Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A- OBJECTIVE
ELECTORAL PROFILE.
IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS.
IDENTIFICATION OF 10 % POLLING STATIONS
WITH LOWEST TURNOUT FOR FOCUSSED
INTERVENTION OF SVEEP ACTIVITIES.
ANALYSING REASONS FOR GAPS.
PARTICULARS.
TOTAL GEOGRAPHICAL AREA
AREA UNDER FORESTS
AREA UNDER AGRICULTURE & ALLIED ACTIVITIES
AREA UNDER OTHER USES (INFRASTRUC -TURE
& URBAN DEVELOPMENT)
OTHER REVENUE LAND / FALLOW/WASTE LAND.
No of Division
No of Districts
No of Tehsils
No of Sub Tehsils
No of Development Blocks
No of Villages
No of Municipal Corporations
No of Municipalities.
No of Town Areas
No of Cantonment Board
No of Panchayat of villages
Total Census Population(2011)
18.
19.
20.
Density of Population
Total Literacy
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Election
Lok Sabha-2009
Assembly-2012
No.
53483 Sq KM
34651 Sq KM (65%)
13.37 Lakh Ha. (23.6 %)
2.17 Lakh Hac. (3.8 %)
6.33 Lakh Hac (11.1 %)
02
13
78
06
95
16826
06
32
28
09
7982
10116752
Male= 5154178 (50.94%)
Female= 4962574 (49.05%)
19.17%
Urban= 39.9%
Rural= 11.59%
189
79.63
Male literacy = 88.33
Female literacy = 70.70
253950 (2.51%)
6155875
Male = 3158480
Female = 2997395
3960877
6786394
Male= 3562722
Female= 3223672
162276 (2.40%)
6624118 (97.60%)
Total= 63.40
Male= 65.40
Female= 61.40
100%
10062 / 7549
Male
Female Total
56.67
51.11 53.96
65.74
68.84 67.22
Nam
e Of
Distr
ict
TEHRI GARHWAL
RUDRA
PRAYA
G
CHAMOLI
UTTARKA
SHI
Assembly Constituency
No
3
PUROLA (SC)
YAMUNOTRI
GANGOTRI
Male
Female
Total
55055
53122
Female
Total
Cens
us
Gen
der
Ratio
10
Elect
or
Gen
der
Ratio
11
GAP
108177
7
32389
8
29846
9
62235
965
921
12
43
31378
64702
1023
942
82
904
959
927
930
23
53223
54468
107691
33324
69725
178003
63051
170641
132776
348644
38547
35732
74279
104260
96956
201216
43765
91104
BADRINATH
74608
68985
143593
47339
925
925
29
0
THARALI (SC)
68471
73560
142031
47510
45338
92848
1074
954
120
KARANPRAYAG
61611
204690
66373
208918
127984
413608
42809
41749
84558
130852
268510
975
951
102
137658
1077
1021
57201
63101
120302
37344
38518
75862
1103
1031
44544
88749
1008
1019
district total
district total
7
8
KEDARNATH
RUDRAPRAYAG
60962
118163
69213
132314
130175
250477
44205
81549
83062
164611
1135
1120
70
72
128
GHANSALI (SC)
53223
67410
120633
42794
41757
84551
1267
976
101
291
10
DEOPRAYAG
45948
53777
99725
37575
37041
74616
1170
986
185
11
NARENDRANAGAR
53853
55299
109152
41319
37100
78419
1027
898
129
12
PRATAPNAGAR
46451
53880
100331
38829
37395
76224
1160
963
197
13
TEHRI
62729
55637
118366
38813
36370
75183
887
937
-50
14
DHANOLTI
51437
313641
52222
338225
103659
651866
37109
34277
71386
223940
460379
924
947
92
236439
1015
1078
86614
79635
166249
51227
42121
93348
919
822
131
97
46563
100303
912
866
45
district total
district total
CHAKRATA (ST)
16
VIKASNAGAR
85009
77503
162512
53740
17
SAHASPUR
86437
89430
175867
66308
59261
125569
1035
894
131
18
DHARAMPUR
97474
85171
182645
76780
64261
141041
874
837
37
19
RAIPUR
88029
81083
169112
70252
62431
132683
921
889
32
20
98421
93689
192110
55807
49525
105332
952
887
64
194108
58834
50780
109614
835
863
-28
186449
57824
51838
109662
902
896
21
DEHRADUN
Name
2
1
15
HARIDWAR
22
23
24
DEHRADUN CANT
MUSSOORIE
DOIWWALA
RISHIKESH
105785
98042
85387
88323
88407
78952
164339
62514
56819
119333
925
909
16
68847
61034
129881
887
875
-97
113332
944530
89516
851709
202848
1796239
622133
544633
1166766
790
902
25
HARIDWAR
97587
85813
183400
72186
57222
129408
879
793
26
87
26
BHEL RANIPUR
98996
87056
186052
67597
57211
124808
879
846
33
27
JWALAPUR (SC)
100627
88486
189113
52645
43712
96357
879
830
49
28
BHAGWANPUR (SC)
99758
87723
187481
57329
47090
104419
879
821
58
29
JHABRERA (SC)
97591
85818
183409
54928
45283
100211
879
824
55
30
PIRANKALIYAR
90326
79428
169754
53314
44744
98058
879
839
40
31
ROORKEE
97590
85818
183408
54718
47483
102201
879
868
12
32
KHANPUR
113856
100024
213880
65733
54970
120703
879
836
42
district total
No
Name
Male
Female
Total
HARIDWA
R
33
BAGES
HWAR
PITHORAGAR
H
PAURI GARHWAL
Nam
e Of
Distr
ict
Assembly Constituency
34
LAKSAR
35
HARIDWAR RURAL
ALMORA
CHAM
PAWA
T
NAINITAL
99542
87533
Female
Total
Cens
us
Gen
der
Ratio
10
Elect
or
Gen
der
Ratio
11
GAP
187075
7
52809
8
43103
9
95912
879
816
12
63
39021
86146
879
828
51
835
830
45
87397
76855
164252
47125
101059
1084329
88964
953518
190023
2037847
57116
47713
104829
635500
527552
1163052
880
879
38014
79705
36
YAMKESHWAR
51017
57357
108374
41691
1124
912
49
212
37
PAURI (SC)
59297
67144
126441
43363
44557
87920
1132
1028
105
38
SHRINAGAR
65680
71337
137017
49063
47969
97032
1086
978
108
39
CHAUBATAKHAL
53845
66612
120457
42355
43867
86222
1237
1036
201
40
LANSDOWNE
52360
58386
110746
39220
37625
76845
1115
959
56
953
1103
977
982
-23
district total
41
KOTDWAR
62954
345153
60024
380860
122978
726013
47186
46090
93276
262878
258122
521000
42
DHARCHULA
60021
59605
119626
38470
38777
77247
993
1008
122
-15
43
DIDIHAT
56975
61056
118031
36014
38667
74681
1072
1074
-2
44
PITHORAGARH
71796
68588
140384
45695
47202
92897
955
1033
-78
45
GANGOLIHAT (SC)
65441
254233
70457
259706
135898
513939
47135
44564
91699
169210
336524
945
1011
131
167314
1077
1022
61163
68164
129327
44365
43724
88089
1114
986
50928
103611
967
975
district total
district total
46
47
KAPKOT
BAGESHWWAR
district total
48
UDHAMSINGH
NAGAR
MANGLOR
DWARAHAT
75370
143534
145456
274783
97048
94652
191700
1075
1094
47878
60972
108850
42207
44850
87057
1273
1063
118
211
45044
90667
1166
987
178
37157
75745
1049
963
86
49
SALT
44960
52413
97373
50
RANIKHET
54693
57360
112053
38588
SOMESHWAR (SC)
52
ALMORA
53
JAGESHWAR
district total
54
LOHAGHAT
55
CHAMPAWAT
109
70086
131249
52683
45623
51
10
129
44868
55536
100404
40526
39008
79534
1238
963
275
39463
81869
1014
931
84
906
968
268
64706
65630
130336
42406
49993
307098
58690
350601
108683
657699
45029
40781
85810
254379
246303
500682
1174
1142
45749
96087
1035
909
905
907
70458
72889
143347
50338
67941
138399
62942
135831
130883
274230
42343
38327
80670
92681
84076
176757
926
981
45958
98456
173
126
21
56
LALKUWAN
77020
66255
143275
52498
860
875
74
-15
57
BHIMTAL
82710
80009
162719
48999
41674
90673
967
851
117
58
NAINITAL (SC)
91489
88834
180323
53361
46784
100145
971
877
94
59
HALDWANI
116045
105412
221457
67889
58615
126504
908
863
45
60
KALADHUNGI
74036
70259
144295
67135
61960
129095
949
923
26
61
RAMNAGAR
81195
522495
76793
487562
157988
1010057
51497
45905
97402
300896
642275
891
881
54
341379
946
933
district total
62
JASPUR
105264
96268
201532
58003
48791
106794
915
841
52
73
63
KASHIPUR
109261
100024
209285
67596
59355
126951
915
878
37
64
BAZPUR (SC)
111624
102443
214067
63542
54945
118487
918
865
53
65
GADARPUR
103813
95016
198829
58032
51142
109174
915
881
34
66
RUDRAPUR
105899
96517
202416
73895
62818
136713
911
850
61
67
KICHHA
96092
88000
184092
56371
47749
104120
916
847
69
district total
Nam
e Of
Distr
ict
Assembly Constituency
No
Name
Male
Female
Total
68
SITARGANJ
69
NANAKMATA (ST)
70
KHATIMA
district total
94456
86831
Female
Total
Cens
us
Gen
der
Ratio
10
Elect
or
Gen
der
Ratio
11
GAP
181287
7
52265
8
45304
9
97569
919
867
12
52
46958
97871
932
922
10
948
875
-12
905
58
91188
84994
176182
50913
90644
908241
84825
834918
175469
1743159
48887
46356
95243
529504
463418
992922
936
919
5450224
5248337
10698561
3562722
3223672
6786394
963
mijksDr fooj.k ds vuqlkj tuin peksyh] :nziz;kx] fVgjh x<+oky] ikSM+h x<+oky] ckxs'oj]
vYeksM+k ,oa pEikor esa ernkrkvksa dk Gender gap jkT; ds Gender gap ls vf/kd gSA
ernkrkvksa ds Gender gap ds fuLrkj.k gsrq ;|fi leLr DEO dks funsZf'kr dj fn;k x;k gS
rFkkfi mfYyf[kr DEO dks mDr dk ,d vfHk;ku ds :i esa fujkdj.k gsrq funsZf'kr fd;k x;k gSA
mDrkuqlkj ,d fo'ks"k vfHk;ku ds :i esa efgyk ernkrkvkas ds Gap dks de djus ds fy, jkT;
esa LFkkfir 20 gtkj ls vf/kd vkaxuokM+h dsUnzksa@feuh vkaxuokM+h dsUnzksa dks fo'ks"k :i esa iz;ksx esa
yk;k tk jgk gS mn~ns';ksa dh 'kr~&izfr'kr iwfrZ ds fy, lHkh vkaxuokM+h vkSj feuh vkaxuokM+h dsUnzksa
esa efgykvksa dks tkx:d djus ds fy, ,d fo'ks"k izdkj dk iksLVj efgyk l'kfDrdj.k dh i`"B
Hkwfe esa rS;kj dj izdkf'kr vkSj izpkfjr fd;k x;k gS tks fuEu izdkj gS%&
44
mijksDr ds vfrfjDr jkT; esa vf/kd ls vf/kd vgZ ;qokvksa dk uke fuokZpd ukekoyh
esa ntZ djkus ds fy, jkT; esa LFkkfir 10 gtkj ls vf/kd
vkaxuokM+h@ feuh vkaxuokM+h dsUnzks dh rjg
ds :i esa iz;ksx
esa yk;k tk jgk gSA bu lHkh vkaxuokM+h dsUnzksa rFkk feuh vkaxuokM+h dsUnzksa vkSj
price Shops esa
dks
Fair
j[ks x;s gSaA tu tkx:drk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, lHkh
izdkj dk iksLVj Hkh pLik djok;k x;k tks fuEu izdkj gS%&
,d fo'ks"k
Ethical voting
'kr~&izfr'kr vgZ ;qokvksa ,oa efgykvksa dks fuokZpd ukekoyh esa iathd`r fd;s tkus ds
fy, ;qok vkSj efgykvksa dh i`"B Hkwfe esa fo'ks"kdj uo fookfgr efgyk 2 vyx&vyx
fofM;ks Hkh rS;kj fd;s x;s ftUgsa fofHkUu Vhoh pSuyksa ds ek/;e ls izpkfjr fd;k tk
jgk gSA rS;kj fd;s x;s ohfM;ks dh lhMh layXu gSA
Name of district
1. Uttarkashi
2. Chamoli
3. Rudraprayag
4. Tehri Garhwal
5. Dehradun
6. Haridwar
7. Pauri Garhwal
8. Pithoragarh
9. Bageshwar
10. Almora
11. Champawat
12. Nainital
13. Uadhamsingh Nagar
Grand Total-
Total No of Elector
in the draft roll
(Published on
18-10-2013)
196082
260281
159502
453554
1118828
1136023
514612
328398
187966
500392
174701
623549
974316
6628204
EPIC
%
PER
%
100
100
100
100
99.98
99.95
100
100
100
100
100
100
99.93
99.98
100
100
100
100
99.98
99.95
100
100
100
100
100
100
99.89
99.97
Total No of
Elector in Final
roll (Published
on 31-01-2014)
201216
268510
164611
460379
1166766
1163052
521000
336524
191700
500682
176757
642275
992922
6786394
EPIC PER
%
%
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total State Population in numbers (projected up to the year of current revision) [X]
10698561
State Population of 18+ only (in numbers projected to year of current revision) [Y]
6505275
Name of District
X
Y
1
Uttarakashi
348644
203146
X
Y
Chamoli
413608
251621
X
Y
Rudraprayag
250477
152330
X
Y
Tehri Garhwal
651866
396483
Age Cohort
2
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
Projected Census
Population in age
cohort (Projected
upto the year of
current revision)
4
8751
55819
49229
38547
25418
16102
7885
1395
203146
10381
76885
58402
45722
30119
19113
9346
1653
251621
6285
46550
35366
27683
18207
11583
5654
1002
152330
16358
121158
92038
72049
47416
30137
14718
2609
396483
%age of
(2) to 'X'
i.e. total
Populatio
n as per
census
5
2.51
16.01
14.12
11.06
7.29
4.62
2.26
0.40
58.27
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.05
7.28
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.84
2.51
18.58
14.12
11.05
7.27
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.82
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.05
7.27
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.82
Electors as per
currently
proposed Final
electoral roll
w.r.t. 1.1.2014
as qualifying
date
6
6907
57403
47067
36988
25606
17146
8097
2002
201216
7896
78014
65223
47378
33181
22124
11416
3278
268510
4359
45343
41097
28607
20588
14561
7872
2184
164611
13372
118662
115551
84385
56791
40480
23613
7525
460379
%age of
(4) to 'X'
i.e. total
populatio
n as per
voter roll
7
1.98
16.46
13.50
10.61
7.34
4.92
2.32
0.57
57.71
1.91
18.86
15.77
11.45
8.02
5.35
2.76
0.79
64.92
1.74
18.10
16.41
11.42
8.22
5.81
3.14
0.87
65.72
2.05
18.20
17.73
12.95
8.71
6.21
3.62
1.15
70.62
%age of (4)
to 'Y' i.e.
registered
voters vs
eligible
voters
8
3.26
27.06
22.19
17.44
12.07
8.08
3.82
0.94
94.85
3.14
31.00
25.92
18.83
13.19
8.79
4.54
1.30
106.71
2.86
29.77
26.98
18.78
13.52
9.56
5.17
1.43
108.06
3.37
29.93
29.14
21.28
14.32
10.21
5.96
1.90
116.11
Name of District
1
X
Y
Dehradun
1796239
1093426
X
Y
Haridwar
2037847
1240192
Pauri
X
Y
726013
445548
X
Y
Pithoragarh
513939
312658
X
Y
Bageshwar
274783
167124
Age Cohort
2
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
Projected Census
Population in age
cohort (Projected
upto the year of
current revision)
4
45096
334000
253642
198623
131121
83111
40648
7185
1093426
51158
378951
287770
225353
148626
94046
46135
8153
1240192
18219
134931
102505
80242
52789
33570
20387
2905
445548
12899
95538
72568
56813
37426
23748
11611
2055
312658
6897
51071
38797
30371
19982
12705
6203
1098
167124
%age of
(2) to 'X'
i.e. total
Populatio
n as per
census
5
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.06
7.30
4.63
2.26
0.40
60.87
2.51
18.60
14.12
11.06
7.29
4.61
2.26
0.40
60.86
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.05
7.27
4.62
2.81
0.40
61.37
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.05
7.28
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.84
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.05
7.27
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.82
Electors as per
currently
proposed Final
electoral roll
w.r.t. 1.1.2014
as qualifying
date
6
24618
328092
299086
220311
148116
91774
42040
12729
1166766
25833
374921
286680
211829
130395
83567
37511
12316
1163052
11274
131935
125665
91544
67458
51334
30649
11141
521000
9542
94055
76135
60199
44864
30715
15758
5256
336524
5229
52298
45448
33754
24942
17835
9338
2856
191700
%age of
(4) to 'X'
i.e. total
populatio
n as per
voter roll
7
1.37
18.27
16.65
12.27
8.25
5.11
2.34
0.71
64.96
1.27
18.40
14.07
10.39
6.40
4.10
1.84
0.60
57.07
1.55
18.17
17.31
12.61
9.29
7.07
4.22
1.53
71.76
1.86
18.30
14.81
11.71
8.73
5.98
3.07
1.02
65.48
1.90
19.03
16.54
12.28
9.08
6.49
3.40
1.04
69.76
%age of (4)
to 'Y' i.e.
registered
voters vs
eligible
voters
8
2.25
30.01
27.36
20.15
13.55
8.39
3.85
1.16
106.73
2.08
30.23
23.11
17.08
10.51
6.74
3.02
0.99
93.76
2.55
29.88
28.46
20.73
15.28
11.63
6.94
2.52
117.99
3.05
30.08
24.35
19.25
14.35
9.82
5.04
1.68
107.63
3.13
31.29
27.19
20.20
14.92
10.67
5.59
1.71
114.70
Name of District
1
X
Y
Almora
657699
399944
X
Y
Champawat
274230
166849
X
Y
Nainital
1010057
615097
Udhamsinghnagar
X
Y
1743159
1060857
X
Y
STATE TOTAL
10698561
6505275
Age Cohort
2
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Grand Total
Projected Census
Population in age
cohort (Projected
upto the year of
current revision)
4
16500
122227
92857
72685
47789
30419
14837
2630
399944
6881
50980
38721
30318
19985
12667
6199
1098
166849
25351
187800
142627
111682
74084
46668
22845
4040
615097
43760
324116
246148
192749
127199
80473
39442
6970
1060857
268536
1980026
1510670
1182837
780161
494342
245910
42793
6505275
%age of
(2) to 'X'
i.e. total
Populatio
n as per
census
5
2.51
18.58
14.12
11.05
7.27
4.63
2.26
0.40
60.81
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.06
7.29
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.84
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.06
7.33
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.90
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.06
7.30
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.86
2.51
18.51
14.12
11.06
7.29
4.62
2.30
0.40
60.81
Electors as per
currently
proposed Final
electoral roll
w.r.t. 1.1.2014
as qualifying
date
6
9841
137720
119557
87849
63445
47588
26132
8550
500682
5194
48496
44865
33188
22103
14277
6697
1937
176757
15515
199871
160090
117254
77247
46472
20133
5693
642275
22696
333762
246151
181499
111907
61581
27034
8292
992922
162276
2000572
1672615
1234785
826643
539454
266290
83759
6786394
%age of
(4) to 'X'
i.e. total
populatio
n as per
voter roll
7
1.50
20.94
18.18
13.36
9.65
7.24
3.97
1.30
76.13
1.89
17.68
16.36
12.10
8.06
5.21
2.44
0.71
64.46
2.51
18.59
14.12
11.06
7.33
4.62
2.26
0.40
60.90
1.30
19.15
14.12
10.41
6.42
3.53
1.55
0.48
56.96
1.52
18.70
15.63
11.54
7.73
5.04
2.49
0.78
63.43
%age of (4)
to 'Y' i.e.
registered
voters vs
eligible
voters
8
2.46
34.43
29.89
21.96
15.86
11.90
6.53
2.14
125.19
3.11
29.07
26.89
19.89
13.25
8.56
4.01
1.16
105.94
2.52
32.52
26.04
19.08
12.57
7.56
3.28
0.93
104.49
2.14
31.46
23.20
17.11
10.55
5.80
2.55
0.78
93.59
2.49
30.75
25.71
18.98
12.71
8.29
4.09
1.29
104.32
Assembly Constituency
No
1
2
3
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
Name
PUROLA (SC)
YAMUNOTRI
GANGOTRI
GHANSALI (SC)
PRATAPNAGAR
TEHRI
DHANOLTI
CHAKRATA (ST)
VIKASNAGAR
SAHASPUR
RAIPUR
RAJPUR ROAD (SC)
DEHRADUN CANT.
MUSSOORIE
02- Garhwal
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
36
37
38
39
40
41
61
BADRINATH
THARALI (SC)
KARANPRAYAG
KEDARNATH
RUDRAPRAYAG
DEOPRAYAG
NARENDRANAGAR
YAMKESHWAR
PAURI (SC)
SHRINAGAR
CHAUBATAKHAL
LANSDOWNE
KOTDWAR
RAMNAGAR
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
DHARCHULA
DIDIHAT
PITHORAGARH
GANGOLIHAT (SC)
KAPKOT
BAGESHWWAR
DWARAHAT
SALT
RANIKHET
SOMESHWAR (SC)
ALMORA
JAGESHWAR
LOHAGHAT
CHAMPAWAT
Total -
675797
609274
1285071
Total -
47339
47510
42809
37344
44205
37575
41319
41691
43363
49063
42355
39220
47186
51497
612476
38470
36014
45695
47135
44365
52683
42207
45623
38588
40526
42406
45029
50338
42343
43765
45338
41749
38518
44544
37041
37100
38014
44557
47969
43867
37625
46090
45905
592082
38777
38667
47202
44564
43724
50928
44850
45044
37157
39008
39463
40781
45749
38327
91104
92848
84558
75862
88749
74616
78419
79705
87920
97032
86222
76845
93276
97402
1204558
77247
74681
92897
91699
88089
103611
87057
90667
75745
79534
81869
85810
96087
80670
Total -
611422
594241
1205663
56
57
58
59
60
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
LALKUWAN
BHIMTAL
NAINITAL (SC)
HALDWANI
KALADHUNGI
JASPUR
KASHIPUR
BAZPUR (SC)
GADARPUR
RUDRAPUR
KICHHA
SITARGANJ
NANAKMATA (ST)
KHATIMA
05- Haridwar
18
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
DHARAMPUR
DOIWWALA
RISHIKESH
HARIDWAR
BHEL RANIPUR
JWALAPUR (SC)
BHAGWANPUR (SC)
JHABRERA (SC)
PIRANKALIYAR
ROORKEE
KHANPUR
MANGLOR
LAKSAR
HARIDWAR RURAL
Total -
Total -
Grand Total-
52498
48999
53361
67889
67135
58003
67596
63542
58032
73895
56371
52265
50913
48887
45958
41674
46784
58615
61960
48791
59355
54945
51142
62818
47749
45304
46958
46356
98456
90673
100145
126504
129095
106794
126951
118487
109174
136713
104120
97569
97871
95243
819386
718409
1537795
76780
62514
68847
72186
67597
52645
57329
54928
53314
54718
65733
52809
47125
57116
64261
56819
61034
57222
57211
43712
47090
45283
44744
47483
54970
43103
39021
47713
141041
119333
129881
129408
124808
96357
104419
100211
98058
102201
120703
95912
86146
104829
843641
709666
1553307
3562722
3223672
6786394
TEHRI GARHWAL
RUDR
APRAY
AG
CHAMOLI
UTTARKA
SHI
Distric
t
Name
PUROLA (SC)
YAMUNOTRI
GANGOTRI
district total
4
BADRINATH
5
THARALI (SC)
KARANPRAYAG
district total
7
KEDARNATH
8
RUDRAPRAYAG
district total
9
GHANSALI (SC)
10
DEOPRAYAG
11
NARENDRANAGAR
12
PRATAPNAGAR
13
TEHRI
14
DHANOLTI
DEHRADUN
district total
15 CHAKRATA (ST)
16
VIKASNAGAR
17
SAHASPUR
18
DHARAMPUR
19
RAIPUR
20
21
DEHRADUN CANT.
22
MUSSOORIE
23
DOIWWALA
24
RISHIKESH
HARIDWAR
district total
25 HARIDWAR
26
BHEL RANIPUR
27
JWALAPUR (SC)
28
BHAGWANPUR (SC)
29
JHABRERA (SC)
30
PIRANKALIYAR
31
ROORKEE
32
KHANPUR
33
MANGLOR
Rural
0
5
11
16
34
1
17
52
7
5
12
0
3
10
0
23
0
36
3
20
0
106
89
142
124
97
11
61
653
165
86
0
0
9
0
117
12
38
150
139
144
433
161
163
133
457
132
154
286
143
136
143
138
123
150
833
196
106
145
37
72
0
0
45
131
100
832
0
78
139
143
142
133
16
152
90
Total
150
144
155
449
195
164
150
509
139
159
298
143
139
153
138
146
150
869
199
126
145
143
161
142
124
142
142
161
1485
165
164
139
143
151
133
133
164
128
% of
Urban
PS
% of
Rural
PS
voter
turnout
(2012
Assem
bly El.)
Urban
Rural
Total
0
5
11
16
26
1
11
38
5
5
10
0
3
6
0
19
0
28
3
64
0
35
44
59
46
49
18
26
344
57
29
0
0
4
0
44
6
13
150
139
144
433
161
161
133
455
123
152
275
136
128
134
130
121
146
795
190
7
83
25
41
0
0
42
82
47
517
0
42
91
86
90
69
10
92
56
150
100
77.74
144
3.47
96.53
71.24
155
7.10
92.90
70.56
449
3.56
96.44
187
17.44
82.56
72.99
63.97
162
0.61
99.39
59.50
144
11.33
88.67
59.88
493
10.22
89.78
128
5.04
94.96
61.12
64.75
157
3.14
96.86
61.69
285
4.03
95.97
136
0.00
100
63.11
53.53
131
2.16
97.84
56.53
140
6.54
93.46
64.62
130
0.00
100
52.97
140
15.75
84.25
55.94
146
0.00
100
68.23
823
4.14
95.86
193
1.51
98.49
58.52
75.24
71
15.87
84.13
72.50
83
0.00
100
75.16
60
74.13
25.87
62.33
85
55.28
44.72
63.87
59
100
0.00
60.94
46
100
0.00
61.72
91
68.31
31.69
62.67
100
7.75
92.25
70.98
73
37.89
62.11
67.96
861
43.97
56.03
57
100
0.00
67.16
67.74
71
52.44
47.56
68.79
91
0.00
100
77.99
86
0.00
100
79.76
94
5.96
94.04
72.93
69
0.00
100
80.23
54
87.97
12.03
64.36
98
7.32
92.68
79.26
69
29.69
70.31
79.18
Distric
t
Name
34
LAKSAR
35
HARIDWAR RURAL
NAINITAL
CHAM
PAWA
T
ALMORA
BAGES
HWAR
PITHORAGAR
H
PAURIGARHWAL
district total
36 YAMKESHWAR
37
PAURI (SC)
38
SHRINAGAR
39
CHAUBATAKHAL
40
LANSDOWNE
41
KOTDWAR
district total
42 DHARCHULA
43
DIDIHAT
44
PITHORAGARH
45
GANGOLIHAT (SC)
district total
46 KAPKOT
47
BAGESHWWAR
district total
48 DWARAHAT
49
SALT
50
RANIKHET
51
SOMESHWAR (SC)
52
ALMORA
53
JAGESHWAR
district total
54 LOHAGHAT
55
CHAMPAWAT
district total
56 LALKUWAN
57
BHIMTAL
58
NAINITAL (SC)
59
HALDWANI
60
KALADHUNGI
61
RAMNAGAR
UDHAMSINGH
NAGAR
district total
62 JASPUR
63
KASHIPUR
64
BAZPUR (SC)
65
GADARPUR
66
RUDRAPUR
67
KICHHA
68
SITARGANJ
Rural
19
0
446
4
18
14
0
4
24
64
5
4
30
101
148
1142
151
129
125
156
127
74
762
132
115
105
150
39
1
6
7
0
0
12
0
30
0
42
6
16
22
10
5
42
158
7
38
260
46
99
33
31
113
28
21
502
161
156
317
128
131
112
126
98
150
745
157
120
277
106
138
104
0
148
91
587
91
57
115
111
56
98
95
Total
120
148
1588
155
147
139
156
131
98
826
137
119
135
150
541
162
162
324
128
131
124
126
128
150
787
163
136
299
116
143
146
158
155
129
847
137
156
148
142
169
126
116
Urban
Rural
Total
8
0
161
4
16
7
0
2
12
41
3
4
30
70
101
707
144
123
123
154
126
37
707
128
110
81
78
15.83
84.17
voter
turnout
(2012
Assem
bly El.)
82.17
101
0.00
100
80.40
868
28.09
71.91
148
2.58
97.42
75.35
56.12
139
12.24
87.76
53.80
130
10.07
89.93
59.65
154
0.00
100
59.91
128
3.05
96.95
53.05
49
24.49
75.51
72.40
748
7.75
92.25
131
3.65
96.35
58.08
67.10
114
3.36
96.64
63.80
111
22.22
77.78
67.19
141
141
0.00
100
56.96
37
1
4
5
0
0
5
0
16
0
21
6
16
22
5
5
19
45
2
11
87
14
36
12
10
37
9
9
460
155
148
303
124
123
108
125
97
148
725
148
91
239
62
123
100
0
91
62
438
65
39
76
80
35
58
52
497
7.21
92.79
156
0.62
99.38
63.59
61.50
152
3.70
96.30
61.57
308
2.16
97.84
124
0.00
100
61.54
52.16
123
0.00
100
51.99
113
9.68
90.32
53.30
125
0.00
100
58.02
113
23.44
76.56
60.49
148
0.00
100
57.20
746
5.34
94.66
154
3.68
96.32
55.42
56.48
107
11.76
88.24
66.20
261
7.36
92.64
67
8.62
91.38
60.89
75.37
128
3.50
96.50
66.04
119
28.77
71.23
54.75
45
100
0.00
70.29
93
4.52
95.48
69.96
73
29.46
70.54
71.45
525
30.70
69.30
79
33.58
66.42
68.07
77.43
75
63.46
36.54
68.97
88
22.30
77.70
76.84
90
21.83
78.17
82.55
72
66.86
33.14
78.48
67
22.22
77.78
76.50
61
18.10
81.90
80.24
% of
Urban
PS
% of
Rural
PS
Distric
t
Name
69
NANAKMATA (ST)
70
KHATIMA
district total
STATE TOTAL-
Rural
0
12
383
2032
125
109
857
8030
Total
125
121
1240
10062
Urban
Rural
Total
0
4
131
941
81
68
554
6608
81
0.00
100
voter
turnout
(2012
Assem
bly El.)
74.52
72
9.92
90.08
77.05
685
7549
30.89
20.19
69.11
79.81
76.84
67.22
% of
Urban
PS
% of
Rural
PS
Therefore, it can be seen that the gap between urban and rural growth rates is
increasingly tilting towards urban growth. This analysis is important from the voter
registration and voter turnout point of view. It is generally noticed that there is
urban apathy towards both, voter registration and voter turnout. With this
background, it becomes necessary to have SVEEP interventions, which can reach
and be found attractive enough by an increasingly urban voter population.
Name of Districts
1.
Uttarkashi
2.
Chamoli
3.
Rudraprayag
4.
Tehri Garhwal
5.
Dehradun
6.
Haridwar
7.
Pauri Garhwal
8.
Pithoragarh
9.
Bageshwar
10.
Almora
11.
Champawat
12.
Nainital
13.
Uadhamsingh Nagar
14.
Number of Troupes
empanelled
at
with
Department of Sports,
Youth
and
Cultural
Activities.
TOTAL-
No. of Festival/
Celebrations/Fairs Haats to
be held between 25/02/14 to
31/5/14 in districts
04
02
04
03
05
08
12
02
01
01
02
01
01
08
50
15
09
07
44
03
12
15
05
29
05
14
06
168
168
LITERACY RATE
As per census of India 2011, the literacy rate of India is 74.04% with a vast
gap between male and female literacy rates and between rural and urban literacy
rates as well. In rural India, the literacy rate is 68.91% and in urban India, it is
84.98%. Literacy rate in Uttarakhand is somewhat better than the Indian average
with overall literacy rate of 79.63%. However, the rural-urban gap and the malefemale gap exist in Uttarakhand also. Uttarakhand has a literacy rate of 76.30 % in
rural areas and 84.52% in urban areas.
Similarly, rural and urban males (86.06 and 89.10 respectively) have higher literacy
rates as compared to rural and urban females (66.02 and 79.03 respectively).
Therefore, the total literacy rate of Uttarakhand State reflects the male-female divide
very clearly. 88.33% of males are literate in Uttarakhand as against 70.70% females.
The literacy rate certainly has an impact on the democratic participation process.
Therefore, an assessment of literacy rate is necessary to understand what kinds of
interventions for voter education are required in Districts with comparatively low
literacy rates. SVEEP activities in such districts have to be designed in a manner that
they are understood by voters who are illiterate or semi-literate.
District
TOTAL
Males
Females
75.98
89.26
62.23
2.
Chamoli
83.48
94.18
73.20
3.
Rudraprayag
82.09
94.97
70.94
4.
Tehri Garhwal
75.10
89.91
61.77
5.
Dehradun
85.24
90.32
79.61
6.
Haridwar
74.62
82.26
65.96
7.
Pauri Garhwal
82.59
93.18
73.26
8.
Pithoragarh
82.93
93.45
72.97
9.
Bageshwar
80.69
93.20
69.59
81.06
93.57
70.44
10.
Almora
11.
Champawat
80.73
92.65
68.81
12.
Nainital
84.85
91.09
78.21
13.
Uadhamsingh Nagar
74.44
82.48
65.73
79.63
88.33
70.70
TOTAL-
Name of Districts
No. of ACs
1.
Uttarkashi
03
2.
Chamoli
03
3.
Rudraprayag
02
4.
Tehri Garhwal
06
5.
Dehradun
10
6.
Haridwar
11
7.
Pauri Garhwal
06
8.
Pithoragarh
04
9.
Bageshwar
02
10.
Almora
06
11.
Champawat
02
12.
Nainital
06
13.
Uadhamsingh Nagar
09
Total -
70
Names of Excluded
Communities identified
by District for SVEEP
intervention
Total No
Assembly Constituency
No
UTTARKASHI
2
1
2
3
Name
3
PUROLA (SC)
YAMUNOTRI
GANGOTRI
district total
CHAMOLI
4
5
6
BADRINATH
THARALI (SC)
KARANPRAYAG
district total
RUDRAPRAYAG
7
8
KEDARNATH
RUDRAPRAYAG
district total
TEHRI
GARHWAL
9
10
11
12
13
14
GHANSALI (SC)
DEOPRAYAG
NARENDRANAGAR
PRATAPNAGAR
TEHRI
DHANOLTI
district total
DEHRADUN
HARIDWAR
15 CHAKRATA (ST)
16 VIKASNAGAR
17 SAHASPUR
18 DHARAMPUR
19 RAIPUR
20 RAJPUR ROAD (SC)
21 DEHRADUN CANT.
22 MUSSOORIE
23 DOIWWALA
24 RISHIKESH
district total
25 HARIDWAR
26 BHEL RANIPUR
27 JWALAPUR (SC)
28 BHAGWANPUR (SC)
29 JHABRERA (SC)
30 PIRANKALIYAR
31 ROORKEE
32 KHANPUR
33 MANGLOR
34 LAKSAR
35 HARIDWAR RURAL
district total
PAURIGARHWAL
36
37
38
39
40
YAMKESHWAR
PAURI (SC)
SHRINAGAR
CHAUBATAKHAL
LANSDOWNE
EP RATIO
(w.r.t.
01.01.2012
EP RATIO
(w.r.t.
01.01.2013
EP RATIO
(w.r.t.
01.01.2014
FINAL ROLL)
FINAL ROLL)
FINAL ROLL)
DIFR
ENCE
(6-5)
49.87
53.79
59.31
56.86
59.35
55.69
57.53
60.08
55.94
7
0.67
0.73
0.25
54.35
57.19
57.71
0.52
50.81
52.77
54.33
61.56
62.74
64.77
63.45
65.37
66.07
1.89
2.63
1.3
52.57
62.96
64.92
1.96
56.48
60.25
62.36
67.04
63.06
68.18
0.7
1.14
58.44
64.79
65.72
0.93
59.09
64.02
61.70
62.34
56.48
57.40
68.01
73.73
71.88
74.96
63.68
67.78
70.09
74.82
71.84
75.97
63.52
68.87
2.08
1.09
-0.04
1.01
-0.16
1.09
60.07
69.78
70.62
0.84
56.00
62.33
62.22
66.48
72.26
55.97
53.80
56.53
67.61
61.20
55.58
60.65
67.57
71.84
77.03
55.09
55.59
57.70
69.73
62.97
56.15
61.72
71.40
77.22
78.46
54.83
56.47
58.82
72.61
64.03
0.57
1.07
3.83
5.38
1.43
-0.26
0.88
1.12
2.88
1.06
61.25
63.18
64.96
1.78
78.59
72.28
56.72
62.56
61.71
64.52
61.59
61.88
58.38
58.18
60.85
70.88
66.55
50.20
55.32
54.58
57.56
56.28
55.34
51.48
51.90
53.95
70.56
67.08
50.95
55.70
54.64
57.76
55.72
56.43
51.27
52.45
55.17
-0.32
0.53
0.75
0.38
0.06
0.2
-0.56
1.09
-0.21
0.55
1.22
63.38
56.72
57.07
0.35
55.22
51.27
53.30
53.65
51.21
72.82
68.75
69.29
70.71
67.65
73.55
69.53
70.82
71.58
69.39
0.73
0.78
1.53
0.87
1.74
Name Of District
Assembly Constituency
No
2
41
Name
3
KOTDWAR
district total
PITHORAGARH
42
43
44
45
DHARCHULA
DIDIHAT
PITHORAGARH
GANGOLIHAT (SC)
district total
46
47
BAGESHWAR
KAPKOT
BAGESHWWAR
district total
48
49
50
51
52
53
ALMORA
DWARAHAT
SALT
RANIKHET
SOMESHWAR (SC)
ALMORA
JAGESHWAR
district total
54
55
CHAMPAWAT
LOHAGHAT
CHAMPAWAT
district total
56
57
58
59
60
61
NAINITAL
LALKUWAN
BHIMTAL
NAINITAL (SC)
HALDWANI
KALADHUNGI
RAMNAGAR
district total
UDHAMSINGH
NAGAR
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
JASPUR
KASHIPUR
BAZPUR (SC)
GADARPUR
RUDRAPUR
KICHHA
SITARGANJ
NANAKMATA (ST)
KHATIMA
district total
STATE TOTAL-
EP RATIO
(w.r.t.
01.01.2012
EP RATIO
(w.r.t.
01.01.2013
EP RATIO
(w.r.t.
01.01.2014
FINAL ROLL)
FINAL ROLL)
FINAL ROLL)
DIFR
ENCE
(6-5)
53.76
75.12
75.85
7
0.73
53.05
70.70
71.76
1.06
50.14
50.12
49.05
54.34
61.91
61.28
62.63
64.88
64.57
63.27
66.17
67.48
2.66
1.99
3.54
2.6
50.95
62.75
65.48
2.73
56.09
57.62
67.22
70.28
68.11
71.23
0.89
0.95
56.90
68.84
69.76
0.92
61.30
73.91
51.29
59.68
46.20
61.15
79.65
94.73
67.33
77.47
61.92
77.67
79.98
93.11
67.60
79.21
62.81
78.95
0.33
-1.62
0.27
1.74
0.89
1.28
58.20
75.61
76.13
0.52
60.45
54.66
66.15
60.96
67.03
61.64
0.88
0.68
57.69
63.67
64.46
0.79
61.77
54.81
52.83
48.70
75.20
56.62
67.10
55.13
54.78
56.22
84.82
61.16
68.72
55.72
55.54
57.12
89.47
61.65
1.62
0.59
0.76
0.9
4.65
0.49
57.30
62.19
63.59
1.4
54.36
60.62
55.57
57.04
61.35
55.11
55.59
56.53
56.05
52.33
61.47
54.49
55.20
66.77
56.20
53.86
55.05
53.81
52.99
60.66
55.35
54.91
67.54
56.56
53.82
55.55
54.28
0.66
-0.81
0.86
-0.29
0.77
0.36
-0.04
0.5
0.47
56.97
58.18
56.69
62.45
56.96
63.43
0.27
+0.98
Uttarakashi
X
Y
Age Cohort
2
18-19
Projected Census
Population in age
cohort (Projected
upto the year of
current revision)
Electors as per
currently proposed
Final electoral roll
w.r.t. 1.1.2014 as
qualifying date
age cohort
wise Gap
%
of GAP
8751
6907
5
1844
6
21.07
348644
203146
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
55819
49229
38547
25418
16102
7885
1395
203146
10381
57403
47067
36988
25606
17146
8097
2002
201216
7896
-1584
2162
1559
-188
-1044
-212
-607
1930
2485
-2.84
4.39
4.04
-0.74
-6.48
-2.69
-43.51
0.95
23.94
X
Y
413608
251621
X
Y
Rudraprayag
250477
152330
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
76885
58402
45722
30119
19113
9346
1653
251621
6285
46550
35366
27683
18207
11583
5654
1002
152330
16358
78014
65223
47378
33181
22124
11416
3278
268510
4359
45343
41097
28607
20588
14561
7872
2184
164611
13372
-1129
-6821
-1656
-3062
-3011
-2070
-1625
-16889
1926
1207
-5731
-924
-2381
-2978
-2218
-1182
-12281
2986
-1.47
-11.68
-3.62
-10.17
-15.75
-22.15
-98.31
-6.71
30.64
2.59
-16.20
-3.34
-13.08
-25.71
-39.23
-117.96
-8.06
18.25
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
121158
92038
72049
47416
30137
14718
2609
396483
45096
118662
115551
84385
56791
40480
23613
7525
460379
24618
2496
-23513
-12336
-9375
-10343
-8895
-4916
-63896
20478
2.06
-25.55
-17.12
-19.77
-34.32
-60.44
-188.42
-16.12
45.41
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
334000
253642
198623
131121
83111
40648
7185
1093426
328092
299086
220311
148116
91774
42040
12729
1166766
5908
-45444
-21688
-16995
-8663
-1392
-5544
-73340
1.77
-17.92
-10.92
-12.96
-10.42
-3.42
-77.16
-6.71
Chamoli
Tehri Garhwal
X
Y
651866
396483
Dehradun
X
Y
1796239
1093426
age cohort
wise Gap
2
18-19
Electors as per
currently proposed
Final electoral roll
w.r.t. 1.1.2014 as
qualifying date
4
25833
5
25325
6
49.50
2037847
1240192
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
378951
287770
225353
148626
94046
46135
8153
1240192
18219
374921
286680
211829
130395
83567
37511
12316
1163052
11274
4030
1090
13524
18231
10479
8624
-4163
77140
6945
1.06
0.38
6.00
12.27
11.14
18.69
-51.06
6.22
38.12
726013
445548
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
134931
102505
80242
52789
33570
20387
2905
445548
12899
131935
125665
91544
67458
51334
30649
11141
521000
9542
2996
-23160
-11302
-14669
-17764
-10262
-8236
-75452
3357
2.22
-22.59
-14.08
-27.79
-52.92
-50.34
-283.51
-16.93
26.03
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
95538
72568
56813
37426
23748
11611
2055
312658
6897
94055
76135
60199
44864
30715
15758
5256
336524
5229
1483
-3567
-3386
-7438
-6967
-4147
-3201
-23866
1668
1.55
-4.92
-5.96
-19.87
-29.34
-35.72
-155.77
-7.63
24.18
274783
167124
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
51071
38797
30371
19982
12705
6203
1098
167124
16500
52298
45448
33754
24942
17835
9338
2856
191700
9841
-1227
-6651
-3383
-4960
-5130
-3135
-1758
-24576
6659
-2.40
-17.14
-11.14
-24.82
-40.38
-50.54
-160.11
-14.71
40.36
657699
399944
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
122227
92857
72685
47789
30419
14837
2630
399944
137720
119557
87849
63445
47588
26132
8550
500682
-15493
-26700
-15164
-15656
-17169
-11295
-5920
-100738
-12.68
-28.75
-20.86
-32.76
-56.44
-76.13
-225.10
-25.19
1
Haridwar
X
Y
Pauri
X
Y
Pithoragarh
X
Y
513939
312658
Bageshwar
X
Y
Almora
X
Y
Age
Cohort
%
of GAP
Projected Census
Population in age
cohort (Projected
upto the year of
current revision)
3
51158
Name of District
age cohort
wise Gap
2
18-19
Electors as per
currently proposed
Final electoral roll
w.r.t. 1.1.2014 as
qualifying date
4
5194
5
1687
6
24.52
274230
166849
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
50980
38721
30318
19985
12667
6199
1098
166849
25351
48496
44865
33188
22103
14277
6697
1937
176757
15515
2484
-6144
-2870
-2118
-1610
-498
-839
-9908
9836
4.87
-15.87
-9.47
-10.60
-12.71
-8.03
-76.41
-5.94
38.80
1010057
615097
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
187800
142627
111682
74084
46668
22845
4040
615097
43760
199871
160090
117254
77247
46472
20133
5693
642275
22696
-12071
-17463
-5572
-3163
196
2712
-1653
-27178
21064
-6.43
-12.24
-4.99
-4.27
0.42
11.87
-40.92
-4.42
48.14
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Total
18-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
324116
246148
192749
127199
80473
39442
6970
1060857
268536
1980026
1510670
1182837
780161
494342
245910
42793
333762
246151
181499
111907
61581
27034
8292
992922
162276
2000572
1672615
1234785
826643
539454
266290
83759
-9646
-3
11250
15292
18892
12408
-1322
67935
106260
-20546
-161945
-51948
-46482
-45112
-20380
-40966
-2.98
0.00
5.84
12.02
23.48
31.46
-18.97
6.40
39.57
-1.04
-10.72
-4.39
-5.96
-9.13
-8.29
-95.73
State Total
6505275
6786394
-281119
-4.32
1
Champawat
X
Y
Nainital
X
Y
Udhamsinghnagar
X
Y
1743159
1060857
Uttarakhand
X
Y
10698561
6505275
Age
Cohort
%
of GAP
Projected Census
Population in age
cohort (Projected
upto the year of
current revision)
3
6881
Name of District
HARIDWAR
DEHRADUN
TEHRI GARHWAL
RUDRAPR
CHAMOLI
AYAG
UTTARKASHI
Name of
District
Assembly Constituency
No
Name
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
10
11
10.88
12.38
10.91
11.36
7.69
5.05
3.91
5.60
8.13
3.85
5.79
8.72
8.79
14.41
5.61
8.69
11.24
9.65
17.04
11.42
13.75
10.82
10.72
10.79
8.66
9.96
13.39
13.60
12.00
13.03
9.29
5.69
8.88
4.47
10.75
7.31
9.58
20.58
26.42
22.80
23.31
16.88
20.82
18.30
18.73
15.19
21.32
18.46
28.54
17.36
25.58
24.04
21.11
21.04
23.14
26.40
17.55
21.06
14.70
14.55
12.72
12.25
13.46
19.96
19.67
17.14
18.63
11.00
9.02
13.42
9.65
16.85
13.86
16.82
15.63
19.37
16.70
17.23
12.21
13.09
11.14
12.18
11.72
12.64
12.19
18.74
13.02
19.69
14.66
14.74
16.04
16.27
21.31
14.26
17.21
12.60
12.50
11.72
10.35
11.61
16.51
16.42
14.40
15.50
10.08
7.24
11.01
6.89
13.59
10.36
12.92
PUROLA (SC)
77.65
77.84
77.74
66.77
57.26
62.11
YAMUNOTRI
68.11
74.48
71.24
55.73
48.06
51.87
GANGOTRI
66.27
75.13
70.56
55.36
52.33
53.86
70.39
75.74
72.99
59.03
52.44
55.76
district total
4
BADRINATH
62.07
66.02
63.97
54.38
49.14
51.76
THARALI (SC)
56.79
62.26
59.50
51.75
41.44
46.40
KARANPRAYAG
54.60
65.20
59.88
50.69
46.90
48.73
57.91
64.45
61.12
52.31
45.72
48.94
KEDARNATH
61.72
67.69
64.75
53.59
52.51
53.03
RUDRAPRAYAG
52.68
70.59
61.69
48.83
49.27
49.06
56.85
69.24
63.11
51.06
50.79
50.92
district total
district total
9
GHANSALI (SC)
46.35
60.64
53.53
37.63
32.10
34.79
10
DEOPRAYAG
49.95
63.06
56.53
41.15
45.70
43.51
11
NARENDRANAGAR
58.01
71.92
64.62
43.60
46.34
44.93
12
PRATAPNAGAR
44.06
62.22
52.97
38.45
38.19
38.32
13
TEHRI
50.07
62.13
55.94
41.37
41.02
41.20
14
DHANOLTI
65.55
71.09
68.23
54.31
50.05
52.19
district total
52.25
65.04
58.52
42.59
41.91
42.25
15
CHAKRATA (ST)
75.42
75.02
75.24
58.38
48.62
53.93
16
VIKASNAGAR
70.91
74.36
72.50
59.49
56.80
58.24
17
SAHASPUR
73.64
76.87
75.16
59.89
55.81
57.95
18
DHARAMPUR
61.55
63.27
62.33
50.73
48.57
49.74
19
RAIPUR
62.54
65.39
63.87
51.83
50.84
51.37
20
62.60
59.08
60.94
51.81
46.36
49.22
21
DEHRADUN CANT.
61.30
62.18
61.72
52.65
49.93
51.37
22
MUSSOORIE
62.34
63.05
62.67
52.38
49.59
51.06
23
DOIWWALA
69.82
72.28
70.98
56.43
52.32
54.47
24
RISHIKESH
65.70
70.56
67.96
52.10
50.89
51.54
district total
25 HARIDWAR
66.37
67.94
68.06
67.50
67.16
67.74
54.37
54.91
50.92
48.88
52.76
52.24
26
BHEL RANIPUR
71.18
65.97
68.79
61.89
54.97
58.72
27
JWALAPUR (SC)
79.07
76.70
77.99
73.38
67.67
70.75
28
BHAGWANPUR (SC)
80.76
78.55
79.76
71.88
65.13
68.75
29
JHABRERA (SC)
74.49
71.05
72.93
70.02
61.40
66.04
30
PIRANKALIYAR
80.72
79.65
80.23
69.97
62.80
66.64
31
ROORKEE
64.44
64.26
64.36
57.13
50.40
54.00
32
KHANPUR
79.39
79.10
79.26
69.80
62.28
66.34
Distt/Assembly
NAINITAL
CHAMPAWAT
ALMORA
BAGE-
ALMORA SHWAR
PITHORAGARH
PAURIGARHWAL
Name of
District
Assembly Constituency
No
Name
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
10
11
33
MANGLOR
80.29
77.83
79.18
67.25
57.18
62.65
34
LAKSAR
83.59
80.48
82.17
74.19
67.84
71.26
35
HARIDWAR RURAL
13.04
9.40
8.16
9.04
6.53
-0.57
0.25
-2.35
0.75
15.22
3.47
11.75
8.58
12.45
5.78
9.53
3.45
0.44
1.83
4.24
6.84
4.80
-0.06
4.17
2.54
3.73
5.00
15.60
9.81
10.58
10.11
0.45
13.65
11.01
7.76
9.21
20.65
12.63
11.08
13.90
16.53
6.21
15.56
6.11
12.11
23.19
13.31
23.93
20.26
27.23
17.38
22.24
19.41
13.98
16.56
19.77
23.26
16.14
14.45
12.76
15.62
17.30
22.12
29.39
25.40
18.16
21.36
5.35
20.87
19.45
12.27
16.56
16.53
10.91
9.52
11.29
11.41
2.96
8.01
1.98
6.40
19.16
8.43
18.09
14.99
20.11
11.66
16.17
11.64
7.22
9.30
12.48
15.12
10.39
7.17
8.34
8.84
10.51
13.21
22.15
17.26
14.14
15.39
2.81
17.04
15.09
9.91
12.70
81.55
79.03
80.40
73.40
67.95
70.89
district total
76.29
74.22
75.35
67.25
60.31
64.06
36
YAMKESHWAR
52.79
59.71
56.12
46.26
43.18
44.71
37
PAURI (SC)
51.23
56.23
53.80
51.79
50.02
50.84
38
SHRINAGAR
53.38
65.88
59.65
53.13
50.32
51.64
39
CHAUBATAKHAL
46.72
56.75
51.91
49.07
50.64
49.93
40
LANSDOWNE
47.47
58.69
53.05
46.72
46.58
46.65
41
KOTDWAR
68.98
75.90
72.40
53.75
52.71
53.24
district total
53.75
62.39
58.08
50.28
49.08
49.65
42
DHARCHULA
68.59
65.64
67.10
56.83
41.71
49.01
43
DIDIHAT
66.30
61.52
63.80
57.71
41.26
48.81
44
PITHORAGARH
65.38
68.95
67.19
52.93
41.72
47.08
45
GANGOLIHAT (SC)
55.79
58.19
56.96
50.01
40.81
45.31
district total
63.59
63.60
63.59
54.06
41.36
47.43
46
KAPKOT
58.09
64.87
61.50
54.65
45.46
49.87
47
BAGESHWWAR
56.06
67.16
61.57
55.62
53.18
54.35
district total
56.99
66.10
61.54
55.16
49.54
52.23
48
DWARAHAT
46.46
57.41
52.16
42.22
37.64
39.68
49
SALT
44.91
59.07
51.99
38.06
35.81
36.87
50
RANIKHET
48.88
57.92
53.30
44.08
41.78
42.91
51
SOMESHWAR (SC)
51.47
64.68
58.02
51.53
50.22
50.85
52
ALMORA
57.47
63.74
60.49
53.29
50.98
52.15
53
JAGESHWAR
51.86
63.02
57.20
49.32
47.39
48.36
district total
50.09
60.85
55.42
46.36
43.56
44.91
54
LOHAGHAT
50.19
63.35
56.48
45.19
41.24
43.27
55
CHAMPAWAT
62.98
69.77
66.20
47.38
40.39
44.05
district total
56.02
66.25
60.89
46.20
40.85
43.63
56
LALKUWAN
74.48
76.38
75.37
63.90
58.22
61.22
57
BHIMTAL
65.81
66.30
66.04
55.70
44.94
50.64
58
NAINITAL (SC)
55.19
54.24
54.75
54.74
48.89
51.94
59
HALDWANI
70.84
69.65
70.29
57.19
48.78
53.25
60
KALADHUNGI
69.63
70.31
69.96
58.62
50.86
54.86
61
RAMNAGAR
70.45
72.56
71.45
62.68
60.30
61.54
67.86
68.31
68.07
58.65
51.76
55.37
district total
Distt/Assembly
Name of
District
Assembly Constituency
No
Name
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
10
11
13.93
12.24
13.17
10.65
11.80
12.19
11.35
13.31
14.38
22.52
16.70
18.12
15.62
14.85
17.62
15.97
20.10
24.67
17.95
14.32
15.51
13.03
13.22
14.69
13.54
16.62
19.44
12.52
9.07
18.33 15.27
17.73 13.26
62
JASPUR
76.94
78.01
77.43
63.01
55.49
59.48
63
KASHIPUR
70.52
67.19
68.97
58.28
50.49
54.65
64
BAZPUR (SC)
78.08
75.41
76.84
64.91
57.28
61.33
65
GADARPUR
83.14
81.88
82.55
72.49
66.26
69.52
66
RUDRAPUR
78.67
78.27
78.48
66.87
63.42
65.27
67
KICHHA
76.96
75.97
76.50
64.77
58.35
61.81
68
SITARGANJ
81.27
79.07
80.24
69.92
63.10
66.70
69
NANAKMATA (ST)
74.67
74.37
74.52
61.36
54.27
57.91
70
KHATIMA
74.80
79.42
77.05
60.41
54.75
57.61
77.18
76.46
76.84
64.66
58.13
61.57
65.74
68.84
67.22
56.67
51.11
53.96
district total
STATE TOTAL-
mkjk[k.M jkT; esa yksd lHkk lkekU; fuokZpu 2009 dh vis{kk 53-96 izfr'kr fo/kku
lHkk lkekU; fuokZpu 2012 esa 67-22 izfr'kr ernku gqvk tks 13-26 izfr'kr vf/kd
gSA bruk gh ugh cfYd fo/kku lHkk lkekU; fuokZpu 2012 esa efgyk ernku dk
izfr'kr iq:"kksa dh vis{kk 17-73 izfr'kr vf/kd jgk gSA
yksd lHkk lkekU; fuokZpu 2014 esa ernku dk y{; 85&90 izfr'kr j[kk x;k gS vkSj
y{; dh izkfIr gsrq SVEEP ds vUrZxr fofHkUu ek/;eksa ls tSls ,l-,e-,l] uqDdM+ ukVd]
vkWfM;ks&ohfM;ks izlkj.k] iEiysV iksLVj] gSUMfoy vkfn ls ernkrk tkx:drk ds :i
esa O;kid izpkj&izlkj fd;s tkus gsrq lHkh ftyk fuokZpu vf/kdkfj;ksa ,oa fjVfuZax
vkfQljksa dks funsZ'k fuxZr fd;s tk pqds gSA
Assembly Constituency
Name
Male
3
Total
39
CHAUBATAKHAL
46.72
56.75
51.91
49
SALT
44.91
59.07
51.99
48
DWARAHAT
46.46
57.41
52.16
12
PRATAPNAGAR
44.06
62.22
52.97
40
LANSDOWNE
47.47
58.69
53.05
50
RANIKHET
48.88
57.92
53.30
GHANSALI (SC)
46.35
60.64
53.53
37
PAURI (SC)
51.23
56.23
53.80
58
NAINITAL (SC)
55.19
54.24
54.75
13
TEHRI
50.07
62.13
55.94
No
Assembly Constituency
Name
Female
Total
36
YAMKESHWAR
52.79
59.71
56.12
54
LOHAGHAT
50.19
63.35
56.48
10
DEOPRAYAG
49.95
63.06
56.53
45
GANGOLIHAT (SC)
55.79
58.19
56.96
53
JAGESHWAR
51.86
63.02
57.20
51
SOMESHWAR (SC)
51.47
64.68
58.02
THARALI (SC)
56.79
62.26
59.50
38
SHRINAGAR
53.38
65.88
59.65
KARANPRAYAG
54.60
65.20
59.88
52
ALMORA
57.47
63.74
60.49
20
62.60
59.08
60.94
46
KAPKOT
58.09
64.87
61.50
47
BAGESHWWAR
56.06
67.16
61.57
RUDRAPRAYAG
52.68
70.59
61.69
21
DEHRADUN CANT.
61.30
62.18
61.72
18
DHARAMPUR
61.55
63.27
62.33
22
MUSSOORIE
62.34
63.05
62.67
43
DIDIHAT
66.30
61.52
63.80
19
RAIPUR
62.54
65.39
63.87
BADRINATH
62.07
66.02
63.97
31
ROORKEE
64.44
64.26
64.36
11
NARENDRANAGAR
58.01
71.92
64.62
KEDARNATH
61.72
67.69
64.75
57
BHIMTAL
65.81
66.30
66.04
55
CHAMPAWAT
62.98
69.77
66.20
mDrkuqlkj fo/kku lHkk lkekU; fuokZpu&2012 esa dqy 70 fo/kku lHkk fuokZpu {ks=ksa ds
lkis{k 35 fo/kku lHkk fuokZpu {ks=ksa esa ernku dk izfr'kr jkT; vkSlr ls de
jgkA bu lHkh fo/kku lHkk fuokZpu {ks=ksa esa yksd lHkk lkekU; fuokZpu&2014 esa
fu/kkZfjr y{; ds vuq:i ernku dk izfr'kr lqfuf'pr fd, tkus ds fy, fo'ks"k :i ls
dk;Zokgh fd, tkus gsrq lacaf/kr ftyk fuokZpu vf/kdkfj;ksa dks fo'ks"k funsZ'k fuxZr fd,
tk pqds gSaA
Name
Male
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Female
Total
65
GADARPUR
83.14
81.88
82.55
34
LAKSAR
83.59
80.48
82.17
35
HARIDWAR RURAL
81.55
79.03
80.40
68
SITARGANJ
81.27
79.07
80.24
30
PIRANKALIYAR
80.72
79.65
80.23
28
BHAGWANPUR (SC)
80.76
78.55
79.76
32
KHANPUR
79.39
79.10
79.26
33
MANGLOR
80.29
77.83
79.18
66
RUDRAPUR
78.67
78.27
78.48
27
JWALAPUR (SC)
79.07
76.70
77.99
PUROLA (SC)
77.65
77.84
77.74
62
JASPUR
76.94
78.01
77.43
70
KHATIMA
74.80
79.42
77.05
64
BAZPUR (SC)
78.08
75.41
76.84
67
KICHHA
76.96
75.97
76.50
56
LALKUWAN
74.48
76.38
75.37
15
CHAKRATA (ST)
75.42
75.02
75.24
17
SAHASPUR
73.64
76.87
75.16
69
NANAKMATA (ST)
74.67
74.37
74.52
29
JHABRERA (SC)
74.49
71.05
72.93
16
VIKASNAGAR
70.91
74.36
72.50
41
KOTDWAR
68.98
75.90
72.40
61
RAMNAGAR
70.45
72.56
71.45
YAMUNOTRI
68.11
74.48
71.24
23
DOIWWALA
69.82
72.28
70.98
GANGOTRI
66.27
75.13
70.56
59
HALDWANI
70.84
69.65
70.29
60
KALADHUNGI
69.63
70.31
69.96
63
KASHIPUR
70.52
67.19
68.97
26
BHEL RANIPUR
71.18
65.97
68.79
14
DHANOLTI
65.55
71.09
68.23
24
RISHIKESH
65.70
70.56
67.96
25
HARIDWAR
67.94
67.50
67.74
fo/kku lHkk lkekU; fuokZpu&2012 esa jkT; dh 70 fo/kku lHkk fuokZpu {ks=ksa ds lkis{k dqy&33
fo/kku lHkk fuokZpu {ks=ksa esa ernku dk izfr'kr jkT; ds vkSlr 67-22izfr'kr ls vf/kd jgkA yksd
lHkk lkekU; fuokZpu&2014 esa Hkh bu lHkh fo/kku lHkk fuokZpu {ks=ksa esa fu/kkZfjr y{; ls vf/kd
Turnout dh lEHkkouk gSA
Ac. No.
1-District UTTARKASHI:-
No
Name
TURNOUT
Male
Female
Other
Total
34.35
22.96
0.00
28.71
42.52
29.05
0.00
36.26
46.89
27.54
0.00
39.06
78
38.74
43.70
0.00
41.15
45.59
40.00
0.00
43.36
84
42.68
47.48
0.00
45.04
152
34.18
59.87
0.00
46.77
38.56
57.14
0.00
48.05
42.31
62.90
0.00
51.43
38.36
64.81
0.00
51.71
88
140
5
5
4
6
6
5
6
5
5
125
116
53
25
87
79
6
80
67
24 tks'kheB
efgyk
0.00
35.75
51.88
39.68
38.83
46.43
41.11
47.01
43.69
46.64
0.00
45.48
31.20
49.10
49.57
42.57
48.40
44.87
48.74
46.63
;ksx
0.00
40.73
41.86
43.71
44.33
44.48
44.72
45.93
46.17
46.63
ernku dk izfr'kr
iq#"k
efgyk
;ksx
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.98
11.27
11.60
11.98
11.27
11.60
fo/kku lHkk
fuokZpu {ks(
7
ernku dk izfr'kr
iq#"k
efgyk
;ksx
47.17
47.90
47.55
47.17
47.90
47.55
45.56
51.88
48.63
45.56
51.88
48.63
33.94
62.79
49.58
33.94
62.79
49.58
iq:k
ernku dk izfrkr
efgyk
0.00
26.02
27.31
28.36
25.38
31.03
29.90
26.37
33.78
36.16
0.00
37.45
40.09
40.70
48.07
42.86
43.63
48.63
40.58
39.34
;ksx
0.00
31.70
33.56
34.22
36.02
36.65
36.76
36.95
37.06
37.74
23 71v
15 28
24 129
21 81
23 18
21 75
22 74
22 84
21 41
22 75
ernku dk fr'kr
iq:"k
efgyk
;ksx
8.33
6.57
7.41
jk-izk-fo|ky; mnkok
20.29
15.38
17.91
0 0 0 00 1 ()
22.58
22.13
22.36
20.00
40.00
28.00
jk0izk0fo|ky;
35.00
25.37
29.92
31.58
33.16
32.36
34.41
31.38
33.49
41.83
27.76
35.90
39.48
36.44
38.05
40.73
37.50
39.46
6-District HARIDWAR:fo-l-fu{ks= dh
la[;k
erns; LFky dh la[;k ,oa uke erns; LFky ds Hkou ds uke lfgr iwjk uke
ernku dk izfr'kr
iq:"k
efgyk
;ksx
25
10.42
48.15
16.25
25
20.76
45.83
27.38
25
29.91
37.78
32.91
25
34.17
49.04
41.11
25
41.3
45.96
43.22
41.27
46.77
43.84
48.02
41.54
45.09
38.65
53.41
45.42
45.59
45.3
45.45
47.04
44.85
46.54
25
25
25
25
25
Name
Voter Turnout %
Men
G.P.S. Latibau
G.P.S. Ritholi
G.P.S. Bhattkot
G.P.S. Kafldi
J.I.C.Ramadang Kandarpani
G.P.S. Kyard Talla
G.P.S. Buransi
G.P.S. Kandaikhal
G.P.S. Saindhaar
G.P.S. Bhalgaun
Women
0.00
26.15
34.21
30.42
36.02
34.41
37.20
38.33
38.32
37.90
Other
0.00
30.00
37.31
42.92
38.33
41.38
39.60
39.67
40.41
42.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
0.00
28.28
35.89
36.38
37.18
38.28
38.34
39.00
39.36
40.00
8-District PITHORAGARH:fo0l0fu0
{ks= dh
la[;k
erns; LFky dh la[;k o uke erns; LFky ds Hkou ds uke lfgr iwjk
uke
ernku dk izfr'kr
iq:"k
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
1061055450414219993053-
jk0tw0gk0 f'kfyafx;k
jk0izk0fo0 rksyh
fodkl [k.M dk;kZy;] fo.k iw0ik0
jk0izk0fo0 fry<qxjh
jk0d0b0dk0fiFkkSjkx<+ iw0ik0&2
jk0d0b0dk0fiFkkSjkx<+ i0ik0
jk0izk0fo0 pekyh i0ik0
jk0izk0fo0 lYyk
jk0b0dk0 fiFkkSjkx<+
jk0izk0ik0 fry<qxjh
efgyk
0.65
49.71
40.00
52.19
50.27
55.01
61.75
56.82
52.98
57.97
0.00
37.57
59.69
54.49
58.77
55.43
53.15
57.77
61.88
58.33
;ksx
0.34
43.64
48.74
53.27
54.45
55.23
57.04
57.29
57.66
58.15
Polling Station
No.
46
46
46
47
47
46
46
47
47
46
47
Name
Total No.
of Electors
206
75
Wome
n
68
100
101
100
556
395
368
0
0
0
428
Percentage
Men
Total
143
69.42
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
705
24
20
44
6.24
610
95
84
179
29.34
914
194
183
377
41.25
274
48
81
129
47.08
178
724
34
158
51
193
85
351
47.75
48.48
10-District ALMORA:AC
No.
ernku dk izfr'kr
iq:"k
77 QY}kM+h eqlukSyk
48
51
50
78 c;syk
48
13
126
17
73
22
99
50
49
50
50
50
49
efgyk
;ksx
26.63
31.05
29.08
28.28
34.46
31.4
30.9
36.7
33.94
27.33
42.11
34.69
28.77
41.22
35.11
26.32
45.11
35.71
28.16
44.16
36.19
28.09
44.94
36.52
erns; LFky dh la[;k ,oa uke erns; LFky ds Hkou ds uke lfgr
iwjk uke
jk0izzk0fo0 fcuokyxkWo
16 jk0izzk0fo0 jed
60 jk0izk0fo0 ceuxWko
32 jk0izzk0fo0 pkSMkxWwB
29 jk0izzk0fo0 euVk.Ms
32 jk0izk0fo0 rykM+h fiukuk
40 jk0izk0fo0 mnkyh
36 jk0izzk0fo0 iqukSyh
27 jk0izk0fo0 Vak.k
100 jk0m0ek0fo0 yqokdksV
20
ernku dk izfr'kr
iq:"k
efgyk
;ksx
33.18
36.57
34.68
35.97
46.02
40.48
35.64
46.48
40.57
39.43
47.85
43.42
36.06
52.91
44.08
35.11
55.75
44.67
50.00
40.00
45.14
36.69
55.41
45.43
37.33
56.00
45.82
42.26
49.68
45.85
58
120
1
28
94
68
78
88
83
86
58
59
57
58
58
58
58
58
58
jk0izk0fo0 cksgjkxkao
31.58
35.19
33.33
33.71
33.93
33.81
37.65
30.93
34.69
40.08
32.54
36.56
40.93
41.00
31.99
34.46
36.74
38.05
40.83
34.85
38.36
42.02
34.92
38.60
46.22
31.22
39.00
PS NO
Poll %
PS Name
Male
Female
Other
Total
104
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
64
118
30.68
37.80
0.00
32.52
66
20.32
59.24
0.00
35.57
67
20.32
59.24
0.00
35.57
62
136
jk0izk0fo0gfj;kokyk d0u0&2
33.79
39.47
0.00
35.75
66
28.19
54.89
0.00
39.26
28.19
54.89
0.00
39.26
64
34
67.55
36.00
0.00
49.94
65
116
jk0izk0fo0 ds'kksokyk
52.37
52.25
0.00
52.32
69
72
49.03
56.34
0.00
52.62
63
67
EP ratio enrolment
gap
2-
Gender ratio
enrolment gap
3-
4-
Excluded
communities gap in
enrolment and
turnout
EPIC
567-
8-
Gap found in
PER
Female voter turnout
gap
Male voter turnout
gap
In the month of February 2013, while reviewing with the CEOs, the ECI
expressed need to conduct survey on registration to help plan and implement
interventions ahead of summary revision w.r.t. 1.1.2014. However, as
Parliamentary Elections are due in 2014 focus of the election management
machinery is obviously going towards enhancing voters turnout as well. These
two things set basis for the conduct of Baseline Survey of Knowledge,
Attitude, Behaviour, Belief and Practices (KABBP) of Electors.
The Commission vide its letter No. 447/SVEEP/3/2013 dated 18th March 2013
directed for conduct of KABBP in the state and forwarded copy of the sample
questionnaire to be used and improved during the survey vide its letter of even
No. dated 5th April 2013. Further, vide its letter of even No. dated 25 th April
2013, the Commission sought information about the surveying agency.
The Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES) under Department of
Planning has been an obvious choice of the CEO because of three genuine
reasons (i) it has been an associate of the o/o CEO during SVEEP-I for
conduct of Voters Behaviour Surveys, (ii) it has been declared as the Nodal
Agency for all statistical activities (including surveys) in the state vide GO No.
07/ XXVI/ two (16)/2008 dated 13 December 2009 issued by the Department
of Planning, and (iii) there would have been delays in selecting an outsourcing
agency due to procurement procedures of the state government. Further, DES
is specialized in conducting socio-economic surveys and specialized surveys.
It participates in various Rounds of the National Sample Surveys (NSS) and
Annual Surveys of Industries (ASI) conducted by the Ministry of Statistics and
Programme Implementation (MOSPI).
The CEO wrote to the Principal Secretary, Planning vide her letter No.
244/XXV-26(Part-II)/2010 dated 26 April 2013 to issue necessary instructions
to the Director, DES for conduct of KABBP survey and communicated on the
same day to the Commission about selection of DES as survey agency in
order to sought approval. The DES got approval of the CEO vide her letter No.
266/XXV-26(Part-II)/2010 dated 08 May 2013 on the proposal which it
submitted vide letter No. 250/Election Survey (4)/1/2013-14 dated 07 May
2013.
The Commission vide its letter No. 447/SVEEP/3/2013 dated 18th March 2013
has broadly set the objective of the survey as to understand the extent and
level of knowledge, belief, perception, readiness, trends, factors, reasons of
enrolment and non-enrolment of the eligible people and also to assess the
level of participation & reasons thereof. Keeping broader objectives in mind
the KABBP has been conducted in the state in the months of May-June 2013
with five basic objectives as depicted in Figure-3 below.
Figure-3: Objectives of the KABBP Survey
Methodology Adopted
Whereas results of the SVEEP-I in terms of registration and voter turnout rate
are excellent, it appears reasonable to test further the communication strategy
composed of involving government and private media, civil society/ NGOs,
educational institutions, youth organisations mass-media etc and the material
developed. It is required prior to the Parliamentary Elections in order to
effectively communicate with the electors. Thus, the conduct of KABBP survey
has encompassed through various phases of the specialized survey.
(A)
Schedule of Enquiry:
The Commission vide its letter No. 447/SVEEP/3/2013 dated 5th April 2013
forwarded copy of the sample questionnaire (English version) for the survey.
As state functions in Hindi, the DES first initiated internal discussion to
improve and translate the questionnaire. The Hindi version of the
questionnaire (Schedule of Enquiry No. Election 4.0) was forwarded to the
CEO for comments and suggestions and DES initiated conduct of pilot.
Pilot conducted on 21 & 22 May 2013 by the officials of the Directorate before
the commencement of actual survey resulted in language simplifications in
order to make reading easier for the informants/ respondents and also
rearranging of few questions at some places. Though detailed schedule can
be seen at Annexure-A (English & Hindi Version), various sections included in
it are as per Figure-4.
27 Items
15 Items
Block-D: SVEEP
06 Items
Space
(B)
Though DES has been conducting Voters Behaviour Surveys since SVEEP-I
and most of the staff engaged for this purpose are fully apprised of the
objectives of the SVEEP, training was given a special emphasis. A training
programme was organized at the DES, Dehradun on 25 May 2013 for the
field-staff engaged in executing the schedule, supervising the field, and
conducting inspections during the survey. Survey Kit and Field Instructions
were given right at the time of training.
(C)
In order to ensure quality of data various measures have been adopted. Few
of them are listed in Figure-5.
&
to be covered
informants be covered
Informants of
various educational background/ levels even illiterates
Fair representation to
BPL, APL & socio-economically weaker
Households
and
Various Income Groups be covered
Data of the previous Assembly Election (2012) have been used to select the
first stage sample units (Assembly Constituency within a Lok Sabha
Constituency). Picture in Figure-7 describes the sampling procedure
summarily.
Frame:
All (5 in Number)
Lok Sabha
Constituencies
with constituent
Assembly
Constituencies
(14 in each; 70 as
total)
Assembly
Constituencies
within Lok
Sabha
Constituency are
stratified as per
Voter Turnout
Rate in recent
Assembly
Election (2012)
Selection:
One AC with
highest Voter
Turnout Rate
and 3 Acs with
lowest Voter
Turnout Rates
Ultimate
Sample
(Respondent):
25 in each
Selected AC.
They are
selected with
purposive
sampling under
the selection
riders
Thus:
Total Sample
Size is 5x4x25 =
500
i.e. 100 for each
Lok Sabha
Constituency
S. No.
Name of
Parliamentary
(Lok Sabha)
Constituency
No. of
ACs
within
the PC
Tehri Garhwal
14
Garhwal
14
Almora
14
NainitalUdham Singh
Nagar
14
Haridwar
14
Note: Voter Turnout Rates may not telly with Table-3 as those were initial figures.
Extent of Analysis
Data collected from the field i.e. 500 respondents spread in 20 select ACs (4 in
each Parliamentary Constituency) , have been examined thoroughly before
feeding it using the software that is developed in-house in the DES. Various
tables included as Annexure have been produced for facilitating microanalysis. However, macro analysis has been done in this chapter to have a
quick and a crisp analysis of the data. Whereas profile of the respondent/
informants on seven dimensions is prepared using Blocks-A (Chapter-2,
Figure-4) of the schedule, KABBP & SVEEP specific analysis have been done
using Block-B to D.
R ural
U rban
C h a r t-2 : M a le -F e m a le D is tr ib u tio n o f
R e s p o n d e n ts
147, 29%
M a le
353, 71%
F e m a le
C h a r t-3 : A g e -w is e D is tr ib u tio n o f
R e s p o n d e n ts
72, 15%
197, 39%
1 8 -3 5 Ye a r s
3 6 -6 0 Ye a r s
231, 46%
61 & above
C h a r t-4 : E d u c a tio n -w is e P e r c e n ta g e
D is tr ib u tio n o f R e s p o n d e n ts
45
3 9 .0
40
35
30
2 4 .4
25
20
15
10
1 2 .8
1 6 .2
7 .6
5
0
Illit e r a t e
U p t o H ig h
Sch ool
In t e r m e d ia t e
G rad u ate
P o st G r a d u a t e
C h a r t-5 : S o c ia l G r o u p -w is e P e r c e n ta g e
D is tr ib u tio n o f R e s p o n d e n ts
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
6 7 .4
1 7 .6
1 3 .8
1 .2
SC
ST
OBC
G e ne ral
C h a r t-6 : O c c u p a tio n -w is e N u m b e r o f
R e s p o n d e n ts
O the rs
P r iv a t e S e r v ic e
H o u s e W iv e s
S e lf- E m p lo y e d
Te a c h e r s
A dvocate s
M e d ic o
P o lit ic ia n s
N G O W o r ke r
Labore r
C u lt iv a t o r
B u s in e s s m e n
G ove rnm e nt Se rvant
Stude nt
43
27
70
74
23
7
12
13
1
36
39
69
44
42
C h a r t-7 : A P L -B P L C a r d -w is e D is tr ib u tio n o f
R e s p o n d e n ts
79, 16%
19, 4%
A PL
BPL
N o Card
402, 80%
C h a r t -8 : In c o m e G r o u p -w is e N u m b e r o f
R e s p o n d e n ts
5 > L a k h IN R
3 - 5 L a k h IN R
2 - 3 L a k h IN R
20
61
172
< 1 L a k h IN R
247
About 98.8% respondents have said that they are aware about the Voter List;
percentage of those not aware of Voter List is meagre. Out of respondents
who are aware of the Voter List, 96% (474 in Number) confirmed that their
names are included.
C h a r t-9 : P e r c e n ta ge R e s p o n s e s fo r A w a r e n e s s
a b o u t th e Vo te r Lis t
0 .6 0 % 0 .6 0 %
Ye s
No
9 8 .8 0 %
C an 't S ay
C h a r t-1 0 : P e r c e n ta ge R e s p o n s e s f o r In c lu s io n o f
N a m e in th e Vo te r Lis t ( R e s p o n d e n ts - 4 9 4 )
4 .0 5 %
9 5 .9 5 %
Ye s
No
C h a r t-1 1 : P e r ce n ta ge R e s p o n s e s fo r C o r r e c tn e s s
o f N a m e in th e Vo te r Lis t ( R e s p o n d e n ts - 4 7 4 )
1 .6 9 %
0 .2 1 %
Ye s
9 8 .1 0 %
No
C an 't S ay
Further, out of 474 those said that their names are included, 98.1% confirmed
about the correctness of their details in the Voter List. This means that out of
500 respondents around 93% aware respondents said that their names are
included in the Voter List correctly.
Out of aware respondents, 36% said they got information to get registered
from the Teacher/ Govt. Employees, 23% from Friend/ Relatives, 14% from
Local Representatives and 13% from BLOs.
C h a r t-1 2 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r S o u r c e o f
In f o to g e t R e g is te r e d in th e V o te r L is t
( R e s p o n d e n ts - 4 7 4 )
10
C a n 't S a y
1
T V / D o o r d a r sh a n
13
BLO
36
Te a c h e r / G o v t . E m p lo ye e
14
L o c a l P u b lic R e p r e se n t at ive
4
N e w sp a p e r
23
F r o m F r ie n d s & R e la t iv e s
0 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
3 0 .0
3 5 .0
4 0 .0
(B)
Around 90.6% respondents are found having fair knowledge about the eligible/
minimum age for getting registered. However, 8.4% said that they are not
aware; whereas 1% quoted it wrongly.
C h a r t-1 3 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r K n o w le d g e
a b o u t E lig ib ility / M in im u m A g e f o r G e ttin g
R e g is te r e d
1 .0 0 %
0 .0 0 %
8 .4 0 %
1 8 Ye a r s
2 0 Ye a r s
9 0 .6 0 %
2 2 Ye a r s
D o n 't K n o w
However, 88.4% respondent are found not aware about the qualifying date for
summary revision or quoted it wrongly. Those, having knowledge about it are
merely 11.6%.
10.8% respondents (54 in number) said that there are 18+ years of members
of their family those are yet to be registered.
C h a r t-1 5 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s w h e n 1 8 + Y r s
M e m b e r is n o t R e g is te r e d
1 0 .8 0 %
Ye s
No
8 9 .2 0 %
Can't Say
19
Lack of interest
11
Lack of awareness
0.0
5.0
Main reasons stated for non-registration of such members are: cant say
(46.35), not permanent resident (18.5%) and lack of awareness (11.1%).
C h a r t-1 7 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r K n o w le d g e
a b o u t th e P la c e / O f f ic e f o r G e ttin g R e g is te r e d
31
C a n 't S a y
9
V FC
1
D M O ffic e
P a n c h a y a t O ffic e
9
B D O O ffic e
42
Te h sil O ffic e
0 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
3 0 .0
3 5 .0
4 0 .0
4 5 .0
The response about the place/ office to get registered is very dull as people
appeared confused about choices thrown through questionnaire or in their
perception there is hardly any difference between these offices as they keep
contacting them for variety of other works/ reasons or at different time points
these offices do facilitate for registration. However, the response behaviour for
Cant Say (31%) category is meaningful and expresses the extent of
unawareness.
(C)
79% respondents said that they are aware about the local government official/
grass-root functionary/ person is appointed by the government for preparation
and updating Voter List.
C h a r t-1 8 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r A w a r e n e s s
a b o u t A p p o in tm e n t o f L o c a l P e r s o n to p r e p a r e
V o te r L is t
2 1 .0 0 %
7 9 .0 0 %
Ye s
No
C h a r t-1 9 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r
D e s ig n a tio n o f th e L o c a l P e r s o n A p p o in te d f o r
P r e p a r in g V o te r L is t ( R e s p o n d e n ts - 3 9 5 )
41
C a n 't S a y
4
E le c t io n A g e n t
1
Id e n t if ic a t io n O f f ic e r
55
BLO
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
However, out of those 395 respondents about 55.2% could mention his/her
designation (election work related) as BLO and nearly 40.5% said that they
Cant Say. Thus, only 43.6% of total respondents could clearly mention about
the BLO.
C h a r t-2 0 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r V is it o f th e
L o c a l P e r s o n A p p o in te d f o r P r e p a ra tio n o f
V o te r L is t to R e s p o n d e n t's H o u s e / O f f ic e
(R e s p o n d e n ts - 3 9 5 )
1 0 .1 3 %
5 .3 2 %
Ye s
8 4 .5 6 %
No
C a n 't S a y
Awareness about the EPIC is very high. Nearly 99.8% respondents confirmed
having knowledge about it. EPIC has actually emerged as one of the important
identity documents.
C h a r t-2 1 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r A w a r e n e s s
a b o u t E P IC
0 .0 0 %
0 .2 0 %
Ye s
9 9 .8 0 %
No
C a n 't S a y
C h a r t-2 2 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f r o m
R e g is te r e d R e s p o n d e n ts f o r H a v in g E P IC
( R e s p o n d e n ts - 4 9 8 )
6 .8 3 %
Ye s
9 3 .1 7 %
No
Others
Hassle work
Lack of time
Did not get information when it was being
made
12
3
Lost by Department
18
Lost by Self
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
It is to be noted that 5.6% respondent said that they have EPIC but their
names are not in the Voter List.
C h a r t -2 4 : P e r c e n t a g e R e s p o n s e s f o r h a v i n g E P IC
w ith o u t R e g is tra tio n
5 .6 0 %
Ye s
No
9 4 .4 0 %
Those having their names in the Voter List and possessing EPIC (Number
472) are mainly old possessors of the EPIC (75.2%+ 20.6%).
C h a r t-2 5 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s a b o u t
P o s s e s s io n P e r io d o f E P IC f r o m R e s p o n d e n t s
h a v in g E P IC ( R e s p o n d e n t s - 4 7 2 )
21
C a n 't S a y
A ft e r la s t A s s e m b ly E le c t io n s
75
B e fo r e la s t A s s e m b ly E le c t io n s
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
7 0 .0
8 0 .0
65.9% of such respondents said that they got EPIC within one month. Nearly
90.9% confirmed getting EPIC easily.
C h a r t-2 6 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f r o m
R e s p o n d e n t s h a v in g E P IC f o r T im e T a k e n in
G e t t in g E P IC ( R e s p o n d e n t s - 4 7 2 )
14
C a n 't S a y
21
W it h in 6 m o n t h s
47
W it h in 1 m o n t h
18
W it h in 1 5 d a y s
0 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
3 0 .0
3 5 .0
4 0 .0
4 5 .0
5 0 .0
15 respondents those mentioned that they could not get EPIC easily identified
lengthy process (40%) as a reason for it. But, given the awareness of the
electorate and their zeal to get EPIC made, responses from these respondents
appear mere negligence of the facts.
C h a r t-2 8 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f r o m
R e s p o n d e n ts h a v in g E P IC f o r D if f ic u lty R e a s o n s
in G e ttin g E P IC ( R e s p o n d e n ts - 1 5 )
20
C a n 't S a y
In a c c e ssib ilit y / D iffic u lt y in r e a c h in g t h e
C o n c e r n e d O ffic e
20
20
U n c o o p e r a t ive O ffic ia ls
40
L e n g t h y P r o ce ss
0 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
3 0 .0
3 5 .0
4 0 .0
18
A n y o th er Do cu m en t
32
V o t e r S lip
5
Bank A ccount
18
R a t io n C a r d
27
D r iv in g L ic e n se
0 .0
(E)
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
3 0 .0
3 5 .0
It is to be seen that mere 22% respondents are aware about the Voters
Facilitation Centres. There are number of reasons for lack of awareness in this
regard.
C h a r t -3 0 : P e r c e n t a g e R e s p o n s e s f o r K n o w in g
a b o u t t h e V o t e r s ' F a c ilit a t io n C e n t r e
8 .4 0 %
2 2 .0 0 %
Ye s
No
C a n 't S a y
6 9 .6 0 %
C h a r t -3 1 : P e r c e n t a g e R e s p o n s e s f o r A w a r e n e s s
a b o u t t h e S e r v ic e s p r o v id e d b y t h e V o t e r s '
F a c ilit a t io n C e n t r e ( R e s p o n d e n t s - 1 1 0 )
3 0 .9 1 %
Ye s
No
6 9 .0 9 %
However, only 69.1% respondents (76 in Number), who are found aware of
VFC, could mention about the services being provided thereat. This may due
to the fact that many of them did not require visiting (38.2%) the VFCs or they
never visited (35.5%).
C h a r t-3 2 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r V is itin g th e
V o te r s ' F a c ilita tio n C e n tr e ( R e s p o n d e n ts - 1 1 0 )
2 6 .3 6 %
Ye s
3 8 .1 8 %
N o
N ot needed
3 5 .4 5 %
Out of those who visited VFCs (29 in Number) 82.8% expressed satisfaction
about the services being provided thereat.
C h a r t-3 3 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r S a tis f a c tio n
f r o m th e S e r v ic e s o f th e V F C s (R e s p o n d e n ts - 2 9 )
1 7 .2 5 %
Ye s
N o
8 2 .7 5 %
(F)
Nearly 93.8% respondent are found knowing the place/ location of their Polling
Booth/ Station.
C h a r t-3 4 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f o r K n o w in g
h is / h e r P o llin g B o o th
1 0 0 .0
9 3 .8 0
9 0 .0
8 0 .0
7 0 .0
Ye s
6 0 .0
N o
5 0 .0
4 0 .0
3 0 .0
6 .2 0
2 0 .0
1 0 .0
0 .0
Ye s
(G)
No
87.2% respondents said that they participated in the recently held Assembly
Elections (2012) and about 79.4% said that they casted their vote during the
previous Parliamentary Elections held in 2009.
87.20
1 0 0 .0
8 0 .0
6 0 .0
4 0 .0
12.80
2 0 .0
0 .0
Ye s
No
C h a rt-36: P ercen ta ge R e s p o n s e s R e ga rd in g
C a s tin g Vo tes in P a rlia m e n ta ry E le ctio n s - 2009
8 0 .0
7 9 .4 0
6 0 .0
4 0 .0
2 0 .6 0
2 0 .0
0 .0
Ye s
No
38
0
3
Influenced by Friends
2
5
15
15
13
Those who ever casted their vote (453 in Number) rated their voting
experiences as easy/convenient and very good (90.5%) and inconvenient but
good (6.4%).
C h a r t-3 9 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f r o m
R e s p o n d e n ts ( W h o e v e r c a s te d th e ir Vo te )
a b o u t T h e ir Vo tin g E x p e r ie n c e s (R e s p o n d e n t s - 4 5 3 )
C an 't S ay / D o n t R e m e m b e r
D ifficu lt
I n co n v e n ie n t / G o o d
91
Easy / C o n v e n ie n t / V e r y G o o d
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
7 0 .0
8 0 .0
9 0 .0 1 0 0 .0
Their responses regarding police arrangements/ law & order situation are
categorised as yes/sufficient (90.3%) and yes/average (8.6%).
C h a r t-4 0 : P e r ce n ta ge R e s p o n s e s fr o m
R e s p o n d e n ts (W h o e ve r ca s te d th e ir Vo te )
a b o u t P o lice A r ra n ge m e n t/ La w & O r d e r
(R e s p o n d e n t s - 4 5 3 )
C an 't Say
I n su fficie n t
Y e s, A ve r age
90
Y e s, Su fficie n t
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
7 0 .0
8 0 .0
9 0 .0
1 0 0 .0
C h a r t-4 1 : P e r ce n ta ge R e s p o n s e s fr o m
R e s p o n d e n ts (W h o e ve r ca s te d th e ir Vo te )
a b o u t T h e ir E x p e r ie n ce s a t th e P o llin g B o o th
(R e s p o n d e n t s - 4 5 3 )
0
C an 't Say
Be lo w A ve r age
10
A ve r age
38
Good
51
V e ry Good
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
C h a r t-4 2 : P e r ce n ta ge R e s p o n s e s fr o m
R e s p o n d e n ts (W h o e ve r ca s te d th e ir Vo te )
a b o u t C o -o p e ra tio n fr o m P o llin g Sta ff
(R e s p o n d e n t s - 4 5 3 )
9
C an 't Say
U n -co o p e r at ive
A ve r age
41
C o o p e r at ive
46
V e r y C o o p e r at ive
0 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
3 0 .0
3 5 .0
4 0 .0
4 5 .0
5 0 .0
Merely 9.1% of the respondents who ever casted their vote (453 in Number)
said that they faced difficulties in casting votes or at the polling booth.
O t h e r r e aso n s
P r e ssu r e / Th r e at e n in g fr o m B o o t h M an ag e r s o f
P o lit ical P ar t ie s/ C an d id at e s
0
24
Long Q ue ue of V ote rs
L ack o f facilit ie s lik e : d r in k in g
w at e r , lig h t in g , t o ile t , r am p e t c
10
5
N o se p ar at e q u e u e fo r S e n io r C it ize n
N o g u id an ce fr o m t h e Ele ct io n P e r so n n e l
D ifficu lt ie s in g e t t in g V o t e r S lip fr o m t h e V F C
0 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
15.2% respondents mentioned that some of their 18+ years age/ eligible family
members did not cast their votes in previous elections. The main reasons for
non participation of their family members as attributed by such respondents
(72 in Number) are; being away from normal place of residence (27.8%), not
possessing EPIC (27.8%) and non-inclusion of name in the Voter List (25.0%).
C h a r t-4 5 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f r o m
R e s p o n d e n ts W h e th e r A ll E lig ib le M e m b e r s o f
T h e ir F a m ily C a s te d V o te
1 5 .2 0
Ye s
N o
8 4 .8 0
C h a r t-4 6 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s f r o m
R e s p o n d e n ts f o r T h e ir F a m ily M e m b e r N o t
C a s tin g V o te ( R e s p o n d e n ts - 7 2 )
0
O th e r re aso n
D u e t o e le c t io n d u t y
28
W a s a w a y f r o m h is / h e r c o n s t it u e n c y / r e s id e n c e
T h e r e w a s n t a n y g o o d C a n d i d a t e
D id n o t c a s t v o t e a s n o t h in g w o u ld c h a n g e
V o t in g is n o t e s s e n t ia l f o r e s t a b lis h in g D e m o c r a c y
L a c k o f f a it h o n t h e P o lit ic a l S y s t e m ( E le c t e d
0
0
D u e t o f e a r o r f e e l o f in s e c u r it y
N o n e o f t h e C a n d i d a t e w a s f r o m o n e s o w n
0
0
H e a d o f F a m ily s a id n o t t o c a s t v o t e
D id n o t c a s t v o t e o n a p p e a l f r o m c o m m u n it y o r
0
25
N a m e w a s n o t in c lu d e d in V o t e r s ' L is t
V o t e r S lip w a s n o t r e c e iv e d t ill p o llin g d a t e a n d
0
0
L o n g Q u e u e & S h o r t a g e o f T im e
P o llin g B o o t h w a s t o o f a r ( T r a n s p o r t w a s n o t
D id n 't k n o w a b o u t lo c a t io n o f t h e P o llin g B o o t h
28
D i d n t h a v e E P I C
0 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
3 0 .0
C h a r t-4 7 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s a b o u t M o s t
In f lu e n c in g F a c t o r s A f f e c t in g O n e 's V o t in g
A ny othe r
83
S u it a b le c a n d id a t e
R e lig io u s f e e lin g s
C a s t is m
C a n d id a t e p e r s o n a lly k n o w n
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
7 0 .0
8 0 .0
9 0 .0
C h a r t-4 8 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s a b o u t Q u a lity
o f C a n d id a te A f f e c tin g O n e 's C h o ic e
A ny O the r
15
F a it h o n h im
55
H is / H e r H o n e s t y
25
H is / H e r E x p e r ie n c e
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
36% respondents said that candidates suitability is the most influencing factor
for higher voter turnout. Whereas, 14.8% said that it happens because of
accessible and conveniently located polling booths. However, 25% reported
that it may due to usage of muscle and/or money power. But, 11.2% are of the
view that publicity of the polling date and time is also influential.
C h a r t-4 9 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s a b o u t Fa c to r s
C a u s in g H ig h V o te r T u r n o u t
13
O t h e r re aso n s
36
S u it a b ilit y o f C a n d id a t e
11
A d v e r t is e m e n t o f P o llin g D a t e & T im e
A c c e s s ib le / C o n v e n ie n t P o llin g B o o t h
15
B o t h - M o n e y & M u s c le P o w e r
13
1
A f f e c t o f M u s c le P o w e r
11
U sage o f M o n e y P o w e r
0 .0
(H)
5 .0
1 0 .0
1 5 .0
2 0 .0
2 5 .0
3 0 .0
3 5 .0
4 0 .0
70.4%
respondent
said
noted the
election
related
29.60
Yes
70.40
No
Other
18
Tendered Vote
2
3
8
9
33
32
19
18
28
Preparation of EPIC
24
Registration of voters
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
The percentage response (51.4%) for seeing/ noting any actor/ actress/ icon in
the election related advertisements/ campaigns and motivating electors for
participation is atypically very close to its complementary part (Not seeing/
noting).
Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam (18.8%) has been reported as the most influential Icon;
followed by MS Dhoni (13.4%).
C h a r t-5 4 : P e r c e n ta g e R e s p o n s e s o f C h o ic e f o r
M o s t a p p e a lin g A c t o r / A c t r e s s / Ic o n
65
A n y o th er
2
S a in a N e h w a l - B a d m in t o n P la y e r
M ary K o m - B o xer
13
M S D h o n i - C r ic k e t e r
19
D r. A P J A b d u l K a la m - E x - P r e s id e n t
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
7 0 .0
Yo u r V o t e is In v a lu a b le , U s e it W is e ly
20
S a y Ye s t o V o t e , N o t o N o t e
29
M y Vo te, M y Fu tu re
19
S t a n d u p , Yo u a r e 1 8
7
Kn o w yo u r BLO
P r o u d t o b e a V o t e r, R e a d y t o V o t e
0 .0
1 0 .0
2 0 .0
3 0 .0
4 0 .0
5 0 .0
6 0 .0
7 0 .0
mainly
from
the
teachers/
grass-root
government
PE-2009
i.e.
comparative
lower
participation
during
the
taken by the ECI for free & fair election, preparation of EPIC &
registration, separate queue for old, sick and disabled, distribution of
voter slip and info about date & time of election. Therefore, any
communicating strategy being developed be focused for communicating
these items of information appropriately.
Response for seeing/ noting any actor/ actress/ icon in the election
related
advertisements/
campaigns
and
motivating
electors
for
participation are nearly 50%. But, it seems that such atypical response
has emerged possibly because of fading memory of the respondents.
Although not all of the respondents/ electors/ citizen are supposed to
encounter such advertisements, there appears need to suitably place
and time them. Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam and MS Dhoni have been reported
as most influential Icons.
Your vote is invaluable, use it wisely and My vote, my future emerged
as most preferred slogans heard/ viewed by the respondents in election
related advertisements/ campaigns and/ or perceived by them as
meaningful.
BUILDING STRATEGY
FACILITATION .
How To Register.
Where to register.
A set of standard messages appropriate for this election will be required that
will revolve around a catch phrase that can be used for shorter
communications such as stickers, posters and banners. Radio jingle, video
clip etc. These messages need to be prepared in a form that can be widely
used.
Specially woman registration as per gender gap.
information enabling citizens to vote, including the date, time, and place of
voting; Photo Voters Slips.
Ethical voting.
Power of one.
Postal Ballot.
EDC.
SVEEP motivation
the period prior to the announcement
SVEEP FORin
MOTIVATION
of elections:
CEO office has been preparing standardized content for group education. We
are also planning that further detailed information if any, shall be disseminated
from not only our website, but also at Voter Facilitation Centre. (all anganwari /
mini anganwari Kendra & Fair price shops) through Media, through Designated
Officers, BLOs, etc.
Times and Dates of Voter Registration: The dates for summary revision,
the fact of continuous Up-dation will have to be clearly communicated. information
about online and physical locations or places where registration is done.
the manner in which registration is done
how to check the details of that registration
how to correct one's registration if it is wrong
ways in which the voters list protects them against electoral abuse how we deduplicate, etc
where will the proposed deletion and addition lists be exhibited and how to
challenge the lists
where the list will be displayed for voters to check their names.
SANKALP PATRA:
Other activities:
Listing and detailing of all Resident Welfare Associations, all Yuvak Mangak
dal, Mahila Mangal Dal in all urban local bodies falling in Assembly
Constituency for tapping their resources to facilitate voters staying in these
societies.
Urban BLOs held meeting with RWAs Yuvak Mangak dal, Mahila Mangal
Dal, Self help group, Ward member to Register in respect of Electoral Rolls.
Urban BLOs visited all RWAs with the part of relevant electoral roll and find
out missing voters not registered in the roll, enrolled new qualified voters.
BLO held meeting with Fair Price Shop holders and check Ration Card
database for missing eligible persons.
BLO held meeting with Anganwari Kendra / Mini Anganwari Kendra for
missing eligible woman in the roll.
Music and drama productions through our radio partners, NYKS and NSS
and college students.
Polling Station rationalization work was done October, 2014. Several voters will need to be
informed about their new PS locations. Further, this will need to be known to the voters
from an early stage. A variety of methods will be used, such as:
Postal ballots/EDC for service voters (proxy voting also for service voters),
polling personnel, security personnel on duty on poll day;
The provisions for tendered vote, challenged vote and NOTA will also have to
be disseminated to motivate people to exercise their choice unhindered.
conduct
violation
reporting
helpline,
i.e.
1950,
micro-observers,
Candidates:
On the last day of withdrawal the election offices have to communicate the
list of those candidates who are legitimately nominated to run for election.
This list may only be posted on a notice board outside the office of the
Returning officer. It is also given publicity more widely through the press. We
also scan put up each candidates affidavits on our website immediately after
finalization of candidates.
Codes
of Conduct:-
field.
Categories of Information.
Details of BLO
Where to register
Medium of dissemination
Banners,
Posters,
Hoardings,
Pamphlets,
SMS,
Tele-Communication.
Helpline,
At Educational Institutions
through Banners and
Campus Ambassadors
10
Cable TV scrolls
On anganwari/Mini
11
12
On LPG Cylinders
13
On medical prescription
At Government offices
Anganwari Kendra.
15
Ethical voting
16
NOTA
14
Etc.
FACILITATION
Facilitation shall also be linked to Information and Motivation and shall include
among others:
Voter Facilitation Centre (VFC) set up at all Tahsil Headquarters from the 25th
January, 2014.
BLOs camps are being arranged at respective Polling Stations on the Every
Saturday from 10.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m from the month of March 2014 till the
Lok Sabha Election.
Meeting & Workshop of CEO/DEO with Political Parties was held for
informing them regarding preparation of error free roll for forthcoming general
election to house of people and making presentation of the process of
registration of eligible person to make them aware of this process.
Discussing the provisions of law regarding Roll revision in continuous upDation (after final publication) till the last date for making nomination.
DOs are responsible for facilitating the students of the educational institute to
fill-up Form No.6,7,8 and 8A to register their name and to correct their entry in
the electoral roll.
Meeting with Higher Educational Institutions to ensure that all eligible young
voters are enrolled at the time of admission or during studies on or before 15th
March, 2014 in the continuous up-dation of the roll.
Campus Ambassador:
FORM OF FACILITATION
Voter Facilitation centre (VFC)
2-
BLO Camp at PS on every Saturday This practise is started since March 2014.
10.00 am to 2.00 pm from the month It is a facility given for guidance and
3-
of March, 2014
facilitations of voters.
SMS
Voting
appeal,
enrolment
4-
EVM Demo
How to Vote.
5-
6-
7-
8-
Website facilitation
All
departments
of
Government
of
9-
1950 Helpline
TARGETED APPROACH
(TARGETED INTERVENTIONS FOR SPECIFIC IDENTIFIED GAPS)
Youth.
Women.
Tribal voters.
Service Voters.
IMPLEMENTATION
RESOURCE MOBILISATION.
OVERALL APPROACH
TARGETED APPROACH
CONTENT DEVELOPMENT
No. of Persons as
team at District.
Level
No. of Persons
as team at AC
Level
No. of Persons
as team at
each PS Level
1-
Uttarkashi
06
15
02
2-
Chamoli
06
15
02
3-
Rudraprayag
04
10
02
4-
Tehri Garhwal
12
30
02
5-
Dehradun
20
50
02
6-
Haridwar
22
55
02
7-
Pauri Garhwal
12
30
02
8-
Pithoragarh
08
20
02
9-
Bageshwar
04
10
02
10-
Almora
12
30
02
11-
Champawat
04
10
02
12-
Nainital
12
30
02
13-
Udhamsingh Nagar
18
45
02
140
350
10062 X 02=
Total-
20124
Number
01
01
05
07
Name of District
No. of
Personnel to
be trained at
District level
as Master
Trainers
No. of
Personnel
to be
trained at
District/ AC
level by
Master
Trainers
No. of
BLOs to
be
trained
for
SVEEP
Period of
training
1-
Uttarkashi
01
09
449
March, 2014
2-
Chamoli
01
09
509
March, 2014
3-
Rudraprayag
01
06
298
March, 2014
4-
Tehri Garhwal
02
18
869
March, 2014
5-
Dehradun
04
30
1485
March, 2014
6-
Haridwar
04
33
1588
March, 2014
7-
Pauri Garhwal
02
18
826
March, 2014
8-
Pithoragarh
02
12
541
March, 2014
9-
Bageshwar
01
06
324
March, 2014
10-
Almora
02
12
787
March, 2014
11-
Champawat
01
06
299
March, 2014
12-
Nainital
02
12
847
March, 2014
13-
Udhamsingh Nagar
04
27
1240
March, 2014
27
210
10062
March, 2014
Total-
BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION:One of the biggest factors of success of the SVEEP campaign in Uttarakhand
can be attributed to the network of partners and sponsors who helped and supported its
implementation. The office of CEO, Uttarakhand and its election machinery at the district
level, will either partner or collaborate with a variety of organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, to implement SVEEP activities across the state. The range includes
government departments/organizations such as Doordarshan (DD), All India Radio (AIR),
Information Department, Higher Education Department, Planning Department, woman and
Child welfare department, Urban develop or Municipal etc., to non-government
organizations and Civil Society Organizations such as Mahila Mangal Dal, Yuvak Mangal
Dal, Fair Price shops, Medical Associations, NYKS, NSS and NCC, etc. For undertaking
such partnerships or collaborations, the first step that we have identified is to enlist the
range of all possible partners at District and State level.
Sl.No.
1-
2-
March, 2014
3-
March, 2014
4-
March, 2014
5-
March, 2014
6-
March, 2014
7-
March, 2014
8-
March, 2014
9-
March, 2014
10-
March, 2014
Bank branches.
Cooperatives.
Self-Help Groups
Anganwari Kendra.
Mahila Samakhya.
RESOURCE MOBILISATION
Resource
Message
Carriers
Details of Resource
Motivators
at Aanganwadi workers, ASHA workers,
grassroots level
Fair Price Shops owners, Campus
Ambassadors, labour Inspectors (for
migrant labourers), NGOs for Nomads
/ women, etc,
Content
Empanelled
agencies
of
State For Hoardings, posters and
Cinema slides.
developers
Information department.
Folk
art
based
animation
CSC E governance India Ltd
educative films.
For Various video clip and other
Experts from Information department
Street Plays.
Content to be developed by DEOs On the entire gamut of SVEEP
activities.
and vetted by CEO
Quickies, Radio Jingles, talk
Doordarshan and AIR
shows, live phone in programs,
interviews, etc.
168
Folk
dance,
Folk
Drama,
Folk
music
Number
of
Cultural troupes and Arts troupes .
identified in the
state
Banks
(these
activities
have
been proposed
and we are in the
process
of
consultation)
Activities
Urban
Development
Department
Women
&
Development
Department
Child
N.C.C.
Transport Department
Door Darshan
OVERALL APPROACH
Our overall approach will be that of Media Synergy as inherent to all our
strategies.
Voter Education for every voter is near impossible; however, we will consider
all kinds of media that directly reach people, for the following reasons:
We have a very short time period to achieve our goal, hence the only
way out is Communication Bombardment.
Different media will have to be considered in different ways for developing strategies
to communicate specialized messages. We are looking at including the following:
Television
Cable TV
Radio
Newspapers
Magazines
Internet
Cinema Theatres/Slides/Ads
Website
Special events
Briefings
Workshops
Direct e-Mail
SMS
TARGETED APPROACH
youth
women
urban voters
rural voters
CONTENT DEVELOPMENT
At the state level, a variety of content is being developed for
dissemination in the districts through a multitude of media. The State level
SVEEP team shall also be vetting the plethora of content that will be
developed by district level machinery. The content that is being / will be
developed at the state level and the target audience in focus for that content
has been provided in the table below.
Content developed
Target Audience
1-
for
2-
Slides.
3-
Radio/AIR
Jingles
Other Promos
4-
5-
6-
7-
Internet
8-
Telecommunication
9-
10-
11-
At Polling Station
12-
Banks
13-
OVERALL APPROACH
The calendar of activities has already been planned. The Calendar for March
to April, 2014 is prepared by all districts. The highlights of the approach
and some of the relevant activities are as follows:
Music and drama productions through our radio partners, NYKS and NSS and
college students for street shows.
Events Planned
1-
Marathons
03 Districts
2-
Human Chains
02 District
3-
Rallies
4-
Street plays
Scripts to be prepared
5-
6-
7-
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Name of Districts
No. of
VFCs at
District HQ
Uttarkashi
Chamoli
Rudrapryag
Tehri Garhwal
Dehradun
Haridwar
Pauri Garhwal
Pithoragarh
Bageshwar
Almora
Champawat
Nainital
Uadhamsingh Nagar
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
13
No. of VFCs at
Anganwari/ Mini
Anganwari
Kendra.
1052
1078
692
2017
1907
3179
1853
1111
834
1860
681
1416
2387
20067
No. of VFCs
at Fair Price
Shops.
No. of
VFCs at
Tahsils.
542
811
379
1075
942
530
949
763
433
935
331
618
612
8920
06
07
03
09
06
03
09
08
05
09
05
08
07
84
What will be the complaint / remedy? And how will DEO publicise it?
For complaint / remedy District Control Room will be activated 24x7 with the facility
of Toll Free Helpline No. 1950 and it will be given wide publicity through local media.
Round the clock office.
MONITORING MECHANISM
The monitoring of the above mentioned large-scale activities
across the state requires regular follow up from the state level to check the
progress of implementation of planned activities in the districts. At the state
level, the Joint CEO / Nodal Officer for SVEEP will oversee the SVEEP
activities across the state and hence carry out the periodic review along with
the 07-member review team from the core election machinery in the CEO
office.
At the District level, SVEEP Nodal Officers are being appointed and they
shall monitor the implementation of the SVEEP Plan and also intervene
for mid-course corrections/modifications/additions if any.
During the review meetings/discussions, based on the plan and
implementation activities can also be modified mid-course according to
requirement found from review. Thus, the plan remains flexible and
dynamic throughout the implementation period, allowing the activities to
be relevant and effective as required.
The review of SVEEP shall also involve:
are being monitored shall have a separate ERMS entry and Report format to
ensure that quick assessments are possible.