Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LTD
December / 2012
Hydropower Department
2/61
Table of Contents
Page
ANNEXURES................................................................................................................................ 3
Annexure 1STAAD PRO- Analysis Results.................................................................................... 3
Annexure 2Structural Design of different components. ................................................................... 3
LIST OF REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 3
1
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4
1.1
1.2
3.1
4.1
4.2
5.1
5.2
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.3
5.4
LOAD COMBINATIONS...........................................................................................13
6.1
6.1.1
6.1.2
CRANE BEAM...........................................................................................................13
Modelling & Analysis .................................................................................................13
Design Criteria ............................................................................................................14
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.3
6.3.1
6.4
TIE BEAMS................................................................................................................15
3/61
6.4.1
6.5
6.5.1
6.6
6.6.1
RESULTS ...................................................................................................................16
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
8.1
Crane-Beams ...............................................................................................................20
8.2
Crane-Columns ...........................................................................................................20
8.3
Floor-Beams ................................................................................................................20
8.4
Tie-Beams ...................................................................................................................21
8.5
Intermediate-Columns .................................................................................................21
CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................22
ANNEXURES
Annexure 1
Annexure 2
LIST OF REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
4/61
INTRODUCTION
Sainj hydro-electric project is located on the Sainj River which is a tributary of Beas
River near village Niharni in Kullu district of Himachal Pradesh. The Sainj
Hydroelectric Project is a run off the river scheme. The main components of diversion
structures are a six gated barrage including intake structure. The intake structure is
located at the right bank of sainj barge. At d/s of Intake structure, two underground
intake ducts are proposed that shall bifurcate to connect the two underground desander
caverns for desilting purpose. The water conductor system includes a 6360.75 m long
headrace tunnel, a surge shaft and a pressure shaft. An underground powerhouse
complex consists of Powerhouse cavern and transformer bay cavern. The Power house
Cavern consists of erection bay, machine bays and auxiliary bay. The machine bay is
sized to house two nos of Pelton TG units of 50MW each.
1.1
1.2
To check whether the maximum foundation stresses are within the limit of safe
bearing capacity.
This report is limited to the structural design of crane column, crane beam & tie
beam. The dowel reinforcement left for second stage construction for floor beam
& intermediate column locations is also proposed.
A separate report will be submitted for analysis and structural design of floor slabs
after receiving the actual cut out in slabs from E&M vendor.
5/61
1359.7
masl
1354.4
masl
1336.0
masl
1.0m x 1.0m
EL. 1336m
6/61
1.0m x 1.2m
EL. 1359.70m
0.4m x 0.6m
EL. 1354.40m
7/61
Figure 3: Typical Model Geometry- Unit-1 (Isometric view-2)- Second stage concrete
model.
1.0m x 1.0m
1.0m x 1.2m
0.5m x 0.5m
0.5m x 0.8m
0.4m x 0.6m
0.4m
8/61
General arrangement drawings of Power House can be referred from DWG No:
71.1994.08.011 TO 71.1994.08.016 & from DWG. No: 71.1994.08.021 TO
71.1994.08.023.
STAAD.Pro is used for frame analysis. Two different models as shown in figure 1 & 2
are used for analyzing first stage and second stage construction of Power house
complex. Limit State method ( IS 456 :2000) is followed for structural design of various
elements.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
3.1
CONCRETE PROPERTIES
Concrete of grade
Unit weight of
24.00 kN/m3
Poissons ratio
0.17
Youngs modulus
150 T/m2
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
The following boundary conditions are assumed in the numerical analysis of the first &
second stage concrete model:
4.1
4.2
The nodes of bottom of Crane columns (EL. 1336.00 m) are considered as fixed
in all degree of freedom. (Refer figure 4)
9/61
Figure 5: Fixity Boundary condition shown for Full second stage model.
10/61
5.1
11/61
DEAD LOAD
Dead load of unit weight of RCC as 25 kN/m3 is assumed.
5.2
CRANE LOAD
The load considered for EOT crane mounted at the top of the beam are following
5.2.1
5.2.2
196 kN
245 kN
Wheel base
7.0 m
15.0 m
4 nos
12 kN
12 kN
480.12 kN
240 kN
600.7 kN
Wheel base
7.0 m
15.0 m
4 nos
24 kN
24 kN
15 kPa
15 kPa
5.3
12/61
EARTHQUAKE LOAD
Response spectrum of IS: 1893-2002 has been used for seismic analysis. It is assumed that
the construction site falls in Zone IV of earthquake zoning map of ref [2]. As per Ref. [2],
the horizontal peak ground accelerations for Zone IV (Z) is 0.24g. Further 50% reduction
in horizontal spectral acceleration has been assumed, since the structure is underground
with hard rock strata.
Vertical seismic coefficient is taken as 2/3 of horizontal acceleration (Ref. [2]). The
Importance factor (I), reduction factor (R) are taken 1.5 & 5 respectively. Further 5%
damping is assumed in the structure.
Ah =
Horizontal Seismic Spectral Coefficient, h (Cl.6.4.2) =
Vertical Seismic Spectral Coefficient, v
Z I Sa
* *
2 R g = 0.032g
Ah =
Horizontal Seismic Spectral Coefficient, h (Cl.6.4.2) =
Vertical Seismic Spectral Coefficient, v
Z I Sa
* *
2 R g = 0.017g
13/61
Ah =
Horizontal Seismic Spectral Coefficient, h (Cl.6.4.2) =
Vertical Seismic Spectral Coefficient, v
Z I Sa
* *
2 R g = 0.09g
Ah =
Horizontal Seismic Spectral Coefficient, h (Cl.6.4.2) =
Vertical Seismic Spectral Coefficient, v
Z I Sa
* *
2 R g = 0.053g
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Following loading combinations have been considered in the analysis of power house
complex for both models.
1. Self weight of structure + Crane Load (static load).
2. Self weight of structure + Crane Load (dynamic load).
3. Self weight of structure + 50% Crane Static (Parked crane Load) + Earthquake
load (100 % x direction + 30% z direction).
4. Self weight of structure + 50% Crane Static (Parked crane Load) + Earthquake
load (100 % z direction + 30% x direction).
6.1
CRANE BEAM
6.1.1
14/61
dead weight together will rail dead weight is applied as line load of 3 kN/m. The crane
beam is connected integrally with crane columns.
6.1.2
Design Criteria
Crane beam will be designed for the load combination mentioned in sec 5.4, where full
crane load as mentioned in sec 5.2.2 will be considered for structural design. The most
critical location of the wheel loads that can induce the maximum vertical bending
moment will be located by using moving load option in Staad-pro. Similarly the most
critical location of wheel loads that can induce the maximum shear force will be located.
The depth of crane beam will be checked for the permissible deflection. The Crane
beam will be designed for maximum bending moment, torsion & shear force. The
reinforcement will also to be checked for the lateral bending moment in the crane beam.
Ductile detailing will be done for beams as per IS:13920
Refer Annexure-I & II for analysis results & structural design of Crane beam. Refer
Table 1a & 1b for critical bending moment values.
6.2
CRANE COLUMNS
6.2.1
6.2.2
Design Criteria
Structural design of Crane column of First stage concrete model will be done for the
maximum bending moments & axial force resulted from two independent analyses. In
the first analysis, first stage concrete model will be analyzed for the load combination
mentioned in sec 5.4, where crane load as mentioned in sec 5.2.1 will be considered. In
the second analysis, second stage concrete model will be analyzed for the load
combination mentioned in sec 5.4, where crane & floor load as mentioned in sec 5.2.2
will be considered. The Crane Column will be designed for biaxial bending moment &
axial load induced by the most critical load combination from the two independent
analyses. At the elevation of crane beam & tie beam, the crane column should have
monolithical connection. Dowels will be left in column of first stage model for later
stage raft & beam construction in second stage concreting. The dowels/reinforcement
diameter & spacing will be done on the basis of structural analysis of second stage full
model. Ductile detailing will be done for columns as per IS:13920. Refer Annexure-I &
II for analysis results & structural design of crane columns. Refer Table 2 for possible
critical bending moment & axial force values of columns.
6.3
FLOOR BEAMS
6.3.1
Design Criteria
15/61
Intermediate floor beams will be designed for the load combination mentioned in sec
5.4, where full crane & floor load as mentioned in sec 5.2.2 will be considered for
structural design. The second stage concrete model is considered for the structural
design of intermediate floor beam to calculate the reinforcement in the beam so as to
leave sufficient dowel reinforcement at Crane column interface. Refer Annexure-I & II
for analysis results & structural design of Floor beams. Refer Table 3a & 3b for critical
design loads.
6.4
TIE BEAMS
6.4.1
Design Criteria
Tie beams will be designed for the load combination mentioned in sec 5.4, where full
crane load as mentioned in sec 5.2.2 will be considered for structural design. The
second stage concrete model is considered for the structural design of tie beam to
calculate the reinforcement in the beam as this load combination will generate
maximum bending moments.
Refer Annexure-I & II for analysis results & structural design of tie beams. Refer Table
4a & 4b for critical design loads.
6.5
6.5.1
Design Criteria
Intermediate floor Columns will be designed for the load combination mentioned in sec
5.4, where full crane & floor load as mentioned in sec 5.2.2 will be considered for
structural design. The second stage concrete model is considered for the structural
design of intermediate floor column to calculate the reinforcement in the column so as
to leave sufficient dowel reinforcement from MIV floor raft. Refer Annexure-I & II for
analysis results & structural design of intermediate floor column. Refer Table 5 for
critical design loads.
6.6
6.6.1
Design Criteria
A 0.9m thick concrete raft is proposed at MIV floor. During first stage concreting phase,
this raft is integrally connected along the interface of circular tailrace pit. Hence no
separate foundation for Crane columns or floor columns is foreseen. The Crane
16/61
Columns at U/s side shall start from MIV floor raft, where as the Crane Columns at D/s
side shall also start from MIV floor level and is integrally connected with a 1m thick
concrete wall of C/w Duct. The reinforcement for D/s Crane Columns is proposed to
start from bottom of the C/w Duct wall foundation to result more conservative design.
Further a 32mm dia grouted rock bolts have been proposed to connect the concrete raft
to foundation rock integrally. By adopting the stitching mechanism of concrete to rock,
it results very nominal flexure in the raft. Further, an adequate reinforcement of 20mm
dia @ 250mm c/c is proposed at top and bottom side both ways of the raft.
RESULTS
Structural designs of individual members are mentioned in Annexure- II.
7.1
END-2
Hogging
Span
Sagging
1540
1930
1340
Factored values
1.5
1.5
1.5
3330
2310
2895
2160
2010
17/61
Moment type
Un-factored Moment
(kNm)
Un-factored shear
(kN)
END-1
Hogging
END-2
Hogging
Span
Sagging
1100
661
1050
1040
903
Factored values
Factor of Safety
1.5
1.5
1.5
Factored Moment
(kNm)
1650
992
1575
1560
1355
The moments and Shear obtained from STAAD results have been modified for Torsion
as per Cl. 41.3.1 and Cl. 41.4.2 of IS 456: 2000. The summary of the required
reinforcement is given in Annexure II.
7.2
Column D-Line
Top
Bottom
Column B-line
Top
Bottom
Column B-line
Top
Bottom
Moment( My)
IN PLANE
kNm
1430
188
Moment( Mz)
OUT OF
PLANE kNm
45
171
Axial Force
kN
1290
1289
1070
46
207
161
Factored Values
1.5
1.5
2145
67.5
282
257
1480
1475
1605
311
2220
2213
69
242
1.5
1935
1934
Note: Critical column from analysis is located at the intersection of B & 2 grid lines,
between the EL 1354.1 & 1359.1 of 4.1m clear distance.
Only the most critical column is presented in Annexure-I for structural design from
Table 2.
7.3
18/61
Moment type
Un-factored
Moment (kNm)
Un-factored shear
(kN)
Hogging
Hogging
Sagging
226
201
132
135
82
Torsion (kN)
153
Factor of Safety
Factored Moment
(kNm)
Factored shear
(kN)
1.5
Torsion (kN)
Factored values
1.5
339
302
203
123
1.5
198
229.5
Moment type
Un-factored Moment
(kNm)
Un-factored shear
(kN)
Hogging
Sagging
205
82
107
130
70
Torsion (kN)
83
Factor of Safety
Factored Moment
(kNm)
1.5
308
123
195
105
Torsion (kN)
7.4
Hogging
Factored values
1.5
1.5
161
124.5
19/61
Hogging
Hogging
Sagging
148
130
10
93
1.2
89
Factored values
1.2
178
156
112
107
1.2
12
7.5
Hogging
Hogging
Sagging
94
82
15
26
1.2
13
Factored values
1.2
Factor of Safety
Factored Moment
(kNm)
113
98
31
16
1.2
18
20/61
REINFORCEMENT PROPOSED
8.1
Crane-Beams
The summary of Proposed Reinforcement in Crane-Beams is as shown in Table 7
Table 7: Summary of Proposed Reinforcement in Crane-Beams
Sl.
No.
Beam
Top
Reinforcement
Bottom
Reinforcement
Shear
Remarks
Reinforcement*
10m
Span
10 Nos. 36 Dia
9 Nos. 36 Dia
7m
Span
5 Nos. 36 Dia
5 Nos. 36 Dia
Crane-Columns
The summary of Proposed Reinforcement in crane-columns is as shown below in Table 8
Table 8: Summary of Proposed Reinforcement in Crane-Columns (Model-1)
Sl.
Column
Column Each Face Transverse hoop
No.
Reinforcement
Reinforcement*
1
12 @100 c/c
Floor-Beams
The summary of Proposed Reinforcement in Floor-Beams is as shown in Table 9.
21/61
Sl.
No
.
Beam
Top
Reinforcement
Bottom
Reinforcement
Shear
Reinforcement*
At
EL.1347.77
5 Nos. 25 Dia
4 Nos. 25 Dia
12 @200
( 4 legged)
4 Nos. 25 Dia
12 @300
( 4 legged)
Tie-Beams
The summary of Proposed Reinforcement in Tie-Beams is as shown in Table 10.
Table 10: Summary of Proposed Reinforcement in Tie-Beams
Sl.
No.
Tie Beam
Top
Reinforcement
Bottom
Reinforcement
Shear
Reinforcement*
4 Nos. 20 Dia
12 @300
( 2 legged)
c/c
3 Nos. 20 Dia
12 @300
( 2 legged)
c/c
Intermediate-Columns
The summary of Proposed Reinforcement in intermediate-columns is as shown below
in Table 11.
Table 11: Summary of Proposed Reinforcement in Intermediate Columns.
Sl.
Column
Column Each Face
Transverse hoop
No.
Reinforcement
Reinforcement*
1
12 @100 c/c
22/61
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the analysis following conclusion can be made
The proposed reinforcement for various concrete elements is designed for most
critical load combinations.
Continuous raft is provided as the crane column footings.
The maximum vertical deflection in the crane beam (10 m span beam center to center
) is of 8.2mm for the critical load combination.
The maximum horizontal deflection in the frame structure ( first stage model) is of
12.5 mm for the critical load combination, which is under allowable limit of 25mm
Expansion joint.
The bending moments developed at crane column footing are not significiant,
therefore Nominal reinforcement of 20mm dia at 250mm spacing c/c is provided.
ANNEXURE-I
(STAAD PRO- Analysis Results)
FIRST STAGE STAAD MODEL
23/61
24/61
2220 kNm
1670 kNm
1260 kNm
661 kNm
1050 kNm
1930 kNm
Figure 1: Unfactored Bending moment diagram envelope for Crane Beam along D-line.
1440 kN
903 kN
1040 kN
1340 kN
Figure 2: Unfactored Shear Force diagram envelope for Crane Beam along D-line.
Note: Critical Bending moment and shear force location for crane beam (along D-line) occurs when
right most crane wheel is approx. 1.2m from the right most column.
Figure 3: Unfactored Out of Plane Bending moment envelope for Crane Column along D-line.
Note: Critical out of plane Bending moment for crane column (along D-line) occurs when right
most crane wheel are to at right most part of the structure.
25/61
26/61
Figure 4: Unfactored Maximum Inplane Bending moment diagram at bottom of the Crane Column
( along D-line). ( result of load combination with seismic load)
Figure 5: Unfactored Maximum Inplane Bending moment diagram at top of the Crane Column
(along D-line).( right most crane wheel is approx. 1.2m from the right most column)
27/61
28/61
Figure 6: Unfactored Maximum Axial force diagram for Crane Column ( right most crane wheel is
approx. 1.2m from the right most column)
1060 kN
1660 kN
29/61
300 kN
888 kN
Figure 7: Unfactored Maximum Axial force diagram for Crane Column. (CG of the crane wheel is
exactly at the middle crane column)
30/61
31/61
154 kNm
145 kNm
197 kNm
117 kNm
83 kNm
106 kNm
201 kNm
152 kNm
116 kNm
226kNm
132 kNm
126 kNm
92 kNm
123 kNm
115 kNm
Figure 8: Vertical INPLANE bending moment envelope for floor beam at EL. 1347.770.
32/61
50 kN
75 kN
92 kN
72 kN
72 kN
135 kN
82 kN
33/61
85 kNm
142 kNm
46 kNm
178 kNm
65 kNm
205 kNm
73 kNm
128 kNm
90 kNm
198kNm
156 kNm
90 kNm
70 kNm
107 kNm
Figure 10: Vertical INPLANE bending moment envelope for floor beam at EL. 1343.40.
41 kNm
34/61
51 kNm
24 kNm
99 kNm
40 kNm
133 kNm
122 kNm
68 kNm
40 kNm
18 kNm
71 kNm
75 kNm
59 kNm
101 kNm
51 kNm
59 kNm
Figure 11: Vertical INPLANE bending moment envelope for floor beam at EL. 1339.720.
35/61
935 kNm
1070 kNm
661 kNm
182 kNm
435 kNm
200 kNm
222 kNm
502 kNm
288 kNm
141 kNm
515 kNm
145 kNm
68 kNm
98 kNm
113 kNm
34 kNm
43 kNm
68 kNm
33 kNm
10 kNm
70 kNm
Figure 12: Unfactored Inplane Bending moment envelope at top of the Crane Column (along D-line).
Note: Critical bending moment location occurs when right most crane wheel is approx. 1.2m from the
right most column.
Figure 13: Unfactored Out of plane Bending moment envelope of crane column along D line.
36/61
37/61
825 kN
161 kN
2140 kN
435 kN
2320 kN
720 kN
2570 kN
470 kN
380 kN
360 kN
962 kN
2310 kN
Figure 14: Unfactored axial force diagram of Crane Column (along D-line).
Note: Results shown when the CG of crane is exactly at the top of the middle column
38/61
2000 kN
1120 kN
1360kN
1640 kN
1930 kN
1180 kN
844 kN
716 kN
1510 kN
Figure 15: Unfactored axial force diagram of Crane Column (along D-line).
Note: Results shown when right most crane wheel is approx. 1.2m from grid No: 2.
Figure 16: Unfactored Inplane Bending moment envelope of Tie Beam (along B-line)
Figure 17: Unfactored shear force diagram envelope of Tie beam along B line
39/61
626 kNm
40/61
1230 kNm
23 kNm
1430 kNm
353 kNm
193 kNm
411 kNm
458 kNm
422 kNm
172 kNm
91 kNm
46 kNm
83 kNm
30 kNm
24 kNm
1 kNm
19 kNm
5 kNm
Figure 18: Unfactored Inplane Bending moment envelope at top of the Crane Column (along B-line).
Note: Critical bending moment location occurs when right most crane wheel is approx. 1.2m from the
right most column.
41/61
580 kNm
552 kNm
108 kNm
497 kNm
65 kNm
15 kNm
62 kNm
17 kNm
8 kNm
75 kNm
1 kNm
21 kNm
Figure 19: Unfactored Out of plane Bending moment envelope of crane column along B line.
42/61
27 kNm
21 kNm
10 kNm
35 kNm
88 kNm
7 kNm
85 kNm
30kNm
69 kNm
20kNm
35 kNm
2 kNm
66 kNm
37 kNm
10 kNm
8 kNm
15 kNm
5 kNm
2 kNm
43/61
31 kNm
27 kNm
17 kNm
74 kNm
59 kNm
30 kNm
11 kNm
57 kNm
14 kNm
44 kNm
3 kNm
30 kNm
26 kNm
8 kNm
8 kNm
Figure 21: Unfactored Out of plane Bending moment envelope of Intermediate Columns.
44/61
260 kNm
507 kNm
141 kNm
351 kNm
244 kNm
219 kNm
284 kNm
472 kNm
421 kNm
566 kNm
536 kNm
ANNEXURE-II
(Structural Design of Different Components)
45/61
46/61
fck
30 Mpa
fy
500 Mpa
d'
40 mm
1100 mm
1000 mm
Diameter of Stirrup
12 mm
36 mm
1030 mm
3330 kN-m
2895 kN-m
=
=
2895 kN-m
2
7335 mm
2708 mm
36 mm
1018 mm
Design Input:
Design Loads:
(Refer STAAD file for the Loads and Load combinations)
Design Moments
0.5
}xbxd
fy
Provide 9 -
7.2
36 dia bars
Mu
3330 kN-m
Tu
147 kN-m
Mt
182 kN-m
3512 kN-m
9216 mm
2892 mm
36 mm
1018 mm
Tu x ((1+D/b) /1.7)
0.5
}xbxd
fy
Provide 10 - 36
9.1
47/61
1100 mm
Width of beam
1000 mm
2
550 mm
Minimum each side face reinforcement as per IS 456 - 2000 cl. 26.5.1.3(0.05%*b*d)
20 mm
2
314 mm
Number of bars
1.8
336 mm
Vu
Tu
1000 mm
2395 kN
2
2.33 N/mm
Ve = Vu+ 1.6*Tu/b
Ve
ve = Ve/(b*d)
ve
2160 kN
147 kN-m
As
0.99 %
3.52
Design shear strength of section for the provided tensile reinf. at support
2
0.65 N/mm
sv
100 mm
12 mm
b1
896 mm
d1
960 mm
Asv
246 mm2
Asv
2
385 mm
2
385 mm
2
113 mm
Asv =( (ve-c)*b*Sv)/(0.87*fy)
3.4
48/61
fck
30 Mpa
fy
500 Mpa
d'
40 mm
Design Input:
Overall Depth of the Beam
1100 mm
1000 mm
Diameter of Stirrup
12 mm
36 mm
1030 mm
Design Loads:
(Refer STAAD file for the Loads and Load combinations)
Design Moments
Maximum Factored Support Moment at Top
992 kN-m
1575 kN-m
=
=
1575 kN-m
2
3744 mm
2708 mm
36 mm
1018 mm
3.7
992 kN-m
0.5
}xbxd
fy
2
Mu
Factored Torsion
Tu
123 kN-m
Mt
152 kN-m
1143 kN-m
2669 mm
2892 mm
36 mm
1018 mm
Tu x ((1+D/b) /1.7)
0.5
}xbxd
fy
Provide 5 - 36
2.8
49/61
1100 mm
Width of beam
1000 mm
Minimum each side face reinforcement as per IS 456 - 2000 cl. 26.5.1.3(0.05%*b*d)
550 mm
20 mm
314 mm
Number of bars
1.8
336 mm
Vu
Tu
1000 mm
1355 kN
123 kN-m
Ve = Vu+ 1.6*Tu/b
Ve
ve = Ve/(b*d)
ve
1551 kN
2
1.51 N/mm
As
0.99 %
3.52
Design shear strength of section for the provided tensile reinf. at support
0.65 N/mm
sv
100 mm
12 mm
b1
896 mm
d1
960 mm
Asv
163 mm
Asv
196 mm
196 mm
113 mm
1.7
Provide 12
Asv =( (ve-c)*b*Sv)/(0.87*fy)
50/61
DESIGN INPUT
Grade of Concrete
M-25
Grade of Steel
Fe-500
fck
25 N/mm2
fy
500 N/mm2
Clear cover
50 mm
12 mm
Width of column
1000 mm
Depth of column
1000 mm
1354.10 m
1359.10 m
4.10 m
REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
Dia of bars used
32 mm
78 mm
Effective cover
d'
1.29 %
Pu
1935.00 kN
My
2145.00 kN-m
Mz
67.50 kN-m
Corresponding torsion
Tu
12.00 kN-m
My
2145.00 kN-m
Mey
14.12 kN-m
Ley = L
4.10 m
Slenderness ratio
Ley/D
4.10
Mey = (Tu/1.7)*(1+D/b)
Minimum eccentricity
MAX(Ley/500+D/30,20)
ez
41.53 mm
P*ez
My,min
80.37 kN-m
P*D/2000*(Ley/D)^2
May
0.00 kN-m
Muy
2159 kN-m
51/61
Mz
67.50 kN-m
Mez
14.12 kN-m
Lez = L
5.45 m
Slenderness ratio
Lez/b
5.45
Mez = (Tu/1.7)*(1+b/D)
Minimum eccentricity
MAX(Lez/500+b/30,20)
ey
44.23 mm
P*ey
Mz,min
85.59 kN-m
P*b/2000*(Lez/b)^2
Maz
0.00 kN-m
Muz
86 kN-m
d'/D
0.078
p/fck
0.051
0.077
Muy,l/(fckbD )
0.105
Muy,l
2625 kN-m
d'/b
0.078
p/fck
0.051
0.077
Muz,l/(fckDb )
0.100
Muz,l
2500 kN-m
As
12870 mm2
Ac
987130 mm2
Puz
15931 kN
Pu/Puz
0.12
an
1.00
Muy/Muy,l
0.82
Muz/Muz,l
0.03
Pu/(fckbD)
Referring Chart 48 of SP-16
Pu/(fckbD)
Referring Chart 49 of SP-16
(Muy/Muy,l)an+(Muy/Muy,l)an
52/61
fck
25 Mpa
fy
500 Mpa
d'
40 mm
Design Input:
Overall Depth of the Beam
800 mm
600 mm
12 mm
Diameter of Stirrup
Diameter of main Reinforcement bar
25 mm
736 mm
339 kN-m
198 kN-m
198 kN-m
2
638 mm
Design Loads:
(Refer STAAD file for the Loads and Load combinations)
Design Moments
0.5
}xbxd
fy
2
1059 mm
25 mm
2
491 mm
2.2
Mu
339 kN-m
Tu
230 kN-m
Mt
315 kN-m
654 kN-m
Tu x ((1+D/b) /1.7)
0.5
}xbxd
2281 mm
2
1059 mm
25 mm
2
491 mm
fy
Provide 5 - 25
4.6
53/61
800 mm
Width of beam
600 mm
Minimum each side face reinforcement as per IS 456 - 2000 cl. 26.5.1.3(0.05%*b*d)
240 mm
20 mm
314 mm
Number of bars
0.8
366 mm
Vu
203 kN
Tu
230 kN-m
600 mm
Ve = Vu+ 1.6*Tu/b
Ve
ve = Ve/(b*d)
ve
815 kN
2
1.85 N/mm
As
0.56 %
Design shear strength of section for the provided tensile reinf. at support
5.22
2
0.51 N/mm
sv
200 mm
12 mm
b1
496 mm
d1
671 mm
Asv
373 mm
Asv
368 mm
373 mm
113 mm
3.3
Provide 12
Asv =( (ve-c)*b*Sv)/(0.87*fy)
54/61
fck
25 Mpa
fy
500 Mpa
d'
40 mm
800 mm
600 mm
12 mm
Design Input:
Diameter of Stirrup
Diameter of main Reinforcement bar
25 mm
736 mm
308 kN-m
161 kN-m
161 kN-m
2
514 mm
Design Loads:
(Refer STAAD file for the Loads and Load combinations)
Design Moments
0.5
}xbxd
fy
1059 mm
25 mm
491 mm
2.2
Mu
308 kN-m
Tu
125 kN-m
Mt
171 kN-m
478 kN-m
Tu x ((1+D/b) /1.7)
0.5
1614 mm
1059 mm
25 mm
491 mm
3.3
}xbxd
fy
Provide 4 - 25
55/61
Width of beam
600 mm
Minimum each side face reinforcement as per IS 456 - 2000 cl. 26.5.1.3(0.05%*b*d)
240 mm
20 mm
2
314 mm
Number of bars
0.8
366 mm
Vu
203 kN
Tu
125 kN-m
600 mm
535 kN
2
1.21 N/mm
Ve = Vu+ 1.6*Tu/b
Ve
ve = Ve/(b*d)
ve
As
0.44 %
6.52
Design shear strength of section for the provided tensile reinf. at support
2
0.47 N/mm
sv
300 mm
12 mm
b1
496 mm
d1
671 mm
Asv
341 mm2
Asv
308 mm
2
341 mm
2
113 mm
Provide 12
3.0
56/61
fck
25 Mpa
fy
500 Mpa
d'
40 mm
600 mm
400 mm
Diameter of Stirrup
10 mm
20 mm
540 mm
178 kN-m
60 kN-m
=
=
60 kN-m
2
262 mm
518 mm
20 mm
314 mm
1.7
178 kN-m
Design Input:
Design Loads:
(Refer STAAD file for the Loads and Load combinations)
Design Moments
0.5
}xbxd
fy
Provide 4 -
20 dia bars
Mu
Tu
18 kN-m
Mt
26 kN-m
204 kN-m
953 mm
576 mm
20 mm
314 mm
3.0
Tu x ((1+D/b) /1.7)
0.5
}xbxd
fy
Provide 4 - 20
57/61
Vu
Tu
400 mm
112 kN
18 kN-m
Ve = Vu+ 1.6*Tu/b
Ve
ve = Ve/(b*d)
ve
184 kN
2
0.85 N/mm
As
0.44 %
Design shear strength of section for the provided tensile reinf. at support
6.65
2
0.46 N/mm
sv
300 mm
12 mm
b1
300 mm
d1
480 mm
Asv
150 mm
Asv
107 mm
150 mm
113 mm
1.3
Provide 12
Asv =( (ve-c)*b*Sv)/(0.87*fy)
58/61
fck
25 Mpa
fy
500 Mpa
d'
40 mm
600 mm
400 mm
10 mm
Design Input:
Diameter of Stirrup
Diameter of main Reinforcement bar
20 mm
540 mm
110 kN-m
60 kN-m
=
=
60 kN-m
2
262 mm
518 mm
20 mm
314 mm
1.7
110 kN-m
Design Loads:
(Refer STAAD file for the Loads and Load combinations)
Design Moments
0.5
}xbxd
fy
2
Mu
Tu
8 kN-m
Mt
11 kN-m
121 kN-m
545 mm
576 mm
20 mm
314 mm
1.8
Tu x ((1+D/b) /1.7)
0.5
}xbxd
fy
Provide 3 - 20
59/61
Vu
Tu
31 kN
8 kN-m
400 mm
Ve = Vu+ 1.6*Tu/b
Ve
ve = Ve/(b*d)
ve
61 kN
2
0.28 N/mm
As
0.44 %
6.65
Design shear strength of section for the provided tensile reinf. at support
0.46 N/mm
sv
300 mm
10 mm
b1
300 mm
d1
480 mm
Asv
54 mm
Asv
-49 mm
54 mm
79 mm
0.7
Provide 10
Asv =( (ve-c)*b*Sv)/(0.87*fy)
60/61
M-25
Grade of Steel
Fe-500
fck
25 N/mm2
fy
500 N/mm2
Clear cover
40 mm
12 mm
Width of column
500 mm
Depth of column
500 mm
1347.77 m
1343.40 m
4.37 m
REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
Dia of bars used
25 mm
65 mm
Effective cover
d'
1.56 %
Pu
366.00 kN
My
132.00 kN-m
Mz
111.00 kN-m
Corresponding torsion
Tu
22.50 kN-m
My
132.00 kN-m
Mey
26.47 kN-m
Ley = L
4.37 m
Slenderness ratio
Ley/D
8.74
Mey = (Tu/1.7)*(1+D/b)
Minimum eccentricity
MAX(Ley/500+D/30,20)
ez
P*ez
My,min
9.30 kN-m
P*D/2000*(Ley/D)^2
May
0.00 kN-m
Muy
158 kN-m
25.41 mm
61/61
Mez = (Tu/1.7)*(1+b/D)
Mz
111.00 kN-m
Mez
26.47 kN-m
Lez = L
4.37 m
Lez/b
8.74
Minimum eccentricity
MAX(Lez/500+b/30,20)
ey
34.15 mm
P*ey
Mz,min
12.50 kN-m
P*b/2000*(Lez/b)^2
Maz
0.00 kN-m
Muz
137 kN-m
d'/D
0.129
p/fck
0.062
0.059
Muy,l/(fckbD )
0.100
Muy,l
d'/b
0.129
p/fck
0.062
0.059
Muz,l/(fckDb )
0.100
Muz,l
As
3900 mm2
Ac
246100 mm2
Puz
4231 kN
Pu/Puz
0.09
an
1.00
Muy/Muy,l
0.51
0.44
Pu/(fckbD)
2
313 kN-m
Pu/(fckbD)
2
313 kN-m
Muz/Muz,l
an
an
(Muy/Muy,l) +(Muy/Muy,l)