~ \\1' It

~ Harvey.ReldCllepamall.epa.gov
~." 101291200108:58:31 AM

Record Type: Record

To: PM CooneylCEOJEOP
ceo
SUbjeC1: Re: Projectlons chaplet ot {he naUOna' communicatfon

Phil:

A quick clarifying question 011 your note: You said you supported Option
2, which involves using the Markal Macro model and completing the
analysis early next year. However, your note said you wanled a complete
document by December and thallhe projections chepler WO\Jld be pnovided
only a few weeks later than Nov. 15, which is inconsistent with the
schedule lor option 2. Did you mean to say you prelerred option 1 (the
AEO numbers) or option 2 (the Marl<al option)?

Also. I'd like to send the draft. Fed. Reg. noUee that I sent you last
week out to ll1e interagency group by COB tomolTOW. 111 assume you
have no edits W, don' hear from you by then.

Best regards,
ReiCl

Reid Harvey
. Team Leader, Market Policy Brandl
Clean PJT Marl<als Division (Iormerly the Acid Rain Division)
Off",e 01 Atmospheric Programs
Off",e 01 J>Jr and Radlalion, U.S. Environmenlal Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (ma~ slOp 6204N]
Washington, DC 20460
e-<na!: harvey.reld@epa.gov
climate change webslle: hllp:/Iwww.epa.gov/globalwarming
clean air markets website: htlp:JJwww.epa.gov/airmarkets
phone: 202-564-9429; lax: 202·565-li673

PhiLCooney@c
eq.eop.gov To: Clare BreldenlchIDCIUSEPAlUS@EPA

n
tT1
;Q 001035
o
o
~
~
'-0
'-0
 cc: -anderson. margot"'
1012912001 ~margol.anderson@hq.doe.gov>, Kathleen
08:13 AM HoganlOCIUSEPAIUS@EPA, Reid
HarveytUCIUSEPAJUS@EPA. peler.karpoll@hq.doe.gcv.
wiDiam hohenstein
<whohensl@melloce.oce.uSda.gov>,
talleyl@slale.gll\I, Kameran_l._Bailey@ceq.eop.gov.
James_Connaughlon@ceq.eop.gov.
Reirsnydenla@slale.gov, Roberl_J.
_TUcdllo@omb.eop.gov
Subject Re: Projections chapter of the
national communication

GrouP.
CEa supports Option 2 as ouUined in Clare Breidenit:h·s e-mail of
10123.
Among ottler reasons, Option 2 assures a complete submission. on time,
and Ihat
is where we have placed the premium In our decislon. I believe we
should stn!
press to have e dill" notice of availabijity for public comment in \he
Federal
Register by November 15 for all chaplers olher than the Projections
chapter,
which would be provided In the Register only a faw weeks later - pUblic
commenls on all chapters would sVlI be due by the end ofDecember.
To all, thank you for providing s~ong perspectives on options for
ploceeding on the Projections Chapter and for your shared ertorls to
produco .e.n
excellenl product for \he U.S. THANK YOU, Phil Cooney, CEa

n
tTJ
D
o
o
---J
00
o
o
 ---'

~ -Karpoll. Pete,- <Peler.Kerpoll@hq.doe.llov>

~ " 10/29/2001 09:49:44 AM

Record Type: Record

To: PM CoaneylCEClEOP
ce:
SUbject RE: Projections chapter of Ule "auana! communication

Thanks for the 2nd email. I nea~y went into shock lIoflen I read /he first
one.

·-<:lriginal Message--
From: Phil_Cooney@ceq.eop.gov%inlemel [maito:Phil_Cooney@ceq.eop.gov)
Se~: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:26 AM
To: PhiLCooney@ceq.eop.gov%intemet
Cc: Anderson. Margot; Karpoff, Peter,
breidenictl.c1ane@epamail.epa.gov%lntemel;
hogan.kathleen@epemall.epa.gov%Jntemet,
harvey.reld@epamail.epa.gov%lntemet,williamhohenstein;
taQeyI@Slate.gov%lntemet, Kemeren_l._Baley@ceq.eap.gov%intemel;
reifsnyderda@stale.gov%internel; RObert_J._Tucelno@omb.eop.goll%intemel
SUbJect: Re: Pnojectlons chapler of the netlonal communication

Group, I meant OPTION 1 -thank you Reid lor bnnglng /hIs 10 my attenDon

thaI's what happen. when you start moving 100 lasl on Monday momin911
Sorry
for the confusion, PHil

n
m
!O
o
o
-.l
00
o