Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This project was funded in part under the Coastal Zone Management Act, by NOAA’s
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, in conjunction with Minnesota’s
Lake Superior Coastal Program and by local units of government of the North Shore of
Lake Superior.
FINAL REPORT
INTRODUCTION
In 2004 the North Shore Management Board (NSMB) completed an update of the North
Shore Management Plan (NSMP). In the plan there were several objectives that the
NSMB identified as priorities and imperative to the sustainability of the North Shore.
The NSMB started to complete projects on this list and identified the North Shore GIS
Assessment as a priority in 2007.
WORK COMPLETED
The NSMB completed this GIS Assessment with help from the NSMB Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC). The GIS Assessment consisted of three main steps;
identification of GIS utilization, needs identification, and document development.
The NSMB staff initiated the project with assistance from the TAC by identifying what
should be covered in the assessment and necessary outcomes. A list of potential needs
and problems was identified and the cities and townships were contacted. The local staff
was asked questions about their current GIS usage and need for GIS. It was established
by the local units of government staff that GIS was not being fully utilized by any of the
governments. The NSMB also briefly contacted the County governments and identified
that all three counties used GIS at varying levels. The NSMB Staff also contacted the
state agencies and local organizations that utilized GIS and worked to identify what data
they are developing or other similar GIS efforts.
The NSMB staff then established that meeting with the Town Boards and City Councils
was a more effective way to identify the GIS needs of each community. The NSMB
Staff then scheduled and gave presentations to the local units of government about the
capabilities of GIS and how it can benefit decision making. The elected officials were
then asked to identify needs that could be met with GIS. After the presentations the
governments were sent surveys that asked about the needs of their entity. NSMB staff
then followed up these surveys for better response and to better understand what type of
data, etc was needed. The three counties were sent similar surveys that identified how
they currently use GIS and current needs that they have.
The NSMB Staff then worked to compile the information that was gathered throughout
this process. A document was developed that identified needs that were expressed from
the local units of government and identified the current GIS efforts along the North
Shore.
RESULTS
The North Shore GIS Assessment Document will be distributed to GIS users and Data
Developers along the North Shore. This will be a unique tool that identifies the needs
and hopefully can be used for obtaining funding for local governments to develop further
their GIS efforts. It is the NSMB’s hope that further GIS projects and efforts will use this
report as a guide for future direction in developing data.
CONCLUSIONS
The process and products of the GIS Assessment were completed as planned. One bi-
product of this project that was unforeseen was the education that was included with the
presentations to the City Councils of Two Harbors, Beaver Bay, Silver Bay, Grand
Marais and the Towns of Lakewood, Duluth, and Silver Creek. Many of the elected
officials were introduced to GIS for the first time and it was a good introduction for them.
This document will continue to serve as a reference piece and will encourage future GIS
efforts.
North Shore Management Board GIS Assessment Survey
County Survey
The North Shore Management Board (NSMB) has received a grant from Minnesota’s
Lake Superior Coastal Program to identify how local governments are utilizing GIS. We
have put together a few questions that can help the NSMB identify how to pursue GIS
efforts in the future.
1. To what extent does your Government use GIS? (Circle all that apply)"
i. Everyday functions of many departments
ii. For future planning (Comprehensive, special area, etc)
iii. For re-zoning requests
iv. To track permits
v. For variance requests
vi. To track public utilities (sewer, septic systems, stormwater,
ditches, etc)
vii. To plan for transportation needs
viii. We do not use GIS
ix. Other:__________________
b. Do you see a need to acquire GIS software and training within your
government?
(This data could include things like: current road files, culvert locations, road
surfaces, up-to-date parcel layers, soil maps, zoning maps, land use maps, ISTS sites
impervious surface coverage, etc… Any type of information that can be portrayed on
a map.)
4. Does your government currently have GIS data sharing agreements in place with
other governments?
5. Does your government currently use GPS technology in maintaining and creating
GIS data?
6. Do you see a need for GIS and GPS training in your government?
North Shore Management Board GIS Assessment Survey
County Survey
7. Does your government currently contract with vendors for GIS data development?
a. Does your government, obtain digital copies of the data acquired in the
contract? (i.e. GIS data, aerial photography, CADD drawings)
8. How do you see your government utilizing GIS in the future? Do you foresee a
need for further GIS usage?
9. What role can the NSMB play in helping with GIS usage?
10. Does your government currently have hard copy maps or aerial photography not
available for use in GIS? (zoning maps, utility layers, etc…)
a. If yes, would your government be interested in making those products
available for use in GIS?
b. If yes, please list maps or photography.
10
11
1.
1.
1.
1
ue n 3
ue n 4
ue n 7
9
n
n
n
Q ion
n
n
n
io
io
io
io
io
io
io
io
io
io
io
io
io
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
st
y
tit
ue
ue
ue
ue
ue
ue
ue
ue
ue
ue
ue
En
Q
Integrate as
parcel much as
development, Funding possible,
All utilities, opportunities coordinate
St. Louis ArcGIS
functions n/a structures, yes yes yes for LIDAR and different
County 9.2
listed zoning, hydrology, Aerial deparments,
lidar, aerial Collaborative combine data
pictometry sets and
processes
Forestry,
Sherriffs parcel data, Funding and
organization,
Lake Dept, ArcGIS aerials, culvert, data
yes n/a no no yes yes yes cartography, yes
County Planning 9.2 signage, ROW development,
analysis
and layers direction
Zoning,
All planning and
functions zoning info, soils,
Coordination
Cook listed, ArcView parcels, erosion, Deeper
yes 2 yes yes yes bi no through the yes
County except 9.2 high resolution analysis
TAC
tracking imagery,
permits structures
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
November 1, 2007, 10:00a.m.
Cook County Courthouse
MEETING SUMMARY
2. NSMP Discussion
a. The NSMB was forwarded a letter from the City of Grand Marais expressing
their interest in the NSMB’s position on changing the City’s Protected
Resource Zone to Commercial zoning. The group agreed that more
information regarding the history of the zone is needed to take a more definite
position. However, the group agreed that if zoning is to be changed that the
changes should be in line with the North Shore Management Plan standards.
The group agreed that January 3, 2008 was not a good date for the next meeting and
that it should be pushed back a week to January 10th. Meeting location will be
determined, possibly in Two Harbors area.
z Page 2
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
January 10, 2008: 10:00a.m.
MEETING SUMMARY
6. Next Meeting: The next meeting was tentatively planned for March 6th, 2008.
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
March 6, 2008: 10:00a.m.
MEETING SUMMARY
6. Local Issues
a. Restricting development in cities was discussed. The TAC discussed whether the
NSMB should have density standards in already fully developed areas. The
development nodes document was also discussed and the TAC questioned if there was
follow-up to this project planned.
7. Next Meeting: The next meeting was not scheduled, but will likely be in early May.