Case

They claim that they solve for the impact of race but the welfare queen further progresses
racism. Removing welfare only creates more racism. Trying to prevent these ideologies
wont change the mindset of the legislation. More racism will just start up again in the
future, masking the one before it. Slavery was solved. Next, Jim Crow was solved.
Segregation by liberal means, etc., more racism will just mask itself from the pass. This
takes out solvency.

1NR Para The PIC [1:00]

Our counterplan solves for the geopolitical racism that is being created by
borders, we solve for the Native and help prevent further colonization of
the natives.

Lets examine the Strong 96 card read in the 2AC. Quote: Soverign acts
have the quality of referring only to themselves as moemnts of
existential intervention. Crossapply our Thrift 0 extension analytic I will
read next. Racism is HUGE and ubiquitous.

They also say that Death is necessary for there to be politics. Ok, death is
happening right now because of racism, is racism necessary for politics?
Yeah, but ONLY FOR SOLVING IT.

First extend the Thrift 0 card: the use of The before United
States federal government inscribes geopolitical borders and
national identity onto us discursively by establishing the
symbolic authority of government structures and evoking a
mental construction of the State that is totalizing, creating usthem dichotomies. Specifically, youll be extending the last
warrant from Thrift which says that little words carry the MOST
potential to be politically subversive precisely because they go
unnoticed.
Second youll extend our Dikec 2 evidence, which says that the
affs bordered discourse breeds a racist mindset. Geopolitically
forming boundaries has been the justification for historical
racist atrocities like Hitlers final solution, which was based on
an inside-us of pure german people and an outside-them of
pollacks, jews and other queer populations to be
exterminated.
Lets take a look at the 2AC, they talk about how small words like the
cant inscribe these huge impacts like racism, but crossapply our
extension of the Thirft 0 card. It evokes a mental construction of the state
that is totalizing.

That means we control impact uniqueness - the root logic of

genocide and war is an us-them mentality that allows us to
demonize other nations into our enemies. Only by
characterizing terrorists responsible for 9-11 as the Afghan
people were we able to justify invading the Middle East
because saying the inscribes the geopolitical bodrers of
where the Middle East is, which caused us to discriminate the
Middle East. And we control magnitude.

You must reject racism - its a D-Rule

Barndt in 91
(co-director of Crossroads (a ministry to dismantle racism), (Joseph, Dismantling Racism, p. 155-156)

The prison of
racism confines us all, people of color and white people alike. It shackles the victimizers as well
as the victim. The walls forcibly keep people of color and white people separate from each other; in our separate prisons we are all
prevented from achieving the human potential that God intends for us. The limitations imposed on people of color by
poverty, subservience, and powerlessness are cruel, inhumane, and unjust; the effects of
uncontrolled power, privelege, and greed, which are the marks of our white prison, will inevitably destroy us
all. But we have also seen that the walls of racism can be dismantled. We are not condemned to an inexorable fate, but are offered the vision
and the possibility of freedom. Brick by brick, stone by stone, the prison of individual, institutional, and cultural racism can be
destroyed. You and I are urgently called to join the efforts of those who know it is time to tear
down, once and for all, the walls of racism. The danger point of self-destruction seems to be drawing
ever more near. The results of centuries of national and worldwide conquest and colonialism, of
military buildups and violent aggression, of overconsumption and environmental destruction
may be reaching a point of no return. A small and predominately white minority of the global
population derives its power and privileges from the sufferings of the vast majority of peoples of
color. For the sake of the world and ourselves, we dare not allow it to continue.
To study racism is to study walls. We have looked at barriers and fences, restraints and limitations, ghettos and prisons.

Third, dont let them read new answers in the 1AR to answer
warrants from the 1NC - our block strategy was based off of
2AC concessions.

2NC - Racism [MUST READ]

Extend Dikec 2 from the 1NC - racism marginalizes the other by alienating the other
through borders.

Now extend Barndt 91 from the overview - racism is a D-rule because its an unethical form
of social suicide in which the exclusion and violencing of the other is justified. It makes all
other violence inevitable and is intolerable in ethical calculus.

And, racism is the ultimate form of dehumanization total loss of liberty.

Feagin 0
(Biography: Joe Feagin is the author of more than forty books, including Living with Racism and Racist America. He is currently graduate
research professor of sociology at the University of Florida, Racist America Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations, Routledge
New York and London)

black Americans, that which should most be their owncontrol

over life and workis that which is most taken away from them by the system of racism. There is a
parallel here to the alienation described by analysts of class and gender oppression. In Karl Marx's analysis
The alienation of oppression extends to other areas. In the case of

of capitalism, the workers' labor, that which is most their own, is that which is most taken away from their control by the capitalist employer.

The worker is separated from control over, and thus alienated from, his or her work.

In addition, feminist theorists have

shown that at the heart of a sexist society is an alienating reality of dehumanized sexuality. Women are separated by sexism from control over

To lose significant control over one's own life choices, body definition, future,
and even self is what subordination imposes. Thus, racial oppression forces a lifelong struggle by
black Americans, as a group and as individuals, to attain their inalienable human rights. Dehumanization is systemic
racism's psychological dynamic, and racialized roles are its social masks. Recurring exploitation, discrimination, and inequality
how their own sexuality is defined.is

constitute its structure, and patterns such as residential segregation are its spatial manifestations.

And, dehumanization is the worst impact, it brings the society to total damnation: a loss of
all value to life, justifies all genocides and atrocities.
Fasching 93
(Professor of Religious Studies in the University of South Florida 1993 [Darrell J., Part II of The ethical challenge of Auschwitz and Hiroshima:
Apocalypse or Utopia?, Chapter 4 "The Ethical Challenge of Auschwitz and Hiroshima to Technological Utopianism", part 4 "The Challenge of
Auschwitz and Hiroshima: From Sacred Morality to Alienation and Ethics", Ebooks]

Although every culture is inherently utopian in its potentiality, the internal social dynamic through which its symbolic world-view is maintained
as a sacred order has a tendency to transform it into a closed ideological universe (in Karl Mannheim's sense of the ideological; namely, a worldview that promises change while actually reinforcing the status quo) that tends to define human identity in terms advantageous to some and at the
expense of others. Historically the

process of dehumanization has typically begun by redefining the other

as, by nature, less than human. So the Nazis did to the Jews, and European Americans did to the
Native Americans, men have done to women, and whites to blacks. By relegating these social definitions to the realm of
nature they are removed from the realm of choice and ethical reflection. Hence those in the superior categories need feel
no responsibility toward those in the inferior categories. It is simply a matter of recognizing reality. Those who are the
objects of such definitions find themselves robbed of their humanity. They are defined by and confined to the present horizon of culture and their

The cosmicization of
social identities is inevitably legitimated by sacred narratives, whether religious or secular-scientific (e.g., the
Nazi biological myth of Aryan racial superiority), which dehumanize not only the victims but also the victors.
place in it, which seeks to rob them of their utopian capacity for theonomous self-transcending self-definition.

For to create such a demonic social order the victors must deny not only the humanity of the other who is treated as totally alien but also their

to imprison the alien in his or her enforced subhuman identity (an identity
that attempts to deny the victim the possibility of self-transcendence) the victor must imprison himself or herself in
this same world as it has been defined and deny his or her own self-transcendence as well. The
own humanity as well. That is,

bureaucratic process that appears historically with the advent of urbanization increases the demonic potential of this process, especially the
modern state bureaucracy organized around the use of the most efficient techniques to control every area of human activity. The result is, as
Rubenstein reminds us,

the society of total domination in which virtually nothing is sacred, not even

human life. The heart of such a bureaucratic social order is the sacralization of professional roles within the bureaucratic structure such
that technical experts completely identify themselves with their roles as experts in the use of techniques while totally surrendering the question of

the two
cultures that drew the world into the cataclysm of World War II, Germany and Japan, were
militaristic cultures, cultures that prized and valued the militaristic ideal of the unquestioningly obedient warrior. In these nations,
the state and bureaucratic order became one and the same. As Lewis Mumford has argued, the army
as an invention of urban civilization is a near-perfect social embodiment of the ideal of the
machine. 37 The army brings mechanical order to near perfection in its bureaucratic structure, where human beings are
stripped of their freedom to choose and question and where each individual soldier becomes
an automaton carrying out orders always "from higher up" with unquestioning obedience.
what those technical skills will be used for to the expertise of those above them in the bureaucratic hierarchy. It is no accident that

And, reject every invasion of liberty - moral side-constraint

Petro 74
[Sylvester, (Prof., Law, Wake Forest Univ.) Toledo Law Review, p. 480]

it is unacceptable to say that the invasion of one

aspect of freedom is of no import because there have been invasions of so many other
aspects. That road leads to chaos, tyranny, despotism and the end of all human aspiration. Ask
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Thus

Solzhensyn. Ask Milovan Dijilas. In sum, if one believes in freedom as a supreme value and the proper ordering principle for any society
aiming to maximize spiritual and material welfare, then

every invasion of freedom must be emphatically identified

and resisted with an undying spirit.

And, racism is modeled globally the CP is necessary to set a precedent to stop global
racism
Robinson 0

(Randall Robinson, 2000, Harvard law Grad, political activist, author, The debt : what America owes to Blacks, pg 123)

To many, the story may initially seem out of place because it is foreign. This is hardly the case. The United States is so unprecedentedly

Those who run

America and benefit materially from its global hegemony regard the world as one place. So, then,
must those around the globe who are subject to Americas overwhelming social and economic influence. American racism is
not merely a domestic social contaminant but a principal American export as well. The very
notion of the nation-state has become little more than a convenient legal fiction or hiding
place for anonymous and rapacious interests.
powerful that it can best be understood (even in its domestic race relations) when observed from without.

Racism engages the logic than makes war and genocide possible: biopoilitics never becomes
genocidal without it
Mendieta 2
(SUNY at Stony Brook, (Eduardo, To make live and to let die Foucault on Racism, Meeting of the Foucault Circle, APA Central Division
Meeting Chicago, April 25th , 2002 http://www.sunysb.edu/philosophy/faculty/emendieta/articles/foucault.pdf)

This is where racism intervenes, not from without, exogenously, but from within, constitutively. For the emergence of biopower as the form of a

racism grants,
conditions for the acceptability of putting to death in a society of

new form of political rationality, entails the inscription within the very logic of the modern state the logic of racism. For
and here I am quoting: the

normalization. Where there is a society of normalization,

where there is a power that is, in all of its surface and in first instance, and first
line, a bio-power, racism is indispensable as a condition to be able to put to death someone, in order to be able to put to death others. The
homicidal [meurtrire] function of the state, to the degree that the state functions on the modality of bio-power, can only be assured by racism
(Foucault 1997, 227) To use the formulations from his 1982 lecture The Political Technology of Individuals which incidentally, echo his
1979 Tanner Lectures the power of the state after the 18 th century, a power which is enacted through the police, and is enacted over the

the population is nothing

more than what the state takes care of for its own sake, of course, the state is entitled to slaughter
it, if necessary. So the reverse of biopolitics is thanatopolitics. (Foucault 2000, 416). Racism, is the thanatopolitics of the
biopolitics of the total state. They are two sides of one same political technology, one same political rationality: the management of
population, is a power over living beings, and as such it is a biopolitics. And, to quote more directly, since

life, the life of a population, the tending to the continuum of life of a people. And with the inscription of racism within the state of biopower, the
long history of war that Foucault has been telling in these dazzling lectures has made a new turn: the war of peoples, a war against invaders,
imperials colonizers, which turned into a war of races, to then turn into a war of classes, has now turned into the war of a race, a biological unit,

Racism is the means by which bourgeois political power, biopower, re-kindles the
fires of war within civil society. Racism normalizes and medicalizes war. Racism makes war the permanent
condition of society, while at the same time masking its weapons of death and torture. As I wrote somewhere else,
racism banalizes genocide by making quotidian the lynching of suspect threats to the health of
the social body. Racism makes the killing of the other, of others, an everyday occurrence by
internalizing and normalizing the war of society against its enemies. To protect society entails we be ready to
against its polluters and threats.

kill its threats, its foes, and if we understand society as a unity of life, as a continuum of the living, then these threat and foes are biological in
nature.

First, we dont solve for all racism caused by borders, we solve for the racism created by
these small words, in this case, its in the context of the.
No piece of legislation can reform the welfare queen, a social society standard because we
cant change the ideologies of the legislation.

Racism outweighs, couple of reasons

Rejecting racism is a D-Rule. Even if they accessed super-mega extinction and Chuck
Norris youd vote neg to tear down racism brick by brick. Even if we dont win an internal
link to solving all racism, well win that the judge has a moral obligation to fight the good
fight anyway. Thats Berndt 91

Loss of freedom is ALSO a D-Rule. Life isnt life without individual agency. Living a predetermined existence under totalitarian rule is worse than not existing. Thats Petro 74

Dehumanization is the underlying cause of oppression and all violence. Sacred narratives
that demonize the Other normalize militarism and perpetuate a total domination of the
state in which nothing is sacred, not even life. Fasching 93 turns the aff - dehumanization is
the root justification for war and exploitation.

they lose all of the 1AC impacts because racism makes war and violence inevitable. Racism
internalizes external war cultures, which causes unsustainable social structures that lead to
revolution, as well as an underlying social motivation to go to war because of social
violence. Thats Mendieta

you have to incorporate probability heavily into impact calculus. Dont privilege ludicrous
impact claims with an assumed 1% probability because you should instead weigh the
potential acceptability.

This is not stupid

1. the net benefit says otherwise. Just because our argument is based off a commonly used
word doesnt mean there arent real implications for the context of its usage. This
argument is about as responsive to our Thrift evidence as reading a no link on Give Back
the Land - it just doesnt cut it.