Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.orientjchem.org
INTRODUCTION
The Aqueous effluents emanating from
various natural and industrial sources contain heavy
metals dissolved in it. The hazardous impact of
heavy metals in waste stream has generated
considerable concern in recent years. Primarily,
some manmade factors such as unplanned
urbanization, deforestation, industrialization along
with anthropogenic activities, such as weathering
of rocks and volcanic activities are the major
406
...(1)
Where,
q e = adsorption amount of metal ion (mg/g) at
equilibrium contact time
407
...(2)
408
C0
qe (exp)
(mg/l)
50
60
70
80
90
100
8.3125
9.8050
10.550
11.505
12.3025
13.3050
7.6559
13.964
11.246
10.069
6.6374
7.2778
0.0392
0.0369
0.0322
0.0392
0.0276
0.0345
R2
(min-1)
0.945
0.947
0.979
0.969
0.980
0.972
9.8039
12.346
12.500
12.500
12.987
14.085
0.0044
0.0022
0.0030
0.0070
0.0084
0.0092
0.983
0.983
0.993
0.998
0.998
0.999
1.975
1.049
2.044
5.400
7.027
8.080
Type of Isotherm
RL > 1
RL= 1
0 < RL < 1
RL= 1
Unfavourable
Linear
Favourable
Irreversible
Kdif(mg/gh0.5)
Correlation
coefficient,R2
4.502
5.899
5.797
4.214
3.507
3.562
0.765
0.898
0.882
0.850
0.919
0.884
Parameters
values
R2
Langmuir
qm ,maximum monolayer
adsorption capacities(mg/g)
RL, separation factor
KL, Langmuir constant
KF,Affinity
Factor(mg/gm(L/mg)1/n)
1/n, Freundlich exponent
A, (l/mg)
B
19.2307
0.1801
0.0455
0.993
2.604
0.978
0.422
0.3924
4.492
0.981
Freundlich
Temkin
Fig. 1: The FTIR spectra of activated and natural oil palm ash
Fig. 2: Effect of initial Mn (II) ion concentration with equilibrium contact time
409
410
...(3)
...(4)
11
kq2eorder
q 2e
as slope and
t
qt
versus t gave
411
Fig. 4: Plots for Pseudo First Order Kinetics of Mn (II) ion solution onto activated OPA at pH 5.5
Fig. 5: Plots for Pseudo Second Order Kinetics of Mn (II) ion solution onto activated OPA at pH 5.5
Fig. 6: Plots for Intra- Particle Diffusion of Mn (II) ion solution onto activated OPA at pH 5.5
412
...(5)
The linear plots of qt versus t0.5 is shown
by Fig. 6. The slope of the plot has been defined to
give the intraparticle diffusion parameter kid (mgg-1
min-0.5). On the other hand, the intercept of the plot
yields C, the boundary layer effect. The larger the
intercept observed, the greater will be the
contribution of the surface sorption in the ratecontrolling step.
From the plot it is observed that the lines
did not pass through the origin. This indicated that
the rate limiting process is not only governed by
intra particle diffusion. Some other mechanism
along with intraparticle diffusion was involved 30.
The Langmuir isotherm predicts monolayer
adsorption for the adsorbate assuming constant
heat of adsorption for all sites on the active sites of
the adsorbent and it is expressed by following
equation31:
qmax =
KL =
(mg/l),
The maximum monolayer adsorption
capacity of the adsorbent (mg/g),
The Langmuir adsorption constant (l/mg).
RL =
1
1 + K L Co
...(8)
...(9)
...(6)
And can be linearized as:
The linear form of the Langmuir isotherm
is given by:
Ce
1
1
Ce
=
+
qe qmax K L qmax
ln
= ln
+ ln
...(10)
...(7)
Where,
qe =
Equilibrium cation concentration on the
adsorbent (mg/g),
Ce =
Equilibrium cation concentration in solution
1/n
= Intensity of adsorption. The linear
plot of Freundlich Isotherm at 30C temperature is
given on Fig. 8 and the model parameters at 30C
are listed in Table 4.
413
414
...(11)
...(12)
Here,
RT/b
A (L/g)
R (8.314 J/mol k)
T (K)
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
415
41 (2009).
Saifuddin, N. and Fazlili S.A., Am. J. Eng. &
Applied Sci., 2(1): 139 (2009).
Ahmad A., Rafatullah M., Sulaiman O.,
Ibrahim M.H., Chee Y.Y. and Siddique B.M.,
Desalination, 247: 636, (2009).
Ho Y.S. and McKay G., Process Biochemistry,
34(5): 451 (1999a).
Ho Y.S. and McKay G., Water Research,
33(2): 578, (199b).
Wong K.K., Lee C.K., Low K. S. and Haron
M.J., Chemosphere, 50: 23 (2003)
Weber W.J. and Morris J.C., In: Proc. Int.
Conf. Water pollution symposium, 2:
Pergamon, Oxford, (1962), 231 (1962).
Weber W.J. and Morris J.C., J. Sanit. Eng.
Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 89: 31 (1963).
Langmuir I., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38: 2221
(1916).
Freundlich H.M.F., J. Phys. Chem. 57A: 385
(1906).
Temkin M.I., and Pyzhev V., Jour. Phys.
Chem. (U.S.S.R.), 13: 851 (1939).