Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V13 (9-13):
(9-13):
The
The
Insync
Insync
Index
Index
byby
Norm
Norm
North
North
INDICATORS
Here's a method to graphically display the signal status for a group of indicators as well as an
algorithm for generating a consensus indicator that shows when these indicators are in sync.
The methods described can be used with any group of indicators.
by Norm North
sing the presignal concept as a base, the algorithm for creating the Insync index, which is a consensus
indicator, is simple and obvious - once you see it. It works consistently well, almost always outperforming its
component indicators. A user should be able to implement and test it, to some extent using many of the more
comprehensive technical analysis programs available today. Basically, the Insync index shows that when a majority
of indicators is in sync, a turning point is near. By using the index as a filter, large databases can be scanned quickly
Copyright (c) Technical Analysis Inc.
FIGURE 1: ALLIEDSIGNAL INC. This chart shows Wilder's RSI presignal areas, buy and
sell lines, and lower and upper thresholds. A buy signal occurs when the indicator is below the
lower threshold and crosses above it.
This type of indicator is committed to fire a buy or sell signal whenever it first descends below the lower threshold or
rises above the upper threshold, respectively. It is simply a matter of time before it fires a signal. A
threshold-crossing indicator is in a prebuy signal area when it is below the lower threshold and in a presell signal
area when it is above the upper threshold.
The presignal concept is not new. Greg Morris and I first used presignal areas for filtering candlestick signals with
%D in 1991. The presignal areas are the same as the overbought and oversold areas historically used with
threshold-crossing indicators. We extended the presignal concept to zero-crossing oscillators, for which overbought
and oversold areas were not defined then but can be now, and that is one of the reasons for the different terminology.
The other more important reason is that, as the term implies, the indicator is committed to fire a signal when it is in its
presignal area.
The presignal area concept can also be defined for zero-crossing oscillators. With these indicators, a signal is issued
when the indicator crosses a trailing moving average buy line or sell line. (Usually the buy line and sell line are the
same moving average.) Both buy and sell signals can be seen in Figure 2. As depicted, a buy signal is issued when
the indicator is below the buy line moving average and then crosses above it when the buy line is less than zero.
FIGURE 2: MACD PRESIGNAL AREA CONCEPTS. The presignal area concept can
also be defined for zero-crossing oscillators. With these indicators, a signal is issued when the
indicator crosses a trailing moving average buy line or sell line.
Conversely, a sell signal is generated when the indicator is above the sell line moving average and then crosses
below it when the sell line is above zero. Thus, for zero-crossing oscillators, the prebuy signal area starts when the
indicator is below the buy line and the buy line first goes below zero, because the indicator is committed to fire a buy
signal then. Similarly, the presell signal area starts when the indicator is above the sell line and the sell line first goes
above zero, because it is committed to fire a sell signal. Again, a signal is inevitable.
For both indicator types, the presignal areas show when an indicator is committed to fire either a buy signal or a sell
signal. In Figures 1 and 2, these areas are easily identified by sequences of open boxes (prebuy and bullish) and
solid boxes (presell and bearish). By definition, a signal is issued at the end of a presignal area. When two or more
indicators are in the same presignal area, they are in sync with each other, committed to fire the same type of signal.
CHARTING PRESIGNAL AREAS
Figures 1 and 2 each show the history of one indicator along with sequences of open and solid boxes showing when
that indicator was in its respective prebuy and presell signal areas. What can be done when you want to compare two
or more indicators - say, 10?
In that case, two indicators can be compared by vertically stacking just the indicator plots, as can be seen in Figures 1
and 2. While this can also be accomplished for three or four indicators with less satisfying results, plotting all this
information for 10 indicators stacked on top of each other on a single chart becomes hard to read. One alternative
would be to chart each indicator in its own window, but not having a common time line makes comparisons difficult.
A compromise becomes necessary. The most important factor is whether an indicator is primed to fire, so just
plotting the presignal areas displays germane information. By giving up the less relevant details, a great deal of
information can be conveyed on a single chart.
Figure 3, an example of this concept, displays the presignal areas for 10 indicators along with the price. Pertinent
information concerning the 10 indicators and how they relate to price and to each other can be seen at a glance. For
Copyright (c) Technical Analysis Inc.
each of the 10 indicators, the prebuy signal areas are shown by sequences of open boxes and the presell signa areas
are shown by solid boxes. It is important to remember that each one of these sequences, regardless of length,
terminates with a buy or sell signal. Visualize a down arrow at the end of each sequence of solid boxes and an up
arrow at the end of each sequence of open boxes.
In Figure 3, the first presignal sequence pertains to the consensus indicator (that is, the Insync index). The 10
component indicators used here are identified by acronym along with the number of periods used in their calculation
(Figure 4). The number and length of presignal areas vary significantly for each indicator, and many of the indicators
issue spurious signals to some extent, which is representative of what is generally observed. For any given period,
indicators are said to be in sync if they are in the same prebuy or presell signal area. As shown in Figure 3, the price
is usually approaching a local high or low where the number of indicators that are in sync is near a maximum.
These cases are identified by the sequences of boxes at the top of Figure 3. The sequences show when 80% or more
of the indicators are in sync; at least eight out of 10 are in prebuy areas (open boxes) or in presell areas (solid boxes).
The percentage threshold can be changed to any desired level. These sequences at the top of the chart form the basis
for creating the Insync index.
FORMING A CONSENSUS INDICATOR
Figure 5 shows the same data in Figure 3, plus the Insync consensus indicator plotted at the top of the chart. The
values of the consensus indicator are simply the net sum of all its component indicators' prebuy and presell signal
areas at any given time, expressed as an index - the Insync index. For each point in time, the consensus indicator
reflects the net sum of the prebuy (minus) and presell (plus) signal areas displayed directly below it. The scaling is
from zero to 100, with zero representing the condition where all the indicators are in their prebuy signal areas, and
100 indicating that all the indicators are in their presell signal areas. A value of 50% is neutral (prebuys equal
presells).
Copyright (c) Technical Analysis Inc.
FIGURE 4: Here, the 10 component indicators are identified by acronym as well as the type of
crossing used.
Nothing could be simpler. No neural networks. No artificial intelligence. Just simple arithmetic! And it's easy to
check visually. For 10 indicators, each presignal is worth five percentage points (remember that on this scale, a value
of 50 is neutral). To calculate the value at any point, take the number of presells minus prebuys, multiply by 5 and
add 50.
Note the two threshold lines drawn at values of 10 and 90 on the Insync plot shown in Figure 5. Testing has shown
that these values are close to optimum for producing near-term signals. These values translate to a percentage
requirement of 80% for both buy and sell. In this example, eight out of the 10 indicators must be in sync and none
out of sync. When 80% of the indicators are in sync, the appropriate presignal sequence is shown above the
consensus plot, again using open and solid boxes. Changing the thresholds to values corresponding to 90% and
100% produce intermediate- to long-term signals.
HOW IT WORKS
The best way of demonstrating how well the consensus indicator works is to compare it with the performance of its
own component indicators. To do this, trades were simulated for all the component indicators and the consensus
indicator on several sets of data. The trading was conducted only on the long side of the market (buy to open and sell
to close). No short sales were simulated. The results of these simulations are presented in Figures 6, 7 and 8 for
trades using the Dow Jones 30, the Standard & Poor's 100, and 39 continuous futures contracts.
Figures 6, 7 and 8 show the Insync consensus indicator and the 10 component indicators ranked in order of their
performance on an average gain per trade basis. The performance of the Insync index is shown for three different
pairs of threshold settings: 10 and 90, five and 95, and zero and 100. These values translate to 80%, 90% and 100%
for the required percentage of indicators to be in sync.
FIGURE 6: Here are the results of simulations presented for trades using the Dow Jones 30. The
Insync is shown and the component indicators ranked in order of their performance on an average
gain per trade basis.
The trading strategy for the Insync consensus indicator is similar to that used by other threshold crossing indicators
(the relative strength index, %K, %D and so on). A sell signal is issued when the indicator rises above the upper
threshold and then crosses it going down. Conversely, a buy signal is issued when the Insync index descends below
the lower threshold and then crosses it in an upward direction. Relating this to the component indicators means that
the required percentage of indicators must be in their presignal areas and ready to fire and then one or more of them
must fire to trigger the Insync signal.
FIGURE 7: Here are the results of simulations presented for trades using the Standard & Poor's
100. The Insync is shown and the component indicators ranked in order of their performance on
an average gain per trade basis.
The simulated trading results presented in Figures 6, 7 and 8 cover 450 days of trading using the indicated buy lines
and sell lines (thresholds or trailing moving averages) for each indicator. The tabulated data include the number of
tickers that showed gains and the total average gain per trade (%) for those tickers. Similar data is also tabulated for
losses. The basis for ranking is the net difference (net gain %), not including the best gain and worst loss. The
importance of the results is in each indicator's relative position, not the absolute value achieved by each indicator.
FIGURE 8: Here are the results simulations presented for trades using continous futures
contracts. The Insync is shown and the component indicators ranked in order of their performance
on an average trade per gain basis.
Figures 6, 7 and 8 results clearly show that the Insync index almost always outperforms its component indicators,
whose performances vary. All three figures show that increasing the percentage requirement results in fewer signals,
as would be expected, but it also produces higher net gains in most cases. Total gainers and losers do not always add
up to the total tickers. For some tickers, no signals were generated for that particular indicator. This is particularly
evident when the Insync thresholds are set at zero and 100, requiring all component indicators to be in sync. It is also
exhibited by RSI and money flow index (MFI), the values of which do not generally have wide excursions.
As a matter of interest, Bollinger's oscillator (%B) is the most common trigger indicator.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the Insync index provides a means of representing, and even enhancing, the output of a group of
component indicators. It can be used to scan large (or small) databases extremely quickly.
Norm North is president of North Systems (formerly N-Squared Computing) and has been developing technical
analysis software since 1981.
REFERENCES AND RESOURCES
Hartle, Thom [1994]. "Gerald Appel, with Systems and Forecasts ," Technical Analysis of STOCKS &
COMMODITIES, Volume 12: March.
Morris, Greg [1991]. "Candlesticks and stochastics," Technical Analysis of STOCKS & COMMODITIES, Volume
9: August.