Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v. : Filed: 10/7/02
Defendant. :
-------------------------------x
INFORMATION
below.
treasurer of a graphic services company (“GS-1”). She was in charge of the billing and estimating
departments at GS-1 and was, in part, responsible for servicing one of its clients, Grey Global
Group, Inc. or its predecessors or affiliates, including Grey Advertising, Inc. (collectively “Grey”).
3. GS-1, a company located in Queens, New York, was a supplier of graphic services,
public relations, and media services. Grey was one of the largest advertising agencies in the world,
with as many as 12,000 employees and offices in 90 countries. Grey, which had approximately $8.3
billion in billings in 2000, had a client roster that included major consumer brand companies such
as Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., The Procter & Gamble Co., GlaxoSmithKline p.l.c., Mars
Inc., Hasbro, Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., 3M Co., and Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.
5. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (“B&W”) marketed tobacco products. B&W,
the third largest cigarette manufacturer and marketer in the United States, was headquartered in
Louisville, Kentucky. B&W was a subsidiary of British American Tobacco p.l.c. It had
approximately 5,000 employees. B&W’s principal brands were Kool, Lucky Strike, Carlton, Kent,
6. The Color Wheel, Inc., a company located in Manhattan, New York, was a supplier
of graphic services, including retouching and separation services, to Grey. The Color Wheel, Inc.
was wholly owned by Haluk K. Ergulec. In 1999, The Color Wheel, Inc. merged with two other
companies also wholly owned by Haluk K. Ergulec, Manhattan Color Graphics, Inc., and A2, Inc.,
with The Color Wheel, Inc. being the surviving corporate entity. Manhattan Color Graphics, Inc.,
A2, Inc., and the pre- and post-merger The Color Wheel, Inc. are hereinafter collectively referred
to as “Color Wheel.”
co-conspirators in the offense charged herein and performed acts and made statements in furtherance
thereof. They included Gabriel Casas, a salesperson representing Color Wheel; a Color Wheel
executive; Mitchell Mosallem (“Mosallem”), an executive vice president and director of graphic
services at Grey; John F. Steinmetz, a vice president and associate director of graphic services at
Grey; John Ghianni (“Ghianni”), an independent salesperson for GS-1; another salesperson for GS-
2
1; James Rattoballi, a part-owner of a graphic services company and a broker for other graphic
services companies; a Grey employee whose primary responsibility was overseeing prepress services
and printing; and other individuals representing certain graphics services companies.
II. DEFINITIONS
digital image to achieve an aesthetically desired result. The process employs a range of image
processing tools which can be used to compose, change, and improve any type of image.
III. BACKGROUND
10. On approximately July 1, 1994, B&W retained Grey as its agent to provide
advertising and marketing services on behalf of its various brands. The agreement between B&W
and Grey and all succeeding agreements (hereinafter collectively “the agreement”) stated that Grey
owed the highest fiduciary duties to B&W, and obliged Grey to exert its best efforts and apply its
11. As part of the agreement, Grey, acting on B&W’s behalf, procured various goods and
services from third parties. These goods and services included retouching and separation services
from graphics companies. To ensure that B&W received the best value on purchases made on its
behalf by Grey, the agreement between B&W and Grey required that Grey obtain at least three
competitive bids before entering into any single contract for goods or services in excess of $25,000,
and at least once a year to obtain competitive bids for any other goods or services purchased on
B&W’s behalf.
3
IV. TRADE AND COMMERCE
12. From approximately late 1994 until approximately 2001, pursuant to contracts that
are the subject of this Information, B&W, through its agency Grey, purchased substantial quantities
of retouching and separation services from members of the conspiracy. Materials and equipment
were transported across state lines for use in performing some of the aforementioned retouching and
separation services.
13. During the period covered by this Information, the defendant and certain of the
advertisements completed pursuant to contracts that are the subject of this Information, which were
thereafter shipped across state lines in a continuous and uninterrupted flow of interstate commerce
for inclusion in magazines and other media manufactured and produced outside the State of New
York. These magazines and other media were also shipped across state lines in a continuous and
uninterrupted flow of interstate commerce from their places of manufacture to customers located
14. The activities of the defendant and certain of the co-conspirators with respect to the
sale of retouching and separation services to B&W, purchased through its agency Grey, including
the sale of retouching and separation services pursuant to contracts that are the subject of this
Information, were within the flow of, and substantially affected, interstate trade and commerce.
15. From approximately late 1994 until approximately 2001, the exact dates being
unknown to the United States, the defendant and co-conspirators engaged in a combination and
4
the Sherman Act (Title 15, United States Code, Section 1).
understanding, and concert of action among the defendant and co-conspirators, the substantial terms
of which were to rig bids and allocate contracts for the supply of retouching and separation services
17. For the purpose of forming and effectuating the aforesaid combination and
conspiracy, the defendant and co-conspirators did those things which they combined and conspired
(a) Co-conspirators designated in advance that Color Wheel would be the low bidder,
among the co-conspirators, on contracts to supply retouching services, and that another graphic
services company would be the low bidder on contracts to supply separation services on behalf of
B&W brands;
(b) Defendant and co-conspirators discussed and agreed on the prices that would be
bid on contracts to supply retouching and on contracts to supply separation services on behalf of
high, noncompetitive bids (i.e., “cover” bids) on contracts to supply retouching and separation
services on behalf of B&W brands, with the understanding that certain of these graphics supply
companies would be allowed to submit bids for, and under certain circumstances allocated contracts
to supply, various graphic services in connection with advertising for other Grey clients. The
intentionally high bids relating to work Grey procured for B&W were submitted in order to make
it appear to B&W that there had been competition for its contracts when, in fact, there had not.
5
VI. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
18. The aforesaid combination and conspiracy was formed and carried out, in part, within
the Southern District of New York within the five years preceding the filing of this Information.
Dated:
/s/_________________________________ /s/________________________________
CHARLES A. JAMES RALPH T. GIORDANO
Assistant Attorney General Chief, New York Office
/s/ /s/
JAMES M. GRIFFIN REBECCA MEIKLEJOHN
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
/s/ /s/
SCOTT D. HAMMOND DOUGLAS M. TWEEN
Director of Criminal Enforcement