24 Kensington Rd

Rose Park SA 5067

Phone: 1300 880 579
Fax: 8332 4744
www.adelaidebodyscan.com.au

BODY COMPOSITION

Patient: Daniel Nicholls

Age: 33.1
Gender: Male

Client: Daniel Nicholls

Birth Date: 31/12/1982

Height: 182.0 cm

Page 1 of 6

Exam Date:29/02/2016
Weight: 89.4 kg

Exam Date: Monday, 29 February 2016

24 Kensington Rd
Rose Park SA 5067
Phone: 1300 880 579
Fax: 8332 4744
www.adelaidebodyscan.com.au

ESTIMATED VISCERAL ADIPOSE TISSUE

Evidence based research has highlighted the
extreme importance of visceral fat (fat that
accumulates around your abdominal organs)
in the development of cardiovascular disease
and onset of type 2 diabetes. Your estimated
visceral fat content is critical in calculating
your cardiovascular risk. Subcutaneous
(cosmetic) fat is not as important in the
diagnosis of cardiovascular risk.

Estimated Visceral
Adipose Tissue:

948 g

Amount change:

-1,189 g

Percentage Change
since last scan:

-55.6%

Fat Weight:

26,296 g

Amount change:

-13,460 g

Percentage Change
since last scan:

-33.9%

Tissue %Fat:

30.5%

The ratio of visceral vs subcutaneous fat is

thought to be one of the key predictors for
the development of metabolic disorders like
type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood
pressure and atherosclerosis (fat deposits in
the arteries). These are the leading causes of
heart attacks and strokes in our community.
FAT

Composition Reference Centile Graph

shows your Total Body %Fat result
compared to a reference population. This
comparison is very similar to how babies are
measured and compared to reference data for
height and weight. The bold black line on
the graph represents the 50th percentile
(median) result for the reference population.
The square on the graph represents your
result. There are currently no standard
definitions of normal or obesity based on
%Fat results, but you can see how you
compare to this reference population.
Client: Daniel Nicholls

Page 2 of 6

Exam Date: Monday, 29 February 2016

24 Kensington Rd
Rose Park SA 5067
Phone: 1300 880 579
Fax: 8332 4744
www.adelaidebodyscan.com.au

Client: Daniel Nicholls

Page 3 of 6

Exam Date: Monday, 29 February 2016

24 Kensington Rd
Rose Park SA 5067
Phone: 1300 880 579
Fax: 8332 4744
www.adelaidebodyscan.com.au

LEAN
Lean mass includes all parts of the body
[organs, muscle, and fluids] but excludes
body fat.
The higher the Tissue %Lean, the more
muscular the body.

Total Weight:

89.7 kg

Amount Change:

-15.4 kg

Percentage Change
since last scan:

-14.7%

Lean Weight:

59,872 g

Amount Change:

-1,850 g

Percentage Change
since last scan:
Tissue %Lean:

-3.0%
66.8%

Region
Android:
Gynoid:
A/G Ratio:

Tissue %Fat
38.0%
29.1%
1.31

ANDROID / GYNOID (waist / hip)

While Total Body %Fat will tell you more
about your overall fitness than your weight
alone, regional fat distribution tells you
where the fat is located.
Android (waist) fat is often associated with
apple-shaped body types.
Gynoid (hip) fat is often associated with
pear-shaped body types.

RESTING METABOLIC RATE (RMR)

RMR:
1,982 cal/day
Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) is
RMR (Resting Metabolic Rate) based on Harris-Benedict equation.
synonymous
with
Resting
Energy RMR(male) = 66.473 - (6.775 x age[yrs]) + (13.7516 x weight[kg]) + (5.0033 x
height[cm])
Expenditure (REE) and is an estimate of Harris JA, Benedict FG. A biometric study of basal metabolism in man. Washington, DC:
Carnegie Institute of Washington, 1919. (Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication
how many calories you would burn if you
279).
were to do nothing but rest. It represents the
minimum amount of energy needed to
maintain body temperature, heartbeat, and
respiratory rate.
Client: Daniel Nicholls

Page 4 of 6

Exam Date: Monday, 29 February 2016

24 Kensington Rd
Rose Park SA 5067
Phone: 1300 880 579
Fax: 8332 4744
www.adelaidebodyscan.com.au

RELATIVE SKELETAL MUSCLE INDEX (RSMI)

RSMI represents the relative amount of
muscle in the arms and legs.

RSMI:

8.42 kg/m

Amount Change:

-0.42 kg/m

Percentage Change
since last scan:

-4.8%

RSMI (Relative Skeletal Muscle Index) based on Baumgartner equation.

RSMI = (lean mass of arms[kg] + lean mass of legs[kg]) / (height[m])
Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymsfield SB, Ross RR, Garry
PJ, Lindeman RD (1998) Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico.
Am J Epidermiol 147(8):755-763.

BONE
BMC
(g)
3,514

BMD
(g/cm2)

1.426

T-score

Z-score

Centile

2.2

1.7

96

A bone densitometry test helps your

physician to diagnose osteoporosis.
The test compares your Bone Mineral
Density (BMD) to that of a "young adult" at
peak bone strength, displayed as your
T-score.
It also compares your results to people of
your same age, called "age-matched"
displayed as your Z-score.
This information, along with other factors,
helps physicians assess your risk of
osteoporotic fracture.

Client: Daniel Nicholls

Page 5 of 6

Exam Date: Monday, 29 February 2016

24 Kensington Rd
Rose Park SA 5067
Phone: 1300 880 579
Fax: 8332 4744
www.adelaidebodyscan.com.au

ANCILLARY REPORT
Region

Tissue
(%Fat)
21.2
Arms
Right Arm 20.9
21.4
Left Arm
26.8
Legs
26.7
Right Leg
26.9
Left Leg
35.7
Trunk
Trunk Right 35.8
Trunk Left 35.6
38.0
Android
29.1
Gynoid
30.5
Total
Total Right 30.4
30.6
Total Left

Region
(%Fat)
20.1
19.9
20.4
25.7
25.6
25.7
34.9
34.9
34.8
37.6
28.4
29.3
29.2
29.4

Tissue (g)

Fat (g)

Lean (g)

BMC (g)

8,581
4,299
4,282
28,851
14,563
14,288
44,167
21,301
22,867
6,848
14,640
86,168
42,345
43,823

1,818
899
918
7,735
3,890
3,845
15,770
7,628
8,142
2,601
4,254
26,296
12,884
13,412

6,764
3,400
3,364
21,116
10,673
10,444
28,398
13,673
14,725
4,247
10,386
59,872
29,461
30,411

454
227
227
1,281
638
643
1,056
538
519
71
340
3,514
1,750
1,764

Tissue (g)

Fat (g)

Lean (g)

BMC (g)

17
275
-1,566
-1,478

-19
46
-514
-528

36
229
-1,052
-950

0
-5
19
-14

Total Mass
(kg)
9.0
4.5
4.5
30.1
15.2
14.9
45.2
21.8
23.4
6.9
15.0
89.7
44.1
45.6

RIGHT VS LEFT SIDE DIFFERENCES

Region
Arms
Legs
Trunk
Total

Tissue
(%Fat)
-0.5
-0.2
0.2
-0.2

Region
(%Fat)
-0.5
-0.2
0.1
-0.2

Total Mass
(kg)
0.0
0.3
-1.5
-1.5

FAT MASS RATIOS

Trunk vs Limbs Fat Mass: 1.65
Legs vs Total Fat Mass: 0.29
Limbs vs Trunk Fat Mass: 0.61
Trunk vs Total Fat Mass: 0.60
Thankyou for choosing Adelaide BodyScan once again!

Client: Daniel Nicholls

Page 6 of 6

Exam Date: Monday, 29 February 2016