Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Volume 6, Issue 11, Nov 2015, pp. 16-22, Article ID: IJMET_06_11_002
Available online at
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=6&IType=11
ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359
IAEME Publication
1. INTRODUCTION
Heat exchanger is a most important device used to transfer heat from one fluid stream
to another. They are widely used in the various engineering applications. Their design
requirement is to increase the energy saving and to decrease the cost. The way to
improve the global performances of plate heat exchangers is to find efficient heat
transfer surfaces which do not induce much pressure loss. Corrugated plate heat
exchangers are used to increase the thermal performance and higher compactness.
Breaking and destabilizing in the thermal boundary layer are occurred as fluid flowing
through the corrugated surfaces. Many researchers have studied on the heat transfer
characteristics of the corrugated channels. Experimental and numerical studies were
performed by Sunden and S.Trollheden on the heat transfer and pressure drop in the
corrugated channels and the smooth tubes. It was found that the heat transfer obtained
from the corrugated channel was 3.5 times higher than that from the smooth tube. The
pressure drop in the corrugated channel is 56 times larger than that from a smooth
channel. Fabbri has studied the laminar convective heat transfer in a channel
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
16
editor@iaeme.com
composed of the smooth and corrugated walls. The heat transfer performance of the
corrugated wall channel was compared with that of a smooth wall. Hamza et al. have
experimentally studied effects of the operating parameters on laminar flow forced
convection heat transfer of air flowing in a channel having a V-corrugated upper
plate. The experiments were performed for Reynolds number and tilting angles of
channel in the ranges of 7502050, and 060, respectively. To determine the optimal
design and operating conditions of heat exchangers, the performance of heat
exchanger should be evaluated correctly. It is thus needed to develop an accurate and
reliable evaluation method. Presently the evaluation criteria of the performance of
heat exchangers fall into two catalogues: the entropy evaluation method and the
exergy evaluation method. In the analysis and design of heat exchangers, it is
necessary to evaluate the entropy generation/exergy destruction due to heat exchange
and pressure drop as a function of the design variables selected for the optimization
analysis. Bejan presented a method for fixed or minimum number of entropy
generation units in counter flow heat exchangers for gas-to-gas applications. He also
investigated a heat exchanger with heat transfer loss and frictional pressure drop in
channels, and reported heat exchanger effectiveness using the entropy generation
number. Boyd et al. demonstrated that it was possible to design an optimal heat
exchanger based on the second law of thermodynamics to minimize the loss of
available work. Sarangi and Chowdhury analyzed the entropy generation in a counter
flow heat exchanger and discussed some formal mathematical consequences of
entropy generation.. Sekuli estimated the quality of the heat exchange process in heat
exchanger analysis using the entropy generation. Durmus et al studied experimentally
forced convection heat transfer and pressure drop in plate heat exchangers having
different surface profiles. The results show that the efficiency of the heat exchanger
increases with increasing the fluids' contact surface, pressure drop and mass flow rates
due to an enhanced heat transfer to the fluid. Pandey et al. carried out heat transfer
and pressure drop studies on a sinusoidal plate heat exchanger. The results show that
the results show that the average energy loss in PHE with rectangular wavy surface is
about 79.53% of that with the rectangular geometry.
2. NOMENCLATURE
A
c
C
Dh
E
h
L
M
P
Pr
Q
Re
T
V
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
17
editor@iaeme.com
Suffixes
c Cold
e Environment, ambient
h Hot
I Inlet
max Maximum
o Outlet
min Minimum
3. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
The photograph of the experimental setup, fabricated with 22 gauge GI sheets to
investigate the heat transfer characteristics of the plate heat exchanger channels for
same flow conditions with different inlet hot water temperatures are shown in (Figure
1). It includes a hot water loop, two coolant loop and a measurement system. The hot
water loop comprises a water tank, a heater, and a water pump. The cold water loop
comprises a water tank, and a water pump. A digital temperature indicator with
thermocouples is used to measure temperatures at inlet and exit of the hot and cold
streams. The flow rate is measured by noting down time for collection of fixed volume
of the fluid. The whole system is thermally insulated to minimize the energy loss.
Figure 1 Photographs of sinusoidal wavy corrugated plates used in plate heat exchanger .
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
18
editor@iaeme.com
Values of heat given by hot fluid and heat absorbed by cold fluid, calculated in the
present experiment showed that there was negligible loss of heat to the surroundings
due to proper insulation of the heat exchanger. For such heat exchanger,W=0 and Q =
0, and exergy loss for a steady state open system can be found as a sum of those for
the individual fluids, i.e.,
E = Eh + Ec
The exergy changes for the two fluids are obtained as given below:
For hot fluid (i.e. water),
Eh = Te[mh (sho - shi )]
or Eh = Te[Ch ln(Tho -Thi )]
The exergy loss caused by pressure drop is not to be considered for liquids
because E also contains the exergy loss caused by the pressure drop. Besides the
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
19
editor@iaeme.com
exergy loss, the effectiveness of the PHE is calculated from experimental observations
using the following equation:
=[ Cc(Tco - Tci ]/[Cmin (Thi - Tci )]
Physical properties, and m of the fluid are evaluated at its mean Bulk
temperature.
Qmax (W)
5000
4000
3000
Parallel Flow
2000
Counter Flow
1000
0
40
45
50
55
60
Temperature (0 C)
120
Exergy (W)
100
80
Parallel Flow
60
Counter Flow
40
20
0
40
45
0C
Temperature
50
55
60
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
20
editor@iaeme.com
0.024
0.022
E/Qmax
0.02
0.018
0.016
Parallel flow
0.014
Counter flow
0.012
0.01
40
45
50
55
60
Temperature 0 C
Variation of exergy loss with hot fluid inlet temperature for a fixed cold fluid inlet
temperature is given in Figure 4 for both parallel and counter flow arrangements.
Exergy loss is less at low inlet hot temperature relative to the high inlet hot
temperature. This observation may be attributed to increased temperature resulting in
the increase in irreversibility which is responsible for increase in exergy loss. It is also
observed that with rise in inlet hot water temperature, exergy loss is more in counter
flow arrangement than in parallel flow arrangement, which is in accordance with the
results found by Pandey et. al. [2011].
Variation of Exergy loss (E/Q max ) with inlet hot water temperature is shown in
Figure 5 for a constant inlet cold water temperature. It may be seen that the (E/Q max )
is more in parallel flow arrangement than in the counter flow arrangement.
CONCLUSION
1. A three channel 1-1 pass corrugated with corrugation angle 450 plate type heat
exchanger was fabricated.
2. Performance of plate heat exchanger at different input heat load was measured in
parallel and counter flow arrangement.
3. Exergy analysis was performed to find its behavior in parallel and counter flow
arrangement.
4. Effectiveness in counter low is 44.5% more than parallel flow arrangement.
5. Exergy loss was found 7.2% more in parallel flow than in counter flow arrangement.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
21
editor@iaeme.com
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
22
editor@iaeme.com