Sr*6 u l^i

Jan 15, 2016

iA,N 1 il ?ili'i

RE: File No: S- 15107

83

Vancouver Registry

$se rs'i+i
i)freme Court of British Columbia
Between:

THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Petitioner

And:

Marc Pierre Boyer

Respondent

RESPONSE TO PETITION
Filed by

Marc Pierre Boyer

acting under our districts'fiduciary trust
as CFA for several Marijuana Party Electoral District Associations [EDA]
4-858 East 6hAve. Vancouver BC, VST 1Ml [EDA headquarters]

THIS lS A RESPONSE TO the petition filed

The Law Society of British Columbia
845 Cambie Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 429

BY:

Petitioner'sLawyer

MichealKleisinger
The Law Society of British Columbia
845 Gambie Street, Vancouver BC, VGB 429

Part

1:

ORDERS GOI'ISENTED

TO:

THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C,

As expressed in the attached PROTEST

Synopsis of Part 1: Marc Boyer asked for and would like to consent to proceed with
responding to points 1 thru 4 of this Petition /case. But, I won't consent to be mistaken
by this pedantic trap to consent to being an all capitals ENTITY. A basic understanding
can be established at this First Appearance, in order to proceed properly, by this court
addressing the following courses, NAMELY: 1) Declared that all assumptions of holding
special recognition are dismissed, or (2) Rule that my bond has a face value that needs
to be established [for example] under the PPSA; [8y pro ceeding under another Act?]
Part 2: ORDERS OPPOSED: We oppose the granting of any order that the BAR desires to
implement in points '1 thru 4 of this Petition. As we see it, we have been extended 21 days
[as you call it] from the date served to submit a challenge to points '1 thru 4, and we will be
filing a detailed response Petition, in order to proceed with addressing our general position of:
there is no authority in any other Act to subvert the Supremacy of the Canada Elections Act.
Part 3: ORDERS ON WHICH NO POSITION lS TAKEN: The facts contained in the Affldavits
are gcod enough to file a factual basis, a legal basis, and materials to be relied on to contest
our claim that no Act can subvert the Act. As we see it, no paper queen can commii sedition
by assuming that the BAR must defend this trust violation, because there's this omission of an
allegiance to preclude you from obeying orders that destroy Canada and the Commonwealth,
in order to conform to this paper queen's desire to ignore an oath taken on a plastic Stone.
1. AS we see it.' we are not contesting the estimated 2-hour timeline to settle this 1 32page Petition. BECAUSE we agree that our PROTEST can be ruled on, in this timeframe; in this way, proceed to a date set to appear on this protest, contained in Part 1.

,.i

i.-,.i ) :

1."

ji

Novemb.er.lA7,

\. .

"

qfs
-2.

MOTION ON REPEALING MARC BOYER'S GAG ORDEd.-:...::-,.:.:-.:..:

in.?QQt;.t\ttgrc Boyer was served a gag order by the head registrar of the Civil Registry _.- . --B.ryk,
calleC. l/r. Messenger. This gag order came from filing one document that he called ,.,exaticus,
--".ind oiiginalfy his gag order only applied to the civil registry, and it now applies to the criminal
registry as well, because i keep bringing up the thorny issue that this court now faces again.
Except now it's far worse than when i started, and it can never get better without someone like
me going the distance in spite of the huge obstacles, because if i don't, then who will?

.:!.

2.

ln this new case, the BAR now wants to stop me from acting like a lawyer in a criminal matter,
when l'm acting like a barrister, who is defending the issue of no jurisdiction at the arraignment.
[ON THIS]: Criminal charges are not a criminal matter until after the arraignment.
1 . At face value: With this common law motion filed by the BAR, we have done a full circle;
by this i mean, we're back to the original reason for this decade old gag ordeq except
worse; where the BAR wants exclusivity to represent anyone in any phase of a court
proceeding, in order to bar anyone like me from making a common law defence because i
know and act on benefiting from theAchilles heal that the minutes of this vote exposed.

3.

The larger issue at stake in this case is that after 22 years of every one associated with the
BAR [ike] law enforcement officers are prohibited from being a common law Peace Officer and
every lawyer has been prohibited from defending any common law application in a criminal
matter, which has resulted where all Canadian common law rights and Freedoms have been
systematically gutted by lawyers [in 1993] and enforced under under Civilian Oversight [1998]

4.

[at face value] lN THIS CASE, of relying on the mountain of statutory limitation placed on our
Free and Democratic society [under R v Oakes] means the fact remains that when no one can
defend common law, results where the BAR is entrenched on destroying democratic freedom
by insisting that the!;Act supersedes the Act, which plays hand in hand with NATO passing /
implementing this sedition Act called S-55 of the CDSA, which lby virtue of the fact that it came
from Royal ascentl, results where all BAR member can actually engage in vanquishing all its
disadvantaged Canadians by causing the total decimation of all human rights known to man,
because a faceless paper queen called governor in council said so. But then Pierre Trudeau
called our present culmination of this grand plan: '? short te rm pain for a long term gain"

5.

lf anyone cares to take note: Under s-2 of S 55 of the CDSA all Public Safety will be handed
over to NATO under anotherAct tabled this time by Justin Trudeau, with his majority will pass
the full implementation of this seditious act of omission in the nex Throne Speach, lnote: s-2,1]
"without restricting the generality of the foregoing" After this, NATO Federal Courts can now
tell Parliament that it holds sole 'across the board' jurisdiction over Public Safeiy in Canada.
1. So the cast is set, so this new Zionist loving Prime Minister [at face value] can take that
giant step of totally abandoning our Sovereignty overto NATO is almost a fait accomplie;
2. EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT: Constitutional law under the SCC is still Supreme in
Canada, and a bencher [!ike i'm facing in this BA.R charge] is caught in a trap of serving
two masters, and must make a choice. NAMELY: Will this judge rebel by submitting to this
sedition [OR] will the BCSC benchers rebel and side with the SCC as being Supreme?

6.

Frankly, all we can do is place our faith in God, because the fate of men in Canada becoming a
banana republic in their demonic New World Order is held by two or three witnesses, in an
insignificant side ruling in a case where the messenger will either be denied the right to uphold
the law as Supreme in order to protect the flduciary trust to Canadian Sovereignty as Supreme.
1
SO MAKE A CHOICE: As we understand it, this bencher will either obey a Sec 126(2) CC
interference by the new Attorney General or the conscience of the Minister of Justice, and
this choice is held by this new player on the scene, NAMELY: Jody Wlson Rayborn

.;."'

:tj

7.

ln 1996, she divorced me shortly and after being diagnosed with lymphoma, i returned to canada
This angel told me to go to Bc, where iwould be needed later. on Nov 13, 1gg9, i crossed the
border, and i ihen got my first and only flu-shot, which kicked my lymphoma into full gear.
On the evening of 9/11, i had a very lucid dream, where i was told the recipe to make my
remarcable Soma cookies, in order to cure my ever increasing cancer pains, and to run with it.

8.

At that time, i made myself a royal pain at City Hall, in order to have my landed on land in Canada
status be established, and to pursue a common law defence, under the Marijuana Party. I was
eventually charged for protestlng too aggressively at City Hall in Jan 5'h,2004, and then in Sept
28th,2004, for operating a commercial premise known as the Vancouver East Marijuana Party
Headquarters, where at theArraignment in November 1Orh 2004, i got the charges dropped, and i
was to appear in a week to file for damages, because i flled this 17-page article entitled NOTICE
OF DENIAL OF CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED, and that evening my chest plate was snapped in
2, by two VPD duty Sargents, and that morning i died, and had a face to face contact with this
angel [as if in a white cloud] that i met when i was 13 [on this] my father was 54, and i was now
54, and this angel Iooked just like me; At the end of this meeting, i was swallowed by the heart of
the earth, [for lack of any other term to explain it] and returned with this partial mended broken
chest plate. A few days laier, I went to VGH, where i got X-rays that showed the fracture was real.

SIDE BAR lin hindsight] this event signalled Daniel 8:14, because 2300 mornings later, the
tidal wave that struck Fukushima hit, where [for at least a week before] i clearly warned
authority with a Get Well Soon card that something big was about to happen on that day.

1.

I reported this broken chest incident at my next court appearance, and as to instructions given
at this 1st arraignment, i boldly filed this priceless gift from God /damage award that is actually
still a default judgment, yet swept away and destroyed by Wally Oppal. [Sec 340 FRAUD].

9. I then filed a legal paper trap wiih Revenue Canadd, which gave me a great civil defence that iook
.. 4 months to set-up. i filed a Petition to have this criminal case flle dealt with civilly. .Eollowing this
l"rappearance fwhere i got what i call my court victory] i was slapped with this gag order.
trial [on this Party Headquarters charges] a miraculous twist in fate happened,
where my sentence was read the day afier the Election Writ dropped, and point 7 now made an
erroneous claim that i was mis'taken' to believe that the Elections Act offered me any immunity.

10. At this criminal

1.

'11

ON THIS: Without this quirk, i could never have a chance to add a trust challenge [by means
of a caveat to my candidacyl that caused JP Kingsley, his Clerk, and the Chief Justice to
resign in late December 2005, over a fiduciary trust violation that i set up in this trap /caveat.

. I rekindled the issue of getting the $1000. deposit returned this spring, for the 2004/05 election.
and in order to comply wlth their prescribed paperwork, ifiled all the proper articles to get this
deposit back. The file was cleared for payment after being scrutinized, and filed on time by our
Party's auditor As to Elections Canada's original estimate, we should have received this check,
before the new election campaign started. They knew that iwas going to court with or without this
check, and since Mr Buhler has added this case that involves lves cote, actually means, i can
have this court rule on ihis check, because we see it as an essential element in this Civil Claim.

AFFIRMED BEFORE ME at Vancouver.

British Columbia, on l.hflt;r;,nr l1i r?OtL

l.;7,i1
' , i,
,

,r i,::,iij r,,r ii) r 'iiilt irrlt : ,iiJirr,,, rii;

1

r :ir lr,i1

5l1

l,/l!r?ii,ir,

Marc Pierre Boyer

APFEiliDIX A:

On outilning the irnporiance of this Birtfr Statenremt /bond issue

ON OUTLINING SPECIFIC AtsNIORMALIT!ES IN MY ABilIORMAL BIRTI{ STATEMENT,

PREF,ACE: in the attached copy, i printed a back to back copy, just like my original etched
short form, which is part of a long form registry that is actually like how i laid-up the 2nd way.
This original document is on acetate film, the hand writing is my mother's, done with a special
pen, where after this document is registered, is then dipped in acid, and the writing is actually
transparent, in order that no one can alter or forge this document. In 99.999% of the time,
the whole document is dipped at the same time, and a Red Seal is/was added, and in this
way this baby became this bond issue [a Warehouse Receipt], which gave the government
[at that time] a million dollars, in return for the bondholder [UCC /the Pope] to be entitled to
the entire earnings /output created by this indentured slave status, for the rest of their life.
lN MY CASE, because my father signed this commission resulted where [in Jan 1952]
only the right side was dipped in acid. Then, the King died a few weeks later. AND this
document was in estopple for 38 years. The left side was cast in Jan 1sth, 1989.
This dipping was done so that it's impossible to forge or alter this title document later

1.

On the filigree of this Statement /bond: This is a very ancient way to designate [in
this casel the bounty /wealth of the Commonwealth that was in trust with King George
Vl [for his loyal subjects] that were symbolically upheld by the Stone of Destiny, which
is heavily attached to Sumerian, Christian, Jewish and Celtic lore. This Sumerian
twisted Iogic is the foundation for Rom 3: 'what if we do evil, so that good can result?'

2.

This filigree was replaced with boxes in Queen Elizabeth's reign, because the King's
coffers were robbed by this war debt, by being responsible for the damages incurred
by the winning and losing sides of the war. Upon his death, resulted where the Pope
/UCC thru at-large bankers robbed the Commonwealth's trust, by fully implementing
this truly evil ancient Sumerian slavery racket called: WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS.

3.

Because of my father's commission, my Statemeni has all kinds of odd markings to it.
LIKE : The solid line that was drawn-in [at the top of the right side, on the front face].
When it was cast, it designated that this statement or bond is on solid ground.
The line under BOYER is also underlined, meaning my father's trust is on solid ground.

4.

On this title document, my UCC file # is: 11327A, and [on the backside] this Ontario
Registry # 88-361731 was added in 1988, and it's purposely placed above the Crest.
[ON THIS] Had i said 'yes'to this question of: 'do you want a Birth Certificate', this #
would've been directly under Despina Georgas'thumb, just like my Birth # 000665 is
directly under the registrar's signature. Had i fallen for this same trap of saying 'yes',
[in Dec. 1988] my bond would have been seized to pay the war debi, because my #
88-361731 would have been directly under this registrar's signature. But, it's not.

5.

Now, because my father had this trust, is why this # is above the Queen, and this
automatically created 2 quirks: (1) i did not get any Seal, (2) this Special Notice saying
that this statement is not a registration, [therefore] it is a hereditary entitlement.
1. Now, when you look aithe BOND lay-up, This # 88-361731 is above this UCC #,
where the ancient tei-m of: 'being cn the mone-li' :-. cleailrr being express:d. h;i:

2.
3.

Had i been under Despina's thumb, this # would have been taken as a death
certificate being issued, by this # being in the medical practices box. But, it's not.
1. This is why it's a crime of FRAUD to press on me, an all capitals legal entity.
What cannot be mis'taken' [here] is that this # 000665 is now in the Seal section,
which clearly entitles me to 1-share of the value of my King's Commonwealth bond.

4.

NOW COMES THE Blc QUIRK: [because i said 'no', resutted with] The # 37300
being added twice [in 1989], and this is a California Law called: Tifle to property
while on water. ldid not land in Ontario, i'm somehow now landed in California, and
my [inheritance] is now this title bond to 1-share of the Commonwealth's wealth.

5.

The adding of this # 37300 marking, means everyone who trampled on me for the
last decade is guilty of breaking this really ancient trust. AND, 10-years laier, i get
invited to Civilly open this file, where the charge of FRAUD must be dealt with.
1. Today, it's called FRAUD, for depriving me of this title to be fairly treated under
common law. - Sec 340 CC FRAUD. Destroying documents of title. Every one
who, for a fraudulent purpose, destroys, cancels, conceals or obliterates (a) a
document of title to goods or lands, (b) a valuable security or testamentary instrument,
or (c) a judicial or official document, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years. lunder absolute trust liability = guilty]

6.

ON THIS: When the Queen's registry, defaced my Statement with this #37300, in 1989 is
not fraud; these abnormalities are actually prescribed by UCC law, and exceptionally rare.
1. lN HINDSIGHT: This FRAUD originally occuned, when Wally Oppal committed the
crime of the millennium, by authorizing the BAR to commit FRAUD, in order to entrap
me to get a PERSON, and that way this now 83 file thick dossier that was created, in
2004 12005 could jusi be closed, because somehow my bond had been cashed in.
2. In twisted UCC logic, it's as if i did this ten year sentence. Frankly, most of the abuse
that occurred in the last decade, had to occur, BUT under respondeat Superior some
one must be made accountable for this abuse. AND this can be done, by recognizing
that their is a real value to this BOND, at this first appearance, and proceed accordingly.

7.

AS WE SEE lT This fiduciary trust violation falls on who ever holds the Office of
this paper Queen of Canada; [since the Charter] the trust is now on Marc Mayrand,
and he is also holding the Canadian BAR's trust account. AND if i,m wrong then,
the Crown is duty bound to press [who ever holds this trust] to appear at the first
appearance, or at least make themselves be known who they are for the record]

lN CONCLUSION: What should be noted is THAT: the abnormalities on my statement are

[by intent] extremely rare, because there's this big red seal that hides this UCC bond number.
AND, because She violated this ancient trust means: We are entitled to seize Her certificates.

1.

Frankly, there were so few such bonds issued in the first place, and there were so
many traps to get thru - THIS MEANS THAT: 64 years after this bond issue was closed
that we can claim to hold the only real bearer share left, and this means that: the UCC,
or the Crown, or the BAR are now placed with the onus to prove othenivise. AND
1. Frankly, the one responsible for holding this information is Marc Mayrand, and his
clerk lves Cote, who happen to be attached to this Petition from the BAR.
2. Mr. Buhler is representing their interests in this court, and under Sec 337 CC, they
must deliver this information /statistic, at this 1"t appearance. Act according!y.

r,)-

I
:

0[}06s5

!.-

----i+-. L

3a /73