests taken by
third- and fifth-graders in South Hampton Roads.
Usually when a series of tests is developed, the scoring patterns tend to be the same from subject to subject, said the
University of Iowa’s Dunbar.
The number of Virginia students who passed history and science was similar, with the rates each at about 90 percent for
third-graders and at about 85 percent for fifth-graders.
But the difference in the number of perfect scores was much more pronounced. So was the variation in students scoring
"pesstadvanced" - a 500 or above. In third grade, 57 percent earned that score on history compared with 40 percent for
science; in fifth grade, it was 45 percent for history and 23 percent for science.
There are two disadvantages when lots of students earn the highest score on a test. Teachers can’t determine the finer
details or what students haven’t learned, and there’s no room left to improve.
"If you’re getting kids who are close to the ceiling or hitting the ceiling, they have nowhere to go," said Bruce Bracken, an
education professor at The College o! William and Mary.
In the early years, scores were so low in several grade levels that in 2001 the Virginia Board of Education took the unusual
step of lowering the number ef questions that students needed to answer correctly to pass some of the tests. That
included the fifth-grade exam.
"The one thing we’ve always heard is lhe history tests are too hard," said Charles Pyle, a spokesman for the Virginia
Department of Education.
The tesls were based on standards from 1995, which required elementary students to know the basics of economics,
geograph),, civics and history. Before, they had started out learning about family and community, then eased into state,
national and world history.
Teachers felt that the SOL tests covered too much ground in one year and that the standards were unclear.
When the state’s history and social science standards came up for a seven-year review in 2001, committees consisting
mostly of teachers recommended a rewdte of the curriculum. Among their suggestions: pare back the information covered.
By 2003-04, the entire test had been changed to meet those new standards.
Historically, scores have dropped in the first year or so of new or revised tests.
But that year, the percentage of perfect scores in third-grade history jumped to 16 percent from 2.6 percent. For fifth-
graders, the number increased to 9 percent from 2.4 percent.
State officials say that doesn’t mean the tests are too easy.
"There were some legitimate concerns that had to be addressed about the teachability of the standards," Pyle said. "Our
history and social studies teachers are finding that the 2001 standards are teachable. They’re rigorous, but they’re
teachable."
The new tests feature more clear-cut questions and more illustrations, some teachers said. The answer options for the
multiple-choice tests often include at least one that seems implausible.
"The tests were meant to be broad strokes of the general knowledge instead of just these individual details," Costis said.
"Not, ’Do you remember a little, minute detail of first grade, second quarter?’"
Educators said the large number of high scores last year could be due to the age of the test.
"Once the test has been out for a while, you have years and years to perfect what you do- with the instruction, with the
strategies, just equipping the students with the knowledge," said Patricia S. Williams, principal of Westhaven Elementary in
Portsmouth.
At Dreamkeepers, Principal Doreatha White has score improvement down to a science-.-She identifies which concept
tripped up her students the most in each subject area and has her teachers include lessons on that concept every week.
In history, this yeaCs concept is geography. Maps of the world in glitter, paint and colored pencil line the hallways, and
students inside the classrooms constantly drill the names of oceans and continents.
"We don’t wait until January to start test preparation," White said. "We start in September."
In nine years, the elementary-leve! science SOL tests have never been significantly revised.
Elementary students don’t seem to have trouble passing the exams, yet the percentage of perfect scores statewide has
remained relatively low: 5.4 percent for third graders last year and 2.3 percent for fifth graders.
Why is it harder for students to ace this test?
It could be the type of questions. Science tends to require problem-solving rather than fact memorization.
In an example from last year’s exam, third-graders were given four pictures of animals on a seesaw and asked, "Which ol~
these shows that the toy cow is lighter than the toy horse?"
Fifth-graders were shown four pictures and asked which depicted the type of cloud that would most likely be seen during a
thunderstorm.
"They have to know the concept, and they have to be able to apply it," said Ashanda Bickham, a teacher at Norro]k’s
Chesterfield Academy of Math, Science and Technology. "It’s a higher level o1: thinking."
Some teachers, such as Bickham, must also figure out how to relay science concepts to students who have weak reading
skills.
She solved the problem by chucking the thick textbooks. Instead, she uses work sheets from a prepared curriculum to
help students create an "interactive notebook."
The children paste paragraphs and pictures into a spiral notebook in which they also write notes and draw pictures.
Bickham walks the students through the texts, asking increasingly difficull: questions.
Said fourth-grader Lytaja Brown, ’%ou get to draw what it’s about, and it stays in your head."
More hands-on activities and lessons that promote inquiry will help students improve in scienoe, said Paula Klonowski, a
science specialist with the Virginia Department of Education.
The most common complaint from elementary teachers is they don’t have enough time in their schedules to teach science
effectively, Klonowski said.
Costis, at Dreamkeepers Academy, said science lessolls require more supervision from teauhers and often can’t be
interrupted.
"To have enough time to set up and put down a full-blown science experiment," she said, "you’re kind of up a creek."
Additionally, teacher training programs sometimes give short shrift to science, said Veronica Haynes, Norfolk’s senior
coordinator for the subject.
"1 think they’re afraid of science," she said, "and all the hands-on that comes with doing science education."
Virginia’s standards in US. history and world history have been rated highly by the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, a
Washington think tank.
Standards aren’t necessarily linked to test scores, though. In Georgia, another state with solid ratings, 120,166 third-
graders took the state’s standardized social studies test last year, and just 43 received the highest mark.
Virginia has the chance to revise the history and social science guidelines - and possibly change the tests - this year, as
they come up for review again. The science standards, which also drew praise from the Fordham Foundation, are up for
review in 2010.
Pyle said the history and social science standards are unlikely to change a lot, given the overhaul in 2001.
Mark Emblidge, president of the state Board of Education, said scores are one of many factors considered when
standards are reviewed. Ultimately, he said, the goal is for all students to pass. But high achiever~ also should have
something substantial to strive for.
Despite the focus on pass rates, some educators are now encouraging students lo shoot for scores higher than 400.
One Southeastern Elementary teacher has a "500 club," and Costis tells her high-achieving students that "pass/advanced
is for sissies."
For 600 scores, some schools offer rewards including trophies, boomboxes and passes to Busch Gardens.
The ever-rising scores put increasing pressure on teachers and administrators, who are often expected to show
improvement each year. But parents and children say scoring a 600 is like racking up bonus points: good for bragging
rights but not much else.
"1 didn’t tell any of my friends," said Edward Grant, a Dreamkeepers fourth-grader who scored a 600 or~ the history test last
year. ’1 was just talking about it in my head. I was so happy."
STAMFORD - Last week’s visit by federal Education Secretary Margaret Spellings drew new attention to an old, and
festering, issue: the evaluation of school districts based on a test some students have trouble reading.
The federal No Child Left Behind act requires testing or all students, including those who are still ]earning English, to hold
school districts accountable for students’ progress. It’s a sore spot for urban districts such as Stamford, which absorb a
of immigrants.
With the landmark education law up for reauthorization in Washington, Connecticut officials and educators are pressing for
changes to the testing rules, calling them unfair because of the sanctions the law places on districts that don’t measure up.
"The test results of these students have an impact on the schools’ ability to make adequate yearly progress (under No
Chifd Left Behind), so you want to make sure it’s done fairly, and it’s an accurate measure," said Bob Murphy, policy
director for the Connecticut Education Association, an organization representing teachers.
Stamford Schools Superintendent Joshua Starr said "it hurts our standings" and called it one of many problems with the
law.
Stamford’s immigranL students had varied reacLions to the Connecticut Academic Performance Test, used to measure
schools’ compliance with the law, a few weeks after taking the teet in early March.
Marco Bravo, a Stamford High School sophomore, immigrated 16 months ago from Mexico and understood about half the
words on lhe test, he said.
Another Stamford High sophomore, Karen Chaguay, said she understood most of it but thinks she failed the reading test.
"it’s frustrating, because you want to do well," said Karen, who came to the United States from Ecuador a little over a year
ago.
Dominican Republic native Eliana Lithgow, also of Stamford High, didn’t have much trouble. But she said she heard a
different story from other immigrant students.
"I heard them say it was really difficult to them," she said.
Some accommodations are provided. Some students, for instance, were allowed to use dictionaries that translated words
but did not give a definition. They also were given extra time to take the tests.
Stamford is a diverse district with an above-average number of students needing help with English.
Thirty-five percent or Stamford studenls spoke a language other than English at home in the 2005-06 school year,
compared with 13 percent statewide, state data show. Two thousand Stamford students -t~of about 15,000 -I~are classified
as English-language learners, said Judith Singer, research director for Stamford public schools.
When students fall short under federally required tests, schools must take corrective measures, such as allowing students
to transfer to better-performing schools within the district. Management changes also could be required.
Schools can fail federal standards because of the performance of English-language learners or other student subgroups.
Nearly all of Stamford’s public schools have fallen short to varying degrees under NCLB.
In Connecticut, high schoolers are tested on math, science, reading and writing under the Connecticut Academic
Performance Test; grade school and middle school students lake the Connecticut Mastery Test, with sections on math,
6
reading and writing.
Immigranl students have one school year before their scores must be reported to the federal government for evaluating
their schools. All must be initially assessed on their English skills, said "lom Murphy, spokesman for the Connecticut
Department of Education.
Spellings, appearing Tuesday in Stamford at a round-table discussion with business, educational and community leaders,
said the federal government offers help to states in testing Englishqanguage learners.
"There is flexibility there, and I would invite the good people of Connecticut to take us up on some of that," she said in an
interview.
More than 20 states have entered partnerships with the federal government that give them other options, she said, States
may use tests in. students’ native languages, or alternalive assessments such as work samples or portfolios.
State and local educators have other ideas. Murphy said it would be difficult for Connecticut *l~a small state with small
budgets, compared with other statesl~-l~to develop tests in all the languages spoken here. More than 140 languages are
spoken in Connecticut schools, he said.
"Certainly the preponderance of non-English-speaking students speak Spanish, but that is not the only large group,"
Murphy said.
Stamford students speak 57 languages. The top three are English, Haitian Creole and Spanish, but there are blocks of
students speaking other ~anguages. Polish is spoken by 202 students; 93 speak Albanian; 109 speak Russian; and 96
speak Bengali, district data shaw.
Murphy said the department favors giving districts three years, not just one, before they are evaluated on English-language
learners’ test results. Students need time -I~seven years, some research shows!~-~to acquire the more formal English
used in tests, and many have trouble learning English because they have limited skills in their native language, he said.
A U.S. Education Department offici~al disputed the idea of a three-year wait, saying it would defeat NCLB’s purpose of
making student achievement transparent.
"These students are in the country now. They’re part of the school system, and they have the ability to Iearn, and we
should use this data for better instruction," department spokesman Chad Colby said.
"The school district can learn from this data to improve instruction," he said.
He provided an editorial, written by Spellings, calling it a myth that most English-language learners are new arrivals to the
United States and are disadvantaged. Eighty percent have lived here at least five years, she wrote. Reading scores for
English-language learners nationally grew by 20 points from 2000 to 2005, she wrote.
Singer praised the law for displaying all students’ achievement levels and making sure they don’t fall through the cracks.
But she supported one change - letting English-language learners continue to be classified that way after meeting federal
standards. Students now leave that category once they are considered proficient.
With a change, she said, "the evaluation of that group would have half a chance to show progress and success."
5. Let children be children; Is your 5.year-old stressed out because so much is expected?
Penelope H. Bevan
June 3, 2007
I was watching one of my second-grade girls try unsuccessfully to tie her shoes the other day, and I thought, "This is a
person who is supposed to be learning plural possessives?" I think not.
We’ve just finished test time again in the schools of California. The mad frenzy of testing infects everyone from second
grade through high school. Because of the rigors and threats of No Child Left Behind, schools are desperate to increase
their scores. As the requiremer~ts become more stringent, we have completely lost sight of the children taking these tests.
For 30 years as a teacher of primanj kids, I have operated on the Any Fool Can See principle. And any fool can see that
the spread between what is developmentally appropriate for 7- and 8-year-old children and what is demanded of them on
these tests is widening. A lot of what used to be in the first-grade curriculum is now taught in kindergarten, Is your 5-year-
old stressed out? Perhaps this is why.
Primary-grade chitdren have only the most tenuous grasp on how the world works. Having been alive only seven or eight
years, they have not figured out that in California there is a definite wet and dry season, They live in high expectation that it
will snow in the Bay Area in the winter. They reasonably conclude, based on their limited experience with words, that a
thesaurus must be a dinosaur. When asked to name some of the planets after he heard the word Earth, one of my boys
confidently replied, "Mars, Saturn, Mercury, Jupiter and Canada!" to which a girl replied. "No, no, no, you gotta go way far
outer than that."
Research has shown that it takes approximately 24 repetitions of a new concept to imprint on a young brain. The
aforementioned plural possessives come up twice in the curriculum, yet they are supposed to know it when they see it.
This is folly.
Currently, 2 1/2 uninterrupted hours are supposed to be devoted 1~ language arts and reading every morning. I ask you,
what aduit could sustain an interest in one subject for that long? Yet the two reading series adopted by the state for
elementary" education require that much time be devoted to reading in the expectation that the scores will shoot up
eventually. Show me a 7-year-old who has that kind of concentration. Show me a 64-year-old teacher who has it. Not f.
The result of this has been a decline in math scores at our school, because ~he emphasis is on getting them to read and
there isn’t enough time to fit in a proper curriculum. Early math education should rely heavily on messing about with
concrete materials of measurements, mass, volume and length, and discovering basic principles through play.
There is no time for this. The teaching ol= art is all but a subversive activity. Teachers whisper, "I taught art today!" as if they
would be reported to the Reading Police for stealing time from the reading curriculum, which is what they did.
It is also First Communion time in second grade. Yes, I teach in a public school, but First Communion happens in second
grade, and it is a big deal, the subject of mucll discussion in the classroom. The children are excited.
A few months back one of my girls exclaimed, "Jeez, l have a lot I~ do after school today, Teacher. I gotta do my
homework, go to baseball practice and get baptized." I laughed to myself at the priorities of this little to-do list, so symbolic
ol= the life of one second-grader. But there was a much larger issue here. What is happening to their souls? You may ask,
what business it is of the schools what is happening to the souls of these little children?
f will tell you. Any foot can see that those setting the standards for testing of primary-grade children haven’t been around
any actual children in a long time. The difference belween what one can reasonably expect an 8-year-old to know and
what is merely a party trick grows exponentially on these state tests.
Meanwhile, children who know they are bright and can read well are proved wrong time and again because of the structure
of these tests. Teachers spend inordinate amounts of time trying to teach the children to be careful of the quirky tricks of
the tests when they should be simply teaching how to get on in the world.
Twenty years ago, I had a conferencewilh a parent, a Sikh, whose child was brilliant. I was prepared to show him all her
academic work, but he brushed it aside and said, "Yes, yes, I know she is quite smart, but I want to know how her soul is
developing."
The present emphasis on testing and lest scores is sucking the soul out of the primary school experience for both
teachers and children, So much time is spent on testing and measuring reading speed that the children are losing the joy
that comes but once in their lifetime, the happy messiness of paint, clay, Tinkertoys and jumping rope, the quiet discovery
of a shiny new book of interest to lhem, the wonders of a magnifying glass. The teachers around them, under constant
pressure to raise those test scores, radiate urgency and pressure. Their smiles are gdm. They are not enjoying their jobs.
Our children need parents and teachers who, like Hamlet, know a hawk from a hand saw, who know foolishness when
they see it and are strong enough to defend these small souls from the onslaught of escalating developmentally
inappropriate claptrap. The great unspoken secret of primary school is that a lot of what is going on is arrant nonsense,
and it’s getting worse. Any foot can see.
Rebecca Neale
U.S. Department of Education
Deputy Press Secretary
Office. 9n~_~n.~.n.~~4
Cell: ~
rebecca.neale@ed.gov
WEEKEND NEWS SUMMARY
June 3, 2007
tt was the day before she would appear on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, M~ose host
is a known liberal critic of the Bush administration. But in an interview in her office,
Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings put a happy face on it.
Indeed, she recently attended a taping of Anaerican Idol and last fall made history as the
first sitting CaNnel secretm., to appear on Jeopardy. She also became the first education
secretary to lose on Jeopardy. She lost to actor Michael McKean, best know~ as Lenny
on the oId Laveme and Shirley television show. The loss provided ample fodder for her
detractors.
Ms. Spellings says she agreed to do The Daily Show several months ago at the urging of
her two daughters. It just happened to come at an awkward time for her department.
Congress is investigating conflict-of-interest complaints involving the !~deral student
loan program and the Bush administration’s Reading First program.
You know those loans ~ha~ students increasingly need in order to pay for college? When
choosing a lender, many students rely on the "preferred" status list oflbrcd by their
college or universiD’. Now federal mad state regulators say some of the lenders in the $85
bilIion indust~, earned their prefcn’ed status thanks to kickbacks that they offered to the
schools.
Reading First, a key $l billion-a-year reading program in President Bush’s 2002 No Child
Left Behind education reform, is alleged to have given preferential treatment to materials
favored by top advisers who also had their own reading textbooks or tests to sel!. Much
of this happened before Ms. Spellings took over in early 2005, but congressional critics
are accusing her of failing to take action to investigate and clear up lhe alleged conflicts.
Such a difference a Democratic-controlIed Congress makes. Were it not for the Bush
administration’s bigger headline-making headaches over the firing of U.S: attorneys, Ms.
Spellings’ department might well be getting a lot more attention these days.
The irony of the Reading First controversy is that, regardless of the allegalions, reading
scores for students in the program have dramatically improved. The percentage of first-
graders who met or exceeded proficiency standards on reading ttuency grew from 43
percent to 57 percent in a study of 2004 to 2006, and third-graders who improved grew
from 35 percent to 43 percent.
Ms. Spellings’ role as a communicator - getting the information out about successes -
actually is more important in mm~y ways than her credentials as an educator. She
acknowledged in a congressionaI hearing that she. lacks an education degree. She has a
bachelor’s degree in political science and journalism from the University of Houston, and
her only formal classroom experience was as an uncertified substitute teacher in Texas.
But, as she showed in our interview and on The Daily Show, she speaks up forcefully for
a large group that too often feels shortchanged in school debates: the parents.
I laid on her my biggest complaint about standardized tests: Doesn’t every child learn
differently?
"Yes, but I think sometimes that’s used as an excuse tbr masking underachievement."
Then she got personal: "I’ll tell you what, Clarence .... I’ve yet to meet a parem who didn’t
want their kid to be reading at anything less than grade level - this year! Not in 20t4 [the
goal year set by the administration for cloNng that academic achievement gaps]. This
year! And that’s not an unreasonable expectation for parents to have of their schools and
their kids."
Many parents have learned the hard way what President Bush means when he speaks of
"lhe sotl bigotry of low expectations," especially for minority students. Many schools mad
teachers perform magnifieenlty, but too often the system rewards mediocre leachers and,
in effect, punishes those who are willing to put extra effort into their job. The Bush
administration’s pay incentives for high-perforating teachers and principals move in the
right direction.
l’m still skeptical of emphaNzing tests too much. But we all need to set goals in life, and
we need good yardsticks for progress. That’s as good a lesson as any tbr Margare!
Spellings to teach. No joke.
U.S. Secretary. of Education Margaret Spellings visited Car3..’ Academy on Friday as part
of a national tour leading up to the expected reauthorization of the federal No Child Left
Behind Act later this year. IIere are excerpts of her interview with staff writer Marti
Maguire. To hear more, go ratline to www.newsobserve~.com.
Q: What made you choose to come here, a private school?
Q: You spoke today wilh school officials about the importm~ce of math, science,
leclmology mid engineering education. But North Carolina schools are facing a severe
shortage of qualified math mad science teachers, particularly in more rural areas. What
can be done about that?
A: We can use tec.lmology, of course, to expand and broaden the flow of experlise so that
a teacher here at Cary Academy might be partnering with a rural school district and,
through technology, getting additional teaching help more broadly expanded. The other
thing we can do is to start to use resources in our communities beyond just the traditional
teaching core. You have many fine universities in this state. Why don’t we find ways for
those folks to come into our public schools?
Q: North Carolina students have shown essentially no improvement on state tests since
the first year No Child Left Behind act went into effect. How can NCLB deliver on its
promise of closing the adaievemenl gap?
A: One of the things that’s been so important about NCLB is that we have brought red
data to bear about the status of our schools. Who’s being left behind? Who isn’t? Where
are the schools that are challenging what the president calls the "soft bigotry of low
expectations"? Going back to the ostrich approach of buoing our heads in the sand,
putting the money oat and hoping for the best is the wrong direction. Obviously, we need
to pick up the pace. We need to confront those facts. But when I look at the North
Carolina data., in some ",,cry key ways, we are really making progress. We’re making
progress in the white-black achievement gap in reading in grades three and four and six
and seven. North Carolina is one of the leaders on Advanced Placement, really double the
national average on the opportunity" that kids have to take rigorous coursewoa’k.
Q: I saw you on "Jeopardy[" when you Ios1 to Michael MeKcan, the actor who played
Letmy on "Laveme and Shirley."
A: That was his tl~ird time on the show, not to be bitter, kind it’s all about the buzzer.
3. Why are so man)’ students acing some SOL tests?
The Virginian-Pilot
June 3, 2007
By Amy Jetler
Last spring, 50 third-graders took the history Standards of Learning exam at Norfolk’s
Dreamkeepers Academy at J.J. Roberts Elementary School.
More than half of them received a 600, the highest score possible,
Miles away in Chesapeake, the same thing happeaaed at Southeastern Elementary School:
56 percent of the third-graders aced the test. And across the state, 1 in 5 students did.
Perfect scores were I~ar less common in other subjects, such as mafia and English. In
science, fewer thm~ 6 percent of students taking the tests in the state earned the highest
score.
Educators said students’ success in history showed how well Virginia’s standards are
being taught and learned. Others wondered whether the tests are too easy.
"The obvious question," said Steve Dunbar, an education protEssor at the UniveJ’sity of
lowa, "is, Are kids in third grade in Virginia really better in social studies than anything
else?"
When the Standards of Learning exams ~vere designed in the late 1990s, little thought
was given to how many students should be acing them.
In the traditional bell cur~’e - what statisticians call a "normal distribution" of scores -
most students would be in the middle of the range. About 2.5 percent would receive the
highest mark.
But Virginia’s standardized tests axe not graded on a cm’e. They’re supposed to gauge
how well students know the Standm’ds of Learning, and the lmpe is that as many students
as possible are proficient.
"The more kids who are getting the perfect score, the better," said Doris Redfield, an
education eonm~ltant who headed the Virginia Department of Education’s assessment and
reporting division in the late ] 990s.
Before the SOI.s are given, a scale is set thal links each possible number of correct
answers to a score. The scale changes slightly each year when test questions change,
A 600 means the student missed either zero, one or two questions, depending on the test.
On the elemental" science tests last year, students needed to be perfect. On the histoD’
tests, they could miss one or two.
While 600s sound impressive, principals, administrators and state officials are most
concerned with pass rates - the percemage of students scoring 400 or above. Pass rates
are important in determining whether a school is accredited by the state and whether it
meels academic goals under the fedeial No Child Left Behind law.
The Virginia Department of Education doesn’t routinely report the actual scores received
on the SOL tests. At the request of The Virginian-Pilot, officiaIs released the number of
600s on all SOL tests in 2005-06 and the scores of all tests taken by third- and fifth-
graders in South Hampton Roads.
Usually when a series of tests is developed~ the scoring patterns tend to be the same from
subject to subject, said the University of Iowa’s Dunbar.
The number of Virginia ~tudents who passed history and science was similar, with the
rates each at about 90 percent for third-graders and a~ abo~t 85 percent for fifth-~nders.
But the difference in the number of perker sco,es was much more pronotmced. So was
the variation in students scoring "pass/advanced" - a 500 m above. In thi,d grade, 57
percent earned that score on history compared with 40 percent for science; in fifth grade,
it xvas 45 percent for history and 23 percent for science.
There are two disadvantages when lois of students earn the highest score on a lest.
Teachers can’t determine the finer details of what students haven’t learned, and there’s no
room left to improve.
"If you’re getling kids who are close to the ceiling or hitting the ceiling, they ha~¢e
nowhere to go," said Bruce Bracken, an education professor at The College of Willi,’m~
and Mar),.
In the early years, scores were so low in several grade levels that in 2001 the Virginia
Board of Education took the unusual step of lowering the number of questions that
smdenls needed to answer correctly to pass some of the tests. That included the fifth-
grade exam.
"The one thing we’ve "always heard is the histor)’ tesls are too hard," said Charles Pyte, a
spokesman for the Virginia Department of Education.
The tests were based on standards from 1995, which required elementary studenls to
know the basics of economics, geography, civics and history. Before, they had started out
learning about family and community, then eased into state, national and world history.
Teachers tElt that the SOL tests covered too much gromad in one year ,’rod thal the
standards were unclear.
When the stae’s histo~- and social science standm’ds came np for a seven-year review in
200 I, committees consisting mostly of teachers recommended a revwite of the
cunieulum. Amortg their suggestions: pm’e back the information covered,
By 2003-04, the entire test had been changed to meet those new standards.
Historically, scores have dropped in the first year or so of~tew or revised tests.
But that year, the percentage of perfect Scoles in third-grade hislory jtm~ped to 16 percent
from 2.6 percent. For fifth-graders, the nnmber increased to 9 percent from 2.4 percent.
State officials say that d0esffl mean the tests are too easy.
"Thexe were some legitimate concerns thai had to be addressed about the teachability of
the standards," Pyle said. "Our histo~’ and social studies teachers are finding that the
2001 standards are teachable. They’re rigorous, but they’re teachable."
The new tests feature more clear-cut questions and more illustralions, some teachers said,
The answer options for the multiple-choice tests often inck~de at least one that seems
implausible.
"The tests were meant to be broad strokes of the general knowledge instead ofjus~ these
individual details," Cc~stis said. "Not, ’Do you remember a little, minute detail of first
grade, second quarter?’ "
Educators said the large numbe~" of high scores last year could be due to the age of the
test,
"Once the test has been out for a while, you have years and years to perfect what you do -
with the instruction, with the strategies, just equipping the students with the knowledge,"
said Patricia S. Williams, pri~cipal of Westhaven Elementary-in Portsmouth.
In histo~’, this year’s concept is geography. Maps of the world in glitter, paint m~d
colored pencil line the hallways, and students inside the classrooms constantly drill the
names of oceans and continents.
"We don’t wait until January to start test preparation," White said. "We start in
September."
In nine years, the clementaiT-level science SOL tests have never been significantly
revised.
Elementary students don’t seem to have trouble passing the cxmns, yet the percentage of
perfect scores statewide has remained relatively low: 5,4 percent for third graders last
year and 2.3 percent for fifth graders.
It could be the type of questions. Science tends to reqlfire problem-solving rather than
fact memorization.
In an example from last year’s exam, third-graders were given four pictures of animals on
a seesaw and asked, "Which of these shows that the toy cow is lighter than the toy
horse?"
Fifth-graders were shown four pictures and asked which depicted the lype of cloud that
would most likely be seen during a ~hundexstonn.
"They have to know ~he concept, and they have to be able to apply it," said Ashanda
Bick.harn, a teacher at Norfolk’s Chesterfield Academy of Math, Science and Technology.
"It’s a higher level of thinking."
Some teachers, such as Bickham, must also figure otR how tO r¢|ay science concepts to
students who have weak reading skills.
She solved the problem by chucking the thick textbooks. Instcad, she uses work sheets
from a prepared curriculum to help students create an "interactive notebook."
The children paste paragraphs and pictures into a spiral nolebook in which they also write
notes and draw pictures. Bic "kham walks the students through the texts, asking
increasin~y difficult questions.
Said fourth-grader Lytaja Brovm, "You get to draw what it’s about, and it stays in your
head."
More hands-on activities and lessom that promote inquiry will help students improve in
science, said Paula Klonowski, a science specialist with the Virginia Department of
Education.
Costis, at Dreamkeepers Academy, said science lessons require more supervision from
teachers and often can’t be interrupled.
"To have enough time to set up and put down a full-blown science experiment," she said,
"you’re kind of up a creek."
Additionally, teacher training programs sometimes give short shrilt to science, said
Veronica Haynes, Norfolk’s senior coordinator for the subject.
"I think they’re afraid of science," she said, "and all the hands-on that comes with doing
science education."
Virginia’s standards in U.S. histoD" and world history have been rated highly by the
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, a Washington think lank.
Standards aren’t necessarily linked to test scores, though. In Oeorgia, another state with
solid ratings, 120,166 third-graders took the state’s standardized social studies test last
year,, and just 43 received the highest mark.
Virginia has the chance to revise the history and social science guidelines - and possibly
change the tests - this year, as they come up for review again. The science standards,
which also drew praise from the Fordham Foundation, are up for review in 2010.
Pyle said the history., and social science standards are unlikeIy to change a lot, given lhe
overhaul in 2001.
Mark Emblidge, president of lhe state Bom’d of Education, said scores are one of many
factors considered when standards are reviewed. Ullimately,. lm said, the goal is tbr all
studenls to pass. But I~igh achievers also should have something substantial to strive tbr.
Despite the focus on pass rates, some educators am now encouraging students to shoot
for scores higher than 400.
One Southeastern Elementary teacher has a "500 club," and Costis tells her high-
achieving students that "pass/advanced is tbr sissies."
For 600 scores, some schools offer rewards including trophies, boomboxes and passes to
Busch Gardens.
The ever-rising scores put increasing pressure on leather’s and administrators, who are
often expected to show improvement each year. But parents and children say scoring a
600 is like racking up bonus points: good lbr bragging righ*s bnt not much else.
"I didn’t tell any of my friends," said Edward Grant, a Drean&eepers tburth-~ader
scoa’ed a 600 on the history test last year. "I was just talking about it in nay head. I was so
happy."
STAMFORD - Last week’s ~’isit by t)deral Educatiort Secretary Margaret Spellings drew
new atlenlion to an old, and festering, issue: the evaluation of school distriels based on a
test some students have trouble reading.
The federal No Child Left Behind act requires testing of all students, including those who
are still learning English, to hold school districts accountable for students’ progress. It’s a
sore spot for urban districts such as Stamford, which absorb a lot of immigrants.
"The test results of these students have an impact on the schools’ ability to make adequate
yearly progress (under No Child Left Beh.ind), so you ,,,.,ant to make sure it’s done faMy,
and it’s an accurate measure," said Bob Murphy, policy director for the Connecticut
Education Association, an organization representing ~eaehers.
Stamford Schools Superintendent Joshua Start said "it hurts our standings" and called it
one of many problems with the law.
Marco Bravo, a Stamford High School sophomore,, immigrated 16 months ago from
Mexico and understood about half the words on the test, he said.
Another Stamford High sophomore, Karcn Chaguay, said she undersiood most of it but
thinks she fared the reading test.
"It’s ti-ustrating, because you want to do well," said Karen, who came to the United States
from Ecuador a little o~,er a year ago.
Dominican Republic ~ative Eliana Lithgow, also of Stamford l?tigh, didn’t have much
trouble. But she said she heard a different story from other inm~igrant students.
"I heard them say it was really difficult to them," she said.
Some accommodations are provided. Some students, for instance, were allowed to use
dictionaries that translated words but did not give a definition. They also were given extra
time to take the tests.
Thirty-five percent of Stamford students s~poke a language other lhan English at home in
the 2005-06 school year, compared with t 3 percent statewide, state data show. Two
thousand Slam ford students -Eof about 15,000 -gare classified as English-language
learners, said Judith Singer, research director for Stmnford public schools.
When studenls fall short under federally required tests, schools must take corrective
measu.res, such as allowing students to transfer to better-performing schools within the
district. Management changes also could be required.
In Connecticut, high schoolers are tested on math, science, reading and writing trader the
Com~ecticut Academic Performance Test; grade school and middle school students take
the Commcticut Mastery" Test, with sections on math, reading and writing.
Immigrant students have one school year before their scores must be reported to the
t?deral government for evaluating their schools. All must be initially assessed on their
English skills, said Tom Murphy, spokesman for the Connecticut Department of
Education.
"There is flexibility there, m~d I would invite the good people of Connecticut to take us
up on some of that," she said in an inter~,iew,
More than 20 states have entered partnerships with the tbderal government that give them
other options, she said. States may use tests in students’ native languages, or alternative
assessments such as work samples or portfolios.
State and local educators have other ideas. Mttrphy said it would be difficult for
Connecticut -t~a small state with small budgets, compared with other statesi~-t~to develop
tests in all the languages spoken here. More than 140 languages are spoken in
Connecticut schools, he said.
"Certainly the preponderance of non-English-speaking students speak Sp~isb, but that is
not the only large group," Murphy said.
Stml]ford students speak 57 languages. The top three are English, 11aitian Creole arid
Spanish, but there are blocks of students speaking other langnmges. Polish is spoken by
202 students; 93 speak Albanian; 109 speak Russian; and 96 speak Bengali, district data
show.
Murphy said the department lhvors giving districts three years, not just one, before they
are evaluated on English-lan~gu, age learners’ test results. Students need time -l~.seven
years, some research showsE-Eto acquire the more tbrmal English used in tests, and
many have trouble learning English because they have limited skills in fl~eir native
language, he said.
A U.S. Education Depa_rtment official disputed the idea of a three-year wait, saying it
would defeat NCLB’s purpose of making student achievement transparent.
"These students a~e in the country now. "l;hey’re part of the school system, and they have
the ability to learn, and we should use this data for better instruction," depmvtment
spokesman Chad Colby said.
"The school district can learn from this data to improve insmmtion," he said.
Singer praised the law for displaying all students’ achievement levels and making sure
they don’t fall through the cracks. But she supported one change - letting English-
lm~guage learners continue to be classified that way afte~ meeting t}deral standards.
Students now leave that category once they are considered proficient.
With a change, she said, "the evaluation of that group would bare half a chance to show
progress and success."
I was watching one of my second-grade girls try unsuccessfully to tie her shoes the other
day, and I thought, "This is a person who is supposed to be learning plural possessives?" ]
think not.
We’ve just finished test time again in the schools of California. l-he mad t~enzy of ~osting
infects everyone fiom second grade through lfigh school. Because of the rigors and
tt~reats of No Child Left Behind, schools are despexate to increase their scores. As the
requirements become more stringent, we have completely Io~ sight of the children taking
these tests.
For 30 years as a teacher of primary kids, 1 have operated on the Any Fool Can See
principle. And any fool can see that the spread between what is developmentally
appropriate for 7- and 8-year-old children and what is demanded of them on these tests is
widening, A lot of what used to be in the first-grade curriculum is now taught in
kindergarten. Is your 5-year-old strewed out? Perhaps this is why.
Primary-grade children have only the most tenuous grasp on how the world works.
ttaving been alive only seven or eight years, they have not figured out that in California
lhere is a definite wet and dry season. They live in high expectation that it M]I snow in
lhe Bay Area in the winter. They reasonably conclude, based on their limited experience
~dth words, tl~at a thesaunls must be a dinosaur. When asked to name some of the planets
after he heard the word Earth, one of my boys confidently replied, "Mars, Saturn,
Mercury, Jupiter m~d Canada!" to which a girl replied, "No, no, no, you gotla go way far
outer than thatY
Research has shown that it takes approximately 24 repetitions of a new concept to imprint
on a young brain. The aforementioned plural possessives cr)me up twice in ~he
curricutumo yet they axe supposed to know it when they see it. -fhis is folly.
Currently, 2 1/2 unintem~pted hours are supposed to be devoted to language arts and
reading every morning. I ask yoga, what adult could sustain an interest in one subject for
that long? Yet the two reading series adopted by the state for elementary education
require that much time be devoted to reading in the expectation that the scores will shoot
up eventually. Show me a 7-year-old who has that kind of concentration. Show me a 64-
year-old teacher who has it. Not L
The restflt &this has been a decline in malh scores at our school, because the emphasis is
on getting then~ to read and there isn’t enotlgh time to fit in a proper curriculum. Early
math education should rely heavily on messing about with concrete materials of
measurements, mass, volume and length, and discovering basic principles through play.
There is no time tbr this. The teaching of art is all but a subversive activity. Teachers
whisper, "t taught art today!" as if they would be reported to the Reading Police for
stealing ti~ne from the reading cum’culum, which is what they did.
II is also First Communion time in second grade. Yes, t teact~ in a public school but First
Communion happens in second grade, and it is a big deal. the subject of much discussion
in the classroom. lhe children are excited.
A few months back one of my girls exclaimed, "Jeez, 1 have a lot to do after school
today, Teacher. 1 gotta do my homework, go to baseball practice and get baptized." I
laughed to myself at the priorities of this little to-do list, so symbolic of the life of one
second-grader. But there was a much larger issue here. What is happening to their souls?
You may ask, what business it is of fine schools what is happening to the so, Is of these
little children?
I will tell you. Any fool can see that those setting lhe standards for testing ofprimary-
gade children haven’t been around any actual children in a long time. The difference
between what one can reasonabIy expect an 8-yeaT-otd to know and what is merely a
party trick grows exponentially on these state tests.
Meanwhile, children who -know they are bright and can read well are proved w~-ong time
and again because of the structure of fl~ese |ests. Teachers spend inordinate amounts of
time trying to teach the children to be careN1 of the quirky tricks of the tests when fl~ey
should be simply ~eaching how to get on in the world.
Twenty years ago, I had a conference with a parent, a Sikh, whose child was brillimat, t
was prepared to show him "011 her academic work, but he brushed it aside and said, "Yes,
yes, I know she is quite smart, bu1 1 want to haow how her soul is rex, eloping."
The present emphasis on lesting and test scores is sucking the soul out of the primary
school experience for both teachers and children. So much time is spent on testing and
measuring reading speed that the children are losing the joy that comes but unce in their
lifetime, the happy messiness of paint, clay, Tinker~oys and jumping rope, the quiel
discovery’ of a shiny new book of interest to them, the wonders of a magnifying glass.
The teachers around them, under constant pressure to raise those test scores, radiate
urgency and pressure. Their smiles are grim. They are not enjoying their jobs.
Our childrcrt need parents and teachers who, like tlamlet, know a hawk from a hand saw,
who know foolishness when they see it and are strong enough to defend these small souls
from the onslaught of escalating developmentally inappropriate claptrap. "!he great
unspoken secret of primary school is that a lot of what is going on is arrant nonsense, and
it’s getting worse. ,4my fool can see.
.pri__vate. Spellin~ls, Margaret
From: Reich. Heidi
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:58 AM
To: Beaton, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Bryan~, Jessica; Cariello, Dennis; Colby, Chad; Ditto, Trey;
Dorfman, Cynthia; Dunckel, Denise; Dunn, David; Evers, 8i11; Flowers, Sarah; Gribble, Emily;
Halaska, Terrell; Herr, John; Kuzmich, Holly; Landers, Angola; MacGuidwin, Katie; Maddox,
Lauren; Maguire, Tory; McGrath, John; McLane, Katherine; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Mesecar,
Doug; Moran, Robert; Merit1, Jessica; Neale, Rebecca; Pil:ts, Elizabeth; Reich, Heidi;
Rosenfelt, Phil; Ruberg, Casey; Scheessele, Marc; Private - Spellings, Margaret; Tada,
Wendy; Talbert, Kent; Terrell, Julie; Toomey, Liam; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Williams, Cynthia;
Young, Tracy; Young, Tracy D. ; Yudof, Samara; Zeff, Ken
Subject: Spellings On Stewart
"But, they should send her out to big-time TV more, would help their ease."
eduwonk.com
Thm’sday, May 24, 2007
SpelIings On Stewart
Punchline? She did fine. Didn’t try to "out fanny" Stewart, looked good, and came offweI1, pragmatic and not
ideological. But, no home-nms so Sallie Mac, Reading First, etc._still out there in the same way when she left
the studio as they were when she walkcd in. And this was lower-risk than Jeopardy. So overall effect, negligible.
Bu1~ they should send her out to big-time TV more, would help their case.
_~...r.ivate - Spellin~ts, Mar~laret
From: Reich, Heidi
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:10AM
To: Beaten, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Bryant, Jessica; Cariello, Dennis; Colby, Chad; Ditto, Trey;
Dorfman, Cynthia; Dunckel, Denise; Dunn, David; Evers, Bill; Flowers, Sarah; Gribble, Emily;
Hataska, Terrell; Herr, John; Kuzmich, Holly; Landers, Angola; MacGuidwin, Katie; Maddox,
Lauren; Maguire, Tory; McGrath, John; McLane, Katherine; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Mesecar,
Doug; Moran, Robert; Morffi., Jessica; Neale, Rebecca; Pitts, Elizabeth; Reich, Heidi;
Resenfelt~ Phil; Ruberg, Casey; Scheessele, Marc; Private - Spellings, Margaret; Tada,
Wendy; Talbert, Kent; Terrell, Julie; Toorney, Liam; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Williams, Cynthia;
Young, Tracy; Young, Tracy D. ; Yudof, Samara; Zeff, Ken
Subject: Reading First shadow falls on ed research (Education Daily)
By SAM DILLON
WASHINGTON, May I0 -- With scanda! rattling the $85 billion student loan industry,
Education Secretary Margaret Spellings argued at a House hearing on Thursday that she
lacked legal authority to clamp down on many abuses-.
Ms. Spellings faced pointed questioning at the hearing from Congre~sionai Democrats, who
accused her department of "mismanagement and complacency.
In about zhree hours of testimony before the House education committee, Ms. Spellings
portrayed her department’s oversight of federal lending programs as vigorous, but said
that the world of private lending, which has become increasingly import&nt as college
costs have outstripped federal loan programs, was mostly beyond her regulatory ~uthority.
She told the panel that the entire stodenz loan sys<em needed overhaul, saying, "The
system is redundant, it’s byzantin~ and it’~ broken."
Severa! Democrats, led by Representative George. Miller, questioned her aggressively,
asserting that she had regulatory power and moral influence that she had neglected to
wield to stop loan companies from paying universities or giving gifts, trips, stock and
consulting pa~euts to the university f.{nancial aid officers who guide students toward
l oa:~ s.
Mr. Mill.or, the C~l[fornia Democrat who heads the education con~.ittee, also took up a
separate issue of questionable federal subsidy pa~ents to lenders, He particu±arly
criticized Ms. Spel!ings’s decision to ignore a recommendation of the department’s
inspector general that she recover $278 million in federal subsidy pag~ents improperly
obgained by Nelnet, a lender based in Nebraska. He also said the ,Justice Department was
now reviewin~ the inspector general’s September audit fhst found Nelnet ineligible for
those p~>~ents.
After the hearing, a Justice Department spokesman, Charles Miller, did not contradict
Representative Miller’s assertions, bur said, "We have no ccm.~en: at this time."
Mr. Miller openly dismissed Ms. Spellings’s portrayal of her department’s monitoring of
student lending as robust. He also criticized the department for its oversight of Reading
First, ~ p£ogrem designed to teach poor children to read that has been besieged by reports
of conflicts of i~ze~iest among Education Department consultants.
"When I look at the whole body of eviience that has been amassed abouL both 1.h~. student
loan and Readj.ng F:’...[sl. pr.::graDs, it is clear that -- at a minimum ~ the Education
Dcpartmenz’ s oversight .=af lures have been monumenta!, " he said.
"We cannot fix this broken enterprise by cherry-picking a few narrow issues to address,"
she said. "We must peel back the layers, increase transparency, streamline the entire
system and provide more aid to students.~’
Ms. Spellings said she would convene a meeting of other federal ager~cies that deal with
lending issues, including the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Federal Reserve, to forge a coherent federal response to improper
relationships between iend÷rs and universities.
Lenders have come under scrutiny in recent months as New York’s attorney general, Andrew
M. Cuome, has high.lighted practices of lenders to get on university preferred lender
lists, which stndents rely on in seeking loa:)s.
Mr. Cuom0 on Thursday announced a new agreement with Student Loan Xpress, a student loan
company that engaged in some of the questionable prmctices, and the CIT Group, the
company’s parent. Under the terms of <he new agreement, CIT will pay $3 million to a
national fund f~r educating high school students and nheir parents mbout financial aid.
Yhe company also signed a code of conduct developed by Mr. Cuomo, governing relationships
between colleges and lenders.
The department has also come under scrutiny from Congress for its failure to halt millions
of dollars in subsidy payments to lenders that expl~Jted loopholes to inflate their
eligibility for subsidies on the student loans, including those paid to Nelnet.
Mr, Miller and other la,~akers pressed Ms. Spellings, the lone witness, to expl~in her
decision in January to allow Nelnet, a major contributor to Republican campafgns, to keep
the $278 million. In ~xchange, Nelnet agreed not to bill for nearly $flO0 million in
subsidies it believed it was eligible for.
Ms. Spellings said that she thought the fact that the department had been paying the
subsidies without questJ.on could have put it in legal jeopardy and that Nelnet might have
prevailed in a lawsuit.
"The reason that i settled was that there was a risk of nearly S900 million that this
government was in danger of losing if we lost a lawsuit," Ms. Spellings said.
Mr. Miller declined to answer questions altar £he hearin~ about any Justice Department
action against Neln~t.
The loan company itself hin~ed to investors in a filing with the Securities and Zxchange
Commission earlier this yea~" that the matter might not be closed, saying thee "the company
was informed by the department that a ci<,il artol’ney with :he Department of Justice has
oper~ed a file regarding this issue."
Ben Nicer, a No[net spokesman, said in ..~n interview, "We are fully cooperating with the
Department of Justice and are confident that 7here are no ~rounds fox any action against
Neln~t. "’
Jonathan D. Glarer contributed reporting.
Miller pointed to a 2003 notice from Education Depamnent Inspector Genera! John Higgins’ office
urging the department to take action to curb gift-giving by lenders to colleges or their staffs.
Miller said the depmlment promised that it would keep an eye on such activities, a response he called
inadequate. Spellings countered that the department has done what it could under existing law. "We
monitor these progrmns vigorously," she said.
Cueing also tbund that some college loan el’ricers receiv¢d gifts from lenders to encourage them to steer
borrowers their way.
On Wednesday, the House overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan bil! that would ban gifts from lenders to
schools and impose strict controls on schools that publish approved lender lists to guide students to
certain loan companies.
Spellings called the vote "an important first step in this process."
But she also noted that she a~so was taking steps to push through new regulations to protect against
conflicts of interest. She said proposed regulations would be completed this month and would include a
requirement of at least three lenders on any school’s preferred-lendez list, together with an explanation of
how and why they were chosen. The rules also will spell out what is allowed and what is prohibited w-~th
regard to inducements from lenders to schools, Spellings said.
She said the Education I)epartment has oversight only for loans made through the federal student loan
programs in which the govemrnent guarantees the loans. She said she has no authority over the growing
private student loan industry., in which the government doesn’t make or guarantee the loans.
Spellings announced at the hearing that she was convening the chairs ot" other federal agencies that deal
with banking and lending issues to help her examine the problems in this sector of the student loan
industry.
Four Officials Profited From Publishers, Report Finds By ~it R. Paley Washington Post
Staff Writer Thursday, May IS, 2007; All
Four officials who helped oversee a federal reading program for your’..c, stndents have
pocketed significant sums of money from textbook publishers that profited from the $I
billion-a-y~.ar initiative, .a Democratic congressional report disclosed yesterday.
Congress and the Justice 0apartment a=e examining the initiative, which provides grants
improve reading for ~h±idr~n from kind~rga~z~n through thi,d grad~.
Kennedy’s report ~ocused on how mneh current or former directors of three regional Reading
First technical assistance centers have earned in recent years from
publishers: Douglas Carnine (more than $8~0,000), Edward Kame’enui (more than $750,000},
Joseph Torgesen (mor~ than $50,000) and Sharon Vaughn (more than $1.2 million).
All fo~r denied wrongdoing, and two accused Kennedy of distozting the situation for
political benefit, "The report is inaccurate~ unfair and has no basis in fact," said
Lizette D. Benedi, a~ attorney for Kame’enui, who works for the Education Department as
co~lissioner of the National Center for SpecJai Education Research.
Carnine and Torgesen still run regional Reading First centers. "At no time did anyone from
.the Depart~r.ent of Education or anywhere else tell me that [the eatnings from publishers]
was a problem as long as I gismlosed m.v contracts," Torgesen said.
The four officials were not covered by federal conflicE-of-interest r,~les because they
worked for a contracted company, not the department, ey~erts said.
Kennedy said <he rules should be tightened.
Staff researche~ Meg Smith contributed to this report.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of ..... ~fam: .... Yahoo’ Hail has the best spare protection around htto://mail.vahoo.com
,..F’, riva ~e i_ s pellin ~ls, .~l.ar r~_a re t
From: katherine mclar~e
Sent:. Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:58 AM
To: Oldham, Cheryl; Conklin, Kdstin; Schray, Vickie; Dunckel, Denise; Shaw, Terri; Sampson,
Vincent; Quarfes, Karen; Bannerman, Kristin; scott m. stanzel@who.eop.gov; jeanie_s.
_mamo@who.eop.gov; Manning, James; Beaton, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Ruberg, Casey;
Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia; Dunn, David; Dorfrnan, Cynthia; Evers, Bill; Kuzmich, Holly;
La Force, Hudson; Landers, Angola; MacGuidwin, Katie; Maddox, Lauren; Private - Spellings,
Margaret; McGrath, John; Mesecar, Doug; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; rob Saliterman;
Yudof, Samara; Scheessele, Marc; Halaska, Terrell; Toner, Jana; Mcnitt, Townsend L;
Young, Tracy; DiLto, Trey; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Zeff, Ken
Subject: House Passes Ban on Gifts From Student Lenders (NY’F)
Hay
House Passes Ba.n on Gifts From Student Lenders
By SAM DILLON and JONATHAN D. GI~.~TER
WASHINGTON, May 9 -- The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to ban
gifts and pag-ments by student loan companies to universities, showing bipartisan resolve
to clean up the $85 billion industry.
The vote, 414 to 3, demonstrated how politically potent the issue of paying for college
has become at a time when tuition is steadily rising and millions o[ students depend on
borrowing to finance college.
"With this vot~," said Representative George Miller, the California Democrat who leads the
House education commi<tee, "the House has tak9n a huge step in the right direction to put
a stop to those practices and ~ake s~,~re that the student loan programs operate on the
l~vel, in the best interests of students and families trying to pay for colleg~."
The bill passed a day before Education Secret~ry Margaret Sp~liings was schedul~d to
testify before the House e<~¢aticn oommittee about oversight of the industry.
It comes in the wake of reyel.ations that lenders paid universities money contingent on
student loan volume, gave gifts to the financial aid administrators whom students rely on
to recommend lenders, and hi~ed financial aid officials as paid consultants.
The nation’s four largest student ]enders and at least
22 co!l~ges have already signed on to a code of conduct developed by Attorney General
Andrew ~, C~omo of New York.
Mr. M%ller was joined by the ranking Republican on his committee, Eeprese~tative Howard
Mc~eon of California, in ~remoting the bill. "We’re stepping ~p today for a single,
fundamental reason," Mr. McKeon said before the vote, "to ensure ou~ nationts financial
aid system continues to serve the needs of our sit, dents."
But he also urged that Congress be careful "’not to overreach." The bil!. has bipartisan
support in the Senate, said Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts and
chairman of Lhe education committee.
A senior Educazion Department. official sa~d that the agency was prepared ~o move quickly
to draft ¢egulations to enforce the bill.
Ms. Spellings is expected to face tough questJor, s thursday about the department’s policing
of the ~n<Justry, as well as about enforcement o~ its own inter~al policies on conflicts of
interest after reports tb~t an official with oversight over the student loan database held
stock in a student loan c¢~psny.
Ms. Spellings’s chief of staff, David Dunn, said in an interview rhat the secretary wanted
to "set the record straight" and show that the department had %aken the s:ep$ it could to
regulate l~nders. Ms. S~.ellin,_~s has convened ~ task force that is to make recommendations
by the end of May on how to ~-egulate th~ lists of recommended lenders at university aid
offices
Ms. Spellings is also expected to face questions about the oversight of Reading First, a
program desi~ned to keach poor children to read by third grade. The department’s inspector
general, John P. Higgins, has issued reports finding conflicts of interest, cronyism and
bias in how officials and private consultants operated the pro@ram and award÷d grants.
Mr. Kennedy, in a report, added new detail Wednesd=-y on how four officials contracted by
the education agency to advise states on buying reading matel-ials had lucrative ties with
publishers.
Edward Kame’enI~i, heaJ of the department’s western technica! assistance center in Oregon
from 2002 through May 2005~ earned hundreds of thousands of dollars in royalties from
Pearson/Scott Foresman
2001 to 2006, the report said. It also said that Douglas Carnine, who replaced Dr.
Kame’enui in 2005, also earned royalties -- $168,470 from McGraw-Hil!, Houghton Mifflin
and Pearson last year.
Joseph Torgesen, who advised Eastern states about materials~ and Sharon Vaughn, who
advised Central states, also received thousands of dallars in royalties from educational
publishers while xepresenting the department, the report said.
"We are studying this report to determine if further actions are necessary and will act
aggressively if any wrongdoing is found."
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo[ Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
:p_riv_ate_ - Sp_e_llings, Mar~laret
From; katherine mclane
Sent; Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:37 AM
To: Oldham, Cheryl; Conklin, Kristin; Schray, Vickie; Dunckel, Denise; Shaw, Terri; Sampson,
Vincent; Quarles, Karen; Bannerman, Kristin; sco~ m. stanzel@who.eop.gov; jeanie_s.
mamo@who.eop.gov; Manning, James; Beaton, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Ruberg, Casey;
~,olby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia; Dunn, David; Dorfman, Cynthia; Evers, Bill; Kuzmich, Holly;
La Force, Hudson; Landers, Angela; MacGuidwin, Katie; Maddox, Lauren; Private- Spellings,
Margaret; McGrath, John; Mesecar, Doug; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; rob Satiterman;
Yudof, Samara; Scheessele, Marc; Halaska, Terretl; Toner, Jana; Mcnitt, Townsend L.;
Young, Tracy; Ditto, Trey; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Zeff, Ken
Subject: Exam looms for US education secretary in Congress (Reuters)
Exam looms for US education sec~-etary in Congr-=ss Wed [day 9, 2007 8:02 PM ET
By Kev±n Drawbaugh
WASHINGTON, [Jay 9 (Reuters)- U.S. Education o...~c="~=ra~v.~ Hargaret Spellings, a former Bush
administration policy advisor, will appear before a congressional committee on Thursday
with a scandal sweeping qhrough the college student loar~ business, a key area of oversight
for her agency.
The secretary is expecLed to face tough questions from the House of Representatives
Education and Labor Committee, which has been probing conflicts of interest in an $85
billion industry that plays a crucial role in helping ;~erican students afford the highest
college tuition fees in the ~orld.
Investigators allege that loan firms have given college financial aid officers pay and
perks -- such as stock and gifts to curry favor and win inclusion on so-called "preferred
lender" lists that are shown [o students seeking loans.
The House voted 414-3 on wednesday for a bill that would crack down on s~ch ].~sts; ban
lender gifts to college aid officers; require disclosure of lender-college relationships;
and protect students from aggressive marketing practices.
New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, a leader in the ~;idening conflic<s investigation,
in at. Aoril 25 colombia-tee hearinq said that the Education Department had been- "asl~ep at
Lhe switch" on its oversight of st[ldent loans. He alleged "_hat S~ellings had "defaulted on
her obligations-"
Spellings zeplied at the qime :hat she shared Cuomo’s concerns about lender practices. She
said that she takes her "role as steward of federal financial aid very seriously" and
stressed tha~ she h~d creat~}d ~n internal task force at :he department to work on new
student loan z-equlations.
Brought up in Houston, Spellings worked = r Bush when he was governor of Texas. During her
White House tenure she helped draft the p.-esident’s No Child Left Behind law.
House _d~_a_ un committee spokesman Tom Riley said the hearin~ also will examine the
department’s management cf Reading First, a program that is part of No Chili Left. Behind.
"What we have seen in the studen: loan scandal and in Reading First is that, at a minimum,
the Depar.m..n.- of Education has faJ].ed in ~ts oversight, Ki!ev said
"~hat w.e want to learn tomorrow is why these fai.].u[es were allowed to happen and what
sceps will be taken to make sure they won’t happen again," he said.
Paying for college is a big business in ~erica and is profitable for financial
institutions like Citigroup <C.N>, JPMorgan Chase <JPM.N> and Bank of :nm~erica <BAC.N>, as
well as specialist companies such as Sallie Mac <SLM.N>.
Most students who take out loans get hhem from banks or from Saliie Mac, either with n
federal guarantee backing them or, increasJ.ngly, without one. Loans also are available
directly from the government and from other sources.
Student debt has risen recently, as tuition has outpaced inflation and grant aid has
failed to keep up. A t2~ica! undergraduate leaves school today owing about $20,000.
Congressional Democrats -- including House Education Committee Chairman George Miller of
California and Senate Education Committee Chairman Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts --
support far-reaching reforms for student loans that directly threaten the business models
of Sallie Mac acd the banks.
Critics of the loan industry charge it makes unfair profits at the expense of students,
while lenders say that their loans are cost-effioient and that they provide valuable
financial services to both students and the universinies they attend.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http:/imail.yahoo.com
From: McLane, Katherine
Sent: Wednesctay, May 02, 2007 7:52 AM
To; Private. Spellings, Margaret; Conaty, Joseph; Farris, Amanda; Landers. Angola; Evers, Bill;
Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia; Dorfman, Cynthia; Mesecar, Doug; Dunckel, Denise; Dunn,
David; Pitts, Elizabeth; Flowers, Sarah; McGrath, John; Talbert, Kent; Bdggs, Kerri; Kuzmich,
Holly; Toomey, Libra; Maddox, Lauren; Scheessele, Marc; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Beaten,
Meredith; Tucker, Sara Martjnez; Todd, Wendy; Halaska, Terrell; Tracy WH; Young, Tracy;
Zeff, Ken
Ditto, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Spellings Coiled To Testify About ’Reading First’ Complainl:s (EDWEEK)
Some new information about the financial ties between the program’s core advisers and several commercial products also
emerged during the hearing.
Edward J. Kame’enui, who is on leave from the University of Oregon while he directs the Education Department’s National
Center for Special Education Research, reported that he has earned about $150,000 in annual royalties from an ear~y-reading-
intervention program. Deb{~rah C. Simmons, a co-author on thal text, reported similar earnings.
Roland H. Good III, who developed the Dynamic indicators of Basic Early Lileracy Skills, reported that he has earned more
than $500,000 from sales of the assessment, which is used in a majority of Reading First schools. A panel tile three experts
served on gave DIBELS a positive review, but Mr. Good said he and his University of Oregon colleagues did not participate in the
evaluation.
Mr. Good noted thal DIBELS is available free to schools on the Intemet. But under questioning lrom committee members,
he acknowledged that many schools purchase neatly packaged versior~s of the test or spend money on hand-held computers
with DISELS software, all of which add p~fits to his testing company,
Followi’~g the Law
A leading critic of the department’s handling oi Reading First charged that Mr, Good’s attempts to discount his earnings
made from DIBELS were disingenuous,
"He outlined 12 differen! ways that he wasn’t making money off DIBELS, unl:il the committee asked the question just the
right way, and we find out that in fact it’s making a lot of money," said Robert E. Slav!n, a co-founderof the Baltimore-based
Success for All Founda|ion, whose complaints heiped launch the probe.
Mr. Dohedy, who said he had not profited personally from Reading First, maintained under intense questioning that he and
his colleagues followed the law in directing states to choose only those programs and tests that he and grant reviewers had
judged would meet the program’s strict requirements for being research-based.
"We really implemented the progran~ the way it was intended," Mr. Doherty said in an interview attar the hearing. °This
headng was very unrepresentative of the very successful Reading First program."
Vol. 26, Issue 35, Page 21
Private - Spellings, Margaret ..............................................
From: McLane~ Katherine
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 7:50 AM
To: Private - Spellings, Margaret; Lenders, Angola; Evers, Bill; Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia;
Dorfman, Cynthia; Mesecar, Doug; Dunckel, Denise; Dunn, David; Pitts, Elizabeth; Flowers,
Sarah; McGrath, John; Talbert, Kent; Briggs, Kerri; Kuzmich, Holly; Toomey, Liam; Maddox,
Lauren; Scheessele, Marc; Mcnitt, l’ownsend L; Benton, Meredith; Tucker, Sara Martinez;
Tada, Wendy; Halask.a, Ter~ell; Tracy WH; Young, Tracy; Zeff, Ken; Queries, Karen;
Bannerman, KrislJn; Watkins, Tiffany; Sampson, Vincent
Cc." Ditto, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Bush Pressing His Case On Renewal Of NCLB (EDWEEK)
May 2, 2007
Yield Documents, La’,~aaker Tells White House
By K_%RE;N W. ARENSON
The chairma~ of the House education commaittee asked the White House yesterday to tur~ over
all its colr~,3~,icatio..’:s about the scandal-tarred student loan program and also Reading
First, the acLministration’s $1-billion-a-year reading initiative, which has been besieged
by accusations of conflict of interest.
The request by the la,~aker, Representative George Miller, Democrat of California, carries
his inquiries into education policy-makin~ beyond the Education Depart~..ent itself and into
the Bush White House.
"The co;[dniztee’s ongoing investigations into both programs have revealed serious oversight
failures by senior officials," Hr. Miller’s office said in a statement.
The White House comm~unications sought include those from Margaret Spellings, the current
eduoation secretary, who previously served as ~resident Bushrs domestic policy adviser.
Ms. Spellings is to testify on both programs next week before Mr. Miller’s committee.
Emily Lawrimore, a presidential spokeswoman, said that the White House had received the
congressman’s request and that "we will review it and respond accordingly."
Steve Fords, a spokesman for the committee’s Republicans, said, "Overly broad and
politically motivated fishing expeditions will nst restore faith in these programs --
programs that continue helping millions of students learn t:~ rmmd and attend college, even
to this day."
The development yesterday was the latest turn in a variety of inquiries into a student
!oan industry that leading federal lawmakers and state investigators say benefits from
weak oversight and h9s an unacceptably close re[atJcnsh]_p with the Education] Department.
As for Reading First, the Education Department’s office of inspector general has sharply
criticized the department’s handling of the program, accusin~ its officials cf violating
conflicz-of-in~erest rules when 9warding ~ranLs to stares and of steering zontracts to
favored textbook publishers.
in addition te his request to the White House, Mr.
Miller asked the Edu.:::~tior~ Department yest’erday for records of comm~nications fxol~ seve~al
of ~.ts current and former high-ranking officials, including Rod ~aige, former secretary;
Wi].].Jam D. Hanson, former deputy secretary; Eugene W. Hickok, former under secretary and
then deputy secretary; and David Dunn, the current chief of staff.
Katherine NcLane, a spokeswoman for the department, said %t was reviewing the request.
Sepazately, the department sent out nc:_ice that it. ha.:] begun to tighten secu.rity measures
surrcund.:.ng access to a nationei student loan database that contains personal financial
information on millions of student aid appli.ca~ts.
Users of the database seeking info~~ation about a student will, for example, have to
provide a birth date and a first name, as well as a Social Security number. And msers wil!
be shown several random letters or numbers and be asked to retype them on the screen, an
approach Broadway ticket sellers use to help pre~ent computerized systems from buying up
multiple tickets.
Secretary Spellings suspended lende~ access to the database in mid-April, because of fears
that loan companies or other marketers were improperly obtaining information on potential
borrowers. That suspension remains in effect.
Do You Yahoc!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http:!/mail.yahoo.com
,Pri,va,~e - Spellin@s, Mar~]aret
From: katherine relane
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:13 AM
To: Oldham, Cheryl; Conklin, Kristin; $chray, Vickie; Dunckel, Denise; Shaw, T~rri; Sampson,
Vincent; Quades, Karen; Bannerman, Kristin; scott m. stanzel@who.eop.gov; jeanie_s.
_mamo@ed.gov; Beaten, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Ruberg, Casey; Colby, Chad; Williams,
Cynthia; D~nn, David; Dorfman, Cynthia; Evers, Bill; Kuzmich, Holly; La Force, Hudson;
Landers, Angela; MacGuidwin, Katie; Maddox, Lauren; Private - Spellings, Margaret;
McGrath, John; Mesecar, Doug; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; rob Saliterman; Yudef,
Samara; Scheessete, Marc; Halaska, Terreli; Toner, Jana; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Young,
Tracy; Ditto, Trey; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Zeff, Ken
Subject: Democrat Demands White House Student Loan Records (Reuters)
May i, 2007
Democrat Demands White House Student Loan Records
By REUTERS
Amid a conflict of interest, scandal that is sweeping through the $85 billion student loan
industry, Rap.
George Miller asked the White House te turn over e-mails and other records, including
those of Education Secletary Margaret Spellings, previously a White House domestic policy
adviser.
Miller, of California, also wrote to Spellings seeking records from her as well as former
Spe].l{nus is scheduled to zeszify on May iO before Miller’s House Education and L~bor
Committee.
Congress and state attorneys genera]. ~re probing all~gations of misconduct across the
st~ldent loan in~/stry. Investigators 9ccuse some college financial aid officers of taking
paymentsand perks from lenders in exchange for placing the companies, on "’preferred
].ender’’ lists shown to st,/d6nts-
Student Lendin9 Works, an Ohio nonprofit lender, said on Tuesday it has been left off all
but 12 of !00 such lists.
"’We believe that the ’preferred lender’ list system is broken and needs fixing. It no
lof~ger serves the inte£ests of students and their families,’’ the orga~]ization said.
Miller last week asked for an internal inquiry at theEducation Department into possible
conflicts of interest.
Another Democrat, Sen. Edward Kennedy cf Massachusetts, has asked Spellings to hand over
personnel files and financial disclosure reports for
~_.’7 Zdl~uation Department .=,mployees. K.=.,nnedy he~ds the S.~.na±e’s education ~.c.mmi~t~e.
Last m.:>r~th a manager in the Edu<:a[.[ou Department’s financial aid of rise was pa[. on ]~.ave
pending a review of his ownership of stock in Education Lending Group, former parent of
Student Loan Xpress, now a unit of CI~ Group lnc..
A!ong with Kenn~dv and Miller, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has been campaigning
to clean up the student loan business. Cuomo has said criminal charges may result,
As the inquiry has progzessed, lenders including Citigroup Inc., Sallie Mac, JPMorgan
Chase & Co. and Bank of ~erica Corp. have agreed to a coJe of conduct recommended by
Cuomo banning school-lender financial ties, "’preferred lender"’ list payments ~rld lender
gifts to college employees.
On Tuesday, the Washington Post repcrted that the Bush a~ministration killed a plan
drafted at the end of the Clinton administration to rein in payments and gifts that
student lenders showered on college financial aid officials.
DO YOU Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the b~st spam protection around bttp://mail.yahoo.com
Private- Spellings, Margaret _ _
From; McLane, Katherine
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 4:48 PM
To: Private - Spellings, Margaret; Landers, Angola; Evers, Bill: Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia;
Dorfman, Cynthia; Mesecar, Doug; Dunckel, Denise; Dunn, David; Pitts, Elizabeth; Flowers,
Sarah; McGrath, Johr~; Talbert, Kent; Briggs, Kerri; Kuzmich, Holly; Toomey, Liam; Maddox,
Lauren; Scheessele, Marc; Mcnitt, TDwnsend L.; Beaton, Meredith; Tucker, Sara Martinez;
Tada, Wendy; Halaska, Terrel!; Tracy WH; Young, Tracy; Zeff, Ken; Quades, Karen;
Bannerman, Kristin; Watkins, Tiffany; Sampson, Vincent; Conklin, Kristin; Otdham, Cheryl;
Schray, Vickie
Ditta, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Democrat demands White House student loan records (WP)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Democratic head of the U.S. House of Representatives education committee on
Tuesday asked the Bush admini stration to turn over emails and o~er records about its oversigaht of federa!
student loan programs.
Amid a conflict of interest scandal that is sweeping through the $85 billion student loan industry, Rep. George
Miller said investigators lbr his committee had found "serious oversigh, failures by senior officials."
Miller, of California.. asked the Bush administration for records including those of Education Secretary’ Margarel
Spellings, previously a White House domestic policy’ adviser.
Miller also w~rote to Spellings seeking records from her and from former Education SecretaW Rodney Paige,
former Paige adviser Beth Am~ Bryan and other department staffers. He also asked for documents on
administration oversight of Reading First, a reading program that is a key part of President George W. Bush’s
No Child Left Behind education law.
Spellings is scheduIed to testily, on May 10 before Miller’s education panel.
Investigators for Congress and severn states are probing "allegations of misconduct and conflicts of interest
across the student loan industry’.
Miller lasl week asked for an internal inquiry at the Education Department into possible conflicts of imerest.
Another Democrat, Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, has asked Spellings to hand over personnel files
and financial disclosure reports for 27 Education Department employees. Kennedy heads the Senate’s education
committee.
Earlier this month, a manager in the Education Deparlment’s financial aid office was put on leave pending a
review of his ownership of stock in Educmion Lending Group Inc., fom~er parent of Student Loan Xpress, now
a refit of CIT Group Inc..
Along with Kennedy and Miller, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has been cmnpaigning to clean
up the student loan business. Cuomo has said criminal charges may’ result.
Investigators have accused some college aid officers of taking payments and perks from lenders in exchange for
placing the companies on "p~eferred lender" lists shovm to students.
As the inquiry has progressed, lenders including Cifigroup Inc., Sallie Mae, JPMorgan Clmse & Co. and Bank of
America Corp. have a~eed to a code of conduct recommended by Cuomo bamning school-lender fmancial ties,
"preferred lender" list payments and lender gifts to college employees.
On Tuesday, the Washington Post reported that the Bush administration killed a pim~ drafted at the end of the
Clinton administration to rein in payments and gifts that student lenders showered on college financial aid
officials.
© 2007 Reuters
Page 1 of 9
The recent announcement that Montgomery County school officials were starting work on an annual
report of crimes committed by studenls and other disciplinary incidents underscored a surprising fact: In
this era of heightened concern about school safety, few Washington area schoot systems regularly report
such offenses to the public.
The annual School Safety Report, slated for publication in Montgomery starting in the 2008-09
academic year, will place ihe count3.’ almost alone among Maryland and Northern Virginia school
systems in reporting detailed school crime statistics to the public, according to education leaders and
lawrnakers. In much of this region, as in much of the nation, comprehensive reports on weapons, drugs
and sex in individual public schools simply don’t exist.
Among the area’s largest school systems, only Fairfax County reports school crime data online, as part
of its searchable database of school yeport cards. One other count?, Anne Arundel, publishes a hard-
copy student discipline report Mth annual crime data for individual schools. School systems in
Montgomery, Prince George’s, Howard, Loudoun and Prince William counties publish no such
document.
"It’s all theoretically available to the public but rather difficult tn obtain," said Montgomery Counb"
Council member Phil Andrews (D-Gaithersburg-Rockville), who has pushed for annual school crime
reporting.
SchooI systems in both states report student crime statistics to their state education departments. The
state agencies, in turn, ma.ke some data available to parents, but the depth and detail of what’s available
4t22/2008
Page 2 0[’9
D.C. school ollicials did not respond to requests for crime data. The city’s inspector general said in 2004
that the system had failed to keep adequate records on crimes in schools.
Kenneth Trump, a national authorib’ on school saJEb’ who testified before Congress on Monday, says
the underreporting of disciplinary incidents in area schools is part of "a historical cuIture of downplay,
deny, deflect mad defend when it comes to publicly acknowledging and reporting school crimes." It’s
driven, experts say, by an overarching concern among school princip’als to protect their image and that
of their school.
"If you’re the administrator and you report what happened, you may get blamed," said Jean O’Neil,
director of research and ev’~uation at the National Crime Prevention Council in Washingto.n. "If you’re
the administrator and you don’t ~eport what happened, you may get blamed."
There are exceptions. The school district in Broward Count),, Florida, publishes annual crime tallies for
every school that cover more than 20 categories of offense. Annual school crime reports in Pem~sylvania
span more than 30 categories.
But a Washington m’ea parent interested in knowing the kind ,and amount of weapons seized at her
child’s high school in the previous academic ye~ would have greater or lesser success, depending on
M~ere she lives.
The MaD’land State Department of Education publishes an annual report on student suspensions based
on seven comparatively broad categories of offense. But the report is little-k~mwn and buried deep
within the agency’s Web site. Mar?" Jo Nell, president of the MaiTland PTA, said she has never seen it.
[he Virginia Department of Education includes crime data in i~s annual school report cards, accessible
on the agency’s Web site; Fai~fax replicates the data on its site. :But the reports offer only three specific
categories of offense -- incidenls involving firearms, other weapon offenses and fights -- and a
somewhat broader tally of "serious incidents" involving significant injury. Charles Pyle, a spokesman
for the Virginia department, said the school crime eomponen~ is "a key piece" of the reporl card: "and
it’s gotten bigger and bigger eyeD’ year."
Montgomery’s Office of Legislative Oversight last year studied how the counW’s school system reports
crimes and concluded that its practices "do not currently include the routine sharing of all serious
incidenI data with the commtmity."
Little information is shared with parents, although, the report stated, "ahnost every, parent" interviewed
voiced strong interest in knowing more about school crime. The report cited widespread concern among
school staff thai reporting crime da~a might "create the wrong impression."
Wayde B. Byard, a spokesman for Loudoun schools, invoked a common belief among educators that
parents will ~nisuse crime data to "rate schools based on arbitrm)’ statisiics that often involve students
that are no longer at a school."
Michele Menapace, the county PTA president in Fairt:ax, said a school’s reputalion for safety is "one of
the first things that comes up" when officials propose shifting school boundaries. She has not heard,
however, that parents want more information on school crime.
Jane de Winter, the count)’ PTA leader in Montgomew, said the shortage of good crime data "is
412212008
Page ] of 9
something that we hear about pretty- frequently. We have asked Jbr better data. We’ve heard parents ask
for better data."
On a Sunday morning a few months back, I interviewed my final Harvard applicant of the year. After
saying goodbye to the girl and watching her and her mother drive off, I headed to the beach at the end of
our street for a run.
It was a spectacular winter day, bright, sunny and cold; the tide v-as out, the waves were high, and I had
the beach to mysel£ As I ran: I thought the same thing I do after all these interviews: Another amazing
kid who won’t get into Harvard.
That used to upset me. But I’ve changed.
Over the last decade, I’ve done perhaps 40 of these interviews, which are conducted by alumni across
the country. They’re nay only remaining link to my alma mater; i’ve never been back to a reunion or a
footba]I game, mad my total donations since graduating in th~ 1970s do not add up to four figures.
No matter how glowing my recommendations, in all this time only one kid, a girl, got in, many years
back. I do not tell this to the eager, well-groomed seniors who settle onto the couch in our den. They’re
under too much pressure already. Better than anyone, 1hey know the odds, particularly for a kid from a
New York suburb.
By the time I meet them., they’re pros at working the system. Some have Googled me because they think
knowing about me will improve their odds. After the interview, many send handwritten thank-you notes
saying how much they enjoyed meeting me.
I used to be upsel by these attempts 1o ingratiate. Since I’ve watched my own children go through
similar tortm’e, 1 find these gestures touching. Everyone’s twing so hard_
My reason for doing these interviews has shifted over time. When I started, my kids were young, and I
thought it might give them a little advantage when they applied to Harvard. That has turned out not to be
an issue. My oldest, now a college freshman, did not apply, nor will nay lavins, who are both high school
juniors.
We are not snubbing Hmward. Even my oldest, who is my most academic son, did not quile have the
ctass rank or the SATs. His SAT score was probably t00 points too low -- Ihough it was identical to the
SAT score that got me in 35 years ago.
Why do I continue to interview? It’s very, moving meeting all these bright young people M~o won’t gel
into Harvard. Recent news articles make it sound unbearably tragic. Several Ivies, including Harvard,
rejected a record number of applicants this year.
Actually, meeting the soon-to-be rejected makes me hope[hi about young people. They are far more
accomplished than I was at their age and without a doubt wj 11 do superbly wherever they go.
4/22/2008
Page
Knowing me and seeing them is like witnessing some major evolutionary change take place in just 35
years, from the Neandertha! Harvard applicant of 1970 to today’s fully evolved Homo sapiens applicant.
There was the girl who, during summer vacation, left her house before 7 each morning to make a two-
hour train ride to a major nniversi~’, where she worked all day doing cuttiJag-edge research for NASA on
weighdessness in mice.
When I was in high school, my 10th-grade science project was on plant tropism -- a shoebox with Soil
and bean sprouts bending toward the light.
These kids who don’t get into Harvard spend summers on schooners in Chesapeake Bay studying
marine biology, building homes for the poor in Central .America, retiring Europe with all-star orchestras.
Stunmers, I dug trenches for my local sewer department during the day, and sold hot dogs at Fertway
Park at night.
As I listen to them, I can visualize their parents, striving to teach excellence. One gift I interviewed
described how her thther made her watch the 2004 convention speeches by both President Bush and
Senator John Kerry and then ~ell him which she liked better and why.
What kind of kid doesn’t get into Harvard? Well, there was the ehm~ning boy 1 interviewed w-ith 1560
SATs. He did cancer research in the summer; played two insiruments in tl~ree orchestras; and composed
his own music. He redid the computer system for his student paper, loved to cook and was writing his
ow~ cookbook. One of his specialties was snapper poached in tea and served with noodle cake.
At his age, when I got hungry, I made myself peanut butter and jam on white bread and got into
Harvard.
Of course, evolution is not the same as progress. These kids have an AP history’ textbook thai has been
specially created to match the con*cut of the AP test, as well as review books and tutors tbr those tests.
We had no AP textbook; many of our readings came from primary documents, and lhere was no
Princeton Review then. 1[ ,,,,’as never tutored in anything and walked into the SATs without having seen a
sample SAT question.
As tbr my bean sprouts project, as bad it was, I did it alone. I inlerview kids who describe how their
schools provide a statistician to analyze their science project data.
I see these kids -- and watch my own applying to college -- and as evolved as they are, I wouldn’t
change places with them for anything. They’rc under such pressure.
1 used to say goodbye at my door, but since my own kids reached this age, 1 walk them out to their cars,
where a parent wails. 1 always say the same thing to the morn or dad: :’You’ve done a wondertitl job --
you should be very. proud.:’ And l mean it.
But I’ve slopped feeling bad about th.e looming rejection. When my four were little, I used to hope a
couple might go to ttarvard. [ pushed them, but by the end of middle school it was clear my twins, at
4/22/2008
Page 5 0[9
- least, were not made that way. They rebelled, and I had to learn to see who they were.
I came to maderstand that nay own focus on Harvard was a matter of not sophistication but narrowness.
grew up in ,an unworldly blue-collar environment. Getting perlbct grades and attending an elite college
v-as one of the few ways up I could see.
My four have been raised in an upper-middle-cla.ss world. They look around and see lots of avenues to
success. My wife’s two brothers struggled as students at ~nainstream colleges and both have made
wonderful full lives, one as a salesman, ~he other as a builder. Each tbund his own best path. Each
knows excellence.
That day, running on the beach, I was lost in my thoughts when a voice startled me. "Pops, hey, Pops!"
It was Sammy, one of my twins, who’s probably heading for a good state school. He was in his wetsuit,
surfing alone in the 30-degree weather, the only other person on the beach. "’~,]aat a day]" he yelled, and
his joy filled my heart.
Richard C. Levin, president of Yale Univexsity, has a problem: too many applicants, too few slots.
Of course, this is a problem that defines success in a process in wtfich the biggest rewards go to the
universities that attract and then reject the most applieanls.
But as this year’s version of the admissions demolition derby ~,Ands do,,~,’n for exhausted high school
seniors, two interesting issues m’e posed by a proposal of Dr. Levin’s to add two new undergraduate
residential colleges at Yale: Is this a good idea for Yale? And is his larger issue his problem or ours9
If any place is on safe footing in the admissions arms race,, it’s Yale, which last year beat out its
competitors by accepting only 9 percent of applicants. (This year the rate grew to 9.6 percent as
applications dropped, perhaps because some hi~ school seniors saw the futility, of applying.) So it’s
hard to look from afar at the proposal by Dr. Levin and not think, Why aren’t others doing this? His plan
would add two new residential colleges to the 12 existing ones, which would increase each class by
about 150 students, or more than I0 percent.
As he said in an interview._ after Yale expanded to its current size in the 1960s, there were roughly 4,000
to 5,000 applicants a year for 1,300 positions in the fresl~nan class. The size of the freshman class has
remained about the same, but now there are some 20,000 applicants, including a growing number of
international ones, plus all the other desired niches of miriorit3’ students, athletes, children of alums and
the rest.
"Expansion could help relieve those pressures ~md create more opportunities for students who are just
ordinary, extremely brilliant and talented students who don’t have any of those other connections," Dr.
Levin add. "We have astonishing educational resources here. If we can educate more students and give
them exposure to the opportunities here, 1 think we can make an even more .substantial contribution to
the nation and the world.."
The proposal is just that, and a decision is likely to come near the end of the year. If expansion is
4/22/2008
Page 6 of 9
approved, chances are that construction on the two colleges would begin in 201 t and be completed in
2013.
Adding 150 slots for 20:000 applicants goes only so far, but given file eve>expanding universe of
applicants, the idea has an undeniable logic. Princeton, too, is completing an expansion that will take
undergraduate enrollment to 5,9_00 in 2012, from 4,700 in 2005. The issue is particularly salient at state
flagship institutions.
But making space for more students is no small thing; each of the colleges at Yale would cost $200
million to buitd, plus other costs for educating the new students. People have understandable won’ies
about changing the intimate culture at Yale. Sludents say’ the new colleges might have the feeling of
being too far from the heart of the campus. And, perhaps not surprisingly, students who won the
admissions ganae seem focused on protecting their place in the pecking order. "I don’t see any reason not
to just keep it selective," said Joanna Boyle, a senior from Los Angeles.
Sigh. Wttich brings us back to the broader questions worth asking. Last week, in one of those "you Can’t
make it up" episodes, Marilee 30nes, the admissions dean at the Massachusetts Institute of Teclmology,
who had been one of the strongest voices for toning dovm the college hysteria, resigned ’alter admitting
she had fabricated her own education credentials.
BUT high school counselors and admissions experts who aren’t invested in the game say there really is a
backlash building against the notions that. a college’s ranking or status is a proxy for educational quality,
and that teenagers should spend their high school years in a frenzy ofresttme building, the better to get
into the college rue!! esteemed by guidebook editors and readers.
So, most of thmn agree that if Yale can make it work, getting a few more people into the tmiversity is
almost certainly a good thing. But convincing a lot more people that there’s life beyond the 20 or so
colleges on the standard striver’s shopping list would be even better.
Even Dr. Levin says there’s something perverse about the current system, where "prestige and reputation
tend Io depend on how many students you reject."
Lloyd Thacker, a former high school guidance counselor who founded the Education Conservancy, a
nonprofit group that has become a persistent voice against admissions hysteria, criticizes what he calls
"driving under the influence of rm~kings."
The question now, he says, is who will take the lead in changing the way the game is played. A few
years back it was a fringe question. Now it’s one that a Iot of people within education, not just high
school seniors with tread marks on their backs, are asking -- even if no one has figured out what to do
about it.
"Admissions professionals are engaging in a lot of soul-searching about what we’re doing," said Barmak
Nassirian, a spokesman for the American Association of Collegiate Registrm’s m~d Admissions Officers.
"People realize the system as a whole is getting out of hand. They’re aware we have set up a system in
which rational behavior on the part of each player is contributing to a major national act of irrationality-."
4/22/2008
Page 7 of 9
WASHINGTON ! V~qaen the Kmasas City public schools lost federal money tbr flmJr new reading
program, Robert Slavin was plenty, distressed.
Slavin, who designed the program used in Kansas City, had seen the pattern all too often: Local officials
try to get government grants to help pay for the Success For All program mad then realize it has lkllen
out of bureaucratic favor in Washington.
"There have been many of these decisions -- this is only the latest," said Slavin, a researcher at Johns
Hopkins University- in Baltimore.
Prompted by a growing list of such complaints, the House Education Committee is looking into whether
the Bush administration steered contracts to its favorite vendors, shutting out Slavin and others.
The administration denies any favoritism.
Still, the Education Department’s inspector general has asked the J~astiee Department to examine
allegations of mismanagement and conflicts of interest that sMrl around the $6 billion federal ~ant
program, hmwn as Reading First, a centerpiece of the five-yeax-old No Child Left Behind taw,
Inspector General John Higgins said his office began investigating Reading First after receiving
complaints in May 2005.
He lold the House conwnittee that the law passed by Congress called tbr a balanced panel of experts to
review ~ant applications but that the department had reeared a panel that had professional ties to a
specific reading program.
U.S. Rep. George Miller.. a California Democrat and the committee’s chairman, said in an April 20
hearing that committee invesligators lbund tt~ee people involved in the reviewing process had benefi~ed
financially, either direc@ or indirectly.
At the hearing, the three panel members acknowledged that they benefited from the sale of an
assessment product called the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Learning Skills, or DIBELS. One of
the panel members was a co-author of the product, and the company in which he owned a 50 percent
share received more than $1.3 million in royalties and other payments from the sale of DIBELS.
The two other panel members ’~.ere co-authors of a reading-intervention product that was packaged with
DIBELS, and they each received about $150,000 in royally payments *br the sale of the product.
But all three denied any conflim of interest, saying they did not vote on their own products as part of the
gram reviews. They also said their products were selling because of their populariD’, not because of any
pressure from Washington.
Bush administration officials are defending the Reading First gran~ progreun, which is part of the
president’s effort to get all schoolchildre-n reading by lhird grade. They point to rising test scores since
the program began in 2002.
In a report earlier this month, Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said that from 2004 to 20t)6, the
percentage of firs,-graders who me~ or exceeded proficiency increased 14 percentage points, from 43
percenl to 57 percenl. She said that during the stone period the percentage of third-graders who met or
exceeded proficiency rose 7 percentage points, from 36 percent to 43 percent.
4/22/2008
Page 8 of 9
Christopher Dohe~_, who managed the Reading First program for five years, said the Education
Department never maintained a list of favored reading programs.
one was ever told they must use a certain program or programs instead of others," said Doherty,
left the post last year.
One of Reading First’s biggest defenders is the president. SpeWing Tuesday- at a school in the New
York neighborhood of Harlem, Bush said: "I appreciate the fact that nationwide, 9-year-olds have made
more progress in five years than in the previous 28 years combined on these tests in reading
The....
pipelhae is beginning to be flfll of little readers that are competent readers."
But Spellings is sure to be on the hot seat May 10, when she will testify, before the House Education
Con~rtittce on her department’s oversight of the program.
Congress approved Reading First as a way to help punic schools improve reading instruction by giving
them federal money to pay for teacher training and materials.
When Kansas City lost its $3 million reading grant, school officials blmaaed a poor application by the
district, not bias.
But Siavin said Kansas City’s .experience was clearly linked to the widening probe on Capitol Hill.
"There’s not the slightest question in my mind," he said.
While grant reviewers are allowed lo conduct their work anonymously, Slavin said he had asked the new
~der’~ Reading First director to examine exactly what went wrong with Kansas City’s applicatipn.
Kansas City, officials said they ~vere aware of the controversy in Washington artd they were doing more
analysis of the district’s failed bid.
"There is a lot of smoke in the ~oom,:’ Superintendent Anthony Amato said. "We have to analyze this. I
don’t know if we were caught in the cross hairs with that," he said, relErring to the alleged bias against
Success For All.
Amato said that the district had sent a letter to state officials, asking for a full review of its bid. "I’m not
giving np on this," he stfid.
At Amato’s urging, most of K,-msas City’s schools have used Success For All this year. But the district
was denied money to expand the program to 15 schools that were using other Reading First curricula.
The Success For All program has generated controversy in the district, partly because il was installed so
quickly.
Supporters say that the program, which emphasizes phonics, is a good way to reach young children from
poor families.
Under Success For All, pupils are grouped by their reading levels, not grades. For 90 minutes each day,
nearly all teachers in a school teach reading by the script. No interruptions are allowed.
,At the April 20 hearing, Miller said investigators had found examples "where states were essentially
bullied" to use favored reading programs in order ~o get federal aid.
4/22/2008
Page 9 or 9
An associate commissioner with the Kentucky Department of Education testified that the state was
pressured by then-Reading First Director Doherty to &’op one ofils reading assessments and that it
quickly received federal funding after doing so.
Miller said the federal program can be added ’~to that long and growing list of instances of the
administration operating outside the law."
He said congressional in-~’estigators had been investigating for months, reviewin~o thousands of
documents and inte~wiewing dozens of people.
Sen. Edward M. Kermedy, the head of the Senate’s Education Committee, said the Bush administration
has a record "of political manipulation m~d cronyism that have tainted" the reading program. The
Massachusetts Democrat said that "schools across the cotmtry were pressured into rising specific reading
curricula that were backed by the programs" administrators’ political agendas."
Slavin, who filed a formal complaint with the Education Department alleging bias, has worked on the
St~ccess For All reading program for more than two decades. His program has been used at more than
1,200 schools, and he is still pea-plexed why it felt out of favor in Washin~on. Slavin said that even with
Doherty gone, the bias remains.
"They’ve done nothing to deal with the fact that the program was set up to exclude certain programs,
despite their evidence of effectiveness," Slavin said.
Kennedy has introduced a bill that would require federal employees and contractors involved in Reading
First to file yearty t]nancial disclosures showing any ties to publishers or organizations that benefit from
the program. His bill also would increase monitoring in an attempt to enmtre that no federal employee
uies to influence or control local curriculum decisions.
4/22/2008
From: Ruberg, Casey
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 8:39 AM
To; Private - Spellings, Margaret; Landers, Angola; Evers, Bill; Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia;
Dorfman, Cynthia; Mesecar, Doug; Dunckel, Denise; Dunn, David; Pills, Elizabeth; Flowers,
Sarah; McGrath, John; Talbert. Kent; Briggs, Kerri; Kuzmich, Holly; Toomey, Liam; Maddox,
Lauren; Scheessele, Marc; Mcnitt, Tc~vnsend L.; Beaton, Meredith; Tucker, Sara Martinez;
l-ada, Wendy; Halaska, Terrell; ’Tracy WH’; Young, Tracy; Zeff, Ken; Ditto, Trey; Neale,
Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrelt, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Student Loan Industry Stories (6)
042107 In the
"~ews.doc {111 KB..,
04,21.07 Ix the News
The WashingTon Post: Key !nihiati-~e Of ’NO Child’ Under Federal Investigation; Officials
Profited From Reading First Program (Amit
The Washington Post: Federal Overseer Of Student Loans Invested in ],enders; She Owned
Stock in 5 Large Firms (.~~it Palmy)
The Washington Post: Fe~ty, Jar~ey and Bobb Pledge United Effort to Address Issues (Theola
Labb~- }
The Waskington Post: Opinions: Nurse for ~ecica? (John Morrow)
The Ne~- York Times: Student L.emder Discloses Ties to Collages That Included GiFts to
Officials (Sam Dillon)
The New York Times: Colleges Relying on Lenders zo Counsel Students (JulJe
FOX News: Saving ’No Child Left Behind’ From Itself ~Dan Lips)
"That sounds like a criminal enterprise to me," said Rap. George Miller ~O-Calif.),
chairman of the House ednzation committee, which he].d a five-hour investigative hearing.
"You don’t get tc override the law," he angrily told a pane! of Reading First officials.
"But: the fact of the matter is that you did,"
The Education Department’s inspector general, John P. Higgins Jr_, said he has made
several referrals to the Justice Department ~bout the five-year-old program, which
provides grants to improme re~dSng for children in k.~dergarten through third grade.
Higgins declined to offer mor’e specifics, hut Christopher J. Ooherty, former director of
Reading First, said in an interview- that he was questio~.:ed by Justice officials in
November. The civil division of the U.S. attorney’s cff~ce for the DZstrict, which can
bring criminal charges, is reviewing the matter.
Puberty, one of the two Education Department employees who oversaw the initiative,
acknowl~dged yesterday that his wife had worked for a decade as a paid consultant for a
readin~ program, Direct Instruction, that investigators said he improperly tYied to forme
schools to use. He repeatedly failed to disclose the conflict on financial disclosure
forms.
"I’m very proud of this program and my role in this pro.~ram," DohertZ said in the
interview. "I t.bink it’s been implemented in accordance ~ith the law."
The management of Reading First has come under attacks fr.cm members of both parties.
Federal investigators say pr.~gram officials improperly forced .... ate~. to use certain t~sts
and tax<books created by those officials.
One official, Roland H. Good III, said his company made $1.3 million off a reading test,
known as DIBEL$, th.~t was endorsed by a Reading First evaluation pane! he sat on. Good,
who owns half the company, 0ynamic Meas~!rer~ent Group, .~old the committee tha~ he donated
royalties From the .oroduct to the U[:iv~rsity of Cregcn, where ~e is an associate
pro[essor.
Two former University o2 Oregon reseat_chef’s on the panel, Edward J. Kame’enui and .Deborah
C. Si~.uuons, sa~d they received about $150,000 in royalties la-st yea’r for a program that is
now packaged with DIBELS. ’.[hey testified that they -_~eceived smaller royalties in previous
years for the .~::c.gram, Scott Foresman Early Rea.dl;~g interver;tion, 9rid did not know it was
being sold with DImELs.
Members of the pad:e± said they focused themselves from voting on their ow~’. products but
did asNes.s their competitors. Of 24 tests approved by .h.~ co~,~ittee, seven were tied to
members of the panel.
"Z ragsat the percepnion of conflicts of intercst," said l<ame’enuJ, former chairman of the
committee, ~:ho now works at the department as commissioner of the Nationa! Center for
Special Ed~c~tion Rcs.earch. "But there was no real conflict of interest being engaged in."
The in<_ricate finar, c.~al connections between Reading First. pro.ducts and program officials
extend beyond issues she c[,r.~itree explored
Another xesea~cher, Sharon Vsughn, woxked with Kam~’enui, Si~m0ns and Good to design
Vcyage~ [?niversal Literacy, a progra~: that Reading First officials urged states to use.
Vaughn was director o± B center at she Un£versit~ of T~xas that was hired to provide
states advice o[: selecting Reading Pits[ tes[s and hooks.
The publisher cf zhai: proguct., voyager Expanded Learning, was -~ounde~ and run by Randy
Best, a major B~ssh. campaign contributor, who sold the cc.mpany i~ 2005 fo~ more than $350
mi|liono Now Best runs Highe~- Ed Holdings, a company that develops colleges of education,
where former education secre~;.ary F.oderick R. Paise is a senior adviser and C-.. Reid Lyon,
Bush’s former reading adviser, is an executive vice president.
"I’m very disappointed and s~ddened by the information: that ~o.~aspro~..d-’ e:~ ..... a< the hearing.
today," said L,ion, who had .......
~= n a strong defender of Reading First, which he said had
2
nothing to do with his ne~~ job. "The issues appear much more serious than I had been led
to understand,"
Despite the controversy surrounding Reading First’s management, the percentage of students
in the program who are proficient on fluency tests has risen about i5 percent, Education
Departmei:t officials said. School districts across th8 country praise the program.
Members of both parties continue to support the goals of Reading First even as they attack
J.ts management. Miller and Senate education committee Chairman Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.)
joined Republicans yesterday in pledging £o tighten restrictions on conflicts o£ interest
in No Ch~].d Left Behind.
gducation Secretary Margaret Spellings, who declined to comment yesterday, has said
management problems with Reading First "reflect individual mistakes." But Doherty said
nearly every aspect of the program was carefully monitored by the department and the White
House, where SpellJ.nq was Bnsh’s top education adviser.
"This program was always firmly under the watch and control of the highest levsls of the
government~" Doherty said.
The No. 3 official in the U.S. Department of Education, who oversees the student loan
industry, had more than $]0,000 invested in student lenders, according to documents
released last night.
Sara Martinez Tucks.r, the agency’s undersecretary responsible for financial aid and higher
educmtion, reported the shares in financial disclos’ore forms filed in October 2006 and
release~ yesterday in response tea request from The Washington Post.
The department said she had not violated any ethics rules, which prohibit employees from
working on matters involving a company in which zhey hold more than $15,000 in stock. The
forms show that Tucker held $2,745 in Bank of America, $2,597 in Citlgroup, Si, 923 in
Wells Fargo, $1,134 in J.P. Morgan Chase and $1,615 in Wachevia. Those companSes are five
of the six fargoat student lenders.
The disclosure comes in the midst of a widening student loan scanda! exposing financial
ties among le~~ders, univers.ities and government officials. Matteo Fontana, another
:]epartment official who helped oversee the $85 billion-a-year industry, was suspended this
month after reveiaticns that he held more than $100,00,3 worth of stock in a single loan
company.
Martinez Tucker, who declined Lo cc~ent through ~ spokeswoman, was confirmed by the
Senate late iasa year. She previously was president of the Hispanic Scholarship Fund,
which has awarded scholarships to about 7~,00~ students. Before Ehar she was an ~xecutive
at AT&T.
"Sara Marhinex Tucker is a public servanu o£ the highest ethics and ~nteg].-ity, " said
Katherine McLane, a department spokeswoman. "She :’:as he]~ed thousands of Hispanic
.~mericans afford college, and ~*.~e are sn %c.rq’cnate to have h,~r working on behal, f of all
America’s student~. "
3
By Theola Labb@, Washington Bust Staff
Saturday, April 21, 2097;
The District’s mayor, school superintendent and school board president pledged yesterday
that they would work together, proffering a sho~ of unity one day after the 9.C. Counci!
approved a mayoral takeover of ~he schools.
Em÷rging from ~ closed-door meeting that lasted 15 minu£es, Mayor Adrian M. Fenty {D),
Board of Education President Robert C, Bobb and Superintendent Clifford B. Janey stood
shoulder to shoulder before television cameras. They displayed none of the b±ttez~ess and
infighting that marked the battle over the takeover proposal., and said they would
cooperate to iron out issues such as the school budget, a forensic audit of the school
system’s finances a~]d other transitio~ issues.
The meeting of the three men so soon after Thursday’s hJ.storio ~ote was desigr~ed to
reinforce the message that the deterio~’ating schools ~eed attention immediately.
"We think it’s mandatory for the future of this city, and the future of the children in
our school system, that the thzee of us . get together as soon as possible to start
discussir~g how we are going to work together," Fenty said during a 19-minute news
conference at the school system’s headquarters.
It became visible when reporters asked about £enty’s proposal to create a new position --
that of a chancellor, who would report directly to the mayor. Fenty deflected quesuions on
who[~i he might select as his chancellor to run the 55,000-student school, system.
But Jan~y, when asked whether he thought he might be th_= fJ.rst chancellor, ~ep!ied, "i
hold myself in high regard. ~ .He said he intended to be a part of the planning for the
transition.
"I expect fully to move forward ~.s part of this team," he said. "I didn’t come here for a
y~ar. I didn’t come here for t~7o years. I came here to make a commitment to the children,
to th~ £ami.].i~s ~nd th~ co~mmunity of ~sh±ng~o~, D.C. "
Reinforcing his p~int, Janey added: "We’re in some stage of transitJ, on -- I’m not."
But ne~.ther Jar;ey’s declarations nor Fenty’s vow to, work with Jam=ey a~’]d Bobb prevented
elected officials an:~ parents from questioning whether Jar.ey would re~.~ain in his job.
"I would like the mayor to make a decision about who is running the &chool system," said
council member Jack Evans (B-Ward 2), ~ho supported the takeover. "Is Clifford Janey
staying? We need to hav~ a chancellor in place by the start of school."
Parent activist Cherlta ~hiting said it was tJ.me for the mayor to reveal whom he intends
as chamcellor.
"Iz’s time for him to come clean and say whether he plans on keeping Dr. ~aney, yes or
no," said Whiting, whose son ]s a junior .at McKinley Techr~ology High School. "If not, who
do you plan on replacing him with? Who are your candidates? And what part wi]} the public
play?"
Evans sa~.d a pri.ority is getting quick approval [rum Congress for a bil.l, permitting the
new arrangement. He said he also would like Fenty’s administra:ior~ to begin evalu:~ting the
school budget, "given [.he state of ~’hat [Chief Fin.~Jncial Of£~cer Nat;~ar M.] Gandhi could
only describe as cha.os. "
Counc~l Chairman Vincent C:. Gray (O) said he expe~ts Fenty, ,.~anay and Bobb to ~.~odern.~.ze
schools so studenks are not raced with "b]oken ba[hro..-..ms and peeling paint" when they
r~turr~ in t~~e..fa.ll.
"From the perspective of ~a±ents and stude~.ts, they wan~_ to know that s,.-.hools aze. going to
~pen on time, " Gray said.
[.’.onna Fower Stowe, execative director of the nonprofih DC Education Compact, said she
didn’z expect to bear specific plans or a I.i~:et:able tot addressing issues. But she said
she was g].ad that after i.’.~onths or often-contentious debate, .it seemed thaq the me~ had
e×changed olive branches.
"It’s not always easy to get to that point [of cooperation] when you’ve been looking
critically at an issue, but they all agree that this is the most important issue in the
city," Stowe said. "It will probably sound a little sappy, but i think that’s good."
Council me,tuber Jim Graham In-Ward I) said the news conference showed cooperation between
the mayor and school board. "It’s a hopeful sign," he said.
Fenty said the three m~n plan to meet next week with Gandhi to discuss the school system’s
finances.
Staff writer Nikita Stewar~ contributed to this report.
Opinions
By John Morrow?
Saturday, Apri! 21, 2007; AI7
This week seniors at some of _~merica’s most prestigiot~s colleges learned whether they’d
beei~ accepted into Teach for ~merica, which recruits <he "heat and brightest" 2rom Yale,
Duke, B~own, Dartmouth ahd other top colleges and p~ts them through intensive summer
tra±nin[. The program is a proven magnet: 10.4 percent of Yale’s Class of 2006 applied, as
did g.6 percent of Dartmomth’s graduating seniors. Scripps College topped the list, with
!5.7 percent.
Most schools of education accept just abomt e~eryone who applies, b~]t Teach for America,
which pmts capable, smart a~d idealistic young men and women into some of the country’s
tomghest pnbl±¢ schools, reje~t~ ~ ~tonishin~ 83 ~rcent of it~ ~ppiicants.
If they don’t make the cut at Teach for America, man;, students ~¢ill fall back to their
second choices, often tou law or business schools or high-paying jobs on Wall Street.
S~venty-seven perce~t of those who are accepted will enter Teach for Ar~erica. By
comparison, only 71 percent of those ace÷prod into Yale choose to enroll. The "yield" J.s
lower at Princeton, at 69 percent, and Stanford, 67 percent.
Teach for America, now in its 18th year, has become the ccun..-..ry’s largest prcvider of
teachers for low-income co:mmunities. What began in 1990 with 500 men and women work.~ng in
six co~mu~r_.ities has grown to 4,400 teachers working with 375,000 students.
The success of ~each £or ~merica has inspired the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation to create a
similar program -- it olans to d~.atribute $I0 million in grants -- to provide guidance and
counseling at high schools Jn nine states. That program will recruit and stain college
seniors to work full time as advisers for crle or two years attar they grade]ate.
"it will be the nexL Teach for .~erica0" Vance <.ancaster of the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
to].d me in an e-mail, although they’re not c~llir~g it Advise for ~,merica. Instead it’s the
College Advising Ccrps.
[]nf<:.rtunately, the success of Teach for .~erica rsveals an unpleasant. [.r’uth abol~t how
]1tt]e we value education amJ uhildrer:. Consider another helping profession tkaL is often
cure,pared with teaching: nursing. Just as there’s a teaching shcrtaqe, the United States
despmralely needs nurses. Nationally, hospitals have about 210,00(} empty nursing slots,
~ccording to the U.S. Eepart~ent of Health and lluma~ Services.
But. there is no "Nurse for America" program, because it’s inconceivable that someone co~id
step tn and provide nursing care after just two months of summer training.
Just imagin.~.: "Hi, Mrs. Lingering. I’m John Merrow, your new z:urse. I just graduated
Dartmo~th. No~" let’s see. It says Vou get two cc’s of this medicine. That’s about ~he same
as a tablespoon, isn’t it? ~d I’m s~0p~csed to e×am[ne you. Do you know which orifice this
instrument goes in?"
No, we will never have a Nurse for America program, because that pro£ession’s standards
are higher than those of teaching. Nobody says, "Those ~ho can, do. Those who can’t,
nurse." That slur is reserved for teaching, an occupation that’s ridiculously easy to
on:or, at least through education schools.
So, two cheers ~or TeaGh for America -- but wouldn’t it be ~onder[ul if Nurse for ~erica
and Teach lot ~merica were equally inconceivable? If teachin~ could become not merely an
honorable calling but ~ise a w~ll-paying, highly respected profession that was difficult
to get into?
The writer is president of Learning M~tters Inc. and education correspondent for "The
NewsHour Wihh Jim Lehrer."
By S~I~ DILLON
No!net, a major student loan company, yesterday offered a broad accounting of many often
unpubliclzed relationships it has established with universities and their senior
officials, including managing telephone ca!l centers, paying cell.ego officials for
speaking engagements and giving plane tickets to financial aid officers.
The revelations came in a broad new discl[~sure statement the iender made Jn connection
with an agreement to contribune $I million to educate college borrowers and to abide by a
code of conduct governing its relations with colleges.
Nelnet, b~ed in LincoAn, Nob., with $23.8 billion in student .ioan assets, forged the
agreement wiqh the Nebraska attorney general, Jon Bruning. The company’s president,
Jeffrey Noozdhoek, appeared with Mr. Brmninq at a news conference yesterday to announce
it.
The disclosures resulted from a review" by Nelnet of its own practices in the student loan
industry, begun earlier .:his year after Andrew M. Cuomo, New York’s attorney general,
announced tJ,at he was inve.stigating r.he company, said Ben Kiser, a Nelnet spokesman.
]n the ~ews conference in Linco.]~., :dr. 5tuning characterized any wrongdoing by the company
as minimal. "As w~ looked at the scale of mistakes that have been made in the stl~dent
lending industry, Nelnet is at uhe bert.on," he said.
But in New York, Mr. Cuomo said, "Our investigation of Nelnet is con.--inuing."
The company announced an end 1o some of its practices, including a revenue sharing
agreement with ?~es.nern il].inois University under which Ne].ner paid the university a
percentage of all pr.iva-qe college loans that its students took oat with Nelnet.
Nelnet also said it had paid a fee, ,-_.n erie occasion, to a university chancellor for giving
a speech to an advisory board the company ha.,.] established. "Nel[~e~_ inlands to end such
payments," the statemen.-, said.
On another cccasio.n, i.ielnet bought Albany-to-:de~-z York plane tickets for t~u university
financial aid officers so the!/ could qc to the theater. Mr. Kiser dee:iced to identify the
off~c~al2 or :hei~ uz]iversi’zy a[f[liatioE.
The company said it would continue to mam~ge telephone call centers fc:r ~he financial aid
c.~fices of seven educational instlt’/tions, but its call ~t~nter operators would n.:~w
"disclose to all callers that they are Nelnet employees when they answer the phone."
~’reviously, students seeking financial aid advice could have been left thinking they were
speaking to a university official. Earlier this year, Mr. Cuomo wrote a code of conduct
governing the relations among universities and lenders, banning revenue-sharing agreements
on student loan volume and gifts he senior officials, and forbiddin9 loan company
employees from ever identifying themselves as college officials.
He has reached agreements with Citibank and Sallie Mae to mbide by the code. Each has paid
$2 million ~o a fund similar to the one to which Nelnet is contributing. Education Finance
Partners, another student lean company that investigators found had paid at least 60
colleges aRd universities across the country for steering studenzs to its loa~s, agreed to
p~y $2.5 million to Mr. Cuomo’s fund.
Mr. Bruning announced yesterday that ~]elnet would abide by a similar code of conduct,
mostly written by Nelnet officials.
"I would say that ~;e primarily wrote it, but worked with Bruning’s office," said Mr.
Kisez, the Nelnet spokesman.
By JULIZ BUSMAN
Rachel Jones, a senior at Loyola Marg~ount University in Los Angeles, recently was sitting
through a student-loan workshop that university officials had told her was mandatory when
an nneasy feelinq kicked in.
The woman in the front of the classroom asked students to fill out forms with personal
information -- including names, addresses and phone m:mbers of relatives, an employer and
a friend. Ms. Jones zecalled that she also talked about "other loan companies" that would
saddle students Witl] un£avoxabie rates if they decided to consolidate loans on graduation.
Unable te keep qui~t, Ms. Jones raised her hand: "I just said, excuse me, who are you and
what is your affilia.-_ion?" The woman identified herself as an employee of All Student
Loa~:, a California-based lellder.
Jones, a 22-ye~r-old who has $17,000 in student loans, had unwittingly stumbled upon
and}thor undisclosed relationship betweea universities and loan companies.
Recent investigations have largely f.ocnsed on incentives lenders give universities tc get
cove~ed placement on th=_ pre.ferred lending lists students use to take out Loans when they
enter college. But colleges also gl..ve lenders crucial access to students when they are
graduating, using lenders to conduct exit counseling required under federal law for
students who have taken out federally guaranteed student loans.
In some cases, loan company represenbatives come on campus and run sessions fox seniors on
loan repayment. In others, colleges direct students to loan company Web sites, including
Wells Fargo, C~tibank and S9llie Mac. And in man/ cases, the lear, companies ~re pushing a
product: theix o6nsolidaticn loans.
Anne Frisco, the vice president for enrollment management at Loyola, defended the
practice, saying the ]en~e:’s allowed on campus were carefully selected, "Every yeaz when
we have exit interviews we ask i[ <hey want to assist," Ms. Frisco said. "They are just
:here to puovide additional information,°’
Oil]era say the access to students is improper. Heather k’.cDonn,21l, the director of
financial aid at Sarah Lawrence Ce.].]ege in Brenxviile, N.Y., said she th(;ught :.~sJng loan
companies for e×iT c¢,~~nseling was "absolately" inappropriate.
"Behind every lender is a conso].idaZion loan," i.~s, McDonnell said. "] dc~’t allow anybody
to come on my campus io come and do that. I just don’t think iz’s a good idea. I think
that information should be coming directly from the financial aid office."
Many students have vaxious kinds of loans, an<{ consolidation allows them to combine the
!oans to pay a single inherest rate and make one monthly payment.
Karen Gross, the president of Southern Vermont College and a professor of law at New York
Law School, said depending on a studentrs prospective job, income and health,
consolidating loans was often unwise. For example, she said, students who t~ke certain
public sector jobs may sign away available benefits if they consolidate federal loans.
~Tbere is no shortage of erroneous information that a student ~ould receive in a ~ro~p
counseling session," Ms. Gross said. "Student loan consolid~ti0n makes sense for ~any
students, but for many students it is absolutely not the right choice." She Bdded that
"the reason this is bothersome is that students are required to eDgage in exit interviews,
and so lenders have 9 cap:ire audience."
The reason exit interviews are mandatory is that the federal government wants to crack
down on default rates. According to the Department of Education, exit counseling is
intended to explain borrowers’ rights and responsibilities, 10an repayment and the
consequences of default.
Students who consider skipping the sessions are often threatened with severe consequences.
At Loyola, an e-mat! message from the financial aid office said, "A HOLD will be placed on
your account end will only be removed upon your attendance at one of the above sessions.=
A hold typically prevents a student from registering for classes or even receiving a
diploma.
Many institutions send stude~’~s to complete exit counseling online through Direct Loan
$ervici~’..g, part of the Department of Education. But others do not.
Cape].la University, an online institution where the director of financial aid was recently
put on leave for accepting consulting fees from a loan company, allo~s Collegiate Funding
Services, a loan consolidation company, re conduct online exit sessions and introduce its
"consolidation product."
Through a spokeswoman, <:apel].a said that "~s part of the online counseling process,
szudents are asked by C.F.S. whether they have an interest in debt consolidation."
The University ~f Maryland Etstern Shore, according to a recent news release, allows at
].east one lender, Consolidation Resource Center, to co~~duct exit counseling. The s~me news
release also announced the company’s SlO, O00 donation tDa university schol~rship fund.
University offiaials did ~ot return repeated calls for comment.
All Student Loan, which ran exit intervie~;s at Loyola, h~s conducted 25 counseling
sessions at 20 institutions this year, sa~d Joseph Booth, a company spokesman.
The Indiana Institu<e of Technology directs students to complete exit uounseling through
OpenNet, an online service run by Sailie Maa, the nation’s largest lender to college
students. The Web sites of Geo~Be Washington University 9nd Case Western Reserve
~Jn~versitZ in Cleveland show that they do, too~
Before signing in, students must agree to a disclaimer al].o~;.~.ng Saiiie Mac to ,Ise their
data for ~urposes beyond loan process ir.g, "provided the proposed ~]sage does not viol~te
~.p!icable laws and regulat’:ons or any confidentiality obliga:ions."
lhe £[n~ncial ~id director at Indiana Tech, Teresa M. Vasquez, said, "I didn’t know that."
She said Indiana Tech had been using Saliie Mac’s exit counseling for three years.
7om Joyce, a spokesman for $,allie Mac, said the students" data was shared with the
szudents" lenders, whom they i.:lentify i~: the online exit counseling. Sail. to Mac also uses
their e-mail addresses to send solici-?.ations frcm "partners" of Sallie Mac, "where we
struck deals w.~th industry-]e~ding third parties, like Geicc for insuzance," .".[z. Joy~e
said.
At t~;e end of the ccunse.ling, a ],ink lead,<, students to consolidate k:ith Sallie Mac if Lhey
choose, Mr. Joyce said, but it is available or~ly it. students who h~ve already chosen
Sallie Mac as a
The Department of Education does r, ot forbid the use of private lenders to conduct exit
counseling, a spokeswoman, Jane Glickman, said. "A lender may participate in exit
counseling sessions of@ered by the school,’" she said, "provided th-nt the school maintains
control of the session and school staff members are present."
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, -~e~.,:.. Massachusetts_ De:~ocr’at ~.lho is chairman of the education
committee, is examining exit co’ansellng as part of an in~estigation into student lel%ding.
Mr. Kennedy said in a statement, "When schools refer students to these co~]nseling
services, they should be able ’to rely on honest advice about their financial future -- not
be subjected to unexpected marketing pitches from lenders."
Ms. Prisco of Loyola said that next year the university ~ould consider making it clearer
that the sessions were conducted by !endezs. "i’m not saying that maybe we can’t make
things a little more transparent," she said.
Weeks after her exit counseling at Loyola, Ms. Jones is still marveling over the session.
She wrote an opinion column in the studer, t ne~-sp.~per, The Los Angeles Loyolan, denouncing
the workshop as "nothing more than an hourlong advertisem~.nt."
"It just seemed real].y shady and underhanded the ~:ay it was run," Ms. Jones said. "I still
feel like I was duped."
Rssociated Press
Investigator makes Justice Department referral in contro:,ersial federal reading program
JESSE J. HOLLAND
John] Hiqgins, the Educatio.n Departmen{’s inspector genera]° refused 5o ~pecify for
reporters what he has asked government prosecutors to !ook at, but investigators have been
highly critical of the department’s management of ~he Reading First program.
Referrals are made by in’.,,estlgators wizen the;, e~,counter evidence of possible federal
crimes or other misconduct~ which only the Justice Department has authority to pursue.
A spokesman for ~.he U.S. attorney’s office for the District of Columbia, Chan~in~
Philiips: confirmed that the referral had been received by the department’s civil
division. When the civil division handles such referrals, nhe end res:~].t would usually be
a lawsuit seeking to recover funds rather than crimi~a], char~es being filed, he said,
alt.}:ougb it J.s possible that after review criminal action might be called for.
Reading First, cre~ted by President Bush’s signature No Child Left Behi:]d law, offers
int:ensi~.’e reading help for low-income :7.hildren in the early grades. But investigators say
that federal officials interv~.,ed to influence state and local deo.isions abcu-_ what
programs to use, a potential violation of the law. Some of the people who wer~ influencing
those decisions had a financial interest: in the programs that werc being pushed, officials
s.~id.
"’I think we’re very c].0se to a crimi2~al enterprise here,’’ House Educe=ion and Labor
Commit~.ee chairman George Miller, D-Calif., said at an investi~a:iv~ hearing Friday.
"’Have yo:J m~ade any criminal referrals, Mr. Higgins?’’
"’We have made referrals to the Department .~f Justice, ’’ Hiqgins said.
said his committee may also make criminal referrals. "’I think when ~..’e .n.:lt the
e-Tidence together ’^.e ~ay join you in those criminal referrals,’’ Miller told H~ggins.
But Reading First’s former director told lawmakers Friday he did nothing wrongr despite
investigators’ fir, dings that the Education Department skirted the law and ethica!
standards.
In scathing e~c}}anges with Miller, former Reading First program director Chris boherty
defended his and his colleagues’ work implementing the program.
"’You’ve suggested because of logistics, because {)f the time frame, becaus~ you might get.
50 mpp~lications all at the same time, you have a ~hele litany of reasons why you didn’t
have to abide by the law,’’ Miller said.
"’We thought then and we think now we did abide by the law,’’ replied Doherty, who stepped
down last year.
An inspector general report late ].ast year stated tha:z the readin._q program was beset by
conflicts of ~nterest and mismanagemer~t.
The inspector genera! stated that the review panels were stacked with people who shared
Doherty’s views and that Doheruy repeatedly ,/sed his influence to push s:ates toward
programs h-e favored.
"’Our work showed that the department did not comply with the Reading First statute
regarding the composition of the application review panel and criteria for acceptable
programs,’’ said John Higgins, the Ed~lcation Department’s inspector general. "’Further,
the department’s actions created an appearance that it may have violated statutory
provisions that prohibit it from influencing the curriculum of schools.’’
More recently, The Associated Press reported that th~ program may have yet another
conflict-of-interest problem. The Education Department contr~c<or hired to help set up ~d
implement key par~s of the Reading First program beginning in 2~02 also has been brought
in tm help evaluaze ho~q well the program is do±nq.
California Rep. Buck McKeon, the education panel’s senior Republican, has proposed a ban
on any contractor evaluating a program that it had a role in implementing. He and
Massachusetts Democrat E4ward Kennedy, who chai:s the Senate Educate.on Committee, are
pushing hills that would tighten conflict-of-interest rules in the reading program and
make it harder for federal ~fflcials or contractors to influence local curriculum
decisions.
’[he Education Department has pledged to make changes to ensure ther~ will not be future
problems in the Readiz]g ~’irst program.
Doherty suggested in prepared testimony that "’a distorted story’’ based on "’the worst
[~ossible interpretation of eyeless’’ h~s been told about the Read~ng First program.
"’We were never told on any occasion we were violating the law,’’ Doherty said at the
hearing.
Hot.~rs before the he.sting beg~n, the Educa~zi<~n Department released statistics showing
Reading First schosls saw improvement in reading fluency and comprehension for first amd
third graders between 2004 and 2006, But from th~ sta.rt, the program has been dogged by
accusations of impropriety.
[.ISA Today
10
WASHINGTON- The U.S. Ed1~cation Department’s insp÷ctor general, who spent nearly two
}’ears investigating allegations of mismanagement in President Bush’s $i billion-a-year
Reading First program, has referred the matter to the U.S. Justice Department.
It wasn’t immediately clear on Friday who the subject of the investigation might be, or
whether John Higgins, who led the Education Department’s investigation, asked Justice to
pursue criminal charges or a civil complaint.
But Rap. George Miller, D-Ca.[if., who chairs the Hous~ Rducation and Labor Co[~ittee and
is investigating the program on his own, t~..id Higgins: "I think whe~] we put the evidence
together we may join you in those criminal referrals."
Hiqgins’ revelation came during sworn testimony before the c0~.!~ittee. He wouldn’t
elaborate when pressed by reporters afterward, saying he couldn’t comment on an ongoing
investigation.
Re-~ding F~rsz, a centerpiece of Busb’s domestic agenda, aims to help low-income children
learn to read by the time they finish third grade. But mismanagement issues have plagued
it since its inception in 2002. Friday’s hearing focused on allegations that a select
group of advisors steered states toward buying textbooks and tests r_hat they and close
associates developed, and that department officials stacked revie~ panels with reviewers
partial to mat~.rials the administration favored.
In one case heard during Friday’s testimony, Kentucky officials had :o submit their
application four times before Reading First reviewers approved it --and only after
Kentucky agreed to dump a proven reading test and adopt one developed by a Reading First
advisor.
Higgins also found that federal officials jettisoned the program’s own rules for setting
up expert review panels, stacking several with Education Department f~vorites. They also
broke rules by having program staffers alter remarks mad~ by actual reviewers on state
applications for Reading First money.
Three Reading First advisors testified that they have earned six-figure royalties since
schools began receiwi.ng [unding under the program, One, Roland Good, a researcher at the
University of Oregon, said his testing eo~[pany, in which ha holds a 50% share, earned
$1,291,333 from 2003-2006.
Two others, Deborah Simmons, a researcher at Texas A&M, and Edward Kame’en~i, a University
of Ore.gcn researcher, said they earned about $150,000 last year from royalties on a
popular textbook series for young readers.
The revelations prompted Miller to quip, "That sounds like an inside job."
But the program’s former di.--~ctor0 Chris Doherty~ who testified that: be was essentially
forced to resJ..~n in September after the release of Higgins’ first report, on Friday
defe~-~ded the program, noting that several early evaluations have been positive -- and
suggesting the $I billion schools get each year has made a huge difference.
Doberty said the conflict revulves around "an undeniable, underlying :ension" that forces
officials to ensure that s.xhc.ols are using scientifically-based readi~g materials, but
prohibits the officials from prescribing a specific curricui,,m,.
"I can only basically restate that T’m very proud of the progra,.:i," r]oherty sd~d in an
interview afteiT the hearing. "I’m very proud of my [’ole in it. I feel like I implanted the
la~.; in the ~.:ay it was written and the way i: was intended."
Outside of Washington, he said, Readinq b’irst has developed "a real sense of co~.:u~unizy and
family" amo,~g, schools an<i stBte administrators. The mismanagement al!eq~t.~o<s, he 5~id,
are "~bsolutely unrepresentative of the program as a whule."
ii
He added~ "I was invited down to talk to those guys -- I talked with them of my own free
will."
Officials with the Justice Department could not be reached Friday after the hearing, and
Education Department spckeswoman Katherine McLane said she couldn’t comment.
Cindy Cupp, a Savannah, Ga., ed~cator who saw Georgia schools overlook her i~omegrown
phonics program after Reading First reviewers refused tc fund schools who chose it, said
Friday’s hearing "exceeded my expectations."
She first complained abo~~t the oversight three and a ball years ago, she said.
"The fact that it took three and a half years to get here (is) a long tit,e, but I’m
pleased. I’m very pleased."
Bloomberg
The two other Cabinet me~ers are Secretary Michael Leavitt of the Depar~ment of Health
and Human Services and Education Secretary Margaret Speilings.
The president plans tO annonnce formation of the group tomorrow in his weekly radio
address. Departing fr’om pzactice, the White Ro~se allowed the news media to report the
~ppointments today imstead of waiting for the broadcast.
"’We can never fully understand what would cause a student to take the lives of 32
innocent people,’’ Bush said in hJ.s prepared radio remarks. He said he asked the thmee
Cabinet officials "’to provide the VJrgJ.nia Tech com~.unity with whatever assistance we can
and to participate in a review of the broader questions raised by this tragedy.’’
The president said the group, led by Lea~.,i.’..l., will travel around the country and consult
with educators, mental heal.it experts and state and local officia!s ab’.d then report back
to him. The White ~[ouse d.~.dn’: announce a deadline for the report.
FOX News
Saving ’Me Child Left Behind’ From Ttself Friday, April 20, 2C07 By Dan Lips
Conservative lawmakers on CppJtc] Hili have introduced a bill qha: would let states opt
sut of many of the ma_-_~ates imposed by the federal No Child Left Behind Act
Under the new approach, statas would be [r~e to use federal education funds as they see
fit, provided they maintain student testing to assess their progzess arid make the test
resu].zs publicly available.
So.me I’,]CLR supporters charge that the conservative plan would undermine accounnability.
Sandy Kress, a former Hush a._-tminist±ation education advJser, [.:.ro:ested: "R,=.p~.~blicans used
to stand for z-.[gor." and standards, but no money for education. Now they seem re’. be }or the
money, but no standards."
Hut a closer look sugges=s that the real threat to a¢¢c.untability and transparency in
12
publi¢?educa:ion is NCI,B itself. Indeed, the conservative opt-0ut plan to restore state-
level control may be the best option for salvaging accountability for parents and
taxpayers,
The law requires states to test Students annually and offers a menu of penalties fox-
schools that fail to show p~ogress on those exams. States must measure up against a
baseline that rises every year up to 2014, at which poin< el! students are expdcted to
score "proficient" on the tests.
States, howe~er, establish the content standards and p~sJsg thresholds of the tests
meaning there’s an incentive 2or states ~o lower testing standards to avoid federal
sanctions.
Some are doing this already. Though s~ates can use their own exams to assess performance
among all students, they must also administer the "~ational Assessment of Educational
Broqress" (NABP) to a sample of students. This makes it easy to compare prof£ciency rates
in reading and math as measured by the NAEP with what the states report using their
tests.
Not surprisingly, the comparison sometimes unveils a huge disparity, with Tennessee and
Oklahoma, for example, reporting high proficiency rates on their tests that aren’t matched
by a similar performance on the NAEP.
The simple conclusion: Some states are "dumbing down" ~heir exams to let more students
pass and more schools show ~adequate yearly progress" under NCLH.
Just imagine what parents in Illinois thought when they saw this recent headline in the
Chicago Tribune: ~’Making Grade Just Got Easier." The article reported that "a record
number of Illinois schools escaped federal No Child Left Behind sanctions this school
ymar, largely because of changes in how schools are judged and alterations that made state
achievement exams easier for students to pass."
For the education bureaucracy, it’s far more imperative to avoid bad pubi.icity and federal
sanctions -- whatever it takes -- than to offer honest, usmful performance assessments to
parents and taxpayers. That’s a serious indictment of federal innervention.
Consider what it mea~.s for the future. As we ap~.roach 2014, when all children are supposed
to reach proficiency under NCLS, state benchmarks wi!l rise, as will the incentive for
states to lower the bar to avoid penalties.
In some snares, 201% may arrive wizh all childrmn deciared "proficient" and no schools
labeled "in need of improvement." That may be a happy day for politicians, bur not for
parents who want to know whether their children are learning.
Everyone agrees that public schools should be held accountable. The zeal question is:
Accountable to whom?
~he answer is that schools should be accountable to those who can make a difference.
Ultimately, that’s parents, not politicians oz-b~reaucrats. But NCLB seeks ho make local
schools accountable to fede/al bureaucrats, even though Washington provides only about 8
percent of ~;hat is spent <~n local education.
Unlike hl~r~a~]crats, parents are not so concerned about whether ,.:ii public schools are
labeled "crofter.ant" by ~014. A third-qrader today will be in high school when that day
arrives. Wh~t parent.s waht to know n.sw is whether their children are m~kinq progress in
the classr’oem each day and each school ’_,,ear.
Ironically, the No Child Left 8ehind "opt-out" provision is the mcs[ promising way to
protect the goals of the ]sw: tc make public education truly transparent and accountable.
Testimony aileges mismanagement of federal reading program By Grog ?oppo, USA TODAY
Federal advisors mismanaged President Bush’s $i billion-a-year reading program and
profited from close ties to the Bush administration, according to testimony released
Thursday -- in one case repeatedly rejecting one state’s funding proposal until state
officials dumped a smccess£ul reading test and bought orle written by a top Bush advisor.
In the firs< of two expected hearings, scheduled for [~riday, House lawmakers will probe
alleged mismanag~m,=.nt of Bush’s $I billion-a-year Readin~ First program. The U.S.
Ed~cation Depa~tment’s inspector genera! found that early ~mplementation of the program ~
a key part of Bush’s 2002 No Cl~ild Left Behind education r~form ~ was plag~ed with
conflicts of interest on :he psrt of top advisors, several o~ whom are authors of reading
textboohs or tests; they also advised eta:as on i.~hat materfals to buy.
In her testimony, Lewis says it was only after more than a year’s worth of rewriting that
federal officials approved Kentucky’s Reading First grant -- and only after the state
agreed to drop a favored reading test in favor of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Literacy
Skills, or DIBZLS, whi.ch was developed by University of Cregon researcher Roland Good, who
served on a federa! committee that reviewed r~adinc tests. She also notes that one member
of a team ÷ssigned to help Kentucky with its proposal trained teachers to use DIBELS.
While printed copies of DIBELS are available free online, Lewis notes in her testimony,
they are ",~nwie]dy, difficult to use and don’t lend ther~sel,~es to "fast turnaround of
zes,lts." ::]...q Kent:.:cky purchased handhold computers that run D, IBELS sc.ftware -- paying a
contractor nearly S725,000 over the past three years for the tests alone. Good and another
Oregon researcher, Edward Za~,e’enui, helped develop the handhold system. Both are
scheduled to testify today.
Federal di$clcsur~: forms show-that in 2C0b, Kame’enui, now a top Bush administration
education ofglcial, earned berween $i00,00"_’ and $] million on royalties from reading
materials he developed.
Miller has ciL~d Ken[ucky pr0bi,_-.:ms as a model of how had.iy managed Reading First was in
its early st.~geS.
Education Secretary Margaret Zpeilin~s has already told lawmakers that she’s bringing more
ovcrsigh: to th~ program, and a few @valumtions have suggested Lhat schools are benefiting
from its materials and training.
£ut Friday’s hearing is expected to bring to light tohe extent -o which Good, Kame’enui and
::there profiqed from their association with :he program they helped develop.
The U.S. Education Deparu~.ent un Thursday released three-year test results for schools
participating in Reading Firstr saying the percentage of students whose reading skills
improved grew sharply. BI]~ department officials offered no comparable d~ta on schools that
did not use Reading First, saying that comparison is not expected until next year.
In the study from 2004 to 2006, the percentage of first-graders meeting or exceeding
proficiency standards on reading f]uency grew from 43% to 579. The percentage of third-
graders improving grew from 36% to 43%.
"We feel like these are very impressive gains," said ~anda Farris, a deputy assistant
secretary of education, who oversees the pfoqra[n_
But Far,is offered no. data on ssudents attending schools that don’t receive a portion of
the $1 billion Reading First annual grants, saying a comparison to schools outside the
program is "a litt].e bit of a difficult question to answer" because states use a variety
of tests to assess reading, even within grades.
Control group compariscns axe expected to be part of a larger Reading First evaluation due
out next year, Farris said.
Thursday’s data release brought a rebuke from Miller, who said his co~aittee asked the
Education Department for stare-by-state breakdowns of Reading Ei:r.st funding and
assessments on Feb. 27 ar, d again on March 29, with no reply until Wednesday.
He said much of the information he requested is the same as that now being released ~o the
media.
"It is inconceivable tO me that zhe department withheld the requested information from
committee investigators who have been conducting a formal Congressional inquiry," he said
in a letter to Spellings.
Miller asked Spellings to tell him whether department staff "deliberately withheld" the
information from the ¢om~:ittee and when the department "first possessed the informazion"
on t2]?es of reading assessments used by the states.
In a terse r~ply sent late Thursday, SDel]ing~ told ~4iller, "My staff has nor ,~ellberately
withheld any requested infurmation."
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired. of spare? Y:ahoo~. Mai! has the best spare protection around
Private, .Spe!~l.~i.n~ts, Margaret ......
From: kath~
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 5:58 AM
To: Dunckel, Denise; scott_m,_stanzel@who.eop.gov; Sampson, Vincent; Queries, Karen;
Bannerman, Kristin; Rosenfelt, Phil; Taylor, Jeff; Conaty, Joseph; Farris, Amanda; Beaten,
Meredith’, Briggs, Kerri; Ruberg, Casey; Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia; I~unn, David;
Dorfman, Cynthia; Evers, Bill; Kuzmich, Holly; La Force, Hudson; Lenders, Angels; Katie
MacGuidwin; Maddox, Lauren; Private - Spellings, Margaret; McGrath, John; Mesecar, Doug;
Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; rob Saliterman; Yudof, Samara; Scheessele, Marc; Hafaska,
Ter~elf; Toner, Jane; Mcnitt, Townsend L; Young, Tracy; Ditto, Trey; Tucker, Sara Madinez;
Zeff, Ken
Subject: F~om At Kamen’s WP cotumn
Rep. George Miller" (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, wasn’t
pleased to find that the Department of Ed~ication waited until this week to provide data
first reported yesterday in Th.=. washington Post -- that showed a $1-billion-a-year reading
program is helpi.r:g kids. Miller shot off an a~gry letter to Education Sect’etary Margaret
Spellings saying that his office, probing cromyism and mismanagem~=nt in the Reading First
program, had asked for the info two mc.nths ago but never ~et
The department tells ..’~ur colleague ££~.it R. ~aley that it doesn’t know what Miller is
talking about and has complied with his requests. Stay t~ned.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spare? Yghoo! Mail has the best spare protection around http:iimail.yahoo,com
,private - Spellin@s, M,~rgaret mnnnnnnn
Reading First Paying Off, Education Dept. Says By Amit R. Paley Washington Post Staff
Writer Thursday, April 19, 2007; AI9
The Reading First program, a central, part of the No Child Left Behind la~;, has been
criticized by congressional Democrats who say it has been riddled with confliczs of
interests and mismanageme~to The House education committee is holding an oversight hearing
on the m~ter Friday.
The data, scheduled to be released today, indicate that students have benefited from the
program, which provides grants to improve reading in kindergarten through third grade.
"That’s the irony," said Jebm, ~. Jennings, president of the Can[or cn Edl]cation Policy.
"The program was poorly -- even unethically -- ad~..~inistered at the federal level, yet it
seems to be having a positive effect in schools."
A department o~ficial said the data show %.hat the n:ambex ef students in R~ading [ir~t
program~ who were proficient on fluency tests increased en average over the past five
years by 16 p~rcent for first-graders,
14 percenz for second-graders and ]5 percent for ~hird-gradezs. On comprehension tests, it
increased 15 percent for first-graders, 6 percent For second-graders end 12 percent for
third-graders. The offisial said the analysis is based on results from 16 states that bare
the most complete data.
"The ~esults show that Reading First is an extremely effective program that is helping our
nation’s neediest students get the skills they need to read,"
ssid .Amanda Farris, e deputy assistant education secretary who oversees the program.
Critics said the res.ults were nor so impressive, considering how much money has been spent
on the program. They said the tesz scow’as are meaningless because uhey are not compared
with the performanue of other students, who nationwide are doing better ~n reading.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spare? Yahoo! M:~] I. has the best sp.~m DroLection around http://msi!.y.-zhoc.com
~rivate~_- _Spelling s, Mar~laret ...... :
From: Neale, Rebecca
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 9:34 AM
To: Benton, t~leredith; Briggs, Kerri; Williams, Cynthia; Colby, Chad; Ditto, Trey; Derfman, Cynthia;
Dunn, David; Evers, Bill; Flowers, Sarah; Gribble, Emily; Halaska, Terrell; Herr, John;
Kuzmich, Holly; Lenders, Angola; Maddo×, Lauren; Private - Spellings, Margaret; McGrath,
John; McLane, Katherine; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Mesecar, Doug; Neale, Rebecca; Pitts,
Elizabeth; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Scheessele, Marc; Tada, Wendy; Talbert, Kent;
Terrell, Juiie; Toomey, Liam; Tracy Young (E-mail): Tucker, Sara Martinez; Young, Tracy;
Yudof, Samara; Zeff, Ken
Subject: William I~cKenzie: Bipartisan Wins Amid Partisan Riffs? (DMN)
"The purpose of Beading First is %0 help schoolchildren learn to read, not feather the
nests of a select group cf well-connected ind{~-iduals and ~rganizations," says R~p. <~orge
Miller, D-Calif., who. chairs the House Co~,~.littee on ~’.ducation and Labor.
Miller and Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., are conducting probes. Kennedy plans hearings
later this spring.
Miller wil! preside at the first he~ring Friday, which brings togethea- Chris Doherty, the
program’s former dire:-:tor, and three top advisers,
Atop the wizness list: John Higgins, the Zducation Department’s inspector general, who has
issued six reports detaili,~g how Reading First leaders and contractors looked the other
way at possible conflicts cf interest among advisers and o:hers -- several of whom
authored textbooks. He alsn found that D0her<y and others strong-armed states and school
districts into choosing from a small selection cf materials that stress phonics.
In one e-mail Higgins cited, boherty said of a publisher whose books downpleyed phonics,
"They are trying to crash our party, and we need :o beat the
(expletive} out of them in front of .all the other would-be party (:rashers who ~re standing
on the front lawn w~Jting to see how we welcome these dirtbags."
Higgins also found that a 2002 conference for educators focused too ex:::lusiveiy on a few
programs, creatin,~ what investiga-.’cxs said was a per~:eprion that there was an "approved
list" of texts.
A related probe last month by the Governmen= Acrx}untability Office fonnd that officials
from i0 s~ates complained that the Educatit.n Department told them re eliminate reading
programs or tests that th~.y didn’t endorse. Federal rul~s prohibit [.he department from
endorsir~g any c[~rr~cul~m.
Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, who until 2005 was a WhiL~ Hollse domestic policy
adviser, says the troubles occurred before her move to the Education Department, But Mike
~etrilli, ~ former associat~ deputy secretary under Spellings’ predecessor, Rod Paige,
says Spellings "micromanaged the implementation of Reading First from her West Wing
office." She already has told lawmakers she is beefing up oversight of the program.
But even a few critics cautious±y concede that the program has been a boon to schools. The
Center on Education Policy, a Washington think tank that has criticized Bush’s education
progra~, in September said ~eading First is having "a sign±ficant impaut" in schools.
A five-year, $30.5 million evaluation, begun in 2003, should produce complete results next
year.
Cindy Cupp, a Savannah, Ga., educator, was among the first to complain in 2005, after
Reading First schools in Ge0r~ia passed over her homegrown pho~.£cs program.
Cupp compiled a huge dossier outlining the links between publishers, federal advisers,
universities and the Bush admin~.s-~ration. In findings issued last January, Higgins largely
upheld her
She says it’s irrelevant whether Remding First works:
"To rationalize breaking the law hy s~ying the program has been effective is just that
a r~tionalization."
She also notes that part of the evaluation bid went to BMC Research Corp., which Higgins
cited for turning a blind eye to conflicts of interest among three top advisers it hired.
All three are scheduled to tes<ify Friday.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mall has ~he best spam protection aro~/nd http://mail.¥ahoo.com
Private - Spelling, s, Margaret
From: McLane, Katherine
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 8:31 AM
To: Private -Spellings, Margaret; Conaty, Joseph; Farris, Amanda; Lenders, Angola; Evers, BEll;
Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia; Dorfrnan, Cynthia; Mesecar, Doug; Dunn, David; Pitts,
Elizabeth; Flowers, Sarah; McGrath, John: Talbert, Kent; Briggs, Kerri; Kuzmich, Holly;
Toomey, Liam; Maddox, Lauren; Scheesseie, Marc; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Beaton, Meredith;
Tucker, Sara Martinez; Tada, Wendy; Halaska, Terrell; Tracy WH; Young, Tracy; Zeff, Ken;
Quarles, Karen; Bannerman, Kristin; Watkins, Tiffany; Sampson, vincent
Ditto, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: With subpoena, witness list reveals RF hearing focus (Education Daily)
The G.A.O., the investigative arm of Congress, surveyed education officials across the nation about
Reading First, which awards $1 billion a year in grants to states to buy texls omd curriculums. According
to the report, 69 percent of those surveyed praised the program for "great or very great improvement in
reading instruction.’" About 80 percent said the program had vastly improved teacher training.
The a’eport also found that most states were satisfied with the help they had received f~om lbderat
officials and private contractors in applying for grants.
But the accountability, office, echoing criticism in a series of reports by the Educmion Department’s
inspector general, found that department officials m~d private contractors might have broken the taw in
either steering 14 states toward specific reading programs or advising them not to use others. Those
states were not identified in the report.
The law authorizing Reading First requires that grants go only to districts using reading approaches
backed by scientific research. I1 prohibits Education Department officials from promoting, or even
endorsing, specific curriculums.
4t22/2008
Page 2 of 10
The reports from the inspector general also found that federal officials had overlooked conflicts of
interest among contractors advising states applying for grants, and that in some instances, contractors
had had a financial stake in programs competing for the money.
The report by the accolmtability office found that of 3,400 districts eligible for Reading First, 2, 100
applied for grants, and 1,200 are receiving them. In most states, officials gave the program high marks
Ibr improving the way reading was taught.
States reported that teachers were working more syslematically to build children’s skills in phonies,
reading filoud, vocabulary and comprehension, and that schools were devoting more time to reading,
typically 90 minules or more a day.
addition, al! states said prol~ssionaI development of teachers had improved under the program.
Reading First has come under heavy fire in Congress m~d elsewhere. Previous audils of the program, mad
some local school officials, said the department had used the law to promote reading programs with a
heavy reliance on phonics, which focuses on the mechanics of sounding out syllables, rather than
methods emphasizing additional strategies for making sense of texts. The House and the Senate are
planning hearings.
The G.A.O. report incorporated reconunendations from the earlier inspector general reports that the
Education Department should guard against conflicts of interest in administering the proga’am.
In a response attached to the report, the deputy secretary &education, R~’mond Simon, wrote that the
depamnent agreed with its recommendations.
While her students at Blake High School prepare for an Advanced Placement exam that measures
whether they know college-level world history, Saroja Ringo is being asked to prove she knows how
teach ik
The College Board, publisher of college-preparatory extorts, is auditing ever3’ Advanced Placement
course in the nation, asking teachers of an estirna*ed 130,000 AP courses to furnis1~ written proof by
June I that the courses they teach are worthy of the brand.
An explosiort in AP study -- participation in the program has nearly doubled this decade -- has bred
worD’, particularly among college leaders, of a decline in the rigor for which the courses are "hmwn.
Once the exclusive province of elite students at select high schools, AP study or its equivalenl is now
more or less expected of any s~udent who aspires to attend even a marginNly selective college.
In ~he haste to remain competitive in the AP arms race, schools somelimes award the designation to
courses that barely resemble the college curriculum the program is meant to deliver, according to
College Board officials and educators. Until now, there has been no large-scale effort to weed out such
abuse.
"Anybody could .just say, ’I’m teaching an AP course; I’m an AP teacher. There’s n~ protocol,’ " said
4/22/2008
Page 3 of 10
Ringo, who teaches AP World ttistory at the Silver Spring school and works as an official grader of the
Beginning with the 2007-08 academic year, only teachers whose syllabuses have been approved by the
College Board may call their courses AP. Each teacher must submit an audit form, along with a syllabus
fol’ the course he or she teaches. Depending on how well the teacher’s syllabus -- assuming he or she has
one - reflects the rigor expected by the CoIlege Board, the process can be brief or time*consuming.
The task has been met with no small amount of grumbling. Montgomery County teachers loosed an
angry volley of e-mails oyez the exercise, mostly along the lines of "Why me?" and "Why now?" But
many faculty begrudgingly accept that some quality control is needed, lest the AP program spiral ou~ of
control.
"I thit~ the teache~s are sympathetic in hindsight," said Stephanie Valentine, who oversees the program
at Springbrook High in Silver Spring. "Not while they’re doing it."
The implications for high schools and colleges, students and teachers are enormous.
One woutd be a probable decline -- after years of double-digit growth -- in the number of courses
labeled Advanced Placement. College Board officials have set a goal of approving at least 105,000 AP
courses, of an estimated 130,000 nationwide. The attrition, they predict, would come mainly from
teachers who decline to participate. No school will be restricted from giving the exams, although
students without adequate preparation are malikely to take them.
Tom Matts~ a College 13oard official who oversees the audit, said its purpose is to help leachers elevate
their courses.
"We’re not trying to eliminate any courses," he said, "but to help teachers understand M~at needs to be in
the course and to provide evidence in the syllabus" that college-level material is being taught.
Since its 3an, 23 launch, the audit has drawn submissions fi’om 55,000 teachers, Malts said_ University
professors review the courses and usually respond within two months. Sevcnt3’-four percent of courses
have been approved to date. Unsuccessful teachers are encouraged to resubmit up to three times, with
guidance li-om the College Board. Once approved, teachers and their syllabuses ~e sanctioned until they
move Io another school or the course requirements change.
Wendy Bo~relli, who has taught AP Literature and Composition at Springbrook High for two years,
earned approval on her first Ix3.’. She completed the audit in a day and submitted it the first week the
College Board would take it.
"The bulk of what I sent them was the real syllabus that I give my students each semester," Borrelli said.
She concedes that the audit would be more work "if you weren’t the kind of organized or, shall I say,
ana!-retentive teacher that I am."
For college admissions officers, the audit might assuage rising doubts abou~ the value of the AP stamp
on an applicant’s transcript. They, more than any other group, pushed for the review: driven by the steep
increase in applicants claiming an AP pedigree.
"Is it possible to expand these courses as fast as they have and maintain their quality?" asked Andrew
Flagel. dean of admissions at George Mason University in Fairfax County. "Anecdotatly, what we’re
hearing t~om people is that that’s a huge challenge: that the classes have gotten significantly larger and
4/22/2008
Page 4 of I0
that the push to get so many people into [them] has led to a tendency or a temptation to lower the rigor
of the course."
Marts said college officials nationwide were "curious to know what has happened to fl’re curriculum
when we’re seeing a 150 percenl increase in lhe number of students t’~ng these classes over the past l 0
years." He cited well-traveled anecdotes about schools that "simply make up courses and call them AP."
Although fast-growing AP programs in the Alexandria, Fairfax, Momgomery and Arlington County
systems retain a uniformly high caliber, veteran teachers there say, they have seen or heard of scofflaws
elsewhere. In a typical scenario, a school co~nbines disparate groups of honors and AP students into a
vaguely defined AP course without intending to teach the advanced curriculum or to prepare students for
lhe end-of-course exam.
"Yhey’lt cal! it AP, but you end up with two of 26 kids taking the AP test," said Mel Riddile, principal of
T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria. "Is that really an AP course?"
Studentg might have the most at stake. An aspiring pro-meal student might learn in the fall that the AP
biology cottrse on her high school schedule has been downgraded to the more generic "honors." This, in
tttn~, could affect what she is tauglat in the class and her chances for taking, let alone passing, the prized
AP biology exam, a galeway to college credit and advanced standing. (Taking an AP course by itself is
not enough to earn college credit; a student must take and score well on the corresponding extort.)
Also at stake might be the prestige factor of the course on a high school trtmscript and the potential for
lost bonus points awarded for AP stttdy, with a corresponding effect on c]ass rank.
Some teachers remain skeptical of the audit: What’s to stop lazy, AP teachers from copying artother
teacher’s syllabus and passing it off as their own? Who will ensure tt~at lesson plans approved by the
College Board will actually be taught?
Supporters of the a~dit effort, however, say it’s a step in the tight direction.
The mean AP exam score dipped from 3.01 in May 2000 to 2.89 in May 2006, on a five-point scale, a
modest erosion in a span of years when the number of exams taken doubled to 2 million.
Of greater concern lhan the scores - to critics, at least -- is the growing number of AP students who
never take the exam.
Marts, of the College Board, contends that "sludents benefit even without the exam."
"What’s the only way you can assure that’s an AP course?" he said. "That’s that the student in that ~ourse
took the AP assessment, and here’s their score."
CHICAGO - To motivate juniors on last April’s assessment exams, Springfield High School ofli~r~d
coveted lockers, parking spaces near ~he door and free prom tickets as incentives for good scores.
4/22/2008
Page 5 of I0
But the incentives at the central Illinois school went mMaimed m~til earlier this month, when Illinois
finally published its 2006 test scores - more than fore" n~onths after they were due.
Critics pounced on tlaxcourt Assessment lnc., which lost most of its $44.5 million state contract over
delays - caused by everything from shipping problems to messing test pages and scoring errors -that
made illinois the last slale in the nation to release scores used to judge schools trader the federal No
Child Left Behind Act.
But experts say problems are more widespread, and poised to get worse. A handful of companies create,
print and score most of the tests in the U.S., and they’re straggling with a workload that has exploded
since President Bush signed the five-year-old education reform package.
The testing, industry in *he U.S. is bt~ckling under the weight of NCLB demands," said Thomas Toch,
co-director of Education Sector, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank.
When Education Sector surveyed 23 states-in 2006, it found that 35 percent of testing offices in those
states have experienced "significant" erro,s with scoring and 20 percent didn’t get results "in a timely
fashion."
Illinois saw more problems this month, when students took achievement tests that contained as many as
13 errors, officials said. But lllinois isn’t fl~e only state that’s experienced difficulties:
Connecticut last year fined its testing company $80,000 after a processing error caused wrong scores
~or 355 students on the 2005 test. Tide problem came a year after the state canceled its contract with
another company after scoring problems caused a five-monlh delay in reporting scores.
The Texas Education Agency passed 4,160 10th-graders who initially failed the math section of the
~exas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills in 2003 after officials discovered a test question had more
than one correct answer.
_Michigan Educational Assessment Program results were delayed Iast year, and there were previous
problems under another contractor. In 2003, 3,400 MEAP scores were delivered months late and nearly
1,000 results went missing.
_Alabama education offieia]s said a testing company mistakenly failed some schools while passing
others that should have t~iled, after scoring problems on fl~e 2005 assessment test.
_In Oregon, the state Education Departmenl complained that a computerized state assessment test was
pIagued by system problems. The testing company later terminated its contract WJ|llt ~he state, claiming it
was owed back payments, and the sta~e sued the company for breach of contract. Now, thousands of
students who haven’t completed online exams will take them in lvlay using paper and pencil.
Causes of the problems are multipronged, testing company and education experts say.
The number of studenls being lested has rgsen sharply since the No Child Left Behind Act took eft’eel.
Illinois: for exaJnple, used to test only third, fifth and eight graders but now tests students in third
through eighth grades.
To meet NCLB requirements, states administered 45 million exams by spring 2006, and the number
keeps rising. By the end of the 2007-2008 school year, il will reach about 56 million tests.
,ti22i2008
Page 6 of 10
What’s more, each state has its own test, and many want them customized, said Michael Hanson, chief
executive officer of Harcourt Assessment, which no longer administers illinois’ tests but still is involved
in developing and grading them. Before NCLB was signed into law, states used exams like the Stanford
Achievement Test, and publishers created new tests every six to eight years.
"Not orgy (have) s~ates wanted different content in terms of tlie tests, but they also have very mmay
different requirements as to logistics, detiveD,, look mad feel, color, how the questions are organized,
horizontal, vertical ... you name it, it was on the table," Hanson said.
"That means March and April we are completely ... at peak capacity and so is every one of our
competitors," Hm~sen said. "But also then when the tes! results come in, they (schools) need the test
results hack as soon as possible ... so the tmnaround from the time that the test is taken, to (when) we
need Io report the results is extremely till and it’s getting ~ighter mid tighter."
The NCLB testing industry is dominated by four companies: San Antonio, Texas-based Harcourt;
Monterey, Calif.-based CTWMcGraw-Hi!I; Iowa City, Iowa-based Pearson Educational Measurement
and Itasca, Ill.-based Riverside Publishing.
"It’s not entirely a monopoly, but it is an oligopoly,, ~4th vein little regulation," said Walter Hanev,
professor at the Center for the Study of Testing E~ aluation mid Educational Policy at Boston Coliege.
Both state education departments and testing companies are "overtaxed and bursting at the seams," said
Becky Watts, former chief of staff at the Illinois State Board of Education.
"it’s logical. Any time ym~ have a relatively small industD’ ... it’s a tall order. What is demanded of the
testing industry,’, what is demanded of the states~ it’s huge," Watts said.
Bet~veen 2002 and 2008, states will spend between $1.9 billion and $5.3 billion to develop, score and
report NCLB-required tests, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office. Ultimately,
the price tag depends on ~vhether slates prefer exams with open-ended ques|ions - which are hand-scored
and more costly - or multiple-choice questions.
But it’s a mistake to blame only the vendors for the problems when lawmakers are notorious misers in
funding state testing agencies, said TocK from Education Sector.
States spend lcss than a quarter of I percent of school revenue - or between $10 to $30 a student - on
testing programs, even though fbderal, state and local spending per pupil adds up ~o more fi~an $8,000 a
year, Toch said.
"That’s not enough to produce high-quality tests in the tight timelines that NCLB requires. It’s
ludicrous," Toch said.
The Office of Inspector General at the U.S. Department of Education said last year it would study
whether high-stakes tests need federal oversight. The office has not begun working on the study, but
officials hoped ~o do so this year, said spokeswoman Catherine Granl.
4/22/2008
Page 7 of 10
Last year, Congress gave states $408 million to develop standardized testing under NCLB, but the slates
can use the money in lots of ways, and many of them use it for tasks unrelated to test-building, Toch
said.
"Instead, Secretary (Margaret) Spellings has largely washed her hands of this problem, said it’s a state
problem, which is a peculiar ... response because it’s the federal government that has required the states
to take these actions," Toch said.
EDITOR’S NOTE _ It’s one of the bandamental challenge s for colleges in the 21 st century: how to make
higher education ser~,e a growing and diversi~-ing population wilhout compromising quality.
Universities are being catled on to do more for the best and brightest, but also to help more people get a
bachelor’s degree in a professional world where a college education is vital.
TEMPE, Arizona (AP) _ Like the state it serves, Arizona State University is big, bustling and
relentIessly new.
If colleges were countries, most would resemble the developed nations of the West stable, working to
improve but thronging onIy gradually m~d growing slowly, if at all. Arizona State w~’uld be China. Its
campuses are giant construction sites. New schools and programs spring up nearly e~’ery week.
Hundreds of facul~" are being hired, thousands of dorm rooms are being built.
There are 280 undergraduate n~ajors, three sepayate schools of business, 32 on-campus dining options,
and 601 student clubs.
ASU is a city in itsel£ With 51,000 students on the main campus, plus 10,000 more at three branches
around Phoenix, il is already among the largest traditional universities in the United States. But tmlike
any CUl:rent rivals [br that title, ASU plazas ~o keep growing _ to abo~t 90,000 students over the next
decade. That would make it easily the largest university of its kind in America.
Michael Crow, ASU s pre.~dent, calls his school the "new American m~iversity" m~d sees it as the
university of the future.
It’s a model that takes on b,x,o chNlenges some see as conflicting: to be a great university, and to be an
enormous one, with its doors open to a huge number of students with widely varying abilities.
Arizona: Crow says, needs ASU to be a grea universib’, with top-tier researchers solving pressing local
problems like water resource management. But it also urgently needs to expand access to four-year
college degrees. The slate’s population is growing and diversifying, with a half-dozen new higli schools
opening each year. But there are just ~ree public universities to accommodate the growlh.
"’This is a university on the front line of dealing wifl~ a ,~0) million-person America going to a 450-
million person ,~nerica," Crow says.
Schools in Mexico, Emope and Asia ha-v-e enrolled 100,000 students or more, but traditional American
4/22/2008
Page 8 of 10
ones have topped out at around 50,000, excluding multi-campus state systems and for-profit chains such
as the University of Phoenix. Most have preserved a flagship campus for the strongest students and
channeled grov~th elsewhere.
Crow doesn’t believe quality has to suffer when a university scales up to this size.
"’in higher ed, that’s what p~ople think is needed: io create this very grand school for the best, and give
ever),’body else generic campuses:" Crow says, "’ We’re like, ’Why?’"
And so, ASU is a place of extraordinary variety. There is a l~rowing roster of high-profile faculty doing
cutting-edge research, working ’alongside insmtctors in more vocational programs like goIf-course
management. There’s an elite honors college for exceptional sludents, but it’s set within the larger
university that accepts 92 percent o fits applicants.
Some critics says it’s a lkntasy to think a u~versity can simply ignore the t-inanity-vs.-quality lradeoff.
"’ASU will very clearly get worse: much worse, not better, so long as they keep driving the enrollment,"
says Geoffrey Clark, an anthropology prot~ssor and 35-year faculty veleran. He says the m~versity is
overcrowded and has sold it soul for corporate sponsorship. ASU could have became a distinguished
public research university, like University of California, .Los Angeles, h~ says; instead Crow has turned it
into just another slate eoIlege.
"’The new" American uni’~’ersity in my opinion is a fraud," Clark says. "You can’t get big and good at the
stone time."
But even skeptics say that, if anyone can pull it off, it’s Crow.
After holding seniur administrative jobs at Iowa State University and Cohunbia University, Crow came
to ASU in 2002 and has been bus5’ since _ building, recruiting, fundraising and lobbying, mad generally
kicking up the desert dust.
There’s a massive new campus in downtown Phoenix. Eight news schools within the ~m~iversib: have
opened in the current academic year alone. There’s a new Biodesign Institute that went from idea to
funclioning laborato~~ with 500 workers in just a few" years _ a pace unimaginable at many universities.
Crow has raised ASU’s p~’ofile substantia!ly with donors, voters, the legislature and the regents, who
have Forked over new money and freedom to a school that traditionally has played second fiddle to the
University of Arizona in Tucson.
He’s also brought in some top-shelftalem __ a business school dean from Wharlon business school, a top
fundraiser from Harvard. Wellington Ratter, the dean of the College of Design, said he was drawl~ by
"the chance of making a difference 0’4 a scale that was inconceivable in a place like IV[IT," where he
was a professor.
AS(.! has a strong record luring top students, too. Test scores are rising. ]’hcy are lured with sunshine
alld access to the small classes oflhe Barrett Honors College. And they’re lured with money.
Of the cash ASU awards as financial aid, nearly 80 percent is given on the ]oasis of merit _ much of it for
out-of-stale sludents with good grades.
"Arier visiting MII and tIarvard I just felt like a number," said Car), Anderson, a junior fi-om Apple
4/22/2008
Page 9 of t 0
Valley-, Minnesota. "’Then I found out I can go here for nothing _ actually get paid to go to school."
Three personal phone calls from the dean sealed the deal.
Ambitious universities like ASU have faced criticism for spending too much money to attract bright
students who improve a college’s academic ranking, but don’t necessarily need the money to attend
college. Rankings are clearly importaaat at ASU: In an unusual arrangeme~t, Crow’s contract includes a
$10,000 (euro7,490) incentive for boosting ASL!’s standing in U.S. News & World Report magazine’s
ra.nkings of the top U.S. schools.
But Crow says recruiting top students impsores the intellectual atmosphere on campus _ and that ASU
is still backing up its commitment to widen the gate. Abou! two-thirds of ASU’s financial aid, even if it’s
awarded for merit, goes to students with need. The number of students from the poorest families has
increased by about 500 percent since 2002 while the number of black, native American and Hispanic
students have all more thm3 doubled over the last decade.
ASU’s graduation rate is also improving, though still a problem. Only 56 percent of freshmen entering in
2000 had a degree by 2006. Rates for Hispanics (51 percent) and Native Americans (23 percent) are
lower still.
One of the key factors in strong graduaiion rates is close attention from faculty. That’s a chalIenge hm’e.
ASU’s student-faculty ratio is 22-1, and even then only 63 percent of faculty are tenured or tenure-track;
the others are lecturers, instructors and adjuncts.. Overall spending per student is low, largely becmlse
ASU has received comparativety little state support.
In the School of Life Sciences, Professor Ronald Rutowski says faculty are trying to give the 1,000 or so
majors, plus students from outside the department, an engaging experience in d~e classroom. But
capacity, is crmmhed, with classes and labs oversubscribed and lecture hails in short supply.
"’We’re trying," he says. But "’there’s no question the demand fga exceeds what we’re able to oiler at this
poinl."
Honors college students get more pampered treatment and praise the ASU experience. Still, some say
they have concerns about the scale of growth.
Adding 30,000 students is "’too much," said senior Taylor Jackson, a senior from Haitiesburg, Miss. "’1
won3, the money’ will become even thim~er and the class sizes ,,,,ill become even larger."
(’,row says ASU plans to hire 500 more faculty above the enrollment grma-lh rate i~ the coming years,
which would improve its ratios. It also plans to add 6,000 new dormitoD, beds over ttzree years; Crow
guesses $I billion (euro750 million) worth of new residence halls are in the works. Students who live
on-campus are g’picatly more successful, so that could improve the graduation rate.
But there will still be thousands of students who have to commute, and are inevitably less connected to
the university.
"’1 wish I could be in the band and the Ctzristian Bible groups here but I just don’t have time for it," said
Tim White, a geography major from nearby Glendale who commutes from home on Mondays and
Wednesdays. He calls ASU "’satisfactou" but says he doesn’t really feel like part ofa communi~.
Crow says his goal is to build a great universitT, where greatness rubs otT on and inspires students in
4/22/2008
Page 10 of !0
every comer of the institution_ and he insists ASU is o~ its way to makir)g that happen.
Still, some critics maintain ASU is growing too tiast, doing too many lhings but none of them well
enough.
"’We’re increasingly relying on part-timers, contract Nculty, grad students, adjm~cts," says Clark, tile
anthropology professor. "’And yet we’re ratcheting up tuition," which costs $4,690 (euro3,510) for in-
state studertts this year.
"’ASU students, or a good chunk of them, are going to be paying (four-yore’) university tuition and
they’ll be getting a (two-year) community coltege education for it."
4122/2008
, Private - Spell,,!ngs, ,Mar~laret
From: McLane, Katherine
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:12 AM
To: Private - Spellings, Margaret; Farris, Amanda; Conaty, Joseph; Landers, Angola; Evers, Bill;
Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia; Dortman, Cynthia; Mesecar, Doug; Dunn, David; Pitts,
Elizabeth; Flowers, Sarah; McGrath, John; Talbert, Kent; Briggs, Kerri; Kuzmich, Holly;
Toomey, Liam; Maddox, Lauren; Scheessele, Marc; Mcnitt, Townsend L; Beaton, Meredith;
Tucker, Sara Martinez; Simon, Ray; Tada, Wendy; Halaska, Terrell; Tracy WH; Young, Tracy;
Ze[f, Ken
(~c: Ditto, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terretl, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Report finds Education Department improperly backed aspects of reading program {AP)
By NANCY ZUCKERBROD
The Associated Press
Friday, March 23, 20077
Yhe Government Accountability Office report supports assertions by the inspector general
~f the Education Department, wh@ has rmleased severa! reports in rec~nt months into the
Reading First program.
The px’ogram is a key part of the 2002 No Child Le[t Behind law. It offers intensive
reading he.[p for low-income and struggling schools.
The GAO, Coneress’.. investigative and auditing arm, surveyed
the program.
In a report due out Friday and obtained by The Associazed Fress, the GAO states that so~e
states said the}, received suggestions from federal officials er conLractors tO adopt or
eliminate cerzain programs or tests.
Federal law prohibits the departme[~t from requiring cert,5in curricula or directing states
to use specific programs.
Officials "may have violated the statutory prohibition against mandating or directing
loca! :~urricular decisions by effectively endorsing or directing the ~se_~tlon
..... * of
particular Reading First programs," the SAO said.
In i0 states, officials said they received suggestions to get rid of certain programs or
tests, according to the report. And officials in four states said they received
suggestions to adopt specific programs or tssts, the GAO said. The repurt did not name the
An inspector general report released late last year stated that the reading pro.~ram was
beset by conflicts of interest and m[smanagemenz. It found that people who had clear
conflicts of interest due to their ind:lstry connections were able to serve as grant
reviewers under the p.~ogram.
The inspecLor general stgted that the review panels were st.=_cked ;’;ith people who shared
.<he views of tho former program director, Chris Doherty. The report state.:J th.~t Doherty
repeatedly use~ his influence to steer money toward states that used a readJnj approach he
favored, called Direct Instruction.
The GAO rep{~rts that state officials b~lieve reading ~nstruction has improved under the
federal pxoqram due partly t.c- ~.he increased tocu~ :t placed on reading efforts.
Deputy Education Secretary [{ay Simo~ wrote .~n a respons~ to the GAO report [.hat the
departme~t would Fake steps to avoid future problem, s.
"we will provide wri:ten guidance in the near future to all d~partment staff reminding
them of the importance of impartiality in the performance of their dnties and not
construing progra~ s<atutes to authorize the department to mandate, direct or control
curricul~mm and instruction, except to the extent authorized by law," he wrote.
The No Child Left Behind law is scheduled to be rewritten this year, and there has been
some speculation on Cap~.tol Hill as to whether the reading program will be renewed.
The two lawmakers in charge off the committees that oversee educatio~ issues say hearings
into Reading First are likely.
"We must continue to investigate how Reading First was implemented to learn from past
mistakes and prevent future abuses," said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., the chairman of
the Ho~se committee.
"The GAO report confirms th.~ the department failed to ta~e appropriate steps to give
states clear guidance and impartia! assistance in i~iplementing Reading First. Our students
and teachers deserve better~ " said Sen. Edward hi. Kennedy, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate
committee.
From: Neale, Rebecca
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 9:05 AM
To; Beaten, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Car!clio, Dennis; Colby, Chad; Di~o, Trey; Dunn, David;
Flowers, Sarah; Halaska, Terrell; Herr, John; Kuzmich, Holly; Landers, Angela; Maddox,
Lauren; Private - Spellings, Margaret; McLane, Katherine; Mcnitt, Townsend L.: Neale,
Rebecca; Pitts, Elizabeth; Reich, He]d!; Rosenfelt, Phil; Ruberg, Casey; Scheessele, Marc;
Simon, Ray: Tada, Wendy; Talbert, Kent; Terrell, Julie; Toomey, [Jam; t:racy_d.
_young@who.eop.gov; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Williams, Cynthia; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Young Readers Reap Benefits (PNT NM)
"Schools have already chosen their reading programs, and Spellings’ revisions have come too late to help, Still, Reading Firsfs
shortcomings and conflicts illustrale some of the reasons Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act is a poody crafted law that should not
be renewed in its current form.~
Editorial: Accountability First (LVS NV)
Las Vegas Sun, March 17, 2007
Bush’s Reading First program shows problems of No Child Left Behind Act
The Bush administration’s Reading First literacy program for schools serving children from low-income families has been
previously criticized by federal auditors and also came under fire in Congress this week as lawmakers discussed reauthodzation
of the program’s fur~ding.
Reading First, which is at the heart of Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act that is up for renewal, dedicates $1 billion a year I:o
seeking out scientifically proved, research-based programs for improving reading education. The money pays for teacher training
and materials to be used in schools that serve low-income families.
But audits by the Education Department’s inspector general show that Reading First has been riddled with mismanagement
and conflicts of interest, pushing lucrative federal contracts to untested reading programs and materials created by former
employees or friend s of the Bush administration,
Reading Firs1 has relied largely on the work of private contractors who chaired the panels that awarded federal grants to
states for vadous literacy programs. But often these contractors, while working for the federal government, also were paid
royalties by the creators of untested reading curriculums and texts that were chosen and recommended to states through the
program.
The inspector general also found that Reading First officials failed to properly screen curriculums for scientific validity or
make certain that granl guidelines were followed.
According to a recent story by’the Washington Post, Education Secrelary Margaret Spellings told a Senate subcommitlee
that she was adopting all of the recommendations made by the deparlment’s inspector general, which included removing
program leaders and hiring additional employees so that fewer outside contractors would be used.
Spellings promised to create an outside advisory council tO oversee the program and promised that the Education
Department’s general counsel would examine lhe records of contractors accused of having conflicts of interest. Those
determined to presen!: actual conflicts would be removed.
We are skeptical that the Education Depadment’s leadership is capable of convening an objective outside advisory council
or has the ability lo recognize what constitutes an actual conflict of interest, seeing as how such conflicts were alJowed to exisl for
more lhan five years.
Schools have already chosen their reading programs, and Spellings’ revisions have come too late to help. Still, Reading
First’s shortcomings and conflicts illustrate some of the reasons Bush’s !to Child Left Behind Acl is a poorly crafted law that
should not be renewed in its currenl form. It is a lravesty that private gain and favoritism were allowed to take precedence over
such an impodant task as teaching poor children to read.
Private - Spellings, ,,,Mar,~l aret
.....
From: McLane, Katherine
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:49 PM
To: Private-Spellings, Margaret; ’scott m. stanzel@who.eop.gov’; Beaton, Meredith; Bdggs,
Kerfi; Colby, Chad; Dunn, David; Evers, Bill; Flowers, Sarah; Halaska, Terrell; Johnson,
Henry; Kuzmich, Holly; !.anders, Angela; Maddox, Lauren; McGrath, John; Mcnitt, Townsend
L.; Mesecar, Doug: Pitts, Elizabeth; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Scheessele, Marc; Simon, Ray;
Tada, Wendy; Talbert, Kent; Toomey, Liam; Tracy Young; Williams, Cynthia; Young, Tracy
Ditto, Trey; Neaie, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Lawmakers Eye Changes to Education Law (AP)
Spellings expressed concern that the program might be in jeopardy, saying, "1 hope we don’t throw the baby out
with the bath water."
Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., and Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who lead the cormnittees in charge of
rewriting the education law, have indicated they support the reading program but intend to make changes to it.
,Private - Spellings, M~_rgaret
From: McLane, Katherine
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:35 AM
To: Private- Spellings, Margaret; Benton, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Colby, Chad; Dunn, David;
Evers, Bill; Flowers, Sarah; Halaska, Terrell; Johnson, Henry; Kuzmich, Holly; Landers,
Angola; Maddox, Lauren; Mcnitt, Townsend L; Mesecar, Dou9; PiEs, Elizabeth; Tucker, Sara
Martinez; Scheessete, Marc; Simon, Ray; Tada, Wendy; Talbert, Kent; Toomey, Liam; Tracy
Young; Williams, Cynthia; Young, Tracy
Quesinberry, Elaine; Farris, Amanda; Conaty, Joseph; ’scott m. stanzel@who.eop.gov’; Ditlo,
Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi.; Ruberg. Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Oversight Is Set For Beleaguered U.S. Reading Program (NY-F)
March 9, 2007
in War Over Teaching Reading, a B.a.-Local e!.ash
"Look at the word," the teacher suggested. Using a method known as whole language, she
prompted him to consider the word’s size- "~s it long enough to be pumpkin?"
Parker looked again. "Pea," he said, correctly.
Call it the $2 miliion reading lesson.
By sticking to its teaching approach, that is the amount Madison passed up under Reading
First, ths Bush administration’s ambitious effort to turn the nation’s poor children into
skilled readers by the third grade.
’~he progr:am, which gives $i bi.llion a year in grants t.c states, was supposed to end the
so-called reading wars -- the battle over the best method of teaching reading -- but has
ip_stead opened a new and bitter front in th~- f~ght.
Accordinj to interviews with school off~.cials and a string of federal audits ~nd e-mail
messages made public in recent months, federal officials and contrac~:ors used the program
tO p~essure schools to adopt approaches that emphasize phonics, focnsing o~ the mechanics
of sounding out syllables, and to discard methods ~rawn from whole language that play down
these mechanics and ~.:se cues like pictures or context to teach,
Federal officials ~ho ran Reading First maintain that only curriculums including regular,
systematic phonics lessons had the backing of "scientifically based reading research"
required by the program.
But in a str~ng of blistering reports, the Ed~/cation Department’s inspect_or gelleral has
found that federal efficla.ls may have violated prohibitions in the law against mandating,
or even en4orsing, specific ,~urriculums. The reports also found that federal officials
overlooked c~nflicts of /.~,reres~ among the contra<:tors that advised states applying for
grants, and that Jn some instances, these contractors wrote reading programs competing for
the money, and stood to oolle~t ~oyaities if their programs were chosen.
?~du.:::ation Secretary Margaret Spellings has said that the problems in Reading First
occurred largely before she took over in 2005~ and that her office has new quidel.~nes for
awardinq gran:_s. She declined a request for an interview.
M.~dison c-fficials say ~hat a year after 91isccp.sin joined Reading First,
cont~acto<s p~essured them to drop their approach, which blends some phonics with ~.~’hole
lanqua~e .:.=-: a ~:rogram ~:~].]ed Balanced L~ter_~cy. Instes.d, they gave up the money -- about
million, according 70 officials here, who say their program raised re~..-.{i[~
in New Yo.rk C.ity, under pressure from federal officials, school authorities in 2094
dropped their citywide balanced literacy approach for a more structu~ed program stronger
in phonics, in 49 low-income schools. At stake was S34 million.
Across the country -- in Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maine and New Jersey -- schools
and districts with programs that did not stress phonics were either rejected for grants or
pressured to change their methods even though some argued, as Madison did, tbat their
programs met the law’s standard.
"We had data demonstrating that our children were learning at the rate that Reading Firs<
was aiming for, and they could not produce a single ounce of data to show the success
rates of the program they were proposing," said Art Rainwater, MadJ.son’s superintendent of
schools.
Both the Nowise and the Senate are laying the groundwork for tough hearings on Reading
First, which is up for renewal this year.
Robert Sweet Jr., a former Congressional aide who wrote much of the Reading First
legislation, said the law aimed at breabing new ground by translating research into lesson
plans. Under the law, the yardstick of a reading program’s scientific ~ali,Jity became a
2000 report by the National Reading Panel.
That panel, created by Congress, with members selected by G. Reid Lyon, a former head of a
branch cf the National Institutes of Healzh, set out he review the research and tel!
Americans what worked. It n.mmed phonics and related skills, vocabulary, fluency and
reading comprehension as the cornerstones of effective reading inskm~ctJon.
Mr. Sweet firmly believes that phonics is the superior method of instruction; he is now
president of hhe National Right ~o Read Foundation, a p~o-phonics group. |’|is e-mail
~ddress begins phonicsman.
With Reading First, he said, "we felt we could put education on a new path."
Or. Lyon, another architect of the legislation, also strongly favors phonics. Teaching
children to read by reason and context, as ~arker did in Madison, rather than by sounding
o~t letters to m~ke word~, is anathema, he sa%d in an interview, ~t~gge~ting that teachers
Of the whole language approach be prosecuted for "educational malpractice.~
Mr. Sweet agreed. "You’ve -got billions usad for the purchase of programs that have no
validity or evidence that they work, and Jn fact they don’t, because you have so really kids
coming out of the schools that can’t read," he said.
But educators in M~dison and elsewhere disagree about the efffectiveness, of phonics, and
say theft results prove their method works.
Under their sy~<tem, the share c.f third graders readin’g at the top two ].evels, proficient
and advanced, had risen to 82 percent by 2~04, from 59 percent six years earlier, e.ven as
~n influx of students in poverty, to
42 percent from 31 percent of Madison’s enrollmen.-_, could have driven down rest scores.
The share of Madison’s black st[~dents reading ar the top l=~vels had doubled to 6,1 percent
in 2C04 from 31 percent six }’ears earlier.
And while 17 percent of African-Americans lacked basic reading skills when M~dison started
.its reading effort in 1998, that number had plunged to 5 percent hy
The exams changed after 2004, making it impossible ~o compare recent results ~ith thos~ of
1998.
Other reading eape=ts, lik~ Richard Allington, past president of the International Reading
Association, also challenge the case for phonics. Dr. Allington and oqhers say the
national. }~anel’s review showcd only mir:cz benefits from phonics through first grade, and
no strong support for one style of ir~.~t--umzion. They also ,--.or~te~hd that children drilled in
phonics end up with poor comprehension skills when they ~ackle more advanced books.
"This revisionist history of what the zes~arch says is ~ildiy popular," Dr. Allingtcn
said. "But i?.’s the main reason why so n~uch of the [ea.:J~n@ comm[~nity has largely rejected
-the National Reading Panel report and this large-scale vision cf what an effective reading
program looks !ike.’~
0nder Reading Firstr many were ShOOt, raged to use a pamphlet, "A Consumer’s Guide to
Evaluating a Core Reading Program Grades K-3," written by two special ed1~cetion
professors, then at the University of Oregon, to gauge wheLher a program was backed by
research.
But the guide also rewards practices, li~e using thin texts of limited vocabulary to
practice syllables, for which there is no backing in research. Dr. A!lington s~id the
central role Washington assigned the guide effectively blocked from approval all but a few
reading programs based on "’made-up criteria."
Deborah C. Simlnons, who helped write zhe guide, said it largely reflected the available
research, but acknowledged that even now, no studies have tested whether children learn to
read faster or better through programs that rated highly in the guide.
Fatally for Madison, the guide does nmt consider consistent gains in zeading achievement
alone sufficient proof of a program’s worth.
in making their case, city officials turned to Kathryn Howc of the Reading First technical
assistance center at the University of Oregon, one of several natiomwide paid by -the
federal Education Department that helped states app].¥- for gr~nts. But early on, they began
to suspect than Br. Howe wanted them to dump their program.
At a workshop, she showed them how the guide valued ezposin~ all children to identical
instruction in phonics. Madison’s program is based on ~ai!oril]~ strategies individually,
with i~ss emphasis on drilling.
Dr. Howe used the Houghton Mifflin program as a model; officials here believed that
approval would b~ certain if only they switched to that program, they said.
In interviews, Dr. Howe said she had not meant to endorse the I]o~ghton Mifflin program and
used it only for illustration° and had no ties te the company. She added that she might
have been misunderstood.
"I certainly didn’t say, \You should buy Houghton Miff!i.n,’ " she said. "I do rome.niger
saying: ’You can do this without buying a purchased progFam, it’s easier .if you have a
purchased program, so you might think about that.’ "
Dr. Howe said Madison’s program might have suited mosz studenzs, but not those Jn the five
schools applying for grants. "Maybe those students needed a different approach," she said.
Mary Watson Paterson, Madison’s reading chief, said the city did use intensive phonics
instruction, bur only far struggling children.
After providing Dr. Howe extensive documentation, Madison offi.cials received a !etzer from
her and the centez"s director, saying that because t}~ ui%y’s program lacked uniformity
and relied too much on teacher judgment, they couid not vouch to Washington that its
approabh was grcunded ~n research.
Ultimsteiy Madison withdrew from Reading First, said Mr. Rainwater, the superintende~t,
because educators here Grew c6nvinced the: approval would never come.
"It really hc[led down to, we weze going to have to abandon our reading program," the
sunerintendent said.
A subsequent le:ter from Dr. Ho~,’e seemed ts confirm his vi.~w. "’Madisc.n made a good
decision" in wi~_hdrawing, she ’,.;rote, "since Reading First is a very prescriptive program
that does not match your dis.trict’s readi:,g program as it stands
=The superintendent said thal we will only apply for this grant if pad: of our time is spent on dissemination of the Reading First
model to the other schools in the district," Grog Lewis, the districl’s Reading First director, recalled recently. °I’ve been involved in
a lot of reforms, but they never made any difference in the classroom. But now instruction has changed, and, not surprisingly,
performance has changed.’F
Reading Rituals (EDWEEK)
By Kathleen Kennedy Manzo
Education Week, February 28, 2007
The Ogden, Utah, schools have used the mandates of the federal Reading First. grant program to i~ne-tune instruction
districtwide, and students’ scores are way up.
In 2002, big dreams were infectious in this small manufacturing city where the Wasatch Mountain Range provided the
backdrop of some of the ski events of the Olympic Games.
]hat year, educators in Ogden’s schools set their sights high as well, when they turned to a federal grant program to
transform reading instruction and student achievement in low-performing schools.
But ofli~ials envisioned a broader goal for the 12,300-~tudent district, with its growing Hispanic population and widespread
poverty. If they were going to make a commitment to improve reading, they would have to spread the Reading First model-
including intensive professional development, research-based instruclJon, and monitoring of student progress-beyond the four
schools participating in the initiative to all K-5 classrooms.
Over Ihe past several years, schools in this manufacturing and tourism hub have dramatically changed how they teach
reading, and built a more knowledgeable teaching corps in the process. Steady improvements in student test scores-and a
dramatic leap at two schools-have followed.
"The superinlendent said 1hat we will only apply for this grant if part of our time Is spent on dissemination of the Reading
First model to the other schools in the dislrict," Greg Lewis, the district’s Reading First director, recalled recently. "I’ve been
Involved in a lot of reforms, but they never made any difference in the classroom, But now instruclion has changed, and, not
surprisingly, performance has changed."
Reading First was approved by Congress in 2001 under the 11o Child Left Behind Act ~o bdng scientifically based reading
methods and materials to struggling schools. The $1 billion-a-year initiative has been plagued by controversy over how it was
implemented by federal officials and consultants, including charges of interference in state and local decisionmaking and of
favoritism toward certain reading programs. ("E-Mails Reveal Federal Reach Over Reading," Feb. 21, 2007.)
The program has found favor, though, in many of its 5,70.0 grantee schools. While the grants go Io districls only for
specified schools, the federal initiative allows states and districts to use part of the funding to provide Iraining in the Reading Firsl
model to teachers in all schools.
A federally commissioned report and a 2006 survey by lhe Washington-based Center on Education Policy found that
Reading First schools are devoting more time to reading instruction, conducl more substantive professional developmenl in the
subject for teachers, and are more likely than nonparticipating schools to use assessment resulls to inform instruction.
Those changes are evident in Jenny DeCorso’s 2nd grade classroom at. Gramercy Elementary School, where rows of
desks have been replaced with Iables for small-group instruction, shelves are stocked with books sorted by genre and reading
level, and centers allow studenls to tackle a variety of lileracy activities designed to build their fluency and comprehension.
Lessons are punctualed with explicit and carefully sequenced skill-building drills, and opportunities to practice what
sludents have learned. Vocabulary words such as "strategy~ and "unexpected" are posted on the window next to a cover
illustration from the latest book selection, Annie and the Wild Animals. Punctuation rules and other writing conventions adorn the
walls.
Ms. DeCorso, an 11-year veteran of leaching, remembers when she and her colleagues each foilowed their own daily
plans for teaching reading, and struggle~] in solitude to figure out how to reach students who weren’t learning from them. "We
closed our doors and did our own thing," she said,
"It used to be more commonplace to have kids who could read nothing when they came to 2nd grade," she added. "Now,
there are only a few who can’t read at this point,"
Of the 435 students at the school, more than half are Hispanic, and 87 percent are poor.
After completing a number of graduate courses in reading-a requirement for teachers in Reading First schools here-Ms.
DeCorso says she is now more knowledgeable about how to teach the skill, and belier equipped to carry out the structured
curriculum and to provide supplemental lessons where needed.
She and the other 2nd grade teachers meet regularly to refine lessons, share insights and strategies for helping struggling
readers, and analyze data from regular student assessments. On a recent Tuesday morning, a reading expert from Utah State
University observed lhe teachers at work, as he does at schools here each week, and gave detailed feedback on how welt their
lessons and classroom structure reflected research on effective practices. The critique, while harsh at times, prompted Ihe
teachers to justify their approaches, or hash out. how to improve them.
In the 2rid grade classroom next door, Shannon Cook follows a similar structure as other teachers here for the three-hour
reading and language arts block each morning. In one corner, Ms. Cook sits with just a handful of her 25 pupils, helping them
pronounce in rapid succession words wilh the "long e" sound, a lesson out of Harcoud Trophies, lhe text used in Reading First
schools here. She holds up a slick card with an illustrated eagle and turns it over to reveal the spelling as the children say the
word in unison. Next is a leaf, then a bead.
It’s evident that all five pupils can decode the words, and have grasped the sound. They move on to a poem and highlight
words with the "long e" sound in a clever verse, They complete several other related activities before Ms. Cook, who is in her
third year of teaching, calls together another group to work on a more challenging set of drills.
In the far qomer of the room, several pupils are getting a quick course of phonics drills from a teacher’s aide,
The rest of the children are working diligently at the literacy centers set up around the room. Lissete Landaverde is sorting
cards with words that include the "long e." Mortice Sanguino is finishing a popular chapter book before she answers questions
about the author she has been studying, and Alexia Lopez is thinking of descriptive words to include in her stop/about her
favorite summertime memory. Other students are sitting on the floor wilh headphones for a listening exercise.
"1 rea[t really well,° said Ibrahirn Njie, who looked up from the story he was wdting to boast about his improving fluency. ’Tin
reading faster than ever ... 95 words a minute the last time I wen1 to computer lab."
Teachers in Ogden have that kind of information, and other data, at their fingertips and receive continuing advice on how to
use it to target their lessons to students’ individual needs.
During planning time at Dee Elementary School, for example, the 2nd grade team held its weekly meeting with reading
coach Margaret Young to analyze test scores and figure out which specific skills students were having ~ouble mastering.
Those sessions have helped teachers pinpoint pupils’ weak spots and find better instructional slralegies for strengthening
their skills. Teachers at this school, which until recently was rated as the most challenged in the slate, never had Olympic-size
dreams before. Their goals for raising reading proficiency, however, are no longer considered unattainable.
"During my first year here at a parent-teacher conference, I had no clue what to tell the parents, ! had no data about how
they were doing," said Stephanie McGaughey, who has taught at the school for eight years. "Now, I can show them where their
child is compared to the ciass average and benchmarks, and explain why we are concerned about their progress."
Before she attended the reading classes and workshops through Reading First, "I just taught the children the same way,"
Ms. McGaughey added. "If they got it, they got it; if they didn’t, I still moved on." Now, she said, she has an arsenal of slrategies
for helping each student master all the essential skills, and support from a coach to help her use them.
Throughout the district, teachers are drawing on the lessons learned al the Reading First schools to improve instruction
more broadly, A state-sponsored iniliative, Performance Plus, allows the district to offer some of the same professional
development and support services to the schools that aren’t part of the federal grant, albeit with a fraction of the funding.
Convincing administrators and teachers of the benefits of the voluntary program has been a hard sell at some schools,
according Io Reed Spencer, the district’s executive director of curr}culum and assessment. Some 80 percent of the 125 leachers
in lhe district’s non-Reading First schools have signed on to the program, which requires that they a~tend workshops and classes
after school hours and on weekends.
But now, all teachers are bound by contract to adhere to the principles of effective instruction outlined in the Reading First
plan, whether they’ve participated in the additional training or not. That means they are expected to teach, explicitly and
systematically, the five components required of grantees’ programs under the federal law: phonemic awareness, phonics,
fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. In addffion, 1he state directs them to develop students’ oral-language and writing skills,
as well as several other areas that influence reading comprehension.
"We reserve lhe dght to speak to any teacher at any moment about the explicitness of their instruclion. Thal’s a direct
outgrowlh of Reading First," said Mr. Spencer. "And principals understand that they can’t supervise things that they don’t know
about."
Principals and reading coaches throughout the distdct get the grounding they need in monthly meetings and pedodic
workshops that focus on effeclive instruction, assessment, and classroom observation. Administrabrs from Reading First schools
meet as a group each week lo update one another on how the program is working.
The intense focus on reading instruction is paying off in ir~proved results on tests, Mr. Lewis said. And last school year, all
of the Reading First schools met goals under lhe No Child Left Behind law for adequate yearly progress in reading for the first
time.
Teachers here are celebrating those gains. But the proof of the program’s impact, they say, is in the day4:o-day changes
they’ve seen in their own practice and in children’s achievements in the classroom.
"t never thought a kindergartner could go beyond letter recognitbn, but now we’re seeing them tea&" said Melissa Brock, a
veteran kiadergarl:en teacher at Bonneville Elementary School, where nearly half l:he 45t) students are Hispanic, and 80 percent
qualify for free or reduced-price lunches. Full-day kindergarten has given Ms. Brock and her colleagues more time to build a
foundation for reading. Reading First, she said, has introduced a sounder instructional approach.
°Bef~e, ] was kind of flying by the seat of my pants," she said. "Now, 1 actually feel more competent and capable as a
teacher."
Coverage of distdct-level improvement efforts is underwritten in pad by grants from the Carnegie Corporation of New York
and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundatior~.
Vo]. 26, Issue 25, Pages 27-29
Private - Spellings, Margaret
From; McLane, Katherine
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:49 AM
To: Private - Spellings, Margaret; Conaty, Joseph; Farris, Amanda; Beaton, Meredith; Briggs,
Kerri; Dunn, David; Eve~s, Bill; Flowers, Sarah; Halaska, Terrell; Johnson, Henry; Kuzmich,
Holly; I.anders, Angola; Maddox, Lauren; Mcnitt, Townsend L; Mesecar, Doug; PiEs,
Elizabeth; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Scheessele, Marc; Simon. Ray; Tada, Wendy; Talbert,
Kent; Tourney, Liarn; Tracy Young; Williams, Cynthia; Young, Tracy
Colby, Chad; Ditto, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudol:,
Samara
Subject: IG again slaps ED for wrongdoing in Reading First program (Education Daily)
In a letter of response, Deputy Secretary Ray Simon said ED agrees thai, "at the RLAs, Depadment officials could have
and should have done more to clarify that the Department was not promoting or endorsing specific reading programs, materials,
assessment instruments or models of instruction." But Simon added 1hat the departmenl doesn’t agree fully with lG’s findings
because it neglected to consider the conferences’ positive impact on the program,
IG again slaps EB for wrongdoing in Reading First program (Education Daily)
By Kris Kitto
Education Daily, February 26, 2007
.The Education Department unlawfully promoted specific reading curricula and a reading assessment test when laying the
groundwork for the $1 billion-a-year Reading First Program, according b an Office of Inspector General audit released late last
week.
Auditors combed through comments from Reading First conference participants and e-mails from ED personnel to
determine [hat the department showed favoritism toward certain reading programs, such as Direct Instruclion and Open Coud,
from the time the national program launched in 2002,
The audit focuses on the department’s Reading Leadership Academies, three conferences held shortly after the program
was authorized through the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act. The academies were intended to help state administrators
implement programs founded on scientifically based reading research, but several portions of the conferences seemed like
targeted promotions to many attendees.
°I felt like it was simply a push for a national curriculum,° reads one attendee comment cited by the audit. "1 think t’11 go buy
shares in Open Court!" The audit is the fifth in a six-part IG sedes thal has embroiled a program otherwise heralded as a
substantial effort to make strides in Iiteracy among at-risk children.
I[ also found thal ED seemed to encourage use of lhe Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Assessment Test in
conference materials.
Bob Slavin, chairman of the reading-based school reform model Success For All and one of the original complainants to IG,
said the audit confirmed what many people in the industry already knew.
Any vindication Slavin may feel, though, [s outweighed by the time lag that now prevents fhe possibility of a just solution,
he said,
"What’s discouraging about this.., is that at the time when these issues were first brought up, it was possible to have done
something," Slavin said, explaining he had repealed meetings with ED officials to express his concerns. Those meetings fell on
deaf ears, he said, forcing him to take his complaint to 1G in June 2005.
The program’s money has now been allocated, he said, making it difficult lo correct ED’s influence on Reading First
curricula.
In a letter of response, Deputy Secretary Ray Simon said ED agrees that, =at the RLAs, Department officials could have
and should have done more to clarify thai the Depadment was not promoting or endorsing specific reading programs, materials,
assessment instruments or models of instruction."
But Simon added that the department doesn’t agree fully with IG’s findings because it neglected to consider the
conferences’ positive impact on the program.
The audit also examined the Reading First Web site and an April 2002 guidance book, finding that both were in compliance
with the law.
Private - Spellings, ~argaret
From: McLane, Katherine
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:46 AM
To." Private - Spellings, Margaret; Beaten, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Dunn, David; Evers, Bill;
Flowers, Sarah; Halaska, Terrell; Johnson, Henry; Kuzmich, Ho!ly; Lenders, Angola; Maddox,
Lauren; Mcni[l:, Townsend L; Mesecar, Doug; Pitts, Elizabeth; Tucker, Sara Martinez;
Scheessele, Marc; Simon, Ray; Tada, Wendy; Talbert, Kent; Toomey, Liam; Tracy Young;
Williams, Cynthia; Young, Tracy
Co: Colby, Chad; Ditto, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof,
Samara
Subject: Study: Bias By The Billions In Flawed Ed Program (ABC)
In a written response to the report, Deputy Education Secretary Ray Simon said the depadrnent agreed that "there were
areas for improvement," but was concerned that the report ’did not recognize the positive aspects" of the educational panels and
materials reviewed.
Despite stumbles, Reading First imbues science into instruction (Education Daily)
By Jeanne Sweeney and Stephen Sawchuk
Education Daily, February 23, 2007
Reading First, the No Child Left Behind Act’s K-3 reading initiative, has, for all its troubles, managed to quietly shepherd an
evolution in reading instruction that has most researchers, educators, and policymakers agreeing on at least one thing: science
can tell us much about the way children become readers.
The scandal over whelher the Education Department favored some commercial programs has a[tracted media attention to
the program, but for local ofi;cials, that has overshadowed the program’s real success - a sea change in how teachers approach
reading instructior~.
Motivated by NCLB’s demand that all children read at grade levet by 2014, districts are increasingly adopting research-
based practices to teach a set of specific skills defined by the National Reading Panel as essenliaf for every proficient reader.
That change has fostered collaboration among teachers and consistency behind classroom doors.
’Teachers are all speaking the same language, they have a cerumen vocabulary," said Sandra Koczwara, who wrote
Putnam County {Tenn.) Schools’ Reading First grant.
As districts focus on instruclion, however, the program is engendering new debates over whelher classroom instruction is
too rigid and scripted, whether the focus on the five reading skills is toe narrow, or whether it is appropriale to prescribe one
method of teaching when children’s reading skills vary widely in the early grades.
Also up in the air is the program’s ~uture. Education stakeholders generally believe the program will be part of the No Child
Left Behind Act reauthorization, but questions remain about what tweaks Congress might make to Reading First in light of the
scandal - and whether those tweaks could impact the program’s instructional components.
"People want to get their pound of flesh politically," said Andrew Rotherham, co-direclor of the Education Seclor.
Five componenls Enacted at a critical time in the decades-long "reading wars" between proponents of old-style phonics
instruction and advocates of whole language, observers declared Reading First a win for the traditionalists. The tegislai~ion
speci[ically adopted the NRP’s recommendalion that al! children be instructed in five skills: phonemic awareness, phonics,
vocabulary, fluency and comprehension.
ED officials implemented this requirement to the point of misconduct, according to a sedes of internal reviews (see box),
turning down states’ grant applications until they promised to adhere to EB’s narrow specifications.
But as money started flowing, acceptance of the NRP’s recommendations grew.
"We’re not here to experiment with our children," said James Herman, director of Reading Firsl in Tennessee. "We have to
know wh at works."
And as one former federal Reading First official says, whichever program dislricts ultimately selected, its impact lay in how
well leachers used it to instruct to the five cornponenls.
"Most programs will say they have lhose five components," said Sand! Jacobs, former Reading First program officer. "[But]
if you’re not talking about explicit and systematic instruction, then you’re not necessarily talking about scientifically based reading
instruction."
Teacher prep While controversy at the national level has centered on Iextbooks and favored publishers, school officials say
the most fundamental element of’ their Reading First programs has been staff development, That’s because most practicing
teachers were not educated in the five components of reading, and are not equipped to apply research-based strategies in the
classroom.
"We had to reeducate our teachers in the five components," Koczwara said.
"It’s really three pieces," Jacobs said, noting 1hat professional development and instruclior~al strategies are ultimately
grounded in ongoing progress monitoring of students’ growth and areas of weakness. ’Anylhing that says this is all about a
textbook is just totally wrong."
Louisa Moats, a reading consultant and researcher with Sopris West, said the combination has especially impacted high-
needs schools.
"What Reading First has been able to engender through professional developmenl, coaching, accountability, leadership
training and an understanding of the practices that work be~ter than others, is a complete change in the functioning of a school
culture," Moa~s said.
Too scripted?
A teslament to thal change is districts are now debating the hows rather than the whys of scientifically based reading
instruction.
For example, several popular curricula, such as the widely used Open Court, have instructional routines on each oflhe five
components that dictate what the teacher is to do and say when introducing l:he reading lechnique.
Some leaders have praised that approach l~or facilitating program fidelity.
"We’ve stayed pure to the curriculum, leaching the standards," said Nancy Lucia, associate superintendent in Elk Grove
(Calif.) Unified School District, which uses Open Courl.
Others, lhough, characterize the approach as overly "scripted.°
"[Many districts] use the series like a cut and dry recipe and it doesn’t always work well,~ said Cathy Roller, director of
research and policy for the International Reading Association.
Moals said such curricula are highly structured and help teachers internalize a routine.
And administrators agree their teachers do more than adhere to a script. In Elk Grove, academic support teams set annual
targets for each student, monitor progress regularly and adjust instruction as necessary, Lucia said.
Still, reading is much more complex than five components, Roller argues. °Motivation is crucial," she said. "It doesn’t do any
good to cover the five components if you’ve got kids who don’t want to do it?
Tweaking the model One of the concerns for some researchers is whether it is appropriate to assume all children - even all
at-risk children- need idenlical instruction in the primary grades.
In a typical Reading Fiml: model, all children receive gO to 120 minutes of daily core instruction in a whole-group setting,
often called Tier I, with supplemental instruction and intewenlions in successive tiers for strugglers.
But even within Tier I teachers should tailor activities to the skill level ofindiviclual children, says Carol Oonnor, a
researcher at Florida State University and lha Florida Oenter for Reading Research, one of the ED4undecl Reading First
technical assistance centers "There is a lendency to rely too much on the core curriculum," she said. °We don’t want everyone to
be on the same page al the same time.’
Administrators share her concern.
"Our upper quintile students are nut making as much progress,~ Koczwara said. ~That is one of the areas we need to look
Moats said ideally, teachers differentiate instruction from the beginning and use the ongoing progress monitoring to adjust
instruction. Such a practice models the li’aditional tiered "reading groups~ used in American elemenlary schools. The difference,
Moals noted, is the focus on getting students with the weakest skills caught up.
Jacobs said the bes! approach is probably a mix. "The key is ensurinfl that time is well and appropriately spent.’~
Private_- S pe,,!lin~lsLMa rgaret ...........................
From: McLane, Katherine
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 8:23 AM
To: Private - Spellings, Margaret; Beaten, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Dunn, David; Evers, Bill;
Flowers, Sarah; Halaska, Terrell; Johnson, Henry; Kuzmich, Holly; Landers, Angela: Maddox,
Lauren; Mcnitt, Townsend L; Mesecar, Doug; Pills, Elizabeth; Tucker, Sara Martinez-
Scheessele, Marc; Simon, Ray; Tada, Wendy: Talbert, Kent; Toomey, Liarn; Tracy Y~ung;
Williams, Cynthia; Young, Tracy
Colby, Chad; Ditto, Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terrell, Julie; Yudof,
Samara
Subject: House Members Seek Ways To Target Education Funds (Ed Daily)
Remember Phonics Vs. Whole Language? The War Is Back On. (CGaz WV)
By Chester E. Finn Jr, And Martin A. Davis Jr.
Charle.ston (V~/) Gazette, February 11, 2007
For more than three decades, advocates of °whole-language" reading inslruction have argued - to the delight of many
teachers and public school administrators - that learning to read is a "natural" process for children. Create reading centers in
classrooms; put good, fun books in children’s hands and allow 1hem to explore; then encourage them to "read," even if they cant
actually make out many of the words on the page. After all, they can use conte;d clues and such. Eventually, they’ll get it. So say
fhe believers.
Seven years ago, the National Reading Panel issued a report that was - well, that should have been - devastating to whole-
language proponents. It identified five essential elements that every child must master to be a good reader: phonemic
awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension. Early-reading programs that fully incorporate these t]ve elements
into their materials and methods are propedy termed "scientifically-based reading research" programs.
But what should have been the death knell of whole language programs has instead become a new ticket to prosperity. For
instead of accepting the panel’s conclusbns and truly reworking - or ending - their products, they’ve relabeled themselves,
reworked their marketing materials, added happy talk about ~e five elements and now claim to be scientificaliy based programs.
Only they’re not.
More than a few people have been fooled, including the leaders of such large districts as Denver, Salt Lake City and New
York City. How could so many professionals be misled? Some, no doubt, craved the illusion, because their own habits, their own
training or their ideology predisposes them to favor whole-language instruction. (How romantic to rail against "scripted," "soulless"
research-based interventions]) The faux-scientif]c based programs provide a screen behind which they can continue doing what
they want.
In part, though, the problem adses from the ~ve elements themselves.
As set forth by the National Reading Panel, these oversimplify the complex scientific findings on how children learn to read.
Reality is more complicated. The most effective scientific-based programs weave the key elements together, instead of teaching
each in isolation, so that students learn phonics and explicit speech sounds, for example, as they’re mastering word meaning
and grammar.
if the buyer isn’l atluned to these complexities and views lhe panel’s elements more like a checklist of elements that a
reading program must assure him that it includes, it’s not hard b slip a faux science-based program by him. Yet the results of
selecting the wrong program are profound. Most children identified before second grade as having trouble learnir~g to read can
learn to real well with a bona fide science-based program. But if children fall through the cracks in these early years, the odds of
ever bringing them to proficiency fall sharply. Which helps to explain the nation’s depressing reading achievement results -
particularly in the middle- and high-schooJ years - over the past decade and a half.
That whole language has nine lives is no surprise to Louisa Moats, who seven years ago warned the country in an earlier
Fordham report. °Whole Language Lives On: The Illusion of ’Balanced’ Reading’," about the lengths whole-language advocates
would go to keep their flawed programs alive and on the market. That appraisal remains one of our most-sought works.
Whole language may be back, butso is Louisa, this time with a flew report: ’Whole-Language High Jinks,° which explains
how prospective buyers can tell when a leading program’s claims are written to dupe lhem.
But her report is more than a "how-to" guide, tt also provides impodanl context to the battles still raging in Washington and
several state capitals over the federal Reading First program, which offers $1 billion per year to the nation’s neediest elementary
schools to implement science based programs.
To its credit, the U.S. Department of Education hasn’t been halve about the "whole language wolves in scientific sheep’s
clothing" problem. Exactly because it knew that non-science-based programs would pretend to be something that they weren’t
(after all, much money was at stake), it pushed states and districts hard to purchase only the real deal. And for this, members of
Congress, the Department’s Inspector General, sundry editorial writers and, especially, the vendors of whole language programs
have all cded foul.
But as Sol Stem explains in an excellenl n~w City Journal article, "If [Reading First Director Chris] Doherty’s sin was to lean
on a state education agency or two to promote a reading program backed by science over one that wasn’t, well, that’s just what
the Reading First legislation intended."
And guess what? True science-based programs yield strong results. Birmingham, Ala., for example, has adopted such a
program, has trained its teachers thoroughly in how to best instruct students and has seen significant improvement not only in
reading but also in reading-dependent subjects such as history. Other districts are beginning to take notice.
Yes, there’s a scandal to be reported about reading. But it’s not about overzealous federal olficials pushing states and
districts to purchase p~e-determined programs. It’s about the purveyors of discredited reading programs cynically re-labeling their
products as something that they are not, all in the cause of reaping a cash windfall. All while children’s futures are at slake.
Where’s the outrage about that?
Chester E. Finn Jr. is president and Marlin A. Davis Jr. is senior writer and editor at the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
This commentary originally appeared in "Education Gadfly," the foundation’s weekly electronic newsletter.
Private - Spellin s, Margaret
From: katherine mclane
Sent: Monday, January
To; Neale, Rebecca; Terrell, Julie; Beaton, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Ruberg, Casey; Colby, Chad;
Williams, Cynthia; Dunn, David; Kuzmich, Holly; La Force, Hudson; Landers, Angela; Maddox,
Lauren; Private - Spellings, Margaret; Simon, Ray; Reich, Heidi; rob Saliterman; Yudof,
Samara; Halaska, Terrell; Toner, Jana; Mcnitt, Townsend L; Young, Tracy; Ditto, Trey;
Tucker, Sara Martinez
Subject: Education OfficiaJs Faulted (NYT)
By William McQuiilen
Feb. 4 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush proposed today a $59.2 billion budget for the U.S.
Education Department, a 3.5 percent increase.
Bush is seeking a 2.9 pcrcent increase tbr fiscal year 2009 in the progrmn that provides most federal
funding for "’No Child Lefi Behind," which requires annual reading and math tests for almost 50 million
children in public schools.
No Child Lefl Behind has been Bush’s signature domestic achievement. The president has resisted calls
for changes from teachers’ unions and some Democrats, who say- it places too much emphasis on
standardized tests and penalizes schools with hard- to-teach students. While the law was passed Mth
biparlisan support, Democrats say the administration hasn’t provided the money it promised for the
program.
"’This budget pro~’ides the necessar?" resources for critical programs that equip Anaerican students with
the skills they need to compete and succeed in the knowledge-based economy," Secretar3, of Education
Margaret Spellings said in a statement.
Democrats, who contend the No Child law has been shorted by $55 billion over the past five years, said
the added spending is insufficient.
"The president’s proposed increase t\~r funding for public schools through the No Child Left Behind law
is not enough even to keep pace with inflation," said George Millcr, the chairman of the l Iouse’s
educalio~l committee, in a sU~tement. "’The president has made it clear that he intends to end his
administration the same way he started it -- by breaking his promises to public schools and
schoolchildren."
The budgel plan boosts discretionary funding for Poll grants, a form of aid to college undergraduates, by
4/22/2008
Page 2 of 2
19 percent. Bush signed legislation in September increasing the maximum value of the assistance to
$5,400 a year for each student by 2012, from $4,050 in 2006. The increase will be funded tt-n’ough cuts
to subsidies for student-loan pro’,’iders, such as SLM Corp. in Reston, Virginia.
Bush is proposing a total federal budget of $3.11 lrillion for fiscal 2009, up 6 percent from the $2.93
trillion for the current year. The plan projects that continued economic growth and spending cuts will
produce a $48 billion surplus Ivy 2012.
Bush’s proposed budget of $14,3 billion for Title I programs to help schools se~’ing low-income
residents is a 2.9 percent increase. Schools stand to lose Title 1 aid if they don’t meet requirements of the
No Child Left Behind law.
The law was enacted in 2002 and was up for renewal last year. Even without congressional
reauthorization, No ChiId Left Behind wilI remai~a on llae books in its current form.
Bush’s budget calls for $1 billion, up from $393 million this year, Ibr Reading First, a program that
resulted in congressional mid Justice Department investigations into potential conflicts of interest.
Reading First was criticized by congressional Democrats la~ year al-ler reports alleged mismanagement,
including allegations that some people who chose course material had connections to the companies that
produced the material.
Spellh~gs said lhe program has since complied with suggestion made by the inspector general. The
program, which was cut 62 percent by Congress for the current year’s budget, had been making progrees,
she said.
"" It’s regrettable to take a cut of that magnitude overnight," Spellings lold reporters on a conl)rence call.
"’I hope Congless will have some sense about it."
Improving U.S. education is critical to ensuring that poor children have an oppommi~" to succeed, Bush
said his State of the Union address on Jan. 28. He suggested a $300 million voucher program for low-
income students. Spellings said the program would ’target students in"chmnically low performing
schools."
"’We must trust stude~Rs to learn if given the chance, and empower parents to demand results from our
schools," Bush said.
]he voucher plan, dubbed "Pell Grants for Kids" by Bush, will face congressional opposition. Miller, of
California, called it a "bad idea" and said Congress would re.iect it.
4122/20{)8
Page l of 2
News Blog
Iligher-edueation new~ from around Web
February 3, 2008
Reading First, a federal program that provides grants to improve reading instruction at low-
income elementary schools, would see its full $1-billion budget resto[ed in the 2009 fiscal
year under the spending blueprint President Bush will present tomorrow, according to The
Washington Post.
Democrats in Congress had slashed the program’s funds for this year to about $393-mitlion
after it came under sharp criticism. Several university-based consultants who advised states
on how to spend their Reading First grants have been .a__c..c__u_s_e.d_._o_f~_0._an_c_j.al confl.i..cts 9f
interest. The consultants have strenuously denied any wrongdoing.
The U.S. secretary of education, Margaret Spellings, told reporters on Friday that Mr. Bush
was "going to work hard to get that funding restored, to ask for the billion dollars and help
Congress see the error of their ways," according to the PosL
In another provision reflecting a disagreement with Congress, Mr. Bush again will propose
eliminating funds for the Robert C. Byrd Honors Scholarship Program, the newspaper
reported. Mr. Bush has made similar proposals in his last three budgets, but Congress has
continued to support the program, which received about $40-million this year. The program is
named for one of the president’s harshest critics in Congress, Sen. Robert C. Byrd, a West
Virginia Democrat.
Information about the president’s budget began leaking oul on Friday, when the Associated
Press reported that Mr. Bush would seek a $2._§_-biili.op increase for the Pell Grant pr0_gLa_m.
--Charles Huckabee
Comments
412212008
P~. 2 of 2
I want to express my heartfelt thanks, that here, in the years just before my death, I
managed to squeeze into my short lifespan deep personal experience of the worst
President our nation has ever had. No more effective way to undermine "conservatism"
and "republican party° stuff has ever been devised. Nothing beats personal experience
of evil combined with deep incompetence. The nice thing about evil is it is petty,
providing endless entertainments like the above issues. It is not that Satan is powerful
and hurts all, it is like the movie Satan some decades ago, sitting in some Dallas or
Kennebunkport basement stripping random pages out of books hung on clotheslines,
as his daily bread. I thought that that movie Satan was fiction till this boob, front man to
Cheney, was "elected°. Americans deserve richly every single bad thing that happens to
them. They twice chose evil incompetence over incompetent goodheartedness.
Note from Bill Evers: I circulate articles within ED that are pertinent to educational
policymaking. Articles are circulated because they are of interest, not because ! or
OPEPD or anyone else in ED agrees with them.
4/22/2008
Page 1 o£22
1) ABC News: Bill Clinton Blames Kennedy for No Child Left t~ehind Flaws
2) Yahoo! News: Bill Clinton Campaigns... Agaiust Ted Kennedy (John Nichols)
3) Washington Post (Editorial): A Boost for D.C. Schools; President Bush’s,new budget would
fund badly needed reforms
4) Washington Post: President’s Spending Plan Would Riva| 2004 Deficit (Michael Abramowitz
and Jonathan Weisman)
5) Washington Posl: Area Schools Set To Lose Millions Under Medicaid Policy Changes (Maria
Glod)
6) Washington Post: An All-Too-Quiet Reaction Over D.C. Schools’ Future (Mare Fisher)
7) Associated Press: Focus on reading produces a Philadelphia school that really worlLs (Susan
Snyder)
8) New York Daily News: Lef~ in dark over No Child Left Behind (Carrie Melago)
9) Associated Press: Popular programs face budget squeeze (Andrew Taylor)
10) Houston Chronicle: Some schools saying no to federal dollars; Forgoing funds provides
greater range in teaching (Susie Pakoua Vang)
4/22i200~
Page 2 of 22
ABC Ne~vs
Bill Clinton Blames Kennedy for No Child Left Behind Flaws
Yahoo[ News
Bill Clinton Campaigns... Against Ted Kennedy
John Nichols
February 3, 2008 10:20 a.m. EST
The Nation -- Do we think a certain former president might still be smarting over Ted Kennedy’s
decision to endorse Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton?
Bill Clinton tried hard to land the endorsement of the senator from Massachusetts for his wife. Plenty of
cajoling and calling was expended in the effort during the hectic month of January. But K.emledy,
offended by Bill Clinton’s racially-tinged campaigning in South Carolina, finally went for his yotmger
colleague ti’om Illinois.
With the senator’s move came much of the Kennedy clan -- including, most recently, Ethel Kennedy, the
widow of the first family of liberalism’s most iconic campaigner, Bobby Kennedy -- and a critical boost
for Obarna going into the Super Tuesday primaries.
Instead, he’s now slipping digs at the senior Kennedy into his remarks while campaigning before
Democratic audiences in key states.
On Thursday’ in Arizona, the former president said, "I want you to think about this, and I have to say,
this was a train wreck that was not intended. No Child Left Behind was supported by George Bush and
Sen. "red Kemaedy and everybody in between. Why? Because they didn’t talk to enough teachers before
they did that."
No Child Left Behind -- the Bush administration’s federal education initiative that mandated much new
testing but offered scant new funding - is exceptionally unpopular with teachers and other prime
Democratic voting blocs.
In case anyone thought that the complaint aboul Kennedy was an off-hand reference, Bill Clinton voiced
a similar dig on the Massachusetts senator Friday at a campaign stop in Arkansas, which will hold its
primary on Tuesday. Speaking to 400 educators and students in Texarkana, the former president said No
Child Left Behind exists in its current fi)rm because "the Presidenl made a deal with Senator Kennedy..."
Kennedy, long a key player on education issues in the Congress, did indeed play a role in shaping and
passing No Child Left Behind.
But in a campaign season that has not been without its cynical statements, these comments by the former
president stud out.
ll’s ~ot just that, after t,ying so hard to secure Kennedy’s endorsement for his wife, Clinton is now
linking the senator with Bush in front of Dcmocralic audiences.
4/22/2008
Page 4 of 22
~,Vhat Bill Clinton fails to spell out on the campaign trail is that I-Iillary C]inton was an ally of Ted
Kennedy in promoling No Child Left Behind. She voted for the No Child Left Behind Act when it
passed the Senate in 2001, and has declared that, "I believe that eve~ child should be taught by a
qualified teacher and that schools should be accountable to the parents of the children they serve. That is
why I supported the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001 ,and continue to believe in file principles beNnd
the landmark law."
Both Kennedy and Hillary Clinton are now complain about the Bush administration’s t~ailed
implementation of the education reforms.
\~]~en he campaigned for the Senate in 2003 mad 2004, 0bmna did so as a critic of No Child Left
Behind, telling Illinois voters that the law "imposes new requirements on our public schools while
failing to provide tl~e resources so that schools can meet the new requirements."
4122/2008
Page 5 of 22
Washington Post
Editorial
4t22/2008
Page 6 of 22
Washington Post
President’s Spending Plan Would Rival 2004 Deficit
By Michael Abramowitz and Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post
President Bush will present a budget tomorrow that would slow the grov~qh of Medicare and cut or
eliminate an array of domestic programs but still anticipates a flood of new- red ink that will rival the
record deficits of his first terni, administration officials said.
Bush’s fiscal 2009 budget would increase defense spending by 5 percent and put a modest amount of
new money into favored initiatives such as veterm~s affairs, education and homeland securit)T.
But the president wants to dramatically slow the growth of big federal health programs, reduce anti-
ter~’orism grants for states and cities, and cut spending on anti-poverty, housing and social service
programs, according to budget documents and ix~terviews with officials throughout 1he federal
government.
Even as he proposes restoring trading for the controversial Reading First program, Bush will take aim at
a number of education initiatives, officials said. The early literacy progrmn Even Start would be
eliminated, as would grants to states for education technology, technology careers and incarcerated
youth. Funding for a college scholarship program named after Senate Appropriations Comanittee
Chairman Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) would fall t¥om $40 million to zero, a symbolic shot a! a fierce
Bush critic.
"[’he more than $3 trillion federal budget for 2009 that Bush will unveil is his final opportunity to shape
the priorities of file government before leaving o£tlce a year from now. Lawmakers and their aides say
Bush has little leverage left to ibrce his proposals on a recalcitrant Congress.
But even in the unlikely event that he were to get his way, the budget deficit would jump sharply, from
$163 billion in 2007 to about $400 billion in 2008 and 2009 -- partly the result of the new economic
stimulus plan. Such deficits would rival the record d elicit of $412 bilIion of 2004, though adminislration
allies a~ue that shortfalls of that size now rep~esent a smaller share of the overall economy and are thus
more manageable.
Still, the new budget underscores Bush’s inability to get control of spending over the cotu:se of his
seven-year tenure, a failure tha~ has concerned even his conservatives allies. The problem is projected to
get worse in coming years with the retirements of the baby-boom generation, a big obstacle to the
ambitious tax-cutting or spending plans of the leading presidential contenders.
Alice M. Rivlin, who served President Bill Clinton as budget director, pointed out that Bush "inherited a
very large surplus," but his "legacy from a fiscal point of view is having blov,~a an opportunity 1o
ameliorate fine long-run budget deficits."
White House officials and allies acka~owledge the long-term problem but pin the blmne on Congress for
ignoring fl~e president’s calls to control thc growth of Social Security and Medicare.
"The president recognized the big elephant in the room when it came to fiscal responsibilily, and he did
eve~’thing he could to get Congress to address it, but unfortunately Congress refused to deal with it,"
said A1 Hubbard, who recently left his pus| as Bush’s top economic pt>licy adviser.
Administration aides said Bush’s final year budget documents will very much reflect the major priorities
of his first seven years -- keeping his tax cuts in place and adding significant increases for defense and
4/22/2008
Page 7 of 22
counlerterrorism.
Bush will push Congress to keep discretionary domestic spending programs just below $1 tritlion next
year, with programs outside of defense aud homeland security growing less than 1 percent.
The president had success last year using his veto to force lawmakers lo trim back spending bills, but
this year Democrats are better positioned to simply wait for the next president, congressional aides said.
That may mean less ferocib’ thrm usual in the budget battle as both sides wait to see the results of
November’s election.
But the growth of programs such as Medicare ,and Medicaid are on atttomatic pilot unless Confess
vnftes a law to resta’ain them, a move Bush wants but one that appears highly unlikely, A Bush plan to
slow the growth of Medicare would save $170 billion over five years, and fully $43 billion of that would
come from Medicare Advantage, the private, managed care program that competes vzith the
government-run fee-for-service program for the elderly, an administration official said.
Bush has defended Medic~e Advantage from cuts proposed by Democrats, but this year, a senior
administration official said, he will propose payment freezes to health-care providers that will affect all
aspects of Medicare.
The budget wil! include $70 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, although Bush has requested
nearly $200 billion in 2008, much of which has yet to be approved by Congress. The five-year budget
will contain no war-funding requests beyond 2009, leaving questions about how much to spend to the
next president and Congress.
Officials said they expect the presidem’s base budget for defense spending to rise about 5 percent to
about $515 billion in fiscal 2009, reflecting the Pentagon’s plan to expand the Army and Marine Corps
ibr the ongoing wars in traq and Afghanistm~ and potential fi~t~re conflicls.
Administration officials described fierce behind-the-scenes baltles over spending in the final Bush
budget. Secreting of State Condoleezza Rice went back three times to the internal budget review" board -
- which includes Vice President Cheney, Treasury Secretary Item3’ M. Paulson Jr., Chief of Staff Joshua
B. Botten yard National Economic Council Director Keith Itennessy -- ~o appeal for more funds. In the
end, she also spoke directly with Bush to secure an increase of $700 million for the State Department,
6.5 percent over Iast year’s budget.
On the domestic fi’ont, the White House will call for trinmaing discretionary spending within the
Depam~ent of Health and Human Services by more than $2 billion, to $74.2 billion, according to budget
documents.
Among the reductions are more than $1 billion to programs run by the Administration for Ctfildren m~d
Families, including a $280 million hit to the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, a block
grant program that helps the poor pay heating and air-conditioning bills.
The budget plan argues for a $500 million reduction in the Social Sere, ices Block Grant program, which
helps slates protec! children from neglect and abuse, and pay for day care, adoption, health services,
foster care and other services tbr children and families.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would lose more than $430 million, including $27
million from its eftbrts to detect and control infectious diseases, and $28 million from chronic disease
prevention and health promotion. A $30t million program that trains 4,700 pediatricians and pediatric
specialists at children’s teacSing hospitals also would be eliminated, at a time when pediatric specialties,
such as rheumatology and pulmono[ogy, lace critical shortages.
4122/2008
Page 8 of 22
Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said Bush wilt seek to restore fimding for the embattled $1
biIlion-a-year Reading First pro~am, an initiative at the center of Ns signature No Child Left Behind
Act that has been besieged by allegations of eonllicts of interest. Congress slashed funding for the
program by 61 percent to $393 million in the 2008 budget.
"The president is going to work hard to get that funding restored, to ask for the billion dollars and help
Congress see the error of thei~ ways," Spe!lings said Friday in a conference call with reporters.
Money for the Sa±~ and Drug-Irree Schools Progam would be sliced fi’orn $294 million to $100 million,
and federal aid to aRerschool programs would take a hit.
Bush ~ill continue to boost Department of Homeland Security spending to tighten the borders. But
states and cities would see cuts of $1.5 billion from the $3.75 billion in grants ibr securit?,, law
enforcement, firefighters and emergency medical teams approved by Congress for this year. The White
House last year tried to slash state and local grants, but Congress ended up adding $1 billion instead.
Staff writers Maria Glod, Spencer Hsu, C.hristopher Lee, Josh !¥hite and Robin [frright cono’ibuted to
this report.
4422/2008
Page 9 of 22
Washing~on Post
4/22/2008
Page 10 of 22
with serving claJldren on Medicaid. Schools already have responsibility to transport all children, not just
Medicaid children, to schoo!. That should not be billed to Medicaid."
Health advocates and Democratic lawmakers criticized the chm~ge as a rash shit~ that ultimately could
result in fewer needy children connecting with he.alth services.
"This is a huge change in law," said Sara Rosenbaum, chairman of the Department of Health Policy at
the George Washington Urtiversity School of Public Health ,’rod Health Services. "This could have an
impact on the number of children enrolled in the program and the mlmber of children who are assisted in
getting health care. Whatever concerns there were about schools administering Medicaid... are totally
outweighed by wha! [the administration] has done here."
Rep. ~pJm.D... Di.nge_..!! (Mich.), the senior Democrat in the House, called on the administration to
"reconsider this misguided rule mid start working vdth Congress to better serve and suppmt America’s
most vulnerable children." Dingell and other lawmakers have introduced a bill to reverse the ruIe,
requiring Medicaid to cover certain administrative costs for schools and the cost of transporting children
with disabilities who go to school in specially equipped or staffed buses.
P.J. Maddox: chairman of the Department of Health Administration and Policy at ~~_l..aso.f~
Universi _ty, said the conflict highlights the challenge schools face wifl~ the growing cost of educating
children with disabilities. Federal law requires schools to provide services to disabled students, but the
l)deral government gives schools only a portion of the money needed to cover exta-a costs. Schools, she
said, have turned to Medicaid to help offset expenses.
"This Medicaid change cuts off that help, which leaves the school system holding the bag," Maddox
said. "Who pws for it? The school system will have to pay for it."
Medicaid officials contended, in their written response to public comments on fl~e rule, that cash-
strapped schoots have a "strong incentive to shift costs to Medicaid ~br activities that would have been
performed by schools in the normal course of their operation" and that schools should find other sources
for money. In recent years, reports from the inspector general of the Depogmen! 9[..H...e.a.!t..h..and_.Hu._man
Se.rv_i.ce.s have found that schools inappropriately sought reimbursement for school administrators’
salaries, capita! costs and even such items as antacids and lice. combs.
Educators acknowledged some problems with billing but said Medicaid should tighten rules and offer
more guidance, not simply cut offtl~e dollars.
MaD’lm~d officials are concerned about the fallout for Baltimore and Prince George’s schools.
"It’s a lot of impact on the two jurisdictions that have the largest numbers of the neediest children," said
Carol Ann Baglin, an assistant state superintendent in MaD’land. "They are going to have ~o lake funds
from somewhere else in a reD: tight fiscal time and put them into transportation."
Late last month, _L_os Ang.e.les school officials went to ..Capim_l__.H. ill to lobby againsl the rule, saying their
school syslem, the nation’s second largest, could lose $t0 million a year in reimbursement. John
DiCecco, director of the system’s co~rmmnity partners and Medi-Cal programs, said he expects to lay off
10 outreach workers who have hdped emoll thousands of children in Medicaid.
DiCecco said the system also uses Medicaid lhnds to encourage nonprofit and community groups to
donate to help the schools mn health clinics and oiler vision and dental screenings.
"There’s no question if this goes away, at least in Los Angeles, the health status of children will directly
suffer," DiCeceo said.
4/2212008
Page 1l of 22
412212008
Page 12 of 22
Washington Post
4/22/2008
Page 13 of 22
parents, the overall reaction to Rhee and Fenty’s school retbrm efforts has been a surprising q~iet above
a foundation of overwhehning support, as measured in last month’s .W_ a~bi_t!.~!~___P_ost poll.
If anythilag, the response to the closings was too quiet. "I wo~ald much rather come to a meeting where
people are passionate and yelling at me than those rooms I walked into and no one was there to speak for
any o[" the kids," Rhee says. "That was really alarming to me."
The chancellor explains the lack of parent involvement as a failure of the system. ’"l-hey don’t trust the
schools or the District, and I understand M~y. We treat them poorly, with incredible disrespect."
Improving how parents are treated and ratcheting up the academic content m’e two of Rhee’s big goals
once she works through the c!osings.
The system doesn’t have the money to add the full range of teachers Rhee wants in evm7 school, but this
fall, each school receiving students from closed buildings will be rewarded with several new positions
for art, music and ~’m teachers, as well as nurses, social workers and librarians. "fhat approach -- and
not what Rhee calls the "drill and kill" emphasis on test skills that too many systems have adopted in
response to the No Child Left Behind testing mania -- is what "creates achievement and teaches a love
of learning," she says.
At Ron Bro~aa Middle School, the rma-down Northeast facility where Fenty and Rhee announced the
final closings list, Principal Darrin Slade says parents understand the connection between shutting down
nearly empty buildings and improving progrmns in the remaining schools. In a building that can handle
983 students, Slade has but 268 - but rather than being closed, his school v~411 take in students from a
neighboring school. That wil! allow Slade to get khe art program he has long wanted~ improve his
teaching staff and work dowrt his building’s maintenance backlog.
"Rl~ee has already made more positive changes than a!l the previous superintendents I’ve seen
combined," Slade says.
~,Ylaen we finished talking, we were the only people left on the school’s second floor, which has been
largely unused for years. Come fall, it wilt be filled with children and teachers. Nobody will protest that.
4/22/2008
Page 14 of 22
Associated Press
SUSAN SNYDER
Sun Februa~" 3, 2008 08:02 EST
PttILADELPFIIA (AP)_ The third-grade students at Samuel Powel School in West Philadelphia took
their spots in a circle on the floor and eagerly opened their books, at~xious to resume reading Ballhawk,
a sto~" about a baseball team.
Their teacher, Joe Alberti, is 6-foot-7, mad even sitting down he still towered abo,~e his young charges.
"Yesterday, you had a pretty tough vocabulary word," Alberti said, referring to "’ball hawk," "" So I was
hoping we could look at it and see what that word means."
Hands shot up.
"A person that doesn’t want to share the ball:" guessed one child.
"A bird," oft~red another.
"’A bully," said a third.
Terrence Brown, who has very short hair and big, dark eyes, came closest to getting it right.
"’A person who always catches the ball wherever it goes," the 8-year-old said.
Using the classroom’s Intemet-conneeted smart board, Alberti looked up "’ball hawk" and showed
students the definition. "fkroughout the rest of the hour-long lesson, he a!temated between reading to
students and asking them what different words meant, what they lhought would happen next in the
stoW ,and how they" would feel if that happened to them.
His approach works.
In his classroom, nearly all of the 22 students are reading on grade level. The feat is remarkable, given
the dismal news coming out of the 167,000-student district. In Philadelphia, fewer than half of the
students read on grade ievel by the end of third grade, which educalors consider apivotal year in
making or breaking a student’s educational future.
At Powel, 96 percent of third graders read on grade level at fl~e end of last year, one of several
measures identitied as critical undo, the Philadelphia School Reform Commission’s education goals.
Powel, near the campuses of the University of Petmsylvania and Drexel UniversiD,, is one of the
district’s smallest elementmT schools, with 237 students in kindergarten thrmagh fomeh grade. Named
after fl~e ci .ty’s first mayor, Powel was opened in t 962 at the behest ofparenls and community, members
and for years was a desegregmion school.
]"he school has met federal progress targets under the No Child Left Behind law for the last four years -
another district goal.
"’It’s just lhe special environmenl of Powel that encourages kids to read, to be creative, to jusl be
interested in flaeir education," principal Marguerite Holliday said.
4122/2008
Page t5 of 22
Why does Powel succeed when so many other elementary- schoots fail? Is the aploroach to education a
model for the cib, or is there something unique at Powel that would be hard to replicate? The answer is
both.
Powel has smaller class sizes. While Philadelphia elementary schools have a limit of 30 students in
primary ~ades and 33 in upper grades, at Powel no class exceeds 26. The school’s administration has
used t’ederal dollars and other discretionary funds to keep classes small. Parents of children at Powei
also have pressed ciD officials to preserve funding.
Its teaching staff is stable, cohesive and t 00 percent certified. I~ts student body is very stable, unlike at
some schools in Philadelphia, where turnover is a third or more a yem’.
Parental involvement is strong. Parents often reimburse teachers for supplies bought out of pocket,
communicate regularly by e-mail with staff and hold staff-appreciation luncheons.
In the classrooms, educators say’ they emph,~ize literacy and nurtttre studems to care about reading
early on,
"We have had a very powerful library progrm~n," tltird-grade teacher Sarah I, abov said. "’Parents have
raised money for books. And teachers read stories to kids all the way up through the grades, continuing
thai kind of passion."
The school also has the bm~efit of drawing students from arotmd tt~e ci~’. About 50 percent come from
the 5mmediate Powelton-West Philadelphia area, Holliday estimates. The percentage of students fi’om
low-income families is also lower than the citywide average (59 percent versus 74 percent).
Powel also conducts school-wide projects, rich in literacy and focused on a theme. For the third- and
tburth-grade bioga’aphy projecl, students research a famous person, dress up in character and make a
presentad
"’In a way, it feels like a little prNate school in tIaat parents are very, very actix, e and have very high
expectations of us," said Labor, who lives a block from the school and has taught at Powel for 11 years.
Allyson Wilson agrees. She has three children at Powel -and a fourth who went on to attend Mastermind,
one of the district’s most pmsligious academic magnet sd~ools. Holtiday, the principal, estimates 40 to
60 percent of Powel s~udents go on to magne* schools.
"I had to admit to my husband that I was wrong," said Wilson, vice p,esident of the home and school
association and a convert to Powel. "They really care about educating the children here,"
Alberti, whose class read Ba!lhawk, is new to fl~e school this year. tte was chosen for the job by a
committee of PoweI educators and.parents. Powel is one ofT0 schools in the district where committees
select all new teachers for vacancies J’ather thma filling positions based on seniority.
His bright, colorful classroom is adorned with the work of students. Dozens of writings perused in large
print on construction paper hang on clothespin lines strung across the room. "Good morning, kids of
the future," a sign beckons at the entrance.
Alberti follows the district’s core curriculum~ but also adds many of his own lessons and projects. He
reads with students as a class and in small groups. With slower readers, he spends more time. Advanced
studems read books on their own and then discuss them with him.
Out of 46 students in Alberti’s two third-grade literacy classes, 14 were below grade level when they
s, arted the year. Tha{ number has been cut in half. He has told parents he expects all of them to be on
4.122/2008
Page 16 of 22
grade level by the end of this year, nex:t year at the latest. ,~berti will keep the same students for fourth
grade, known as looping.
"Third grade is the breaking point for many studenls," he said. "This is where they’re going to drop
down into the cracks ... or they’re going to soar."
Building student excitement for reading is key, said Alber~i, who is in a doctoral program for reading,
writing and literacy at the University of Pelmsylvania.
Terrence, the claild who guessed the meaning of"ball hawk," said he enjoyed books so much that he
read 10 to 12 a week a~ home, He is reading more than a year ahead of grade level, Alberti said.
Other students seem to be getting the message, too.
As Kasim L. Hanton Clark wrote on a paper, hanging from a clothespin: "Books are fun mad hot."
412212_008
Page 17 of 22
4/22/2008
Page 18:of22
But for some parents who successfiflly transferred their children, NCLB has been a ticket to a better
future.
Until-she secured a transfer in 2005, ~.~.o..1. _B.9.yd applied for charter school Iotteries and vm’iances to
move her son out of failing P.S. 64 i.a the Bronx, which she said had no school yard and focused heavily
on test p~ep to lift poor scores.
Boyd said she is thrilled with flae school where her son, Zachary, landed - _Elt__a .Baker in ~!an.!).a.t!_an. The
13-year-old now walks to ..C..e_~.a. I Pa~k for science classes and plays percussion instruments du~’ing
concerts at Co.lum. bi~ Uni~’ersity’s Miller Theater.
"I did a lot of research and I said, ’A-ha! This is the place for him,’" she said. "It makes for a difference,"
4122/2008
Page 19 of 22
Associated Press
Popular programs face budget squeeze
By ANDREW TAYLOR
Saturday, February 2, 2008
WASHINGTON (AP) - The spiraling gro~qh of Medicare and the high cost of renewing President
Bush’s tax cuts are squeezing popular education, h:ealth, housing and anti-poverty programs in the
budget blueprint that he hands lawmakers Monday.
Even with difficult-to-digest proposals to curb Medicare costs and kill programs to repair dilapidated
public housing, fund commutlily action agencies and provide food to the elderly poor, Bush’s $3 trillion
budget will project deficits arotmd $400 billion this year and ne.’d.
Bush’s submission is already absorbing brickbats from Democrats castigating him for inheriting a
government in surplus and leaving Washington wifl~ a budget deficit that is likely to break the $413
billion record set four years ago, once war bills and the cost of giving the economy a fiscal jolt with tax
rebate checks are factored in.
"The next president is going to inherit a colossal mess because of the fiscal irresponsibility of this
president," Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., chairman of the Budget Committee said Saturday.
Bush’s budget will demonstrate a way to produce balance in four years and still renew tax cuts on
income, investments and people irtheriting large estates -- cuts now scheduled to expire at the end of
2010. The cost of renewing those tax outs exceeds $300 billion by 2013, according to congressional
scorekeepers.
But he’ll only be able to predict that balance by cutting spending in ways that Congress -- whether
controlled by Republicans or Democrats --has rejected many times before. After his proposal to kill or
significantly cut 141 programs to sa~,e $12 billion was rejected by Congress last year, Bush is upping the
ante by 50 percent with an even more controversial plan. And his bid to squeeze $178 bilIion from
Medicare over five )’ears has no chance on Capitol Hill, even lhough the program would still grow by 5
percent a year under his proposal.
Despite a worsening deficit picture, caused in large part by slumping tax revenues as the economy sours,
Congress is likely to take no action this year to reverse ~e tide. No one likes to take painful steps to
reduce federal spending in a presidential election year, and lawmakers b, pically don’t defer to unpopular,
lame duck presidents.
"This will be a placeholder year," Co:trad said. "Thars the reality."
While the Bush budget will receive a dead-on-arrival reception from lawmakers and be overshadowed
by "ruesday’s presidential primaries, administration officials have been promoting its more appealing
elements in recent days.
Funding for the State Children’s Health ]lasurmlce Program, the subject of an intense battle with
Democrats last year, would iucrease by almost $20 billion over the nexl five years. An additional $6
billion is requested to finish a massive project to protect New Orleans from flooding. And the Food mad
Drug Administration would get a larger-than-average budget increase to send FDA stair overseas to
inspect food and drugs imported into the United States.
Bush also backs $2 billion over three years to help get cleaner and more efficient energy technology to
big polluters like India and China.
4/22/2008
Paze 20 of 22
Other details the administration might not be as eager to promote have been leaking out from a variety
of sources with particular knowledge about specific areas of the budget and from some budget planning
documents seen in advance,
When the fulI document is out Monday, the full wrath of interest groups will be felt. Hospitals and other
health care providers are already protesting cuts to Medicare and the Medicaid h~lth care program
the poor and disabled, Mille advocates for the poor vow to again reverse huge cuts to social services
block gants to states and funding for nonprofit groups that help the poor.
Aft~cted indust~’ies can be cotmted on to protest user fees, even those as small as a 50-cents-per-flight
ticket tax to finance screening machines for the Transportation Security Administration that are intended
to detect explosives being smuggled aboard airplanes.
The Bush forecast for a balanced budget by 2012 also is likely to strike many as unrealistic, depending
as it does on the assumption that there will be no additional no war costs for Afghanistan or lraq after a
$70 billion infusion for next year.
~Itae White House budget also does not accotmt tbr the huge cost of preveming the alternative minimum
tax from hitting millions and n~illions of upper middle-class taxpayers after 2009. The White House and
congressional Republicans blasted House Democrats as raising taxes for trying to offset AMT relief by
closing a loophole on offshore tax havens; Bush’s budget effectively assumes AMT relief after a one-
year "patch" for next year is financed by tax increases elsewhere.
Elsewhere, cuts in the Bmh budget would eliminate a $302 million program that gives grants to
children’s hospitals to subsidize medical education. A $300 million program for public health
improvement projects would be eliminated, while grants to improve health care in rural areas would be
cut by 87 percent.
The Centers for Disease Control’s budget would face a 7 percent reduction of $433 miIlion. The budget
for a program 1o treat and monitor the health of first respo~aders and others exposc~ to toxins at the
World Trade Center after the Sept. 11 attacks would be cut by 77 percent,, from $108 million this year to
$25 million in 2009.
The National Institutes of I-Iealth, which funds health research grants, would see its budget frozen at
$29.5 bilIion.
Houston Chronicle
Feb. 2, 2008, lI:29PM
Some schools saying no to federal dollars
Forgoing funds provides greater range in teaching
By SUSIE PAKOUA VANG, Mec[atchy-tribune
LINDSAY, CALIF, -- Last fall, ane .little elemental~" school irt thi.s poor t~rm town did something
startling: It said no to nem’ly $250,000 in federal funds.
In exchange, Lincoln E[ementury gained something its teachers considered even more valuable: more
independence.
"We want to do a better job than we’ve been able to do and we want to do that by being flexible,"
4122/2008
Page 21 of 22
Lincoln is among a small nurnber of U.S. schools --no one can say how many for sure -- that have
gained flexibility- in following federal education mandates by turning down Title I funds.
In rare cases, whole school districts have rejected Title I as a way to opt out of the federal academic
accountability system set up by the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act. But most heed the warnings of state
and federal educators who caution that the cost of giving up Title I can be steep.
The federal dollars are distributed to state education departments, which then give the money to school
districts based on poverty and low test scores. Districts then decide which schools receive Title I
funding, with priority given to schools with 75 percent or more low-income students. Funds can be used
for staff development, supplemental materials and literacy and math coaches.
In return, schools receiving the money must show test results demonstrating that an ever-escalating
share of their student bodies meet proficiency standards in English and math.
No Child Left Behind has met strong opposition since it became law. Some educators and parents say
the program is underftmded and ibrces teachers to follow a standard script, rather than adapt to the needs
of their students.
"Many teachers no longer can be immvative in their leaching," said Mike Green, a California Teachers
Association representative and Lindsay Unified teacher. "A lot of that has to do with the fact that you
are required 1o teach to the ~est."
District officials took the unusual step of giving up $243,000 -- out of its budget of $4 million ~ to IYee
the school from Title I mandates because too much time was spent on papepa, ork, when time could be
bette~ spent on more i~movativc teaching efforts.
Kliegl said Lincoln was a good candidate for the change because overall it is a hi-oh-achieving school,
but there are groups of students, such as English learners, who miss federal targets. This calls for a more
flexible approach, she said.
Tom Rooney, Lindsay Unified’s assistant superintendent for curriculum and instruction, said No Child
Left Behind requires a great deal of staff time on pape~vork.
"That is necessaD’ for some schoots, and it’s necessal-y fbr some districts," Rooney said. "We’ve made
file decision that that’s nol a necessary burden to put on (Lincoln)."
]n past years officials spent Ti!le I money’ on computers, learning programs and literacy and math
coaches to try’ ~o meet the standards.
Now, Lincoln’s staff will use creative student programs that teachers would not have had time for under
4/22/2008
Page 22 of 22
provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act. These include teaching via the Interact, far-ranging field
trips and a renewed focus on science and the arts.
"We want our kids to go out on the road, go to the ocean,, go to the mountains," Cm~by said. She wants
students to appreciate music and art, which often were dropped from cIassrooms in order to focus
entirely on improving test scores trader the No Child Left Behind Act.
"An eft~ctive citizen is a person who is fluenl in the arts. It’s not just about reading and writing," she
said.
Canby said she also wants to see a strong focus on science, which previously took a back seat to English
and math.
Although the school no longer is obligated to meet ti~deral mandates, llae campus still must meet the
state’s Academic Performance Index benchmarks, which measure annual academic growth. Index scores
range from 200 to 1,000, with all schools working toward 800 or better.
Lincoln is still far from the state goal. Last August, test results from the California Department of
Education showed Lincoln dipped 38 points from its previous score of 691.
’Verb’ punitive law’
It’s unclear how many other schools nationwide have followed the same path. but Lincoln is not alone.
Thousands of miles away, the Communiff Consolidated School District 21 board in Wheeling, Ill., has
rejected about $250,000 in Title I funds for the past three years, said Kate Hyland, an assistant
superintendent. She said consultants were assigned to underperforming schools, which resulted in
several meetings, but little progress.
"It’s a very. punitive law ....
Our board really took a stand in saying, ’We are philo~phically opposed to
tl~e lmv,’ " Hylm)d said.
While rejecting Title I isn’t yet a trend, "it’s potentially the front end of what could be a wider
movement," said Jeffrey Henig, a professor of political science and education at Columbia UniversiD
Teachers’ College in New York City.
Janie Castro, Lincoln Etementary’s Parent Teacher Organization president, said she supports the new
vision lbr her school. She noted Canby prepared fl)d school to do wilhout Title I, partly because she used
previous TitIe I money to buy long-term resources, such as computers and software. Said Castro: "We
know that she’s going to m~e lhis work."
4/22/2008
Private - Spellin.,gs;,_Mar~laret
From: Yudof, Samara
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 1:22 PM
To: Anderson, Chrisbj; Aud, Susan; Benton, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Cariello, Dennis; Casarona,
Emily; Chlouber, Patricia; Cohn, Kristine; Colby, Chad; Cotvin, Kelly; Davis. Jim; Dmytrenko,
Orysia; Dunn, David; Earling, Eric; Eitel, Robert S.: Evans, Wendy; Evers, Bill; Flowers, Sarah;
Foxley, Donna; Galko, Vincent; Gadland, Lavin; Gribble, Emily; Halaska, Terrell; Hancock,
Anne; Hatada, Tort; Heard, Denby; Hervey, Tina; Jones, Diane; Kuzmich, Holly; Lepore,
Kristen; MacGuidwin, Katie; Maddox, Lauren; Private - Spellings, Margaret; McGrath, John;
Mcnitt, ].ownsend L; Mesecar, Doug; Morffi, Jessica; Neale, Rebecca; Oldham, Cheryl; Pil~s,
Elizabeth; Ridgway, Marcie; Robb, Curly; Rosenfelt, Phil; Ruberg, Casey; Scheessele, Marc;
Sentance, Michael; Skandera, Hanna; Smith, Valarie (SRR); Stearns, Hannah; Tada, Wendy;
Talbert, Kent; Terrell, Julie; Toomey, Liam; Tracy Young; Truong, Anh-Chau; Tucker, Sara
Martinez; Williams, Cynthia; Wright, Christopher Wurman, Ze’ev; Young, ]racy; Yudof,
Samara; Zoellick, Todd
Subject: 02.02.08 In the News
Attachments: 020208 In the News.doe; Picture (Metafile); Picture (Metafile}; Picture (Metafile)
020208 In the
’,lows, doe (121 KB,..
1) Associated Press: Bush education budget is level, seeks boost for reading program and vouchers
(N an~, Z.ckerbrod)
2) The New York Times: Bush to Seek Budget Cuts, Except in Child Health (Robert Pear)
3) Washington Post; Bush Proposes Giving D.C. $32 Million More To Boost School Reform (David
Nakamura)
4) The Associated Press: Bush administration proposes boos~ i, D.C. school fundin
5) Associated Press: Fightover No Child Left Behind cash continues
6) The New York Times: Appeal of Challenge to ~No CbUd’ Law (Sam Dillon)
7) Education Week (The School Law Biog); Spellings to Appeal 6th Circuit’s NCLB Ruling (Mark
Walsh)
8) The Associated Press: Spellings in Alabama, announces plan for reading program increase (Desiree
HImter)
9) Montgomery, Advertiser: $1B coming for reading program for children (Jenn Rowell)
10) Birmingham Nine’s: 1L;.S. education secretal7 says President Bush will ask for full funding for federal
reading program; Budget cuts will cost state $11 million (Marie Leech)
11) WSFA NBC-TV - Montgomery-, A]a.: U.S. Secretary of Education in MontgomeD" to Support
Alabama No Child Left Behind Program
12) Washington Post: D.C. School Closings List Is Revised (Theola L~bb~ and David Nakamura)
13) Washington Post (Editorial): Narrowing the Gap; Montgomery school programs are.getting the job
done.
114) The New York Times: lflt’s Tuesday, It Must Be Spanish ~Iillary Chura)
Associated Press
Bush education budget is level, seeks boom for reading program and vouchers
Februa~3’ 2, 2008
By ROBERT PEAR
WASHINGTON - Dozens of popular health, housing ~d education programs would be eliminated or sharply
reduced under the budget that President Bush plans to announce on Monday. But he would significantly increase
spending on the ’_State Childrens Health insurance Program, the focus of a huge fi~t with Conga-ess last year.
Michael O. I,eavitt, the secretary of health and human services, said Friday that the president would request
$19.7 billion in additional federal allotments to the states for coverage of children li’om low-income families in
the next five years. Spending on the program from 2009 to 2013 wmdd total $45.1 billion.
In an inter~’iew, Mr. Leavitt said the president’s budget would allow the progrmn to meet its "original intent" of
covering children with family incomes up to tvdce the poverty level, or $42,400 for a family of fern’. Abom 18
states cover children with family incomes above that level.
The new proposal is midway between the $5 biIlion increase requested by the president Iast year and ~he $35
bitlion increase that Congress provided in bills vetoed by Mr. Bush in October and December.
Bush administration officials were telling Congress as recently as last month that a $5 billion increase would be
enough, mad man~" Republicans relied on that assurance. It is not dear when the White House concluded that
$19.7 billion was needed, a question that law-makers are s~e to pursue in hearings.
In his budget, Mr. Bush sets forth a detailed blueprint for spending $3 trillion in the 2009 fiscal year, the largest
mnount ever requested by a president.
Mr. Bush foresees a budget surplus in 20t2, but While House officials said the deficit would be roughly $400
billion a year in 2008 and 2009, far more than the $163 billion deficit recorded last year.
The budget would increase border security and provide money to protect New Orleans against devastating
storms like Hun’icane Katrina
<h~tp:&~pics.nytimes~c~m/top/reference/timest~pi~s/subjects/h/h~rricane~katrina/index.htm~?in~in~=nyt-
classifier-’-.
The administration is requesting $5.8 billion to complete work on levees and tlood walls in the New Orleans
But budget documents show that Mr. Bush will also propose deep cuts in a wide range of domestic programs.
Spending on poison conn’o[ centers would be cut 62 percent, ~o $10 million. Rural health programs, a favorite of
s
many senators, would be reduced 87 percent, to $16.9 million.
A special health program for rescue workers and vohmteers who responded to the terrorist attacks on the World
Trade Center in 2001 would be cut by 77 percent, to $25 million, even though the administration has said that
many workers were exposed to ::tu~precedented levels of’risk" for lung disease and other illnesses.
h,h’. Bush’s budget would end the Comrnunil3, Se~wices Block Grant, a $654 million program that provides
housing, nutrition, education and job sen, ices to l ow-incorne people.
The budget would also end special prog~’ams to care for people with Alzheimer’s disease and to treat people
with traumatic brain injury. Mr. Bush would eliminate t)deral tunneyfor a new "~patient navigator" progxam,
which coordinates care for people with cancer and other serious illnesses. The administration contends that
these programs are ineffective or duplicate other government initJallves.
Mr. Bush proposes a 22 percent cut in the Low-Income ttome Energy Assistance Program, which provides $2,6
billion to help people pay heating bills. Many la,,~nakers want to expand the program at a time when oil costs
are soaring.
The budget responds to a bipartisan clamor lbr new safeguards to ensure the safety of food and drugs.
Mr. Bush is requesting $2.4 billion for the Food and Drug Administration
<http:/ /t~pies.nytimes.c~mA~p/reference/timest~pics/~rganizati~ns/f/f~d-and-dr~g-adminis~ati~n/index.htm~
?inline--nyt-org>, up 5.7 percent from the current level. Secretary Leavitt said some of the money ~vould be used
"to hire and deploy F.D.A. personnel in foreign coun~a’ies, so they could inspect food, drt~gs and ~nedical de,~,iees
destined for lhe United States.
Mr, Bush wants to end the Hope VI housing program, which upgrades severely dilapidated punic housing. The
[louse voted two weeks ago to renew the program for eight years.
Representative Spencer Bachus of Alabama, one of 53 Republicans w!~o voted for lhe bill, said: "The program
has been a success. It has eliminated some of the most dangerous and distressed public housing in the country
and created livable, mixed-income communities.:’
The White I-louse wmats to eliminate spending tbr more than a dozen education programs, including Even Start,
which promotes family literacy; grants to the slates tier classroom technology; Supplemental Fducation
Oppot-tunity Grants, for needy undergraduates; and a scholarship program named for flae chaimxan of the Senate
Appropriations Committee, Robert C. Byrd
<ht1p://t~pics~nytimes.c~mA~p/referen~e/tim~st~pics/pe~p~e/b/r~bert~c-byrd/index.htm~?in~ine=nyt-per>,
Democrat of West Virginia.
the secretary of education, said Friday that the president would request $1 billion for the Reading First program,
to teach poor children to read by the third grade. Congress em the program to $393 million this year ~ter federal
investigators tbund confliels of interest, cronyism and bias in the awarding of grants.
Ms. Spellings said she hoped lawmakers would "see the error of their ways.’:
Alan Finder contributed reportingfi’om New York.
Washington Post
Bush Proposes Giving D.C. $32 Million More To Boost School Reform
By David Nakamura, Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 2, 2008; B02
The White House <http:!/x~a~,~a’.washii~,Oonpost.condac2/relateditopic/The+White+House?fid=informline>
plans to announce Monday that it has proposed giving the District $32 million in additional federal funding this
year for public education, including a special $20 million payment aimed at helping Mayor Adrian M. Fentg
-<ht~p:l/v~v.washingt~np~st.c~m/ac2/re~ater~jt~pi~/Adrim~+Fen~2tid=inf~rm~ine> restructure public schools,
federal officials said.
The recommendation, contained in the White House’s overall proposed D.C, budget, direcls the funds toward a
series of enhancements for the nearly 50,000-student public system and the 20,000-student pnblic charter school
program.
Among the proposals for the traditional schools is an incentive-pay program designed to reward teachers whose
students meet specific performance goals, D.C. Schools Chancellor Michette A. Rhee
<http:/twww.washingtonpost.comlac2/related/topicfMichelle+Rhee?tid=informline> said. About $5 million
would go loward replicating successful charter schools, and $7 million would go toward beefing up pro~ams in
low-performing schools.
"The package includes an infusion of resources to jump-start the mayor’s robust reform strategy for D.C. Public
schools," U.S. Education Secretary Margaret Spellings_
<http://www.washin‘~t~-~-Q1~st.c~m/ac2/re~ated/t~pic/Margaret+Spe~ings?tid=inf~rm~ine> said in a stalement.
"’lllese targeted invesunents are a critical catalyst for the types of innovation that have been lacking for too long
in the Nalion’s Capital," FenD (D) said in a letter to Congress supporting the White House’s D.C. budget
request. "These initiatives will spur improved instruction and services, directly benefiting students in the
classroom."
Typically, the school system fimnels $120 million a year in federal timds to its schools. In 2006, the U.S.
Department of Education <http://w~w.w~shingt~np~st.c~m/a~2/re~ated~t~pi~‘~V.S.+Departnaent+~f+Education?
tid--informline> declared that the school system was a "high risk" tbr mismanaging federal fluids.
District officials called the proposed influx of new money a breakthxough and said il shows the federal
government has conlidence in the Fenty administration’s school reform plans. The budget requires approval
from Congress.
Since Fenl3’ downgraded the Board of Education and took control of the school system in June, he has been
working on a number of changes. Yesterday, Fenty and Rhee announced a revised list of 23 schools that will be
closed, including 16 this fall.
Rhee’s office is working to increase the public schools’ fiscal 2009 budget by about $17 million in local funds:
to a total of $794.6 million in local money.
kinder the proposed federal education budget, the city would get $18 millim~ in each of three c .ategories: for
public schools, for charters and for the D.C. Opportunity," Scholarship program. Each of those received between
S13 million and $14 million last year.
An additional $20 million would come to the District in a one-time pa)q-nent to support the Fenty
adminislration’s reform efforts. That money will be earmarked to help support and train teachers and principals,
develop new programs lbr low-performing schools, improve data reporting lbr student accountability and help
start the teacher incentive-pay program.
The District schools have not had an incentive-pay proglam, R_hee said, but she is in the process of developing
one, in conjunction with the Washington Teachers’ l.Jrtion. She declined to talk about specifics but said support
from the White House shows that federal officials think she is serious about improving performance.
"When I say performance pay, I will not water it dowal mad create ridiculous incentives that don’t move student
achievement," Rhee said. "I do not think it’s normal for the federal government to give this amount to a school
district, but my track record of doing different things made them believe I could do this."
The Associated Press
2008-02~02 04:37:11.0
The funding includes a one-time $20 million payment to support Mayor Adrian Fenty’s school reform ettbrt,
The fimding would help start an ineentive-p~" program designed to ~reward teachers whose students meet
performtmco goals and would Ihnd iraining for teachers and principals. The money also would target new
programs at low-performing schools.
In a statement, U.S. Education Secretar7 Margaret Spellings <http://wwcw.examiner.comiSubject-
Margaret Spellings.htmI> says lhe money willjump-starl the mayor’s school retbrm strategy.
10
Associated Press
Plaintiffs include the Pontiac, Mich., school district and eighl districts in Texas and Vermont, along with
National Education Association affiliates in several states.
They claim federal funding is not keeping pace with additional mandates required by No Child Lef~ Behind:
requiring schools to pay from local and state sources to keep UP-
A message seeking comment was left with the Natio~ml Education Association on Friday afternoon.
11
The New York Times
February 2, 2008
One month after a three-judge panel of a federal appeMs court revived a legal challenge to the federal No Child
Left Behiad law, Educatiort Sec/etary Margaret Spelling~ said she would ask the United States Court oi’Appeals
lbr the Sixth Circuit, in Cincinnati, to convene a larger pane[ to reconsider that ruling, h~ its 2-to-1 ruling on Jan.
7, the Sixth Circuit said that school districts in Michigan and sever’A other states had been justii’ied in their 2005
suit that argued the law requil"ed them to pay for testing and other programs without providing sufficient federa!
money.
Education Week
Spellings said that U.S. Solicitor General Paul D, Clement, M~o is the top appellate lawyer in the Department
of Justice, has authorized an appeal asking that the full U.S. Court of Appeals for ~he 6th Circuit, in
Cincinnati, rehear the case of Pontia~ School Districl v. Spellings.
In her statement today, Spellings said the administration’s appeal to the full 6th Circuit "will be filed shortly."
"As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I strongly disagree with the ruling, and believe that if the decision were to
stand, it could undermine efforts to im prove the education of our nation’s children, in particular those
students most in need," Spellings said in the statement. "NCI.B is not an unfunded mandate. It is a voluntaD’
compact between the states and the federal govermnent, which asks that in exchange fbr federal tax dollars,
resulls be demonstrated. This investment is netting solid results and creating an opportunity for ever5’ child in
America to ha’¢e access to a quality education."
l’he School Law Blog covers news and analysis on legal developmenls affecting schoola:, educators, and
parents. Mark ~L~h has been covering &gal issues in education for more than 15 years f)r Education Week
He writes about school-related cases b7 the L~S. S~preme Court and in lower courls.
~3
The Associated Press
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) - Educators, legislators and state ot’fieial.~ met with U.S. Education Secretary
Margaret Spellings Friday for a round-table discussion about No Child [.eft Behind that was at tmaas critical and
complimentary, but a!ways candid.
"I dlought it was s~imulating conversation. I think it was straight from the heart and from proIi~ssional people
who are in education eve~ day," s~ate Superintendent of Education Joe Morton said after the Montgomery.
meeting.
"I think it gives (Spelli~gs) some concrete, hands-on things that can be done to improve the law - not theory or
philosophical things - but productive and constructive (input)," he said.
Spellings’ visit was one of several stops she is making throughout the country to discuss the successes and
shortcomings of the federal act that was passed in 2002 and has been unpopular with many public school
teachers.
She said there have been a lot of common threads in her conversations with educators around the count~’, with
some of the key issues involving the way students m’e tracked, supplemental services that are offered and
changing what now amounts to a pass/fail system for schools.
But despite all the improvements that need to be made, Spellings ~aid, the law has produced some positive
results.
"There’s a focus on every. kid and uvery group of students so we’re no longer coment with: ’Average everybody’s
achievement together and say ’Hooray for us’," she said. "We are going to look at every kid - every group of
Hispanic kids, African-American kids, special ed kids, and we’re going to hold them all to a high slandard and
that’s proficiency by 2014."
Rhonda Neal Waltman, who was the assistant superintendent of Mobile schools wh,n the law went into effect,
said the positives outweigh the bad.
"[ do think it ~vas a catalyst Ibr change for us," said Waltman, who attended the round-table and shared about her
experiences. "A disadvantage of it is we had focused a lot on testing before we realized if we focus on rigorous
curriculum ~he tests will take care of themselves.
"Do we need to tweak it? Absolutely. Does it need more funding? Absolutely. But don’t throw it away," she
said.
Spellings also a~mounced President Flush’s plans to ask Congress to raise fimding tbr the nationwide Reading
Fi~st program to at least $1 billion when he makes his budget request for fiscal year 2009 on Monday.
The program serves low-ineorne children and saw its budget slashed by 60 percent to $393 million in the cun’ent
fiscal year. An Education Department inspector general’s report last year showed mismanagement and conflicts
of interest in the program in its early years.
Chad Colby, a spokesman for Spellings, said the secretary has accepted and implemented the inspector general’s
14
recommendations and the problems ha~’e been fixed.
"Everybody that was involved in implementation is no longer with the department," he said.
"Our position has always been: Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water," Colby said. "You’ve got an
effeclive program that is llelping. You shoukha’t throw away a federa! program because of early management
problems with implementation."
Morton agreed, saying the federal cuts to the program - which mnount lo about $10 million for Alabama - would
be especially dire now with millions in state cuts looming.
"People are devastated, trttly devastated v,,Sth the cut. You could hear it in their voices today," he said. ’Tm
hopeful thai it’s a one year cut .... I hope it’s rectified when they adopt ~he next budget."
15
Montgomery Advertiser
UoS. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings told listeners at Alabama’s State House that President Bush witl
include $1 billion in the federal budget for the Reading First program when he introduces his budget Monday.
She also conceded that the No Child Left Behind law might work better i fit paid attention to how far behind the
schools actually were.
The Reading First program, which serves low-income children, had its budget slashed by 60 percent to $393
million during the current fiscal year, Milch mnotmted to about a $10 million cut for Alabmna.
Gov. Bob Riley, Alabama la~anakers ~nd other educators at the Friday roundtable meeting said the increase in
funds would be important to the state.
Joseph Morton, state superintendent of education, said the devastating effect the cut had on the state could be
even more devastating if thnds weren’t restored for the upcoming fiscal year because of the budget problems the
A]abarna Legislature faces.
Most agreed fl~at the No ChiId Left Behind law" would be more effective ifil didn’t just reward schools on a
pass/fail basis_
Cun’ently, schools either meet standards or they don’t. NCI, B rewards the ones who do. But there is no
differentiation made among those flint don’t -- even Schools cl~ronically below standards that make significant
progress.
"Is it problem free? Absolutely noti" Spellings said of the program. "We are pleased, but not satisfied."
Spellings said because NCLB does not track progress, it hurts some slates such as Alabama that have some
schools that may not meet standards yet, but have come a hmg way toward reaching them.
The group said Alabama is definiteIy making progress,
The most recent National Assessment of Educational Programs, or NAEP, found that Alabama’s fourth-~aders
had their highest gains ever in math and reading, and eighth-graders achieved their highest scores in math since
the assessment was established about 30 years ago.
Alabama is -also one of nine states to reduce the math achie,,’ement gap between white and Hispanic sludents in
grades 3 through 8 and high school.
The intense focus on elementary students is getting the intended results, the educators said, but more progress
needs to be made.
In the last five years, fourth-graders have shown increased achievemenl in reading and math, but eighth-graders
haven’t shown the same progress. In both cases, Alabama students performed below the national averages.
Spellings and Tonmay Lcdbetter, principal of Buckhorrt High School in Madison County’, said NCLB needs to
pay more attention to middle and high school students and fi~at the drop-out rate is one of the issues that needs
to be addressed.
Supplemental services, which Spellings said is "Washington speak for tuloring," also need to become a wiority.
Morton ,said tutoring should be the first option for dtudents, fo!lowed by school choice.
t7
Birmingham News
U.S. education secretary, says President Bush will ask for full funding for federal reading program
Budget cuts will cost state Sll million
MONTGOMERY - President Bush will ask Congress on Monday to restore full funding in 2009-10 for a
federal program that officials believe has helped Alabama students make significant gains in reading, U.S.
Education Secretm7 Margare~ Spellings announced Friday.
"l:he federal Reading First program will take a 60 percent funding cut this year, meaning Alabama witl get just
$7 millJon for the Alabama Reading .First Initiative in the fall, instead of the $ ! 8 million it gets now.
"The hugely bad news is ARF1, but the good news is that Confess is increasing Title I funds, so let’s bring
these two together to continue Reading First," Spellings said at a roundtable discussion vdth Guy. Bob Riley,
state school Superintendent Joe Morton and several educators and legislators.
The federal reading program is for students in grades kindergarten fl~a’ough three and is targeted at schools
with high poverty levels. Such schools also receive federal Title I money, which is based on the number of
students on the free and reduced-price lunch progrmn.
The Alabama Reading Initiative, which is different from the federal Reading First Initiative, has l~een in
elementary schools since 1997. Federal educators used AJabama’s successful reading program as a model for
the federal progrmn, which began in 2002.
While the Alabmna Reading Initiative is in all elementary schools, the federal program serves 95 schools in 46
school systems throughout the state.
Riley said he will not support funding cuts for the state’s initiative.
"The budget I’m scndiJag not only says not to cut funding for reading, but to increase it," he said.
Spellings noted that the reading initiatives combined ha’,,e helped raise reading lest scores. Alabama posted
the highest gains in fourth-grade ~eading last year on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, also
known as the nation’s repo~’~ cald.
"When we looked at the NAEP scores, we thought, "This has to be a mistake,’" she said. "Your reading scores
stand out in the nation."
Mor~on said despite the funding cuts fl~is year, Alabama is on the fight track.
"We aren’t where we want to be: but we are makiug great progress," he said. "Alabm~a is never going hack.
It’s only upward from here."
Spellings also discussed the No C~ild Left Behind legislation, which was up [br reauthorization last year but
wasn’t reauthorized. She said the act needs to be tweaked, and she hopes it conies up for reauthorizafion this
year.
"No Child Left Behind is here to stay. It does not expire," Spellings said. "But it’s nol problem-free."
Rep. Mac Gibson, R-Prattville, said he thinks Congress should offer states more money for No Child Left
Behind requirements.
"I think the tEds could have helped a little more financially for what the?, want us to do," he said.
Morton said he thinks Alabama is better off for having the law. Before, the state averaged test scores based oll
all students. The law requires stales to break students into subgroups based on race, income level and special
education.
The new data allow educators to see how well every, student performs and what groups of studems need
improvement.
Spellings told state officials Friday that Alabama is one of just nine states to reduce lhe performance gap
between white and Hispm~ic students, to which the room broke out in applause.
~9
WSFA NBC-TV - IVlontgomery~ Aia.
U,S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and Alabama Governor Bob Eiley held an education policy
roundtable on Friday morning to discuss the No Child Left Behind and priorities for 2008.
Spellings spoke with lawmakers and leaders about how the federal government can partner with the state and
districts to support innovation and get every child on grade level or better,
He says he’ll ask for more funding -- not a cut -- For the program.
2O
Washington Post
21
In an interview, Rhee said the revisions were more The result of individual, arguments she heard in private
meetings with parents and others than large community, gatherings and demonstrations.
"None of the changes were driven by people coming out to big meetings," Rhee said_ "The way that was more
productive was when small groups came to me and said, ’Here are our concerns, here are our ideas.’ "
For example, after D.C. Council
<http://www.washingt~np~st.c~rrda~2~re~a~ed/t~pic/C~unei~+~f+the+District+of+~umbia~tid=informline>
member Jack Evans (D-Ward 2) <http://www.washingonl~ost.co~rdac2/relatedttopic/Jack+Evans+(Politician)?
fid=informline> and neighborhood leaders said Show’s large campus could be a community" resource, Rhee
reversed course and proposed closing Garnet-Patterson instead of Shaw. Sha~,?s large athletic fields, she said,
could attract students looking for activities and cut down on truancy.
But Florence Harmon, an advisor5, neighborhood commissioner in the West En4.~og~" Bottom neighborhood,
where Stevens Elementary is located, said her argumcnls agains~ closing the school went unheeded when she
met with Rhee. Harmon said she cited its academic programs and historical importance to the conmmnity ~ the
first school for freed slaves.
"They made the decision completely on enrollment. ]hey didn’t take into accotmt the quality of the educational
programs, because if they did, Stevens would s~ill be open," Harnlon said.
The new proposal calls for Benning students to move to Smolhers Elementary in Nortl~east, while students from
Merritt would go to Ronatd H. Brown in Northeast. In Northwest, students from Garnet-Patterson would attend
Shaw, and Park View students would attend Brace-Monroe. All four receiving schools had been on the closing
list proposed in November but were taken off under the new plan.
A public hearing on the proposal is set for 6 p.m. Feb. 27 at McKinley Technology High School in Northeast.
Council members, who criticized Fenb’ and Rhee for not consulting with them before releasing their original
proposal, were persona!ly briefed by Rhee and Fenty on Thursday.
"Obviously it was difficult from the beginning because of a lack of communication, but the process got better as
we went along," said Chairman Vincent C. Gray
<http:/iwww.washinNonpost.con~’ac2/relatedltooicfVincent+Grav?tid=infornaline> (D). "This sends a message
that [the administration was] flexible."
Althoughcouncil member Jim Graham <http:i/w~vw.washin~or~l~OSt.com/ac2/related¢topic/Jim+Graham?
tid=informline>. (D-Ward 1 ) said he was glad that Bruce-Monroe and Shaw in his district were spared, he said
he would fight for Park View and Ganaet-Patterson. "The squeak-y wheel, the schools lold that they were going
to close, were obviously very’ convincing," he said. "We’re going to make our case."
Park View is an anchor of the. neighborhood, he said, and Garnet-Patterson was the first African American
junior hi~ school in the city°
Council member Harry Thomas Jr. <http://www.washingtonpost.com]ac2!related/topidHarr).,+Thomas+Jr.?
tid=inforrntine> (D-Ward 5) said he still wants Rhee to take Bunker Hill Flementary and Backus Middle
<http://~w~w.washin~tonp~st.c~m/ac2/reIated/t~pic/Backus+Midd~e+Sch~?tid=inf~m1~ine> of the list and also
M.M. Washington because it is the ci~"s only vocational high school.
Thomas, who has pushed tbr more inclusk~n in the process, said he t’el~ more "optimistic" about being heard by
Rhee and Fenty.
"They kept us in the loop a lot better than they did belbre," he said.
Thomas said that wil| nol deter him fiom going forward with legislation that wouid require more input from the
22
public on school closures and council oversight of the disposal of school properb’.
Staff writers Michelle Boorstein, Nikita S~ewart and Debbi ~qlgoren contributed to this report.
Washington Post
Editorial
February 2, 2008
YOUR MONEY
By HILLARY CHURA
CONVENTIONAL wisdom says it is never too early for children to learn a foreign language. But conventional
wisdom predates the days of paying someone to teach your child another tongue.
"The marketplace has parents totally b,’unboozled," said Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, co-author of"Einstein
Never Used Flashcards: How Our Children Really Learn - and Why They Need to Play More and Memorize
Less" (Rodale Books, 2003) and "~How Babies Talk: The Magic and Mystery of Language in the First Three
Years of Life" (Dutton, 1999). "Being immersed in the language and living within it are what lead to Ianguage
learning, aot 20 minutes of exposure to a Limited set of vocabulary and sentence structures or attendance at a
weekly o11e-hour Spanish class.:’
An increasing mumber of American parents fluent in a foreigl~ language, as well as their English-only
counterparts, want their children to be bilingual if not multilingua!. While no one knows how much is spent in
tolal on games, books, DVDs, online tools a~d foreign-language baby sillers, the amount can easily reach
fl~ousands ofdollaxs a year per toddler. ]’hat counts tutors who charge $70 an hour, classes for $50 a week,
foreiN~ au pairs who can cost $16,000 a year and annual tuition at prE, ale inunersion schooIs that charge
$20,000 for nine months of study.
And this does not include lhe outlay to retain a la~guage as a child ages.
Laurie Dlugos-Schweik of Aurora, I11., plays songs in French and Farsi for her 10-month-old son, Matthew, and
has her mother speak to him in Polish. Ms. Dlugos-Schweik, who says she is proficient in French, studied
Spanish and Latin in school and heard Pofish growing up, plans to enroll Matthew in French class after he turns
2.
"The ttfinking is that by exposing a child at an em’ly age to a different language you create the pathway in the
brain tbr them to learn a futI language ]ater in lit~ at an easier m~d accelerated pace d~an a child without any
exposure," she said. ’~Sinee Matthew is not speaking yet, I have no idea what impact il is having, but I figure it
can’t htlrt."
"[’he most effective way for children to leam another language is lhrough a parent or caregiver, in an immersion
school or even living abroad, say linguists, language teachers and bilingual parents.
Ms. Golinkoffsaid preschool classes in a foreign language every" day might be effective but only if parents
backed that up wi~h books in the language or hired a baby sitter who spoke the language. Poputar once-a-week
classes, she said, do nothin~ more than train the ear - at best.
To really [earn a foreign language, children must spend 30 percent of their waking time exposed to it: said
Christina Bosemark, ~bunder of the Mu[tilingual Children’s Association in San Francisco, which guides parents
rearing nmltilingual children. She said children with less contact might understand a language, but their abili~’
to speak it con’ectty would be hindered. Nonetheless, limited expost~re as babies or toddlers could help if
children study the language later, she said.
2~
Brenda and Joseph Mirsky of New York enrolled their 3-year-old son, Zack, in a 30-v,,eek Spanish-]anguage arls
and crafts class. Mrs. Mirsky said she was unsure how much Zack got from it, but she said she would ha’~’e said
the same thing at that age about he~ daughter, kauren, now 6. From the time she was a baby to 3 years, Lanren
went to weekly Spanish classes. Now, with Spanish and French instruction twice a week at her elementary
school, Lanren sings in Spanish and knows some greetings, numbers ~-md colors, her mofl]er said.
"She’s doing ~eat in Spanish. She loves it," Mrs. Mirsky said. As for French, which Lauren did not study as a
baby, %he doesn’t sw nmch about it,"
Language teachers, linguists mid scientists refer to the so-called critical period, the tender years when children
most easily pick tip languages. Opinions vary, with some experts saying the cutoffends at 2, 3, 5, 7 or 13.
Michael Kandel and Darryl Wong adopted their daughter, Chloe Km~del-Wong, from China in 2002. In 2006,
the couple, who live in Douglaston, Queens, enrolled Chloe irt a $1,000-a-year Maudlin class. With no
knowledge of Chinese herself and none from her pro’cuts, Chloe lasted less than a year.
"We call our daughler the youngest Chinese-schooI dropout," Mr. Kandel said. tte said t_hat he realized the
lessons were not going to be productive because he and his wife were not going to be able to reinforce the
language at home.
Language teachers say outside interaction - play dates in the language, additional classes, hearing pments read
(even if t hey are not Iluent) - is vital, especially if a child’s primary exposure comes in periodic bursts.
"The morn you listen, the more you talk, the more you are exposed to a language, the better it is. II’s like
anything else - tennis, golf, the violin," said Yolanda Borrfis, program director of Musical Kids International in
New York, which teaches music in Spanish, French, Korean and Hebrew. ’% pianist who works one hour a
week won’t be as good as a pianist who works 40 hours a week."
Ms. Borras said that even ifa child did not lmow many foreign words at the end of a program, the ettbrt had not
necessarily been a waste. The?’ should have picked up a language’s cadence and phonetics as well as the concept
that other cullures and languages exist.
.... I’his is a society that wants instant rewards, instant resulls. It’s not realistic to expect a child to speak a
language after 30 hours of instruction over a school year when they spend their first two years of life without
saying a word," Ms. Borr.4s said.
Strict classroom training is wasted on the pre-5-ycar-old set, according to educators who say thai toddlers are
more inclined to chew on a doll’s head than point to ’% t~.te2’ Still, T. Berry Brazelton, the child development
~m.ma and author, said children as young as 3 might be well suited to language class - but only if they want to be
there. Parents, he said, often steer their offspring into what they themselves find interesting rather than what the
child enjoys.
While many mothers, lhthers and grandparents fixate on languages their children do not know, Ms. Oolinkoff
says they should lighten up.
~’It is true that children are best at learning a foreign language before the age of 5," she said. "But it’s not like
you can’t learn a foreign language later."
Susan Behrens, associme professor of eolmnunication sciences and disorders at Marymounl Mmflmttan College,
cautioned against pushing a child into any activity, language or otherwise_
"They say kids are like a sponge and can learn anything, but you can also turn them offeasJly," she said. :’lfyou
26
introduce a language Jn the spirit of play and being embedded in their daily lives, you’re going to he much mote
successfill than if you say, ’O.K., you’re gohag to class now,’ ’"
27
02.02.08 In ~he News
1) Associated Press: Bush education budget is level, seeks boost for reading program
and vouchers (Nancy Zuckerbrod)
2) The New York Times: Bush to Seek Budget Cuts, Except iu Child Health (Robert
Pear)
3) Washin~on Post: Bush Proposes Giving D.C. $32 Million More To Boost School
Reform (David Nakamura)
4)The Associated Press: Bush administration proposes boost in D.C. school funding
6) The New ~rork Times: Appeal of Challenge to ’No Child’ Law (Sam Dillon)
7) Education Week (The School Law Blog): Spellings to Appeal 6th Circuit’s NCLB
Ruling (Mark Walsh)
8) The Associated Press: Spellings in Alabama, announces plan for reading program
increase (Dcsiree Hunter)
9) Montgomery Advertiser= $1B coming for reading program for children (Jenn
Rowell)
10) Birmingham News: U.S. education secretary says President Bush will ask for
full funding for federal reading program; Budget cuts will cost state $11 million
(Marie Leech)
.12} Washington Post: D.C. School Closings List Is Revised (Theola Labb~ and
David aNakamura)
13) Washington Post {Editorial): Narrowing the Gap; Montgomery s~hool programs
are getting the job done.
14) The New York Times: If It’s Tuesday, It Must Be Spanish (Hillary Chura)
Associated Press
Bush education budget is level, seeks boost for reading program and vouchers
WASHINOTON (AP) _. In a year w-hen many federal programs are in line for hefty
budget cuts, President Bush is asking Congress to/argely leave education alone, and
seeking more money for a controversial readhag initiative.
The White House budget proposal being sent to Congress on Monday asks lawtnakers to
sign offon nearly $60 billion tbr education programs, accordin~ to a copy of the
Education Department budget obtained Friday by The Associated Press. The amount
equals what is being spent this year: without an increase to keep pace with inflation.
Among Bush’s proposals for the upcoming budget year: a push for Congress to restoxe
$600 million lawmakers cut from a reading program that serves low-income children.
The progr~m~, called Reading First, recently has received favorable reviews from state
officials and others. But ~t also has been criticized by federal investigators for conflicts of’
interest and mismanagement.
Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said in a telephone interview Friday that there
we~’e problems with the program initially but that they had been addressed and that
reading gains were being made by students served under the initiative.
The administration also is renewing a push for a $300 million proposal that would allow
poor sludents to transfer to better public schools outside their district or to private
schools, if their schools failed to mcc~ benchmarks under ~he 2002 No Child Left Behind
law or had low graduation rates.
Democrats m’e staunchly opposed to using federal dollars for private school vouchers and
have rejected similar administration proposals in the past.
Spellings said it’s unihir to force kids to stay in troubled schools. "’When they are broken
chronically, we have to do something different," she said.
°I’i tie I grants, the main source of federaI funding for poor students, would get $14.3
billitm, about a 3 percent increase from d~Js year, under fl~e administration’s proposal.
About half of the nation’s schools, and lwo-thirds of elementary schools, receive Title 1
funding.
The administration proposes to spend about $11.3 billion for special education sere’ices
for students with disabilities, an increase of roughly $330 million.
A pro~am that helps fund merit-pay plans for teachers who boost student test scores
would double, £rom about $100 millio~ to $200 million. Teachers ~lnions oppose li~aking
paychecks to student scores.
They include programs to encourage arts in schools, bring low-income students on trips
lo Washington, and provide mental health services.
"" Obviously, cuts are difficnlt to make," Spellings said. "" But ! thi~k this is a responsible
budget that sets p,iorities and that is ali~ed with the core mission and the core tbens of
No Child Left Behind."
The Education Department also administers programs that help students and their
families pay for college.
The presidenl is asking Congress to approve an increase of about $2.6 billion tbr the Pe!l
Grant program for low-income eottege students. He is seeking to eliminate other
programs: including the Perkins Loan program, which provides low-interest loans to
needy students.
The New York Times
Februa~’ 2, 2008
By ROBERT PEAR
Michael O. Leavitt, the secretary of health and human services, said Friday that the
president would request $19.7 billion in additional fede]’al allotments to the states for
coverage of children fi’om low-income families in the next five years, Spending on the
pro~am ±i:om 2009 to 2013 would total $45.1 billion.
in an inters’jew, Mr. Lea~,’itt said the president’s budget would allow the program to meet
its "original intent" of covering children with family incomes up to twice the poverly
level, or $42,400 for a ~amily of four. About 18 states cover children Mth family incomes
abo’~’e that level.
The new proposal is midway between the $5 billion increase requested by the president
last year and the $35 billion increase that Congress provided in bills vetoed by Mr. Bush
in October and December.
Bush administration officials were telling Congress as recently as last month that a $5
billion increase would be enough, and many Republicans relied on that assurance. It is
not clear when the White House concluded that $19.7 billion was needed, a question that
lawmakers are sure to pursue in hearings.
In his budget, Mr. Bush sets forth a detailed blueprint for spending $3 tfitlion in the 2009
fiscal year, the largest amount ever requested by a presideni.
Mr. Bush foresees a budget surplus in 2012, but White House officials said the deficit
would be roughly $400 billion a year in 2008 and 2009, far more than the $163 billion
deficit recorded last year.
The budget would increase border security and provide money to protect New Orleans
against devastating storms like Hurricane Katrina.
Michael Chertoff. the secretal)’ of homeland security, aaid the budget would increase
spending on border security and immigration enforcement by 19 percent, to $12.1
billion. The govenunent, he said, planned to hire 2,200 Border Patrol agents to achieve
the goal of 20,000 agents by late 2009.
The administration is requesting $5.8 billion to complete work on levees and flood walls
in file New Orleans area.
But budgel documents show that Ivlr. Bush will also propose deep cuts in a wide range of
domestic progrmns.
Spending on poison control ceuters would be cut 62 percent, to $10 million. Rural health
programs, a favorite of many senators, would be reduced 87 percent, to $16.9 million.
A special health program for rescue workers m~d volunteers M~o responded to the
terrorist atlacks on the World Trade Center in 200I would be cut by 77 percent, to $25
million, even though flae administration has said that many workers were exposed to
"unprecedented levels of risk" for lung disease and o~her illnesses,
Mr. Bush’s budget would end the Community Services Block Grant, a $654 million
program that provides housing, nutrition, education and job services to. low-income
people.
The budget would also end special programs to care for people with AIzheimer’s disease
and to treat people with traumatic brain injury. Mr. Bush would eliminate federal money
for a new ’~patient navigatoa-" program, which coordinates care far people wi~h cancer and
other serious illnesses. The administration contends that these programs are ineffective or
duplicate other govermnent initiatives.
Mr. Bush proposes a 22 percent eu~ in the Low-lncolne Home Energy Assistance
Pro~am, which provides $2.6 billion to help people pay heating bills. Many lawmakers
want to expand lhe program at a time when oil costs are soaring.
For fl~e National Institutes of Health, the president is requesting $29.5 billion in 2009,
the same anaount it received this year.
The budget responds to a bipartisan clamor for new safeguards to ensua’e the safety of
food and dn~gs.
Mr. B~sh is requesting .82.4 billion for the Food and Drttg Administration, up 5.7
percent ti’om the current level. Secretary Lea’~itt said some of the money would be used
to hia’e and deploy F.D.A. persom~el in foreign cotu~tries, so they could inspect tbod..
drugs and medical devices destined for the United States.
Mr. Bush wants to end the Hope VI housing pro~am, which upgrades severely
dilapidated public housing. The House ~’oted two weeks ago to renew the program lbr
eight years.
Representative Spencer Bachus of Alabama, one of 53 Republicans who ~,,oted for the
bill, said: ’~The program has been a snceess, It has eliminated some of the most dangerous
and distressed punic housing in the country, and created livable, mixed-income
communilies."
The White House wants to eliminate spending for more than a dozen education pro~ams,
including Event Start, which promotes fmnily literacy;, grm~s to the states for classroom
technology; Supplemental Education Opportunity Grants, for needy undergraduates; and
a scholarship program named for the chNrman of the Senate Appropriations Committee,
Robert C. BYrd, Democrat of West Virginia,
But Margaret Spellings, the secrelary of education, said Friday that the president would
requesl $1 billion for the Reading First program, to teach poor.children to read by the
third grade. Congress cut the program !o $393 million this yem" after federal investigators
found conflicts of interest, cronyism and bias in the awarding of grants.
Ms. Spellings said she hoped lawmakers would "see flae en’or &their ways."
Bush Proposes Giving D.C. $32 Million More To Boost School Reform
The ~’~ite House plans to atmounce Mondw flint it has proposed giving the District $32
million in additional federal funding this year for public education, inc.luding a special
$20 million payment aimed at helping Mayor Adrian M. Fentv restructure public schools,
federal officials said.
The recommendation, contained in the White House’s overall proposed D.C. budget,
directs the funds toward a series of enhancements for the nemrly 50,000-student public
system and the 20,000-stnden! public charter school p~’o~am.
Among the proposals lbr the traditional schools is an incentive-pay program designed to
reward teachers whose students meet specific performance goaIs, D.C. Schools
Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee said. About $5 miBion would go toward replicating
successful charter schools, and $7 million would go toward beefing up programs in low-
performing schools.
"The package includes an infusion of resources to jump-start the mayor’s robust refom~
strategy for D.C. Public schools," U.S. Edttcation Secretary Margaret Sp_el!!ngs said in a
statement.
"These targeted investraents are a critical catalyst tbr the types of im~ovalion that have
been lacking for too long in the Nation’s Capital," Fenty (D) said in a letter to Congress
supporting the White ttouse’s D.C. budget request. "These initiatives will spur improved
instruction and services, directly benefiting students in the classroom."
Typically, the school system thnnels $120 million a year in federal funds 1o its schools.
In 2006, the U.S, Depm’tment of Education declared that the school system was a "high
risk" for mismanaging federal funds.
District officials called the proposed influ:~ ofne~v money a breakthrough and said it
shows the federal government has confidence in the Fenty administration’s school reform
plans. The bridget requires approval from Congress.
Since Fenty downgraded dae Board of Education and took control of the school system in
June, he has been working on a number of changes. Yeslerday, Fenty and Rhee
armounced a rex,[seal list of 23 school.g that will be closed, including 16 this lhlL
Rhee’s office is working to increase the public schools’ fiscal 2009 budget by about $17
million in local[ fimds, to a total of $794,6 million in local moncy.
Under the proposed federal education budget, the city would get $18 million in each of
three categories: for public schools, for charters and for the D.C. Opporttmity Scholarship
program. Each of tl~ose received between $13 million and $14 million last year.
.am additional :t;20 million would come to the District in a one-time payment to support
the Fenty administration’s retbrm eflbrts. That money will be earmarked to help support
and train teachers a~)d principals, develop nov,, programs for low-perYorming schools,
improve data reporting tbr student accotmtability aid help start the teacheT incentive-pay
program.
The District schools have not had an incentive-pay program, Rhee said, but she is in fl~e
process of developing one, in conjunction with the Washington "reachers’ Union. She
declined to talk about specifics but said support from the White House shows that federal
officials Ihink she is serious about improving performance.
"When I say performance pay, I will not water it down and create ridiculous incentives
that don’t move student achievement," Rhee said. "I do ~ot thi~k it’s normal for the
federal government to give this mnount to a school district, but my track record ofd0ing
different things made them believe I could do this."
The Associated Press
2008-02-02 04:37:11.0
WASHINGTON (AP) - The White House plans to announce a proposal to direct $32
million in additional federal funding to the D.C. public education system.
The ftmding includes a one-time $20 million payment to support Mayor Adrian Fenty’s
school reform effort. The funding would help start an incentive-pay program designed
to reward teachers whose students meet perfom~anee goals and would fund training for
teachers and principals. The money ’also would target new programs at low-performing
schools.
In a statement, U.S. Education Secretary Margaret Spellings says the money will jump-
start the mayor’s school reform strategy.
LANSING, Mich. (AP) _ The U.S. Department of Education said Friday it will ask a
federal appeals court to reconsider a ruling in a Iawsuit related to No Child Let~ Behind
Act lhnding.
School districts in lhree states including Michigan and the nation’s largest teachers’ union
have sued the federal goverrmaent, arguing Sat schools should not have to comply w~th
requirements of the education law that aren’t funded by the federal gove~awnent.
On Jan, 7: a lhree-judge pm~el of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati
sided with lhe plaintiffs by a 2-1 decision.
The appeals court majority said No Child Left Behind fails to provide clear notice as to
who bears the addi.tional costs of compliance. The court majority said statutes enacted
under the spending clause of the U.S. Constitution must provide clear notice to the states
of their liabilities if they accept federal funding tmde~ those statutes.
The U.S. Department of Education is asking all active judges on 6th Circuit Court of
Appeals to rehear the ease.
"’We think we have a ~’e~’ slrong case," Educatiou Secretary Margaret Spellings said
Friday. "’We don’t believe No Child Left Behind is an tmfunded mandate?’
Spellings said that if the appeals court decision were to stand, it could undermine efforts
to improve education.
Plaintiffs include the Pontiac, Mich., school district and eight districts in Texas and
Vermont, along with Nation’~ Education Association affiliates in several states.
They claim federal funding is not keeping pace with additional mandates required by No
Child Left Be]find, requiring schools to pay f~orn local and state sources to keep
A message seeking comment was left with the National Education Association on Friday
afternoon.
The New York Times
February 2, 2008
By SAM DILLON
One month after a three-judge p~mel of a federal appeals court revived a legal challenge
to the federal No Child Left Behind law, Educatian Secretary Margaret Spellings said she
would ask the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in Cincinnati, to
convene a larger panel to reconsider that ruling. In its 2-to-I ruling on Jan. 7, the Sixth
Circuit said that school districts in Michigan and several other states had been j~stiiied in
their 2005 suit lhat argued the law required them to pay for testing and other programs
without providing sufficient federal money.
Education Week
By Mark Walsh
U.S. Secretary" of Education Margaret Spellings announced today that the Bush
administration will appeal a court ruling that revived a lawsuit which contends the No
Child Left Behind Act is an unfunded federal mandate.
Spellings said that U.S. Solicitor General Paul D. Clement, who is the top appellate
lav,2-er in the Deparlment of Justice, has authorized an appeal asking that the full U.S.
Court of Appeals tbr the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati, rehear the case of Pontiac School
District v. &’petlings,
A panel of the 6th Circuit court ruled 2-1 on Jan. 7 that the states were not on clear
notice of their potential financial obligations when they agreed to aeeep~ federal
fimding under the No Child Lct~ B~hind taw. Th~ majority ruled ~hat stm~ and local
oEq cials could "~easunably read" the law’ s unfunded-mandam provision to conclude
the federal govermnent would pay for all costs associated with complying with the
law.
t wrote about the ruling in Education tgeekSe__e~re and my colleague David Hoffand 1[
wrote here about a letter Spellings ~a-ote to chief state school officers that was critical
of the ruling.
In her statement today, Spellings said the administration’s appeal to the full 6th Circuit
"will be filed shorlly."
"As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I strongly disagree with the ruling, and believe that
if the decision were to stand, it could undermine efforts to improve the education of
our nation’s children, in patlicular those students most in need," .Spellings said in Ihe
statement. "NCI,B is not an unfunded mandate. ]t is a volumary compact between the
states and the federal government, which asks that in exchange [br federal tax dollars,
results be demonstrated. This inveslment is netting solid results and creating an
opportunity for eyeD’ child in America to have access to a quality education."
The School Law Btog covers news and analysis on legal developments qffecting schools,
educators, and parents. Mark ~Valsh has been covering legal issues in education for"
more than 15 yeasts for Education Week H~ ~ritg.v about school-related cases in the U.S.
~qupreme Court and in lower cvurl~.
The Associated Press
By Desiree Hunter
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) -- Educators, legislators and state officials met with UoS.
Education Secretm7 Mar~aret Spellings Friday for a round-table discussion about No
Child Left Behind that was at turns critical mad complimentary, but always candid.
"I thought it was stimulating conversation, I think it was straight t’~om the heart and from
professional people who are in education every day," state S uperintendent of Education
Joe Morton said after the Montgomery meeting.
"I thilN it gives (Spellings) some concrete, hands-on things that can be done to improve
the Iaw -- not theory or philosophical things -- but productive and constructive (input),"
he said.
Spellings’ visit was one of several stops she is making throughout the country to discuss
the successes and shortcomings of the federal act that was passed in 2002 and has been
unpopular with many public school teachers.
She said there have been a tot ofcormnon threads in her conversations wi~h educators
around the country, wkh some of the key issues involving the way students are ~racked,
supplemental sen, ices that are offered and chm~ging what now amounts to a pass!lhil
system tbr schools.
But despite all the improvements that need to be made, Spellings said, the law has
produced some positive resulls.
"There’s a focus on ever)., !rid and every’ group of students so we’re no lounger content
with: ’Average everybody’s achievement together and say ’Hooray for us’," she said. "We
are going to look at every kid ~ every group of Hispanic kids, African-]unerican kids,
special ed kids, and we’re going to hold them all to a high standard and that’s proficiency
by 2014."
RhondaNeal Waltman: who was the assistant superintendent of Mobile schools when the
law went i~ato effect, said the positives outweigh ~he bad.
"I do think it was a catalyst for change for us," said Wa!tman, who attended the round-
~able and shared about her experiences. "A disadvantage of it is we had focused a lot on
testing before we realized if we focus on rigorous curriculum the tests will take care of
themselves.
"Do we need to tweak it? Absolutely. Does it need more funding? Absolutely. But don’t
throw it away," she said.
Spellings also announced President Bush’s plans to ask Congress ~o raise fimding tbr the
nationwide Reading First program to at least $1 billion when he makes kis budget request
for fiscal year 2009 on Monday.
The program serves low-income children and saw its budget slashed by 60 percent to
$393 million in the ct~cnt ~~scaI year. An Education Department inspector general’s
report last year showed mismanagement and conflicls of interest in the program in its
early years.
Chad Colby, a spokesmml for Spellings, said the secretary has accepted and implemented
the inspector general’s recommendations and the problems have been fixed.
"Our position has alwa~s been: Don’t tl~a’ow the baby out with the bath water," Colby
said. "You’ve got an effective program that is helping. You shouldn’t throw away a
federal program because of early mm~agement problems with implementation."
Morton aoo’eed, saying the federal cuts to the program -- which amotmt to about $10
million for Alabama -- would be especially dire now with millions in state cuts looming.
"People are devastated, truly devastated with the cut. You could hear it in their voices
loday," he said. "I’m hopeful that it’s a one year cut I....hope it’s rectified when they
adopt the next budget."
Montgomery Advertiser
U.S. Secretary, of Educalion Margaret Spellings told listeners at Alabama’s State House
that President Bush will include $1 billion in the federal budget for the Reading First
program when he introduces his budget Monday.
She also conceded that the No Child Left Behind law mioO~t work better if it paid
attention to how far behind the schools actually were.
The Reading First program, which serves low-income children, had its budget slashed by
60 percent to $393 million during the current fiscal year, which amounted to about a $10
million cut for AIabama,
Gov. Bob Riley, Alabama lav~rnakers and other educators at the Friday roundtable
meeting said the increase in funds would be important to the state.
Joseph Morton, state superintendent of education~ said the devastating effect the cut had
on the state could be even more devastating if ftmds weren’t restored for the upcoming
fiscal year because of the budget problems the Alabama Legislature thces.
Most agreed that the No Child Left Behind law would be more effective if it didn’t .just
reward schools on a pass/fail basis.
Currently, schools either meet standards or they don’t. NCLB rewards the ones who do.
But there is no differentiation made among those that don’t -- even schools cttronically
below standards that make significant progress.
"Is it problem free? Absolutely not," Spel]ings said of the program. "We are pleased, bm
not satisfied."
Spellings said because NCLB does not track progress, it hurts some states such as
Alabama that have sonde schools that may not meet standards yet, but have come a long
way toward reaching tl~em.
The most recent National Assessment of Educational Programs, or NAEP, found that
Alabama’s fourth-graders had their highest gains ever in math and reading, and eighth-
graders achieved their highest scores in math since the assessment was established about
30 years ago.
Alabmna is also one of nine states to reduce the math achievement gap between white
and Hisp:mic students in grades 3 through 8 and high school.
The intense tbcus on elementary students is getting the intended results, the educators
said, but more progres.~ needs to be made.
In the last five years, fourth-graders have shovm incre~ed achievement in reading and
mafia, but eighth-~aders haven’t shown the same progress. Irt both cases, Alabama
students performed below the national averages.
Spellings and Ton~-ny Ledbetter, principal of Buckhorn High School in Madison County,
said NCLB needs to pay" more attention to middle and high school students and that the
drop-out tale is one of the issues that needs to be addressed.
Supplemental services, which Spellings said is "Washington speak for tutoring," also
need to become a priority.
Morton said tutoring should be the first option for students, ~tbllowed by school choice.
"We want alter-school tutoring to extend the sehooI day artd extend learning," Hagood
said.
Getting the best teachers into the most challenging school settings, instead of sending
new- and inexperienced teachers into those situations, is also a key topic for Spellings.
One area of agreement was that schools and students should be rewarded ft~r their
success.
"It’s better than (a) revival," Riley said of award ceremonies a! schools.
Birmingham News
U.S. education secretary- says President Bush will ask for full funding for federal
reading program
The federal Reading Fizst program will take a 60 percem funding cut this year, meaning
Alabama will get just $7 million lbr the Alabama Reading First Initiative in the fall,
instead of the $18 million i, gets now.
"The hugely bad news is ARFI, but the good news is lhat Congress is increasing Title I
fitnds, so let’s bring these two togmher to continue Reading First," Spellings said at a
roundtable discussion with Gov. Bob Riley, sta~e school Superintendent Joe Morton
and several educators and legislators.
The federal reading program is for students in grades kindergarten through three and is
targeted at schools with high poverty tevels. Such schools also receive federal Title i
money, which is based on the number of students on the free and reduced-price lm~ch
program.
The Alabama Reading Initiative, which is different from the federal Reading First
Initiative, has been in elementary schools since 1997. Federal educators used
Alabama’s successful reading program as a model for lhe federal program~ which began
in 2002.
While the Alabama Reading Initiative is in all elementary schools, the federal pwgram
serves 95 schools in 46 school systems throughout the state.
Riley said he will not support funding culs for the state’s initiative.
"The budget I’m sending not only says not to cut funding for reading~ but to increase
it," he said.
Spellings noted that the reading initiatives combined have helped raise reading test
scores. Alabama posled the highest gains in fourth-grade reading last year on ll~e
National Assessment of Educational Progress, also known as the nation’s report card.
"When we looked at the NAEP scores, we thought, "This has to be a mi~ake,’" she
said. "Your reading scores stand out in the nation."
Morton said despite the fimding cuts this year, A!abama is on the right track.
"We aren’t where we w~mt to be, but we are making great progress," he said. "Alabama
is never going back. It’s only upward from here."
Spellings also discussed the No Child Left Behind legislation, which was up
reauthorization last year but wasn’t reauthorized. She said the act needs to be tweaked,
and she hopes it comes up for reauthorization this year.
Child Left Behind is here *o stay. It does not expire," Spellings said. "But it’s not
probIem-frec."
Rep. Mac Gibson, R-Prattville, said he thinks Congress should offer states more money
for No Child Left Behind requirements.
"I think "the reds could have helped a little more finm~cialty ibr what they warn us to
do," he said.
Morton said he thinks Alabama is better off for having the law. Before, the state
averaged test sco~es based on all studenls. The law requires states to break students into
subgroups based on race, income leve! and special education.
The new data allow educators to see how well every student performs and what groups
of students need improvement.
Spellings told state officials Friday that Alabama is one of just nine states ~o reduce the
performance gap between v,’hite and Hispanic students, to which the room broke out in
applause.
WSFA NBC-TV - Hontgomery~ Ala,
He says he’ll ask for more funding -- not a cut -- For the program.
Washington Post
]By Theala Labb~ and David Nakamura, Washington Pose Staff Writers
D.C. Mayor Adrian M. FenW and Schools Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee gave a reprieve
yesterday to six schools originally targeted in their school closing plan but added four
new ones to the list.
Added are Benning Elementary and Merrill Middle in Northeast, both o:t’whM~ would
close in Jtme, and Garnet-Patterson Middle and Park View Elementary’ in Northwest,
which would ctose by 2011 or later, the mayor said.
The schools no longer on the list are Bruce-Monroe Elementary in Northwest mad John
Burroughs and Smothers elementaries in No~xheast; Ronald H. Brown Middle and
Brovme Middle, both in Northeast, and Shaw Middle in Northwesl.
Fenty and Rhee said the revised plans were the result of hours of public cormnents from
nine meetings and 23 public hearings since November. During those sessions, they were
commended tbr seeking to pare down excess space in the 49,600-student school system,
and they v-ere the object of protests from parents who said the administration had
overlooked safety issues and failed to consider t.he strength of academic progrmns.
The revised list ~’etqects public feedback on the proposal bul ’also is the result of Rhee’s
reexamination of the plan, said spokeswoman Mafara Hobson.
Fenty and Rhee did not give detailed reasons lbr adding or subtracting a school from the
list. City education leaders previously have said that student enrollment and population
trends were factors in the decision.
Unlike preceding school leaders, who proposed staggering closures over the next decade,
Fenty and Rhee are sticking to their plmas to shul 23 schools within a few years. Sixteen
schools would close in June and seven closings would be spread over the next few years,
Fenly said yesterday. More than 5,300 students attend the closing schools.
Officials have not announced what will happen to lhe schools, but Fenty said: "We will
keep all the schooIs within the inventory of the D.C. government. We don’t intend to sell
any of them."
The revised plan drew flesh ire from parents with children at schools added to the li~t.
Yveue Moore, 4t, who graduated li’om Merrill, as did her two older children, said she
was considering set, cling her third child there but found it "amazing" to see the school on
the 1o-be-closed list. She said it seems the school is being judged because of a few poorly
performing sludenls.
"I know a couple of kids are having some issues, but I’m still puzzled. It seems like mosl
kids are doing okay," she said.
She said she does not like the idea of sending her son to Ronald H. Brown Middle
School, the designated transfer school,, which she said is irt a dangerous neighborhood
and is too !:at away ±br her son to walk there.
"With all the violence I’ve heard and seen on the news in that area -- Merritt wasn’t
having that type of violence," she said.
In an inte~’iew, Rhee said the revisions were more the result of individual arguments she
heard in private meetings with parents and others than large community gatherings and
demonstrations.
"None of the changes were driven by people coming out to big meetings," Rhee said.
"The way that was more productive was when small groups came to me and said, ’Here
are otlr concerns, here are our. ideas.’ "
For example, after D.C. Council member Jack Evans (D-Ward 2) and neighborhood
leaders said Shaw’s large campus could be a community resource, Rhee reversed course
a~ad proposed closing Garnet-Patterson instead of Shaw. Shaw’s large athletic IMds, she
said, could attxact students looking for activities and cut do’~’~n on truancy.
But Florence IIarrnon; ,~m advisoD’ neighborlmod corrm~issioner in the West End/Foggy
Bottom neighborhood: where Stevens Elementary is located, said her arguments against
closing the school went unheeded when she ,ne~ with Rhee. Harmon said she cited its
academic programs and historical importance to the co~mmmity as the first school for
freed slaves.
"They made the decision completely on enrollment They didn’t take into account the
quality of the educational programs, because if they did, Stevens would still be open,"
Harmoa said.
"I-he new proposal calls for Bem~ing students to move to Smothers Elementary in
Northeast, while students from Merritt would go to Ronald H. Brown in Northeast. In
Northwest, students from Garnet-Patterson would attend Shaw, m~d Park View students
would attend Bruce-Monroe. All four receiving schools had been on the closing list
proposed in Novembey but were taken off under the new plan.
A public hearing on the proposal is set for 6 p.m. Feb. 27 at McKinley Technology High
School in Northeasl.
Council members, who criticized Fenty and Rhee for not consulting with them b¢tbre
releasing their original proposal, were personally briefed by Rhee and Fenty on Thursday.
"Obviously it was difficult from the beginning because of a lack ol’communication, but
the process got better as we went along," said Chairman Vincent C. Gray (D). "This
sends a message that [the administration was] flexible."
Although council member Jim Graham (D-Ward I ) said he was glad that Bruce-Monroe
and Shaw in his district were spared, he said he would fight for Park View m~d Garnet-
Patterson. "The squeaky wheel, the schools told that they were going to close, were
obviousIy very convincing," he said. "We’re going to make our case."
Park View is an anchor of the neighborhood, he said, and Garnet-Patterson was the first
African American junior high school in the city.
Council member Harry Thomas Jr. (D-Ward 5) said he still ,,’,’ants Rhee to take Bunker
Hill Elementary and Backus Middle of the list and also M.M. Washington because it is
the city’s only vocational high .school.
Thomas, who has pushed for more inclusion in the process~ said he felt more "optimistic"
about being heard by Rhee and Fenly.
"They kept us in the loop a lot better than they did before," he said.
Thomas said that will not deter him from going fota,~,ard with legislation that would
require more input from the public on school closures and council oversight of the
disposal ofschoo! property.
Staff writers Michelle Boorstein, Nikita Stewart and Debbi Wilgoren contributed to this
report.
Washington Pos~
Editorial
WHEN JERRY D. Weast took the helm of Montgomery County public schools, he issued
a harsh wake-up call. The top-notch school system was overlooking children of color and
those from low-income families; the resulting gap in achievement between underserved
students and white, better-off students was intolerable. Mr. Weast’s progress in narrowing
the gap is dear-cut and should serve as a template for action among schools struggling to
improve student achievement.
The latest validation of the strategy M,. Weast pursued these past nine years comes in a
recent report from the County Council’s office of oversight. Not only did the system
make substantial progress in closing the achievement gap, it did so while raising
performance overall. Every group of students, including African Americans, English-
language learners and special education students, posted gains on statewide reading and
math tests given in third, fifth and eighth grades. That meant, for example, an increase in
reading proficiency from 48 percent to 73 percent for black flair&graders and an increase
from 40 percent to 75 percent for Hispanics. Some of the most dramatic gains occurred in
fine early grades, such as the spurt in black kindergartners who are abIe to read at grade
level to an impressive 90 percent in 2007.
The improvement in the early grades is not a coincidence, given that d~ese are the
students who have benefited most from such seh0ol retbrms as all-day kindergarten and
smaller class sizes. the students referred to as "Jerry’s kids," who were in kindergarten
when the programs were launched, are nov,, in the seventh grade, and it well be interesting
to see how they fare in the troublesome middle-school years.
To be sure. the achievement gap hasn’t been eliminated~ and critical issues still face the
t 37,000-student system. There are areas where, as the report notes, results have been
mixed and a few where the system has lost ground. It’s worrisome, for instance, that more
minority students are being suspended, are dropping out, or are being identified as
needing special education. School officials say they are aware of these shortcomings and
are working on remedies.
The unusual council review irked some school officials, who saw it as redundant, given
the system’s own analyses, and even as an intrusion on the authority of the elected school
board. Certainly, the council shouldn’t overstep its limits, but it has a right to assess the
success of programs it funds. Indeed, ~hat such a positive picture emerges from a tough
outside review should only help in securing the resources to complete Mr. Weast’s ct’dt to
action.
The New York Times
February. 2, 2008
YOUR MONEY
By HILLARY CHURA
CONVENTIONAL ~4sdom says it is never too early for children to learn a foreign
language. But conventional wisdom predates the days ofpwing someone to teach your
child another tongue.
"The marketplace has parents totally bmnboozled," said Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, co-
author of "Einstein Never Used Flashcards: How Our Children Really Lem~ -- mid Why
They Need to Play More and Memorize Less" (Rodale Books, 2003) and "How Babies
Talk: The lVlagic and Mystery- of Language in the First Three Years of Life" (Dutton,
1999). "Being irmnersed in the language and riving within it are what lead to language
learning, not 20 minutes of exposure to a limited set of vocabulary and sentence
structnres or attendance at a weekly one-hour Spanish class."
And this does not include the outlay to retain a language as a child ages.
Laurie Dlugos-Schweik of Aurora, I11., plays songs in French mad Farsi for her 10:month-
old son, Matthew, and has her mother speak to him in Polish. Ms. Dlugos-Schweik, who
says she is proficient in French, studied Spanish and Latin in school and heard Polish
growing up, plans to enrol! Matthew in French class after he turns 2.
"The thinking is that by exposing a child at an early age to a different language you
create the pathway in ~e brain t})r them to learn a full language later in life at an easier
and accelerated pace allan a child without any expos~are," she said. "Since Matthew is not
speaking yet, I have no idea what impact it is having, but I figure it can’t hurt."
The most effective way for children to learn another language is through a parent or
caregiver, in an imrnersion school or even IMng abroad, say linguists, language teachers
and bilingual parents.
Ms. Oolinkoff said preschool classes in a foreign langnage ever3’ day might be effective
but only if parents backed thai up with books in the language or hired a baby sitter who
spoke the language. Popular once-a-week classes, she said, do nothing more than train the
ear -- at best.
To really learn a foreign language, children retest spend 30 percent of their waking time
exposed to it, said Christina Bosemark, founder of the Multillt~gual Children’s
Association in San Francisco, which guides parents rearing multilingual chil&en. She
said ehildre~ with less contact migl~t understand a language, but tl~eir ability to speak it
correctly would be hindered. Nonetheless, limited exposure as Sables or toddlers could
help if children study the language later, she aaid.
Brenda and Josepla Mirsky of New York ertrolled their 3-year-old son, Zack, in a 30-
week Spanish-language arts and crafts class. Mrs. Mirsky said she was unsure how much
Zack gel from it, but she said she would have said the same thing at that age about her
daughter, Lauren, nm,~- 6. From the time she was a baby to 3 years, Lauren went to
weekly Spanish classes. Now, with Spanish and French iristruction twice a week at her
elementary school, Lauren sings in Spm~ish and knows some greetings, numbers and
colors, her mother said.
"She’s doing great in Spanish. She loves it," Mrs. Mirsky said. As ti)r French, which
Lauren did not study as a baby, "she doesn’t say much about it."
Language teachers, linguists and scientists refer to the so-called critical period, the te~der
years when children most easily pick up languages. Opinions vary, with some experts
saying the cutoffends at 2, 3, 5, 7 or 13.
Michael Kandei and Darryl Wong adopted their daughter, Chloe Kandel-Wong, from
China in 2002. In 2006, the couple, who live in Douglaston, Queens, enrolled Chloe in a
$1,000-a-year Mandarin class. With no knowledge of Chinese herself and none fi’om her
parents: Chloe lasted less than a year.
’;We call our daughter the youngest Chinese-school dropout," Mr. Kandel said. He said
that he realized the lessons were not going to be productive because he and his wife were
not going to be able to ~einforce the language at home.
Language teachers say outside interaction -- play dates in the language, additionN
classes, hearing parents read (even if they are not fluent) -- is s, ital, especially if a child’s
primau exposure comes in periodic bursts.
"’The more you listen, the more you talk, the more you are exposed to a language; the
better it is. It’s like anything else ~ tennis, golf, the violin," said Yolanda Borrfis,
program director of Musical Kids International in New York, which teaches music in
Spanish, French, Korean and llcbrew. "A pianist who works one hour a week won’t be as
good as a pianist who works 40 hours a week."
Ms. Borrfis said that even ifa child did not know m~y foreign words at the end of a
progrmn, the effort had not necessarily been a waste. They should have picked up a
language’s cadence and phonetics as well as the concept that other cultures and languages
exist.
"This is a society that wants instant rewards, instant results. It’s not realistic to expect a
child to speak a language after .30 hours ofins~-uction over a school year when they
spend their first two years of life without saying a word," Ms. Borrfis said.
Strict classroom training is wasted on the pre-5-year-old set, according to educators who
say that toddlers are more inclined to chew on a doll’s head than point m "la tare." Still,
T. Bert7 Brazelton, the child development guru and author, said chil&en as young as 3
might be well suited to language class -- but only if they want to be tl~ere. Parents, lie
said, often steer their offspring into what they themselves find interesting raffler than
what the child enjoys.
Wtfile many mothers, fathers and grandparents fixate on languages thei~ children do not
know, Ms. Golinkoff says they should lighten
"It is true that children are best at learning a foreign language before the age of 5," she
said. ~’But it’s not like you can’t learn a foreign language later."
"They say kids are like a sponge and can learn anything, but you can also turn them off
easily," she said. "lf you introduce a language in the spirit of play and being embedded in
their daily li~,es, you’re going to be much more successful than if you say, ’O.K., you’re
going to class now.’ ’"
Private- Spellings, Margaret
From; McLane, Katherine
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 201:)7 8:35 AM
To: Pdvate - Spellings, Margaret; Beaton, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Colby, Chad; Dunn, David;
Evers, Bill; Flowers, Sarah; Hataska, Terrell; Johnson, Henry; Kuzmich, Holly; Lenders,
Angola; Maddox, Lauren; Mcnitt, Townsend L.; Mesecar, Doug; Pitts, Elizabeth; TUcker, Sara
Martinez; Scheessele, Marc; Simon, Ray; Tada, Wendy; Talbert, Kent; Toomey, Liam; Tracy
Young; Williams, Cynthia; Young, Tracy
Quesinberry, Elaine; Farris, Amanda; Conaty, Joseph; ’scott_m._stanzel@who.eop.gov’; Ditto,
Trey; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; Ruberg, Casey; Terreli, Julie; Yudof, Samara
Subject: Oversight Is Set For Beleaguered U.S. Reading Program (NYT)
In a letter of response, Deputy Secretary Ray Simon said ED agrees that, "at the RLAs, Depadment officials could have
and should have done more to clarify l:hat the Department was not promoting or endorsing specific reading programs, maledafs,
assessment instruments or models of instruction." But Simon added that the department doesn’t agree [ully with IG’s findings
because it neglected to consider the conferences’ positive impacl on lhe program.
IG again slaps ED for wrongdoing in Reading First program (Education Daily)
By Kris Kitto
Education Daily, February 26, 2007
The Education Department unlawfully promoted specific reading curricula and a reading assessment test when laying the
groundwork for the $I billioma*year Reading First Program, according to an Office of Inspector General audit released late last
week.
Auditors combed through comments from Reading First conference participants and e-mails from ED personnel to
determine thai the department showed favoritism toward certain reading programs, such as Direct Instruction and Open Court,
from the time the national program launched in 2002.
¯ The audit focuses on the department’s Reading Leadership Academies, three conferences held shortly afler the program
was authorized through the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act. The academies were intended to help state administrators
implement programs founded on scientifically based reading research, but several portions of the conferences seemed like
targeted prDmotions to many attendees.
’1 felt like it was simply a push for a national curriculum," reads one attendee comment ciled by the audit. "1 think I’!1 go buy
shares in Open Court!" The audit is the fifth in a six-pa~t IG series thai: has embroiled a program otherwise heralded as a
substanLial effort to make strides in literacy among at-risk children.
It also found that ED seemed to encourage use of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Eady Literacy Skills Assessment Test in
conference materials.
Bob Slavin, chairman of the reading-based school reform model Success For All and one of the original complainants to IG,
said the audit confirmed what many people in the industry already knew.
Any vindication Slavin may reef, 1hough, is outweighed by the time lag that now prevents the possibility of a just solution,
he said.
"What’s discouraging about this.., is thal at the lime when these issues were first brought up, it was possible to have done
something,’ Slavin said, explaining he had repealed meetings with ED officials to express his concerns. Those meetings fell on
deaf ears; he said, forcing him to take his complaint to fG in June 2005.
The program’s money has now been allocated, he said, making it difficult to correct ED’s influence on Reading First
curricula,
In a letter of response, Deputy Secrelary Ray Simon said ED agrees that, "at the RLAs, Departmenl officials could have
and should have done more lo clarify that the D~padment was not promoling or endorsing specific reading programs, malerials,
assessment instruments or models of inslcruction."
Bul Simon added that lhe depadment doesn’t agree fully with IG’s findings because it neglected to consider the
conferences’ positive impacl on the program.
The audit also examined the Reading Firsl Web site and an April 2002 guidance book, finding that both were in compliance
with the law.
_.p__.rivate -~Spel!in~s, Margaret_..
From: katherine mclane ,, _ .............
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:41 AM
To: Oldham, Cheryl; Conklin, Kristin; Schray, Vickie; Dunckel, Denise; Shaw, Terd; Sampson,
Vincent; Quarles, Karen; Bannerman, Kristin; scott m. stanzel@who.eop.gov; jeanie_s.
_mamo@who.eop.gov; Manning, James; Beaten, Meredith; Briggs, Kerri; Ruberg, Casey;
Colby, Chad; Williams, Cynthia; Dunn, David; Dorfman, Cynthia; Evers, Bill; Kuzmich, Holly;
La Force, Hudson; Landers, Angela; MacGuidwin, Katie; Maddox, tauten; Private- Spellings,
Margaret; McGrath, John; Mesecar, Doug; Neale, Rebecca; Reich, Heidi; rob Saliterman;
Yudof, Samara; Scheessele, Marc; Hataska, Terrell; loner, Jana; Menitt, Townsend L;
Young, Tracy; Ditto, Trey; Tucker, Sara Martinez; Zeff, Ken
Subject: Spellings Faces Student Loan Questions (AP)
"Not only are we not asleep at the switch, but we are very much aL the helm and managing
o~r business,"
Spellin~s said in ~n Associated Press interview Wednesday, a day before she was to testify
before a House cc.mn~J.ttee.
Spellings was referring to a recent comment by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who
said the department was "asleep at the switch" when it came to overseeing the student loan
industry.
Cuomo has led an investigation into the $85 billion industry that has turned up evidence
that some colleges reoeived a percentage of loan proceeds from lenders given preferred
status by the schools e practice Cuomo ualls "kickbacks." Cuomo mlso said some college
loan officers received--gifts from ]ende]-s to encourage them to steer borrowers their way.
On Wednesday, the House overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan bill that would ban gifts from
lenders to schools and impose strict controls on schools that pub].ish approved lender
lists to guide students to certain ]can companies.
Spellings said she has asked an Education Department task force to come up wirh
recommendations for new regulations to better protect, against conflicts of inzerest
between schools or school offJda!s and lenders.
The proposed regulazions wil! include a requirement of at leas~ thr~e lenders on any
school’s preferred-lender list, together with an explanation of how and why they were
chosen. The rules also will spell out what is allowed and what is p~hibited with regard
to inducemen=s from lenders to schools, Spellings said.
In addition :o facing questioning about the student loan ir~dustry, Spellings is expected
to be asked b’i lawmakers ~hursda.v about a No Child Left Behind reading program, Reading
First, that has been criticized for conflicts c.[ .~nt.ere..~ and mismanagement.
Now tha:’s room se~:~f&&7. ..... t2;~;~~e ~r;:,&-~-.}cr 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations cn Yahoo!
Trave! :o find your fit.
htttp:/ifarechase, yahoo, com/promo-gener~.c-] 47[~5097