Professional Documents
Culture Documents
110
Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20 (1) : 2008
T5 – HBR @ 1.0 ppm at 45+60 DAS Yoshida et al. (1971) and Somogyi (1952) and soluble protein
T6 – HBR @ 0.25 ppm at 30+45+60 DAS by Lowry et al. (1951). The catalase and peroxidase activity
were analysed by the methods of Sadasivam and Manickam
T7 – HBR @ 0.5 ppm at 30+45+60 DAS
(1996).
T8 – HBR @ 1.0 ppm at 30+45+60 DAS
The morphological parameters like plant height,
Sampling for biochemical analysis and growth number of leaves, number of branches and LAI (Table. 1)
parameters were recorded one week after the spray. All the yield increased with increasing number of sprays and dosage of spray
parameters were recorded at the time of harvest. The growth as compared to control and water spray. Similar result was
parameters like leaf area index was calculated by the formula of reported by Ramraj et al. (1997). Increased LAI might be due to
Williams (1946), specific leaf weight by Pearce et al. (1968), crop activities of meristamatic tissues of plant, increasing number
growth rate by Watson (1958) and net assimilation rate by and size of cell, which ultimately increased photosynthetic
Williams (1946). The biochemical parameters viz., chlorophyll surface area. Similarly specific leaf weight, net assimilation rate
and sugar content were estimated following the procedures of and relative growth rate were found maximum with application
Table-2. Effect of 28-homobrassinolide on biochemical parameters of sesame at different days of spraying.
Treatment Chlorophyll Soluble protein Reducing sugar Non reducing Catalase Peroxidase
content (mg.g-1) (mg.g-1) (mg.g-1) sugar (mg.g-1) (Units/g tissue) (Units/l)
30 DAS
T1 0.278 7.26 4.561 3.258 2.054 2.10
T2 0.369 7.45 4.815 3.489 2.114 2.13
T6 0.456 9.01 5.468 3.924 2.226 2.19
T7 0.532 9.45 5.692 4.103 2.389 2.23
T8 0.596 9.81 5.918 4.115 2.448 2.26
CD(0.05) 0.012 0.14 0.07 0.17 0.007 0.012
45 DAS
T1 0.562 9.23 5.215 4.568 2.213 2.63
T2 0.623 9.43 5.326 4.572 2.324 2.75
T3 0.659 10.45 5.678 4.654 2.365 2.86
T4 0.692 10.98 5.926 4.785 2.412 2.94
T5 0.723 11.56 6.012 4.956 2.654 3.01
T6 0.712 11.35 6.001 4.856 2.623 2.98
T7 0.793 11.79 6.248 5.012 2.784 3.12
T8 0.892 11.98 6.456 5.124 2.895 3.24
CD(0.05) 0.022 0.27 0.15 0.16 0.167 0.17
60 DAS
T1 1.015 9.65 7.891 6.532 3.121 2.91
T2 1.132 9.78 7.956 6.756 3.211 3.11
T3 1.235 10.12 8.214 7.254 3.356 3.26
T4 1.325 10.25 8.458 7.768 3.506 3.35
T5 1.465 10.91 9.135 8.245 3.789 3.75
T6 1.442 10.89 8.968 8.212 3.621 3.70
T7 1.482 10.96 9.217 9.012 3.807 3.78
T8 1.496 11.01 9.269 9.124 3.885 3.94
CD(0.05) 0.032 0.45 0.22 0.36 0.225 0.23
of 1.0 ppm of homobrassinolide thrice (Prakash et al., 2003). The 1.0 ppm HBR. The application of 1.0 ppm of HBR at 30, 45 and 60
crop growth rate was maximum in the plants treated with 1.0 DAS recorded maximum number of capsules (98.6), number of
ppm of 28- homobrassinolide at 30, 45 and 60 DAS. The dry seeds per capsule (40.7), capsule weight (0.67 g) and 1000 seed
matter production increased at a faster rate in the twice and weight (2.17 g). The yield per plant (5.24g) was significantly
thrice treated plants with 1.0 ppm of homobrassinolide. This increased in the plants treated with 1.0 ppm HBR at vegetative,
might be attributed to the improvement in plant growth, dry flowering and capsule formation stages when compared to the
matter and leaf area due to HBR spray. Similarly RGR and NAR plants sprayed with 0.25 and 0.5 ppm homobrassinolide. The
also increased with the application of 1.0 ppm homobrassinolide increase in yield due to application of HBR was in consonance
thrice. The effect of HBR on biochemical parameters like total
with the findings of Mai et al. (1989) and Prakash et al. (2006) in
chlorophyll content was found to be maximum in plants treated
rice and sesame respectively. Besides increasing the yield, the
with 1.0 ppm of HBR (Table. 2). Increased chlorophyll content
oil content was significantly enhanced in the plants treated with
with the plant growth regulators has been reported by many
workers. The total sugar content was maximum in the plants HBR thrice. The increased leaf area, crop growth rate and
treated with 1.0 ppm homobrassinolide thrice followed by 0.5 biomass production simultaneously increased the harvest index.
ppm HBR thrice treated plants. Soluble protein content in sesame The results revealed that spraying of 1.0 ppm HBR thrice at
was found to be enhanced by three times application of vegetative, flowering and capsule formation stages increased
homobrassinolide 1.0 ppm. Brassinosteriods were found to leaf area index, specific leaf weight, relative growth rate and net
enhance the level of nucleic acid, soluble protein and assimilation rate. Chlorophyll, sugars, soluble protein, catalase
carbohydrates (Vardhini and Rao, 1998). The catalase activity and peroxidase activity were also found to be enhanced. Yield per
(3.885 units/tissue sample) and peroxidase (3.94 units/l) were plant and oil content were also increased significantly due increase
observed maximum in the plants sprayed thrice (60 DAS) with in morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters.
References
Cutler, H.G., Yokota, T. and Adam, G., (Eds), 1991, Brassinosteroids: Ramraj, V. M., Vyas, B.N., Godrej, N.B., Mistry, K. B., Swami, B.N.
Chemistry, Bio activity and Applications. In: American and Singh, N., 1997, Effects of 28-homobrassinolide on yields
Chemical Society Symposium Series, No. 474. Washington D.C: of wheat, rice, groundnut, mustard, potato and cotton. J. Agri.
American Chemical Society. Scie., 128: 405 – 413.
Kalinch, J.F., Mandava, N.B. and Todhunter, J.A., 1985, Relationship
Sadasivam, S. and Manickam, A., 1996, Biochemical Methods. New
of nucleic acid metabolism to brassinolide – induced response
in beans. J. of Pl. Physio., 120: 207 – 214. Age International Publishers, New Delhi,5-6
Lowry, O.H., Rosen Rough, N.J., Farr, L.A. and Randall, R.J., 1951, Sairam, R. K., 1994, Effect of homobrassinolide application on plant
Protein measurements with folin phenol reagent. J. Biologl. metabolism and grain yield under irrigated and moisture stress
Chemi., 193: 265 – 275. condition of two wheat varieties. Pl. Grth. Regult., 14: 173 –
Mai, Y.Y., Lin, J.M., Zeng, X.L. and Pan, R. Z., 1989, Effects of 181.
brassinolide on the activity of nitrate reductase in rice seedlings.
Sasse, J.M., 1999, Physiological actions of brassinosteroids. In:
Pl. Physio. Commn., 2: 50-52.
Brassinosteroids – Steroidal Plant Hormones, eds.Sakurai,A.
Mandava, N.B., Sasse, J.M. and Yopp, J.H., 1981, Brassinolide, a Yokota, T. and Clouse,S. D., Springer, Tokyo, pp. 137 -161.
growth promoting steroidal lactone- II, Activity in selected
gibberellin and cytokinin bioassays. Physiologia Plantarum, Somogyi, M., 1952, Notes on sugar determination. J. Biocl. Chem.,
53: 453-461 200: 145 – 154.
Pearce, R.B., Brown, R.H. and Balster, R.E., 1968, Photosynthesis of Vardhini, B.V. and Rao, S. S. R., 1998, Effect of brassinosteroids on
alfalfa leaves as influenced by age and environment. Crp. Sci,, growth, metabolite content and yield of Arachis hypogaea.
6: 677-680. Photochem., 48: 927 – 930.
Prakash, M., Saravanan, K., Sunilkumar, B. And Ganesan, J., 2003, Watson, D.J., 1958, The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf
Effect of Brassinosteroids on certain biochemical parameters area index. Ann. of Bot., 22:37-54.
in groundnut. Indian J. Pl. Physiol., 8 : 313-315.
Williams, R.E., 1946, The physiology of plant growth with special
Prakash, M., Suganthi, S., Gokulakrishnan, J. and Sabesan, T., 2006, reference to the concept of NAR. Ann of Bot., 10:41-71.
Influence of 28-homobrassinolide on morphological, growth,
biochemical and yield parameters of sesame. Crp. Res. 32:535- Yoshida, S., Forna, D.A. and Cock, J.H., 1971, Laboratory Manual for
538. Physiological Studies on Rice. IRRI Publication, Phillippines.
112