Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TUTORIAL REVIEW
nanoparticles with precisely tailored physical parameters are barely reported. In this tutorial review, we
DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35289c
take the synthesis of dierent Ag nanoparticles as an example to rule out the general principles for
controlling the nucleation process involved in the formation of colloidal Ag nanoparticles in organic
solutions, which enables the synthesis of high-quality nanoparticles.
www.rsc.org/csr
1. Introduction
Silver (Ag) is a ductile, malleable coinage metal that exhibits the
highest electrical and thermal conductivity among all metals
Center for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass
Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA. E-mail: ygsun@anl.gov
Part of the chemistry of functional nanomaterials themed issue.
This journal is
2497
Tutorial Review
industry as conductive fillers in conductive adhesives14 and thermal
interfacial materials.15 Most recently, two-dimensional (2D)
random networks of Ag nanowires have been exploited to
serve as transparent conductive films due to the fact that the
low percolation threshold for Ag nanowires assures a high
percentage of open areas in the conductive networks.16 In
combination with the thin diameters of Ag nanowires that are
responsible for the mechanical flexibility of the nanowires,
such 2D networks are very promising to replace the traditional
rigid doped metal oxide conductive films, such as the most
commonly used tin-doped indium oxide (ITO).17
In addition to these commercial applications, Ag nanoparticles also represent an important class of optical materials
related to a recent hot research field, i.e., plasmonics.18 Ag
nanoparticles exhibit strong surface plasmon resonances
(SPRs) under illumination of light due to strong coherent
oscillation of free surface electrons in the nanoparticles, resulting
in strong absorption and scattering of incident light. As a consequence, dispersions of Ag nanoparticles always exhibit a colorful
appearance. The evanescent electrical fields near the surface of an
Ag nanoparticle are usually very high, providing hot spots to
enhance Raman scattering1923 and fluorescence24 of molecules or
emitters (such as quantum dots and upconversion nanocrystals)
adjacent to the Ag nanoparticle. The unique SPRs in Ag nanoparticles can benefit their traditional use such as in catalytic
oxidation reactions (e.g., ethylene epoxidation, CO oxidation, and
NH2 oxidation) because excitation of SPRs on the surfaces of the
Ag nanoparticles can form energetic electrons that are transferrable to chemical species adsorbed on the nanoparticle surfaces.25
For example, in the commercially important partial oxidation of
ethylene to form ethylene oxide O2-dissociation represents the ratelimiting elementary step that requires a large thermal energy
(corresponding to a high temperature) to drive this reaction.
Illumination of the Ag nanoparticles can excite plasmons on the
Ag surface to populate O2 antibonding orbitals and so form a
transient negatively ionic state, which thereby facilitates the ratelimiting O2-dissociation reaction. As a result, the thermal energy
and temperature can be lowered to drive this oxidation reaction,
leading to an increase in energy eciency and long-term stability
of catalysts and product selectivity. These results imply that
continuous study of the unique properties of Ag nanoparticles
can help us exploit their novel applications.
Intensive studies in the past decade clearly show that the
physical parameters including size, shape, surface coating, and
surrounding environment of an Ag nanoparticle strongly influence its properties and thus its performance in applications.
For example, unpromoted, Ag3 clusters and B3.5 nm Ag
nanoparticles on alumina supports can catalyze the direct
propylene epoxidation by O2 to selectively form propylene oxide
with high activity at low temperatures.26 In contrast, using
commercial industrial catalysts containing non-selected Ag
nanoparticles the reaction selectivity and activity at low temperatures
dramatically decreased. In another example, cubic Ag nanoparticles
bounded with {100} facets exhibit much higher catalytic capability
toward oxidation of styrene with tert-butyl hydroperoxide than
Ag nanoplates mainly bounded with {111} facets,27 indicating
2498
This journal is
form nuclei. Once stable nuclei are formed, they can grow larger at
a lower concentration of Ag0 that is slightly above Cs because this
process is a less energy-consuming process or an energy-saving
process. As a result, the nucleation and growth steps are two
relatively separated processes: formation of nuclei occurs only at a
concentration of Ag0 much higher than Cs, otherwise growing
the existing nuclei dominates. Therefore the two individual steps
(i.e., nucleation and growth) can be reasonably engineered by
tuning the concentration of Ag0, leading to a controlled synthesis
of Ag nanoparticles with appropriate parameters.
Intensive studies on the synthesis of colloidal nanoparticles
have proven that nucleation is critical to determine the properties
of the final nanoparticles. Crystal nucleation can be considered
as a chemical reaction that takes solvated precursor atoms or
molecules (e.g., Ag0 for the synthesis of Ag nanoparticles) into a
solid-state crystalline product. As a chemical reaction, one can
understand the nucleation process from both thermodynamic and
kinetic aspects. In the classical nucleation theory (Fig. 1b), the
driving force for spontaneous phase transition is the exothermicity
of lattice formation. In this thermodynamic aspect, the free energy
change required for the formation of nuclei (DG) is determined by
This journal is
Tutorial Review
the sum of the free energy change for the phase transformation
(DGv) and the free energy change for the formation of a solid
surface (DGs). As the solid-state crystals are more stable than the
solvated precursors, DGv is negative to decrease the total Gibbs free
energy of the system. In contrast, the introduction of solid/liquid
interfaces generally increases the free energy with the increase in
the surface area of the nuclei. As a result, the evolution of nuclei
depends on the competition between a decrease in DGv, which
favors condensation of solvated precursors into nuclei, and an
increase in DGs, which destabilizes the nuclei toward solvation in
proportion to the crystals surface area. When the radii (R) of the
nuclei are very small, the positive surface free energy DGs term
dominates the total free energy change, leading the small nuclei to
be dissolved. When the size of the nuclei increases, the total free
energy change reaches a maximum (DG*) at a critical size (R*)
and then turns over and continuously decreases to favor the
stabilization and growth of the nuclei. From this thermodynamic
aspect, one can change the pathway for the formation of nuclei by
modulating the function of surface free energy and/or volume free
energy to change the dependence of the total free energy on the
size of the nuclei. As a result, controlling the nucleation process for
the synthesis of colloidal Ag nanoparticles can be realized through
the possible strategies: (i) varying surfactants that can change the
surface free energy of Ag nuclei; (ii) forming nuclei of dierent
materials that exhibit DGv and DGs dierent from Ag nuclei,
followed by their chemical transformation to Ag nuclei; (iii)
changing the reaction environment that can influence the stability
of the nuclei, such as etching and dissolving the nuclei.
According to the Arrhenius reaction rate equation, kinetics
of the nucleation reaction can be described by the steady-state
rate of nucleation, J A exp DG
kT , which equals the number
of nuclei formed per unit time per unit volume. In this
equation, k is the Boltzmanns constant and A is the preexponential factor. The theoretical value of the pre-exponential
factor is given as 1030 cm3 s1 although the value is very
dicult to measure in practice.37 This kinetic factor depends
on the mobility of precursor species (e.g., Ag0 for the synthesis
of Ag nanoparticles) that can influence the rate of attachment
of the precursor species to the critical nuclei. Since the mobility
of precursor species varies rapidly with temperature, the temperature dependence of the pre-exponential factor can be quite
significant. In addition, variation of temperature also changes
the value of the exponential term. As a result, from the kinetic
aspect we can change reaction temperature to influence the
kinetics of the nuclei formation. The value of DG* also plays an
important role in determining the nucleation kinetics. As
discussed in the previous paragraph, this thermodynamic
energy diagram can be tuned by controlling the chemical
environment of the synthetic reactions. As a consequence, the
nucleation kinetics can be tuned to control the synthesis of Ag
nanoparticles.
The classical nucleation theory indicates that supersaturated precursor species spontaneously condense into nuclei
with critical sizes (this is called self-nucleation) followed by
gradually enlarging the nuclei with continuous addition of
precursor species (Fig. 1a). However, recent studies using the
2499
Tutorial Review
2500
This journal is
This journal is
Tutorial Review
Fig. 3 (a) Schematic drawings and (be) HRTEM images of the individual Ag
nanoparticles shown in Fig. 2 viewed along dierent rotational axes: (left) twofold,
(middle) threefold, and (right) fivefold ones, revealing their icosahedral morphology. The red dashed lines in (a) highlight the twin planes corresponding to these
symmetries. The diameters of the nanoparticles shown in (be) are (b) 5.3 nm, (c)
7.3 nm, (d) 10.0 nm, and (e) 15.6 nm, respectively. Insets on the bottom left of the
images presented in (b, c) are the fast Fourier transforms (FTTs) of the corresponding HRTEM images showing the nanoparticles symmetries. Scale bars in (b),
(c), (d), and (e) represent 4, 5, 5, and 10 nm, respectively, and apply to all the
images in the corresponding rows. Reproduced with permission from ref. 47.
2501
Tutorial Review
2502
This journal is
Tutorial Review
quick and most of the Ag+ ions are reduced within several
seconds (period I). The peak areas of both Ag and AgCl exhibit
plateaus in the period II while their particle sizes slightly
increase, indicating that Ostwald ripening processes occur. Only
when the reaction time is long enough, i.e., at B60 seconds,
AgCl nanoparticles start to be reduced and transformed into
single-crystal Ag nanoparticles in the period III. During this
phase transition process, the reaction rate follows the Avrami
phase-boundary based nuclei growth model in a 3D fashion.52,53
The Avrami exponent is determined to be B4, indicating the
nucleation process with a constant nucleation rate. The size of
the AgCl nanoparticles calculated from the XRD patterns
remains essentially constant during this period, indicating that
once the phase transition of an AgCl nanoparticle is initiated it
can be quickly reduced to pure Ag before the phase transition of
another AgCl nanoparticle starts. This chemical transformation
process lasts B40 s. The increase in the crystalline size of Ag
during period III is ascribed to the fact that the sizes of the
single-crystal Ag nanoparticles derived from the AgCl nanoparticles are larger than the multiply twinned Ag nanoparticles
formed during period II. As more and more Ag nanoparticles
are formed through the chemical transformation of AgCl nanoparticles, the average crystalline size of Ag nanoparticles continuously increases until all of the AgCl nanoparticles are
reduced. In period IV, the mixture of single-crystal and multiply
twinned Ag particles in the reaction solution undergoes an
Ostwald ripening process. Because the multiply twinned Ag
particles exhibit smaller sizes than the single-crystal Ag particles
and contain twinning defects, continuous incubation of the
nanoparticles gradually dissolves the multiply twinned Ag particles
and drives the single-crystal Ag particles to grow into uniform Ag
cubes as shown in Fig. 4c. Apparently the time-resolved highenergy XRD studies provide more information on the complex
nucleation and growth processes involved in the synthesis of Ag
nanocubes than that obtained through the traditional sampling
strategy. Techniques with higher temporal resolutions are
expected in the future for better understanding the synthesis.
3.3. Controlled synthesis of Ag nanoparticles through
selectively etching defective nuclei
Fig. 5 Time-resolved XRD patterns recorded from the reaction solution for the
synthesis of Ag nanocubes shown in Fig. 4. (a) 2D contour plot of the XRD
patterns at dierent reaction times. The black and red sticks represent the peak
positions and relative intensities of the standard powder XRD patterns for f.c.c.
Ag and f.c.c. AgCl, respectively. Blue arrows highlight the time when the AgNO3
solution was injected to initiate the reaction. The wavelength of X-ray was
0.1771 . Data were collected on the X-ray Operations and Research beamline
1-ID at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. (b) Variation
in the integrated peak areas of the Ag(111) peak and the AgCl(200) peak as a
function of reaction time. (c) Dependence of the lateral dimensions of the
crystalline domains in the Ag nanoparticles along the {111} crystalline direction
and in the AgCl nanoparticles along the {200} direction as a function of the
reaction time. The dotted lines highlight the time periods (I, II, III, and IV) assigned
according to the important processes discussed in the text. Adapted with
permission from ref. 51.
This journal is
2503
Tutorial Review
Fig. 6 (a) Modified LaMer model describing the inclusion of an extra step for
selecting nuclei with appropriated crystal structures. (b) Schematic illustration of
the possible mechanism for the selective growth of single-crystal Ag nanoparticles (truncated cubes and tetrahedrons) through reduction of AgNO3 in
hot EG in the presence of PVP, NaCl, and oxygen. (c) TEM image of the Ag
nanoparticles formed at 44 h 10 min, showing the absence of twin planes in the
nanoparticles. (d) SEM image of the nanoparticles formed at 45 h containing
exclusively truncated cubes (indicated by a white octagon) and truncated
tetrahedrons (indicated by a white hexagon). (bd) Adapted with permission
from ref. 55.
2504
This journal is
This journal is
Tutorial Review
can be considered to be composed of five single crystalline f.c.c.
subunits sharing their {111} crystallographic facets. However,
the five subunits cannot completely fill spaces as predicted by
the simple solid geometry model, leading to the formation of a
solid-angle deficiency. This angular deficiency leads to lattice
strains and/or defects in the nanowires to fill the 7.351 gap. The
high-resolution XRD patterns indicate that the lattice strains in
the Ag nanowires induce tetragonal distortions in the f.c.c.
lattices.58 Studies on the cross-sectional samples of individual
Ag nanowires with electron microscopy and electron diraction
reveal that the lattice strains distributed non-uniformly, i.e., the
lattice strains are concentrated in the central region of each
nanowire. The HRTEM images of a thick cross-sectional sample
that essentially retains the internal lattice strains and microstructured defects are presented in Fig. 7c and d. The image of
the central region (Fig. 7c) shows that the solid-angle gaps
induce lattice defects including stacking faults, associated
partial dislocations, slips, and possible additional small crystal
domains. These defects are responsible for partially releasing
the strong internal strains to stabilize the tetragonally distorted
nanowires. In contrast, the crystalline lattices near surfaces are
essentially free of defects except the {111} twin planes (highlighted by the red arrow), indicating much less strains in the
surface regions (Fig. 7d). Cross-sectional samples of dierent
nanowires exhibit the similar morphology and microstructures,
implying that each Ag nanowire is a coreshell structure with a
highly strained core that is responsible for the tetragonal
distortion and a thin less-strained sheath that protects the
strained core. The coreshell structure is responsible for the
enhanced stability of the strained Ag nanowires and might
provide the strong driving force for their anisotropic growth.
Because the fivefold twin planes do not twist or bend during
the growth of nanowires, the coreshell geometry and microstructured defects exist throughout the entire nanowires along
their longitudinal axes. As a result, the defects that represent
the most active sites for the addition of Ag atoms during
nanowire growth can be exposed only at the ends of the
nanowires (Fig. 7e). In contrast, the less-strained side surfaces
of the nanowires have lower reactivity towards the attachment
of Ag atoms for growing them thicker. The dierent reactivity
between the end surfaces and side surfaces of the nanowires
may be responsible for anisotropic growth of the nanowires.
The examples shown in Fig. 6 and 7 highlight the importance of trace amounts of additives, e.g., NaCl and Fe(acac)3, in
the selection of stable nuclei and the final nanoparticles. The
presence of Cl ions prompts the oxidative etching of twinned
nuclei due to the higher reactivity of the twinning defects
towards oxygen than the defect-free surfaces of the singlecrystal nuclei. In the reaction systems including iron species,
the reaction between Fe(II) and oxygen species adsorbed on Ag
surfaces can eectively prevent the oxidative etching of twinned
nuclei of Ag. Similar to the high reactivity towards oxidation,
the twinning defects and other crystalline lattice defects also
exhibit higher activity for the deposition of Ag atoms during
nanoparticle growth, leading to a preferential enlargement of
twinned nuclei when both twinned nuclei and single-crystal
2505
Tutorial Review
nuclei coexist. As shown in Fig. 6b, decahedron and icosahedron represent the two typical morphologies of nanoparticles
with fivefold twinning structures. Experimental observations
and theoretical predictions indicate that icosahedral nanoparticles with large sizes (>30 nm) barely exist due to strong
three-dimensional (3D) constraints. In contrast, decahedral Ag
nanoparticles that exhibit tetragonal lattice distortions and
coreshell strain distributions58 are easily elongated along
their fivefold axes to form nanowires. The selective growth of
thermodynamically stable Ag nanowires exhibits a much faster
kinetics than the selective growth of single-crystal Ag nanoparticles, which is reflected from the dierence in reaction
times for the formation of the fivefold twinned nanowires
shown in Fig. 7b (40 min) and the single-crystal nanoparticles
shown in Fig. 6d (45 h).
3.4.
2506
This journal is
Fig. 8 (a) Modified LaMer model describing the formation of hybrid structures
through hetero-nucleation. (b) Schematic illustration showing the major steps
involved in the synthesis of hybrid nanostructures made of Ag nanodomains and
Fe/FexOy nanodomains. (c) Summary of the TEM images obtained from the
products formed through the synthetic reaction shown in (b) at dierent times
that was adjusted against the time when the AgNO3 solution was injected into
the dispersion of Fe/FexOy nanoparticles. From the left top to the bottom left
following the arrow direction, the reaction times were 0, 2, 180, and 300 s,
respectively. The sample shown in the center was the same as that shown in the
bottom left arc. The images were false colored and the scale bar applies to all the
images. (b, c) Adapted with permission from ref. 67.
This journal is
Tutorial Review
dierent from Ag and have dierent properties, the synthesized
hybrid structures can exhibit multiple functionalities.
Fig. 8b shows an example for the synthesis of magnetoplasmonic bi-functional nanoparticles consisting of magnetic
iron oxide (FexOy) nanodomains and plasmonic Ag nanodomains by using amorphous iron nanoparticles (as the preloaded foreign nanoparticles) to mediate the nucleation and
growth of Ag nanodomains on their surfaces.67 In a typical
synthesis, amorphous Fe nanoparticles with uniform sizes are
first synthesized through a thermal decomposition of Fe(CO)5
in 1-octadecene (ODE) containing OAm.68 Separating the
synthesized Fe nanoparticles from the reaction solution followed
by washing them with hexane leads to a partial oxidation of
the nanoparticles surfaces forming thin iron oxide layers that
are also amorphous. Such oxidation is ascribed to the high
reactivity of metallic Fe with the trace amount of oxygen
dissolved in hexane. Formation of the thin FexOy shells passivates the Fe nanoparticles and significantly prevents the inner
Fe cores from quick oxidation.69 Once an OAm solution of
AgNO3 is injected into a hot ODEOAm solvent containing the
amorphous Fe/FexOy nanoparticles, Ag nanodomains quickly
deposit on the surfaces of the Fe/FexOy nanoparticles because
the amorphous FexOy surfaces provide the nucleation sites for
Ag. Due to the fast reduction of Ag+ with hot OAm and the high
density of nucleation sites on the amorphous FexOy surfaces,
this heterogeneous nucleation leads to the formation of multiple Ag domains (as many as eight) on the surface of each
Fe/FexOy nanoparticle. Continuously heating the reaction
system initiates the ripening process of the Ag nanodomains
because of the high mobility of Ag atoms on the FexOy surfaces
at high temperatures, resulting in a gradual decrease in the
average number of the Ag domains on each Fe/FexOy nanoparticle. The ripening process enlarges the most stable Ag
nanodomain on a single Fe/FexOy nanoparticle by consuming
the others until a dimer is formed. During the ripening process,
the iron nanoparticles are converted to hollow iron oxide
nanoshells through a complete oxidation of the iron with
nitrate ions dissociated from AgNO3.
Fig. 8c presents a series of typical TEM images of samples
formed at dierent reaction stages, agreeing well with the
growth mechanism highlighted in Fig. 8b. These samples are
obtained by injecting AgNO3 solution (0.05 M in OAm, 2.0 mL)
into hot (180 1C) ODEOAm (10 mL/0.5 mL) in the presence of
Fe/FexOy coreshell nanoparticles with an average diameter of
14 nm (top left, Fig. 8c), followed by a continuous heating
for dierent times. Mixing the AgNO3 solution with the hot
dispersion of Fe/FexOy nanoparticles leads to an instantaneous
appearance of intense yellow color within 1 s due to the
formation of Ag nanoparticles that exhibit strong SPRs. In
contrast, it takes a much longer time (>60 s) to develop a light
yellow color from a hot ODEOAm solvent without Fe/FexOy
nanoparticles after the AgNO3 solution is injected. The significant dierence in the reaction rate for the formation of Ag
nanoparticles highlights the role of the amorphous Fe/FexOy
nanoparticles in facilitating the nucleation and growth of Ag
nanocrystals from solutions. TEM images of the sample formed
2507
Tutorial Review
Fig. 9 (a) Schematic illustration describing the synthesis of dumbbell nanostructure made of two dierent nanoparticles linked with amorphous FexOy layers. (bj)
TEM images of Au@FexOy coreshell nanoparticles (c, f, i) and Au@FexOyAg dumbbell nanoparticles (d, g, j) that were synthesized from Au nanoparticles with
dierent sizes (b, e, h). The scale bar shown in (h) applies to all the images.
2508
amorphous FexOy layers followed by decoration with Ag nanodomains through the same strategy shown in Fig. 8b. For
instance as shown in Fig. 9a, one can first form a thin layer
of amorphous FexOy around nanoparticles made of varying
materials (e.g., metal, semiconductor, oxide, etc.) through a
decomposition of Fe(CO)5 in a hot ODEOAm solution containing these nanoparticles followed by controlled post-oxidation.
In the next step, the Ag nanodomains can be grown on the
FexOy surfaces, leading to the formation of structures more
complex than those shown in Fig. 8c. Fig. 9bj show the
formation of hybrid structures containing both Au and Ag
nanodomains that are separated by the amorphous FexOy
layers.
3.6.
This journal is
This journal is
Tutorial Review
The understanding will in turn help us better design and synthesize
high-quality nanoparticles. Environmental transmission electron
microscopy with specially designed thin liquid cells70 and timeresolved synchrotron X-ray techniques (e.g., transmission X-ray
microscopy,71 wide-angle X-ray scattering,72 small-angle X-ray scattering,38 X-ray absorption fine structure,73 etc.) represent the major
advances emerged in the past several years.
The synthesized Ag nanoparticles with well-controlled parameters can be used as a class of physical templates to direct the
deposition of other materials on the surfaces of the Ag nanoparticles to form coreshell nanoparticles with multiple compositions and functionalities. The Ag nanoparticles can also
serve as chemical templates to react with appropriate reagents
to transform the Ag nanoparticles into nanoparticles made of
dierent materials while the resulting nanoparticles can inherit
the morphology and/or crystallinity of the Ag nanoparticles. For
example, galvanic replacement reactions between the Ag nanoparticles and precursors of more noble metals (e.g., Au, Pt, Pd)
result in the formation of hollow metal nanoparticles.74 Reaction with appropriate oxidizing reagents (e.g., S, FeCl3, etc.) can
transform the Ag nanoparticles into semiconductor nanoparticles (e.g., Ag2S, AgCl, etc.).75 Assembly of the synthesized
Ag nanoparticles and the derived nanoparticles through templated transformations into complex superlattices represents
another interesting direction for developing functional materials because coupling between neighboring nanoparticles may
lead to novel properties and applications.76
Acknowledgements
This work was performed at the Center for Nanoscale Materials,
a U.S. Department of Energy, Oce of Science, Oce of Basic
Energy Sciences User Facility under Contract No. DE-AC0206CH11357. Data discussed in this review were partially
obtained with the use of Advanced Photon Source and Electron
Microscopy Center for Materials Research at Argonne National
Laboratory that are supported by the U.S. Department of
Energy, Oce of Science, Oce of Basic Energy Sciences, under
Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. Dr Sheng Pengs eorts on
the synthesis of Ag icosahedral nanoparticles, Ag nanocubes,
and Ag/FexOy hybrid nanoparticles are greatly appreciated.
2509
Tutorial Review
7 M. E. Quadros and L. C. Marr, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011,
45, 1071310719.
8 Z.-M. Xiu, Q.-B. Zhang, H. L. Puppala, V. L. Colvin and P. J.
J. Alvarez, Nano Lett., 2012, 12, 42714275.
9 D. T. Schoen, A. P. Schoen, L. Hu, H. S. Kim, S. C. Heilshorn
and Y. Cui, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 36283632.
10 A. Nagy and G. Mestl, Appl. Catal., A, 1999, 188, 337353.
11 J. G. Serafin, A. C. Liu and S. R. Seyedmonir, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 1998, 131, 157168.
lvarez-Corral, M. Mun
oz-Dorado and I. Rodrgue12 M. A
Garca, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 31743198.
13 Y. Yamamoto, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 31993222.
14 D. D. Lu, Y. G. Li and C. P. Wong, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol.,
2008, 22, 815834.
15 A. Munari, J. Xu, E. Dalton, A. Mathewson and K. M. Razeeb,
in 2009 IEEE 59th Electronic Components and Technology
Conference, IEEE, San Diego, CA, 2009, vol. 14, pp. 448452.
16 Y. Sun, Nanoscale, 2010, 2, 16261642.
17 Z. Yu, Q. Zhang, L. Li, Q. Chen, X. Niu, J. Liu and Q. Pei, Adv.
Mater., 2011, 23, 664668.
18 T. W. Odom and G. C. Schatz, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111,
36673668 and all articles in this special issue.
19 M. Moskovits, J. Raman Spectrosc., 2005, 36, 485.
20 A. Tao, F. Kim, C. Hess, J. Goldberger, R. He, Y. Sun, Y. Xia
and P. Yang, Nano Lett., 2003, 3, 1229.
21 Z.-Y. Li and Y. Xia, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 243249.
22 Y. Sun and G. P. Wiederrecht, Small, 2007, 3, 19641975.
23 Y. Hu and Y. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 1332913335.
24 W. Feng, L.-D. Sun and C.-H. Yan, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4393.
25 P. Christopher, H. Xin and S. Linic, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3,
467472.
26 Y. Lei, F. Mehmood, S. Lee, J. Greeley, B. Lee, S. Seifert,
R. E. Winans, J. W. Elam, R. J. Meyer, P. C. Redfern,
gl, M. J. Pellin, L. A. Curtiss and
D. Teschner, R. Schlo
S. Vajda, Science, 2010, 328, 224228.
27 R. Xu, D. Wang, J. Zhang and Y. Li, Chem.Asian J., 2006, 1,
888893.
28 M. Rycenga, C. M. Cobley, J. Zeng, W. Li, C. H. Moran,
Q. Zhang, D. Qin and Y. Xia, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111,
36693712.
29 K. L. Kelly, E. Coronado, L. L. Zhao and G. C. Schatz, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2003, 107, 668677.
30 Y. Sun and Y. Xia, Analyst, 2003, 128, 686691.
31 H. A. Atwater and A. Polman, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 205213.
32 A. P. Kulkarni, K. M. Noone, K. Munechika, S. R. Guyer and
D. S. Ginger, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 15011505.
33 A. Tao, S. Habas and P. Yang, Small, 2008, 4, 310325.
34 E. V. Shevchenko, D. V. Talapin, N. A. Kotov, S. OBrien and
C. B. Murray, Nature, 2006, 439, 5559.
35 X. Ye, J. E. Collins, Y. Kang, J. Chen, D. T. N. Chen,
A. G. Yodh and C. B. Murray, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
2010, 107, 2243022435.
36 V. K. LaMer and R. H. Dinegar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1950, 72,
48474854.
37 V. M. Fokin and E. D. Zanotto, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 2000,
265, 105112.
2510
This journal is
Tutorial Review
This journal is
2511