Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TAI
ABSTRACT
In 200-250 words, the abstract:
Few people will closely read the entire lab report, but many will read
the abstract.
Communication within the society has always played a key role in shaping an
individual. In the current technologically advanced state of the society, social
media plays a huge role in shaping the personality of adolescents. The
literature suggests that individuals use social media in their own way
depending on their personalities. Factors such as extraversion, neuroticism,
emotional stability and willingness to explore are related to the way an
individual may use social media. Other factors such as gender, age and
nationality have also been considered in this dynamic. Results revealed that
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background Information
Internet is a medium of communication through which people can
connect socially, hold intimate interactions, exchange ideas and
extend their social circle. It is no surprise therefore, to find that many
psychologists are interested in studying the personal characteristics of
Internet users (Tosun & Lajunen, 2009). Internet has helped millions of
people connect globally and achieve what they otherwise would not be
able to. As the internet provides a plethora of opportunities and is a
treasure trove of new concepts, university students are automatically
attracted to it.
According to the Pew Research Centers Internet & American Life
Project tracking surveys 2005-2013, more than three quarters (89%) of
people aged 18-29, use social networking sites. Researchers have
found that, nearly two-third of teen internet users (63%) go online
every day (Lenhart, 2010).
Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are a few social networking sites that
allow interpersonal communication between users. With millions of
users worldwide of each of these sites, it raises the question of what
effects these have on the behavior of users. A 2007 study found that
among college students who used networking site Facebook less
frequently felt less satisfied with their lives (Ellison et al., 2007). Pew
Research Centers Teen Relationships Survey found that girls mostly
dominated visually oriented social media platforms such as Instagram
and Snapchat while boys dominated the group playing online video
games (Pew Research Center, 2015).
From previous researches, we can identify three distinct personality
traits of users based on the way they use social media
1.2
Problem Statement
Many researchers fail to realize that social media plays a much bigger
role in the lives of users today than it did five years ago. People are
constantly on social media for public opinion, news updates, latest
trends, new memes or trending vines. Young users today check their
smart phones more often to make sure they havent missed out on the
latest trend. We believe that social media is bring about an integral
change in the way people behave in their non-virtual lives. Since
university students are constantly socializing over social networks, they
1.3 Objectives
This research is intended to investigate the relationship of social media
and personality of its users. We will explore the influence of social
media in bringing about a change in the inherent personality of a heavy
social media user. We will look at gender and age as a defining factor in
how social networking sites influence human behavior. Moreover, we
believe that different nationalities fair differently in terms of change in
personality. Hence, we will explore its relation to personality and social
media.
1.4 Scope and Limitations
As all the participants of this research study are students of Asian
Institute of Technology (AIT), the study may not be true for people other
than university students. Moreover, the sample size of the survey is not
enough to ascertain a result that holds true for larger groups.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Social media make use of fast ad handy technologies like mobile and webbased technologies to create highly interactive platforms through which
people can share, create, discuss and modify user-generated content
(Kietzmann et al., 2011). Social media has massive benefits with regards to
youngsters. It has been known to enhance communication, social connection
and even technical skills. 75% of teenagers own cell phones, and 25% use
them for social media, 54% use them for texting and 24% use them for
instant messaging (OKeeffe & Clarke-Pearson, 2011). Out of 69% of the
teens that go online every day, 36% go online several times a day and 27%
go online about once a day (Lenhart et al., 2010). Therefore, a large part of
Student # Last Name 5
are supported by the literature. The reader should also clearly see that the previous
literature has left a need, or gap, for the current research.
Your literature review should answer most of the following questions:
1.
2.
What are the characteristics of the key concepts or the main factors or
variables?
3.
What are the relationships between these key concepts, factors or variables?
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
METHODOLOGY
The participants are Asian Institute of Technology students between 18 30 year
olds of all genders. The survey is filled online by google form so that the
participants have enough time to give honest thoughtful answers. Multiple choice
question is chosen in this survey to scale abstract questions and analyze the data
using probability and statistic in term of factors such as age, gender and nationality.
We might not get completely accurate answers but they should be more precise
than directly interviewing people about their social life. However, as the survey is
filled anonymously, the participants also could give incorrect answers or not be
serious about this. Moreover, too many questions may be mentally and emotionally
exhausting to their mind.
Participants are asked how long they spend online every day to categorize the
frequency of using social networking website by scale of time from less than 1 hour
to more than 5 hours per day. On the other hand, we ask them how long they have
been using it to observe the effective factor between experienced users and
inexperienced users.
We need to know how the data was obtained because the method affects the
results. For instance, if you are investigating users' perceptions of the efficiency
of public transport in Bangkok, you will obtain different results if you use a
multiple choice questionnaire than if you conduct interviews. Knowing how the
data was collected helps the reader evaluate the validity and reliability of your
results, and the conclusions you draw from them.
Often there are different methods that we can use to investigate a research
problem. Your methodology should make clear the reasons why you chose a
particular method or procedure.
The reader wants to know that the data was collected or generated in a way
that is consistent with accepted practice in the field of study. For example, if you
are using a questionnaire, readers need to know that it offered your respondents
a reasonable range of answers to choose from (asking if the efficiency of public
transport in Bangkok is "a. excellent, b. very good or c. good" would obviously
not be acceptable as it does not allow respondents to give negative answers).
The methodology should also discuss the problems that were anticipated and
explain the steps taken to prevent them from occurring, and the problems that
did occur and the ways their impact was minimized.
RESULTS
Cite all equations as below:
F E L
=
A
L
(1)
Each figure should have a title that briefly summarizes its topic. Use Fig. 1, then Fig.
2, and so on. Titles should appear at the bottom of the figure as seen below:
Student # Last Name 10
CONCLUSION
A typical conclusion contains most or all of the following:
A. Background Information
This is a somewhat free-standing move that can occur at any point in the cycle. As its
name implies, this move is employed by authors when they wish to strengthen their
B. Restatement of Results
If there is a quasi-obligatory move in Discussion section, it is this one. Likewise, KEY
results often at the start of the conclusion. Evidence suggests, as we might expect, that it
is the starting point of a cycle and is only likely to be preceded by brief background.
Critically evaluate the strength of your results. Readers typically expect that the strongest
results will be dealt with in the first paragraph and weaker results in later paragraphs.
C. (Un)expected Outcome
Here the writer comments on whether the result is unexpected or not.
F. Exemplification
Examples are most often used to support an explanation (Hopkins and Dudley-Evans,
1988).
G. Deduction and Hypothesis
This move is used to make a claim (however qualified) about the generalizability of some
or all of the reported results.
H. Recommendations
The writer advocates the need for further research or makes suggestions about possible
lines of future investigation.
REFERENCES
Angelov, I., & Zirathj, H. (1991). On the different types of MESFET-mixers.Microwave and Optical
Technology, 4(12).
Barth, M. M., Kerbel, E. L., Broussard, S., & Schmidt, S. J. (1993). Modified atmosphere packaging
protects market quality in broccoli spears under ambient temperature storage. Journal of
Food Science, 58(5).
Bjorkman, I., & Schaap, A. (1994). Outsiders in the Middle Kingdom: Expatriate managers in
Chinese-Western joint ventures. European Journalof Management , 12(2), 147-153.
Boucher,
J.,
&
Smeers,
Y.
(1996).
Optimal
development
planning
of
gas
analysis
and
implications
for
the
design
of
adaptive
decision
support
Kwan, A. K. H., & Cheung, Y. K. (1994). Analysis of coupled shear/core walls using a beam-type
finite element. Engineering Structures, 16(2).
Liberatore, M. J. (1987). An Extension of the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Industrial R&D Project
Selection and Resource Allocation. IEEETransactions on Engineering Management, EM-34(1).
Lim, C., Matsuda, Y., & Shigemi, Y. (1995). Problems and constraints in Philippine municipal
fisheries: the case of San Miguel Bay, Camarines Su'. Environmental Management, 19(6), 837852.
Paselk, T. A., & Mannering, F.L. (1994). Use of duration models for predicting vehicular delay at a
US/Canadian border crossing.Transportation, 21, 249-270.
Roll, Y., Rosenblatt, M., & Kadosh, D. (no date). On the optimal container size in automated
warehouses. Proceedings of the Ninth ICPR.
Sengupta, K. , & Abdel-Hamid, T. (1993). Alternative conceptions of feedback in dynamic decision
environments: an experimental investigation.Management Science, 39(4), 411-428.
Street, P., & Miles, I. (1996). Transition to alternative energy supply technologies: the case of wind
powe'. Energy Policy, 24(5), 413-426.
Swales, J. (1984). Research into the structure of introductions to journal articles and its application
to the teaching of academic writing. In R. Williams, J. Swales and J. Kirkman (Eds) Common
Ground: Shared Interests in ESP and Communication Studies. Oxford: Pergamon.
Takii, K., Shimeno, S., Nakamura, M., Itoh, Y.,
In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Feeding and Nutrition in Fish, Toba,
Japan, 281-288.
Wang, C. M., Xiang, Y., Kitipornchaij, S., & Liew, K.M. (1994). Buckling solutions for Mindlin plates
of various shapes. Engineering Structures, 16(2).
Wubben, E.A., H. N. Shapiro and R. M. Nelson (1989). Production and Storage of Ice for Cooling
Buildings. Transactions of the ASME, 111, 338 -346.
APPENDICES
Appendices follow the list of references. This is where you would add relevant information that
was not included in body of the paper, e.g. additional data, an example of a questionnaire,
transcripts, etc. Number or letter appendices and give each a title as if it were a chapter.
Example:
Appendix 1: Questionnaire
Appendix 2: BOI Regulations
OR
Appendix A: Derivation of Equations