Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-_
NASA
"
<
Z
TECHNICAL
NOTE
D-882
i)
,
TN
STRESS
CONCENTRATIONS
IN
FILAMENTARY
STRUCTURES
By
John
Langley
Langley
NATIONAL
WASHINGTON
AERONAUTICS
M.
Hedgepeth
Research
Field,
AND
Center
Va.
SPACE
ADMINISTRATION
May
1961
"_
D-882
t_
IA
NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS
AND
TECHNICAL
STRESS
NOTE
CONCENTRATIONS
By
IN
John
SPACE
M.
ADMINISTRATION
D- 882
FILAMENTARY
STRUCTURES
Hedgepeth
SUMMARY
Theoretical
sheet
of
analyses
parallel
are
filaments
made
which
of
the
carry
normal
in a matrix
which
carries
only
shear.
infinity
is assumed
and small-deflection
Static
and dynamic
stress-concentration
ments
being
broken
dynamic
overshoot
dynamic-response
broken
filaments
are determined.
resulting
when
the
is
obtained
distributions
loads
In
all cases,
elasticity
factors
due
Particular
filaments
factor
increases
from
is increased
from one
dynamic-response
factor
the filament
sheet.
stress
are
hole
is
imbedded
uniform
loading
at
theory
is used.
to one or more
fila-
attention
is
are suddenly
1.15 to 1.27
to infinity.
when
and
in
as
A
paid
the
broken.
The
the number
of
somewhat
lower
suddenly
caused
in
INTRODUCTION
or
Structures
fabricated
from
plied
are becoming
prevalent
fine filaments
that
are
in flight
applications.
wound,
Many
woven,
solid-
propellant
rocket-motor
cases,
for instance,
are being
constructed
by
winding
resin-coated
glass
filaments
on a mandrel.
The high-strength
glass
filaments
carry
the pressurization
loads
and the resin
forms
a
matrix
which
produces
a unitized
efficient
material.
tions
make
use of the good
foldability
of coated
large,
low-density
structures
into
small
volumes
by mechanical
means
or inflation
is desired.
Other
applica-
fabrics
to package
until
their
erection
considered
filamentary
Whenever
stress,
through
rium.
as continuums,
configurations.
one
or
more
little
fibers
is
is
known
suddenly
about
broken
such
in
stress
fabric
behavior
under
the load
in the broken
fiber
or fibers
must
be transferred
the matrix
to the adjacent
fibers
in order
to restore
equilibOf interest
is not only
the resulting
static
stress
state
but
2
also the dynamic overshoot which occurs during the transient phase. Both
of these results are obtained in this paper for several types of "cutouts"
in the simple case of an infinite
flat sheet of parallel
filaments
stressed in uniform tension along the direction
of the filaments.
The model treated is that which is commonin shear-lag analyses;
that is, it is composedof tension-carrying
elements connected by purely
shear-carrying material.
The static problem is solved first
and the
details of the dynamic analysis are relegated to the appendix. The
results are essentially
exact within the framework of small-deflection
elasticity
theory.
SYMBOLS
a,b
major
filament
EA
extensional
Gh
shear
Kc
stress-concentration
factor
for
Ke
stress-concentration
factor
for
an
stress-concentration
factor
for
load
in
for
mass
per
n_m
indexes
applied
force
Pn
load
nth
Pn
dimensionless
number
R( )
real
and
minor
axes
ellipse
spacing
stiffness
stiffness
in
of
nth
part
length
on
filament
matrix
filament
at
broken
nth
filaments
variable
filament
hole
elliptical
broken
with
filament
in
circular
influence-function
associated
each
load
of
the
filament
unit
of
of
of
hole
filaments
solution
filament
infinity
3
S
Laplace
time
transform
displacement
variable
of nth
filament
dimensionless
displacement
dimensionless
displacement
Z_
of nth
filament
L
_i:_ 1
displacement
filament
for influence-function
coordinate
parallel
coordinate
normal
complex
_c
dynamic-response
factor
for a circular
hole
_r
dynamic-response
factor
for
filaments
transform
:2
:F
of nth
to filaments
to filaments
variable
broken
variable
dimensionless
coordinate
(l
dimensionless
stress
dimensionless
time
cp,_
elliptical
v2:
+
_x 2
solution
parallel
to
filaments
coordinates
)
8y2
an asterisk
denotes
Laplace
transform
in time
ANALYSIS
The configuration
with the coordinate
and
by a constant
distance
upward.
The coordinate
under consideration
is shown in figure i together
notation
systems.
The filaments
are separated
and are numbered
from
-_
to
_
from the bottom
along the filaments
is denoted by
x
and the
" .
i'
displacement
by
of
Un(X,t).
sion)
is
the
nth
filament
Similarly,
called
the
Pn(X,t)
at
location
force
and
in
the
is
given
in
Pn
= EA-
nth
and
time
filament
terms
of
is
given
(positive
un
in
ten-
by
Bun
where
EA
force
per
ment
is
is
the
unit
Gh(un+
matrix.
extensional
length
I
in
Un)/d
Equilibrium
of
stiffness
the
bay
of
between
where
an
Gh
element
is
of
In
figure
i,
remainder
are
0_n
<= r - i
conditions
filament.
nth
the
the
ax--
assumption
with
the
the
the
EA a2un + Gh
where
the
associated
(I)
ax
shear
nth
and
are
shear
l)st
stiffness
of
then
filathe
requires
a2un
= m at2
filaments
The
(n +
filament
shown
intact.
In
denote
the broken
and
shown
general,
for
filaments.
per unit
length
at that
filament.
broken
r
The
(2)
at
= 0
and
the
broken
filaments,
let
appropriate
boundary
are:
h
Pn(O,t)
= 0
(0 _
n _
r -
I)
(3)
un(0, t)
For
x
uniform
large,
applied
of course,
the force
in
force
which
is denoted
pn(_,t)
are
For the
required:
= 0
time-dependent
problem,
(n <
each
filament
as
p.
Thus
or
n _
approaches
r)
f
the
= p
the
(4)
following
initial
conditions
(_)
Pn(X'O)
aUn-(x,O)
= P: o
at
J
_"i./,
:3
.:_',
:. :']',
Nondimensionalization
/
In
order
to
obtain
convenient
form
Pn
= PPn
un
=P_U
for
the
problem,
let
(6)
L
i<
t=m
From
tion
these
equations
is obtained:
the
1"
following
partial-differential--difference
_2U n
_2U n
--b_2 +
with
boundary
Un+ I -
2U n +
initial
Un_ I
(7)
bT2
conditions
Un(O,_): 0
(n
<
Pn(O, T)
(0
<: n <=
Pn(_+%
and
equa-
T)
= 0
or
r -
_
i)
r)
(8)
= 1
conditions
A
Pn(_,O)
The
dimensionless
forces
and
= i
bun
b-C (_,o) : o
displacements
are
related
(9)
by
(lO)
Solution
The
equation
conditions
ary
conditions
at
Pn
this
difficulty.
solely.
The
Influence-function
applied
edge
load
intact.
Static
Problem
boundary-value
problem
for static
loading
is constituted
by
(7) with
the right.hand
side set equal
to zero and boundary
(8).
The solution
is complicated
by the fact that
the bound-
nor
no
of
Displace
and
the
tain
zero displacement
the resulting
forces
are
mixed;
following
technique.in which
end
of
that
is,
approach
is
Consider
a
all filaments
the
zeroeth
at
x = 0
of
and displacements
of influence
functions
can then
lem in the following
manner:
they
be
apply
convenient
filament
but the
filament
to
for
unit
neither
sheet
which
zeroeth
one
amount,
superposed
to
obtain
the
Un
overcoming
has
are
main-
and denote
This
set
actual
prob-
OO
= 1
Pn(_)
/,
m
--
Ln_m(_)
Um(O
Vn-m(_)
Um(O)
oo
O0
Un(_)
_
m__
But
boundary
conditions
(8)
yield
first
r-1
m=O
(11)
r-1
Un(_)
= _ + /___ Vn-m(_)
Um(O)
m=O
since
Um(O)
= 0
for
other
values
r-i
= 1 +
/,
J
of
m,
and
second
Ln_m(O)
Urn(O)
(0 <= n <r=
i)
m=O
which
is
the
specification
of
the
boundary
conditions
on
the
loads.
(12)
5
0
2
Equations
Um(0).
the
They
entire
(12)
can
constitute
solved
substituted
solution.
Determination
for
_ > 0
stated
be
and
First,
of
as
the
set
of
however,
influence
equations
back
the
in
Ln
for
values
functions
the
equations
Ln.-
must
The
unknowns
(ll)
be
problem
to
yield
determined.
can
be
(13)
L
1
_5
with
the
conditions
0
2
Vn(O) : 1
(n
= 0)
Vn(O) : 0
(n
/ O)
(14)
dVn
dq- (_)--0
In
order
to
solve
this
problem,
let
OO
V(_,8)
n=or,
Vn(_)
/.
e -in8
(15)
oo
inversely,
Vn(_ ) _ 1
(16)
V(_,e) einede
2x
Then,
multiplying
equation
(13)
by
e -in8
4 sin 2
Similar
treatment
of
the
boundary
and
eV=o
= 1
over
all
gives
(17)
conditions
V(o,e)
summing
(14)
yields
(18)
(_,e): o
The
solution
satisfying
equations
(17)
_
V=e
Thus,
from
equation
and
(18)
is
-21sin--_ I_
(16)
Vn (_)
= i
cos
/0 _
n0
e-2_sin_
Bessel
and
de
(19)
.L
which
nary
can
be
expressed
argument.
necessary
For
since
in
the
terms
of
present
attention
purposes_
will
be
Weber
however_
centered
on
functions
the
of
reduction
Ln(O ) - dVn
(0)
imagi-
is
not
which
d_
is
given
simply
by
Ln(O ) =
(20)
(4n
2that
Stress-concentration
the maximum
force
adjacent
for
virtue
to
the
broken
of
factors.Inspection
of the
occurs
at
_ = 0
in the first
broken
ones.
filaments
symmetry.
is
Thus_
given
the
by
problem
intact
stress-concentration
Pr(O)
which
Lr_m(O)
Um(O)
equals
indicates
filament
factor
P_I(O)
Kr
by
Now,
r-i
Pr(O)
= i + _
(21)
m=O
Solution
of
equations
equation
(21) yields
been
carried
out for
following
the
an
(12)
for
the
Um(O)
stress-concentration
r
of i to 6 and
the
table
r
Kr
i
2
4/3
3
4
5
6
64/35
8/5
128/63
512/231
1,o24/429
and
factor.
results
substitution
into
This
process
are given
in
has
the
Inspection
of
these
values
K r
Although
ness
for
values
that
they
can
be
(2r
2)
(2r
i)
written
as
(22)
this
result
has not
the first
six values
of
show
been
established
lends
credence
in general,
its correctto its validity
for all
r.
L
i
Solution
of
Dynamic
taken
of
Problem
5
0
2
If
a Laplace
transform
is
the
time-dependent
equation
(eq.
(7)) and boundary
conditions
(eq.
(8)),
tions
are similar
in form
to the static
equations
and
approach
can be
are considerably
resulting
used
for their
solution.
more
complicated
and are
timewise
variation
of
the
of
calculation
upper
limit
on the
the next
section.
and
dynamic
stress-concentration
because
of
overshoot.
As
can
an
be
seen
value,
as the energy
oscillations
for
r
to
those
of
from
oscillation
figure
that
OF
2,
the
decays
in
is carried
away
= i
and
r = 2
one-degree-of-freedom
principal
result
to
be
extracted
The
dynamic_response
maximum
filaments
stress
are
given
factor
and
the
static
in
the
following
existence
_r
upper
for
the
of
limit
is
shown
greater
increasing
an
is
apparent
discussed
stress-concentration
a few
system.
from
equaof
in
RESULTS
cycles
For
to
factor
the
steady-state
by wave motion.
The
simple
and are similar
r
3,
the
oscillatio:_
component
appearing
in the
is the largest
one; the value
dynamic
overshoot
and is the
the
Dynamic-Response
the
the
to infinity
are fairly
is more
complex,
an apparent
second-mode
history.
In all cases,
the first
peak
the stress
at this
peak
determines
the
factor
Solutions
because
of
This
DISCUSSION
exhibits
resulting
same type
The details
of the solutions
contained
in appendix
A.
The
in figure
2 for I, 2, and 3 broken
filaments.
numbers
of broken
filaments
were
not obtained
difficulty
differential
the
the
dynamic
time
of
analysis.
Factor
is
defined
stress.
table:
Values
as
the
for
i_
ratio
2,
between
and
3 broken
{,
, "
"
_ i
10
The dynamic
overshoot
of broken
filaments.
to
be
the
highest
_r
1.15
1.19
i. 20
thus
apparently
The overshoot
in
the
limit
as
increases
with
can therefore
be
the
number
of
increasing
reasonably
number
expected
broken
filaments
filaments.-
As
approaches
infinity.
Results
noted,
ficulty
to
the
of
an
infinite
number
greater
the number
solution;
but the
analysis
The
stringer
stiffness
in
is
for
and
is
treated
of
broken
of broken
filaments,
limiting
case
itself
in
appendix
has
been
the greater
the difis readily
amenable
B.
analysis
in appendix
B deals
with
the so-called
continuous
sheet
which
is an orthotropic
mediumwith
finite
extensional
in the longitudinal
direction,
infinite
extensional
stiffness
the transverse
direction,
and finite
shear
stiffness.
Its
governed
by the nondimensionalized
differential
equation
behavior
v2U _
(23)
_.r 2
which
order
is obtained
difference
either
by
in equation
direct
derivation
or by
(7) with
its appropriate
replacing
the
derivative
second-
equivalent.
The breaking
of an infinite
number
of filaments
is accomplished
by
placing
a finite-length
slit in the sheet.
As is well-known_
this
procedure
leads
to an infinite
stress-concentration
factor
in the static
problem,
the stress
tance
from the end
dynamic
problem.
the variation
of
with time.
This
can be seen,
discontinuities
the
varying
as the inverse
of the slit.
The stress
strength
arise
from
C
exhibits
discontinuities
in
the reflection
of waves
issuing
to obtain
and
The resulting
should
be
an
upper
regimes
Results
apparently
would
dynamic-response
_
which
power
of
similarly
the
in
disthe
Thus_
the dynamic
behavior
can be studied
by finding
the strength
or magnitude
of the stress
singularity
central
result
of appendix
B is shown
in figure
3As
of the slit.
Only
the first
two
with
the eventual
static
value.
difficult
stresses.
one-half
behaves
limit
on
= 1.27
mr-
are
for
shown
in
subsequent
not contribute
factor
is
slope.
from
These
the ends
figure
3 together
regimes
are very
any
greater
'"
Vt
_"
ii
Hole
in a stringer
sheet.In the foregoing
sections,
only
slits
have been
treated.
Of interest
also
is the case
in which
a hole
is
punched
out of the material.
Because
of the usefulness
of conformal
mapping
techniques,
the
static
problem
is
variety
of hole
shapes
for a stringer
tical
shapes,
the stress-concentration
to be
Ke
easily
sheet.
factor
= 1 +
analyzed
In
is
for
particular,
derived
in
large
for ellipappendix
C
(24)
L
i
where
sions
of
pertaining
elliptical
,0
is
coordinate
ratio
between
the
transverse
system
has
static
Kc
with
factor
longitudinal
dimen-
time
is
shown
in
figure
factor
of
boundary,
the dynamic
in appendix
C and the
4.
The
resulting
the
slit.
2.
problem
variation
is
dynamic-response
is
_c
which
is
considerably
less
than
= 1.08
that
for
CONCLUDING
that
and
stress-concentration
In this
latter
case
of a circular
tractable.
The analysis
is given
also
of
the
the elliptical
hole
in the nondimensional
coordinate
system
to equation
(23).
For example,
a stringer
sheet
with
an
hole that
transforms
into a circle
in the nondimensional
The
the
acting
results
highest
in
the
derived
in this
dynamic-response
neighborhood
of
REMARKS
paper
lead to the
factor
applicable
suddenly
induced
apparent
to the
discontinuities
This
value
was obtained
for the case of a long
slit in
packed
filaments.
Either
reducing
the number
of broken
opening
response
The
the slit
factor.
into
analysis
was
hole
based
can
on
be
expected
elastic,
conclusion
stresses
to
decrease
the
small-deflection
1.27.
closely
or
dynamic-
theory
of
two-dimensional
a large
number
medium.
In
of filaments
ments
themselves
weave
introduces
mations,
large
may
follow
Hooke's
law very well;
the matrix
or the
large
nonlinear
effects
in the form
of plastic
defordeflections,
and fiber
straightening.
These
factors
should
increase
overshoot
act
to
the
reduce
the
dynamic
relative
actuality,
filamentary
through
the thickness
is
sheet
of
filaments
stress
concentrations
overshoot.
to
the
possible
In
view
effects
of
sheets
usually
have
and, whereas
the fila-
and,
the
of
at
least,
smallness
these
other
of
not
the
factors,
dynamic
future
12
theoretical
work
on
lyzing
better
models
this
subject
of various
Langley
Research
Center,
National
Aeronautics
Langley
Field,
and
Va.,
would
seem to be best
devoted
to
types
of filamentary
construction.
Space
March
Administration,
20, 1961.
ana-
13
APPENDIX
DYNAMIC
h vi-
.:i
BEHAVIOR
OF
SHEET
WITH
SUDDENLY
time
of
BROKEN
FILAMENTS
Let
U_(_,s)
of
the
Laplace
where
equations
s
(7)
transform
is
and
the
in
transform
(8)
Un(_,T)
variable.
be
Then,
denoted
taking
by
transforms
yields
--+Un+
I- (2+
+Un_ i =-s_
(_)
U*(O,s)
= 0
(n <
s) =o
_
where
to
for
in
the
initial
condition
Again,
use
transformed
conditions
Un(_,O)
or
(O<=n<=r
n >= r)
i)
(Ae)
(9)
the
condition
on
Pn
has
been
converted
= _.
can be made
of the unit
loads
and displacements
solution
to
in the form
write
the
solution
r-1
P_(_,s)
= _
Ln_m(_,s)
U_n(O,s)
m=O
(A3)
r-i
U_(_,s)
= _
Vn_m(_,s
) I_(O,s)
m=O
from
which
the
following
equations
are
obtained
r-i
0=_+ 1
L*_m(O,
m=0
s ) Urn(O, s )
(0 <= n
<= r
i)
(A4)
14
and
from
formed
which
load
in
the
unknown
the
first
_(0,
intact
S)
be
can
filament
determined.
Also,
the
broken
trans-
is
r-i
P*(0, s)
= F +
Lr_m(0,
s)
U*(0,
s)
m=0
The
transform
filaments
As
of
is
the
set
before,
stress-concentration
equal
to
L_(_,s)
this
transformed
-_n
for
factor
(_,s)
load.
where
V*(_,s)
satisfies
(A6)
the
conditions
v_(o,s)
=1
(n
Vn(O , s)
(n
_ O)
0)
(A7)
_n (_,s)= 0
In
order
to
solve
these
equations,
let
0O
(AS)
_(_,s,e)
Vn(_'s)
e-ine
n=or,
inversely,
v_(_,s)=
Then
equations
summing,
,,:
(A6)
'/ _i
'.
.<
and
!2=
/_
v-'_(_,,s,e)
(Ag)
einede
-/[
(A7) become,
after
multiplying
by
e -in8
and
"
'
i:
i' ,_ _
15
_2V*
(4
sin 2 e + s2)_-_
= o
_2
(_o)
%'_(0, s, e) = l
_v (oo,s,e)
The
solution
for
_>0
L
1
_5
0
is
V*=e
which
= o
-_4sin 2 e+s2
2
_
(All)
yields
_i/4sin 2 8
:Vn( _,s)
1
or,
cos nee
'
_ +
de
(AZ2)
finally
Ln(O,s ) -
the
70
s2
fo
_ I
1
x
cos ne
4 sin 2 _e + s2 de
Solving equations
(A4) and substituting
into
transform
of the stress-concentration
factor.
stringers,
this
procedure
(AI3)
equation
(A5) gives
For l, 2, and 3 broken
yields
Lq[
(A_4b)
_(s) : _
-_
L0
where,
for brevity,
is omitted.
the
functional
....
-_
+ LoL 2 - 2L I
dependence
indicated
1
in equation
(AI3)
,i
16
take
The
task
the
inverse
requires
Ln
remains
evaluate
transform
integration
in
therefore,
of
and,
necessary.
Such
(Actually,
with
to
of
the
L_(0, s)
each
complex
as
study
can
be
of
shows
s-plane;
in
function
equations
functions
that
written
as
L_
of
study
the
has
terms
(AI4).
a
of
of
This
of
behavior
of
s
at
s = 2i,0.
elliptic
is
integrals
modulus
k=
These
elliptic
integrals
modulus
also
guided
the
But
the
square
root
essentially
as
need
not extend
a branch
cut
The
in
s
to
Since
Kr
have
can
be
along
no
zeros
contour
branch
points
of conformal
equation
the
(AI3)
imaginary
integral
integrand
closed
for large
values
infinity
and
L_
inversion
the
1+
have
choice
Kr(m ) =
except
around
axis
thought
of
Therefore,
made
single
between
p/7+i_
_7-i_
-2i
as
behaving
the branch
valued
by
and
cuts
placing
2i.
K*(s)eSmds
Jordan's
possibly
infinity
the
be
of
s.
can be
The form
of the
in the sequel.)
is
satisfies
around
can
at
k = i.
mapping
used
on
on
branch
lemma
the
the
and
branch
left-hand
cut.
the
cut,
side
denominators
the
and
of
integral
shrunk
path
to
the
Thus,
F_
Kr(m)
A
so
to
variable
points
complete
and
inversion
the
complex
branch
closed-form
that
suitable
series
is
as
evaluation
evaluation
1
2-_
of
is
_
_C
*
Kr(s)eSmds
this
integral
desirable.
One
is
probably
method
impossible
which
is
very
follows:
Let
S
This maps
the entire
of the unit
circle.
1
Z
s-plane
outside
the
The counterclockwise
branch
cut into
contour
around
the
the
interior
branch
2A
17
cut
maps
into
clockwise
contour
just
inside
the
unit
circle.
Furthermore,
.
Ln(0, z)
which
the
is
unit
expandable
circle.
in
J0
_l
cos
a power
2z2cos
n0
series
e +
z4
in
d0
that
is
convergent
inside
Thus,
L
1
....
z2)
k=O
where
is
the
binomial
Making
number.
the
change
of
variable
Kr(T ) =
The
at
integrand
the
has
origin
no
which
zeroeth
power
singularities
i_' an
of
in
the
series
for
and
(A14).
It
negative
If
even
the
bracketed
involves
po_ers
in
the
expansion
Z2
__ i
can
be
positive
i _
(A_8)
integration
except
-7
of
The
determined
of
powers
the
value
of
Kr(_)
other
from
of
z.
part
equations
So
must
only
be
(A17)
the
sought.
eo
Cn zn
n=-oo
path
dz
of
even
expansion
the
singularity.
Z - i)
z
2 z2+l
7e
residue
of the integrand
at
z = 0.
involves
finding
the coefficient
of
part
only
_+ 1
within
by the
residue
_Sg]
The
essential
is therefore
given
simply
The determination
of this
the
gives
(AI9)
18
there results
CO = -i
C n = J0(2T) + 2J2(2T)+ + 2Jn_2(2T
) + Jn(2T) - i
(n = 2,4,6,
.)
where
Jn
Proper
plotted
in
quite
is
the
Bessel
function
of
manipulation
and evaluation
figure
2.
Good
convergence
accurate.
the
first
kind.
of the series
gives
the results
is obtained
and the results
are
L
i
5
0
2
19
APPENDIX
The
DYNAMIC
BEHAVIOR
required
stress
OF A SUDDENLY
distribution
SLI_I_ED STRINGER
SHEET
can be written
_U
= 1 + 8x
where
satisfies
the
following
dimensionless
V2u-
i_2
(B1)
boundary-value
problem
82u
(B2)
8T 2
u(x,y,O)= _u (x,y,o)= o
_T
(BS)
_--_
(o,y,T)=-i
_x
Also,
running
is regular
from
y = -i
everywhere
to
y = 1
in the x,y
plane
and approaches
except
zero
on the
slit
at infinity.
2O
The
and
actual
only
shows
is of
the
detailed
resulting
that
the
the form
analysis
by
formulas
stress
at
the
of
Eward's
interest
y-axis
in
the
method
are
is
somewhat
given
here.
neighborhood
of
tedious
The
the
analysis
tip
_ c(T__)
+ o(1)
where
C(T)
is
the
strength
of
the
singularity
(s4)
and
is
2
C(T)
= i
given
by
(o < I- < 2)
=:
(BS)
c(_)
where
K
ond kind
_2
and
with
and
the
The
quantity
E
are
modulus
primes
refer
is
complete
to
elliptic
functions
determined
of
from
snv
is
function.
Jacobi's
elliptic
(See ref.
2.)
the
the
integrals
of
the
first
and
sec-
comodulus
equation
= IT+ 2T
sine.
Finally,
snv
where
zeta
(2 < i- < 4)
Z(v)
is
Jacobi's
The results
are plotted
in figure
3.
As can be seen,
the maximum
value
of
C
is reached
at
T = 2.
The asymptotic
value
for large
T
is obtained
from
the solution
of the
static
problem:
V2u
=0
bu
(O,y,T) =-1
(-I
< y < l)
__'ii_i
I_
?r1i _::_L_
,,_-
p i I
_i
,_ _ _.i,r
21
r_ i_
9< q
_,i
_
The
solution
can be
seen
to be
:
whence
the
stress
+l-
x)
is
(x + iy)2 +
' L
In particular,
_
the
stress
at the y-axis
is
(_(O,y) = 0
(lyl< i)
_(O,y):
so that
c(_):
(y>l)
22
APPENDIX
STRESS
The stress
x-direction
at
CONCENTRATIONS
IN
STRINGER
SHEET
in an infinite
stringer
sheet
with
infinity
and with
a suddenly
induced
WITH
HOLE
uniform
stress
in the
hole
can be written
_U
- 8x
(Cl)
i
i
where
satisfies
0
2
272u - 82u
and
the
following
initial
conditions
u(x,y,O)
= x
5u (x,y,O) = 0
8T
and
at
boundary
the
(c3)
conditions
boundary
of
the
hole:
_u : o
(c4a)
_n
and
at
infinity:
_U
(c4b)
-- -_i
5x
These
equations
stresses
around
cular
hole.
an
are
solved
elliptical
in
hole
Static
For
the
first
case_
the
sequel
and
the
for
dynamic
Problem
let
x +
iy
c cosh(_
i_)
two
cases:
stresses
the
around
static
a
cir-
23
hen
the
olli(x)
2se
Iv\
The
differential
(bl
equation
= 1
and
L
1
maps
into
cosh
qD0
= a
sinh
_0
= b
boundary
82u
conditions
82u
where
= _0
become
5
0
2
_u(_o,_')
:o
u(m,_)
This
problem
has
the
c e_cos
(_ >>q)o;
solution
u(_,_) -
a-
(a
cosh
sinh
_)cos
Therefore,
1
a-
The
hole
maximum
on
the
stress
occurs
y-axis)
and
a-
at
cosh _ sinh.qD_
oos_
oos_/
= _,
= _0
(at
the
boundary
of
the
is
=i+
ba
As derived,
this
result
tion
for
a _ b
yields
tration
factor
is
is valid
the same
Ke
where
e
ellipse.
is
the
ratio
of
the
only
for
result.
= 1 +
transverse
> b
Therefore,
But
the
similar
stress
derivaconcen-
(C5)
and
longitudinal
axes
of
the
24
Dynamic
For
and
the
take
dynamic
the
problem
Laplace
boundary-value
with
transform
problem
Problem
circular
hole
= r
cos
@_
= r
sin
in
time.
of
unit
radius,
let
(C6)
(See
appendix
s2u *
= -sr
The
A.)
following
results
_+
8r2
T_-
cos
(c7)
r2 8e2
(c8)
u*(r,e,s) ~
r cos
(r >>
l)
The
solution
is
(C9)
_ere
KI
prime
is
denotes
The
the
modified
Bessel
iIs Kl(S
Kl(Sr)
)'
function
of
the
second
kind
and
differentiation.
transform
of
the
stress
at
= O,
= i
is
_/l__sh = ! _ ! Kl(S)
"/_2
s s2 Ki(s)
The
stress-concentration
equation
(ClO).
factor
The
by
integrand
placing
is
given
by
(Cl0)
the
inverse
KI(S)
eSTds
transform
of
Thus,
Kc(T)
valued
the
has
y+i_
(ell)
a branch
cut
point
along
at
the
= 0
negative
and
can
real
be
axis.
made
The
single
....
: ?< k % i!_ _
25
integrand
plane
also
which
dues
at
into
the
has
two
arise
poles
from
the
located
zeros
these
poles,
the
integration
path
around
the
branch
rewritten
in
real
form
to
sOT
Kc(T) = 2-
in
K_.
By
taking
path
in
equation
the
left-hand
account
of
(CII)
cut.
This
latter
after
some
manipulation
can
integral
half-
the
resi-
be
can
warped
then
be
s0 T
.e
i +
+ Jo
yield
symmetrically
of
s02
i +
_02
e- T_d_
_
O3
(C12 )
o(_) - _
II(_
CO
!
where
are
sO
and
modified
the
s0
Bessel
value
of
zeros
of
KI/2,
by
the
(conjugate)
functions
The
refined
are
means
sO
was
K3/2,
of
of
the
found
zeros
first
of
2"
The
the
Newton
iteration
The
result
is
I0
and
and
II
kind.
approximately
and
Kl(S),
by
interpolation
approximate
method
by
value
using
the
by
was
using
then
series
expansion
for
K I.
sO
The
making
integral
the
in
= -0.64355
equation
(C12)
0.50118i
was
evaluated
numerically
after
substitution
V
Ten
intervals
in
the
range
are
accurate
0 <
--- e
-2m
v <
were
used
together
with
Simpson's
rule.
The
results
stress-concentration
ratios
forming
a term-by-term
the right-hand
side of
mation
except
for
inversion
equation
for
these
of the
(CI0).
smallest
values
values
were
of
obtained
T.
The
by
per-
asymptotic-series
expansion
of
The resulting
small-time
approxi-
is
T2
_c(T) = 1 + T - "4
The
the
small
results
are
plotted
in
figure
4.
T3
48 + "
(T << l)
(ClS)
26
REFERENCES
i. Eward,
John C.:
cal Aerodynamics
Rep. 951, 1950.
2. Milne-Thomson,
L. M.:
Jacobian
lications,
Inc., 1950.
Elliptic
Function
Tables.
Dover
Pub-
P
0
8ci
<
_n
%uawDli3
_L
_1
OI
_'0
O'i
d_
l-=d
_'I
0"8
cO
OJ
ep_w
Oh
OJ
Xluappns
s! %!IS
0
oo
I
_'0
enlo^
o!%o$S
aTo__-Lmo_Ta
pa_OT.m._
OJ
0
8
I
9
I
?
I
_
I
0
I
_'0
0"I
0"_
NASA TN D-882
National
Aeronautics
and Space Administration.
STRESS CONCENTRATIONS
IN FILAMENTARY
STRUCTURES.
John M. Hedgepeth.
May 1961.
30p.
OTS price,
$0.75.
(NASA TECHNICAL
NOTE
I.
II.
Hedgepeth,
John Mills
NASA TN D-882
(Initial
NASA distrib utin:_
51, Stresses
and toads;
52, Structures.)
D-882)
NASA TN D-882
National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
STRESS CONCENTRATIONS
IN FILAMENTARY
STRUCTURES.
John M. Hedgepeth.
May 1961.
30p.
OTS price,
$0.75.
(NASA TECHNICAL
NOTE
I.
II.
Hedgepeth,
John Mills
NASA TN D-882
(Initial
NASA distribution:`
51, Stresses and toads;
52, Structures.)
D-882)
Theoretical
analyses
are made of the stress
distributions in a sheet of parallel
filaments
which carry
normal
loads and are imbedded
in a matrix
which
carries
only shear.
In all cases,
uniform
loading at
infinity
is assumed
and small-deflection
elasticity
theory is used.
Static and dynamic
stressconcentration
factors
due to one or more filaments
being broken
are determined.
Particular
attention
is
paid the dynamic
overshoot
resulting
when the filaments are suddenly
broken.
Theoretical
analyses
are made of the stress
distributions in a sheet of parallel
filaments
which carry
normal
loads and are imbedded in a matrix
which
carries
only shear.
In all cases,
uniform
loading
at
infinity
is assumed
and small-deflection
elasticity
theory.is
used.
Static and dynamic stressconcentration
factors
due to one or more filaments
being broken are determined,
particular
attention is
paid the dynamic overshoot
resulting
when the filaments are suddenly broken.
NASA
NASA
NASA TN D-882
National
Aeronautics
and Space Administration.
STRESS CONCENTRATIONS
IN FILAMENTARY
STRUCTURES.
John M. Hedgepeth.
May 1961.
30p.
OTS price,
$0.75.
(NASA TECHNICAL
NOTE
I.
II.
Hedgepeth,
John Mills
NASA TN D-882
D-882)
NASA TN D-882
National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
STRESS CONCENTRATIONS
IN FILAMENTARY
STRUCTURES.
John M. I-ledgepeth. May 1961.
30p. OTS price, $0.75.
(NASA TECHNICAL
NOTE
I.
II.
Hedgepeth,
John
NASA TN D-882
D-882)
Theoretical analyses are made of the stress distributions in a sheet of parallelfilaments which carry
normal loads and are imbedded in a matrix which
carries only shear. In allcases, uniform loading at
infinityis assumed and small-deflection elasticity
theory is used. Staticand dynamic stressconcentrationfactors due to one or more filaments
being broken are determined. Particular attentionis
19aidthe dynamic overshoot resultingwhen the filaments are suddenly broken.
Theoretical
analyses
are made of the stress
distributions in a sheet of parallel
filaments
which carry
normal loads and are imbedded
in a matrix
which
carries
only shear.
In all cases,
uniform loading
at
infinity is assumed
and small-deflection
elasticity
theory is used.
Static and dynamic stressconcentration
factors
due to one or more filaments
being broken are determined,
particular
attention is
paid the dynamic
overshoot
resulting
when the filaments are suddenly broken.
NASA
NASA
Milts